success strategies for grantmaking for sharing

48
Success Strategies for Securing External Funding from State and Federal Education Agencies

Upload: discoverycentermu

Post on 19-Feb-2017

104 views

Category:

Education


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Success strategies for grantmaking for sharing

Success Strategies for

Securing External Funding from

State and Federal Education

Agencies

Page 2: Success strategies for grantmaking for sharing

Workshop Overview

O Intro to the Discovery Center

O Intro of Workshop Participants and

Their Work

O Overview of state and federal

education funding opportunities

O Types of opportunities

O Finding opportunities

Page 3: Success strategies for grantmaking for sharing

Workshop Overview

O Matching your initiatives with correct

funding opportunity

O Proposal Requirements

O Recommendations for developing

competitive proposals

Coherence

Alignment Articulation Justification

Page 4: Success strategies for grantmaking for sharing

Workshop Overview

O Developing and articulating project goals,

rationale, and activities

O Examples of Planning/Design tools

O Content Development

Coherence

Alignment Articulation Justification

Page 5: Success strategies for grantmaking for sharing

Workshop Overview

O Budget Development

O Proposal Preparation

O Reviewer Feedback and

Resubmission

Coherence

Alignment Articulation Justification

Page 6: Success strategies for grantmaking for sharing

Discovery Center for Evaluation, Research,

and Professional Learning – Our Merger

O Established in 2015

O Formal merger of the Discovery and Ohio’s

Evaluation & Assessment Centers)

Page 7: Success strategies for grantmaking for sharing

Our History

O Over 24 years of support for mathematics and science

education initiatives

O Since 1991 - PD opportunities for 20,000+ teachers

O Since 2003 – evaluated 160 state- and federally-

funded projects/programs

O More than $52 million in state and federal grants.

O Nationally recognized provider of research, evaluation,

assessment, and professional development services

Page 8: Success strategies for grantmaking for sharing

Our Staff and Teams O 18-20 staff

O Teams— Executive/Support, Research and Evaluation, Professional Learning

O Knowledge/expertise in: O Advanced Statistics (e.g., Nvivo, HLM, Lisrel,

Winsteps, SPSS, Amos, SAS) O Instrument development and psychometrics O Qualitative/quantitative data collection, analyses,

reporting O Mathematics and science education O Educational leadership, administration, and policy O Professional Learning development and

administration

Page 9: Success strategies for grantmaking for sharing

Our Mission

O Mission – To provide comprehensive, high-quality

research, evaluation, assessment, and professional

development services to improve teaching and

learning and promote equity in opportunity, access,

and outcomes for all learners.

O Committed to

O Collaboration

O Advocacy

O Strategic Innovation

Page 10: Success strategies for grantmaking for sharing

Our Work State-wide Evaluation of

Ohio’s Resident Educator (RE)

Program

NSF ADVANCE Project

Evaluations for MSU, Purdue,

UC

NSF Math and Science

Partnership Project (MSP)

Evaluations for PENN, CUNY,

and SUNY - UB

Improving Teacher Quality (ITQ)

Project Evaluations and State-

wide Ohio MSP Program

Evaluation

Evaluation of Miami’s DHHS

Statewide Mental Health First

Aid Capacity project

Comprehensive analysis of

progress and impact of DPS

education programs

Funding research/grant writing

for YWCA (Hamilton)

Over 30 math/science

workshops and trainings for

650 teachers

Page 11: Success strategies for grantmaking for sharing

Who Funds Great Ideas in Education

Federal Agencies

O National Science Foundation

O Primarily through Education and Human Resources (EHR)

Division (e.g., S-STEM, ECR, AISL, ITEST, STEM-C, ADVANCE,

IUSE)

O National Institutes of Health

O E.g., Participating Orgs – DHHS, NICHD, NINR, NIAID

O U.S. Department of Education

O E.g., IES, FIPSE

Page 12: Success strategies for grantmaking for sharing

Federal Funding Opportunities

National Science Foundation

O Funding opportunity homepage -

http://www.nsf.gov/funding/

O A-Z index:

http://www.nsf.gov/funding/azindex.jsp?start=A

O Example Program Page (STEM-C):

http://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_i

d=505006

O Includes Synopsis of Program, *Link to Solicitation (RFP),

Solicitation # (e.g, 15-527), Deadline for submission, Links

to recent awards and news for the program.

