statistics norway, ssb election survey 2009 norway · 2019-07-09 · data collection mode telephone...

356
Norway Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Study Documentation August 6, 2012

Upload: others

Post on 24-Mar-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Norway

Statistics Norway, SSB

Election Survey 2009

Study Documentation

August 6, 2012

Page 2: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Metadata ProductionMetadata Producer(s) Norwegian Social Science Data Services (NSD)

Production Date August 10, 2011

Version

Identification NSD1487

Page 3: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Table of ContentsOverview............................................................................................................................................................. 4Scope & Coverage.............................................................................................................................................. 4Producers & Sponsors.........................................................................................................................................4Sampling..............................................................................................................................................................4Data Collection....................................................................................................................................................5Accessibility........................................................................................................................................................ 5Rights & Disclaimer........................................................................................................................................... 5Files Description................................................................................................................................................. 7

NSD1487......................................................................................................................................... 7Variables Group(s).............................................................................................................................................. 8

All variables.................................................................................................................................... 8Background variables....................................................................................................................33Income and work.......................................................................................................................... 34Political affiliation.........................................................................................................................35Political interest/participation....................................................................................................... 40Voting............................................................................................................................................41Political attitudes...........................................................................................................................44Attitudes towards politicians........................................................................................................ 52Evaluation of previous government..............................................................................................53Left-right scale.............................................................................................................................. 53Knowledge of politics...................................................................................................................54Economic situation........................................................................................................................55Trust...............................................................................................................................................56The election campaign..................................................................................................................57Organisation membership............................................................................................................. 57Language and teetotalism............................................................................................................. 57Religiosity..................................................................................................................................... 58Media use...................................................................................................................................... 58Technical variables....................................................................................................................... 60

Variables Description........................................................................................................................................61NSD1487....................................................................................................................................... 62

Page 4: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Overview

- 4 -

Election Survey 2009

Overview

Type Norwegian Election Studies

Identification NSD1487

Version Production Date: 2011-08-10NotesOriginal data from Statistics Norway are documented and prepared, first NSD-version.

Series The Norwegian Election Research Programme was launched in the middle of the 1950's, under thedirection of The Institute for Social Research. Henry Valen and Stein Rokkan were responsible forthe programme. The programme co-operated with Norsk Gallup Institute A/S for sample surveydata collection in the election studies covering the Storting elections in 1957, 1965, 1969 and 1973.Since 1977 the programme has co-operated with Statistics Norway (SSB) for the data collectionfor these studies. The election studies are intended to give statistical data for research coveringelections and political processes in Norway. Since the start of the Norwegian Election ProgrammeProfessor Henry Valen has been the key administrator, but in 1985 Bernt Aardal took over asexecutive manager.

AbstractFor access to the dataset, use the NSD application form:

http://www.nsd.uib.no/nsd/english/orderform.html

Kind of Data Survey data

Unit of Analysis Individual

Scope & Coverage

Keywords Policy, Elections, Political attitudes, Political participation, Voting, Political parties, Mass media,Mass media use

Topics Mass political behaviour, attitudes/opinion, Elections

Time Period(s) 2009-2010

Countries Norway

Geographic CoverageCountry

UniversePersons between 18-80 years.

Producers & Sponsors

PrimaryInvestigator(s)

Statistics Norway, SSB

Other Producer(s) Statistics Norway (SSB)

Funding Agency/ies Statistics Norway (SSB)

Sampling

Page 5: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Overview

- 5 -

Sampling ProcedureThe survey sample consisted of 3 000 person in the age between 18-80 years. Half of this where respondents that hadbeen interviewed in the Election Study 2005, and makes therefore the panel-sample. Due to the number of non-eligiblerespondents in this sample, it was supplemented by immigrants and younger persons in the age 18-21.

The other half was cross sectional, and consisted of 1 500 respondents that were drawn randomly. These will constitutethe panel for the election in 2013. The sample was drawn using Statistics Norway's standard sampling frame. The standardsampling frame firstly divides the country into a number of primary sampling areas, which in turn are divided into 109subpopulations, called strata. The sampling areas are municipalities, or groups of municipalities. Municipalities with fewinhabitants are grouped together with other municipalities to ensure that each sampling area consists of at least 7 percentof the total number of inhabitants in the stratum the municipality belongs to. All municipalities with more than 30 000inhabitants and some with 25 000 to 30 000 inhabitants constitute separate strata.

Gross sample: 2944Net sample: 1782Response rate: 61 %

WeightingNo weighting necessary.

Data Collection

Data Collection Dates start 2009-09-14end 2010-02-08

Time Period(s) start 2009end 2009

Data Collection Mode Telephone interview

Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB)

Accessibility

Distributor(s) Norwegian Social Science Data Services

Access ConditionsApplication for access to the data has to include name, institutional affiliation, project title, information about sources offinancing, postal address. A declaration of secrecy has to be signed before delivery of data.

Citation RequirementsUsers are obliged to refer to producer and distributor of the data by writing the following in forewords or footnotes ineventual publications:"(Some of) the data applied in the analysis in this publication are based on "Election Survey 2009". The data are providedby Statistics Norway (SSB), and prepared and made available by the Norwegian Social Science Data Services (NSD).Prof. Bernt Aardal and the Institute of Social Reserach (ISF) were responsible for the original study and Statistics Norwaycollected the data. Neither Bernt Aardal, ISF, SSB nor NSD are responsible for the analyses/interpretation of the datapresented here."

Rights & Disclaimer

DisclaimerNeither Bernt Aardal, Institute of Social Reserach, Statistics Norway nor NSD are responsible for the analysis/interpretationof the data presented here.

Page 6: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Overview

- 6 -

Copyright Copyright (C) 2011 Statistics Norway

Page 7: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Files Description

- 7 -

Files DescriptionDataset contains 1 file(s)

NSD1487

# Cases 1782

# Variable(s) 293

Page 8: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Variables Group(s)

- 8 -

Variables Group(s)Dataset contains 19 group(s)

Group All variables

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

1 v001 R's age at the time ofinterview

continuous numeric-2.0 1782 0 R's age at the time of interview

2 v002 R's age group, time ofinterview

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 R's age group, time of interview

3 v003 R's gender continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 R's gender

4 v004 Political interest continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Let us begin with a question dealingwith political interest. Would you saythat you are …

5 v005 How often talked about theelection

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 We would like to hear whether youhave participated in political discussionsor talks before the election this year.How often did you talk about theelection in the family or with friends andacquaintances. Would you say about ...

6 v006 Cared about which partyor parties won or lost theelection

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Looking back on the election this fall,would you say that you personally careda great deal about which party or partieswon or lost the election, did you care tosome degree, or didn't it matter to youpersonally?

7 v007 1. issue important for voting discrete character-40 1760 0 Can you name one or two issues whichhad particular influence on the way youvoted? ... A. Issue 1

8 v008 2. issue important for voting discrete character-40 1476 0 Can you name one or two issues whichhad particular influence on the way youvoted? ... B. Issue 2

9 v009 Norway's aid to developingcountries

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Some people think that the amount ofaid Norway gives to poor countries,the so-called developing countries,should be cut back, while others believeit should be maintained at the presentlevel, or even increased. What is yourposition, do you think that the amountof aid Norway gives to the developingcountries should be cut back, should itbe maintained at the present level, orshould it be increased?

10 v010 View on alcohol regulations continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 In this country, as you know, the publicauthorities have put into effect manyregulations governing the use of alcohol.How do you regard these regulations: doyou consider them to be too severe, ordo you fell they are too lenient?

11 v011 The old and well proven isbetter than new-fangled ideas

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Now we come to a number of opinionswhich are sometimes heard to beexpressed. For each of the followingstatements that I read out, can you tellme whether you react with the completeagreement, qualified agreement,qualified disagreement, or completedisagreement? ... A. The old and

Page 9: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Variables Group(s)

- 9 -

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

well proven is usually better thannew-fangled ideas.

12 v012 Should allow oil andgas extraction, Lofoten,Vesterålen.

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Now we come to a number of opinionswhich are sometimes heard to beexpressed. For each of the followingstatements that I read out, can you tellme whether you react with the completeagreement, qualified agreement,qualified disagreement, or completedisagreement? ... B. We should allow oiland gas extraction outside Lofoten andVesterålen.

13 v013 Too little emphasis onenvironmental protection

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Now we come to a number of opinionswhich are sometimes heard to beexpressed. For each of the followingstatements that I read out, can you tellme whether you react with the completeagreement, qualified agreement,qualified disagreement, or completedisagreement? ... C. There is too littleemphasis on environmental protection intoday's Norway.

14 v014 Immigration represents agrave threat to our nation'scharacter

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Now we come to a number of opinionswhich are sometimes heard to beexpressed. For each of the followingstatements that I read out, can you tellme whether you react with the completeagreement, qualified agreement,qualified disagreement, or completedisagreement? ... D. Immigrationrepresents a grave threat to our nation'scharacter

15 v015 Full employment- the statemore influence

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Now we come to a number of opinionswhich are sometimes heard to beexpressed. For each of the followingstatements that I read out, can you tellme whether you react with the completeagreement, qualified agreement,qualified disagreement, or completedisagreement? ... E. Full employmentcan be more easily secured if the stategets more impact over the banks 'andcompanies' business.

16 v016 Open for considerablereductions of duties and taxes

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Now we come to a number of opinionswhich are sometimes heard to beexpressed. For each of the followingstatements that I read out, can youtell me whether you react withthe complete agreement, qualifiedagreement, qualified disagreement,or complete disagreement? ... F. Thecurrent economic situation is open forconsiderable reductions of duties andtaxes

17 v017 Banks and industry will havetoo much influence.

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Now we come to a number of opinionswhich are sometimes heard to beexpressed. For each of the followingstatements that I read out, can you tellme whether you react with the completeagreement, qualified agreement,qualified disagreement, or completedisagreement? ... G. If the communitycan't control the private industry, the

Page 10: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Variables Group(s)

- 10 -

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

leaders of banks and industry will havetoo much influence.

18 v018 Not take much account ofwhat ordinary people think

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Now we come to a number of opinionswhich are sometimes heard to beexpressed. For each of the followingstatements that I read out, can you tellme whether you react with the completeagreement, qualified agreement,qualified disagreement, or completedisagreement? ... H. Those who sit in theStorting does not take much account ofwhat ordinary people think and believe.

19 v019 Best party on schools andeducation

continuous numeric-2.0 1517 265 We would like to hear how you feelabout the parties' policy on some currentissues. The question is in each casewhich party you consider to have thebest policy - given that you have anopinion on the matter. ... A. Firstly, it'sabout schools and education. Whichparty has, in your opinion, the bestpolicy within this area?

20 v020 Best party when it comes toduty and taxation

continuous numeric-2.0 1560 222 We would like to hear how you feelabout the parties' policy on some currentissues. The question is in each casewhich party you consider to have thebest policy - given that you have anopinion on the matter. ... B. Then it isduty and taxation. Which party has, inyour opinion, the best policy within thisarea?

21 v021 Best party when it comes toimmigration

continuous numeric-2.0 1576 206 We would like to hear how you feelabout the parties' policy on some currentissues. The question is in each casewhich party you consider to have thebest policy - given that you have anopinion on the matter. ... C. When itcomes to immigration. Which party has,in your opinion, the best policy?

22 v022 Best party regardingenvironment conservation

continuous numeric-2.0 1501 281 We would like to hear how you feelabout the parties' policy on some currentissues. The question is in each casewhich party you consider to have thebest policy - given that you have anopinion on the matter. ... D. Regardingconservation of the environment. Whatparty has in your opinion the bestpolicy?

23 v023 Best party when it comes totaking care of the elderly

continuous numeric-2.0 1433 349 We would like to hear how you feelabout the parties' policy on some currentissues. The question is in each casewhich party you consider to have thebest policy - given that you have anopinion on the matter. ... E. When itcomes to taking care of the elderly;which party has, in your opinion, thebest policy?

24 v024 Best party when it comes totransport policy

continuous numeric-2.0 1402 380 We would like to hear how you feelabout the parties' policy on some currentissues. The question is in each casewhich party you consider to have thebest policy - given that you have anopinion on the matter. ... F. When it

Page 11: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Variables Group(s)

- 11 -

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

comes to transport policy; which partyhas, in your opinion, the best policy?

25 v025 Best party on issuesconcerning children andfamily

continuous numeric-2.0 1487 295 We would like to hear how you feelabout the parties' policy on some currentissues. The question is in each casewhich party you consider to have thebest policy - given that you have anopinion on the matter. ... G. Issuesconcerning children and family. Whichparty has, in your opinion, the bestpolicy?

26 v026 Best party regarding regionalpolicy

continuous numeric-2.0 1423 359 We would like to hear how you feelabout the parties' policy on some currentissues. The question is in each casewhich party you consider to have thebest policy - given that you have anopinion on the matter. ... H. Regardingregional policy. Which party has, inyour opinion, the best policy?

27 v027 Best party regarding fightingunemployment

continuous numeric-2.0 1520 262 We would like to hear how you feelabout the parties' policy on some currentissues. The question is in each casewhich party you consider to have thebest policy - given that you have anopinion on the matter. ... I. Regardingfighting unemployment; Which partyhas, in your opinion, the best policy?

28 v028 Environmental protection continuous numeric-2.0 1764 18 First, we have the issue concerningnature conservation and environmentalprotection. The value 0 expresses thedesire that environmental protectionmeasures should not be taken so far asto affect our standard of living, whilethe value 10 expresses the desire to seemore done for environmental protection,even if it means a considerablereduction in the standard of living foreverybody, yourself included. Wherewould you place yourself on this scale,or have you not you given this issuemuch thought?

29 v029 Norwegian immigrationpolicy

continuous numeric-2.0 1782 0 Then there is the question of Norwegianimmigration policy. The value 0expresses the view that we shouldmake it easier for immigrants toenter Norway; while the value 10expresses the opinion that the number ofimmigrants coming to Norway shouldbe restricted to an even greater extentthan at present. Where would you placeyourself on this scale, or haven't yougiven much thought to this issue?

30 v030 Religious education continuous numeric-2.0 1782 0 Where would you place yourself on ascale from 0 to 10 where 0 expresses theview that the teaching of Christianityshould be compulsory in primaryschool, while 10 expresses the view thatthe teaching of Christianity should bevoluntary in primary school?

31 v031 Peripheral areas continuous numeric-2.0 1782 0 Where would you place yourself ona scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0means that the central Government isalready paying too much attention to the

Page 12: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Variables Group(s)

- 12 -

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

needs of peripheral areas, whereas 10means that the central Government doesnot pay enough attention to the needs ofperipheral areas?

32 v032 EU membership continuous numeric-2.0 1782 0 Where would you place yourself ona scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0signifies the desire that Norway shoulddefinitely not be a member of the EU,whilst 10 signifies that Norway shoulddefinitely become a member.

33 v033 Climate change continuous numeric-2.0 1765 17 Over to your opinion on climate change.Where would you place yourself ona scale ranging from 0 to 10, where0 means that climate change is not aproblem, whereas 10 means that climatechange is a major problem?

34 v034 Big cities should keepsignifically more of theirown tax income

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 For each of the statements that I read,can you tell me whether you reactwith complete agreement, qualifiedagreement, qualified disagreement,or complete disagreement? ... A. Bigcities should keep significally more oftheir own tax income than what they arepresently allowed to.

35 v035 We should invest more inwind power

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 For each of the statements that I read,can you tell me whether you reactwith complete agreement, qualifiedagreement, qualified disagreement,or complete disagreement? ... B. Weshould invest more in wind power.

36 v036 Reduce economic differences continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 For each of the statements that I read,can you tell me whether you reactwith complete agreement, qualifiedagreement, qualified disagreement, orcomplete disagreement? ... C. Economicdifferences are still so large that in thiscountry the government must see it as amain task to reduce them.

37 v037 Politics is often socomplicated

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 For each of the statements that I read,can you tell me whether you reactwith complete agreement, qualifiedagreement, qualified disagreement, orcomplete disagreement? ... D. Politicsis often so complicated that ordinarycitizens cannot understand what is goingon.

38 v038 The church should beseparated from the state

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 For each of the statements that I read,can you tell me whether you reactwith complete agreement, qualifiedagreement, qualified disagreement,or complete disagreement? ... E. Thechurch should be separated from thestate.

39 v039 The settlement on cashbenefit should be removed

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 For each of the statements that I read,can you tell me whether you reactwith complete agreement, qualifiedagreement, qualified disagreement,or complete disagreement? ... F. Thesettlement on cash benefit should beremoved.

Page 13: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Variables Group(s)

- 13 -

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

40 v040 Norwegian jobs beforereduction of greenhouse gasemission

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 For each of the statements that I read,can you tell me whether you reactwith complete agreement, qualifiedagreement, qualified disagreement,or complete disagreement? ... G. Theconsideration to Norwegian jobs is moreimportant than reducing the emission ofgreenhouse gases.

41 v041 Should strengthen theNorwegian Armed Forces

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 For each of the statements that I read,can you tell me whether you reactwith complete agreement, qualifiedagreement, qualified disagreement,or complete disagreement? ... H. Weshould strengthen the Norwegian ArmedForces in the years ahead.

42 v042 Part of the governemnt: AP continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Do you happen to which partieshave been in government in the lastparliamentary term? ... A. The LaborParty

43 v043 Part of the governemnt: SV continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Do you happen to which partieshave been in government in the lastparliamentary term? ... B. The SocialLeft Party

44 v044 Part of the governemnt: SP continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Do you happen to which partieshave been in government in the lastparliamentary term? ... C. The CenterParty

45 v045 Part of the governemnt:Other answers

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Do you happen to which partieshave been in government in the lastparliamentary term? ... D. Other anwers

46 v046 Controversial areas oil/gas:Lofoten

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 In recent years there has beendisagreement about the development ofnew fields of oil and gas exploration onthe Norwegian continental shelf. Canyou say the two areas that have beenparticularly controversial? ... A. Lofoten

47 v047 Controversial areas oil/gas:Vesterålen

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 In recent years there has beendisagreement about the developmentof new fields of oil and gas explorationon the Norwegian continental shelf.Can you say the two areas that havebeen particularly controversial? ... B.Vesterålen

48 v048 Controversial areas oil/gas:Other answers

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 In recent years there has beendisagreement about the development ofnew fields of oil and gas exploration onthe Norwegian continental shelf. Canyou say the two areas that have beenparticularly controversial? ... C. Andresvar

49 v049 Minister of Transport andCommunications: Liv SigneNavarsete

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Do you know who has been Minister ofTransport and Communications for thelast year before the election, and whichparty the concerned represent? ... A. LivSigne Navarsete

50 v050 Minister of Transport andCommunications: SP

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Do you know who has been Minister ofTransport and Communications for thelast year before the election, and whichparty the concerned represent? ... B. TheCenter Party

Page 14: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Variables Group(s)

- 14 -

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

51 v051 Minister of Transport andCommunications: Otheranswers

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Do you know who has been Minister ofTransport and Communications for thelast year before the election, and whichparty the concerned represent? ... C.Other answers

52 v052 Opposed same-sex marriage:FrP

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Which two parties opposed the law thatallows marriage between two of thesame sex? ... A. The Progress Party

53 v053 Opposed same-sex marriage:Krf

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Which two parties opposed the law thatallows marriage between two of thesame sex? ... B. The Christian People'sparty

54 v054 Opposed same-sex marriage:Other answers

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Which two parties opposed the law thatallows marriage between two of thesame sex? ... C. Other answers

55 v055 Signed your name under anyappeal, protest, petition

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 We now turn to a number of questionsconcerning various political activitiesin which it is possible to participate.During the course of the past four years,have you: ... A. signed your name underany appeal, protest, petition, etc. inorder to advance a particular politicalcause?

56 v056 Written through internet,e-mail or text-message

continuous numeric-1.0 502 1280 Did any of this happen through internet,e-mail or text-message?

57 v057 Taken part in anydemonstration/action

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 We now turn to a number of questionsconcerning various political activitiesin which it is possible to participate.During the course of the past fouryears, have you: ... B. Taken part in anydemonstration/action etc. to advance aparticular cause?

58 v058 Written to newspaper toadvance political cause

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 We now turn to a number of questionsconcerning various political activitiesin which it is possible to participate.During the course of the past fouryears, have you: ... C. Written tosome newspaper in order to advance aparticular political cause?

59 v059 Taken up a particular issuewithin a political party

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 We now turn to a number of questionsconcerning various political activitiesin which it is possible to participate.During the course of the past four years,have you: ... D. Taken up a particularissue within a political party, tradeunion, or other organizations?

60 v060 Forwarded any writtencomplaints tot he authorities

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 We now turn to a number of questionsconcerning various political activitiesin which it is possible to participate.During the course of the past four years,have you: ... E. forwarded any writtencomplaints, presented other politicalproposals etc. to the authorities?

61 v061 Written through internet,e-mail or text-message

continuous numeric-1.0 152 1630 Did any of this happen through internet,e-mail or text-message?

62 v062 Boycotted products forpolitical or ethical reasons

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 We now turn to a number of questionsconcerning various political activitiesin which it is possible to participate.During the course of the past four years,

Page 15: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Variables Group(s)

- 15 -

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

have you: ... F. Boycotted products forpolitical or ethical reasons?

63 v063 Participated in discussionsabout social issues on theInternet

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 We now turn to a number of questionsconcerning various political activitiesin which it is possible to participate.During the course of the past fouryears, have you: ... G. Participated indiscussions about social issues on theInternet?

64 v064 Been in contact with apolitician to promote aparticular political issue

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 We now turn to a number of questionsconcerning various political activitiesin which it is possible to participate.During the course of the past four years,have you: ... H. Been in contact witha politician to promote a particularpolitical issue?

65 v065 Did any of this happenthrough internet, e-mail ortext-message

continuous numeric-1.0 285 1497 Did any of this happen through internet,e-mail or text-message?

66 v066 Dues-paying member of anypolitical party

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 We now turn to a number of questionsconcerning various political activitiesin which it is possible to participate.During the course of the past four years,have you: ... I. Are you at the presenta dues-paying member of any politicalparty?

67 v067 Taken batch tests before theelection

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 We now turn to a number of questionsconcerning various political activitiesin which it is possible to participate.During the course of the past four years,have you: ... J. Have you taken one ormore of the so-called batch tests on thenet before the election this year?

68 v068 Batch tests importance continuous numeric-1.0 683 1099 How important was this for your choiceof party? Was it of...

69 v069 Nationwide and regionalnewspapers

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 You can get information about theelection in several different ways.How important would you say thatthe following sources of informationwas for you in this election. Wherewould you place your opinion on ascale ranging from 1 to 5, where 1means "not important" and 5 means"very important". ... A. Nationwide andregional newspapers (also web editions)

70 v070 Local newspapers continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 You can get information about theelection in several different ways.How important would you say thatthe following sources of informationwas for you in this election. Wherewould you place your opinion on a scaleranging from 1 to 5, where 1 means"not important" and 5 means "veryimportant". ... B. Local newspapers (alsoweb editions)

71 v071 Spm21c Tv continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 You can get information about theelection in several different ways.How important would you say thatthe following sources of informationwas for you in this election. Wherewould you place your opinion on a scaleranging from 1 to 5, where 1 means

Page 16: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Variables Group(s)

- 16 -

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

"not important" and 5 means "veryimportant". ... C. TV

72 v072 Spm21d Radio continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 You can get information about theelection in several different ways.How important would you say thatthe following sources of informationwas for you in this election. Wherewould you place your opinion on a scaleranging from 1 to 5, where 1 means"not important" and 5 means "veryimportant". ... D. Radio

73 v073 Internet (without onlinenewspapers)

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 You can get information about theelection in several different ways.How important would you say thatthe following sources of informationwas for you in this election. Wherewould you place your opinion on ascale ranging from 1 to 5, where 1means "not important" and 5 means"very important". ... E. Internet (withoutonline newspapers)

74 v074 Parties' campaign materials continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 You can get information about theelection in several different ways.How important would you say thatthe following sources of informationwas for you in this election. Wherewould you place your opinion on a scaleranging from 1 to 5, where 1 means"not important" and 5 means "veryimportant". ... F. Parties' campaignmaterials (leaflets, pamphlets, etc.)

75 v075 Discussions with family andfriends

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 You can get information about theelection in several different ways.How important would you say thatthe following sources of informationwas for you in this election. Wherewould you place your opinion on a scaleranging from 1 to 5, where 1 means"not important" and 5 means "veryimportant". ... G. Discussions withfamily and friends

76 v076 Importance of print edition oronline edition

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Is it primarily the newspapers printedversion that is most important to you,are the print edition and online editionas important, or is it the newspaper'sonline edition that is most importantto you personally when it comes toinformation about the election?

77 v077 Trust in Local GovernmentCommittee

continuous numeric-2.0 1782 0 I would like to know how muchconfidence you have in certaininstitutions. After I have read the nameof an institution, could you place itin a rangig scale of 0 to 10, where 0means that you have no confidence atall and 10 means that you are extremelyconfident. ... A. Local GovernmentCommittee

78 v078 Trust in government continuous numeric-2.0 1782 0 I would like to know how muchconfidence you have in certaininstitutions. After I have read the nameof an institution, could you place itin a rangig scale of 0 to 10, where 0means that you have no confidence at

Page 17: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Variables Group(s)

- 17 -

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

all and 10 means that you are extremelyconfident. ... B. The government

79 v079 Trust in political parties continuous numeric-2.0 1782 0 I would like to know how muchconfidence you have in certaininstitutions. After I have read the nameof an institution, could you place itin a rangig scale of 0 to 10, where 0means that you have no confidence atall and 10 means that you are extremelyconfident. ... C. Political parties

80 v080 Trust in the Storting (nationalparliament)

continuous numeric-2.0 1782 0 I would like to know how muchconfidence you have in certaininstitutions. After I have read the nameof an institution, could you place itin a rangig scale of 0 to 10, where 0means that you have no confidence atall and 10 means that you are extremelyconfident. ... D. The Storting (nationalparliament)

81 v081 Trust in the courts continuous numeric-2.0 1782 0 I would like to know how muchconfidence you have in certaininstitutions. After I have read the nameof an institution, could you place itin a rangig scale of 0 to 10, where 0means that you have no confidence atall and 10 means that you are extremelyconfident. ... E. The courts

82 v082 Trust in politicians continuous numeric-2.0 1782 0 I would like to know how muchconfidence you have in certaininstitutions. After I have read the nameof an institution, could you place itin a rangig scale of 0 to 10, where 0means that you have no confidence atall and 10 means that you are extremelyconfident. ... F. Politicians

83 v083 Trust in media continuous numeric-2.0 1782 0 I would like to know how muchconfidence you have in certaininstitutions. After I have read the nameof an institution, could you place itin a rangig scale of 0 to 10, where 0means that you have no confidence atall and 10 means that you are extremelyconfident. ... G. The media

84 v084 Commitment to vote at theStorting (national parliament)election

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 What do you think about thecommitment to vote at the Storting(national parliament) election?Would you say is an extremelylarge commitment, a rather largecommitment, a small commitment or nocommitment at all?

85 v085 Most important challenge,Norway

discrete character-40 1774 0 Now we turn to a few questionsconcerning challenges Norway is facingtoday as a nation. What is in youropinion the most important challenge?And what is the second most important?... A. Answer 1

86 v086 Second most importantchallenge, Norway

discrete character-40 1587 0 Now we turn to a few questionsconcerning challenges Norway is facingtoday as a nation. What is in youropinion the most important challenge?And what is the second most important?... B. Answer 2

Page 18: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Variables Group(s)

- 18 -

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

87 v087 Party best - handling themost important challenge

continuous numeric-2.0 1400 382 If you think about the most importantchallenge: Which party do you thinkhandles it the best?

88 v088 Party best - handling thesecond most importantchallenge

continuous numeric-2.0 1309 473 If you think about the second mostimportant challenge: Which party doyou think handles it the best?

89 v089 Attitude towards abortion continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Now we turn to the abortion debate. Wehave summed up a few different pointsof view that are expressed in this debate.Which of these statements correspondsthe most with your own opinion?

90 v090 Accept bigger differences inwage levels

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 We have some more statements.We will continue to use the answeralternatives: strongly agree, agreesomewhat, disagree somewhat andstrongly disagree. Would you please tellme which of the answers you choosefor each statement I read you? ... A.To exhort people to greater effort,we should be willing to accept biggerdifferences in wage levels.

91 v091 First and foremost providejobs for Norwegians

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 We have some more statements.We will continue to use the answeralternatives: strongly agree, agreesomewhat, disagree somewhat andstrongly disagree. Would you please tellme which of the answers you choosefor each statement I read you? ... B.When times are bad, we should first andforemost provide jobs for Norwegians.

92 v092 Should allow commercialprivate schools

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 We have some more statements.We will continue to use the answeralternatives: strongly agree, agreesomewhat, disagree somewhat andstrongly disagree. Would you please tellme which of the answers you choosefor each statement I read you? ... C.We should allow commercial privateschools.

93 v093 Rather develop publicservices than to reducetaxation

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 We have some more statements.We will continue to use the answeralternatives: strongly agree, agreesomewhat, disagree somewhat andstrongly disagree. Would you please tellme which of the answers you choosefor each statement I read you? ... D. Itis more important to develop publicservices than to reduce taxation.

94 v094 Build gasworks even thoughCO2 cleaning won't bepossible

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 We have some more statements.We will continue to use the answeralternatives: strongly agree, agreesomewhat, disagree somewhat andstrongly disagree. Would you please tellme which of the answers you choosefor each statement I read you? ... E. Weshould build gasworks even though CO2cleaning won't be possible with today'stechnology.

95 v095 Immigrants should have thesame rights to social benefits

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 We have some more statements.We will continue to use the answeralternatives: strongly agree, agreesomewhat, disagree somewhat and

Page 19: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Variables Group(s)

- 19 -

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

strongly disagree. Would you please tellme which of the answers you choosefor each statement I read you? ... F.Refugees and immigrants should havethe same rights to social benefits fromthe state as Norwegians even thoughthey are not Norwegian citizens.

96 v096 Politicians don't understandthe country side in Norway.

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 We have some more statements.We will continue to use the answeralternatives: strongly agree, agreesomewhat, disagree somewhat andstrongly disagree. Would you please tellme which of the answers you choosefor each statement I read you? ... G.Politicians and bureaucrats in Oslo don'tunderstand what's really going on in thecountry side in Norway.

97 v097 It is important that we signinternational agreements

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 We have some more statements.We will continue to use the answeralternatives: strongly agree, agreesomewhat, disagree somewhat andstrongly disagree. Would you please tellme which of the answers you choosefor each statement I read you? ... H. Itis important that we sign internationalagreements even if that limits norwegianauthorities' freedom of action

98 v098 Importance of who's inpower

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Some people say it makes a bigdifference who is in power. Otherssay that it doesn't make any differencewho is in power. Using a scale rangingfrom 1 to 5, where one means that itmakes a big difference who is in powerand 5 means that it doesn't make anydifference who is in power. Wherewould you place yourself?

99 v099 Importance of who peoplevote for

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Some people say that no matter whopeople vote for, it won't make anydifference to what happens. Others saythat who people vote for can make abig difference to what happens. Usinga scale ranging from 1 to 5, where1 means that voting won't make anydifference to what happens and 5 meansthat voting can make a big difference,where would you place yourself?

100 v100 Any party that represents R'sviews

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Would you say that any of the partiesin Norway represents your viewsreasonably well?

101 v101 Which party R's views best continuous numeric-2.0 1470 312 Which party represents your views best?

102 v102 Specified discrete character-30 5 0 Specify which other party you have inmind.

103 v103 Any party leader thatrepresents R's view

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Regardless of how you feel aboutthe parties, would you say any of theindividual party leaders represents yourviews reasonably well?

104 v104 The party leader thatrepresents R's views best

continuous numeric-2.0 1307 475 Which party leader represents yourviews best?

105 v105 Specify discrete character-30 9 0 Specify which other party leader youhave in mind.

Page 20: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Variables Group(s)

- 20 -

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

106 v106 How good or bad a job hasthe government done

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 The last four years we have had agovernment consisting og the LabourParty, the Socialist Left Party and theCenter Party. How good or bad a job doyou think it has done? Has it done a…

107 v107 Appreciation of ChristianDemocratic Party

continuous numeric-2.0 1743 39 I would now like to know what youthink of each of the political parties.After I have read the name of a politicalparty would you please rate it on a scaleranging from 0 to 10, where 0 meansthat you strongly dislike that party and10 means that you strongly like thatparty. ... A. Where would you placeChristian people's party (Krf) on thisscale?

108 v108 Appreciation of the LiberalParty

continuous numeric-2.0 1726 56 I would now like to know what youthink of each of the political parties.After I have read the name of a politicalparty would you please rate it on a scaleranging from 0 to 10, where 0 meansthat you strongly dislike that party and10 means that you strongly like thatparty. ... B. Where would you placeLiberal party (V) on this scale?

109 v109 Appreciation of the CenterParty

continuous numeric-2.0 1732 50 I would now like to know what youthink of each of the political parties.After I have read the name of a politicalparty would you please rate it on a scaleranging from 0 to 10, where 0 meansthat you strongly dislike that party and10 means that you strongly like thatparty. ... C. Where would you placeCenter party (SP) on this scale?

