student retention pieces of the puzzle: improving student retention and graduation rates

50
Student Retention Pieces of the Puzzle: Improving Student Retention and Graduation Rates

Upload: raven-hynes

Post on 30-Mar-2015

227 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Student Retention Pieces of the Puzzle: Improving Student Retention and Graduation Rates

Student Retention

Pieces of the Puzzle:Improving Student

Retention and Graduation Rates

Page 2: Student Retention Pieces of the Puzzle: Improving Student Retention and Graduation Rates

Student RetentionOverview

Who Are Today’s College Students?

Who Stays? Who Leaves?

Why?

What can we do about it?

Page 3: Student Retention Pieces of the Puzzle: Improving Student Retention and Graduation Rates

Student Retention

• By traditional standards, students are brighter and better prepared today than ever before.

• BUT, they suffer from low expectations and high grade inflation in the secondary school system.

Pieces of the PuzzleFact No. 1

Page 4: Student Retention Pieces of the Puzzle: Improving Student Retention and Graduation Rates

Student Retention

A Ten Year Comparison of Freshmen GPA and Mean SAT at the University of Texas at Austin

2.25

2.30

2.35

2.40

2.45

2.50

2.55

2.60

2.65

2.70

2.75

1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995

1100

1120

1140

1160

1180

1200

1220

1240

GPA

Mean SAT

Page 5: Student Retention Pieces of the Puzzle: Improving Student Retention and Graduation Rates

Student Retention

An Indexed Ten Year Comparison of Freshmen GPA and SAT at The University of Texas at Austin

96.0

97.0

98.0

99.0

100.0

101.0

102.0

103.0

104.0

105.0

106.0

1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995

Indexed SAT

Indexed GPA

Page 6: Student Retention Pieces of the Puzzle: Improving Student Retention and Graduation Rates

Student Retention

Mean SAT Total Test Score by Ethnic Group Fall & Summer First Time in College Freshmen 1980 to 1995

White/Asian Am.

African Am.Hispanic

800850900950

1000105011001150120012501300

1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995

Page 7: Student Retention Pieces of the Puzzle: Improving Student Retention and Graduation Rates

Student Retention

SAT Total Score Ranges (Middle 50%) by Ethnicity for the Entering Class of 1996

900

950

1000

1050

1100

1150

1200

1250

1300

1350

White Black Asian Hispanic

SAT 25 percentileSAT 50 percentileSAT 75 percentile

Page 8: Student Retention Pieces of the Puzzle: Improving Student Retention and Graduation Rates

Student RetentionThe Percentage of Admitted Students in Selected

SAT Total Test Score Categories All University

16%

24%26%

21%

10%

3%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

<1100 1100to

1199

1200to

1299

1300to

1399

1400to

1499

1500to

1600

Page 9: Student Retention Pieces of the Puzzle: Improving Student Retention and Graduation Rates

Student Retention

% Who said there was a “very good chance” they would . . .

• 1% Fail a course

• < 1% Drop out temporarily

• 3% Transfer to another college

Page 10: Student Retention Pieces of the Puzzle: Improving Student Retention and Graduation Rates

Student Retention

Time Spent in High School . . .

56% studied 5 hrs or less per week

33% watched TV more than 5 hrs/week

11% read for pleasure more than 5 hrs/week

Page 11: Student Retention Pieces of the Puzzle: Improving Student Retention and Graduation Rates

Student Retention

• 75% Academic reputation

• 57% Grads get good jobs

• 42% Low tuition

• 42% Grads go to top grad schools

Why Students Chose UT-Austin

Page 12: Student Retention Pieces of the Puzzle: Improving Student Retention and Graduation Rates

Student Retention

• We know what works in student retention. Nearly ALL of our retention programs are successful.

• They improve the academic performance and increase the retention rate of students who participate.