Page 13: Success strategies for grantmaking for sharing

National Institutes of Health

O Funding opportunity homepage -

https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/index.html

O Advanced Search:

https://grants.nih.gov/searchGuide/search_guide.cfm

O Example Program Page (NINR):

http://www.ninr.nih.gov/researchandfunding#.Vp-1ZMYrLIU

O Example Announcement (DHHS – R25):

http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PAR-16-081.html

O Includes Synopsis of Program, Activity Code (R01, R15, etc.),

Related Notices, Funding Opportunity Announcement # (FOA), FOA

Purpose, Key Dates, etc.

Federal Funding Opportunities

Page 14: Success strategies for grantmaking for sharing

U.S. Department of Education

O Funding opportunity homepage -

http://www.grants.gov/web/grants/search-grants.html

O Example Page (IES): https://ies.ed.gov/

O Example Announcement (IES – Ed Res. Grant –

Cognition and Student Learning):

https://ies.ed.gov/funding/pdf/2016_84305A.pdf

O Includes Intro to Announcement, CFDA Number (e.g, 84.305A),

Deadlines, General/Applicant Requirements, Descriptions of

Topics and Research Goals, Links to required forms

Federal Funding Opportunities

Page 15: Success strategies for grantmaking for sharing

Who Funds Great Ideas in Education

State Agencies

Many State agency RFPs are managed by the Ohio

Department of Administrative Services (DAS).

O Funding/Procurement Page -

http://procure.ohio.gov/proc/searchProcOpps.asp

O Ohio Department of Education (ODE)

O E.g., Mathematics and Science Partnership

Program, Straight A Fund, 21st Century

O Ohio Department of Higher Education (formerly

OBR)

O E.g., Improving Teacher Quality

Page 17: Success strategies for grantmaking for sharing

Other Funding Opportunities

Foundation

O Spencer Foundation - http://www.spencer.org/

O Martha Holden Jennings Foundation -

http://www.mhjf.org/

O W.K. Kellogg Foundation - https://www.wkkf.org/

Institutional/Departmental Support

O Departmental Seed Money

O OARS Funding or External Proposal Submission Incentive

(EPSI) Program

O Fellowship Opportunities (e.g., Discovery Center, Scripps)

Page 18: Success strategies for grantmaking for sharing

Finding Opportunities No matter where you search...

O Whether free-style searching or using a database (e.g.,

Foundation Directory, SPIN):

O Use key-words within your field; words in solicitations

O Narrow search criteria by time-frame and geographical

region

O Check eligibility requirements first

O Organize, Save, and Export results for later searches

O Track your results in a spreadsheet, include links to

funding agency websites/opportunities.

O Example of Funding Opportunity Info Spreadsheet

Page 19: Success strategies for grantmaking for sharing

Finding Opportunities

Sign up for Funding Agency Newsletters,

Updates (e.g., NSF “Weekly Digest Bulletin;”

NIH “Watch This Opportunity”).

O Get updates on specific solicitations/

opportunities; funding program

news/changes; new funding opportunities.

O Select updates specific to your field or area

of interest.

Page 20: Success strategies for grantmaking for sharing

Insider Tips O Programs sometimes are merged, renamed,

removed, and solicitations are replaced,

cancelled, or amended

O Take advantage of opportunities to meet

and get to know program officers

O Volunteer to serve on review panels

O When you find a funding opportunity of

interest, review abstracts of recent awards

O Take advantage of “down-time” to work on

proposal ideas

Page 21: Success strategies for grantmaking for sharing

Proposal Requirements

What are common

sections or

elements of

RFP(A)’s or

proposals?

What are typical

requirements for

organizing your

content/ideas?

NSF DRK12 ITQ Foundation

Intro Needs Intro of Org.

Previous support Impact of Previous

Projects Description of

Program/Project

Goals & Anticipated

Outcomes

R&D Design Operations Planning &

Proposed Activities Plan for Using

Funding

Participant

Recruitment

Expertise

Disseminate Replicate &

Disseminate

Broader Impacts Impact of

Program

Evaluation Evaluation

Budget Budget Budget

Page 22: Success strategies for grantmaking for sharing

Recommendations for Competitive

Proposals O Once you find a program that is well-aligned with your proposed

project

O Plan Proposal Logistics:

O Dissect RFP(A) to get a clear understanding of

requirements

O Create an outline of required sections

O Determine how much time you need for proposal

development – AND MULTIPLY BY 2!