110 v110 Appreciation of the SocialistLeft Party

continuous numeric-2.0 1736 46 I would now like to know what youthink of each of the political parties.After I have read the name of a politicalparty would you please rate it on a scaleranging from 0 to 10, where 0 meansthat you strongly dislike that party and10 means that you strongly like thatparty. ... D. Where would you placeSocial left party (SV) on this scale?

111 v111 Appreciation of theConservative Party

continuous numeric-2.0 1740 42 I would now like to know what youthink of each of the political parties.After I have read the name of a politicalparty would you please rate it on a scaleranging from 0 to 10, where 0 meansthat you strongly dislike that party and10 means that you strongly like thatparty. ... E. Where would you placeConservative party (H) on this scale?

112 v112 Appreciation of the LabourParty

continuous numeric-2.0 1748 34 I would now like to know what youthink of each of the political parties.After I have read the name of a politicalparty would you please rate it on a scaleranging from 0 to 10, where 0 meansthat you strongly dislike that party and10 means that you strongly like thatparty. ... F. Where would you placeLabour party (DNA) on this scale?

113 v113 Appreciation of the ProgressParty

continuous numeric-2.0 1747 35 I would now like to know what youthink of each of the political parties.

Page 21: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Variables Group(s)

- 21 -

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

After I have read the name of a politicalparty would you please rate it on a scaleranging from 0 to 10, where 0 meansthat you strongly dislike that party and10 means that you strongly like thatparty. ... G. Where would you placeProgress party (FRP) on this scale?

114 v114 Appreciation of the RedElectoral Alliance

continuous numeric-2.0 1688 94 I would now like to know what youthink of each of the political parties.After I have read the name of a politicalparty would you please rate it on a scaleranging from 0 to 10, where 0 meansthat you strongly dislike that party and10 means that you strongly like thatparty. ... H. Where would you place Redelectoral alliance (RV) on this scale?

115 v115 Like/dislike: DagfinnHøybråten

continuous numeric-2.0 1727 55 After I have read you the name of apolitical leader, would you please ratehim or her on a scale ranging from 0to 10, where 0 means that you stronglydislike that politician, and 10 meansthat you like the politician very much.... A. Where would you place DagfinnHøybråten on this scale?

116 v116 Like/dislike: Lars Sponheim continuous numeric-2.0 1731 51 After I have read you the name of apolitical leader, would you please ratehim or her on a scale ranging from 0to 10, where 0 means that you stronglydislike that politician, and 10 means thatyou like the politician very much. ... B.Where would you place Lars Sponheimon this scale?

117 v117 Like/dislike: Liv SigneNavarsete

continuous numeric-2.0 1683 99 After I have read you the name of apolitical leader, would you please ratehim or her on a scale ranging from 0to 10, where 0 means that you stronglydislike that politician, and 10 meansthat you like the politician very much.... C. Where would you place Liv SigneNavarsete on this scale?

118 v118 Like/dislike: KristinHalvorsen

continuous numeric-2.0 1746 36 After I have read you the name of apolitical leader, would you please ratehim or her on a scale ranging from 0to 10, where 0 means that you stronglydislike that politician, and 10 meansthat you like the politician very much.... D. Where would you place KristinHalvorsen on this scale?

119 v119 Like/dislike: Erna Solberg continuous numeric-2.0 1748 34 After I have read you the name of apolitical leader, would you please ratehim or her on a scale ranging from 0to 10, where 0 means that you stronglydislike that politician, and 10 means thatyou like the politician very much. ... E.Where would you place Erna Solberg onthis scale?

120 v120 Like/dislike: Siv Jensen continuous numeric-2.0 1751 31 After I have read you the name of apolitical leader, would you please ratehim or her on a scale ranging from 0to 10, where 0 means that you stronglydislike that politician, and 10 means thatyou like the politician very much. ... F.

Page 22: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Variables Group(s)

- 22 -

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

Where would you place Siv Jensen onthis scale?

121 v121 Like/dislike: Torstein Dahle continuous numeric-2.0 1399 383 After I have read you the name of apolitical leader, would you please ratehim or her on a scale ranging from 0to 10, where 0 means that you stronglydislike that politician, and 10 means thatyou like the politician very much. ... G.Where would you place Torstein Dahleon this scale?

122 v122 Like/dislike: Jens Stoltenberg continuous numeric-2.0 1754 28 After I have read you the name of apolitical leader, would you please ratehim or her on a scale ranging from 0to 10, where 0 means that you stronglydislike that politician, and 10 means thatyou like the politician very much. ... H.Where would you place Jens Stoltenbergon this scale?

123 v123 Center party (SP) continuous numeric-2.0 1782 0 In politics people sometimes talk of leftand right. Where would you place thedifferent parties on a scale ranging from0 to 10 where 0 is the left side and 10 isthe right side? ... A. Center party (SP)

124 v124 Progress party (FRP) continuous numeric-2.0 1782 0 In politics people sometimes talk of leftand right. Where would you place thedifferent parties on a scale ranging from0 to 10 where 0 is the left side and 10is the right side? ... B. Progress party(FRP)

125 v125 Liberal party (V) continuous numeric-2.0 1782 0 In politics people sometimes talk of leftand right. Where would you place thedifferent parties on a scale ranging from0 to 10 where 0 is the left side and 10 isthe right side? ... C. Liberal party (V)

126 v126 Labour party (DNA) continuous numeric-2.0 1782 0 In politics people sometimes talk ofleft and right. Where would you placethe different parties on a scale rangingfrom 0 to 10 where 0 is the left side and10 is the right side? ... D. Labour party(DNA)

127 v127 Conservative party (H) continuous numeric-2.0 1782 0 In politics people sometimes talk of leftand right. Where would you place thedifferent parties on a scale ranging from0 to 10 where 0 is the left side and 10 isthe right side? ... E. Conservative party(H)

128 v128 Christian people's party(KRF)

continuous numeric-2.0 1782 0 In politics people sometimes talk of leftand right. Where would you place thedifferent parties on a scale ranging from0 to 10 where 0 is the left side and 10 isthe right side? ... F. Christian people'sparty (KRF)

129 v129 Social left party (SV) continuous numeric-2.0 1782 0 In politics people sometimes talk of leftand right. Where would you place thedifferent parties on a scale ranging from0 to 10 where 0 is the left side and 10is the right side? ... G. Social left party(SV)

130 v130 Red/Red electoral alliance(RV)

continuous numeric-2.0 1782 0 In politics people sometimes talk of leftand right. Where would you place thedifferent parties on a scale ranging from

Page 23: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Variables Group(s)

- 23 -

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

0 to 10 where 0 is the left side and 10 isthe right side? ... H. Red/Red electoralalliance (RV)

131 v131 Self-placement on left-rightscale

continuous numeric-2.0 1782 0 Where would you place yourself on ascale from 0 to 10 where 0 means theleft and 10 means right?

132 v132 The campaign helped toclarify the differencesbetween the parties

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 When you look back on the electioncampaign. To what extent do you thinkthis campaign helped to clarify thedifferences between the parties? Wouldyou say..

133 v133 Follow the media during theelection campaign

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 How well did you follow the mediaduring the election campaign? Verywell, fairly well, not well, or didn't youfollow it at all?

134 v134 Satisfied with the waydemocracy works in Norway

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 All things considered, are you verysatisfied, quite satisfied, not quitesatisfied or not satisfied at all with theway democracy works in Norway?

135 v135 Party affiliation continuous numeric-2.0 930 852 Many people think of themselves asadherents of a particular party, whileothers feel no affiliation with any party.Would you say that you in generalthink of yourself as a Conservative, aLaborite a SV supporter etc., or don'tyou consider yourself affiliated with anyparticular party?

136 v136 Strongly convinced supporter continuous numeric-1.0 930 852 Do you consider yourself to be astrongly convinced supporter, or are younot a particularly convinced supporter ofthis party?

137 v137 Read on internet inconnection with the election

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 How often did you read about theelection on the Internet in connectionwith the election campaign?

138 v138 Use of parties' home pages continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Regarding the election this year, did youacquire information from the parties'homepages on the internet?

139 v139 Red/Red Electoral Alliance continuous numeric-1.0 327 1455 Which party or parties' websites did youretrieve information from? ... A. RedElectoral Alliance

140 v140 Got info: SV continuous numeric-1.0 327 1455 Which party or parties' websites did youretrieve information from? ... B. SocialLeft Party

141 v141 Got info: DNA continuous numeric-1.0 327 1455 Which party or parties' websites did youretrieve information from? ... C. TheLabour Party

142 v142 Got info: V continuous numeric-1.0 327 1455 Which party or parties' websites did youretrieve information from? ... D. TheLiberal Party

143 v143 Got info: Krf continuous numeric-1.0 327 1455 Which party or parties' websites did youretrieve information from? ... E. TheChristian People's Party

144 v144 Got info: SP continuous numeric-1.0 327 1455 Which party or parties' websites did youretrieve information from? ... F. TheCenter Party

Page 24: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Variables Group(s)

- 24 -

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

145 v145 Got info: H continuous numeric-1.0 327 1455 Which party or parties' websites did youretrieve information from? ... G. TheConservative Party

146 v146 Got info: Frp continuous numeric-1.0 327 1455 Which party or parties' websites did youretrieve information from? ... H. TheProgress Party

147 v147 Got info: Other parties continuous numeric-1.0 327 1455 Which party or parties' websites did youretrieve information from? ... I. Otherparties

148 v148 Visited politicians' websites continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Have you in connection with theelection this year, visited somepoliticians' websites, such as facebookor twitter?

149 v149 Web pages of party leadersor other politicians

continuous numeric-1.0 139 1643 Was this mainly web pages of partyleaders, or was it mainly otherpoliticians?

150 v150 Political advertising allowed continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 There has been some discussion aboutwether political advertising on televisionshould be allowed or not. What is youropinion on this question?

151 v151 Specify other politicaladvertising

discrete character-60 36 0 Specify other political advertising

152 v152 Government was importantfor voting

continuous numeric-1.0 1765 17 Before the election, there werediscussions about which governmentthe country would get. How importantwas this topic for your vote? Would yousay...

153 v153 Preferred government option continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Before the election this year, it has beendiscussed several different governmentoptions. Which of the following optionsdo you prefer yourself?

154 v154 Specify other governmentoptions

discrete character-100 119 0 Specify other government options.

155 v155 Parties R. doesn't want to bepart of the Government

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Is there any party or parties youdefinitely don't want to take office andbe part of the Government?

156 v156 Should not form agovernment: Red ElectoralAlliance

continuous numeric-1.0 1471 311 Which party or parties is that? ... A. RedElectoral Alliance

157 v157 Should not form agovernment: SV

continuous numeric-1.0 1471 311 Which party or parties is that? ... B.Social Left Party (SV)

158 v158 Should not form agovernment: DNA

continuous numeric-1.0 1471 311 Which party or parties is that? ... C.Labour Party (DNA)

159 v159 Should not form agovernment: V

continuous numeric-1.0 1471 311 Which party or parties is that? ... D.Liberal Party (V)

160 v160 Should not form agovernment: Krf

continuous numeric-1.0 1471 311 Which party or parties is that? ... E.Christian People's Party (KrF)

161 v161 Should not form agovernment: SP

continuous numeric-1.0 1471 311 Which party or parties is that? ... F.Center Party (SP)

162 v162 Should not form agovernment: H

continuous numeric-1.0 1471 311 Which party or parties is that? ... G.Conservative Party (H)

163 v163 Should not form agovernment: Frp

continuous numeric-1.0 1471 311 Which party or parties is that? ... H.Progress Party (FrP)

Page 25: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Variables Group(s)

- 25 -

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

164 v164 Should not form agovernment: Other parties

continuous numeric-1.0 1471 311 Which party or parties is that? ... I.Other parties

165 v165 Areas where the red - greengovernment has done a goodjob

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Is there a special area where you thinkthe red - green government has done agood job?

166 v166 Area 1 governm. did a goodjob

discrete character-200 1030 0 Is there a special area where you thinkthe red - green government has done agood job? ... A. Area 1

167 v167 Area 2 governm. did a goodjob

discrete character-200 546 0 Is there a special area where you thinkthe red - green government has done agood job? ... B. Area 2

168 v168 Area 3 governm. did a goodjob

discrete character-200 221 0 Is there a special area where you thinkthe red - green government has done agood job? ... C. Area 3

169 v169 Areas where the red - greengovernment has done a poorjob

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Is there a special area where you thinkthe red - green government has done apoor job?

170 v170 Area 1 governm. did a poorjob

discrete character-200 1099 0 Is there a special area where you thinkthe red - green government has done apoor job? ... A. Area 1

171 v171 Area 2 governm. did a poorjob

discrete character-200 658 0 Is there a special area where you thinkthe red - green government has done apoor job? ... B. Area 2

172 v172 Area 3 governm. did a poorjob

discrete character-200 306 0 Is there a special area where you thinkthe red - green government has done apoor job? ... C. Area 3

173 v173 Unemployed last four years continuous numeric-1.0 1675 107 Have you yourself or other membersof your household been unemployedduring the past for years?

174 v174 Fear of unemployment continuous numeric-1.0 1674 108 Have you yourself or other membersof your household been unemployedor experienced particular difficulty ingetting a job during the past for years?

175 v175 The red - green governmenthas handled the crisis

continuous numeric-1.0 1731 51 As known, Norway too was hit by theglobal financial crisis the past year. Howdo you think the red - green governmenthas handled this crisis? Do you meanthat it has handled it very well, fairlywell, fairly bad or very bad?

176 v176 Respresentatives' knowledgeof people's views

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Some people say that the members ofthe Storting know what ordinary peoplethink. Others say that the members ofthe Storting don't know much aboutwhat ordinary people think. Using thescale on this card, (where one meansthat the members of the Storting knowwhat ordinary people think, and fivemeans that the members of the Stortingdon't know much about what ordinarypeople think), where would you placeyourself?

177 v177 Differences between theparties at Stortinget

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 How much do you generally think thatthe parties in Stortinget differ fromone another. Would you say that thedifferences are large, quite large, notparticularly large or is there not muchdifference at all?

Page 26: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Variables Group(s)

- 26 -

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

178 v178 Waste of tax payers' money continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Do you think that those who governwaste a large part of the money we payin taxes, that they waste some of it, orthat they actually waste very little of thismoney?

179 v179 Competence of politicians continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Do you feel that most Norwegianpoliticians are competent people, whogenerally know what they are doing, ordo you believe that many of them lackknowledge of the issues they are set towork with?

180 v180 Trustworthy politicians continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Do you find most of our politicians tobe trustworthy, that they are trustworthyon the whole, or that few Norwegianpoliticians are trustworthy?

181 v181 Reduce state control overprivate industry

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 I will once more read you somestatements about political questions.Could you for each statement say ifyou strongly agree, agree somewhat,disagree somewhat or if you stronglydisagree? ... A. We should reduce statecontrol over private industry.

182 v182 Secure economic growth -develop our industry

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 I will once more read you somestatements about political questions.Could you for each statement say ifyou strongly agree, agree somewhat,disagree somewhat or if you stronglydisagree? ... B. To secure economicgrowth we need to develop our industryeven if it conflicts with environmentalconsiderations.

183 v183 Public activities could havebeen done better, if left toprivate.

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 I will once more read you somestatements about political questions.Could you for each statement say ifyou strongly agree, agree somewhat,disagree somewhat or if you stronglydisagree? ... C. Many public activitiescould have been done better andcheaper, if they were handed over toprivate operators.

184 v184 High incomes should be putunder harder taxation

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 I will once more read you somestatements about political questions.Could you for each statement say ifyou strongly agree, agree somewhat,disagree somewhat or if you stronglydisagree? ... D. High incomes should beput under harder taxation than they aretoday.

185 v185 International orientation isimportant

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 I will once more read you somestatements about political questions.Could you for each statement say ifyou strongly agree, agree somewhat,disagree somewhat or if you stronglydisagree? ... E. We should go for asociety that has a more internationalorientation, with less emphasis onboundaries between peoples andcountries.

186 v186 Christian values are moreprominent

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 I will once more read you somestatements about political questions.Could you for each statement say ifyou strongly agree, agree somewhat,

Page 27: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Variables Group(s)

- 27 -

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

disagree somewhat or if you stronglydisagree? ... F. We should promote asociety where Christian values are moreprominent.

187 v187 Globalisation is absolutelynecessary to secure economicgrowth

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 I will once more read you somestatements about political questions.Could you for each statement say ifyou strongly agree, agree somewhat,disagree somewhat or if you stronglydisagree? ... G. Globalisation isabsolutely necessary to secure economicgrowth.

188 v188 New technology will solvethe problem of climatechange

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 I will once more read you somestatements about political questions.Could you for each statement say ifyou strongly agree, agree somewhat,disagree somewhat or if you stronglydisagree? ... H. New technology willsolve the problem of climate changewithout us reducing our standard ofliving.

189 v189 Significance of mediacoverage

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 If we look back on the coverage ofthe election campaign on television,radio and in the newspapers as a whole,what impact has it had on your votingdecision/your decision not to vote.Would you say..

190 v190 Household economy better orworse

continuous numeric-1.0 1764 18 We are interested in people's currenteconomic status. Would you say thatyou and your household's economy isbetter or worse than it was a year ago?

191 v191 Household economy: muchbetter or a bit better

continuous numeric-1.0 590 1192 Is it much better or a bit better?

192 v192 Household economy: muchworse or a bit worse

continuous numeric-1.0 198 1584 Is it much worse or a bit worse?

193 v193 Future personal economicsituation

continuous numeric-1.0 1759 23 Let's think ahead towards the years tocome. Do you think your economicsituation would be like today, better thantoday or do you think it would be worsethan today?

194 v194 The economic situation inNorway today

continuous numeric-1.0 1760 22 What do you think about the economicsituation in Norway today? Would yousay the economy is very good, good,neither good nor bad, bad or very bad?

195 v195 Economic situation last year continuous numeric-1.0 1744 38 Would you say that the economicsituation in the country has improvedthe last 12 months, is it almostunchanged or is it worse today?

196 v196 Ec. situation: much better ora bit better

continuous numeric-1.0 323 1459 Would you say much better or a bitbetter?

197 v197 Ec. situation: much worse ora bit worse

continuous numeric-1.0 362 1420 Would you say much worse or a bitworse?

198 v198 Social security schemes continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Let's look at the scope of all ourbenefits. Some believe that we havegradually received more than enoughof benefits, and that we should seek tolimit them in the future, while othersargue that we should maintain our socialsecurity schemes, and if necessarydevelop them further. What is your

Page 28: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Variables Group(s)

- 28 -

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

opinion? Do you think that in the futurethere should be less benefits, that theyshould be maintained as they are now,or that they should be increased?

199 v199 Spending oil income continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Let us imagine two persons A and Bdiscussing a question of current interest.We have listed two statements thetwo persons put forward. A says: Toavoid an increase in interest, and higherprices, we should not use more of the oilincome than we do at present. B says:To solve current problems in society wemay use considerably more of the oilincome than we do at present. Whichone of these persons would you agreemore with?

200 v200 Choice of freedom forcitizens

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 There is also a discussion about greaterchoice of freedom for citizens, forexample between public or privateproviders of service tasks, or betweendifferent public institutions. A says:There should be introduced, to a greaterextent than now, more freedom ofchoice in the public sector. B says: Thechice of freedom for citizens today isadequate. Which one of these personswould you agree more with?

201 v201 Society's social reforms continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Now a question about society's socialspending. A says: We have gone toofar with social reforms in this country.People should to a greater degree thannow manage without social benefits andcontributions from the community. Bsays: The social reforms that have beenimplemented should be maintained forat least the same extent as now. Whichone of these persons would you agreemore with?

202 v202 Misuse of our welfarebenefits

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Do you think that our welfare benefitsare misused greatly, in some degree or asmall degree?

203 v203 Can vote, but can't doanything else to influencepolitics

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Now let's take a look at somestatements. We will continue to usethe answer alternatives: strongly agree,agree somewhat, disagree somewhat andstrongly disagree. ... A. People like mecan vote, but we can't do anything elseto influence politics.

204 v204 Climate change is mainlymanmade.

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Now let's take a look at somestatements. We will continue to usethe answer alternatives: strongly agree,agree somewhat, disagree somewhat andstrongly disagree. ... B. Climate changeis mainly manmade.

205 v205 Equal adoption rightsfor homosexuals andheterosexuals

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Now let's take a look at somestatements. We will continue to usethe answer alternatives: strongly agree,agree somewhat, disagree somewhat andstrongly disagree. ... C. There should beequal adoption rights for homosexualsand heterosexuals.

Page 29: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Variables Group(s)

- 29 -

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

206 v206 Not possible to maintain thewelfare state

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Now let's take a look at somestatements. We will continue to usethe answer alternatives: strongly agree,agree somewhat, disagree somewhat andstrongly disagree. ... D. In the longerterm it is not possible to maintain thewelfare state at the present level.

207 v207 Not Norwgian citizens-expelled if commit criminalact

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Now let's take a look at somestatements. We will continue to usethe answer alternatives: strongly agree,agree somewhat, disagree somewhat andstrongly disagree. ... E. If immigrantswithout Norwegian citizenship commit acriminal act, they should be sent out.

208 v208 Should build morewaterways.

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Now let's take a look at somestatements. We will continue to usethe answer alternatives: strongly agree,agree somewhat, disagree somewhat andstrongly disagree. ... F. We should buildmore waterways.

209 v209 More state institutions shouldbe moved

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Now let's take a look at somestatements. We will continue to usethe answer alternatives: strongly agree,agree somewhat, disagree somewhatand strongly disagree. ... G. More stateinstitutions should be moved to districtareas.

210 v210 Should allow euthanasia. continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Now let's take a look at somestatements. We will continue to usethe answer alternatives: strongly agree,agree somewhat, disagree somewhat andstrongly disagree. ... H. We should alloweuthanasia.

211 v211 Wealth tax should beabolished.

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Now let's take a look at somestatements. We will continue to usethe answer alternatives: strongly agree,agree somewhat, disagree somewhatand strongly disagree. ... I. Wealth taxshould be abolished.

212 v212 Vote in the election continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Did you vote in the election this fall?

213 v213 If had voted: Red/RedElectoral Alliance

continuous numeric-1.0 194 1588 Let us imagine that you had voted,which party or parties would you votefor? ... A. Red/Red Electoral Alliance

214 v214 If had voted: SV continuous numeric-1.0 194 1588 Let us imagine that you had voted,which party or parties would you votefor? ... B. Social Left Party (SV)

215 v215 If had voted: DNA continuous numeric-1.0 194 1588 Let us imagine that you had voted,which party or parties would you votefor? ... C. Labour Party (DNA)

216 v216 If had voted: V continuous numeric-1.0 194 1588 Let us imagine that you had voted,which party or parties would you votefor? ... D. Liberal Party (V)

217 v217 If had voted: Krf continuous numeric-1.0 194 1588 Let us imagine that you had voted,which party or parties would you votefor? ... E. Christian People's Party (KrF)

218 v218 If had voted: SP continuous numeric-1.0 194 1588 Let us imagine that you had voted,which party or parties would you votefor? ... F. Center Party (Sp)

Page 30: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Variables Group(s)

- 30 -

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

219 v219 If had voted: H continuous numeric-1.0 194 1588 Let us imagine that you had voted,which party or parties would you votefor? ... G. Conservative Party (H)

220 v220 If had voted: Frp continuous numeric-1.0 194 1588 Let us imagine that you had voted,which party or parties would you votefor? ... H. Progress Party (FrP)

221 v221 If had voted: Andre partier continuous numeric-1.0 194 1588 Let us imagine that you had voted,which party or parties would you votefor? ... I. Other parties/lists

222 v222 If had voted: Stemme blankt continuous numeric-1.0 194 1588 Let us imagine that you had voted,which party or parties would you votefor? ... J. Blank vote

223 v223 Specify other parties/lists discrete character-30 0 0 La oss tenke oss at du likevel haddestemt, hvilket parti eller partier ville duda ha stemt på? ... I. Other parties/lists ...A. Specify

224 v224 Which party or list did youvote for

continuous numeric-2.0 1578 204 Which party or list did you vote for?

225 v225 Specify other parties/lists discrete character-30 7 0 Specify other parties/lists

226 v226 Other parties also consideredvoting for

continuous numeric-1.0 1557 225 Was there any other parties you alsoconsidered voting for?

227 v227 Considered voting for:Red/Red Electoral Alliance

continuous numeric-1.0 958 824 Which party or parties is this? ... A.Red/Red Electoral Alliance

228 v228 Considered voting for: SV continuous numeric-1.0 958 824 Which party or parties is this? ... B.Social Left Party (SV)

229 v229 Considered voting for: DNA continuous numeric-1.0 958 824 Which party or parties is this? ... C.Labour Party (DNA)

230 v230 Considered voting for: V continuous numeric-1.0 958 824 Which party or parties is this? ... D.Liberal Party (V)

231 v231 Considered voting for: Krf continuous numeric-1.0 958 824 Which party or parties is this? ... E.Christian People's Party (KrF)

232 v232 Considered voting for: SP continuous numeric-1.0 958 824 Which party or parties is this? ... F.Center Party (Sp)

233 v233 Considered voting for: H continuous numeric-1.0 958 824 Which party or parties is this? ... G.Conservative Party (H)

234 v234 Considered voting for: Frp continuous numeric-1.0 958 824 Which party or parties is this? ... H.Progress Party (FrP)

235 v235 Considered voting for: Otherparties/lists

continuous numeric-1.0 958 824 Which party or parties is this? ... I.Other parties/lists

236 v236 Specify other parties -considered voting

discrete character-30 9 0 Which party or parties is this? ... I.Other parties/lists ... A. Specify

237 v237 Parties never would havevoted for

continuous numeric-1.0 1557 225 Are there any parties you would neverhave voted for?

238 v238 Parties never would havevoted for: Red/Red ElectoralAlliance

continuous numeric-1.0 1459 323 Which party or parties is this? ... A.Red/Red Electoral Alliance

239 v239 Parties never would havevoted for: SV

continuous numeric-1.0 1459 323 Which party or parties is this? ... B.Social Left Party (SV)

240 v240 Parties never would havevoted for: DNA

continuous numeric-1.0 1459 323 Which party or parties is this? ... C.Labour Party (DNA)

241 v241 Parties never would havevoted for: V

continuous numeric-1.0 1459 323 Which party or parties is this? ... D.Liberal Party (V)

Page 31: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Variables Group(s)

- 31 -

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

242 v242 Parties never would havevoted for: Krf

continuous numeric-1.0 1459 323 Which party or parties is this? ... E.Christian People's Party (KrF)

243 v243 Parties never would havevoted for: SP

continuous numeric-1.0 1459 323 Which party or parties is this? ... F.Center Party (Sp)

244 v244 Parties never would havevoted for: H

continuous numeric-1.0 1459 323 Which party or parties is this? ... G.Conservative Party (H)

245 v245 Parties never would havevoted for: Frp

continuous numeric-1.0 1459 323 Which party or parties is this? ... H.Progress Party (FrP)

246 v246 Parties never would havevoted for: Andre partier

continuous numeric-1.0 1459 323 Which party or parties is this? ... I.Other parties/lists

247 v247 Specify other parties - notconsidered voting

discrete numeric-30.0 1 1781 Hvilket parti eller hvilke partier vardette? ... I. Other parties/lists ... A.Specify

248 v248 Difficulties with votedecision

continuous numeric-1.0 1557 225 Some people say that it was very easyto make up their minds in this election,while others found it very difficult. Howdid you find it, was it …

249 v249 Decided - election campaign continuous numeric-1.0 1557 225 When you decided upon the party youvoted for - was it a long time beforethe election campaign started, was it atsome point during the election campaignor was it right before polling day?

250 v250 Vote in advance continuous numeric-1.0 1392 390 Did you make use of the arrangementthat allows you to cast your vote inadvance, or did you cast your vote at aregular polling station?

251 v251 Voted previous Stortingelection

continuous numeric-2.0 1782 0 If we turn to the previous Stortingelection. Who did you vote for in theStorting election in 2005?

252 v252 Specify other party voted forthe previous Storting election

discrete character-30 4 0 Specify other party voted for theprevious Storting election

253 v253 Current marital status continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 What is your current marital status? Areyou..

254 v254 Children below the age of 16living with you

continuous numeric-2.0 1782 0 Have you got any children below theage of 16 living with you, if so, howmany?

255 v255 R. in currently paidemployment

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Are you currently in paid employment?

256 v256 R's normal weekly workinghours

continuous numeric-3.0 1271 511 How many hours a week do you usuallywork in your job?

257 v257 Do you consider yourselfas...?

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Do you consider yourself as...?

258 v258 What is your primary sourceof income?

discrete numeric-40.0 0 1782 What is your primary source of income?

259 v259 R. supervise the work ofothers

continuous numeric-1.0 1177 605 Do you have any tasks which involvedsupervising the work of others?

260 v260 R's primaryoccupation/profession - code

discrete numeric-4.0 1177 605 What is your primaryoccupation/profession?

261 v261 A superior position continuous numeric-1.0 1177 605 Would you say that this is/was asuperior position?

262 v262 Job description continuous numeric-1.0 1177 605 Did you work in your primaryoccupation as an employee, as anindependent with hired help, as an

Page 32: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Variables Group(s)

- 32 -

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

independent without hired help, or as afamily member with no regular, fixedincome?

263 v263 Employer description continuous numeric-1.0 1064 718 Was this business/industry a privatelyowned firm, a joint-stock company, anorganisation, in municipal, county orpublic service?

264 v264 In paid employment untilthe time began to receive apension/welfare benefit

continuous numeric-1.0 360 1422 Were you in paid employment untilthe time you began to receive apension/welfare benefit?

265 v265 Paid employment previously continuous numeric-1.0 56 1726 Were you in a paid employmentpreviously?

266 v266 Did R. supervise the work ofothers

continuous numeric-1.0 360 1422 Did you have any tasks which involvedsupervising the work of others?

267 v267 R's last primaryoccupation/profession

discrete numeric-4.0 360 1422 What was your last primaryoccupation/profession?

268 v268 R's previous normal workinghours

continuous numeric-3.0 360 1422 How many hours a week did you usuallywork in that job?

269 v269 Former job description continuous numeric-1.0 360 1422 Did you work in your primaryoccupation as an employee, as anindependent with hired help, as anindependent without hired help, or as afamily member with no regular, fixedincome?

270 v270 Superior position? continuous numeric-1.0 315 1467 Would you say that this is/was asuperior position?

271 v271 Former employer description continuous numeric-1.0 315 1467 Was this business/industry a privatelyowned firm, a joint-stock company, anorganisation, in municipal, county orpublic service?

272 v272 Spouse/partner currently inpaid employment

continuous numeric-1.0 1209 573 Is your spouse/partner currently in paidemployment?

273 v273 Spouse/partner's mostimportant activity or sourceof income

continuous numeric-1.0 332 1450 What is your spouse/partner's mostimportant activity or source of income?

274 v274 spouse/partner in paidemployment until the timehe/she began to receive apension/welfare benefit?

continuous numeric-1.0 260 1522 Was your spouse/partner in paidemployment until the time he/she beganto receive a pension/welfare benefit?

275 v275 R's spouse supervised thework of others

continuous numeric-1.0 1094 688 Did/does he/she have any tasks whichinvolved supervising the work of others?

276 v276 R's spouse/partner'slast primaryoccupation/profession

discrete numeric-4.0 1094 688 What was your spouse/partner's lastprimary occupation/profession?

277 v277 R's spouse/partner's -superior position

continuous numeric-1.0 1094 688 Would you say your spouse/partner'sprofession/occupation is/was a superiorposition?

278 v278 R's spouse/partner's kind ofbusiness

continuous numeric-1.0 1094 688 Was this business/industry a privatelyowned firm, a joint-stock company, anorganisation, in municipal, county orpublic service?

279 v279 R. member of a union continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Are you a member of a union or a workorganisation?

280 v280 Primary union thisorganisation belongs to

continuous numeric-2.0 877 905 Which primary union does thisorganisation belong to?

Page 33: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Variables Group(s)

- 33 -

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

281 v281 Bak19sps Spes avhovedsammenslutn for org.

discrete numeric-40.0 0 1782 Specify which other primary union thisorganisations belongs to.

282 v282 Active member of theorganisation

continuous numeric-1.0 877 905 Are you an active member of thisorganisation? By active member, I meanthat one participates in most of themeetings.

283 v283 R's written form continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Which form of the Norwegian languagedo you prefer to use in your writing:"Bokmål" or "Nynorsk"?

284 v284 Interested in the languageissue

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 How interested are you in the languageissue? Would you say you are...

285 v285 R abstainer continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Do you consider yourself a totalabstainer, or do you drink alcohol nowand then?

286 v286 Interest in the abstinenceissue

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 How interested are you in the abstinenceissue? Would you say that you are...

287 v287 R member of any religiousorganisation

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Are you a member of any religious orChristian association or organisation?

288 v288 Present at chuch services continuous numeric-2.0 1782 0 How many times during the past monthhave you ... A. Been present at chuchservices?

289 v289 Attended other religiousmeetings

continuous numeric-2.0 1782 0 How many times during the past monthhave you ... B. Attended other religiousmeetings?