Pieces of the PuzzleFact No. 2

Page 13: Student Retention Pieces of the Puzzle: Improving Student Retention and Graduation Rates

Student Retention

• We know why students leave UT Austin:

• Students report multiple “causes.”– 65% reported PERSONAL reasons such as:

• lack of motivation, “burn out”, poor high school preparation,family problems and health

– 58% reported FINANCIAL or work-school conflicts

– 33% reported ACADEMIC problems

Pieces of the PuzzleFact No. 3

Page 14: Student Retention Pieces of the Puzzle: Improving Student Retention and Graduation Rates

Student Retention

People ReasonsPolicy Reasons

Resource Reasons

Teaching/Curriculum Reasons

StudentAttrition

Page 15: Student Retention Pieces of the Puzzle: Improving Student Retention and Graduation Rates

Student Retention

• Are students not “well prepared” for college?

• Are students not “motivated?”

• Are students here for the “wrong” reasons?

• Can students afford to attend UT?

People Reasons - Students

Page 16: Student Retention Pieces of the Puzzle: Improving Student Retention and Graduation Rates

Student Retention

• Why should faculty worry about the graduation rate?

• How can we improve graduation rates without lowering academic standards?

• Why should we spend more time teaching?

• Why should we teach “differently?”

People Reasons - Faculty

Page 17: Student Retention Pieces of the Puzzle: Improving Student Retention and Graduation Rates

Student Retention

• Would a failing grade replacement policy improve retention rates?

• What happens to the students in majors with a “grade point requirement” who have greater than a 2.0 gpa but less than the requirement?

Policy Reasons

Page 18: Student Retention Pieces of the Puzzle: Improving Student Retention and Graduation Rates

Student Retention

• If enrollment increases, will students have more difficulty obtaining courses that meet their interests and degree requirements?

• If more students are successful at the freshmen and sophomore level, will we have the faculty resources to teach upper division level courses?

Resource Reasons

Page 19: Student Retention Pieces of the Puzzle: Improving Student Retention and Graduation Rates

Student Retention

• What are the risks/rewards of changing HOW we teach?

• Is our curriculum too diverse; does it give students too many choices?

• How can we better motivate students to attend class?

• How do we reward teachers for promoting retention?

Curriculum / Teaching Reasons

Page 20: Student Retention Pieces of the Puzzle: Improving Student Retention and Graduation Rates

Student Retention

Who Leaves?

Page 21: Student Retention Pieces of the Puzzle: Improving Student Retention and Graduation Rates

Student Retention

1st Year Attrition Rate

SAT Qtr % HS Rank %

Top Qtr 09 Top 10% 09

2nd Qtr 13 Next 15% 16

3rd Qtr 17 2nd Qtr 25

4th Qtr 26 Bottom Half 50

Page 22: Student Retention Pieces of the Puzzle: Improving Student Retention and Graduation Rates

Student Retention

The Percent of Students Who Were Academically Dismissed and the Percent Who Left UT Voluntarily

0123456789

101112

19

86

19

87

19

88

19

89

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

Year

Pe

rce

nt

DismissedVoluntary

Page 23: Student Retention Pieces of the Puzzle: Improving Student Retention and Graduation Rates

Student Retention

Mean First Year Cumulative GPA by SAT Total Test Score and High School Rank Entering Classes of 1992-1994

Top 10% 11% to 25%

2nd Qtr.

Bottom half

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

3.50

4.00

Le

ss th

an

80

0

08

00

to0

89

0

09

00

to0

99

0

10

00

to1

09

0

110

0 to

119

0

12

00

to1

29

0

13

00

to1

39

0

14

00

to1

60

0

Tota

lG

rou

p

SAT Total Test Score Categories

Me

an

GP

A

Page 24: Student Retention Pieces of the Puzzle: Improving Student Retention and Graduation Rates

Student RetentionFirst Year Retention Rate by SAT Total Test Score and High

School Rank Entering Classes of 1992-1994

Top 10% 11% to 25%

2nd Qtr. Bottom half

0102030405060708090

100

Less

than

800

080

0 to

089

0

090

0 to

099

0

100

0 to

109

0

1100

to11

90

120

0 to

129

0

130

0 to

139

0

140

0 to

160

0

Tota

lG

roup

SAT Total Test Score Categories

Percent

Page 25: Student Retention Pieces of the Puzzle: Improving Student Retention and Graduation Rates

