type: STUDENT PORTFOLIOlocation: FACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE, SKOPJE, MACEDONIAdate: 2007-2012

FROSINA STOJANOVSKA

1. URBAN PLANNING OF SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL ZONE2. STABLES FOR NOBLE HORSES

3. FAMILY HOUSING FOR VULNERABLE GROUPS - PROTOTYPE OF HOUSE4. URBAN AND ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN FOR RESIDENTIAL BLOCK IN CENTRAL CITY ZONE

5. NEW URBAN BLOCK - SELF-SUFFICIENT URBAN BLOCK

URBA

N PL

ANNING

OF

SUBU

RBAN

RES

IDEN

TIAL

ZON

E20

10/V

I SEM

ESTE

R

type: STUDENT PROJECT

subject: URBAN DESIGN 2

location: GJORCE PETROV, SKOPJE partner: DRAGAN KUSEVSKImentor: PROF. VLATKO P. KOROBAR page1.

FROSINA STOJANOVSKAPROJECT SUMMARY:

THE SITE OF THE PROJECT IS LOCATED IN THE SUBURBS OF SKOPJE. IT IS AN EMPTY LOCATION SURROUNDED BY HOUSESAND SMALL BUILDINGS. THE PLAN PROPOSES TWO FLOOR BUILDINGS ORGANIZED SO THEY CREATE SEMI PUBLIC ANDPUBLIC SPACES. THE BUILDINGS VARIETIES IN HEIGHT SO THEY ENABLE SMOOTHER TRANSITION FROM THE HOUSES TO THEFLATS. THREE TALLER (SIX FLOORS) BUILDINGS ARE LOCATED IN THE NORTH PART, NEAR THE MAIN ROAD.

VARD

AR RI

VER

THE VOLUME IS MADE BY COMBINATING MODULE CUBES (6m x 6m x 6m.)

DIAGRAM - MODELING OFTHE ROAD NETWORK

CONCEPT OF THE URBAN PLAN OF THE ZONE

DIAGRAM - VOLUME MODELINGOF THE BUILDINGS

EXISTING ROAD NETWORK

PENETRATING ROADS TOWARDSTHE RIVER SIDE

SECONDARY ROADS -CONNECTING WITH THE BUILDINGS

1

3

24

1.1

1.8

1.9

1.6

1.3

1.4

1.5

1.2

1.101.7

1.11

2.4

2.3

2.1

2.2

4.1 4.2 4.3

-0.40

-0.40

-0.40

±0.00

+1.00

-0.40

±0.00

+1.00

-0.40

±0.00

-0.40

-0.40

±0.00

-0.20-0.20-0.20

-0.40

3.3

3.7

3.6

3.1

3.2

3.4

3.5

4.4

1

STAB

LES

FOR

NOBL

E HO

RSES

2010/V

II SE

MEST

ER

type: STUDENT PROJECT

subject: ARCHITECTURE DESIGN STUDIO

location: HIPODROM, SKOPJE partner: VIOLETA PEEVAmentor: PROF. GORDANA ATANASOSKA page2.

FROSINA STOJANOVSKAFROSINA STOJANOVSKA PROJECT SUMMARY:

THE STABLES FOR 30 NOBLE HORSES IS LOCATED IN THE SUBURB OF SKOPJE CALLED HIPODROM. THE LOCATION IS IRREGULARLY SHAPED, DEFINED WITHTHE RACING PATHS AND THE STREETS. IN THE COMPLEX ARE INCLUDED HORSE FACILITIES, FOOD STORAGE, ANCILLARY OBJECTS, PAVILIONS FOR TEMPORARYRESIDENCE, RESTAURANT, CLUB AND JOCKEYS ROOMS, INDOOR AND OUTDOOR RIDING SPACE. THE TRIBINE AND THE TENNIS COURTS ARE KEEPED AS THEYWERE. THERE IS CONTRAST WITH THE USAGE OF THE MATERIALS MAKING CLEAR DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE PUBLIC AND "PRIVATE" SPACES.