290 v290 Listened to devotionals andchurch services on the radioor television

continuous numeric-2.0 1782 0 How many times during the past monthhave you ... C. Listened to devotionalsand church services on the radio ortelevision?

291 v291 Do you consider yourselfpersonally Christian

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Do you consider yourself personallyChristian?

292 v292 Highest completed education continuous numeric-2.0 1782 0 What is your highest completededucation?

293 v293 Gross income 2008 continuous numeric-8.0 1782 0 How much was your household's grossincome in 2008? By gross income, Imean collected income before possibletax allowances or expenses, and closerto 1000 kroner.

Group Background variables

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

1 v001 R's age at the time ofinterview

continuous numeric-2.0 1782 0 R's age at the time of interview

2 v002 R's age group, time ofinterview

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 R's age group, time of interview

3 v003 R's gender continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 R's gender

4 v253 Current marital status continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 What is your current marital status? Areyou..

5 v254 Children below the age of 16living with you

continuous numeric-2.0 1782 0 Have you got any children below theage of 16 living with you, if so, howmany?

Page 34: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Variables Group(s)

- 34 -

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

6 v292 Highest completed education continuous numeric-2.0 1782 0 What is your highest completededucation?

Group Income and work

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

1 v255 R. in currently paidemployment

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Are you currently in paid employment?

2 v256 R's normal weekly workinghours

continuous numeric-3.0 1271 511 How many hours a week do you usuallywork in your job?

3 v257 Do you consider yourselfas...?

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Do you consider yourself as...?

4 v258 What is your primary sourceof income?

discrete numeric-40.0 0 1782 What is your primary source of income?

5 v259 R. supervise the work ofothers

continuous numeric-1.0 1177 605 Do you have any tasks which involvedsupervising the work of others?

6 v260 R's primaryoccupation/profession - code

discrete numeric-4.0 1177 605 What is your primaryoccupation/profession?

7 v261 A superior position continuous numeric-1.0 1177 605 Would you say that this is/was asuperior position?

8 v262 Job description continuous numeric-1.0 1177 605 Did you work in your primaryoccupation as an employee, as anindependent with hired help, as anindependent without hired help, or as afamily member with no regular, fixedincome?

9 v263 Employer description continuous numeric-1.0 1064 718 Was this business/industry a privatelyowned firm, a joint-stock company, anorganisation, in municipal, county orpublic service?

10 v264 In paid employment untilthe time began to receive apension/welfare benefit

continuous numeric-1.0 360 1422 Were you in paid employment untilthe time you began to receive apension/welfare benefit?

11 v265 Paid employment previously continuous numeric-1.0 56 1726 Were you in a paid employmentpreviously?

12 v266 Did R. supervise the work ofothers

continuous numeric-1.0 360 1422 Did you have any tasks which involvedsupervising the work of others?

13 v267 R's last primaryoccupation/profession

discrete numeric-4.0 360 1422 What was your last primaryoccupation/profession?

14 v268 R's previous normal workinghours

continuous numeric-3.0 360 1422 How many hours a week did you usuallywork in that job?

15 v269 Former job description continuous numeric-1.0 360 1422 Did you work in your primaryoccupation as an employee, as anindependent with hired help, as anindependent without hired help, or as afamily member with no regular, fixedincome?

16 v270 Superior position? continuous numeric-1.0 315 1467 Would you say that this is/was asuperior position?

17 v271 Former employer description continuous numeric-1.0 315 1467 Was this business/industry a privatelyowned firm, a joint-stock company, anorganisation, in municipal, county orpublic service?

Page 35: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Variables Group(s)

- 35 -

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

18 v272 Spouse/partner currently inpaid employment

continuous numeric-1.0 1209 573 Is your spouse/partner currently in paidemployment?

19 v273 Spouse/partner's mostimportant activity or sourceof income

continuous numeric-1.0 332 1450 What is your spouse/partner's mostimportant activity or source of income?

20 v274 spouse/partner in paidemployment until the timehe/she began to receive apension/welfare benefit?

continuous numeric-1.0 260 1522 Was your spouse/partner in paidemployment until the time he/she beganto receive a pension/welfare benefit?

21 v275 R's spouse supervised thework of others

continuous numeric-1.0 1094 688 Did/does he/she have any tasks whichinvolved supervising the work of others?

22 v276 R's spouse/partner'slast primaryoccupation/profession

discrete numeric-4.0 1094 688 What was your spouse/partner's lastprimary occupation/profession?

23 v277 R's spouse/partner's -superior position

continuous numeric-1.0 1094 688 Would you say your spouse/partner'sprofession/occupation is/was a superiorposition?

24 v278 R's spouse/partner's kind ofbusiness

continuous numeric-1.0 1094 688 Was this business/industry a privatelyowned firm, a joint-stock company, anorganisation, in municipal, county orpublic service?

25 v293 Gross income 2008 continuous numeric-8.0 1782 0 How much was your household's grossincome in 2008? By gross income, Imean collected income before possibletax allowances or expenses, and closerto 1000 kroner.

Group Political affiliation

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

1 v019 Best party on schools andeducation

continuous numeric-2.0 1517 265 We would like to hear how you feelabout the parties' policy on some currentissues. The question is in each casewhich party you consider to have thebest policy - given that you have anopinion on the matter. ... A. Firstly, it'sabout schools and education. Whichparty has, in your opinion, the bestpolicy within this area?

2 v020 Best party when it comes toduty and taxation

continuous numeric-2.0 1560 222 We would like to hear how you feelabout the parties' policy on some currentissues. The question is in each casewhich party you consider to have thebest policy - given that you have anopinion on the matter. ... B. Then it isduty and taxation. Which party has, inyour opinion, the best policy within thisarea?

3 v021 Best party when it comes toimmigration

continuous numeric-2.0 1576 206 We would like to hear how you feelabout the parties' policy on some currentissues. The question is in each casewhich party you consider to have thebest policy - given that you have anopinion on the matter. ... C. When itcomes to immigration. Which party has,in your opinion, the best policy?

4 v022 Best party regardingenvironment conservation

continuous numeric-2.0 1501 281 We would like to hear how you feelabout the parties' policy on some current

Page 36: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Variables Group(s)

- 36 -

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

issues. The question is in each casewhich party you consider to have thebest policy - given that you have anopinion on the matter. ... D. Regardingconservation of the environment. Whatparty has in your opinion the bestpolicy?

5 v023 Best party when it comes totaking care of the elderly

continuous numeric-2.0 1433 349 We would like to hear how you feelabout the parties' policy on some currentissues. The question is in each casewhich party you consider to have thebest policy - given that you have anopinion on the matter. ... E. When itcomes to taking care of the elderly;which party has, in your opinion, thebest policy?

6 v024 Best party when it comes totransport policy

continuous numeric-2.0 1402 380 We would like to hear how you feelabout the parties' policy on some currentissues. The question is in each casewhich party you consider to have thebest policy - given that you have anopinion on the matter. ... F. When itcomes to transport policy; which partyhas, in your opinion, the best policy?

7 v025 Best party on issuesconcerning children andfamily

continuous numeric-2.0 1487 295 We would like to hear how you feelabout the parties' policy on some currentissues. The question is in each casewhich party you consider to have thebest policy - given that you have anopinion on the matter. ... G. Issuesconcerning children and family. Whichparty has, in your opinion, the bestpolicy?

8 v026 Best party regarding regionalpolicy

continuous numeric-2.0 1423 359 We would like to hear how you feelabout the parties' policy on some currentissues. The question is in each casewhich party you consider to have thebest policy - given that you have anopinion on the matter. ... H. Regardingregional policy. Which party has, inyour opinion, the best policy?

9 v027 Best party regarding fightingunemployment

continuous numeric-2.0 1520 262 We would like to hear how you feelabout the parties' policy on some currentissues. The question is in each casewhich party you consider to have thebest policy - given that you have anopinion on the matter. ... I. Regardingfighting unemployment; Which partyhas, in your opinion, the best policy?

10 v100 Any party that represents R'sviews

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Would you say that any of the partiesin Norway represents your viewsreasonably well?

11 v101 Which party R's views best continuous numeric-2.0 1470 312 Which party represents your views best?

12 v102 Specified discrete character-30 5 0 Specify which other party you have inmind.

13 v103 Any party leader thatrepresents R's view

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Regardless of how you feel aboutthe parties, would you say any of theindividual party leaders represents yourviews reasonably well?

14 v104 The party leader thatrepresents R's views best

continuous numeric-2.0 1307 475 Which party leader represents yourviews best?

Page 37: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Variables Group(s)

- 37 -

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

15 v105 Specify discrete character-30 9 0 Specify which other party leader youhave in mind.

16 v107 Appreciation of ChristianDemocratic Party

continuous numeric-2.0 1743 39 I would now like to know what youthink of each of the political parties.After I have read the name of a politicalparty would you please rate it on a scaleranging from 0 to 10, where 0 meansthat you strongly dislike that party and10 means that you strongly like thatparty. ... A. Where would you placeChristian people's party (Krf) on thisscale?

17 v108 Appreciation of the LiberalParty

continuous numeric-2.0 1726 56 I would now like to know what youthink of each of the political parties.After I have read the name of a politicalparty would you please rate it on a scaleranging from 0 to 10, where 0 meansthat you strongly dislike that party and10 means that you strongly like thatparty. ... B. Where would you placeLiberal party (V) on this scale?

18 v109 Appreciation of the CenterParty

continuous numeric-2.0 1732 50 I would now like to know what youthink of each of the political parties.After I have read the name of a politicalparty would you please rate it on a scaleranging from 0 to 10, where 0 meansthat you strongly dislike that party and10 means that you strongly like thatparty. ... C. Where would you placeCenter party (SP) on this scale?

19 v110 Appreciation of the SocialistLeft Party

continuous numeric-2.0 1736 46 I would now like to know what youthink of each of the political parties.After I have read the name of a politicalparty would you please rate it on a scaleranging from 0 to 10, where 0 meansthat you strongly dislike that party and10 means that you strongly like thatparty. ... D. Where would you placeSocial left party (SV) on this scale?

20 v111 Appreciation of theConservative Party

continuous numeric-2.0 1740 42 I would now like to know what youthink of each of the political parties.After I have read the name of a politicalparty would you please rate it on a scaleranging from 0 to 10, where 0 meansthat you strongly dislike that party and10 means that you strongly like thatparty. ... E. Where would you placeConservative party (H) on this scale?

21 v112 Appreciation of the LabourParty

continuous numeric-2.0 1748 34 I would now like to know what youthink of each of the political parties.After I have read the name of a politicalparty would you please rate it on a scaleranging from 0 to 10, where 0 meansthat you strongly dislike that party and10 means that you strongly like thatparty. ... F. Where would you placeLabour party (DNA) on this scale?

22 v113 Appreciation of the ProgressParty

continuous numeric-2.0 1747 35 I would now like to know what youthink of each of the political parties.After I have read the name of a politicalparty would you please rate it on a scaleranging from 0 to 10, where 0 means

Page 38: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Variables Group(s)

- 38 -

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

that you strongly dislike that party and10 means that you strongly like thatparty. ... G. Where would you placeProgress party (FRP) on this scale?

23 v114 Appreciation of the RedElectoral Alliance

continuous numeric-2.0 1688 94 I would now like to know what youthink of each of the political parties.After I have read the name of a politicalparty would you please rate it on a scaleranging from 0 to 10, where 0 meansthat you strongly dislike that party and10 means that you strongly like thatparty. ... H. Where would you place Redelectoral alliance (RV) on this scale?

24 v115 Like/dislike: DagfinnHøybråten

continuous numeric-2.0 1727 55 After I have read you the name of apolitical leader, would you please ratehim or her on a scale ranging from 0to 10, where 0 means that you stronglydislike that politician, and 10 meansthat you like the politician very much.... A. Where would you place DagfinnHøybråten on this scale?

25 v116 Like/dislike: Lars Sponheim continuous numeric-2.0 1731 51 After I have read you the name of apolitical leader, would you please ratehim or her on a scale ranging from 0to 10, where 0 means that you stronglydislike that politician, and 10 means thatyou like the politician very much. ... B.Where would you place Lars Sponheimon this scale?

26 v117 Like/dislike: Liv SigneNavarsete

continuous numeric-2.0 1683 99 After I have read you the name of apolitical leader, would you please ratehim or her on a scale ranging from 0to 10, where 0 means that you stronglydislike that politician, and 10 meansthat you like the politician very much.... C. Where would you place Liv SigneNavarsete on this scale?

27 v118 Like/dislike: KristinHalvorsen

continuous numeric-2.0 1746 36 After I have read you the name of apolitical leader, would you please ratehim or her on a scale ranging from 0to 10, where 0 means that you stronglydislike that politician, and 10 meansthat you like the politician very much.... D. Where would you place KristinHalvorsen on this scale?

28 v119 Like/dislike: Erna Solberg continuous numeric-2.0 1748 34 After I have read you the name of apolitical leader, would you please ratehim or her on a scale ranging from 0to 10, where 0 means that you stronglydislike that politician, and 10 means thatyou like the politician very much. ... E.Where would you place Erna Solberg onthis scale?

29 v120 Like/dislike: Siv Jensen continuous numeric-2.0 1751 31 After I have read you the name of apolitical leader, would you please ratehim or her on a scale ranging from 0to 10, where 0 means that you stronglydislike that politician, and 10 means thatyou like the politician very much. ... F.Where would you place Siv Jensen onthis scale?

Page 39: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Variables Group(s)

- 39 -

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

30 v121 Like/dislike: Torstein Dahle continuous numeric-2.0 1399 383 After I have read you the name of apolitical leader, would you please ratehim or her on a scale ranging from 0to 10, where 0 means that you stronglydislike that politician, and 10 means thatyou like the politician very much. ... G.Where would you place Torstein Dahleon this scale?

31 v122 Like/dislike: Jens Stoltenberg continuous numeric-2.0 1754 28 After I have read you the name of apolitical leader, would you please ratehim or her on a scale ranging from 0to 10, where 0 means that you stronglydislike that politician, and 10 means thatyou like the politician very much. ... H.Where would you place Jens Stoltenbergon this scale?

32 v135 Party affiliation continuous numeric-2.0 930 852 Many people think of themselves asadherents of a particular party, whileothers feel no affiliation with any party.Would you say that you in generalthink of yourself as a Conservative, aLaborite a SV supporter etc., or don'tyou consider yourself affiliated with anyparticular party?

33 v136 Strongly convinced supporter continuous numeric-1.0 930 852 Do you consider yourself to be astrongly convinced supporter, or are younot a particularly convinced supporter ofthis party?

34 v152 Government was importantfor voting

continuous numeric-1.0 1765 17 Before the election, there werediscussions about which governmentthe country would get. How importantwas this topic for your vote? Would yousay...

35 v153 Preferred government option continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Before the election this year, it has beendiscussed several different governmentoptions. Which of the following optionsdo you prefer yourself?

36 v154 Specify other governmentoptions

discrete character-100 119 0 Specify other government options.

37 v155 Parties R. doesn't want to bepart of the Government

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Is there any party or parties youdefinitely don't want to take office andbe part of the Government?

38 v156 Should not form agovernment: Red ElectoralAlliance

continuous numeric-1.0 1471 311 Which party or parties is that? ... A. RedElectoral Alliance

39 v157 Should not form agovernment: SV

continuous numeric-1.0 1471 311 Which party or parties is that? ... B.Social Left Party (SV)

40 v158 Should not form agovernment: DNA

continuous numeric-1.0 1471 311 Which party or parties is that? ... C.Labour Party (DNA)

41 v159 Should not form agovernment: V

continuous numeric-1.0 1471 311 Which party or parties is that? ... D.Liberal Party (V)

42 v160 Should not form agovernment: Krf

continuous numeric-1.0 1471 311 Which party or parties is that? ... E.Christian People's Party (KrF)

43 v161 Should not form agovernment: SP

continuous numeric-1.0 1471 311 Which party or parties is that? ... F.Center Party (SP)

44 v162 Should not form agovernment: H

continuous numeric-1.0 1471 311 Which party or parties is that? ... G.Conservative Party (H)

Page 40: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Variables Group(s)

- 40 -

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

45 v163 Should not form agovernment: Frp

continuous numeric-1.0 1471 311 Which party or parties is that? ... H.Progress Party (FrP)

46 v164 Should not form agovernment: Other parties

continuous numeric-1.0 1471 311 Which party or parties is that? ... I.Other parties

Group Political interest/participation

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

1 v004 Political interest continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Let us begin with a question dealingwith political interest. Would you saythat you are …

2 v005 How often talked about theelection

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 We would like to hear whether youhave participated in political discussionsor talks before the election this year.How often did you talk about theelection in the family or with friends andacquaintances. Would you say about ...

3 v006 Cared about which partyor parties won or lost theelection

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Looking back on the election this fall,would you say that you personally careda great deal about which party or partieswon or lost the election, did you care tosome degree, or didn't it matter to youpersonally?

4 v055 Signed your name under anyappeal, protest, petition

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 We now turn to a number of questionsconcerning various political activitiesin which it is possible to participate.During the course of the past four years,have you: ... A. signed your name underany appeal, protest, petition, etc. inorder to advance a particular politicalcause?

5 v056 Written through internet,e-mail or text-message

continuous numeric-1.0 502 1280 Did any of this happen through internet,e-mail or text-message?

6 v057 Taken part in anydemonstration/action

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 We now turn to a number of questionsconcerning various political activitiesin which it is possible to participate.During the course of the past fouryears, have you: ... B. Taken part in anydemonstration/action etc. to advance aparticular cause?

7 v058 Written to newspaper toadvance political cause

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 We now turn to a number of questionsconcerning various political activitiesin which it is possible to participate.During the course of the past fouryears, have you: ... C. Written tosome newspaper in order to advance aparticular political cause?

8 v059 Taken up a particular issuewithin a political party

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 We now turn to a number of questionsconcerning various political activitiesin which it is possible to participate.During the course of the past four years,have you: ... D. Taken up a particularissue within a political party, tradeunion, or other organizations?

9 v060 Forwarded any writtencomplaints tot he authorities

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 We now turn to a number of questionsconcerning various political activitiesin which it is possible to participate.During the course of the past four years,have you: ... E. forwarded any written

Page 41: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Variables Group(s)

- 41 -

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

complaints, presented other politicalproposals etc. to the authorities?

10 v061 Written through internet,e-mail or text-message

continuous numeric-1.0 152 1630 Did any of this happen through internet,e-mail or text-message?

11 v062 Boycotted products forpolitical or ethical reasons

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 We now turn to a number of questionsconcerning various political activitiesin which it is possible to participate.During the course of the past four years,have you: ... F. Boycotted products forpolitical or ethical reasons?

12 v063 Participated in discussionsabout social issues on theInternet

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 We now turn to a number of questionsconcerning various political activitiesin which it is possible to participate.During the course of the past fouryears, have you: ... G. Participated indiscussions about social issues on theInternet?

13 v064 Been in contact with apolitician to promote aparticular political issue

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 We now turn to a number of questionsconcerning various political activitiesin which it is possible to participate.During the course of the past four years,have you: ... H. Been in contact witha politician to promote a particularpolitical issue?

14 v065 Did any of this happenthrough internet, e-mail ortext-message

continuous numeric-1.0 285 1497 Did any of this happen through internet,e-mail or text-message?

15 v066 Dues-paying member of anypolitical party

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 We now turn to a number of questionsconcerning various political activitiesin which it is possible to participate.During the course of the past four years,have you: ... I. Are you at the presenta dues-paying member of any politicalparty?

16 v067 Taken batch tests before theelection

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 We now turn to a number of questionsconcerning various political activitiesin which it is possible to participate.During the course of the past four years,have you: ... J. Have you taken one ormore of the so-called batch tests on thenet before the election this year?

17 v068 Batch tests importance continuous numeric-1.0 683 1099 How important was this for your choiceof party? Was it of...

18 v177 Differences between theparties at Stortinget

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 How much do you generally think thatthe parties in Stortinget differ fromone another. Would you say that thedifferences are large, quite large, notparticularly large or is there not muchdifference at all?

Group Voting

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

1 v007 1. issue important for voting discrete character-40 1760 0 Can you name one or two issues whichhad particular influence on the way youvoted? ... A. Issue 1

2 v008 2. issue important for voting discrete character-40 1476 0 Can you name one or two issues whichhad particular influence on the way youvoted? ... B. Issue 2

Page 42: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Variables Group(s)

- 42 -

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

3 v084 Commitment to vote at theStorting (national parliament)election

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 What do you think about thecommitment to vote at the Storting(national parliament) election?Would you say is an extremelylarge commitment, a rather largecommitment, a small commitment or nocommitment at all?

4 v212 Vote in the election continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Did you vote in the election this fall?

5 v213 If had voted: Red/RedElectoral Alliance

continuous numeric-1.0 194 1588 Let us imagine that you had voted,which party or parties would you votefor? ... A. Red/Red Electoral Alliance

6 v214 If had voted: SV continuous numeric-1.0 194 1588 Let us imagine that you had voted,which party or parties would you votefor? ... B. Social Left Party (SV)

7 v215 If had voted: DNA continuous numeric-1.0 194 1588 Let us imagine that you had voted,which party or parties would you votefor? ... C. Labour Party (DNA)

8 v216 If had voted: V continuous numeric-1.0 194 1588 Let us imagine that you had voted,which party or parties would you votefor? ... D. Liberal Party (V)

9 v217 If had voted: Krf continuous numeric-1.0 194 1588 Let us imagine that you had voted,which party or parties would you votefor? ... E. Christian People's Party (KrF)

10 v218 If had voted: SP continuous numeric-1.0 194 1588 Let us imagine that you had voted,which party or parties would you votefor? ... F. Center Party (Sp)

11 v219 If had voted: H continuous numeric-1.0 194 1588 Let us imagine that you had voted,which party or parties would you votefor? ... G. Conservative Party (H)

12 v220 If had voted: Frp continuous numeric-1.0 194 1588 Let us imagine that you had voted,which party or parties would you votefor? ... H. Progress Party (FrP)

13 v221 If had voted: Andre partier continuous numeric-1.0 194 1588 Let us imagine that you had voted,which party or parties would you votefor? ... I. Other parties/lists

14 v222 If had voted: Stemme blankt continuous numeric-1.0 194 1588 Let us imagine that you had voted,which party or parties would you votefor? ... J. Blank vote

15 v223 Specify other parties/lists discrete character-30 0 0 La oss tenke oss at du likevel haddestemt, hvilket parti eller partier ville duda ha stemt på? ... I. Other parties/lists ...A. Specify

16 v224 Which party or list did youvote for

continuous numeric-2.0 1578 204 Which party or list did you vote for?

17 v225 Specify other parties/lists discrete character-30 7 0 Specify other parties/lists

18 v226 Other parties also consideredvoting for

continuous numeric-1.0 1557 225 Was there any other parties you alsoconsidered voting for?

19 v227 Considered voting for:Red/Red Electoral Alliance

continuous numeric-1.0 958 824 Which party or parties is this? ... A.Red/Red Electoral Alliance

20 v228 Considered voting for: SV continuous numeric-1.0 958 824 Which party or parties is this? ... B.Social Left Party (SV)

21 v229 Considered voting for: DNA continuous numeric-1.0 958 824 Which party or parties is this? ... C.Labour Party (DNA)

Page 43: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Variables Group(s)

- 43 -

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

22 v230 Considered voting for: V continuous numeric-1.0 958 824 Which party or parties is this? ... D.Liberal Party (V)

23 v231 Considered voting for: Krf continuous numeric-1.0 958 824 Which party or parties is this? ... E.Christian People's Party (KrF)

24 v232 Considered voting for: SP continuous numeric-1.0 958 824 Which party or parties is this? ... F.Center Party (Sp)

25 v233 Considered voting for: H continuous numeric-1.0 958 824 Which party or parties is this? ... G.Conservative Party (H)

26 v234 Considered voting for: Frp continuous numeric-1.0 958 824 Which party or parties is this? ... H.Progress Party (FrP)

27 v235 Considered voting for: Otherparties/lists

continuous numeric-1.0 958 824 Which party or parties is this? ... I.Other parties/lists

28 v236 Specify other parties -considered voting

discrete character-30 9 0 Which party or parties is this? ... I.Other parties/lists ... A. Specify

29 v237 Parties never would havevoted for

continuous numeric-1.0 1557 225 Are there any parties you would neverhave voted for?

30 v238 Parties never would havevoted for: Red/Red ElectoralAlliance

continuous numeric-1.0 1459 323 Which party or parties is this? ... A.Red/Red Electoral Alliance

31 v239 Parties never would havevoted for: SV

continuous numeric-1.0 1459 323 Which party or parties is this? ... B.Social Left Party (SV)

32 v240 Parties never would havevoted for: DNA

continuous numeric-1.0 1459 323 Which party or parties is this? ... C.Labour Party (DNA)

33 v241 Parties never would havevoted for: V

continuous numeric-1.0 1459 323 Which party or parties is this? ... D.Liberal Party (V)

34 v242 Parties never would havevoted for: Krf

continuous numeric-1.0 1459 323 Which party or parties is this? ... E.Christian People's Party (KrF)

35 v243 Parties never would havevoted for: SP

continuous numeric-1.0 1459 323 Which party or parties is this? ... F.Center Party (Sp)

36 v244 Parties never would havevoted for: H

continuous numeric-1.0 1459 323 Which party or parties is this? ... G.Conservative Party (H)

37 v245 Parties never would havevoted for: Frp

continuous numeric-1.0 1459 323 Which party or parties is this? ... H.Progress Party (FrP)

38 v246 Parties never would havevoted for: Andre partier

continuous numeric-1.0 1459 323 Which party or parties is this? ... I.Other parties/lists

39 v247 Specify other parties - notconsidered voting

discrete numeric-30.0 1 1781 Hvilket parti eller hvilke partier vardette? ... I. Other parties/lists ... A.Specify

40 v248 Difficulties with votedecision

continuous numeric-1.0 1557 225 Some people say that it was very easyto make up their minds in this election,while others found it very difficult. Howdid you find it, was it …

41 v249 Decided - election campaign continuous numeric-1.0 1557 225 When you decided upon the party youvoted for - was it a long time beforethe election campaign started, was it atsome point during the election campaignor was it right before polling day?

42 v250 Vote in advance continuous numeric-1.0 1392 390 Did you make use of the arrangementthat allows you to cast your vote inadvance, or did you cast your vote at aregular polling station?

Page 44: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Variables Group(s)

- 44 -

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

43 v251 Voted previous Stortingelection

continuous numeric-2.0 1782 0 If we turn to the previous Stortingelection. Who did you vote for in theStorting election in 2005?

44 v252 Specify other party voted forthe previous Storting election

discrete character-30 4 0 Specify other party voted for theprevious Storting election

Group Political attitudes

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

1 v009 Norway's aid to developingcountries

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Some people think that the amount ofaid Norway gives to poor countries,the so-called developing countries,should be cut back, while others believeit should be maintained at the presentlevel, or even increased. What is yourposition, do you think that the amountof aid Norway gives to the developingcountries should be cut back, should itbe maintained at the present level, orshould it be increased?

2 v010 View on alcohol regulations continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 In this country, as you know, the publicauthorities have put into effect manyregulations governing the use of alcohol.How do you regard these regulations: doyou consider them to be too severe, ordo you fell they are too lenient?

3 v011 The old and well proven isbetter than new-fangled ideas

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Now we come to a number of opinionswhich are sometimes heard to beexpressed. For each of the followingstatements that I read out, can you tellme whether you react with the completeagreement, qualified agreement,qualified disagreement, or completedisagreement? ... A. The old andwell proven is usually better thannew-fangled ideas.

4 v012 Should allow oil andgas extraction, Lofoten,Vesterålen.

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Now we come to a number of opinionswhich are sometimes heard to beexpressed. For each of the followingstatements that I read out, can you tellme whether you react with the completeagreement, qualified agreement,qualified disagreement, or completedisagreement? ... B. We should allow oiland gas extraction outside Lofoten andVesterålen.

5 v013 Too little emphasis onenvironmental protection

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Now we come to a number of opinionswhich are sometimes heard to beexpressed. For each of the followingstatements that I read out, can you tellme whether you react with the completeagreement, qualified agreement,qualified disagreement, or completedisagreement? ... C. There is too littleemphasis on environmental protection intoday's Norway.

6 v014 Immigration represents agrave threat to our nation'scharacter

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Now we come to a number of opinionswhich are sometimes heard to beexpressed. For each of the followingstatements that I read out, can you tellme whether you react with the complete

Page 45: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Variables Group(s)

- 45 -

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

agreement, qualified agreement,qualified disagreement, or completedisagreement? ... D. Immigrationrepresents a grave threat to our nation'scharacter

7 v015 Full employment- the statemore influence

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Now we come to a number of opinionswhich are sometimes heard to beexpressed. For each of the followingstatements that I read out, can you tellme whether you react with the completeagreement, qualified agreement,qualified disagreement, or completedisagreement? ... E. Full employmentcan be more easily secured if the stategets more impact over the banks 'andcompanies' business.

8 v016 Open for considerablereductions of duties and taxes

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Now we come to a number of opinionswhich are sometimes heard to beexpressed. For each of the followingstatements that I read out, can youtell me whether you react withthe complete agreement, qualifiedagreement, qualified disagreement,or complete disagreement? ... F. Thecurrent economic situation is open forconsiderable reductions of duties andtaxes

9 v017 Banks and industry will havetoo much influence.

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Now we come to a number of opinionswhich are sometimes heard to beexpressed. For each of the followingstatements that I read out, can you tellme whether you react with the completeagreement, qualified agreement,qualified disagreement, or completedisagreement? ... G. If the communitycan't control the private industry, theleaders of banks and industry will havetoo much influence.

10 v018 Not take much account ofwhat ordinary people think

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Now we come to a number of opinionswhich are sometimes heard to beexpressed. For each of the followingstatements that I read out, can you tellme whether you react with the completeagreement, qualified agreement,qualified disagreement, or completedisagreement? ... H. Those who sit in theStorting does not take much account ofwhat ordinary people think and believe.

11 v028 Environmental protection continuous numeric-2.0 1764 18 First, we have the issue concerningnature conservation and environmentalprotection. The value 0 expresses thedesire that environmental protectionmeasures should not be taken so far asto affect our standard of living, whilethe value 10 expresses the desire to seemore done for environmental protection,even if it means a considerablereduction in the standard of living foreverybody, yourself included. Wherewould you place yourself on this scale,or have you not you given this issuemuch thought?

12 v029 Norwegian immigrationpolicy

continuous numeric-2.0 1782 0 Then there is the question of Norwegianimmigration policy. The value 0

Page 46: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Variables Group(s)

- 46 -

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

expresses the view that we shouldmake it easier for immigrants toenter Norway; while the value 10expresses the opinion that the number ofimmigrants coming to Norway shouldbe restricted to an even greater extentthan at present. Where would you placeyourself on this scale, or haven't yougiven much thought to this issue?

13 v030 Religious education continuous numeric-2.0 1782 0 Where would you place yourself on ascale from 0 to 10 where 0 expresses theview that the teaching of Christianityshould be compulsory in primaryschool, while 10 expresses the view thatthe teaching of Christianity should bevoluntary in primary school?

14 v031 Peripheral areas continuous numeric-2.0 1782 0 Where would you place yourself ona scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0means that the central Government isalready paying too much attention to theneeds of peripheral areas, whereas 10means that the central Government doesnot pay enough attention to the needs ofperipheral areas?

15 v032 EU membership continuous numeric-2.0 1782 0 Where would you place yourself ona scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0signifies the desire that Norway shoulddefinitely not be a member of the EU,whilst 10 signifies that Norway shoulddefinitely become a member.

16 v033 Climate change continuous numeric-2.0 1765 17 Over to your opinion on climate change.Where would you place yourself ona scale ranging from 0 to 10, where0 means that climate change is not aproblem, whereas 10 means that climatechange is a major problem?

17 v034 Big cities should keepsignifically more of theirown tax income

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 For each of the statements that I read,can you tell me whether you reactwith complete agreement, qualifiedagreement, qualified disagreement,or complete disagreement? ... A. Bigcities should keep significally more oftheir own tax income than what they arepresently allowed to.

18 v035 We should invest more inwind power

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 For each of the statements that I read,can you tell me whether you reactwith complete agreement, qualifiedagreement, qualified disagreement,or complete disagreement? ... B. Weshould invest more in wind power.

19 v036 Reduce economic differences continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 For each of the statements that I read,can you tell me whether you reactwith complete agreement, qualifiedagreement, qualified disagreement, orcomplete disagreement? ... C. Economicdifferences are still so large that in thiscountry the government must see it as amain task to reduce them.

20 v037 Politics is often socomplicated

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 For each of the statements that I read,can you tell me whether you reactwith complete agreement, qualifiedagreement, qualified disagreement, or

Page 47: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Variables Group(s)

- 47 -

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

complete disagreement? ... D. Politicsis often so complicated that ordinarycitizens cannot understand what is goingon.

21 v038 The church should beseparated from the state

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 For each of the statements that I read,can you tell me whether you reactwith complete agreement, qualifiedagreement, qualified disagreement,or complete disagreement? ... E. Thechurch should be separated from thestate.

