stereotypes - a brief history

28
Stereotypes - A Brief History Dramatic Decrease in Expression of Stereotypes Katz & Braly (1933) and replications Survey Results Despite this evidence subtler forms of stereotyping still evident Sagar & Schofield - Pencil poking study Word, Zanna, & Cooper (1974) - interview study Darley & Gross (1983) - SES and performance Rogers & Prentice-Dunn - Insult study Dovidio & Gaertner’s Aversive Racism Explanation Helping Study Inadmissable Evidence Study

Upload: ormand

Post on 09-Feb-2016

36 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Stereotypes - A Brief History. Dramatic Decrease in Expression of Stereotypes Katz & Braly (1933) and replications Survey Results Despite this evidence subtler forms of stereotyping still evident Sagar & Schofield - Pencil poking study Word, Zanna, & Cooper (1974) - interview study - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Stereotypes - A Brief History

Stereotypes -A Brief History

• Dramatic Decrease in Expression of Stereotypes– Katz & Braly (1933) and replications– Survey Results

• Despite this evidence subtler forms of stereotyping still evident– Sagar & Schofield - Pencil poking study– Word, Zanna, & Cooper (1974) - interview study– Darley & Gross (1983) - SES and performance– Rogers & Prentice-Dunn - Insult study

• Dovidio & Gaertner’s Aversive Racism Explanation– Helping Study– Inadmissable Evidence Study

Page 2: Stereotypes - A Brief History

Stereotypes of Blacks in Four Generations

1933 1951 1967 1982

Superstitious 84% 41% 13% 6%Lazy 75% 31% 26% 13%Ignorant 38% 24% 11% 10%Happy-go-lucky 38% 17% 27%15%Musical 26% 33% 47% 29%Ostentatious 26% 11% 25% 5%Very Religious24% 17% 8% 23%Stupid 22% 10% 4% 1%

Page 3: Stereotypes - A Brief History

Stereotypes of Jews in Three Generations

1933 1951 1967

Shrewd 79% 47% 30%Mercenary 49% 28% 15%Industrious 48% 29% 33%Grasping 34% 17% 17%Intelligent 29% 37% 37%Ambitious 21% 28% 48%

Page 4: Stereotypes - A Brief History

Survey Results Indicating Prejudice

Percent saying "Yes"

020406080

100

1960 1970 1980 1990Would you move if Blacks moved into your neighborhoodShould Whites be able to keep Blacks out

Page 5: Stereotypes - A Brief History

Rogers & Prentice-Dunn (1981)

Intensity of Shock

75

100

125

150

175

No Insult Insult

Black "Victim"White "Victim"

Page 6: Stereotypes - A Brief History

Seeking Help from Others and Aversive Racism

Percent Helping

30405060708090

African-American European-American

Help OfferedHelp Solicited

Page 7: Stereotypes - A Brief History

The Weighting of Inadmissable Evidence and Aversive Racism

Rated Guilt

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

African-American European-American

Without EvidenceWith Evidence

Page 8: Stereotypes - A Brief History

Recent Models

• Devine (1989) - The argument– Study 1 - everyone knows the stereotype– Study 2 - everyone automatically activates the

stereotype– Study 3 - low prejudice people but not high prejudice

people control the application of the stereotype• Does everyone automatically activate the

stereotype?– Lepore & Brown (1997) - category does not

automatically activate the stereotype for all people– Fazio et al. (1995) - there are reliable difference in

how people automatically activate the stereotype

Page 9: Stereotypes - A Brief History

Stereotype Activation

• Do people automatically activate stereotypes?– It depends on what you mean by automatic;

without awareness yes; without intention, yes; without effort, no•Gilbert & Hixon (1991)•Spencer, Fein, Wolfe, Fong, & Hodgson

(1998); Study 2– It depends on people’s motivation - when

motivated to stereotype effort is not needed either•Spencer, Fein, Wolfe, Fong, & Hodgson

(1998); Studies 1 & 3

Page 10: Stereotypes - A Brief History

Gilbert & Hixon

# of Ster. Completions

2

3

4

Not Busy BusyCognitive Busyness Condition

Asian AssistantWhite Assistant

Page 11: Stereotypes - A Brief History

Spencer et al. (1998) - Study 3

# of Ster. Completions

00.20.40.60.8

11.2

African-American European-AmericanEthnicity of the Prime

Positive FeedbackNegative Feedback

Page 12: Stereotypes - A Brief History

Stereotype Inhibition

• Activation of another stereotype can lead to stereotype inhibition– Macrae, Bodenhausen, & Milne (1995)