Student RetentionMean First Year Cumulative GPA by SAT Total Test Score Category by

Ethnicity for the Entering Classes of 1992-1994All University -- White Versus Hispanic

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

3.50

4.00

Less

than

800

0800

to08

90

0900

to09

90

1000

to10

90

1100

to11

90

1200

to12

90

1300

to13

90

1400

to16

00

Tota

lG

roup

WhiteHispanic

Page 26: Student Retention Pieces of the Puzzle: Improving Student Retention and Graduation Rates

Student Retention

Mean First Year Cumulative GPA by SAT Total Test Score Category by Ethnicity for the Entering Classes of 1992-1994All University -- White Versus African American

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

3.50

4.00

Less

than

800

0800

to08

90

0900

to09

90

1000

to10

90

1100

to11

90

1200

to12

90

1300

to13

90

1400

to16

00

Tota

lG

roup

WhiteAfrican Am.

Page 27: Student Retention Pieces of the Puzzle: Improving Student Retention and Graduation Rates

Student Retention

First Year Attrition Rate by SAT Category and Service Received --Entering Class of

1995

52

31

21

1517

15

119

15

18

23

11

1512 11

6

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Bottom Qtr 3rd Qtr 2nd Qtr Top Qtr

NeitherOrientationHousingBoth

Page 28: Student Retention Pieces of the Puzzle: Improving Student Retention and Graduation Rates

Student Retention

• Historically, retention programs at UT-Austin re-shuffle the deck and change the faces of those who succeed, but do not improve the university-wide graduation rate.

Pieces of the PuzzleFact No. 4

Page 29: Student Retention Pieces of the Puzzle: Improving Student Retention and Graduation Rates

Student Retention

• The graduation rate at UT Austin has not changed in over 30 years.

Pieces of the PuzzleFact No. 5

Page 30: Student Retention Pieces of the Puzzle: Improving Student Retention and Graduation Rates

Student Retention

Attrition and Graduation Rates for First Time Freshmen 1986 - 1995

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995

6 yr graduation

5 yr graduation

4 yr graduation

1st yr attrition

Percent

Year

Page 31: Student Retention Pieces of the Puzzle: Improving Student Retention and Graduation Rates

Student Retention

Six Year Graduation Rates by Ethnicity 1986 -1990

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

1986 1987 1988 1989 1990

Asian American

White

African AmericanHispanic

PERCENT

ENTERING CLASS

Page 32: Student Retention Pieces of the Puzzle: Improving Student Retention and Graduation Rates

Student RetentionThe Percentage of Students Who Leave The University of Texas at Austin During Each

Year of Enrollment

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25

1st yr. 2nd yr. 3rd yr. 4th yr. 5th yr. 6th yr.

Attrition during:

Per

cent

1985 1986 1987 1988 1989

Page 33: Student Retention Pieces of the Puzzle: Improving Student Retention and Graduation Rates

Student Retention

• Academic “Darwinism” has been the dominant retention philosophy on this campus.

• UT-Austin’s academic reputation depends on letting only the “fittest” survive!

• Student failure rates in the freshmen/sophomore year restrict graduation rates.

Pieces of the PuzzleFact No. 6

Page 34: Student Retention Pieces of the Puzzle: Improving Student Retention and Graduation Rates

Student Retention

The Percent of A/B Grades and D/F Grades in Biology 301 L '91/'92 to '95/'96

0

20

40

60

80

100

91-92 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96

Year

Pe

rce

nt

% A/B% D/F

Page 35: Student Retention Pieces of the Puzzle: Improving Student Retention and Graduation Rates

Student Retention

The Percent of A/B Grades and D/F Grades in Chemistry 302 '91/'92 to '95/'96

0102030405060708090

100

91-92 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96

Year

Pe

rce

nt

Percent A/BPercent D/F

Page 36: Student Retention Pieces of the Puzzle: Improving Student Retention and Graduation Rates

Student Retention

The Percent of A/B Grades and D/F Grades in Math 408C '91/'92 to '95/'96

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

91-92 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96

Year

Per

cent

Percent A/BPercent D/F

Page 37: Student Retention Pieces of the Puzzle: Improving Student Retention and Graduation Rates

Student Retention

• Educational policy “traps” when combined with student failure result in high levels of “wheel spinning” by students attempting to improve their grades and enter upper division majors.