O Develop Content:

O Clearly and concisely articulate your ideas

O Use persuasive, active language to show

need/impact/”so what” of your proposed work

Page 23: Success strategies for grantmaking for sharing

Developing and Articulating Goals,

Rationale, and Activities

O Frame Your Project by Typical Proposal Sections

O Outline Goals, Objectives, and Activities

O Use tools to help you visualize your project and its

purpose (e.g., Logic Models)

O Design your project with evaluation in mind

A logic model is essential for coherent

project design.

Page 24: Success strategies for grantmaking for sharing

Content Development - Alignment

O Use Tools to Plan and Design

Page 25: Success strategies for grantmaking for sharing

Project Framing -- Goals

O Represented on a logic model as Outcomes

O Broad statements of project purpose that

describe effects of a project

O Short-, medium-, or long-term and describe

the big-picture of what project can or hopes to

achieve

O Rationale based in extant research and

addresses a need or gap

Page 26: Success strategies for grantmaking for sharing

Project Framing - Objectives

O Represented as Outputs on a logic model

O Aligned with broader goals

O Specific, measurable descriptions of results to be

achieved

O Objectives need specific statements of how you will

measure effectiveness of your activities

O Articulating objectives in a SMART format provides a

clear measurement plan

O SMART = Specific, Measurable, Action-oriented,

Realistic, and Timed

Page 27: Success strategies for grantmaking for sharing

Project Framing - Activities

O Activities could be workshops, curriculum,

educational programs, introduction of new

equipment, creating new positions

O Activities address one or more objectives that

are aligned with goal(s) and address a need

O Impact of an activity can be measured to

assess the extent to which the activity

contributed to achievement of the objective

Page 28: Success strategies for grantmaking for sharing

Goals, Objectives, or Activities?

1. 90% of women STEM faculty at Newfoundland University will be

retained during the 5 years of the project as measured by 2019

university-level data.

2. Diversity Leaders will be hired and trained for each of the STEM

departments to act as mentors for junior faculty.

3. Improve the climate for female faculty in STEM departments at

Newfoundland University.

4. A faculty mentoring program will be implemented for each of the STEM

departments whereby each junior female faculty will be partnered with

a senior female faculty member.

5. Perceptions of climate for STEM female faculty will increase

significantly in at least 4 of the 10 STEM departments at

Newfoundland University as measured through a pre-post analysis of

the 2015 and 2019 Newfoundland University Climate Survey.

Page 29: Success strategies for grantmaking for sharing

Content Development - Articulation

O Different funders and programs have different

expectations for project design and evaluation

– speak the language of the funder

O Clearly describe goals, objectives, and activities

of your work

Page 30: Success strategies for grantmaking for sharing

Content Development - Justification

O Grant funded projects generally require

evaluation – be sure it meets expectations for

rigor

O Planning the evaluation can lead to re-

assessment of the project

O Outcomes must be significant and relevant to

the funder (e.g., student learning, teacher

content knowledge)

Page 31: Success strategies for grantmaking for sharing

Coherence

Alignment Articulation Justification

Remember to keep Coherence in mind:

O From Alignment of initiatives during funding opportunity searches…

O …to Articulation of your ideas through clear/concise writing and visuals....

O …to Justification of why your work should be funded.

Page 32: Success strategies for grantmaking for sharing

Budget Planning

O Examples of different “costs” for proposals

O Tips for projecting budget and time and effort to

cover project personnel and activities.

O Justify expenses and be sure they are allowable by funding

agency

O Center templates for a budget and/or for calculating

person effort

Page 33: Success strategies for grantmaking for sharing

Possible Staff Miami guidelines NSF guidelines

Faculty 1 day per week , 3

months summer, course

buyout

2 months

Staff 1 day per week if

infrequent, buy time

(contribute to existing

salary) full-time or part-

time benefits

Will not fund secretarial staff

Student GA? hourly or stipend

with tuition waived

Budget Development –

Personnel Salary

Page 34: Success strategies for grantmaking for sharing

Possible Staff 2015-2016 Miami Grant Guidelines

Faculty Academic Year = 37.32%

Summer = 16.47%

Staff Full time = 37.32%

Part time = 16.47%

Student Anytime = 1.7%

Budget Development –

Personnel Fringe Benefits

Note: multiple year awards will carry the benefit rate for the year in which the

award was given.