22 v039 The settlement on cashbenefit should be removed

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 For each of the statements that I read,can you tell me whether you reactwith complete agreement, qualifiedagreement, qualified disagreement,or complete disagreement? ... F. Thesettlement on cash benefit should beremoved.

23 v040 Norwegian jobs beforereduction of greenhouse gasemission

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 For each of the statements that I read,can you tell me whether you reactwith complete agreement, qualifiedagreement, qualified disagreement,or complete disagreement? ... G. Theconsideration to Norwegian jobs is moreimportant than reducing the emission ofgreenhouse gases.

24 v041 Should strengthen theNorwegian Armed Forces

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 For each of the statements that I read,can you tell me whether you reactwith complete agreement, qualifiedagreement, qualified disagreement,or complete disagreement? ... H. Weshould strengthen the Norwegian ArmedForces in the years ahead.

25 v085 Most important challenge,Norway

discrete character-40 1774 0 Now we turn to a few questionsconcerning challenges Norway is facingtoday as a nation. What is in youropinion the most important challenge?And what is the second most important?... A. Answer 1

26 v086 Second most importantchallenge, Norway

discrete character-40 1587 0 Now we turn to a few questionsconcerning challenges Norway is facingtoday as a nation. What is in youropinion the most important challenge?And what is the second most important?... B. Answer 2

27 v087 Party best - handling themost important challenge

continuous numeric-2.0 1400 382 If you think about the most importantchallenge: Which party do you thinkhandles it the best?

28 v088 Party best - handling thesecond most importantchallenge

continuous numeric-2.0 1309 473 If you think about the second mostimportant challenge: Which party doyou think handles it the best?

29 v089 Attitude towards abortion continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Now we turn to the abortion debate. Wehave summed up a few different pointsof view that are expressed in this debate.Which of these statements correspondsthe most with your own opinion?

30 v090 Accept bigger differences inwage levels

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 We have some more statements.We will continue to use the answeralternatives: strongly agree, agreesomewhat, disagree somewhat andstrongly disagree. Would you please tell

Page 48: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Variables Group(s)

- 48 -

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

me which of the answers you choosefor each statement I read you? ... A.To exhort people to greater effort,we should be willing to accept biggerdifferences in wage levels.

31 v091 First and foremost providejobs for Norwegians

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 We have some more statements.We will continue to use the answeralternatives: strongly agree, agreesomewhat, disagree somewhat andstrongly disagree. Would you please tellme which of the answers you choosefor each statement I read you? ... B.When times are bad, we should first andforemost provide jobs for Norwegians.

32 v092 Should allow commercialprivate schools

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 We have some more statements.We will continue to use the answeralternatives: strongly agree, agreesomewhat, disagree somewhat andstrongly disagree. Would you please tellme which of the answers you choosefor each statement I read you? ... C.We should allow commercial privateschools.

33 v093 Rather develop publicservices than to reducetaxation

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 We have some more statements.We will continue to use the answeralternatives: strongly agree, agreesomewhat, disagree somewhat andstrongly disagree. Would you please tellme which of the answers you choosefor each statement I read you? ... D. Itis more important to develop publicservices than to reduce taxation.

34 v094 Build gasworks even thoughCO2 cleaning won't bepossible

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 We have some more statements.We will continue to use the answeralternatives: strongly agree, agreesomewhat, disagree somewhat andstrongly disagree. Would you please tellme which of the answers you choosefor each statement I read you? ... E. Weshould build gasworks even though CO2cleaning won't be possible with today'stechnology.

35 v095 Immigrants should have thesame rights to social benefits

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 We have some more statements.We will continue to use the answeralternatives: strongly agree, agreesomewhat, disagree somewhat andstrongly disagree. Would you please tellme which of the answers you choosefor each statement I read you? ... F.Refugees and immigrants should havethe same rights to social benefits fromthe state as Norwegians even thoughthey are not Norwegian citizens.

36 v096 Politicians don't understandthe country side in Norway.

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 We have some more statements.We will continue to use the answeralternatives: strongly agree, agreesomewhat, disagree somewhat andstrongly disagree. Would you please tellme which of the answers you choosefor each statement I read you? ... G.Politicians and bureaucrats in Oslo don'tunderstand what's really going on in thecountry side in Norway.

Page 49: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Variables Group(s)

- 49 -

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

37 v097 It is important that we signinternational agreements

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 We have some more statements.We will continue to use the answeralternatives: strongly agree, agreesomewhat, disagree somewhat andstrongly disagree. Would you please tellme which of the answers you choosefor each statement I read you? ... H. Itis important that we sign internationalagreements even if that limits norwegianauthorities' freedom of action

38 v098 Importance of who's inpower

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Some people say it makes a bigdifference who is in power. Otherssay that it doesn't make any differencewho is in power. Using a scale rangingfrom 1 to 5, where one means that itmakes a big difference who is in powerand 5 means that it doesn't make anydifference who is in power. Wherewould you place yourself?

39 v099 Importance of who peoplevote for

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Some people say that no matter whopeople vote for, it won't make anydifference to what happens. Others saythat who people vote for can make abig difference to what happens. Usinga scale ranging from 1 to 5, where1 means that voting won't make anydifference to what happens and 5 meansthat voting can make a big difference,where would you place yourself?

40 v134 Satisfied with the waydemocracy works in Norway

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 All things considered, are you verysatisfied, quite satisfied, not quitesatisfied or not satisfied at all with theway democracy works in Norway?

41 v181 Reduce state control overprivate industry

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 I will once more read you somestatements about political questions.Could you for each statement say ifyou strongly agree, agree somewhat,disagree somewhat or if you stronglydisagree? ... A. We should reduce statecontrol over private industry.

42 v182 Secure economic growth -develop our industry

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 I will once more read you somestatements about political questions.Could you for each statement say ifyou strongly agree, agree somewhat,disagree somewhat or if you stronglydisagree? ... B. To secure economicgrowth we need to develop our industryeven if it conflicts with environmentalconsiderations.

43 v183 Public activities could havebeen done better, if left toprivate.

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 I will once more read you somestatements about political questions.Could you for each statement say ifyou strongly agree, agree somewhat,disagree somewhat or if you stronglydisagree? ... C. Many public activitiescould have been done better andcheaper, if they were handed over toprivate operators.

44 v184 High incomes should be putunder harder taxation

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 I will once more read you somestatements about political questions.Could you for each statement say ifyou strongly agree, agree somewhat,

Page 50: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Variables Group(s)

- 50 -

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

disagree somewhat or if you stronglydisagree? ... D. High incomes should beput under harder taxation than they aretoday.

45 v185 International orientation isimportant

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 I will once more read you somestatements about political questions.Could you for each statement say ifyou strongly agree, agree somewhat,disagree somewhat or if you stronglydisagree? ... E. We should go for asociety that has a more internationalorientation, with less emphasis onboundaries between peoples andcountries.

46 v186 Christian values are moreprominent

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 I will once more read you somestatements about political questions.Could you for each statement say ifyou strongly agree, agree somewhat,disagree somewhat or if you stronglydisagree? ... F. We should promote asociety where Christian values are moreprominent.

47 v187 Globalisation is absolutelynecessary to secure economicgrowth

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 I will once more read you somestatements about political questions.Could you for each statement say ifyou strongly agree, agree somewhat,disagree somewhat or if you stronglydisagree? ... G. Globalisation isabsolutely necessary to secure economicgrowth.

48 v188 New technology will solvethe problem of climatechange

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 I will once more read you somestatements about political questions.Could you for each statement say ifyou strongly agree, agree somewhat,disagree somewhat or if you stronglydisagree? ... H. New technology willsolve the problem of climate changewithout us reducing our standard ofliving.

49 v189 Significance of mediacoverage

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 If we look back on the coverage ofthe election campaign on television,radio and in the newspapers as a whole,what impact has it had on your votingdecision/your decision not to vote.Would you say..

50 v198 Social security schemes continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Let's look at the scope of all ourbenefits. Some believe that we havegradually received more than enoughof benefits, and that we should seek tolimit them in the future, while othersargue that we should maintain our socialsecurity schemes, and if necessarydevelop them further. What is youropinion? Do you think that in the futurethere should be less benefits, that theyshould be maintained as they are now,or that they should be increased?

51 v199 Spending oil income continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Let us imagine two persons A and Bdiscussing a question of current interest.We have listed two statements thetwo persons put forward. A says: Toavoid an increase in interest, and higherprices, we should not use more of the oil

Page 51: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Variables Group(s)

- 51 -

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

income than we do at present. B says:To solve current problems in society wemay use considerably more of the oilincome than we do at present. Whichone of these persons would you agreemore with?

52 v200 Choice of freedom forcitizens

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 There is also a discussion about greaterchoice of freedom for citizens, forexample between public or privateproviders of service tasks, or betweendifferent public institutions. A says:There should be introduced, to a greaterextent than now, more freedom ofchoice in the public sector. B says: Thechice of freedom for citizens today isadequate. Which one of these personswould you agree more with?

53 v201 Society's social reforms continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Now a question about society's socialspending. A says: We have gone toofar with social reforms in this country.People should to a greater degree thannow manage without social benefits andcontributions from the community. Bsays: The social reforms that have beenimplemented should be maintained forat least the same extent as now. Whichone of these persons would you agreemore with?

54 v202 Misuse of our welfarebenefits

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Do you think that our welfare benefitsare misused greatly, in some degree or asmall degree?

55 v203 Can vote, but can't doanything else to influencepolitics

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Now let's take a look at somestatements. We will continue to usethe answer alternatives: strongly agree,agree somewhat, disagree somewhat andstrongly disagree. ... A. People like mecan vote, but we can't do anything elseto influence politics.

56 v204 Climate change is mainlymanmade.

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Now let's take a look at somestatements. We will continue to usethe answer alternatives: strongly agree,agree somewhat, disagree somewhat andstrongly disagree. ... B. Climate changeis mainly manmade.

57 v205 Equal adoption rightsfor homosexuals andheterosexuals

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Now let's take a look at somestatements. We will continue to usethe answer alternatives: strongly agree,agree somewhat, disagree somewhat andstrongly disagree. ... C. There should beequal adoption rights for homosexualsand heterosexuals.

58 v206 Not possible to maintain thewelfare state

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Now let's take a look at somestatements. We will continue to usethe answer alternatives: strongly agree,agree somewhat, disagree somewhat andstrongly disagree. ... D. In the longerterm it is not possible to maintain thewelfare state at the present level.

59 v207 Not Norwgian citizens-expelled if commit criminalact

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Now let's take a look at somestatements. We will continue to usethe answer alternatives: strongly agree,agree somewhat, disagree somewhat and

Page 52: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Variables Group(s)

- 52 -

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

strongly disagree. ... E. If immigrantswithout Norwegian citizenship commit acriminal act, they should be sent out.

60 v208 Should build morewaterways.

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Now let's take a look at somestatements. We will continue to usethe answer alternatives: strongly agree,agree somewhat, disagree somewhat andstrongly disagree. ... F. We should buildmore waterways.

61 v209 More state institutions shouldbe moved

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Now let's take a look at somestatements. We will continue to usethe answer alternatives: strongly agree,agree somewhat, disagree somewhatand strongly disagree. ... G. More stateinstitutions should be moved to districtareas.

62 v210 Should allow euthanasia. continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Now let's take a look at somestatements. We will continue to usethe answer alternatives: strongly agree,agree somewhat, disagree somewhat andstrongly disagree. ... H. We should alloweuthanasia.

63 v211 Wealth tax should beabolished.

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Now let's take a look at somestatements. We will continue to usethe answer alternatives: strongly agree,agree somewhat, disagree somewhatand strongly disagree. ... I. Wealth taxshould be abolished.

Group Attitudes towards politicians

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

1 v176 Respresentatives' knowledgeof people's views

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Some people say that the members ofthe Storting know what ordinary peoplethink. Others say that the members ofthe Storting don't know much aboutwhat ordinary people think. Using thescale on this card, (where one meansthat the members of the Storting knowwhat ordinary people think, and fivemeans that the members of the Stortingdon't know much about what ordinarypeople think), where would you placeyourself?

2 v178 Waste of tax payers' money continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Do you think that those who governwaste a large part of the money we payin taxes, that they waste some of it, orthat they actually waste very little of thismoney?

3 v179 Competence of politicians continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Do you feel that most Norwegianpoliticians are competent people, whogenerally know what they are doing, ordo you believe that many of them lackknowledge of the issues they are set towork with?

4 v180 Trustworthy politicians continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Do you find most of our politicians tobe trustworthy, that they are trustworthy

Page 53: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Variables Group(s)

- 53 -

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

on the whole, or that few Norwegianpoliticians are trustworthy?

Group Evaluation of previous government

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

1 v106 How good or bad a job hasthe government done

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 The last four years we have had agovernment consisting og the LabourParty, the Socialist Left Party and theCenter Party. How good or bad a job doyou think it has done? Has it done a…

2 v165 Areas where the red - greengovernment has done a goodjob

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Is there a special area where you thinkthe red - green government has done agood job?

3 v166 Area 1 governm. did a goodjob

discrete character-200 1030 0 Is there a special area where you thinkthe red - green government has done agood job? ... A. Area 1

4 v167 Area 2 governm. did a goodjob

discrete character-200 546 0 Is there a special area where you thinkthe red - green government has done agood job? ... B. Area 2

5 v168 Area 3 governm. did a goodjob

discrete character-200 221 0 Is there a special area where you thinkthe red - green government has done agood job? ... C. Area 3

6 v169 Areas where the red - greengovernment has done a poorjob

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Is there a special area where you thinkthe red - green government has done apoor job?

7 v170 Area 1 governm. did a poorjob

discrete character-200 1099 0 Is there a special area where you thinkthe red - green government has done apoor job? ... A. Area 1

8 v171 Area 2 governm. did a poorjob

discrete character-200 658 0 Is there a special area where you thinkthe red - green government has done apoor job? ... B. Area 2

9 v172 Area 3 governm. did a poorjob

discrete character-200 306 0 Is there a special area where you thinkthe red - green government has done apoor job? ... C. Area 3

10 v175 The red - green governmenthas handled the crisis

continuous numeric-1.0 1731 51 As known, Norway too was hit by theglobal financial crisis the past year. Howdo you think the red - green governmenthas handled this crisis? Do you meanthat it has handled it very well, fairlywell, fairly bad or very bad?

Group Left-right scale

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

1 v123 Center party (SP) continuous numeric-2.0 1782 0 In politics people sometimes talk of leftand right. Where would you place thedifferent parties on a scale ranging from0 to 10 where 0 is the left side and 10 isthe right side? ... A. Center party (SP)

2 v124 Progress party (FRP) continuous numeric-2.0 1782 0 In politics people sometimes talk of leftand right. Where would you place thedifferent parties on a scale ranging from0 to 10 where 0 is the left side and 10is the right side? ... B. Progress party(FRP)

Page 54: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Variables Group(s)

- 54 -

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

3 v125 Liberal party (V) continuous numeric-2.0 1782 0 In politics people sometimes talk of leftand right. Where would you place thedifferent parties on a scale ranging from0 to 10 where 0 is the left side and 10 isthe right side? ... C. Liberal party (V)

4 v126 Labour party (DNA) continuous numeric-2.0 1782 0 In politics people sometimes talk ofleft and right. Where would you placethe different parties on a scale rangingfrom 0 to 10 where 0 is the left side and10 is the right side? ... D. Labour party(DNA)

5 v127 Conservative party (H) continuous numeric-2.0 1782 0 In politics people sometimes talk of leftand right. Where would you place thedifferent parties on a scale ranging from0 to 10 where 0 is the left side and 10 isthe right side? ... E. Conservative party(H)

6 v128 Christian people's party(KRF)

continuous numeric-2.0 1782 0 In politics people sometimes talk of leftand right. Where would you place thedifferent parties on a scale ranging from0 to 10 where 0 is the left side and 10 isthe right side? ... F. Christian people'sparty (KRF)

7 v129 Social left party (SV) continuous numeric-2.0 1782 0 In politics people sometimes talk of leftand right. Where would you place thedifferent parties on a scale ranging from0 to 10 where 0 is the left side and 10is the right side? ... G. Social left party(SV)

8 v130 Red/Red electoral alliance(RV)

continuous numeric-2.0 1782 0 In politics people sometimes talk of leftand right. Where would you place thedifferent parties on a scale ranging from0 to 10 where 0 is the left side and 10 isthe right side? ... H. Red/Red electoralalliance (RV)

9 v131 Self-placement on left-rightscale

continuous numeric-2.0 1782 0 Where would you place yourself on ascale from 0 to 10 where 0 means theleft and 10 means right?

Group Knowledge of politics

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

1 v042 Part of the governemnt: AP continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Do you happen to which partieshave been in government in the lastparliamentary term? ... A. The LaborParty

2 v043 Part of the governemnt: SV continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Do you happen to which partieshave been in government in the lastparliamentary term? ... B. The SocialLeft Party

3 v044 Part of the governemnt: SP continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Do you happen to which partieshave been in government in the lastparliamentary term? ... C. The CenterParty

4 v045 Part of the governemnt:Other answers

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Do you happen to which partieshave been in government in the lastparliamentary term? ... D. Other anwers

Page 55: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Variables Group(s)

- 55 -

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

5 v046 Controversial areas oil/gas:Lofoten

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 In recent years there has beendisagreement about the development ofnew fields of oil and gas exploration onthe Norwegian continental shelf. Canyou say the two areas that have beenparticularly controversial? ... A. Lofoten

6 v047 Controversial areas oil/gas:Vesterålen

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 In recent years there has beendisagreement about the developmentof new fields of oil and gas explorationon the Norwegian continental shelf.Can you say the two areas that havebeen particularly controversial? ... B.Vesterålen

7 v048 Controversial areas oil/gas:Other answers

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 In recent years there has beendisagreement about the development ofnew fields of oil and gas exploration onthe Norwegian continental shelf. Canyou say the two areas that have beenparticularly controversial? ... C. Andresvar

8 v049 Minister of Transport andCommunications: Liv SigneNavarsete

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Do you know who has been Minister ofTransport and Communications for thelast year before the election, and whichparty the concerned represent? ... A. LivSigne Navarsete

9 v050 Minister of Transport andCommunications: SP

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Do you know who has been Minister ofTransport and Communications for thelast year before the election, and whichparty the concerned represent? ... B. TheCenter Party

10 v051 Minister of Transport andCommunications: Otheranswers

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Do you know who has been Minister ofTransport and Communications for thelast year before the election, and whichparty the concerned represent? ... C.Other answers

11 v052 Opposed same-sex marriage:FrP

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Which two parties opposed the law thatallows marriage between two of thesame sex? ... A. The Progress Party

12 v053 Opposed same-sex marriage:Krf

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Which two parties opposed the law thatallows marriage between two of thesame sex? ... B. The Christian People'sparty

13 v054 Opposed same-sex marriage:Other answers

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Which two parties opposed the law thatallows marriage between two of thesame sex? ... C. Other answers

Group Economic situation

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

1 v173 Unemployed last four years continuous numeric-1.0 1675 107 Have you yourself or other membersof your household been unemployedduring the past for years?

2 v174 Fear of unemployment continuous numeric-1.0 1674 108 Have you yourself or other membersof your household been unemployedor experienced particular difficulty ingetting a job during the past for years?

3 v190 Household economy better orworse

continuous numeric-1.0 1764 18 We are interested in people's currenteconomic status. Would you say that

Page 56: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Variables Group(s)

- 56 -

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

you and your household's economy isbetter or worse than it was a year ago?

4 v191 Household economy: muchbetter or a bit better

continuous numeric-1.0 590 1192 Is it much better or a bit better?

5 v192 Household economy: muchworse or a bit worse

continuous numeric-1.0 198 1584 Is it much worse or a bit worse?

6 v193 Future personal economicsituation

continuous numeric-1.0 1759 23 Let's think ahead towards the years tocome. Do you think your economicsituation would be like today, better thantoday or do you think it would be worsethan today?

7 v194 The economic situation inNorway today

continuous numeric-1.0 1760 22 What do you think about the economicsituation in Norway today? Would yousay the economy is very good, good,neither good nor bad, bad or very bad?

8 v195 Economic situation last year continuous numeric-1.0 1744 38 Would you say that the economicsituation in the country has improvedthe last 12 months, is it almostunchanged or is it worse today?

9 v196 Ec. situation: much better ora bit better

continuous numeric-1.0 323 1459 Would you say much better or a bitbetter?

10 v197 Ec. situation: much worse ora bit worse

continuous numeric-1.0 362 1420 Would you say much worse or a bitworse?

Group Trust

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

1 v077 Trust in Local GovernmentCommittee

continuous numeric-2.0 1782 0 I would like to know how muchconfidence you have in certaininstitutions. After I have read the nameof an institution, could you place itin a rangig scale of 0 to 10, where 0means that you have no confidence atall and 10 means that you are extremelyconfident. ... A. Local GovernmentCommittee

2 v078 Trust in government continuous numeric-2.0 1782 0 I would like to know how muchconfidence you have in certaininstitutions. After I have read the nameof an institution, could you place itin a rangig scale of 0 to 10, where 0means that you have no confidence atall and 10 means that you are extremelyconfident. ... B. The government

3 v079 Trust in political parties continuous numeric-2.0 1782 0 I would like to know how muchconfidence you have in certaininstitutions. After I have read the nameof an institution, could you place itin a rangig scale of 0 to 10, where 0means that you have no confidence atall and 10 means that you are extremelyconfident. ... C. Political parties

4 v080 Trust in the Storting (nationalparliament)

continuous numeric-2.0 1782 0 I would like to know how muchconfidence you have in certaininstitutions. After I have read the nameof an institution, could you place itin a rangig scale of 0 to 10, where 0means that you have no confidence atall and 10 means that you are extremely

Page 57: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Variables Group(s)

- 57 -

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

confident. ... D. The Storting (nationalparliament)

5 v081 Trust in the courts continuous numeric-2.0 1782 0 I would like to know how muchconfidence you have in certaininstitutions. After I have read the nameof an institution, could you place itin a rangig scale of 0 to 10, where 0means that you have no confidence atall and 10 means that you are extremelyconfident. ... E. The courts

6 v082 Trust in politicians continuous numeric-2.0 1782 0 I would like to know how muchconfidence you have in certaininstitutions. After I have read the nameof an institution, could you place itin a rangig scale of 0 to 10, where 0means that you have no confidence atall and 10 means that you are extremelyconfident. ... F. Politicians

7 v083 Trust in media continuous numeric-2.0 1782 0 I would like to know how muchconfidence you have in certaininstitutions. After I have read the nameof an institution, could you place itin a rangig scale of 0 to 10, where 0means that you have no confidence atall and 10 means that you are extremelyconfident. ... G. The media

Group The election campaign

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

1 v132 The campaign helped toclarify the differencesbetween the parties

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 When you look back on the electioncampaign. To what extent do you thinkthis campaign helped to clarify thedifferences between the parties? Wouldyou say..

Group Organisation membership

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

1 v279 R. member of a union continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Are you a member of a union or a workorganisation?

2 v280 Primary union thisorganisation belongs to

continuous numeric-2.0 877 905 Which primary union does thisorganisation belong to?

3 v281 Bak19sps Spes avhovedsammenslutn for org.

discrete numeric-40.0 0 1782 Specify which other primary union thisorganisations belongs to.

4 v282 Active member of theorganisation

continuous numeric-1.0 877 905 Are you an active member of thisorganisation? By active member, I meanthat one participates in most of themeetings.

Group Language and teetotalism

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

1 v283 R's written form continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Which form of the Norwegian languagedo you prefer to use in your writing:"Bokmål" or "Nynorsk"?

Page 58: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Variables Group(s)

- 58 -

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

2 v284 Interested in the languageissue

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 How interested are you in the languageissue? Would you say you are...

3 v285 R abstainer continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Do you consider yourself a totalabstainer, or do you drink alcohol nowand then?

4 v286 Interest in the abstinenceissue

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 How interested are you in the abstinenceissue? Would you say that you are...

Group Religiosity

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

1 v287 R member of any religiousorganisation

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Are you a member of any religious orChristian association or organisation?

2 v288 Present at chuch services continuous numeric-2.0 1782 0 How many times during the past monthhave you ... A. Been present at chuchservices?

3 v289 Attended other religiousmeetings

continuous numeric-2.0 1782 0 How many times during the past monthhave you ... B. Attended other religiousmeetings?

4 v290 Listened to devotionals andchurch services on the radioor television

continuous numeric-2.0 1782 0 How many times during the past monthhave you ... C. Listened to devotionalsand church services on the radio ortelevision?

5 v291 Do you consider yourselfpersonally Christian

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Do you consider yourself personallyChristian?

Group Media use

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

1 v069 Nationwide and regionalnewspapers

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 You can get information about theelection in several different ways.How important would you say thatthe following sources of informationwas for you in this election. Wherewould you place your opinion on ascale ranging from 1 to 5, where 1means "not important" and 5 means"very important". ... A. Nationwide andregional newspapers (also web editions)

2 v070 Local newspapers continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 You can get information about theelection in several different ways.How important would you say thatthe following sources of informationwas for you in this election. Wherewould you place your opinion on a scaleranging from 1 to 5, where 1 means"not important" and 5 means "veryimportant". ... B. Local newspapers (alsoweb editions)

3 v071 Spm21c Tv continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 You can get information about theelection in several different ways.How important would you say thatthe following sources of informationwas for you in this election. Wherewould you place your opinion on a scaleranging from 1 to 5, where 1 means

Page 59: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Variables Group(s)

- 59 -

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

"not important" and 5 means "veryimportant". ... C. TV

4 v072 Spm21d Radio continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 You can get information about theelection in several different ways.How important would you say thatthe following sources of informationwas for you in this election. Wherewould you place your opinion on a scaleranging from 1 to 5, where 1 means"not important" and 5 means "veryimportant". ... D. Radio

5 v073 Internet (without onlinenewspapers)

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 You can get information about theelection in several different ways.How important would you say thatthe following sources of informationwas for you in this election. Wherewould you place your opinion on ascale ranging from 1 to 5, where 1means "not important" and 5 means"very important". ... E. Internet (withoutonline newspapers)

6 v074 Parties' campaign materials continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 You can get information about theelection in several different ways.How important would you say thatthe following sources of informationwas for you in this election. Wherewould you place your opinion on a scaleranging from 1 to 5, where 1 means"not important" and 5 means "veryimportant". ... F. Parties' campaignmaterials (leaflets, pamphlets, etc.)

7 v075 Discussions with family andfriends

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 You can get information about theelection in several different ways.How important would you say thatthe following sources of informationwas for you in this election. Wherewould you place your opinion on a scaleranging from 1 to 5, where 1 means"not important" and 5 means "veryimportant". ... G. Discussions withfamily and friends

8 v076 Importance of print edition oronline edition

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Is it primarily the newspapers printedversion that is most important to you,are the print edition and online editionas important, or is it the newspaper'sonline edition that is most importantto you personally when it comes toinformation about the election?

9 v133 Follow the media during theelection campaign

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 How well did you follow the mediaduring the election campaign? Verywell, fairly well, not well, or didn't youfollow it at all?

10 v137 Read on internet inconnection with the election

continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 How often did you read about theelection on the Internet in connectionwith the election campaign?

11 v138 Use of parties' home pages continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Regarding the election this year, did youacquire information from the parties'homepages on the internet?

12 v139 Red/Red Electoral Alliance continuous numeric-1.0 327 1455 Which party or parties' websites did youretrieve information from? ... A. RedElectoral Alliance

Page 60: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Variables Group(s)

- 60 -

# Name Label Type Format Valid Invalid Question

13 v140 Got info: SV continuous numeric-1.0 327 1455 Which party or parties' websites did youretrieve information from? ... B. SocialLeft Party

14 v141 Got info: DNA continuous numeric-1.0 327 1455 Which party or parties' websites did youretrieve information from? ... C. TheLabour Party

15 v142 Got info: V continuous numeric-1.0 327 1455 Which party or parties' websites did youretrieve information from? ... D. TheLiberal Party

16 v143 Got info: Krf continuous numeric-1.0 327 1455 Which party or parties' websites did youretrieve information from? ... E. TheChristian People's Party

17 v144 Got info: SP continuous numeric-1.0 327 1455 Which party or parties' websites did youretrieve information from? ... F. TheCenter Party

18 v145 Got info: H continuous numeric-1.0 327 1455 Which party or parties' websites did youretrieve information from? ... G. TheConservative Party

19 v146 Got info: Frp continuous numeric-1.0 327 1455 Which party or parties' websites did youretrieve information from? ... H. TheProgress Party

20 v147 Got info: Other parties continuous numeric-1.0 327 1455 Which party or parties' websites did youretrieve information from? ... I. Otherparties

21 v148 Visited politicians' websites continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 Have you in connection with theelection this year, visited somepoliticians' websites, such as facebookor twitter?

22 v149 Web pages of party leadersor other politicians

continuous numeric-1.0 139 1643 Was this mainly web pages of partyleaders, or was it mainly otherpoliticians?

23 v150 Political advertising allowed continuous numeric-1.0 1782 0 There has been some discussion aboutwether political advertising on televisionshould be allowed or not. What is youropinion on this question?

24 v151 Specify other politicaladvertising

discrete character-60 36 0 Specify other political advertising

Group Technical variables

Page 61: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

Election Survey 2009 - Variables Description

- 61 -

Variables DescriptionDataset contains 293 variable(s)

Page 62: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 62 -

File : NSD1487# v001: R's age at the time of interview

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 17-79] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question R's age at the time of interview

# v002: R's age group, time of interview

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question R's age group, time of interview

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 17-24 years 201 11.3%

2 25-44 years 609 34.2%

3 45-66 years 754 42.3%

4 67-79 years 218 12.2%

5 80- år 0

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 0Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v003: R's gender

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question R's gender

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Man 929 52.1%

2 Woman 853 47.9%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 0Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v004: Political interest

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Let us begin with a question dealing with political interest. Would you say that you are …

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 very interested in politics 177 9.9%

2 fairly interested 1021 57.3%

3 only slightly interested 523 29.3%

4 not interested at all? 61 3.4%

8 won't answer 0

9 don't know 0Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v005: How often talked about the election

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Page 63: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 63 -

File : NSD1487# v005: How often talked about the election

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question We would like to hear whether you have participated in political discussions or talks before the election this year. How oftendid you talk about the election in the family or with friends and acquaintances. Would you say about ...

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 daily 422 23.7%

2 a couple of times a week 814 45.7%

3 more rarely 400 22.4%

4 or never 145 8.1%

8 won't answer 1 0.1%

9 Don't know 0Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v006: Cared about which party or parties won or lost the election

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Looking back on the election this fall, would you say that you personally cared a great deal about which party or parties wonor lost the election, did you care to some degree, or didn't it matter to you personally?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Cared a great deal 795 44.6%

2 Cared to some degree 761 42.7%

3 It didn’t matter 225 12.6%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 1 0.1%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v007: 1. issue important for voting

Information [Type= discrete] [Format=character] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1760 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Can you name one or two issues which had particular influence on the way you voted?