Pieces of the PuzzleFact No. 7

Page 38: Student Retention Pieces of the Puzzle: Improving Student Retention and Graduation Rates

Student Retention

Completed No UT Degree &

UT Degree 121+ Total Hrs

% dropped a course 47% 56%

If dropped, avg. hrs dropped 5.3 6.7

% failed a course 27% 51%

If failed, avg. hrs failed 8.0 12.6

Page 39: Student Retention Pieces of the Puzzle: Improving Student Retention and Graduation Rates

Student Retention

• UT Austin can not afford high levels of student success.

• If al the freshmen who entered this fall were academically successful, we would not have the resources to educate them in their junior and senior year.

Pieces of the PuzzleFact No. 8

Page 40: Student Retention Pieces of the Puzzle: Improving Student Retention and Graduation Rates

Student Retention

• The “will” to change the status quo.

• Broaden our focus from just “fixing” students to looking at our total system.

• Put more time, effort and money into the academic classroom.

• Re-evaluate educational policy that limits or restricts student success.

What will it take to change the graduation rates?

Page 41: Student Retention Pieces of the Puzzle: Improving Student Retention and Graduation Rates

Student Retention

Had Enough?

Page 42: Student Retention Pieces of the Puzzle: Improving Student Retention and Graduation Rates

Student Retention

Academic Performance

Retention Rates

Graduation Rates

Page 43: Student Retention Pieces of the Puzzle: Improving Student Retention and Graduation Rates

Student Retention

• Student preparation level improves every year

• Most retention programs improve academic performance and reduce the attrition rate

• The graduation rate has not changed in 30 years

The Graduation Rate Paradox

Page 44: Student Retention Pieces of the Puzzle: Improving Student Retention and Graduation Rates

Student Retention

The Middle 50% of SAT Scores by College of EnrollmentEntering Freshmen - Summer/Fall 1996

1000

1050

1100

1150

1200

1250

1300

1350

1400

1450

Arc

hite

ctu

re

Bu

sin

ess

Co

mm

un

ica

tio

ns

Ed

uca

tio

n

En

gin

ee

rin

g

Fin

e A

rts

Lib

era

l Art

s

Na

tura

lS

cie

nce

s

Nu

rsin

g

So

cia

l W

ork

Page 45: Student Retention Pieces of the Puzzle: Improving Student Retention and Graduation Rates

Student Retention

•86% Get a bachelor’s degree

•71% Make a “B” average

•29% Graduate with honors

% Who said there was a “very good chance” they would . . .

Page 46: Student Retention Pieces of the Puzzle: Improving Student Retention and Graduation Rates

Student Retention

Who comes to UT-Austin?

Demographics

Preparation

Attitudes

Page 47: Student Retention Pieces of the Puzzle: Improving Student Retention and Graduation Rates

Student Retention

The Number of Non-Anglo Undergraduate Students at The University of Texas at Austin - Fall Enrollment

1980 to 1996

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000Hispanic

Asian American

InternationalAfrican American

Page 48: Student Retention Pieces of the Puzzle: Improving Student Retention and Graduation Rates

Student Retention

Student Attitudes

Page 49: Student Retention Pieces of the Puzzle: Improving Student Retention and Graduation Rates

Student Retention

How well prepared are UT Students?

Page 50: Student Retention Pieces of the Puzzle: Improving Student Retention and Graduation Rates

Student Retention

Why Do Students Leave?