Page 35: Success strategies for grantmaking for sharing

O Local/State

O Plan meetings, focus groups, observations,

workshops

O National

O Conferences, required meetings

O International

O Rarely funded without a direct relationship to the

project

Budget Development - Travel

Page 36: Success strategies for grantmaking for sharing

O This area is not for Participant Support

O Hosting but very few funding sources will cover

hosting expenses

O Special software

O Envelopes, paper, etc. for questionnaires

O Books (not for participants)

O Copying

O Equipment – must be project specific

Budget Development –

Supplies & Materials

Page 37: Success strategies for grantmaking for sharing

O Consultants – there are payment limits

O Subcontracts

O Pay indirect costs only on the first $25,000

O Subcontractor must have

O DUNS#

O Register with System for Award Management

(SAM) for NSF proposals

Budget Development - Services

Page 38: Success strategies for grantmaking for sharing

O Participant support costs are not included when

calculating indirect costs

O These costs are for materials that go directly to

participants – those costs that would be incurred by

participants in a grant-sponsored workshop

Budget Development –

Participant Support

Page 39: Success strategies for grantmaking for sharing

O Another term for Indirect Costs is Facilities and

Administration (F&A)

O Usually specified in RFP

O Percentage charged to projects at Miami

O Federal

O 44.5% Organized research

O 44.0% Sponsored instruction

O 39.0% Other sponsored activities State – usually 8-10%

O Private – Varies by project total, usually 0-10%

http://www.miamioh.edu/research/proposal-prep/budgets/

Budget Development – Indirect

Costs

Page 40: Success strategies for grantmaking for sharing

Proposal Preparation

O Examples of forms (e.g, Cover Page, Bio, C&P)

O Allow time for required forms, signatures, and

documents from collaborators.

O Confirm buy-in from collaborators and

assign clear deadlines for

signatures/forms.

O Meet institutional (internal) deadlines

O Example check-list of forms/deadlines for

NSF grant

Page 41: Success strategies for grantmaking for sharing

O Required and allowable forms will be specified in RFP

O Frequently required:

O Cover Page

O Budget

O Budget Justification

O Vita – NSF Biosketch, 1 or 2 page CV

O Current & Pending Support

O Letter of Support from OARS

O Miami also requires:

O Subcontract form if using a subcontractor

Proposal Forms

Page 42: Success strategies for grantmaking for sharing

O Deadlines

O Funding agency

O Miami

O OARS ESPI bonus for early submission

O Collaborator forms

O Signatures

O Letters of support

Proposal Forms

Page 43: Success strategies for grantmaking for sharing

Interpreting Review Feedback

O “Summary” (consensus) review is more critical than

individual reviews

O Follow up with program officer if possible

O Address questions and respond to critique that

resonate with your proposal and its purpose

O Avoid adding suggested activities/components

unless they fit your work

O Remember - Composition of review panels change

with each submission

O ALWAYS REVISE AND RESUBMIT

Page 44: Success strategies for grantmaking for sharing

Review Feedback Examples

DOE i3 review example:

US. Department of Education - EDCAPS G5-Technical

Review Form (New)

NSF Program review example:

IUSEGrantProposalReviews2014

Page 45: Success strategies for grantmaking for sharing

How We Can Help - As You Reflect

How do I develop an

effective research

and/or evaluation

plan?

What are the

differences between

between goals and

objectives?

What type of statistical

analysis is most

appropriate for

analyzing my data?

How do I appropriately

budget for my project

or program’s proposed

activities?

?

?

?

?

Page 46: Success strategies for grantmaking for sharing

How We Can Help – Research Hub

O Faculty/Staff Research Hub - Specialized workspace

equipped with computers and software

O Technical support and consultation

O Located in

408 McGuffey Hall

Page 47: Success strategies for grantmaking for sharing

How We Can Help – Center Services

Comprehensive - Collaboration or assistance developing a

project/program proposal for external funding and/or

designated services for funded initiatives.

Technical Assistance – Subaward or contract to perform

specific technical services for proposed or existing

project/program.

General Support – In-kind (Miami) or case-by-case contract

agreement (non-Miami) to perform specific support

services for proposed or existing project/program.

Page 48: Success strategies for grantmaking for sharing

Contact & Location Information

Discovery Center for Evaluation,

Research, and Professional Learning

210 E. Spring St.

408 McGuffey Hall

Phone: (513) 529-1686

Email: [email protected]

Updates to

Discovery Center Website

coming soon.