• When motivated to inhibit stereotypes they are inhibited– Sinclair & Kunda (1998)

Page 13: Stereotypes - A Brief History

Stereotype Application

• Can people control their use of stereotypes - this is actually trickier than you might think– Macrae, Bodenhausen, Milne, & Jetten (1994) - stereotypes

on the rebound• Motivated application of stereotypes

– Fein & Spencer (1997)•Study 1 - self-affirmation and stereotype

application•Study 2 - negative feedback and stereotype

application•Study 3 - feeling better about yourself after

stereotyping

Page 14: Stereotypes - A Brief History

Fein & Spencer (1997) - Study 1

Rating of Target

5060708090

100

Jewish ItalianEthnicity of the Target

Self-AffirmedNot Self-Affirmed

Page 15: Stereotypes - A Brief History

Fein & Spencer (1997) - Study 2

Rating of Target

5

5.5

6

6.5

7

Gay StraightSexual Orientation of the Target

Neutral FeedbackNegative Feedback

Page 16: Stereotypes - A Brief History

Fein & Spencer (1997) - Study 3Stereotyping

Rating of Target

50

60

70

80

90

Jewish ItalianEthnicity of the Target

Positive FeedbackNegative Feedback

Page 17: Stereotypes - A Brief History

Fein & Spencer (1997) - Study 3 Self-Esteem Change

Change in Self-Esteem

012345

Jewish ItalianEthnicity of the Target

Positive FeedbackNegative Feedback

Page 18: Stereotypes - A Brief History

The Target’s Perspective -Attributional Ambiguity

• Stigma and Self-Esteem– The findings– The explanations

•Attributions to prejudice•Disengagement•Within group comparisons

• Crocker, Voelkl, Testa, & Major (1991) - Blinds up/Blinds down study

• Major, Spencer, Schmader, Wolfe, & Crocker (1997) - Priming bias leads to disengagement

Page 19: Stereotypes - A Brief History

Major, et al. (1997) - Study 2

Self-Esteem after Failure

5

5.25

5.5

5.75

6

Blacks Whites

Race PrimeNo Race Prime

Page 20: Stereotypes - A Brief History

Target’s Perspective -Stereotype Threat

• What is stereotype threat?• Its relation to academic performance• Steele & Aronson (1995)

– Study 1 - the effects of test diagnosticity– Study 2 - relation to stereotype activation and avoidance– Study 3 - the effect of the subtle priming of race

• Spencer, Steele, & Quinn (1998) - stereotype threat and women’s math performance

• Stereotypic commericals and women’s math performance

• Steele, Spencer, Hummel, Schoem, & Nisbett (1998) - stereotype threat in the real world

Page 21: Stereotypes - A Brief History

A Model of the Origin and Effects of Stereotype Threat

Cultural Stereotype Stereotype Threat

Performance Deficits

Disidentification withStereotyped Domains

Page 22: Stereotypes - A Brief History

Steele & Aronson (1995) -Study 1

Score on Test

2

4

6

8

10

12

Diagnostic Non-diagnostic

Whites Blacks

Page 23: Stereotypes - A Brief History

Steele & Aronson (1995) -Study 2

Stereotype Activation

0

1

2

3

4

Diagnostic Non-diagnostic Control

Whites Blacks

Page 24: Stereotypes - A Brief History

Steele & Aronson (1995) -Study 2

Stereotype Avoidance

15

20

25

30

35

40

Diagnostic Non-diagnostic Control

Whites Blacks

Page 25: Stereotypes - A Brief History

Steele & Aronson (1995) -Study 3

Score on Test

2

4

6

8

10

12

Race Primed Race not Primed

Whites Blacks

Page 26: Stereotypes - A Brief History

Spencer, et al. (in preparation)

Score on Test

0

10

20

30

40

Stereotypic Counter-StereotypicType of Commercial

Men Women

Page 27: Stereotypes - A Brief History

Steele, et al. (1998)First Semester GPA

22.22.42.62.8

33.2

Control Group Program Participants

European-AmericansAfrican-Americans

Page 28: Stereotypes - A Brief History

Changing Stereotypes

• The Contact hypothesis– The evidence is now in that it works– Factors that make it work better

•between group friendships are particularly important•endorsement of integration by authorities•no inter-group competition•equal status among students

• The Robber’s Cave Studies• Jigsaw Classroom and Superordinate Goals• Subtyping as a limit on the effectiveness of contact

– Kunda & Oleson (1995) - using information to subtype– Kunda & Oleson (1997) - extreme people get subtyped