... A. Issue 1

Interviewer's instructions If R. only mention one issue, ask if there are more issues that are important. We will later return to why R. did not vote

Value Label Cases Percentage

"MAtpakkesaken" 1 0.1%

(8) nekter/vilikke svare

14 0.8%

(9) vet ikke 189 10.7%

0 2 0.1%

2 4 0.2%

999 1 0.1%

ARBEIDSLINJEN 1 0.1%

Abortsaken 2 0.1%

Alderspensjon 1 0.1%

Arbeid 2 0.1%

Page 64: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 64 -

File : NSD1487# v007: 1. issue important for voting

Value Label Cases Percentage

Arbeid forungdom

1 0.1%

Arbeidsledighet 1 0.1%

Arbeidstid(fryktet lengredager)

1 0.1%

Arbeidsvilkår 1 0.1%

Assylpolitikk 1 0.1%

Asylpolitikk 3 0.2%

Asylpolitikken 1 0.1%

At jeg selv bleansett som viktig

1 0.1%

Avgifter 3 0.2%

Avkristning avlandet

1 0.1%

BARNEHAGEPOLITIKK 1 0.1%

Barnefamiliepolitikk

1 0.1%

Barne og familie 1 0.1%

Barnehage 1 0.1%

Barnehagedekning 1 0.1%

BarnehagestøtteSkattefordeler

1 0.1%

Barnsoppvekstmiljø

1 0.1%

Beholderegjeringen

1 0.1%

Beholderødgrønne

1 0.1%

Bekjentskap tilnoen politikkere

1 0.1%

Bevaring avnasjonal egenart

1 0.1%

Bevilgningtil statligmyndigheter

1 0.1%

Bilavgifter 1 0.1%

DISTRIKSPOLITIKK 1 0.1%

DISTRIKTSPOLITIKK 1 0.1%

Den nyeekteskapslovenog følgene avdet

1 0.1%

Distriksplitikken 1 0.1%

Distrikspolitikk 1 0.1%

Distrikt 1 0.1%

Distriktspolitikk 1 0.1%

Distriktspolitikken 1 0.1%

Page 65: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 65 -

File : NSD1487# v007: 1. issue important for voting

Value Label Cases Percentage

ELDREOMSORG 2 0.1%

EU 3 0.2%

EU saken 1 0.1%

EU-saken 1 0.1%

EU-spørsmålet 1 0.1%

EUsaken 1 0.1%

Eldre 4 0.2%

Eldreomsor 1 0.1%

Eldreomsorg 18 1.0%

Eldreomsorg/sykehjemsplasser

1 0.1%

Eldreomsorgen 3 0.2%

Eldrepolitikk 1 0.1%

Eldrepolitikken 1 0.1%

Eldres levekår iNorge

1 0.1%

En regjeringsom harhandlekraft

1 0.1%

Eu-spørsmålet 1 0.1%

FATTIGDOM-UHJELP

1 0.1%

FINANSPOLITIKK 1 0.1%

FLYKTNINGEPOLITIKKEN 1 0.1%

FORDELINGMEST MULIGLIKT YILALLE BORGE

1 0.1%

Familiepolitikk 2 0.1%

Familiepolitikken 1 0.1%

Familiepolitkk 1 0.1%

Fellesskapet 1 0.1%

Finanskrisen 1 0.1%

Finnmarksloven 1 0.1%

Flyktningpolitikken 1 0.1%

Flyplassen rygge 1 0.1%

For myekrangling

1 0.1%

Forandring 1 0.1%

Fordeling avgodene

1 0.1%

Fordelingvelferd

1 0.1%

Fordelingspolitikk 2 0.1%

Forholdet tilIsrael

1 0.1%

Page 66: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 66 -

File : NSD1487# v007: 1. issue important for voting

Value Label Cases Percentage

Forksning 1 0.1%

Formueskatt 2 0.1%

Forskning 1 0.1%

Forsvar 1 0.1%

Framleisraud-grønregjering

1 0.1%

Framtida 1 0.1%

Få tilregjeringsskifte

1 0.1%

Få ut MullaKrekar/innvandringspolitikke

1 0.1%

HELSEPOLITIKK 2 0.1%

HELSEPOLITIKKGENERELT

1 0.1%

HOLDE FRPUTENFORREGJERING

1 0.1%

Helse 18 1.0%

Helse miljø 1 0.1%

Helse og omsorg 1 0.1%

Helse omsorg 1 0.1%

Helse sosoial 1 0.1%

Helsepolitikk 8 0.5%

Helsepolitikk;sykehusenesøkonomi

1 0.1%

Helsespoørsmål 1 0.1%

Helsevesenet 2 0.1%

Hjelp til funksjonshemmendehjemme

1 0.1%

Holdevelferdsstatenoppe

1 0.1%

Hva staten skalgjøre

1 0.1%

INNVANDRERPOLITIKKEN 1 0.1%

INNVANDRIGSPOLITIKK 1 0.1%

INVANDRING 1 0.1%

Ikke Frp 1 0.1%

Industris kår 1 0.1%

Ingen 1 0.1%

Ingen sak viktig 1 0.1%

Ingen saker 1 0.1%

Innvandrer 1 0.1%

Innvandrerpolitikken 1 0.1%

Page 67: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 67 -

File : NSD1487# v007: 1. issue important for voting

Value Label Cases Percentage

Innvandring 22 1.2%

Innvandringpolitikken 1 0.1%

Innvandringspolitikk

1 0.1%

Innvandringspolitikk 2 0.1%

Innvandringspolitikken 4 0.2%

Innvasjon,nyskapning

1 0.1%

Integrering 1 0.1%

Intet 1 0.1%

Invandrerproblematikk 1 0.1%

Invandring 1 0.1%

Ios ideologi 1 0.1%

Jordbruk 1 0.1%

Jordbruket 1 0.1%

Klassenivå 1 0.1%

Klima 1 0.1%

Klima - Globalt 1 0.1%

Kommuneøkonomi 1 0.1%

Kontantstøtte 1 0.1%

Kontantstøtten 1 0.1%

Krim omsorg 1 0.1%

Kriminalsaken 1 0.1%

Kristendom 1 0.1%

Kristendomsspørsmål 1 0.1%

Kulturpolitikk 2 0.1%

Kulturspørsmål 1 0.1%

LIKELØNNSPROBLEMATIKK 1 0.1%

Landbruk 1 0.1%

Landbrukets rammebetingelser 1 0.1%

Landbrukspolitikk 5 0.3%

Lave renter 1 0.1%

Likelønn 1 0.1%

MILJØ 2 0.1%

MILJØPOLITIKKEN 2 0.1%

MILJØSPØRSMÅL 1 0.1%

MOT oljeboringi nord

1 0.1%

Mijø 1 0.1%

Miljø 32 1.8%

Miljø - naturen 1 0.1%

Miljøpolitikk 1 0.1%

Miljøsaken 1 0.1%

Page 68: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 68 -

File : NSD1487# v007: 1. issue important for voting

Value Label Cases Percentage

Miljøspørsmål 1 0.1%

Miljøvern 6 0.3%

Miljøvern,biodiesel

1 0.1%

Mot FRP 1 0.1%

Nei men onkelenmin var med

1 0.1%

Nei tiloljeboring

1 0.1%

Norge ut avAfgahnistan

1 0.1%

Næring 1 0.1%

Næringslivspolitikk 1 0.1%

Næringspolitikk 5 0.3%

Næringspolitikken 1 0.1%

Offentlig sektor 1 0.1%

Olje i Nord 1 0.1%

Olje i nord 1 0.1%

Oljeboring iLofoten

1 0.1%

Oljeborring 1 0.1%

Oljeleting iLofoten

1 0.1%

Oljeutvinning 1 0.1%

Oljeutvinning iLoften

1 0.1%

Oljeutvinning inord

1 0.1%

Opprettholdelseav sykelønnsordning

1 0.1%

PENSJONSREFORMEN 1 0.1%

Pansjonistsaker 1 0.1%

Pengebruk i off.sektor

1 0.1%

Pensjon 3 0.2%

Pensjoner 2 0.1%

Pensjonsordning 1 0.1%

Pensjonsspørsmål 1 0.1%

Prisnivå 1 0.1%

REGJERINGSSPØRSMÅLET 1 0.1%

Regjering 1 0.1%

Regjeringskabalen 1 0.1%

Regjeringskonstellasjon 1 0.1%

Regjeringsskifte 1 0.1%

Regjeringsvalg 1 0.1%

Page 69: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 69 -

File : NSD1487# v007: 1. issue important for voting

Value Label Cases Percentage

Rettferdighet 1 0.1%

Rovdyrpolitikk 2 0.1%

Rovdyrpolitikken 2 0.1%

Rovviltproblematikken 1 0.1%

SAMFERDSEL 2 0.1%

SAMFERDSELSPOLITIKK 1 0.1%

SKATTE ogavgift

1 0.1%

SKATTEPOLITIKK 1 0.1%

SKOLE 1 0.1%

SKOLE OGOMSORG

1 0.1%

SKOLEPOLITIKK 3 0.2%

SKOLEPOLITIKKEN 1 0.1%

STYRKEPOLITIET

1 0.1%

Samferdsel 9 0.5%

Skatt 5 0.3%

Skatt og avgift 1 0.1%

Skatt og avgifter 1 0.1%

Skattelette 1 0.1%

Skattepolitikk 8 0.5%

Skatter 1 0.1%

Skatter ogavgifter

3 0.2%

Skattespørsmål 1 0.1%

Skol 1 0.1%

Skole 31 1.8%

Skole ogbarnehagepolitikk

1 0.1%

Skole ogundervisning

1 0.1%

Skole ogutdanning

2 0.1%

Skole utdanning 1 0.1%

Skole, utdanningog barnehage

1 0.1%

Skole/utdanning 2 0.1%

Skole\oppvekst 1 0.1%

Skolepolitikk 7 0.4%

Skolepolitikken 2 0.1%

Solidaritet 1 0.1%

Sosialbudsjettet 1 0.1%

Sosialpolitikk 2 0.1%

Page 70: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 70 -

File : NSD1487# v007: 1. issue important for voting

Value Label Cases Percentage

Statskirken 1 0.1%

Statsministeren 1 0.1%

Stemte ikke 1 0.1%

Stipend 1 0.1%

Studentlån 1 0.1%

Studentpolitikk 1 0.1%

Sykehjemsplasser 1 0.1%

Sykehus 1 0.1%

Sysselsetting 1 0.1%

Toppskatt 1 0.1%

UTDANNINGSPOLITIKK 2 0.1%

UTDANNINGSPOLITIKKEN 1 0.1%

Ungdomspolitikk 1 0.1%

Unngåhøyresiden

1 0.1%

Utdanning 7 0.4%

Utdanning, skole 1 0.1%

Utdannings/skolepolitikk

1 0.1%

Utdanningspolitikken 1 0.1%

Utenriks 1 0.1%

VEIER 1 0.1%

VIL IKKE HAfrp

1 0.1%

Valgfrihet 1 0.1%

Vegar og ferje 1 0.1%

Vegbygging 1 0.1%

Vei 3 0.2%

Veier 1 0.1%

Veier/Samferdsel

1 0.1%

Veipolitikk 1 0.1%

Veiutbygging 2 0.1%

Velferd 2 0.1%

Velferdpolitikk 1 0.1%

Vet hva jeg harikke hva jeg får

1 0.1%

abort 1 0.1%

abortsaken 1 0.1%

afghanistan 1 0.1%

afp 2 0.1%

aktiv dødshjelp,opprettholdeekteskapsl

1 0.1%

Page 71: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 71 -

File : NSD1487# v007: 1. issue important for voting

Value Label Cases Percentage

alle i arbeid 1 0.1%

alle skal få deltai godene

1 0.1%

ansvarligpolitikk

1 0.1%

arbei til alle 1 0.1%

arbeid 2 0.1%

arbeid for alle 1 0.1%

arbeid for alle 2 0.1%

arbeid og velferd 1 0.1%

arbeid til alle 1 0.1%

arbeidsledigheit/+ pensjon)

1 0.1%

arbeidsledighet 3 0.2%

arbeidslivet 1 0.1%

arbeidsmarked 2 0.1%

arbeidsmarkedet,arbeidsmilj

1 0.1%

arbeidsmiljølov 1 0.1%

arbeidsplasser 1 0.1%

arbeidsrettigheter,arbeidstaker

1 0.1%

arbeidstageresrettigheter

1 0.1%

arveavgift 2 0.1%

arvegift 1 0.1%

asfalttering avveier

1 0.1%

asyhpolitikk 1 0.1%

asyl og innvandringspolitikken 1 0.1%

asylpoletikken 1 0.1%

asylpolitikk 5 0.3%

asylpolitikken 7 0.4%

at ektep får redpensj i forh tilenslig

1 0.1%

at siv jensenikke blestatsminister

1 0.1%

avgift på engangsemballasje 1 0.1%

avgifter 2 0.1%

avgifter,reduksjon

1 0.1%

avgiftspolitikken 1 0.1%

avkristningen avNorge

1 0.1%

Page 72: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 72 -

File : NSD1487# v007: 1. issue important for voting

Value Label Cases Percentage

barn 2 0.1%

barn - barnehage 1 0.1%

barn og unge 2 0.1%

barne -familiepolitikk

1 0.1%

barne /likestilling

1 0.1%

barne-ungdomspolitikk

1 0.1%

barnefam 1 0.1%

barnehage 4 0.2%

barnehage, skole 1 0.1%

barnehagedekningi lokalmiljøet

1 0.1%

barnehave skole 1 0.1%

bedrehovedveier

1 0.1%

bedre næringsliv 1 0.1%

bedre veier 1 0.1%

bedriftenesvilkår

1 0.1%

beholde/opprettholdebefolkning ibygda

1 0.1%

beholde sammeregjeringen, pga.økonomie

1 0.1%

beholdesoldatene iAfganisan

1 0.1%

beskatning avbedrifter

1 0.1%

betre skuletilbod 1 0.1%

bevare det somdet er

1 0.1%

bevarevelferdsstaten

1 0.1%

bilo, økonomi,skatter

1 0.1%

bomstasjon 1 0.1%

boplikt 1 0.1%

borgerligregjering

1 0.1%

boring i Lofoten 1 0.1%

bosettning idistriktene

1 0.1%

det etiske 1 0.1%

Page 73: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 73 -

File : NSD1487# v007: 1. issue important for voting

Value Label Cases Percentage

distrikspolitikk 3 0.2%

distrikspolitkken 1 0.1%

distriktpoitkk 1 0.1%

distriktspolitikk 10 0.6%

distriktsprofil 1 0.1%

distrktspoiltikken 1 0.1%

driktstriktpolitikk

1 0.1%

dyrevern 1 0.1%

dyrt tobakk-skjule røyk

1 0.1%

dårlig standardpå veiene

1 0.1%

dødshjelp (motdødshjelp)

1 0.1%

eiendomsskatt 4 0.2%

eigedomsbeskatnig

1 0.1%

ekteskapslova 1 0.1%

ekteskapsloven 3 0.2%

ekteskapsvern 1 0.1%

eldre 3 0.2%

eldre ogsykeomsorg

1 0.1%

eldre saken 1 0.1%

eldrebølgen 1 0.1%

eldreomsorg 39 2.2%

eldreomsorg ogpleie

1 0.1%

eldreomsorg-pensjonrettigheter

1 0.1%

eldreomsorgen 24 1.4%

eldreomsorgen,skole ogutdanning

1 0.1%

eldreomsorgen/helsevesenet

1 0.1%

eldreomsorgpolitikken 1 0.1%

eldrepolitikk 8 0.5%

eldrepolitikken 4 0.2%

eldrepolitikken,pensjoner

1 0.1%

eldres kår 1 0.1%

eldreskår,fattigdom

1 0.1%

eldresaken 6 0.3%

Page 74: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 74 -

File : NSD1487# v007: 1. issue important for voting

Value Label Cases Percentage

endring irevisjon forfirma

1 0.1%

engangsavgiftflasker

1 0.1%

erfaring 1 0.1%

eu 4 0.2%

eu saken 1 0.1%

fam politikk 1 0.1%

familie 1 0.1%

familie politikk 1 0.1%

familiepoliatikk 1 0.1%

familiepolitikk 12 0.7%

familiepolitikk/barselspermisjoner

1 0.1%

fattidomsbekjempelse 1 0.1%

fattigdom 1 0.1%

fellesskap 1 0.1%

fellesskap vsprivatisering

1 0.1%

fellesskapsinteresser

1 0.1%

fellesskapstanken 1 0.1%

finanskrisa 1 0.1%

finanskrise 1 0.1%

finanskrisen 6 0.3%

finanspolitikken 1 0.1%

finaspolitikk 1 0.1%

flertallregjering 1 0.1%

flykningepolitikken

1 0.1%

flyktning 1 0.1%

forandring 1 0.1%

fordelingspolitik 1 0.1%

fordelingspolitikk 5 0.3%

fordelingspolitikken 1 0.1%

forhold mellomprivat og offsektor

1 0.1%

forhold til helse 1 0.1%

formuebeskatning 1 0.1%

formueskatt 4 0.2%

formueskatten 1 0.1%

formuesskatt/arveavgift

1 0.1%

Page 75: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 75 -

File : NSD1487# v007: 1. issue important for voting

Value Label Cases Percentage

fornybare energi 1 0.1%

forskning ogutdanning

1 0.1%

forssvarpolitikken 1 0.1%

forsvaret 1 0.1%

forutsigbarhet 1 0.1%

fremskritspartietikke inn iregjering

1 0.1%

fremtiden 1 0.1%

fritt skole valg 1 0.1%

få folk i arbeid 1 0.1%

få gjort noe medkriminaliteten

1 0.1%

få politisk skifte 1 0.1%

få vekkbommer/avgift

1 0.1%

gen poliitiskgrunntanke

1 0.1%

god økonomiskstyring

1 0.1%

gode kristnegrunnverdier

1 0.1%

godetrygdesystemer

1 0.1%

grunnlegemeneskeligtverdisyn-kristlig

1 0.1%

grunnsyn 1 0.1%

grunnverdier,familiesolidaritet

1 0.1%

halde påkristendsund. igrunnskolen

1 0.1%

helhet 1 0.1%

helheten 2 0.1%

helse 38 2.2%

helse -eldreomsorg

1 0.1%

helse ogaldersproblem

1 0.1%

helse ogeldreomsorg

3 0.2%

helse og omsorg 4 0.2%

helse og sososial 1 0.1%

helse omsorg 1 0.1%

Page 76: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 76 -

File : NSD1487# v007: 1. issue important for voting

Value Label Cases Percentage

helse, skole,eldre

1 0.1%

helse/omsorg 2 0.1%

helseomsorgen 1 0.1%

helsepolitikk 3 0.2%

helsepolitikken 5 0.3%

helsesaken 1 0.1%

helsesektoren 1 0.1%

helsevesen 2 0.1%

helsevesenet 2 0.1%

helsopolikikk 1 0.1%

hjelp til eldre(få sykehjempl)eldreoms

1 0.1%

holdninger tilinnvandrere

1 0.1%

homofilesrettigheter

1 0.1%

hurtigtog 1 0.1%

hvem som blirstatsminister,

1 0.1%

håpe påkontulitet . skole/ helse

1 0.1%

høyereutdanning

1 0.1%

ikke oljeboringi nord

1 0.1%

ikkeprivatisering

1 0.1%

ikkje nokon ting 1 0.1%

industri 2 0.1%

infrastruktur 1 0.1%

ingen bestemtesaker

1 0.1%

inndustriutvikling 1 0.1%

innskjæringhelsesektor-

1 0.1%

innvandingspolitikk 1 0.1%

innvandrer 1 0.1%

innvandrerdebatten 1 0.1%

innvandrerkriminalitet 1 0.1%

innvandrerpolitikk 3 0.2%

innvandrerpolitikken 1 0.1%

innvandrerspørsmål 1 0.1%

innvandring 30 1.7%

Page 77: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 77 -

File : NSD1487# v007: 1. issue important for voting

Value Label Cases Percentage

innvandringstrengere krav

1 0.1%

innvandring uteav kontroll

1 0.1%

innvandring-inntregneringspolitikken

1 0.1%

innvandringpolitikk 1 0.1%

innvandringspolitikk

1 0.1%

innvandringspol 1 0.1%

innvandringspolitikk 16 0.9%

innvandringspolitikken 11 0.6%

innvandringsspørsmålet 1 0.1%

innvandrringspolitt 1 0.1%

innvendring 1 0.1%

integreringspolitikk 1 0.1%

integreringspolitikken 1 0.1%

intergrasjons 1 0.1%

intet 1 0.1%

intregeringspolitikk 1 0.1%

invadring 1 0.1%

invandrepol 1 0.1%

invandrerpoltikk

1 0.1%

invandrere 1 0.1%

invandrings pol 1 0.1%

invandringspolitikk 3 0.2%

invandringspolitikken 2 0.1%

io ville beholdeden regjeringenvi hadd

1 0.1%

israelspolitikk 1 0.1%

jordbrukspolitikk 1 0.1%

jordbrukspolitikken 1 0.1%

jus 1 0.1%

kamp motfattigdom

1 0.1%

kirke-stat 1 0.1%

klarte oss godtgj.finanskrisen

1 0.1%

klima 3 0.2%

klima energi 1 0.1%

klimasaken 1 0.1%

klimaspørsmålet 1 0.1%

kolepolitikk 1 0.1%

Page 78: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 78 -

File : NSD1487# v007: 1. issue important for voting

Value Label Cases Percentage

kollektivtransport

1 0.1%

kollektivtrafikk 1 0.1%

kommuneøkonomi 1 0.1%

kommunikasjonog transport

1 0.1%

konflikt ijustisdepatement

1 0.1%

kontantstøtte 1 0.1%

kontantstøtten/familiepolitikk

1 0.1%

kontinuitet 1 0.1%

kraftrettigheter 1 0.1%

krigen iAfghanistan

1 0.1%

kriminal politik 1 0.1%

kriminalitet 1 0.1%

kriminalomsorg 1 0.1%

kriminalpolitikk 3 0.2%

kriminalpolitikken 1 0.1%

kristenfomålsparagraf

1 0.1%

kristene verdier 1 0.1%

krminaliteten 1 0.1%

kultur 4 0.2%

kulturpolitikk 1 0.1%

kutlurpolitikken,se vedlegg

1 0.1%

landbruk 3 0.2%

landbruket 2 0.1%

landbruks 1 0.1%

landbrukspolitikk 6 0.3%

lavere skatt 1 0.1%

lavere skatter ogavgifter

1 0.1%

levevikkårbedreifte

1 0.1%

like rettighetertil alle uansettbakrun

1 0.1%

likelønn 1 0.1%

likestilling oglønn

1 0.1%

livssyn 1 0.1%

lofoten 1 0.1%

1 0.1%

Page 79: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 79 -

File : NSD1487# v007: 1. issue important for voting

Value Label Cases Percentage

lofotenvesterålen

lofoten-vesterålen

1 0.1%

lånekassen 1 0.1%

makorøkonomiog nasjonalvlag

1 0.1%

mer liberaltsamfunn

1 0.1%

mer likhet isamfunnet

1 0.1%

mer penge tilskole

1 0.1%

mere friskoler 1 0.1%

miljø 72 4.1%

miljø helse 1 0.1%

miljø oginnvandring

1 0.1%

miljøoljeutbygging

1 0.1%

miljø, klima 1 0.1%

miljø,luftkraftlinjer

1 0.1%

miljø/miljøværn 1 0.1%

miljøpolitikk 2 0.1%

miljøpolitikken 2 0.1%

miljøsaken 2 0.1%

miljøspørsmål 3 0.2%

miljøvern 9 0.5%

mindrebompenger

1 0.1%

minstepenslonsatsen 1 0.1%

motkonstantstøtten

1 0.1%

motkontantstøtte

1 0.1%

nei spiller ingenrolle

1 0.1%

nettolønsord forsjøfolk

1 0.1%

norgesenergifremtid

1 0.1%

nyeekteskapslova

1 0.1%

næringsliv 4 0.2%

næringsplitikk 1 0.1%

næringspol 1 0.1%

Page 80: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 80 -

File : NSD1487# v007: 1. issue important for voting

Value Label Cases Percentage

næringspolitikk 3 0.2%

næringsvirksomhet 1 0.1%

o 1 0.1%

obligatoriskkristendom

1 0.1%

offentlighelsevesen

1 0.1%

offfentlig sektor 1 0.1%

okonomi 1 0.1%

olje Lofoten/Vesterålen

1 0.1%

oljebooringi Lofoten,invandring

1 0.1%

oljeboring 2 0.1%

oljeboring iLofoten

1 0.1%

oljeboring iLofoten ogVesterålen

1 0.1%

oljeboring iLofoten/Vesterålen

1 0.1%

oljeboring ilofoten

1 0.1%

oljeboring i nord 1 0.1%

oljeboringlofoten/vesterålen

1 0.1%

oljeborining iLofoten/Vesterålen

1 0.1%

oljeborring 1 0.1%

oljeborring inord, klimamiljø

1 0.1%

oljeborringutenfor lofoten/vesterålen/s

1 0.1%

oljefond-brukenav denne

1 0.1%

oljefonnet 1 0.1%

oljeleiting 1 0.1%

oljeleting 1 0.1%

oljeoyvinning 1 0.1%

oljeutbygging 1 0.1%

oljeutvinning 3 0.2%

oljeutvinning-aldersomsorg

1 0.1%

Page 81: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 81 -

File : NSD1487# v007: 1. issue important for voting

Value Label Cases Percentage

oljeutvinning inord lofoten

1 0.1%

oljeutvinninglofotenvesterålen

1 0.1%

olsefondet ogbruk av det

1 0.1%

omsorg 1 0.1%

omsorg eldre 1 0.1%

opphevelse avrev.plikt småselsk

1 0.1%

oppretthodlelseav velferdsstaten

1 0.1%

overføringbevilgningerkommuner

1 0.1%

partitilhørighet 1 0.1%

pengesløsing 1 0.1%

pensjon 3 0.2%

pensjon,egenopptjenterettigheter

1 0.1%

pensjonen 1 0.1%

pensjoner 2 0.1%

personlig frihet 1 0.1%

personligvalgfrihet

1 0.1%

politi trygghet 1 0.1%

politiressurser 1 0.1%

politiskinnvandring

1 0.1%

postdirektivet 1 0.1%

privatisering 8 0.5%

privatisering avhelsevesen

1 0.1%

privatisering avhelsevesenet

1 0.1%

privatiseringsspm/offentlig/privattjene

1 0.1%

prøveborineni Lofoten/Vesterålen

1 0.1%

redusereveiavgifter/fjernebompenger

1 0.1%

regjeringenssammensetning

1 0.1%

Page 82: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 82 -

File : NSD1487# v007: 1. issue important for voting

Value Label Cases Percentage

regjeringsalternativene 1 0.1%

regjeringsalternativer 1 0.1%

regjeringskabalen 1 0.1%

regjeringsmakt 1 0.1%

regjeringspørsmålet 1 0.1%

regjeringssamansetjinga 1 0.1%

regjeringsspm. 1 0.1%

regjeringsspørsmålet 3 0.2%

regjeringsspørsmålet,sammensetning

1 0.1%

rengjering sammensetningen 1 0.1%

revisjonsplikten 1 0.1%

rovdyrpolitikken 1 0.1%

rus, invandring 1 0.1%

rusomsorg 1 0.1%

rød-grontregjering

1 0.1%

sametinget 1 0.1%

samferdsel 17 1.0%

samferdsel/vei 1 0.1%

samferdselspolitikk 1 0.1%

samferdsle 1 0.1%

samferdsler 1 0.1%

samferdslesaker 1 0.1%

samfunn 1 0.1%

samfunnsutviklingen 1 0.1%

sammensetningav regjeringen

1 0.1%

satsing på kultur 1 0.1%

scooterdebatten 1 0.1%

senking avskatter

1 0.1%

sikrearbeidsplasserprivate bedrifter

1 0.1%

singelpolitikken 1 0.1%

sjøsame ogfastboendesamer

1 0.1%

skatt 29 1.6%

skatt avnæringsdrivende

1 0.1%

skatt og avgift 3 0.2%

skatt på bolig 1 0.1%

2 0.1%

Page 83: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 83 -

File : NSD1487# v007: 1. issue important for voting

Value Label Cases Percentage

skatte ogavgiftspolitikken

skatte politik 1 0.1%

skattelegging,eiendomsskatt

1 0.1%

skatten 1 0.1%

skattepolitikk 16 0.9%

skattepolitikken 4 0.2%

skattepolitil 1 0.1%

skatter 1 0.1%

skatter ogavgifter

4 0.2%

skattereduksjon, 1 0.1%

skattesaker 1 0.1%

skattpolitikk 1 0.1%

skifte av politikk 1 0.1%

skole 73 4.1%

skole ogfamiliepolitikk

1 0.1%

skole ogutanning

1 0.1%

skole ogutdanning

6 0.3%

skole utdanning 1 0.1%

skole' 1 0.1%

skole, 1 0.1%

skole-og barnehagedekning 1 0.1%

skole-utdanning 1 0.1%

skole/utdanning 1 0.1%

skolepolitikk 23 1.3%

skolepolitikk,satse mer, læremer

1 0.1%

skolepolitikk/utdanning

1 0.1%

skolepolitikken 3 0.2%

skolepoltikk 1 0.1%

skolesaken 1 0.1%

skolesaker 1 0.1%

skolespørsmål 1 0.1%

skule 2 0.1%

skule + utdaning 1 0.1%

skule stipend 1 0.1%

sosial politikk 1 0.1%

sosial stabilitet 1 0.1%

Page 84: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 84 -

File : NSD1487# v007: 1. issue important for voting

Value Label Cases Percentage

sosialdemokrati 1 0.1%

sosialdemokratiet 1 0.1%

sosialelikefordeligav goder isamfunne

1 0.1%

sosiale-trygd 1 0.1%

sosialistiskepartier det destår for

1 0.1%

sosialpolitikk 2 0.1%

sosialpolitiske 1 0.1%

sosialt fellesskap 1 0.1%

stabile renter 1 0.1%

stabilitet 1 0.1%

stabilitet iarbeidslivet

1 0.1%

stabilitet iftpolitikk

1 0.1%

statlig kontrollmed kraftverk

1 0.1%

statskirken,kristendom

1 0.1%

statsminister 1 0.1%

stemt slik atFRP ikke komtil makta

1 0.1%

stipendordning 1 0.1%

strandsoneproblematikken 1 0.1%

studentenesvilkår

1 0.1%

styrke forsvaret,ikkje oljeleitingi Lo

1 0.1%

støtte tilnæringsliv

1 0.1%

støtteordning forstudenter

1 0.1%

sykefravær 1 0.1%

sykehjemplasser-mer penger tilsykehus

1 0.1%

sykehjemsplassfor alle

1 0.1%

sykehus 1 0.1%

sykehusordninger 1 0.1%

sykehuspolitikken 1 0.1%

sysselsetting 2 0.1%

Page 85: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 85 -

File : NSD1487# v007: 1. issue important for voting

Value Label Cases Percentage

sysselsettingen 1 0.1%

tariffavtaler formusikere

1 0.1%

toppskatt 1 0.1%

trygd ut iarbeidslivet

1 0.1%

trygde ogskattepolitikk

1 0.1%

trygder 1 0.1%

trygderpensjoner

1 0.1%

trygghet 1 0.1%

tære oljefondet 1 0.1%

uførhet 1 0.1%

ungdomslinjen 1 0.1%

utbygginglofoten

1 0.1%

utdannelse 1 0.1%

utdanning 15 0.9%

utdanning avlærere

1 0.1%

utdanning ogmiljø

1 0.1%

utdanning ogskole

1 0.1%

utdanningspolitikken 1 0.1%

utfall avstemmegivning

1 0.1%

utlendingspolitikken 1 0.1%

valgfrihet 1 0.1%

vannkrafta, 1 0.1%

vegsamband 1 0.1%

vei 1 0.1%

vei -jernbane 1 0.1%

veiane våre,ferjefritt

1 0.1%

veier 2 0.1%

veier-kommunikasjon

1 0.1%

veier ogtransport

1 0.1%

veipolitikk 1 0.1%

veistandarden 1 0.1%

veiutbygging 3 0.2%

velferd 3 0.2%

velferdsordninger 1 0.1%

Page 86: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 86 -

File : NSD1487# v007: 1. issue important for voting

Value Label Cases Percentage

velferdsstaten 1 0.1%

velferdstaten 1 0.1%

velstandstat 1 0.1%

verdi 1 0.1%

verdi skapning 1 0.1%

verdier 1 0.1%

verdispørsamål 1 0.1%

verdispørsmål 2 0.1%

verdivalg 1 0.1%

vil ha etsosiallistisksamfunn

1 0.1%

vil havenstrepol.

1 0.1%

vilke partier somkom i regjering

1 0.1%

ville gjerne atmitt parti skullevinne

1 0.1%

ville prøve etannet parti

1 0.1%

ville ungåsamarbeid medFrp.

1 0.1%

vold ogkriminalitet

1 0.1%

xxxx 1 0.1%

Økonomi 5 0.3%

Økonomiskpolitikk

3 0.2%

å hindreFremskrittpartietå komm til ma

1 0.1%

økning i politietsbudsjetter

1 0.1%

økonomi 5 0.3%

økonomi ogavgifter

1 0.1%

økonomipolitikk 1 0.1%

økonomiskpolitikk

4 0.2%

økonomiskepolitikeen

1 0.1%

økonomispørsmål 1 0.1%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v008: 2. issue important for voting

Information [Type= discrete] [Format=character] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1476 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Page 87: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 87 -

File : NSD1487# v008: 2. issue important for voting

Literal question Can you name one or two issues which had particular influence on the way you voted?