EAST VIEW

SOUTH VIEW

NORTH VIEW

CONCEPT OF THE URBAN AND ARCHITECTURE DESIGN OF THE STABLE COMPLEX

FAMILY

HOU

SING

FOR

VUL

NERA

BLE

GROU

PS -

PRO

TOTY

PE O

F HO

USE

2011/V

III SE

MEST

ER

type: STUDENT PROJECT

subject: ARCHITECTURE WORKSHOP

location: ZLOKUKJANI, SKOPJE partner: SANJA STOJKOVAmentor: PROF. GOCE ADZI-MITREVSKI

PROJECT SUMMARY:

THE MAIN IDEA OF THE DESIGN IS TO ANSWER THE NEEDS OF DIFFERENT FAMILIES FROM THE VULNERABLE GROUP OF CITIZENS. ALL OF THE FAMILIES MOSTLYWORK AT HOME AND HAVE 3 OR 4 CHILDREN. THEREFORE THE HOUSE HAS TO BE SMALL BUT COMPLEX, CHEEP FOR CONSTRUCTION, AND TO BE MADE ASMODULE THAT CAN BE PLACED ON DIFFERENT LOCATIONS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD. ONE UNIT IS WITH DIMENSIONS 12 X 12 X 4 meters. THE SPACE CAN BEMODIFIED FOR DAY AND NIGHT USING SIMPLY BY MOVING THE WOODEN PARTITION WALLS AND THE FURNITURE. THE MULTIFUNCTIONAL SHAPE CAN ANSWER TOTHE DAILY NEEDS SUCH AS WORKING, COOKING, EATING, WATCHING TV, LEARNING AND THE NIGHT NEEDS, SEPARATING THE KIDS FROM THE PARENTS FORSLEEPING. page3.

FROSINA STOJANOVSKA FROSINA STOJANOVSKA

2a

2a

2b

2b

9

9

A

A

0 1 2 3 4 5m

DAILY USAGEONE WHOLE SPACE

NIGHT USAGESEPARATE ROOMS

WALL - CONCRETE BLOCKS

WOODEN ROOF CONSTRUCTION

MULTIFUNCTIONAL FURNITURE

MOVING WOODEN WALLS

PORCH FOR WORKING AND RESTING

YARD

DIAGRAM - CONCEPT EXPLANATION

MOVING WOODEN WALLSYARD public place:- STORAGES- GARDENS

PORCH semi-public place:- RESTING- SUMMER COOKING PLACE- WORKINGplace that can be closed if there is need

transforming furniture

ROOM private space:- PARENTS ROOM- GRANDPARENTS ROOM- KIDS ROOM FOR GIRLS- KIDS ROOM FOR BOYS

HOUSE private space:- LIVING AND WORKING ROOM

- DINING ROOM- KITCHEN

- BATHROOM

CONCRETE BLOCK WALLS:forming one whole closed space

DIAGRAM - DAY AND NIGHT USINGFLEXIBLE SPACE: MIXING AND DISTINCTION THE ACTIVITIES

3.

URBA

N AN

D AR

CHITEC

TURA

L DE

SIGN

FOR

RES

IDEN

TIAL

BLO

CK IN

CEN

TRAL

CITY

ZONE

2011/IX

SEM

ESTE

R

type: STUDENT PROJECT

subject: INTEGRATION STUDIO

location: GJORCE PETROV, SKOPJE partners: VIOLETA PEEVASANJA STOJKOVA

mentor: PROF. ZORICA BLAZEVSKA

PROJECT SUMMARY:

THE LOCATION OF THE PROJECT IS IN TRADITIONAL MACEDONIAN NEIGHBORHOOD WITH SMALL HOUSES AND ACTIVE NEIGHBORHOOD LIFE. THEMAIN IDEA OF THE DESIGN IS TO ANSWER THE NEW NEEDS THAT HUMANS HAVE TODAY, BY NOT VIOLATING THE OLD HABITS OF THE PEOPLEAND BY USING MODERN ARCHITECTURE DESIGN AND MATERIALS. SO THERE FORE THE SHAPE IS ARRANGED SO IT CAN PRODUCE A PLACE FORLIVING - PRIVATE SPACE, AND PLACE FOR ACTIVITIES SO CALLED SOCIAL FILTER THAT IS IN THE PROGRAM PLACE OF THE OLD HOUSE YARDS.

page4.FROSINA STOJANOVSKA FROSINA STOJANOVSKA

TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD ....MODERN TIME... losing the neighborhoods lifestyle

HYBRID - NEW HOOD = MODERN + TRADITIONAL

SOCIAL FILTEROUTSIDE PRIVATE LIFE SHAPE DIAGRAM saved buildings urban block in tendentionfor closing up

housing, private life - inwardssocial filter - outside

HOUSING

SOCIAL FILTER-cohesion between the neighbors....