... B. Issue 2

Interviewer's instructions If R. only mention one issue, ask if there are more issues that are important. We will later return to why R. did not vote

Value Label Cases Percentage

'skole 1 0.1%

(8) nekter/vilikke svare

4 0.3%

(9) vet ikke 127 8.6%

++++ 1 0.1%

, 1 0.1%

0 9 0.6%

00 2 0.1%

999 2 0.1%

ARBEID FORALLE

1 0.1%

ARBEIDSLEDIGHET 1 0.1%

AVGIFTSPOLITIKK 1 0.1%

Aktiv dødshjelp 1 0.1%

Aldershjem 1 0.1%

Arbeid 1 0.1%

Arbeidsgiveravgift 1 0.1%

Arbeidsledighet 1 0.1%

Arbeidsplasser 2 0.1%

Arbeistagervern 1 0.1%

Asylpolitikk 1 0.1%

Avgifter 4 0.3%

BARNEHAGEPOLITIKK 1 0.1%

Barn ogoppvekst

1 0.1%

Barn og unge 1 0.1%

Barne- ogfamiliepolitikk

1 0.1%

Barnehage 1 0.1%

Bedrekollektivtrafikk

1 0.1%

Begrenseinnvandring

1 0.1%

Beholdekontantstøtten

1 0.1%

BorgerligFlertall

1 0.1%

Distrikt 2 0.1%

Distriktspolitikk 1 0.1%

ELDREOMSORG 1 0.1%

Page 88: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 88 -

File : NSD1487# v008: 2. issue important for voting

Value Label Cases Percentage

ELDREOMSORGEN 1 0.1%

EU-saken 1 0.1%

Eiendomsskatt 1 0.1%

Eldre 6 0.4%

Eldre og sykehjemsplasser 1 0.1%

Eldre/Skole 1 0.1%

Eldreomsorg 14 0.9%

Eldreomsorgen 8 0.5%

Eldrepolitikk 4 0.3%

Eldresaken 1 0.1%

Eldtrepolitikk 1 0.1%

Enkeltmenneske 1 0.1%

Enkeltmennesketsvelferd

1 0.1%

FAMILIEN 1 0.1%

FAMILIEPOLITIKK 1 0.1%

Fagligerettigheter

1 0.1%

Familiepolitikk 3 0.2%

Fattigdom 2 0.1%

Fellesskapsløysingar 1 0.1%

Finans 1 0.1%

Finanskrisen 1 0.1%

Finanspolitikk 1 0.1%

Flere godeministre

1 0.1%

Forbruk 1 0.1%

Fordeling avsamfunnsgoder/plikter

1 0.1%

Fordelingskattepenger

1 0.1%

Formueskatt 1 0.1%

Fornuftig styring 1 0.1%

Forskning 1 0.1%

Forvaltning avpensjonsfondet

1 0.1%

Funksjonshemmedesrettughet

1 0.1%

Få billig strømtil industrien

1 0.1%

God fordelingspolitikk 1 0.1%

HELEPOLITIKK 1 0.1%

HELSE OG VELFERDSPOLITIKKENGENERELT

1 0.1%

Page 89: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 89 -

File : NSD1487# v008: 2. issue important for voting

Value Label Cases Percentage

HELSEPOLITIKK 2 0.1%

HELSEPOLITIKKEN 1 0.1%

HELSEPOLITIKKENGENERELT

1 0.1%

Helse 17 1.2%

Helse og eldre 1 0.1%

Helse og omsorg 2 0.1%

Helse-sosialpolitikk

1 0.1%

Helse-og sosial 1 0.1%

Helse/Eldrre 1 0.1%

Helse/omsorg 1 0.1%

Helsepolitikk 5 0.3%

Helsepolitiskesaker

1 0.1%

Helsesektoren 1 0.1%

Hva staten ikkeskal gjøre

1 0.1%

IA avtalenvidereføring

1 0.1%

IA-arbeidet 1 0.1%

INNVANDRING 1 0.1%

INNVANDRINGSPOLITIKK 1 0.1%

INNVANDRINGSPOLITIKKEN 1 0.1%

Ikke oljeboring iLofoten

1 0.1%

Ingen spesefik 1 0.1%

Innenrikspolitikk 1 0.1%

Innv. 1 0.1%

Innvandring 19 1.3%

Innvandringspolitikk 2 0.1%

Innvandringspolitikken 1 0.1%

Innvandringsspørsmål 1 0.1%

Innvardringspolitikk 1 0.1%

Justispolitikken 1 0.1%

KRIMININALPOLITIKK 1 0.1%

KVLITETENPÅ SYKEHJEMSDRIFT

1 0.1%

Klima 2 0.1%

Kollektivtransport

1 0.1%

Kommunaløkonomi 1 0.1%

Kontantstøtte 1 0.1%

Kontantstøtten 1 0.1%

Kraftutbygging 1 0.1%

Page 90: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 90 -

File : NSD1487# v008: 2. issue important for voting

Value Label Cases Percentage

Krimi.politikken 1 0.1%

Kriminalitetspolitikken 1 0.1%

Kriminalomsorg 1 0.1%

Kristeligeverdier

1 0.1%

Kultur 2 0.1%

Kultur - idrett 1 0.1%

Kultur/miljø 1 0.1%

Kulturpolitikk 1 0.1%

Landbruk 2 0.1%

Landbrukspolitikk 3 0.2%

Livvsyn 1 0.1%

Lofoten/vesterålen

1 0.1%

Lokal interesser 1 0.1%

MERVALGFRIHET-BØR KUNNEVELGE SELV

1 0.1%

MILJØ -SPESIELTOLJEBORINGI NORD

1 0.1%

MILJØSPØRSMÅL 1 0.1%

MILJØVERN 1 0.1%

Mildere strafferi nOrge

1 0.1%

Milj 1 0.1%

Miljø 20 1.4%

Miljø, naturvern 1 0.1%

Miljøpolitikken 1 0.1%

Miljøsaken 1 0.1%

Miljøspørsmål 1 0.1%

Miljøvern 1 0.1%

NAV 1 0.1%

NAV-systemet 1 0.1%

Nato 1 0.1%

Norges rolle iAfghanistan

1 0.1%

Næring 1 0.1%

Næringslivet 1 0.1%

Offentlig sektor 1 0.1%

Olje Lofoten/Veterålen

1 0.1%

Olje i Lofoten 1 0.1%

Oljeboring 1 0.1%

Page 91: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 91 -

File : NSD1487# v008: 2. issue important for voting

Value Label Cases Percentage

Oljeboring iBArentshavet

1 0.1%

Oljeboringutenfor lofoten

1 0.1%

Oljeutvinning 1 0.1%

Oljeutvinning inordområdene

1 0.1%

Oljeutvinninga iLofoten

1 0.1%

Opplæring ikristen tro forbarna her

1 0.1%

Opprustning avpolitiet

1 0.1%

Oppvekstpolitikk 1 0.1%

POSETIV EKTESKAPSLINJEN 1 0.1%

Pensjon 1 0.1%

Pensjonistreformen 1 0.1%

Pensjonsrettigheter

1 0.1%

Pensjonssaken 1 0.1%

Politiet 1 0.1%

Politietsressurser

1 0.1%

Politisak 1 0.1%

Privat/offentligstyring

1 0.1%

Privatisering 1 0.1%

Privatisering/ offentligevelferdsordni

1 0.1%

REGJERINGSENDRING 1 0.1%

Redusert statligstyring

1 0.1%

Reduserteavgifter ogbyråkrati

1 0.1%

Regjeringsskifte 1 0.1%

Rentenivå 1 0.1%

Rovdyr 1 0.1%

Rovdyrpolitikk 1 0.1%

Rovdyrpolitikken 2 0.1%

SAMFERDSEL 1 0.1%

SKATTEPOLITIKKEN 1 0.1%

SKOLE 3 0.2%

SKOLE OG UTDANNINGSPOLITIKKEN 1 0.1%

1 0.1%

Page 92: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 92 -

File : NSD1487# v008: 2. issue important for voting

Value Label Cases Percentage

SKOLE-BARNEHAGE

SKOLEPOLITIKK 1 0.1%

SOSIALGFORD. 1 0.1%

Samfedselspolitikk 1 0.1%

Samferdsel 9 0.6%

Sjuke- og eldrepolitikk

1 0.1%

Skatt 9 0.6%

Skatt i offshore 1 0.1%

Skatt på arv,formue

1 0.1%

Skattepolitikk 1 0.1%

Skatter 1 0.1%

Skatter og avgift 1 0.1%

Skatter, avgifter 1 0.1%

Skattespørsmål 1 0.1%

Skole 24 1.6%

Skole ogbarnehage

1 0.1%

Skole ogutdanning

2 0.1%

Skole/SFO 1 0.1%

Skole/utdanning 1 0.1%

Skolefritidsordning 1 0.1%

Skolepolitikk 10 0.7%

Skolepolitikken 3 0.2%

Skolesektor 1 0.1%

Skolke 1 0.1%

Skulepolitikk 1 0.1%

Små ogmellomstorebedrifter

1 0.1%

Solidaritet 1 0.1%

Sosialpolitikk 2 0.1%

Statsministerspørsmålet 1 0.1%

Sykehus 2 0.1%

Sykelønn 1 0.1%

Syssselsettingspolitikken 1 0.1%

Taktisk 1 0.1%

Tannlege 1 0.1%

Tilretteleggingfor handicapede

1 0.1%

Trafikk 1 0.1%

Transportplan 1 0.1%

Page 93: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 93 -

File : NSD1487# v008: 2. issue important for voting

Value Label Cases Percentage

Transporttilbud 1 0.1%

Trygd 1 0.1%

Trygdeordningen 1 0.1%

Trygdeordningerfor selvsendignæringsdr

1 0.1%

Trygghet 1 0.1%

Undervisning 2 0.1%

Unngåprivatiseringinnen off. sektor

1 0.1%

Utdananning 1 0.1%

Utdanning 4 0.3%

Utdanningspolitikken 1 0.1%

V eiutbygging 1 0.1%

VEI 1 0.1%

VELFERD 1 0.1%

VIDREFØRENÅVÆRENDEPOLITIKK

1 0.1%

Valgfrihet forborgerne

1 0.1%

Vei 1 0.1%

Veibygging 1 0.1%

Veier 1 0.1%

Veiutbygging/infrastruktur

1 0.1%

Velferdsordninger 1 0.1%

Velstand for alle 1 0.1%

Verdispørsmål 1 0.1%

Vilkår fornæringslivet

1 0.1%

abortsaken 1 0.1%

aktiv dødshjelp 3 0.2%

aldersomsorg 1 0.1%

alkoholloven 1 0.1%

annsetelsespraksis ikommunen

1 0.1%

arbeid for alle 3 0.2%

arbeid og velferd 1 0.1%

arbeiderpartietsstyring

1 0.1%

arbeids ledighet 1 0.1%

arbeidsledighet 1 0.1%

arbeidslivspolitikk 1 0.1%

Page 94: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 94 -

File : NSD1487# v008: 2. issue important for voting

Value Label Cases Percentage

arbeidsplasser 1 0.1%

arveavgift 2 0.1%

arveavgifta 1 0.1%

asyl og integreringspolitikken 1 0.1%

asylpolit.-utdanning

1 0.1%

asylpolitikk 4 0.3%

asylpolitikken 1 0.1%

atom kraftenergi somressurs

1 0.1%

avgifter 7 0.5%

avgifterbomavgifter mm

1 0.1%

avgiftsnivå 1 0.1%

avgiftsnivåeti det norskesamfunnet

1 0.1%

avgiftspolitikk 3 0.2%

avkristning avNorge

1 0.1%

b 1 0.1%

barn 3 0.2%

barn og ungdom 1 0.1%

barn unge 1 0.1%

barne ogfamiliepolitikk

1 0.1%

barne ogungdom

1 0.1%

barne ogungdomsomsorg

1 0.1%

barne og unge 1 0.1%

barnehage 2 0.1%

barnehage,oppvekst

1 0.1%

barnehageplasser 1 0.1%

barnehagepolitikk 1 0.1%

barnehager 2 0.1%

barnehager etc 1 0.1%

barnehavepolitikk 1 0.1%

barns levekår 1 0.1%

bedre skole 1 0.1%

bedreskoletilbud

1 0.1%

bekymret for fremskrittspartiet 1 0.1%

bensinavgiften 1 0.1%

Page 95: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 95 -

File : NSD1487# v008: 2. issue important for voting

Value Label Cases Percentage

bistand 1 0.1%

boligmarkedet 1 0.1%

bomavgifter 1 0.1%

bomfinansiering 1 0.1%

bompenger/avgifter

1 0.1%

bomringer 1 0.1%

bomstasjoner 1 0.1%

bremsetilstrømningenav asylsøkere

1 0.1%

bruk avoljefondet

2 0.1%

bruk avpensjonsfondetsmidler

1 0.1%

bryr meg ikkjeså mykje

1 0.1%

bærekraftigutvikling

1 0.1%

de eldre 1 0.1%

den nyeekteskapsloven

1 0.1%

diskrimineringp.g.a hudfargeell religi

1 0.1%

disponering avoljefondet

1 0.1%

distriksp 1 0.1%

distriktspolitikk 9 0.6%

distriktspolitikk,drive jordbruk

1 0.1%

dårlig helse ogsosialpolitikk

1 0.1%

edrepolitikk 1 0.1%

egen frihet 1 0.1%

egen frihetformye styring

1 0.1%

egen matproduksjon

1 0.1%

egenandelserved legebesøk

1 0.1%

eiendomskatt 1 0.1%

eiendomsskatt 1 0.1%

ekteskapsloven 2 0.1%

eldre 8 0.5%

eldre ogyrkeshemmede

1 0.1%

Page 96: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 96 -

File : NSD1487# v008: 2. issue important for voting

Value Label Cases Percentage

eldreomsorg 35 2.4%

eldreomsorgen 9 0.6%

eldreomsorrg 1 0.1%

eldrep 1 0.1%

eldrepoliti 1 0.1%

eldrepolitikk 7 0.5%

eldrepolitikken 2 0.1%

eldresaken 1 0.1%

eldresaken ogde fattige isamfunnet

1 0.1%

eldresaker 1 0.1%

elkratt 1 0.1%

energi 1 0.1%

eu 1 0.1%

europatilknytningen 1 0.1%

famileipolitikk 1 0.1%

familie ogomsorg

1 0.1%

familiep. 1 0.1%

familiepolitikk 3 0.2%

familipolitikk 1 0.1%

fammilie 1 0.1%

fattigdom 1 0.1%

fattigdommen 1 0.1%

finans 1 0.1%

finanskrisen 1 0.1%

fiskeri 1 0.1%

fjerning av bomveifinansiering

1 0.1%

fordeling 1 0.1%

fordeling avgodene

1 0.1%

fordeling avnorsk økonomi

1 0.1%

fordeling isamfunnet

1 0.1%

fordelingspolitikk 3 0.2%

fordelingspolitikken 1 0.1%

forkningutdanning

1 0.1%

formu skatten 1 0.1%

formuebeskatning 1 0.1%

formueskatt 1 0.1%

formueskatten 1 0.1%

Page 97: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 97 -

File : NSD1487# v008: 2. issue important for voting

Value Label Cases Percentage

forskning/utdanning

1 0.1%

forskningspolitikk 1 0.1%

forsvar 1 0.1%

foten, miljø,bevaring avpostterminalan

1 0.1%

fri tannlege 1 0.1%

frihet forenkeltmennesket

1 0.1%

friskoler 1 0.1%

fødselspermisjon 1 0.1%

gasskraftverk 1 0.1%

handicappsaken 1 0.1%

helse 47 3.2%

helse ogomsorgen

1 0.1%

helse ogeldrepolitikk

1 0.1%

helse og omsorg 6 0.4%

helse og sosial 3 0.2%

helse og sosial' 1 0.1%

helse ogsosialpolitikken

1 0.1%

helse omsorg 2 0.1%

helse, kollektivtransp

1 0.1%

helse, samiskhelse

1 0.1%

helse,sykehus 1 0.1%

helse. vilkår for funksjonshemmede 1 0.1%

helse/omsorg 1 0.1%

helsekøene 1 0.1%

helsekøer 1 0.1%

helseomsorg 1 0.1%

helsepolitikk 8 0.5%

helsepolitikken 5 0.3%

helsesektoren 3 0.2%

helsetjenesten 1 0.1%

helsevesen 1 0.1%

helsevesenet 3 0.2%

hjelpetiltakoffentlig sektor'

1 0.1%

homofoli 1 0.1%

homoretigheter 1 0.1%

Page 98: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 98 -

File : NSD1487# v008: 2. issue important for voting

Value Label Cases Percentage

høyere stipendtil studenter

1 0.1%

høyereutdanning/forskning

1 0.1%

høyt avgiftsnivå 1 0.1%

idrettsanleggsbygging 1 0.1%

ikke noe spesieltannet

1 0.1%

ikke for myeskattelette

1 0.1%

ikke noe annet 1 0.1%

ikke senkeskattene

1 0.1%

industri 1 0.1%

industri/arbeidsplasser

1 0.1%

infrastruktur 1 0.1%

infrastuktur 1 0.1%

innføring avheildagsskule

1 0.1%

innskjæringskole

1 0.1%

innvandiringspolitikk 1 0.1%

innvandrer/Krekar-saken

1 0.1%

innvandrere somikke returneres

1 0.1%

innvandring 33 2.2%

innvandringspolitikk

1 0.1%

innvandringspo 1 0.1%

innvandringspolitikk 8 0.5%

innvandringspolitikk,strammere

1 0.1%

innvandringspolitikken 4 0.3%

innvanring 1 0.1%

integerering ogskole

1 0.1%

integrering 2 0.1%

integrering avasylsøkere

1 0.1%

internasjonalhandel

1 0.1%

intregnering 1 0.1%

intregreringspolitikk

1 0.1%

invandring 1 0.1%

Page 99: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 99 -

File : NSD1487# v008: 2. issue important for voting

Value Label Cases Percentage

invandringspolitik 1 0.1%

invandringspolitikk 2 0.1%

ivareta svakegrupper isamfunnet

1 0.1%

jernbanesatsing 1 0.1%

juspolitikk 1 0.1%

justispolitikken 2 0.1%

kamp motfattigdommen

1 0.1%

kirkelige verdier 1 0.1%

klima 4 0.3%

kollektivtilbud 1 0.1%

kollektivtransport 1 0.1%

kommunedialoger dårlig må blibedre

1 0.1%

konstantstøtte 1 0.1%

kontanstøte 1 0.1%

kontantstøtte 2 0.1%

kontiniutet rødgrønn regj fåfortsette

1 0.1%

kraft 1 0.1%

kriminalitet 1 0.1%

kriminaliteten 1 0.1%

kriminalomsorg 1 0.1%

kriminalpolitikk 1 0.1%

kriminalpolitikken 1 0.1%

kristendom 1 0.1%

kristligeverdisyn

1 0.1%

kristne verdier 2 0.1%

kule 1 0.1%

kultur 1 0.1%

kunskap 1 0.1%

landbrukspolitikk 3 0.2%

landbrukspolitikken 1 0.1%

lavere skatt 1 0.1%

lavere skatter 2 0.1%

like levekår 1 0.1%

likelønn 2 0.1%

likestilling 3 0.2%

liktehelseministeren

1 0.1%

Page 100: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 100 -

File : NSD1487# v008: 2. issue important for voting

Value Label Cases Percentage

livsynsspørsmål 1 0.1%

lov og orden 1 0.1%

løftebrudd 1 0.1%

lønnspolitikk 1 0.1%

lønnspolitikken 1 0.1%

mat i skole 1 0.1%

menneskesyn 2 0.1%

mer penger tilomsoirg

1 0.1%

mer politi rundtom i distrikter

1 0.1%

mer sykehjem/omsorgsboligetc

1 0.1%

miljø 49 3.3%

miljø, 1 0.1%

miljøet 1 0.1%

miljøpolitikk 2 0.1%

miljøpolitikke 1 0.1%

miljøsaker 1 0.1%

miljøspørsmål 3 0.2%

miljøvern 5 0.3%

mindreskatt-billigerebiler (avgifter)

1 0.1%

minstepensjon 1 0.1%

mot eu 1 0.1%

mot oljeboring iLofoten

1 0.1%

n 2 0.1%

nei spiller ingenrolle

1 0.1%

nei til EU 1 0.1%

nn 3 0.2%

norges forholdtil Israel

1 0.1%

norsk asyl og innvandrerpolitikk 1 0.1%

næringpolitkk 1 0.1%

næringsliv 1 0.1%

næringspolitikk 5 0.3%

næringsspørsmålsmå ogmellomstorebedri

1 0.1%

nærmiljøet 1 0.1%

1 0.1%

Page 101: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 101 -

File : NSD1487# v008: 2. issue important for voting

Value Label Cases Percentage

offenliggjøringav privatinformasjon ()

og det va no såmangt ja skule

1 0.1%

olje utvinning iLofoten

1 0.1%

oljeboring 3 0.2%

oljeboring i nord 1 0.1%

oljeborring 1 0.1%

oljefeltutbygging 1 0.1%

oljeleting 1 0.1%

oljen i lofoten 1 0.1%

oljerigg u.lofoten

1 0.1%

oljeutbygging 1 0.1%

oljeutvinning iNord Norge

1 0.1%

omsorg 1 0.1%

omsorg forandre mennesker

1 0.1%

omsorg,barn ogeldre

1 0.1%

ooffentligforbruk-skatter

1 0.1%

opprettholdenåværendeekteskapslov

1 0.1%

organisering av velferdssamfunnet 1 0.1%

pensjon 1 0.1%

pensjonpoeng 1 0.1%

pensjonsordninger 1 0.1%

pensjonsspm 1 0.1%

personvern 1 0.1%

politikernesframferd

1 0.1%

primærneæeinger 1 0.1%

privat økonomi 1 0.1%

private aktører ihelsevesen

1 0.1%

private skole 1 0.1%

privatisering 3 0.2%

privatisering avskoler

1 0.1%

privatiseringhelsevesen

1 0.1%

1 0.1%

Page 102: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 102 -

File : NSD1487# v008: 2. issue important for voting

Value Label Cases Percentage

privatiseringpostverk

psykiatri 1 0.1%

regjeringenssammensetning

1 0.1%

regjeringsspm. 1 0.1%

ressurser tilpolitiet

1 0.1%

retten til arbeid 1 0.1%

ro i arb ro lo-naf 1 0.1%

rovdyrforvaltning 1 0.1%

rovdyrpolitikk 1 0.1%

rovdyrpolitikken 1 0.1%

rus, invandring 1 0.1%

rusomsorg 1 0.1%

rusomsorgarbeid

1 0.1%

rusomsorgen 1 0.1%

saksbeh. avasylsøkere/raskerehjemsenda

1 0.1%

samferdesel 1 0.1%

samferdsel 33 2.2%

samferdsel veiermv

1 0.1%

samferdsle 1 0.1%

samferswl 1 0.1%

samfunnsutvikling 1 0.1%

samfunnsøkonomi 1 0.1%

samfunnsøkonomien 1 0.1%

selvbestemmelsesrett 1 0.1%

selvstnæringdrivendesbetingelser

1 0.1%

sikrearbeidsplasser

1 0.1%

sjukehushelsestell

1 0.1%

sjukehus/helsestell

1 0.1%

sjøfolks pensjon 1 0.1%

skatt 20 1.4%

skatt iftnæringsdrivende

1 0.1%

skatt motsmåbedrifter

1 0.1%

Page 103: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 103 -

File : NSD1487# v008: 2. issue important for voting

Value Label Cases Percentage

skatt og avgift 3 0.2%

skatt og avgifter 1 0.1%

skatt.mell bedr.genersj.skift' 1 0.1%

skatt/avgifter 1 0.1%

skatt/finanskrisen

1 0.1%

skatte og avgiftpolitikk

1 0.1%

skatte ogavgiftspol

1 0.1%

skattenedsettelse 1 0.1%

skattepolitikk 5 0.3%

skattepolitikken 3 0.2%

skatter 2 0.1%

skatter avgifter 1 0.1%

skatter og avgift 1 0.1%

skatter ogavgifter

5 0.3%

skatter, avg. 1 0.1%

skatter, avgifter 1 0.1%

skatter/avgifter 1 0.1%

skole 70 4.7%

skole ogutdanning

1 0.1%

skole (å innførekarakterer)

1 0.1%

skole /utdanning

1 0.1%

skole ogbarnehage

1 0.1%

skole ogutdannelse

2 0.1%

skole ogutdanning

7 0.5%

skole,eldreomsorg 1 0.1%

skole,miljø 1 0.1%

skole-utdannelse 1 0.1%

skole/utdanning 7 0.5%

skole/utdanningbarn

1 0.1%

skolen 1 0.1%

skolep. 1 0.1%

skolepolitikk 21 1.4%

skolepolitikken 6 0.4%

skolepolitten iutlandet

1 0.1%

Page 104: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 104 -

File : NSD1487# v008: 2. issue important for voting

Value Label Cases Percentage

skoler ogungdom

1 0.1%

skolesektoren 1 0.1%

skule 1 0.1%

skule eldrefattigdom

1 0.1%

skule ogoppvekst

1 0.1%

skule utdaning 1 0.1%

skulepolitikk 1 0.1%

slole 1 0.1%

småmellomstorebedrifterarbeidgiveravg

1 0.1%

små ogmellomstorebedr

1 0.1%

småbedrifter 1 0.1%

solidaritetsbegrepet 1 0.1%

solidaritetstanken 1 0.1%

sosial dumping 1 0.1%

sosial profil 1 0.1%

sosial. 1 0.1%

sosialdemokratiet 1 0.1%

sosialeforskjeller

1 0.1%

sosiale rettferd 1 0.1%

sosialismen 1 0.1%

sosiallovgivningen 1 0.1%

sosialpoliotkk 1 0.1%

sosialpolitikk 1 0.1%

sosoalpolitikk 1 0.1%

stabilitet 1 0.1%

stimulanseprivat næringsliv

1 0.1%

strengereinnvandring

1 0.1%

støtte kulturlivet 1 0.1%

svake samfunnsgrupper 1 0.1%

sykehjem 1 0.1%

sykehus-eldreomsorg

1 0.1%

sykehusplass tilalle

1 0.1%

sykelønn 1 0.1%

Page 105: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 105 -

File : NSD1487# v008: 2. issue important for voting

Value Label Cases Percentage

sykelønn forgod- myemisbruk

1 0.1%

toppskatt 1 0.1%

tror ikke noe bliranderledes

1 0.1%

troverdig regjeringsalternativ 1 0.1%

troverdigøkonomiskpolitikk

1 0.1%

troverdighet 1 0.1%

trygd/pensjon 1 0.1%

trygderettigheter 1 0.1%

trygghet på gate,mer politi

1 0.1%

uenig iskattelette.

1 0.1%

uhjelp 1 0.1%

ungdomsmiljø 1 0.1%

unngå frp iregjering

1 0.1%

usikkre forholdfor musikere

1 0.1%

utdannelse 1 0.1%

utdanning 9 0.6%

utdanningspolitikken 1 0.1%

uten FRP 1 0.1%

utenlanskemilitæreoperasjoner

1 0.1%

utenriks 1 0.1%

utenrikspolitikk 3 0.2%

utenrikspolitikken 1 0.1%

utviling miljø 1 0.1%

veger 2 0.1%

vegpolitikk 1 0.1%

vei 2 0.1%

vei ogsamferdsel

1 0.1%

vei/transport 1 0.1%

veier 1 0.1%

veistandard 1 0.1%

veiutbygging 1 0.1%

veiutbygging.kollektivtilbud

1 0.1%

velferd 4 0.3%

Page 106: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 106 -

File : NSD1487# v008: 2. issue important for voting

Value Label Cases Percentage

velferds- og arbeidslivspolitikk 1 0.1%

velferdsordninger 1 0.1%

velferdsordninger,pensjon

1 0.1%

velferdspolitikk 3 0.2%

velferdssamfunnet 2 0.1%

velferdsstaten 1 0.1%

velferdstat 1 0.1%

velsferd 1 0.1%

verdiskapningfør forbruk.

1 0.1%

verdispørsmål 2 0.1%

vil ikkjeprivatisere detoffentlige

1 0.1%

vilkår forarbeidslivet

1 0.1%

vindmøllesaken 1 0.1%

xxxx 1 0.1%

ØKONOMI 1 0.1%

ØKONOMISKEPOLITIKK

1 0.1%

Økonomi 7 0.5%

Økonomisk 1 0.1%

Økonomiskpolitikk

5 0.3%

Økonomisksituasjon

1 0.1%

å oppheveden nyeekteskapsloven

1 0.1%

økonmisksystem

1 0.1%

økonomi 20 1.4%

økonomi gen. 1 0.1%

økonomien 1 0.1%

økonomiskansvarlighet

1 0.1%

økonomiskpolitikk

4 0.3%

økonomiskstyring

1 0.1%

økonomiskepolitikken

2 0.1%

ønsker red utvhjelp og mindreinnvandri

1 0.1%

ütdanning 1 0.1%

Page 107: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 107 -

File : NSD1487# v008: 2. issue important for voting

Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v009: Norway's aid to developing countries

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Some people think that the amount of aid Norway gives to poor countries, the so-called developing countries, should be cutback, while others believe it should be maintained at the present level, or even increased. What is your position, do you thinkthat the amount of aid Norway gives to the developing countries should be cut back, should it be maintained at the presentlevel, or should it be increased?

Interviewer's instructions If there is some doubt as to which answer applies, check the box for 'other answers'.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Should be cut back 432 24.2%

2 Should be maintained at present level 1073 60.2%

3 Should be increased 213 12.0%

4 Other answers 55 3.1%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 9 0.5%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v010: View on alcohol regulations

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question In this country, as you know, the public authorities have put into effect many regulations governing the use of alcohol. Howdo you regard these regulations: do you consider them to be too severe, or do you fell they are too lenient?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Too severe 421 23.6%

2 Appropriate 1021 57.3%

3 Too lenient 326 18.3%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 14 0.8%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v011: The old and well proven is better than new-fangled ideas

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Now we come to a number of opinions which are sometimes heard to be expressed. For each of the following statements thatI read out, can you tell me whether you react with the complete agreement, qualified agreement, qualified disagreement, orcomplete disagreement?

... A. The old and well proven is usually better than new-fangled ideas.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Complete agreement 157 8.8%

2 Qualified agreement 579 32.5%

3 Yes and no 239 13.4%

4 Qualified disagreement 618 34.7%

5 Complete agreement 174 9.8%

Page 108: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 108 -

File : NSD1487# v011: The old and well proven is better than new-fangled ideas

Value Label Cases Percentage

8 Won't answer 4 0.2%

9 Don't know 11 0.6%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v012: Should allow oil and gas extraction, Lofoten, Vesterålen.

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Now we come to a number of opinions which are sometimes heard to be expressed. For each of the following statements thatI read out, can you tell me whether you react with the complete agreement, qualified agreement, qualified disagreement, orcomplete disagreement?

... B. We should allow oil and gas extraction outside Lofoten and Vesterålen.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Complete agreement 389 21.8%

2 Qualified agreement 418 23.5%

3 Yes and no 147 8.2%

4 Qualified disagreement 359 20.1%

5 Complete agreement 410 23.0%

8 Won't answer 2 0.1%

9 Don't know 57 3.2%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v013: Too little emphasis on environmental protection

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-5] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Now we come to a number of opinions which are sometimes heard to be expressed. For each of the following statements thatI read out, can you tell me whether you react with the complete agreement, qualified agreement, qualified disagreement, orcomplete disagreement?

... C. There is too little emphasis on environmental protection in today's Norway.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Complete agreement 391 21.9%

2 Qualified agreement 594 33.3%

3 Yes and no 115 6.5%

4 Qualified disagreement 500 28.1%

5 Complete agreement 168 9.4%

8 Won't answer 2 0.1%

9 Don't know 12 0.7%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v014: Immigration represents a grave threat to our nation's character

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Now we come to a number of opinions which are sometimes heard to be expressed. For each of the following statements thatI read out, can you tell me whether you react with the complete agreement, qualified agreement, qualified disagreement, orcomplete disagreement?

Page 109: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 109 -

File : NSD1487# v014: Immigration represents a grave threat to our nation's character

... D. Immigration represents a grave threat to our nation's character

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Complete agreement 350 19.6%

2 Qualified agreement 383 21.5%

3 Yes and no 100 5.6%

4 Qualified disagreement 553 31.0%

5 Complete agreement 388 21.8%

8 Won't answer 2 0.1%

9 Don't know 6 0.3%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v015: Full employment- the state more influence

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Now we come to a number of opinions which are sometimes heard to be expressed. For each of the following statements thatI read out, can you tell me whether you react with the complete agreement, qualified agreement, qualified disagreement, orcomplete disagreement?

... E. Full employment can be more easily secured if the state gets more impact over the banks 'and companies' business.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Complete agreement 138 7.7%

2 Qualified agreement 480 26.9%

3 Yes and no 191 10.7%

4 Qualified disagreement 566 31.8%

5 Complete agreement 329 18.5%

8 Won't answer 3 0.2%

9 Don't know 75 4.2%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v016: Open for considerable reductions of duties and taxes

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Now we come to a number of opinions which are sometimes heard to be expressed. For each of the following statements thatI read out, can you tell me whether you react with the complete agreement, qualified agreement, qualified disagreement, orcomplete disagreement?

... F. The current economic situation is open for considerable reductions of duties and taxes

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Complete agreement 285 16.0%

2 Qualified agreement 490 27.5%

3 Yes and no 133 7.5%

4 Qualified disagreement 607 34.1%

5 Complete agreement 240 13.5%

8 Won't answer 2 0.1%

9 Don't know 25 1.4%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

Page 110: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 110 -

File : NSD1487# v017: Banks and industry will have too much influence.

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Now we come to a number of opinions which are sometimes heard to be expressed. For each of the following statements thatI read out, can you tell me whether you react with the complete agreement, qualified agreement, qualified disagreement, orcomplete disagreement?

... G. If the community can't control the private industry, the leaders of banks and industry will have too much influence.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Complete agreement 382 21.4%

2 Qualified agreement 670 37.6%

3 Yes and no 164 9.2%

4 Qualified disagreement 393 22.1%

5 Complete agreement 120 6.7%

8 Won't answer 2 0.1%

9 Don't know 51 2.9%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v018: Not take much account of what ordinary people think

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Now we come to a number of opinions which are sometimes heard to be expressed. For each of the following statements thatI read out, can you tell me whether you react with the complete agreement, qualified agreement, qualified disagreement, orcomplete disagreement?

... H. Those who sit in the Storting does not take much account of what ordinary people think and believe.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Complete agreement 374 21.0%

2 Qualified agreement 523 29.3%

3 Yes and no 147 8.2%

4 Qualified disagreement 567 31.8%

5 Complete agreement 160 9.0%

8 Won't answer 2 0.1%

9 Don't know 9 0.5%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v019: Best party on schools and education

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*/30/98/99]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1517 /-] [Invalid=265 /-]

Literal question We would like to hear how you feel about the parties' policy on some current issues. The question is in each case which partyyou consider to have the best policy - given that you have an opinion on the matter.