(public and semi public programs)

HOUSING, PRIVATE LIFE

SOCIAL FILTER, SEMI PUBLIC

PROGRAM DIAGRAM

4.

NEW U

RBAN

BLO

CK -

SEL

F-SU

FFICIENT

URB

AN B

LOCK

2012/X

SEM

ESTE

R

type: STUDENT PROJECT

subject: MASTER THESIS AND PROJECT

location: KARPOSH, SKOPJE mentor: PROF. DIVNA PENCIC

PROJECT SUMMARY:

THE PROJECT INCLUDES SPACE IN THE EDGE OF THE CITY, THAT IS DEFINE IN THREE BLOCKS. IN THIS PLACE THE PEOPLE WILL WORK, LIVE, EAT,LEARN, RECREATE. THIS SOLUTION OFFERS MICRO IN THE EXISTING MACRO COSMOS. AT A TIME WHEN THE NON-RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES AREIN LOSS, THE PEOPLE IN THIS BLOCKS WILL BE TRYING TO MINIMIZE THEIR CONSUMPTION. THE CONCEPT OF A COMBINATION OF NATURE ANDMODERN ARCHITECTURE IS THE POSSIBLE ANSWER TO THE PROBLEM THAT WE ARE TRYING TO SOLVE, THIS, AND THE CONNECTION WITH THETRADITION OF LIVE AND THE MENTALITY OF THE PEOPLE FOR WHOM WE DESIGN OR PLAN.

page5.FROSINA STOJANOVSKA FROSINA STOJANOVSKA

ATHLETES- EDUCATION -FACULTY/LIBRARY- GUM

FAMILIES WITHKIDS

COUPLES

STUDENTS

PENS

IONE

RS

SPOR

TPR

OFES

SION

ALS

SINGLEPARENTS

0.0

0

0.00

0.0

0

0.00

0.0

0

0.4

5

+3.4

5

-3.0

0

0.0

0

0.00

0.00

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.00

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.0

0

0.00

0.0

0

0.00

0.00

0.0

0

0.0

0

DIAGRAMS - USERS AND PROGRAM WHOLES

SINGLES

RESIDENTS

STUDENTS- EDUCATION -FACULTY/LIBRARY- STUDENT HOUSING- GUM- PUBLIC KITCHEN

- LEISURELY ACTIVITIES

PENSIONERS-HOUSE-LEISURELY ACTIVITIES- PUBLIC KITCHEN-CARRYING CENTER

HOTEL/HOSTEL-ATHLETES- FUNS AND WINDERS

VISITORS

ECONOMIC INPUTS- AMBULANCE- GAS STATION- STORES

EDUCATION- FACULTY- KINDERGARTEN- HIGH SCHOOL- LIBRARYHOUSING

- RESIDENTIAL BUILDING- PRIVATE HOUSE- STUDENT RESIDENTIALBUILDING- HOSTEL-HOTEL

CARE

FOR

THE

LIVING

ENVIRO

NMEN

T-

RETICU

LATION

SINGLES- BUILDING/APARTMANT

- PUBLIC KITCHEN

FAMILIES- HOUSE- PLAYGROUND- KINDERGARTEN- SCHOOL

URBANAGRICULTURE- COLLECTIVE GARDENS- PRIVATE YARDS- ROOF GARDENING- WALL GARDENINGRECREATION

- PARKS- PLAYGROUNDS- RUNNING PATHS- SPORTING FIELDS

DIAGRAMS - MAIN IDEA FOR DEVELOPING THE SELF- SUFFICIENT NEIGHBORHOOD

ECONOMICЈUSTIFICATION

SOCIALEQUALITY

CAREFOR THE

ENVIRONMENT

RURAL /NOT CITY CITY

URBANBLOCK

NEW

RU-RBANDEVELOPMENT

SELF-SUFFICIENT

SPECIFICGROUP OFPEOPLE

CONCEPT OF THE URBAN PLAN OF THE THREE BLOCKS

EASTERN VIEW

SOUTH VIEW

VARDAR RIVER

RURBAN