... A. Firstly, it's about schools and education. Which party has, in your opinion, the best policy within this area?

Interviewer's instructions The order of the issues is rotated. R. will only give one answer.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Red/Red Electoral Alliance 3 0.2%

2 Socialist Left Party (SV) 274 18.1%

Page 111: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 111 -

File : NSD1487# v019: Best party on schools and education

Value Label Cases Percentage

3 Labour Party (DnA) 466 30.7%

4 Liberal Party (V) 70 4.6%

5 Christian People's Party (KrF) 63 4.2%

6 Center Party (Sp) 25 1.6%

7 Conservative Party (H) 525 34.6%

8 Progress Party (FrP) 90 5.9%

9 Other parties 1 0.1%

30 No parties (30) 138

98 Won't answer 3

99 Don't know 124Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v020: Best party when it comes to duty and taxation

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-99] [Missing=*/30/98/99]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1560 /-] [Invalid=222 /-]

Literal question We would like to hear how you feel about the parties' policy on some current issues. The question is in each case which partyyou consider to have the best policy - given that you have an opinion on the matter.

... B. Then it is duty and taxation. Which party has, in your opinion, the best policy within this area?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Red/Red Electoral Alliance 6 0.4%

2 Socialist Left Party (SV) 68 4.4%

3 Labour Party (DnA) 622 39.9%

4 Liberal Party (V) 46 2.9%

5 Christian People's Party (KrF) 27 1.7%

6 Center Party (Sp) 31 2.0%

7 Conservative Party (H) 470 30.1%

8 Progress Party (FrP) 287 18.4%

9 Other parties 3 0.2%

30 No parties (30) 86

98 Won't answer 2

99 Don't know 134Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v021: Best party when it comes to immigration

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*/30/98/99]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1576 /-] [Invalid=206 /-]

Literal question We would like to hear how you feel about the parties' policy on some current issues. The question is in each case which partyyou consider to have the best policy - given that you have an opinion on the matter.

... C. When it comes to immigration. Which party has, in your opinion, the best policy?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Red/Red Electoral Alliance 11 0.7%

2 Socialist Left Party (SV) 112 7.1%

Page 112: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 112 -

File : NSD1487# v021: Best party when it comes to immigration

Value Label Cases Percentage

3 Labour Party (DnA) 444 28.2%

4 Liberal Party (V) 80 5.1%

5 Christian People's Party (KrF) 52 3.3%

6 Center Party (Sp) 23 1.5%

7 Conservative Party (H) 264 16.8%

8 Progress Party (FrP) 588 37.3%

9 Other parties 2 0.1%

30 No parties (30) 88

98 Won't answer 4

99 Don't know 114Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v022: Best party regarding environment conservation

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*/30/98/99]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1501 /-] [Invalid=281 /-]

Literal question We would like to hear how you feel about the parties' policy on some current issues. The question is in each case which partyyou consider to have the best policy - given that you have an opinion on the matter.

... D. Regarding conservation of the environment. What party has in your opinion the best policy?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Red/Red Electoral Alliance 9 0.6%

2 Socialist Left Party (SV) 627 41.8%

3 Labour Party (DnA) 275 18.3%

4 Liberal Party (V) 266 17.7%

5 Christian People's Party (KrF) 23 1.5%

6 Center Party (Sp) 82 5.5%

7 Conservative Party (H) 134 8.9%

8 Progress Party (FrP) 73 4.9%

9 Other parties 12 0.8%

30 No parties (30) 134

98 Won't answer 3

99 Don't know 144Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v023: Best party when it comes to taking care of the elderly

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*/30/98/99]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1433 /-] [Invalid=349 /-]

Literal question We would like to hear how you feel about the parties' policy on some current issues. The question is in each case which partyyou consider to have the best policy - given that you have an opinion on the matter.

... E. When it comes to taking care of the elderly; which party has, in your opinion, the best policy?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Red/Red Electoral Alliance 5 0.3%

2 Socialist Left Party (SV) 87 6.1%

Page 113: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 113 -

File : NSD1487# v023: Best party when it comes to taking care of the elderly

Value Label Cases Percentage

3 Labour Party (DnA) 651 45.4%

4 Liberal Party (V) 35 2.4%

5 Christian People's Party (KrF) 158 11.0%

6 Center Party (Sp) 28 2.0%

7 Conservative Party (H) 195 13.6%

8 Progress Party (FrP) 257 17.9%

9 Other parties 17 1.2%

30 No parties (30) 183

98 Won't answer 2

99 Don't know 164Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v024: Best party when it comes to transport policy

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-99] [Missing=*/30/98/99]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1402 /-] [Invalid=380 /-]

Literal question We would like to hear how you feel about the parties' policy on some current issues. The question is in each case which partyyou consider to have the best policy - given that you have an opinion on the matter.

... F. When it comes to transport policy; which party has, in your opinion, the best policy?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Red/Red Electoral Alliance 5 0.4%

2 Socialist Left Party (SV) 106 7.6%

3 Labour Party (DnA) 343 24.5%

4 Liberal Party (V) 64 4.6%

5 Christian People's Party (KrF) 18 1.3%

6 Center Party (Sp) 309 22.0%

7 Conservative Party (H) 289 20.6%

8 Progress Party (FrP) 260 18.5%

9 Other parties 8 0.6%

30 No parties (30) 172

98 Won't answer 7

99 Don't know 201Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v025: Best party on issues concerning children and family

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*/30/98/99]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1487 /-] [Invalid=295 /-]

Literal question We would like to hear how you feel about the parties' policy on some current issues. The question is in each case which partyyou consider to have the best policy - given that you have an opinion on the matter.

... G. Issues concerning children and family. Which party has, in your opinion, the best policy?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Red/Red Electoral Alliance 2 0.1%

2 Socialist Left Party (SV) 252 16.9%

Page 114: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 114 -

File : NSD1487# v025: Best party on issues concerning children and family

Value Label Cases Percentage

3 Labour Party (DnA) 585 39.3%

4 Liberal Party (V) 36 2.4%

5 Christian People's Party (KrF) 373 25.1%

6 Center Party (Sp) 26 1.7%

7 Conservative Party (H) 152 10.2%

8 Progress Party (FrP) 61 4.1%

9 Other parties 0

30 No parties (30) 119

98 Won't answer 4

99 Don't know 172Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v026: Best party regarding regional policy

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*/30/98/99]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1423 /-] [Invalid=359 /-]

Literal question We would like to hear how you feel about the parties' policy on some current issues. The question is in each case which partyyou consider to have the best policy - given that you have an opinion on the matter.

... H. Regarding regional policy. Which party has, in your opinion, the best policy?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Red/Red Electoral Alliance 1 0.1%

2 Socialist Left Party (SV) 47 3.3%

3 Labour Party (DnA) 329 23.1%

4 Liberal Party (V) 100 7.0%

5 Christian People's Party (KrF) 29 2.0%

6 Center Party (Sp) 662 46.5%

7 Conservative Party (H) 166 11.7%

8 Progress Party (FrP) 82 5.8%

9 Other parties 7 0.5%

30 No parties (30) 151

98 Won't answer 5

99 Don't know 203Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v027: Best party regarding fighting unemployment

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-99] [Missing=*/30/98/99]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1520 /-] [Invalid=262 /-]

Literal question We would like to hear how you feel about the parties' policy on some current issues. The question is in each case which partyyou consider to have the best policy - given that you have an opinion on the matter.

... I. Regarding fighting unemployment; Which party has, in your opinion, the best policy?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Red/Red Electoral Alliance 4 0.3%

2 Socialist Left Party (SV) 36 2.4%

Page 115: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 115 -

File : NSD1487# v027: Best party regarding fighting unemployment

Value Label Cases Percentage

3 Labour Party (DnA) 1081 71.1%

4 Liberal Party (V) 25 1.6%

5 Christian People's Party (KrF) 19 1.2%

6 Center Party (Sp) 11 0.7%

7 Conservative Party (H) 255 16.8%

8 Progress Party (FrP) 86 5.7%

9 Other parties 3 0.2%

30 No parties (30) 129

98 Won't answer 3

99 Don't know 130Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v028: Environmental protection

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 0-10] [Missing=*/98/99]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1764 /-] [Invalid=18 /-]

Pre-question Here we have a scale running from 0 to 10. We would like to know where you would place yourself on this scale on variousquestions.

Literal question First, we have the issue concerning nature conservation and environmental protection. The value 0 expresses the desire thatenvironmental protection measures should not be taken so far as to affect our standard of living, while the value 10 expressesthe desire to see more done for environmental protection, even if it means a considerable reduction in the standard of livingfor everybody, yourself included. Where would you place yourself on this scale, or have you not you given this issue muchthought?

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Show card 2.

Value Label Cases Percentage

0 Environmental protection should not be taken so far as to affect ourliving standard

42 2.4%

1 1. 16 0.9%

2 2. 61 3.5%

3 3. 111 6.3%

4 4. 123 7.0%

5 5. 427 24.2%

6 6. 251 14.2%

7 7. 314 17.8%

8 8. 235 13.3%

9 9. 64 3.6%

10 More environmental protection 120 6.8%

98 Won't answer 8

99 Don't know 10Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v029: Norwegian immigration policy

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 0-99] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Then there is the question of Norwegian immigration policy. The value 0 expresses the view that we should make it easierfor immigrants to enter Norway; while the value 10 expresses the opinion that the number of immigrants coming to Norway

Page 116: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 116 -

File : NSD1487# v029: Norwegian immigration policy

should be restricted to an even greater extent than at present. Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't yougiven much thought to this issue?

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Show card 3.

Value Label Cases Percentage

0 Should make it easier for immigrants to enter Norway 22 1.2%

1 1. 7 0.4%

2 2. 42 2.4%

3 3. 69 3.9%

4 4. 94 5.3%

5 5. 336 18.9%

6 6. 144 8.1%

7 7. 244 13.7%

8 8. 287 16.1%

9 9. 116 6.5%

10 Stronger restrictions on immigration 406 22.8%

98 Vil ikke svare 7 0.4%

99 Vet ikke 8 0.4%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v030: Religious education

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 0-99] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Where would you place yourself on a scale from 0 to 10 where 0 expresses the view that the teaching of Christianity shouldbe compulsory in primary school, while 10 expresses the view that the teaching of Christianity should be voluntary inprimary school?

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Show card 4.

Value Label Cases Percentage

0 Mandatory religious education 344 19.3%

1 1. 117 6.6%

2 2. 123 6.9%

3 3. 132 7.4%

4 4. 89 5.0%

5 5. 246 13.8%

6 6. 54 3.0%

7 7. 88 4.9%

8 8. 127 7.1%

9 9. 52 2.9%

10 Voluntary religious education 391 21.9%

98 Vil ikke svare 6 0.3%

99 Vet ikke 13 0.7%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v031: Peripheral areas

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 0-99] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Page 117: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 117 -

File : NSD1487# v031: Peripheral areas

Literal question Where would you place yourself on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 means that the central Government is alreadypaying too much attention to the needs of peripheral areas, whereas 10 means that the central Government does not payenough attention to the needs of peripheral areas?

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Show card 5.

Value Label Cases Percentage

0 Central government pays too much regard to peripheral areas 152 8.5%

1 1. 99 5.6%

2 2. 202 11.3%

3 3. 239 13.4%

4 4. 208 11.7%

5 5. 543 30.5%

6 6. 101 5.7%

7 7. 92 5.2%

8 8. 69 3.9%

9 9. 18 1.0%

10 Central government pays too little regard to peripheral areas 33 1.9%

98 Vil ikke svare 7 0.4%

99 Vet ikke 19 1.1%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v032: EU membership

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 0-99] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Where would you place yourself on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 signifies the desire that Norway should definitelynot be a member of the EU, whilst 10 signifies that Norway should definitely become a member.

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Show card 6.

Value Label Cases Percentage

0 Should definitively not become a member of the EU 380 21.3%

1 1. 74 4.2%

2 2. 137 7.7%

3 3. 119 6.7%

4 4. 78 4.4%

5 5. 267 15.0%

6 6. 79 4.4%

7 7. 116 6.5%

8 8. 148 8.3%

9 9. 72 4.0%

10 Should definitively not become a member of the EU 287 16.1%

98 Won't answer 6 0.3%

99 Don't know 19 1.1%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v033: Climate change

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 0-10] [Missing=*/98/99]

Page 118: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 118 -

File : NSD1487# v033: Climate change

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1765 /-] [Invalid=17 /-]

Literal question Over to your opinion on climate change. Where would you place yourself on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 meansthat climate change is not a problem, whereas 10 means that climate change is a major problem?

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Show card 7.

Value Label Cases Percentage

0 Climate change is not a problem 39 2.2%

1 1. 15 0.8%

2 2. 40 2.3%

3 3. 59 3.3%

4 4. 47 2.7%

5 5. 254 14.4%

6 6. 131 7.4%

7 7. 264 15.0%

8 8. 333 18.9%

9 9. 158 9.0%

10 Climate change is a major problem 425 24.1%

98 Won't answer 7

99 Don't know 10Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v034: Big cities should keep significally more of their own tax income

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Pre-question Let us again look at some determents of opinion. We still use the same alternative answers as earlier.

Literal question For each of the statements that I read, can you tell me whether you react with complete agreement, qualified agreement,qualified disagreement, or complete disagreement?

... A. Big cities should keep significally more of their own tax income than what they are presently allowed to.

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Show card 1.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Complete agreement 300 16.8%

2 Qualified agreement 625 35.1%

3 Yes and no 187 10.5%

4 Qualified disagreement 424 23.8%

5 Complete agreement 183 10.3%

8 Won't answer 7 0.4%

9 Don't know 56 3.1%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v035: We should invest more in wind power

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question For each of the statements that I read, can you tell me whether you react with complete agreement, qualified agreement,qualified disagreement, or complete disagreement?

Page 119: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 119 -

File : NSD1487# v035: We should invest more in wind power

... B. We should invest more in wind power.

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Show card 1.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Complete agreement 892 50.1%

2 Qualified agreement 593 33.3%

3 Yes and no 60 3.4%

4 Qualified disagreement 135 7.6%

5 Complete agreement 78 4.4%

8 Won't answer 6 0.3%

9 Don't know 18 1.0%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v036: Reduce economic differences

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question For each of the statements that I read, can you tell me whether you react with complete agreement, qualified agreement,qualified disagreement, or complete disagreement?

... C. Economic differences are still so large that in this country the government must see it as a main task to reduce them.

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Show card 1.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Complete agreement 414 23.2%

2 Qualified agreement 647 36.3%

3 Yes and no 132 7.4%

4 Qualified disagreement 398 22.3%

5 Complete agreement 176 9.9%

8 Won't answer 7 0.4%

9 Don't know 8 0.4%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v037: Politics is often so complicated

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question For each of the statements that I read, can you tell me whether you react with complete agreement, qualified agreement,qualified disagreement, or complete disagreement?

... D. Politics is often so complicated that ordinary citizens cannot understand what is going on.

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Show card 1.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Complete agreement 408 22.9%

2 Qualified agreement 695 39.0%

3 Yes and no 92 5.2%

4 Qualified disagreement 416 23.3%

5 Complete agreement 158 8.9%

8 Won't answer 7 0.4%

Page 120: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 120 -

File : NSD1487# v037: Politics is often so complicated

Value Label Cases Percentage

9 Don't know 6 0.3%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v038: The church should be separated from the state

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question For each of the statements that I read, can you tell me whether you react with complete agreement, qualified agreement,qualified disagreement, or complete disagreement?

... E. The church should be separated from the state.

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Show card 1.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Complete agreement 562 31.5%

2 Qualified agreement 308 17.3%

3 Yes and no 102 5.7%

4 Qualified disagreement 333 18.7%

5 Complete agreement 429 24.1%

8 Won't answer 6 0.3%

9 Don't know 42 2.4%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v039: The settlement on cash benefit should be removed

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question For each of the statements that I read, can you tell me whether you react with complete agreement, qualified agreement,qualified disagreement, or complete disagreement?

... F. The settlement on cash benefit should be removed.

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Show card 1.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Complete agreement 533 29.9%

2 Qualified agreement 260 14.6%

3 Yes and no 84 4.7%

4 Qualified disagreement 352 19.8%

5 Complete agreement 518 29.1%

8 Won't answer 6 0.3%

9 Don't know 29 1.6%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v040: Norwegian jobs before reduction of greenhouse gas emission

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question For each of the statements that I read, can you tell me whether you react with complete agreement, qualified agreement,qualified disagreement, or complete disagreement?

... G. The consideration to Norwegian jobs is more important than reducing the emission of greenhouse gases.

Page 121: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 121 -

File : NSD1487# v040: Norwegian jobs before reduction of greenhouse gas emission

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Show card 1.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Complete agreement 239 13.4%

2 Qualified agreement 447 25.1%

3 Yes and no 177 9.9%

4 Qualified disagreement 634 35.6%

5 Complete agreement 253 14.2%

8 Won't answer 7 0.4%

9 Don't know 25 1.4%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v041: Should strengthen the Norwegian Armed Forces

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question For each of the statements that I read, can you tell me whether you react with complete agreement, qualified agreement,qualified disagreement, or complete disagreement?

... H. We should strengthen the Norwegian Armed Forces in the years ahead.

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Show card 1.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Complete agreement 513 28.8%

2 Qualified agreement 568 31.9%

3 Yes and no 110 6.2%

4 Qualified disagreement 420 23.6%

5 Complete agreement 143 8.0%

8 Won't answer 7 0.4%

9 Don't know 21 1.2%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v042: Part of the governemnt: AP

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Pre-question Then to some questions about knowledge of parties and politics.

Literal question Do you happen to which parties have been in government in the last parliamentary term?

... A. The Labor Party

Interviewer's instructions Alternative answers should not be mentioned, and no help should be given to R.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 1705 95.7%

2 No 43 2.4%

8 Won't answer 3 0.2%

9 Don't know 31 1.7%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

Page 122: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 122 -

File : NSD1487# v043: Part of the governemnt: SV

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Do you happen to which parties have been in government in the last parliamentary term?

... B. The Social Left Party

Interviewer's instructions Alternative answers should not be mentioned, and no help should be given to R.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 1592 89.3%

2 No 156 8.8%

8 Won't answer 3 0.2%

9 Don't know 31 1.7%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v044: Part of the governemnt: SP

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Do you happen to which parties have been in government in the last parliamentary term?

... C. The Center Party

Interviewer's instructions Alternative answers should not be mentioned, and no help should be given to R.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 1495 83.9%

2 No 253 14.2%

8 Won't answer 3 0.2%

9 Don't know 31 1.7%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v045: Part of the governemnt: Other answers

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Do you happen to which parties have been in government in the last parliamentary term?

... D. Other anwers

Interviewer's instructions Alternative answers should not be mentioned, and no help should be given to R.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 181 10.2%

2 No 1567 87.9%

8 Won't answer 3 0.2%

9 Don't know 31 1.7%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v046: Controversial areas oil/gas: Lofoten

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question

Page 123: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 123 -

File : NSD1487# v046: Controversial areas oil/gas: Lofoten

In recent years there has been disagreement about the development of new fields of oil and gas exploration on the Norwegiancontinental shelf. Can you say the two areas that have been particularly controversial?

... A. Lofoten

Interviewer's instructions Alternative answers should not be mentioned, and no help should be given to R.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 1365 76.6%

2 No 244 13.7%

8 Won't answer 4 0.2%

9 Don't know 169 9.5%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v047: Controversial areas oil/gas: Vesterålen

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question In recent years there has been disagreement about the development of new fields of oil and gas exploration on the Norwegiancontinental shelf. Can you say the two areas that have been particularly controversial?

... B. Vesterålen

Interviewer's instructions Alternative answers should not be mentioned, and no help should be given to R.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 819 46.0%

2 No 790 44.3%

8 Won't answer 4 0.2%

9 Don't know 169 9.5%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v048: Controversial areas oil/gas: Other answers

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question In recent years there has been disagreement about the development of new fields of oil and gas exploration on the Norwegiancontinental shelf. Can you say the two areas that have been particularly controversial?

... C. Andre svar

Interviewer's instructions Alternative answers should not be mentioned, and no help should be given to R.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 572 32.1%

2 No 1037 58.2%

8 Won't answer 4 0.2%

9 Don't know 169 9.5%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v049: Minister of Transport and Communications: Liv Signe Navarsete

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question

Page 124: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 124 -

File : NSD1487# v049: Minister of Transport and Communications: Liv Signe Navarsete

Do you know who has been Minister of Transport and Communications for the last year before the election, and which partythe concerned represent?

... A. Liv Signe Navarsete

Interviewer's instructions Alternative answers should not be mentioned, and no help should be given to R.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 1273 71.4%

2 No 317 17.8%

8 Won't answer 4 0.2%

9 Don't know 188 10.5%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v050: Minister of Transport and Communications: SP

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Do you know who has been Minister of Transport and Communications for the last year before the election, and which partythe concerned represent?

... B. The Center Party

Interviewer's instructions Alternative answers should not be mentioned, and no help should be given to R.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 1155 64.8%

2 No 435 24.4%

8 Won't answer 4 0.2%

9 Don't know 188 10.5%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

Page 125: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 125 -

# v051: Minister of Transport and Communications: Other answers

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Do you know who has been Minister of Transport and Communications for the last year before the election, and which partythe concerned represent?

... C. Other answers

Interviewer's instructions Alternative answers should not be mentioned, and no help should be given to R.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 268 15.0%

2 No 1322 74.2%

8 Won't answer 4 0.2%

9 Don't know 188 10.5%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v052: Opposed same-sex marriage: FrP

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Which two parties opposed the law that allows marriage between two of the same sex?

... A. The Progress Party

Interviewer's instructions Alternative answers should not be mentioned, and no help should be given to R.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 889 49.9%

2 No 749 42.0%

8 Won't answer 5 0.3%

9 Don't know 139 7.8%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v053: Opposed same-sex marriage: Krf

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Which two parties opposed the law that allows marriage between two of the same sex?

... B. The Christian People's party

Interviewer's instructions Alternative answers should not be mentioned, and no help should be given to R.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 1424 79.9%

2 No 214 12.0%

8 Won't answer 5 0.3%

9 Don't know 139 7.8%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v054: Opposed same-sex marriage: Other answers

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Which two parties opposed the law that allows marriage between two of the same sex?

Page 126: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 126 -

# v054: Opposed same-sex marriage: Other answers

... C. Other answers

Interviewer's instructions Alternative answers should not be mentioned, and no help should be given to R.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 442 24.8%

2 No 1196 67.1%

8 Won't answer 5 0.3%

9 Don't know 139 7.8%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v055: Signed your name under any appeal, protest, petition

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question We now turn to a number of questions concerning various political activities in which it is possible to participate. During thecourse of the past four years, have you:

... A. signed your name under any appeal, protest, petition, etc. in order to advance a particular political cause?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 502 28.2%

2 No 1271 71.3%

8 Won't answer 3 0.2%

9 Don't know 6 0.3%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v056: Written through internet, e-mail or text-message

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=502 /-] [Invalid=1280 /-]

Literal question Did any of this happen through internet, e-mail or text-message?

Interviewer's instructions If R. answers 'yes' in spm20a.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 246 49.0%

2 No 256 51.0%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 0Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v057: Taken part in any demonstration/action

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question We now turn to a number of questions concerning various political activities in which it is possible to participate. During thecourse of the past four years, have you:

... B. Taken part in any demonstration/action etc. to advance a particular cause?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 187 10.5%

2 No 1590 89.2%

8 Won't answer 3 0.2%

9 Don't know 2 0.1%

Page 127: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 127 -

# v057: Taken part in any demonstration/action

Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v058: Written to newspaper to advance political cause

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question We now turn to a number of questions concerning various political activities in which it is possible to participate. During thecourse of the past four years, have you:

... C. Written to some newspaper in order to advance a particular political cause?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 99 5.6%

2 No 1679 94.2%

8 Won't answer 3 0.2%

9 Don't know 1 0.1%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v059: Taken up a particular issue within a political party

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question We now turn to a number of questions concerning various political activities in which it is possible to participate. During thecourse of the past four years, have you:

... D. Taken up a particular issue within a political party, trade union, or other organizations?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 195 10.9%

2 No 1583 88.8%

8 Won't answer 3 0.2%

9 Don't know 1 0.1%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v060: Forwarded any written complaints tot he authorities

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question We now turn to a number of questions concerning various political activities in which it is possible to participate. During thecourse of the past four years, have you:

... E. forwarded any written complaints, presented other political proposals etc. to the authorities?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 152 8.5%

2 No 1626 91.2%

8 Won't answer 3 0.2%

9 Don't know 1 0.1%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v061: Written through internet, e-mail or text-message

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=152 /-] [Invalid=1630 /-]

Literal question Did any of this happen through internet, e-mail or text-message?

Interviewer's instructions If R. answers 'yes' in spm20e.

Page 128: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 128 -

# v061: Written through internet, e-mail or text-message

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 77 50.7%

2 No 75 49.3%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 0Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v062: Boycotted products for political or ethical reasons

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question We now turn to a number of questions concerning various political activities in which it is possible to participate. During thecourse of the past four years, have you:

... F. Boycotted products for political or ethical reasons?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 354 19.9%

2 No 1421 79.7%

8 Won't answer 3 0.2%

9 Don't know 4 0.2%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v063: Participated in discussions about social issues on the Internet

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question We now turn to a number of questions concerning various political activities in which it is possible to participate. During thecourse of the past four years, have you:

... G. Participated in discussions about social issues on the Internet?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 159 8.9%

2 No 1618 90.8%

8 Won't answer 3 0.2%

9 Don't know 2 0.1%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v064: Been in contact with a politician to promote a particular political issue

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question We now turn to a number of questions concerning various political activities in which it is possible to participate. During thecourse of the past four years, have you:

... H. Been in contact with a politician to promote a particular political issue?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 285 16.0%

2 No 1493 83.8%

8 Won't answer 3 0.2%

9 Don't know 1 0.1%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

Page 129: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 129 -

# v065: Did any of this happen through internet, e-mail or text-message

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=285 /-] [Invalid=1497 /-]

Literal question Did any of this happen through internet, e-mail or text-message?

Interviewer's instructions If R. answers 'yes' in spm20h.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 80 28.1%

2 No 205 71.9%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 0Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v066: Dues-paying member of any political party

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question We now turn to a number of questions concerning various political activities in which it is possible to participate. During thecourse of the past four years, have you:

... I. Are you at the present a dues-paying member of any political party?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 128 7.2%

2 No 1650 92.6%

8 Won't answer 3 0.2%

9 Don't know 1 0.1%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v067: Taken batch tests before the election

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question We now turn to a number of questions concerning various political activities in which it is possible to participate. During thecourse of the past four years, have you:

... J. Have you taken one or more of the so-called batch tests on the net before the election this year?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 683 38.3%

2 No 1095 61.4%

8 Won't answer 3 0.2%

9 Don't know 1 0.1%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v068: Batch tests importance

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=683 /-] [Invalid=1099 /-]

Literal question How important was this for your choice of party? Was it of...

Interviewer's instructions If R. answers 'yes' in spm20j.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Great importance 21 3.1%

Page 130: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 130 -

# v068: Batch tests importance

Value Label Cases Percentage

2 Some importance 140 20.5%

3 No importance 522 76.4%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 0Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v069: Nationwide and regional newspapers

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question You can get information about the election in several different ways. How important would you say that the followingsources of information was for you in this election. Where would you place your opinion on a scale ranging from 1 to 5,where 1 means "not important" and 5 means "very important".

... A. Nationwide and regional newspapers (also web editions)

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Use card 8.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 1. Not important 291 16.3%

2 2. 222 12.5%

3 3. 350 19.6%

4 4. 476 26.7%

5 5. Very important 430 24.1%

8 Won't answer 8 0.4%

9 Don't know 5 0.3%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v070: Local newspapers

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question You can get information about the election in several different ways. How important would you say that the followingsources of information was for you in this election. Where would you place your opinion on a scale ranging from 1 to 5,where 1 means "not important" and 5 means "very important".

... B. Local newspapers (also web editions)

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Use card 8.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 1. Not important 480 26.9%

2 2. 315 17.7%

3 3. 369 20.7%

4 4. 339 19.0%

5 5. Very important 266 14.9%

8 Won't answer 8 0.4%

9 Don't know 5 0.3%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v071: Spm21c Tv

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Page 131: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 131 -

# v071: Spm21c Tv

Literal question You can get information about the election in several different ways. How important would you say that the followingsources of information was for you in this election. Where would you place your opinion on a scale ranging from 1 to 5,where 1 means "not important" and 5 means "very important".

... C. TV

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Use card 8.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 1. Not important 182 10.2%

2 2. 174 9.8%

3 3. 312 17.5%

4 4. 453 25.4%

5 5. Very important 648 36.4%

8 Won't answer 8 0.4%

9 Don't know 5 0.3%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v072: Spm21d Radio

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question You can get information about the election in several different ways. How important would you say that the followingsources of information was for you in this election. Where would you place your opinion on a scale ranging from 1 to 5,where 1 means "not important" and 5 means "very important".

... D. Radio

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Use card 8.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 1. Not important 555 31.1%

2 2. 370 20.8%

3 3. 357 20.0%

4 4. 309 17.3%

5 5. Very important 178 10.0%

8 Won't answer 8 0.4%

9 Don't know 5 0.3%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v073: Internet (without online newspapers)

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question You can get information about the election in several different ways. How important would you say that the followingsources of information was for you in this election. Where would you place your opinion on a scale ranging from 1 to 5,where 1 means "not important" and 5 means "very important".

... E. Internet (without online newspapers)

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Use card 8.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 1. Not important 867 48.7%

2 2. 322 18.1%

3 3. 253 14.2%

Page 132: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 132 -

# v073: Internet (without online newspapers)

Value Label Cases Percentage

4 4. 177 9.9%

5 5. Very important 148 8.3%

8 Won't answer 8 0.4%

9 Don't know 7 0.4%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v074: Parties' campaign materials

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question You can get information about the election in several different ways. How important would you say that the followingsources of information was for you in this election. Where would you place your opinion on a scale ranging from 1 to 5,where 1 means "not important" and 5 means "very important".

... F. Parties' campaign materials (leaflets, pamphlets, etc.)

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Use card 8.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 1. Not important 925 51.9%

2 2. 363 20.4%

3 3. 275 15.4%

4 4. 121 6.8%

5 5. Very important 85 4.8%

8 Won't answer 8 0.4%

9 Don't know 5 0.3%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v075: Discussions with family and friends

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question You can get information about the election in several different ways. How important would you say that the followingsources of information was for you in this election. Where would you place your opinion on a scale ranging from 1 to 5,where 1 means "not important" and 5 means "very important".

... G. Discussions with family and friends

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Use card 8.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 1. Not important 279 15.7%

2 2. 254 14.3%

3 3. 528 29.6%

4 4. 464 26.0%

5 5. Very important 244 13.7%

8 Won't answer 8 0.4%

9 Don't know 5 0.3%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v076: Importance of print edition or online edition

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Page 133: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 133 -

# v076: Importance of print edition or online edition

Literal question Is it primarily the newspapers printed version that is most important to you, are the print edition and online edition asimportant, or is it the newspaper's online edition that is most important to you personally when it comes to information aboutthe election?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 The print edition is most important 1043 58.5%

2 As important 350 19.6%

3 The online edition is most important 369 20.7%

8 Won't answer 6 0.3%

9 Don't know 14 0.8%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v077: Trust in Local Government Committee

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 0-99] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question I would like to know how much confidence you have in certain institutions. After I have read the name of an institution,could you place it in a rangig scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means that you have no confidence at all and 10 means that you areextremely confident.

... A. Local Government Committee

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Use card 9.

Value Label Cases Percentage

0 0. No trust at all 28 1.6%

1 1. 31 1.7%

2 2. 83 4.7%

3 3. 147 8.2%

4 4. 180 10.1%

5 5. 414 23.2%

6 6. 328 18.4%

7 7. 278 15.6%

8 8. 195 10.9%

9 9. 45 2.5%

10 10. Great trust 33 1.9%

98 Won't answer 5 0.3%

99 Don't know 15 0.8%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v078: Trust in government

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 0-99] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question I would like to know how much confidence you have in certain institutions. After I have read the name of an institution,could you place it in a rangig scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means that you have no confidence at all and 10 means that you areextremely confident.

... B. The government

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Use card 9.

Value Label Cases Percentage

0 0. No trust at all 38 2.1%

Page 134: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 134 -

# v078: Trust in government

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 1. 30 1.7%

2 2. 54 3.0%

3 3. 111 6.2%

4 4. 130 7.3%

5 5. 318 17.8%

6 6. 250 14.0%

7 7. 369 20.7%

8 8. 311 17.5%

9 9. 100 5.6%

10 10. Great trust 60 3.4%

98 Won't answer 5 0.3%

99 Don't know 6 0.3%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v079: Trust in political parties

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 0-99] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question I would like to know how much confidence you have in certain institutions. After I have read the name of an institution,could you place it in a rangig scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means that you have no confidence at all and 10 means that you areextremely confident.

... C. Political parties

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Use card 9.

Value Label Cases Percentage

0 0. No trust at all 31 1.7%

1 1. 42 2.4%

2 2. 57 3.2%

3 3. 181 10.2%

4 4. 240 13.5%

5 5. 540 30.3%

6 6. 315 17.7%

7 7. 220 12.3%

8 8. 114 6.4%

9 9. 14 0.8%

10 10. Great trust 13 0.7%

98 Won't answer 5 0.3%

99 Don't know 10 0.6%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v080: Trust in the Storting (national parliament)

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 0-99] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question I would like to know how much confidence you have in certain institutions. After I have read the name of an institution,could you place it in a rangig scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means that you have no confidence at all and 10 means that you areextremely confident.

... D. The Storting (national parliament)

Page 135: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 135 -

# v080: Trust in the Storting (national parliament)

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Use card 9.

Value Label Cases Percentage

0 0. No trust at all 21 1.2%

1 1. 20 1.1%

2 2. 35 2.0%

3 3. 90 5.1%

4 4. 107 6.0%

5 5. 311 17.5%

6 6. 244 13.7%

7 7. 353 19.8%

8 8. 386 21.7%

9 9. 135 7.6%

10 10. Great trust 67 3.8%

98 Won't answer 5 0.3%

99 Don't know 8 0.4%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v081: Trust in the courts

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 0-99] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question I would like to know how much confidence you have in certain institutions. After I have read the name of an institution,could you place it in a rangig scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means that you have no confidence at all and 10 means that you areextremely confident.

... E. The courts

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Use card 9.

Value Label Cases Percentage

0 0. No trust at all 15 0.8%

1 1. 13 0.7%

2 2. 26 1.5%

3 3. 47 2.6%

4 4. 63 3.5%

5 5. 178 10.0%

6 6. 147 8.2%

7 7. 271 15.2%

8 8. 527 29.6%

9 9. 319 17.9%

10 10. Great trust 162 9.1%

98 Won't answer 5 0.3%

99 Don't know 9 0.5%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v082: Trust in politicians

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 0-99] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question

Page 136: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 136 -

# v082: Trust in politicians

I would like to know how much confidence you have in certain institutions. After I have read the name of an institution,could you place it in a rangig scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means that you have no confidence at all and 10 means that you areextremely confident.

... F. Politicians

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Use card 9.

Value Label Cases Percentage

0 0. No trust at all 45 2.5%

1 1. 42 2.4%

2 2. 110 6.2%

3 3. 185 10.4%

4 4. 235 13.2%

5 5. 506 28.4%

6 6. 297 16.7%

7 7. 229 12.9%

8 8. 96 5.4%

9 9. 13 0.7%

10 10. Great trust 11 0.6%

98 Won't answer 5 0.3%

99 Don't know 8 0.4%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v083: Trust in media

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 0-99] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question I would like to know how much confidence you have in certain institutions. After I have read the name of an institution,could you place it in a rangig scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means that you have no confidence at all and 10 means that you areextremely confident.

... G. The media

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Use card 9.

Value Label Cases Percentage

0 0. No trust at all 39 2.2%

1 1. 42 2.4%

2 2. 158 8.9%

3 3. 301 16.9%

4 4. 275 15.4%

5 5. 453 25.4%

6 6. 234 13.1%

7 7. 157 8.8%

8 8. 94 5.3%

9 9. 14 0.8%

10 10. Great trust 8 0.4%

98 Won't answer 5 0.3%

99 Don't know 2 0.1%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

Page 137: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 137 -

# v084: Commitment to vote at the Storting (national parliament) election

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question What do you think about the commitment to vote at the Storting (national parliament) election? Would you say is anextremely large commitment, a rather large commitment, a small commitment or no commitment at all?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Very large commitment 1073 60.2%

2 Fairly large commitment 514 28.8%

3 Fairly small commitment 118 6.6%

4 No commitment at all 69 3.9%

8 Won't answer 5 0.3%

9 Don't know 3 0.2%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v085: Most important challenge, Norway

Information [Type= discrete] [Format=character] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1774 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Now we turn to a few questions concerning challenges Norway is facing today as a nation. What is in your opinion the mostimportant challenge? And what is the second most important?

... A. Answer 1

Value Label Cases Percentage

(8) nekter/vilikke svare

11 0.6%

(9) vet ikke 133 7.5%

0 1 0.1%

999 1 0.1%

ARBEIDSMARKEDE 1 0.1%

Alene utenfor eu 1 0.1%

Antalluførtrygdede 1 0.1%

Arbeid for alle 3 0.2%

Arbeid til alle 2 0.1%

Arbeid til alle' 1 0.1%

Arbeidsledighet 7 0.4%

Arbeidsledigheten 1 0.1%

Arbeidsledigheten' 1 0.1%

Arbeidsplassen 1 0.1%

Arbeidsplasser 4 0.2%

Arbeidsplasser iprivat næringsliv

1 0.1%

Asylpolitikk 1 0.1%

Asylpolitikken 1 0.1%

Avgifter/Skatt 1 0.1%

Avkristningen 1 0.1%

BEVARE DET SAMFUNNSSYSTEMETVI HAR

1 0.1%

1 0.1%

Page 138: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 138 -

# v085: Most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

Ballansereansatte i off. motprivat

Barn og unge 1 0.1%

Bedre veier 1 0.1%

Begrenseinnvandring

1 0.1%

Beholdeegenarten

1 0.1%

Bevare egenart 1 0.1%

Bevarevelferdsstaten

1 0.1%

Bidrag til 3.verden når oljenslutter

1 0.1%

Byggeframtiden/forvaltearven(ungdom)

1 0.1%

Bærekraftigindustri UTENolje

1 0.1%

Bærekraftigearbeidsplasser

1 0.1%

Demokrati iverden

1 0.1%

Det kristnegrunnsyn.moralskholdning

1 0.1%

Det åndelige ilandet vårt

1 0.1%

Distrikt 1 0.1%

Distriktspolitikk 2 0.1%

Dårlegveistandard

1 0.1%

Dårligarbeidsmoral

1 0.1%

ELDREBØLGEN 1 0.1%

ELDREOMSORGEN 1 0.1%

ELDREPOLITIKK 1 0.1%

EU 4 0.2%

EU MEDLEMSKAP 1 0.1%

EUSPØRSMÅLET

1 0.1%

EU-medlemsskap

2 0.1%

Economi 1 0.1%

Eldre 4 0.2%

Eldrebefolkningen 1 0.1%

Eldrebølgen 10 0.6%

Page 139: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 139 -

# v085: Most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

Eldred 1 0.1%

Eldreomsorg 10 0.6%

Eldreomsorgen 7 0.4%

Eldreomsorgener altfor dårlig

1 0.1%

Energi 2 0.1%

Energisituasjonen 1 0.1%

Et godt samfunn 1 0.1%

Eu spørsmålet 1 0.1%

Euproblematikken

1 0.1%

Europasamarbeid 1 0.1%

FORNYBARENERGI

1 0.1%

FORVALTNINGAV NORGESRESUSSER

1 0.1%

FREDSARBEIDETVIA FN

1 0.1%

FREDSKAPENDEARBEIDE

1 0.1%

Familiepolitikk 1 0.1%

Familieøkonomi 1 0.1%

Fatigdommen iverden

1 0.1%

Fattigdom 4 0.2%

Fattigdomsbekjempelse 1 0.1%

Finans 2 0.1%

Finanskrise 1 0.1%

Finnealtternativ tiloljeøkonomien

1 0.1%

Flest mulig iarbeid

1 0.1%

Folk i arbeid 1 0.1%

Folket i arbeid 1 0.1%

Forberede livetetter olja.

1 0.1%

Fordeling avgoder i et størreperspekti

1 0.1%

Fordeling avresurser

1 0.1%

Forholdet tilNATO

1 0.1%

Fornybar energi 1 0.1%

Forskning 1 0.1%

Fortsatt jobbefor demokratiskeverdier

1 0.1%

Page 140: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 140 -

# v085: Most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

Forurensning 1 0.1%

Forvalteoljeformuen

2 0.1%

Forvalteoljeressursenefornuftig

1 0.1%

Forvaltning avressurser

1 0.1%

Framtidiguavhengighet avoljeinntektene

1 0.1%

Framtids 1 0.1%

Fredsavtale 1 0.1%

Fremmedfrykt 1 0.1%

Fullsysselsetting

2 0.1%

FÅ NED FATTIGDOMMENI NORGE

1 0.1%

Få folk ut iarbeid

1 0.1%

Få utinnvandrere

1 0.1%

GJØRE SEGUAVHENNGIGAV OLJEINNTEKTER

1 0.1%

GLOBALISERING 1 0.1%

Gjøre det braetterkommerne

1 0.1%

Godt samfunn iNorge

1 0.1%

HELSEPOLITIKKEN 1 0.1%

Helse 8 0.5%

Helse Norge 1 0.1%

Helse og omsorg 1 0.1%

Helse, sykehus 1 0.1%

Helsepolitikk 3 0.2%

Helsepolitikk -Eldrepolitikk

1 0.1%

Helsereform 1 0.1%

Helsevesen 2 0.1%

Helsevesenet måforbedres

1 0.1%

Holde seg tiltradisjonelfamiliepolitik

1 0.1%

Holdninger tilsjukefravær

1 0.1%

Håndtereeldrebølgen

1 0.1%

INDUSTRIPOLITIKKEN 1 0.1%

Page 141: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 141 -

# v085: Most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

INNVANDRING 1 0.1%

INNVANDRINGSPOLITIKK 1 0.1%

INNVANDRINGSPOLITIKKEN 1 0.1%

Ikke gå konkurs 1 0.1%

Ikke øke antalloffentligearbeidsplasse

1 0.1%

Inntegrering avinnvandrere

1 0.1%

Innvandrerspolitikk 1 0.1%

Innvandring 14 0.8%

Innvandring-Integrering

1 0.1%

Innvandringen 2 0.1%

Innvandringspolitikk 2 0.1%

Innvandringspolitikken 4 0.2%

Int. økononomi 1 0.1%

Integrere vårenye landsmenn

1 0.1%

Invanderpolitikk 1 0.1%

Invandring 1 0.1%

Invandringspolitikk 2 0.1%

Jernbaneutbygging 1 0.1%

KLIMA 3 0.2%

KLIMA OG MILJØPOLITIKKEN 1 0.1%

KLIMAPOLITIKK 1 0.1%

KLIMAPOLITIKKEN 1 0.1%

KLIMAUTFORDRINGEN 2 0.1%

Klima 44 2.5%

Klima og miljø 3 0.2%

Klima, Økonomi 1 0.1%

Klima-miljø 1 0.1%

Klima/miljø 2 0.1%

Klimaendringene 1 0.1%

Klimaendringer 4 0.2%

Klimagasser 1 0.1%

Klimapolitikken 2 0.1%

Klimaproblemer 1 0.1%

Klimaspørsmål 2 0.1%

Klimaspørsmålet 1 0.1%

Klimautfordringen 2 0.1%

Klimautviklingen 1 0.1%

Kllimaforhandlinger 1 0.1%

Kommuneøkonomien,fordårleg

1 0.1%

Page 142: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 142 -

# v085: Most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

Kompetanseutvikling 1 0.1%

Krig/fred 1 0.1%

Krigføring iAfghanistan

1 0.1%

Langsiktigplanlegging ang.innvandring

1 0.1%

Lavarbeidsledighet

1 0.1%

Laverekollektivpriser

1 0.1%

Likeverd 1 0.1%

Likhet for barnnår det gjelderutdannin

1 0.1%

Likhet mellommennesker bl.a.tilbud

1 0.1%

Lønnsveksten 1 0.1%

MILJØ 1 0.1%

MILJØARB. 1 0.1%

MILJØPOLITIKK 1 0.1%

MILJØPOLITIKKEN 1 0.1%

MILJØPROBLEMATIKK 1 0.1%

MILJØSPØRSMÅLET 1 0.1%

Medlem av EU 1 0.1%

Menneskenespsykiske indreliv

1 0.1%

Menneskeverd 1 0.1%

Mer allsidignæringsliv (ikkebare Olje)

1 0.1%

Miljø 56 3.2%

Miljø -Klimaplitikk

1 0.1%

Miljø klima 3 0.2%

Miljø og Klima 1 0.1%

Miljø ogoljeutvinning

1 0.1%

Miljø ogreduksjon avklimagasser

1 0.1%

Miljø/klima 1 0.1%

Miljøet 2 0.1%

Miljøkampen 1 0.1%

Miljøpolitikk 1 0.1%

Miljøspørsmål 2 0.1%

Miljøspørsmålet 2 0.1%

Page 143: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 143 -

# v085: Most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

Miljøutfordingene 1 0.1%

Miljøver 1 0.1%

Miljøvern 5 0.3%

Mot EU 1 0.1%

NAV 1 0.1%

Nasjonaløkonomi

1 0.1%

Norge etter oljen 1 0.1%

Norges rolleinternasjonaltklima

1 0.1%

Nyeoljeressurser

1 0.1%

Næringslivet -arbeidsplasser

1 0.1%

Næringsliveti gang etterfinanskrisen

1 0.1%

Næringsutviklingunntatt olje

1 0.1%

OLJE BORINGI ØOFOTEN

1 0.1%

OPPRETTHOLDESYSSELSETTING

1 0.1%

Olje og gass 1 0.1%

Oljeutvinning 1 0.1%

Oljeutvinning Ja- Nei

1 0.1%

Oljeutvinning ihavområdene

1 0.1%

Oljeutvinning inord

1 0.1%

Oljeutvinning inye områder.

1 0.1%

Oljutvinning 1 0.1%

Opprettholdeolje-gassproduksjon

1 0.1%

Opprettholdesysselsettingen

1 0.1%

Opprettholdevidereutviklevelferdssamfu

1 0.1%

Oppvekst 1 0.1%

Oppvekstmijø 1 0.1%

Overgang tillandbasertverdiskapning

1 0.1%

Overholdeinternasjonaleforpliktelser

1 0.1%

Page 144: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 144 -

# v085: Most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

Pengebruken 1 0.1%

Pengeforvaltning 1 0.1%

Pensjoner 1 0.1%

Pensjonsreformen 1 0.1%

Pleie og omsorgav eldre

1 0.1%

Purealisme,mangfold

1 0.1%

Ramme forvelferdsstaten

1 0.1%

Reduserebyråkrati

1 0.1%

Rehabiliteringav offentligebygg

1 0.1%

Ressursbruk 1 0.1%

Ressursforbruk 1 0.1%

Rovdyrpolitikken 1 0.1%

Rusproblematikk 1 0.1%

Ruste opp aldersog sykehjem

1 0.1%

SAMFERDSEL 1 0.1%

SKOLEPOLITIKKEN 1 0.1%

Samferdsel 3 0.2%

Samferdselspolitikken 1 0.1%

Satse påforskning

1 0.1%

Sikre fremtidensnæringsliv

1 0.1%

Skapeandre typerarbeidsplasser

1 0.1%

Skapeinnovasjon

1 0.1%

Skattepolitikk 1 0.1%

Skattepolitikken 1 0.1%

Skole 3 0.2%

Skole ogutdanning

2 0.1%

Skolen 1 0.1%

Skolepolitikk 1 0.1%

Slutteavkristningen avNorge

1 0.1%

Soldater heimfra Afganistan

1 0.1%

Solidaritet 1 0.1%

Sosialpolitikk 2 0.1%

1 0.1%

Page 145: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 145 -

# v085: Most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

Spille enaktiv rolleinternasjonalt

Styrkearbeidsplasser

1 0.1%

Sunn økonomi 1 0.1%

Sykehusøkonomi 1 0.1%

Sykelønnsordningen.få nedsykefraværet

1 0.1%

Sysselsetting 10 0.6%

SØKE MEDLEMSKAPI EU

1 0.1%

TERROR 1 0.1%

Ta seg avsvake grupper isamfundet

1 0.1%

Ta stillingtil krigen iAfganistan

1 0.1%

Trygdesystemet 1 0.1%

Trygdeutbetalinger 1 0.1%

UTDANNINGSPOLITIKK 1 0.1%

UTDANNINGSPOLITIKKEN 1 0.1%

Unngåarbeidsløyse

1 0.1%

Ut avfinanskrisen/stabilisereøkonomien

1 0.1%

Utbedring avhelsepolitikken

1 0.1%

Utdanning 2 0.1%

Utdanning ogforskning

1 0.1%

Utdanningspolitikk 1 0.1%

Utdanningspolitikken 1 0.1%

Utenrikspolitikk 2 0.1%

Utenrikspoltiskespørsmål

1 0.1%

Utfordringer påskolesektoren

1 0.1%

Utjevning avlevekår

1 0.1%

Utprising 1 0.1%

Utvisning avasylsøkere somer kriminell

1 0.1%

Veiutbygging 1 0.1%

Velferd 1 0.1%

Velferd for alle 1 0.1%

Page 146: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 146 -

# v085: Most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

Velferdsordninger 1 0.1%

Verdigeldreomsorg

1 0.1%

Verdiskapningi Norge i privatsektor

1 0.1%

afganistan,forsvar

1 0.1%

alder forinnbyggerne

1 0.1%

alle i arbeid 1 0.1%

alle i jobb 1 0.1%

alt tiloljeindustrien

1 0.1%

alterativenergikilder

1 0.1%

alternativenergikilder

1 0.1%

alternativinntekter til olje

1 0.1%

alternativeenrgikilder

1 0.1%

annen måtefinne\brukeenergi, andre for

1 0.1%

annen ordningpå integrering avinnvand

1 0.1%

arbeid 3 0.2%

arbeid etter oljen 1 0.1%

arbeid for alle 3 0.2%

arbeid til alle 5 0.3%

arbeide ifremtiden-styrke ind.

1 0.1%

arbeidledighet 1 0.1%

arbeidplassene 1 0.1%

arbeidsinnvandring 1 0.1%

arbeidsledighegt 1 0.1%

arbeidsledighet 14 0.8%

arbeidsledigheten 5 0.3%

arbeidsledighetet 1 0.1%

arbeidslivnæringsliv

1 0.1%

arbeidsløshet 2 0.1%

arbeidsmarkedet 4 0.2%

arbeidsplassene 1 0.1%

arbeidsplasser 5 0.3%

arbeismarkedet 1 0.1%

Page 147: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 147 -

# v085: Most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

arbplasser,samfedsel 1 0.1%

arbspl tryggesgj forståarbstagr-arbgiv

1 0.1%

asylpolitikk 1 0.1%

asylpolitikk-innvandring

1 0.1%

asylpolitikken 2 0.1%

asylsøkarpol 1 0.1%

asylsøkere 1 0.1%

at alle fårnødvendighelsehjelp

1 0.1%

avkrisningaav Norge blirrevasjert

1 0.1%

balanseiregnskap utenoljepenger

1 0.1%

balansen imiljøvern

1 0.1%

balansen olje-natur-pengebruk

1 0.1%

barn og ungdom 1 0.1%

barn ogungdoms arbeid

1 0.1%

barnog ungesoppvekstvilkår

1 0.1%

bedreeldreomsorg

1 0.1%

bedreflerkultureltmiljø i norge

1 0.1%

bedrehelseomsorg ogbarnehager

1 0.1%

bedreinfrastruktur

1 0.1%

bedreintegrering avinnvandrere

1 0.1%

bedre jordbrukspolitikk 1 0.1%

begrensefattigdom iNorge;ik flereinnv

1 0.1%

begrenseinnvandringen

1 0.1%

begrenseutslippet

1 0.1%

beholdearbeidsplassene

1 0.1%

1 0.1%

Page 148: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 148 -

# v085: Most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

beholde dagenslevestandard

beholde levestandardensomidag

1 0.1%

beholdevelferden som idag

1 0.1%

bekjempefattigdom

2 0.1%

bekjempekriminalitet

1 0.1%

belage seg på enannen økonomienn olje

1 0.1%

betre rusomsorgstrengerealkohollover

1 0.1%

bevare nasjonaleegenart

1 0.1%

bevare velferdssamfunnet 1 0.1%

bidra til rettferdi verden

1 0.1%

bistand ogfredsarbeid

1 0.1%

bli medlem aveu

1 0.1%

bli meruavhengig avoljen

1 0.1%

bremsettilgangen tiluføretrygd ogsyke

1 0.1%

bruke velstandfornuftig

1 0.1%

bygge sykehjem/omsorgsboliger

1 0.1%

bygge utinfrastukturen ilandet

1 0.1%

bygge utvindkraft, fornyeseg til beste

1 0.1%

bærekraftignæring

1 0.1%

bærekraftigteknologi

1 0.1%

bærekraftigutvikling- miljø

1 0.1%

bærekraftigutvikling/miljø

1 0.1%

bærekraftigutviling

1 0.1%

1 0.1%

Page 149: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 149 -

# v085: Most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

deltagelseintern.konfl.(vilik.Nor.delt

dempe forbrukog matriellvelstand

1 0.1%

diplomatiskforbinelser

1 0.1%

disponereoljeformuenfornuftig

1 0.1%

distrikt 1 0.1%

distriktspolitikk 1 0.1%

distriktspolitikken 1 0.1%

drive samfunnetpå en fornuftigmåte

1 0.1%

eksempel forandre nasjoner

1 0.1%

eksporten 1 0.1%

elderomsorg 2 0.1%

eldr 1 0.1%

eldre 2 0.1%

eldre bølgen 1 0.1%

eldre og omsorg 1 0.1%

eldre og unge 1 0.1%

eldrebolgen 1 0.1%

eldrebølge 1 0.1%

eldrebølgen 15 0.8%

eldrebørgen 1 0.1%

eldreoms 1 0.1%

eldreomsorg 28 1.6%

eldreomsorgbygga ut sjukeheimsplassar

1 0.1%

eldreomsorg(taimoteldrebølgen)

1 0.1%

eldreomsorg,merutbygging

1 0.1%

eldreomsorgen 13 0.7%

eldreosorg 1 0.1%

eldrepoletikk 1 0.1%

eldrepolitikk 3 0.2%

eldrepolitikken 5 0.3%

eldresaken 1 0.1%

eldromorg 1 0.1%

eldromsorgen 1 0.1%

energi 7 0.4%

Page 150: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 150 -

# v085: Most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

energi, omleggfra olje/gass tilfornyba

1 0.1%

energipolitikk 2 0.1%

energipolitikken 1 0.1%

energispørsmålet 1 0.1%

eu 7 0.4%

eu medlem 1 0.1%

eu saken 1 0.1%

eu-tilknytning 1 0.1%

eusaken 1 0.1%

familie/barnkontraarbeid,bedrebalans

1 0.1%

familiepolitikken 1 0.1%

fange co2 1 0.1%

fascistiskislamisme

1 0.1%

fatigdom 1 0.1%

fattigdom 3 0.2%

fattigdom iNorge

1 0.1%

fattigdompersoner under80000kr

1 0.1%

fattigdomproblamatikk 1 0.1%

fattigdomsspørsmålet

1 0.1%

fattigdomspoitikk 1 0.1%

fattigdomsprobemeti norge

1 0.1%

fattigdomsproblmatikken 1 0.1%

fattiigdom inorge

1 0.1%

fattingdommen 1 0.1%

ffamiliepolitikken 1 0.1%

finan krisen 1 0.1%

finans krisen 2 0.1%

finanskrisa 4 0.2%

finanskrise 2 0.1%

finanskrisen 6 0.3%

finasielle 1 0.1%

finne nyenæringsveier-etter olja tar s

1 0.1%

fiskerinæringa 1 0.1%

fjerne fattigdom 1 0.1%

Page 151: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 151 -

# v085: Most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

flyktningpolitikk

1 0.1%

folk i arbeid 1 0.1%

folvaltning avnaturressurser

1 0.1%

for sterk veksti offentligekostnader

1 0.1%

forbedreinfrastruktur

1 0.1%

forbedre vilkårskole

1 0.1%

forberede segnår oljen tar slutt

1 0.1%

forbrukssamfunnet 1 0.1%

fordeling avressursene

1 0.1%

fordelingspolitikken 1 0.1%

forebyggeulikheter isamfunnet

1 0.1%

forhandler somfredsbevarendenasjon

1 0.1%

forhold til EU 1 0.1%

forhold tileuropa eu

1 0.1%

forhold til miljø 1 0.1%

forholdet tilEuropa

1 0.1%

fornye landet -vekst utvikl

1 0.1%

forsiktighet medvelferd

1 0.1%

forskning 1 0.1%

forskning forå ha noe etteroljen

1 0.1%

forskning fpåfaraday

1 0.1%

forskningutdannelse

1 0.1%

forståelsemellom ulikekulturer

1 0.1%

forsvar 1 0.1%

forsvarspolitikken 1 0.1%

fortsatt ståutenfor EU

1 0.1%

fortsatt væremedlem i FN.

1 0.1%

forurensning 1 0.1%

Page 152: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 152 -

# v085: Most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

forvalte våreressurser

1 0.1%

forvalte våreressurser påriktig måte

1 0.1%

forvaltn. avnaturress.

1 0.1%

forvaltning avressurser

1 0.1%

forvaltning avresursene

1 0.1%

fraflytting frabygdene

1 0.1%

fred 4 0.2%

fred i midtøsten 1 0.1%

fred i verden 1 0.1%

fred og sikkerhet 1 0.1%

fredsarbeid 1 0.1%

fredsarbeidet 1 0.1%

fredskapendearbeid

1 0.1%

fredsskapendepolitikk

1 0.1%

fremtiden for deunge

1 0.1%

full sysselsetjing,løn å greia segmed

1 0.1%

fullsysselsetning

1 0.1%

full sysselsetting 6 0.3%

fungerandesamferdsel,infrastruktur

1 0.1%

fungerndeskolesystem

1 0.1%

få flest mulig iarbeid

1 0.1%

få folk i arbeid 1 0.1%

få integrertallerde loviligeinnvandre

1 0.1%

få nedarbeidsledighetog sykefravær

1 0.1%

få ut invandrerne 1 0.1%

få vekkfattigdommen

1 0.1%

gi til fattige land 1 0.1%

gjøre best muligfor verden

1 0.1%

Page 153: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 153 -

# v085: Most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

globaloppvarming

2 0.1%

globalisering 1 0.1%

globalt ansvar 1 0.1%

god forvaltningav oljefondet

1 0.1%

god økonomistyring

1 0.1%

gode arbforholdfor arb. livet

1 0.1%

gode politikeresom holder hvade lover.

1 0.1%

ha arbeid til folk 1 0.1%

handel medfattige

1 0.1%

helse 11 0.6%

helse ogeldrepolitikk

1 0.1%

helse og omsorg 4 0.2%

helse og omsorgog eldrebølgen

1 0.1%

helse og sosial 1 0.1%

helse og velferd 1 0.1%

helse omsorg 1 0.1%

helse' 1 0.1%

helse, få vekkkøene

1 0.1%

helse/sosial/barnog unge

1 0.1%

helsekøene 1 0.1%

helsepolitikk 1 0.1%

helsepolitikken 1 0.1%

helsesektoren 1 0.1%

helsetjeneste 1 0.1%

helsevesen 3 0.2%

helsevesenet 4 0.2%

henge med i denteknologiskeutv.i verde

1 0.1%

hjelpe andreland

1 0.1%

hold norge fritt 1 0.1%

holde en godøkonomi

1 0.1%

holde ossutenfor EU

1 0.1%

holde på norsketradisjon

1 0.1%

Page 154: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 154 -

# v085: Most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

håndtering avflerkulturellespørsmål

1 0.1%

håndteringav nasjonensøkonomi

1 0.1%

håntere norgesvelstand

1 0.1%

høyere kvalitetpå skolene

1 0.1%

iljø 2 0.1%

importertkriminalitet

1 0.1%

industri 1 0.1%

industri- 1 0.1%

industrialiseringi Norge

1 0.1%

industrielt iverdensmarkedet

1 0.1%

industrien 1 0.1%

industriensbetingelser

1 0.1%

industrikraft fo 1 0.1%

infrastruktur 1 0.1%

inkluderendearbeidsliv, sevedlegg

1 0.1%

inntregeringspolitikken 1 0.1%

innvanding 2 0.1%

innvandr 1 0.1%

innvandr ogflykt

1 0.1%

innvandrere 1 0.1%

innvandrigen 1 0.1%

innvandring 34 1.9%

innvandring ogintegrering

1 0.1%

innvandringstrengere

1 0.1%

innvandring, fåut asylsøkeresom ikke h

1 0.1%

innvandringen 4 0.2%

innvandrings 1 0.1%

innvandringsspørsmål

1 0.1%

innvandrings- 1 0.1%

innvandringspolitikk 7 0.4%

innvandringspolitikken 8 0.5%

innvandringsproblemet 1 0.1%

Page 155: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 155 -

# v085: Most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

innvandringsspørsmålet 1 0.1%

innvanring 1 0.1%

integrere fremmedkulturelle 1 0.1%

integrerering avinnv

1 0.1%

integrering 5 0.3%

integrering avinnvandrere

3 0.2%

integreringspolitikk 1 0.1%

integreringspolitikken 2 0.1%

internasjoanleforpliktelser

1 0.1%

internasjonalengasjemang

1 0.1%

internasjonaltilnerming

1 0.1%

internasjonalvekt av Norge

1 0.1%

internasjonaltsamarbeid

2 0.1%

invandring 2 0.1%

invandringsspørsm

1 0.1%

invandringspol 1 0.1%

invandringspolitikken 2 0.1%

investere ifremtiden nårolkepengene ik

1 0.1%

islamismen 1 0.1%

ivaretademokrati

1 0.1%

jobb til alle 1 0.1%

kamp motnarkotika ogfattigdom

1 0.1%

kampen mot org.kriminalitet

1 0.1%

katastroferinternasjonalt

1 0.1%

kjempe for bedreforh. mot Østen

1 0.1%

klasseskiller 1 0.1%

klima 83 4.7%

klima / natur 1 0.1%

klimainternasjonalekonflikter

1 0.1%

klima miljø 1 0.1%

klima miljøvern 1 0.1%

klima og miljø 7 0.4%

Page 156: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 156 -

# v085: Most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

klima, miljø 1 0.1%

klima,ozonlaget...

1 0.1%

klima,miljø 1 0.1%

klima-energi 1 0.1%

klima/miljø 1 0.1%

klimaendringane 2 0.1%

klimaendringer 3 0.2%

klimaendringerogkonsekvensene

1 0.1%

klimakrisen 2 0.1%

klimapolitikk 4 0.2%

klimapolitikken 2 0.1%

klimaproblem 1 0.1%

klimaproblematikk 1 0.1%

klimaproblematikken 2 0.1%

klimaproblemet 2 0.1%

klimasaken 2 0.1%

klimaspørsmål 3 0.2%

klimaspørsmålet 2 0.1%

klimatrussel 1 0.1%

klimautfordringen 2 0.1%

klimautfordringene 1 0.1%

klimautvikling 1 0.1%

klimna 1 0.1%

kollektiv trafikk 1 0.1%

kommuneøkonomi 1 0.1%

kommunikasjon,samhandel andreland

1 0.1%

konfliktmeklingi krigsområder

1 0.1%

konkurransedyktigindustri

1 0.1%

kontrolereinnvandrin

1 0.1%

kontrollinnvandring

1 0.1%

kontroll over utgi helsevesenet

1 0.1%

krig 1 0.1%

krig i afganistan 1 0.1%

krigen iafganistan

1 0.1%

krigføring iutland fn

1 0.1%

kriminalitet 3 0.2%

Page 157: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 157 -

# v085: Most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

kriminalpolitikk 1 0.1%

kriminalpolitikken 1 0.1%

kristenformålsparagraf- trass innvandr

1 0.1%

kristendommen 1 0.1%

kulturpolitikk 1 0.1%

kyotoavtalen fåi havn

1 0.1%

landbruk 1 0.1%

landet ognærings måutvikles i taktmed

1 0.1%

landets intriitet 1 0.1%

langsiktighetplanlegging

1 0.1%

lavarbeidskledighet

1 0.1%

levedyktigutkant

1 0.1%

likestilling 1 0.1%

likhet isamfunnet

1 0.1%

likhet for alle 1 0.1%

likt samfunntryggeresamfunn

1 0.1%

løse klimautfordringer 1 0.1%

m iljø 1 0.1%

manglendekontroll påinnvandring

1 0.1%

medlem eu 1 0.1%

medlemskap iEU

2 0.1%

menneskerettiheter 1 0.1%

mer letingetter olje inordområdene

1 0.1%

mer ressurser tilpsykiatrien

1 0.1%

mer vekt påforskning

1 0.1%

mest mulig folki arbeid

1 0.1%

midtøsten/israel/palestina

1 0.1%

miljø 108 6.1%

miljø bevarerden jorda vi har

1 0.1%

Page 158: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 158 -

# v085: Most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

miljø klima 1 0.1%

miljø ogforurensing

1 0.1%

miljø og klima 3 0.2%

miljø,innvandring 1 0.1%

miljø. 1 0.1%

miljøet 1 0.1%

miljøkampen 1 0.1%

miljøpolikken 1 0.1%

miljøpolitikken 2 0.1%

miljøproblematikk 1 0.1%

miljøproblemer 1 0.1%

miljøproblemet 1 0.1%

miljøsak,livstilsendring

1 0.1%

miljøsaken 2 0.1%

miljøspørsmål 3 0.2%

miljøspørsmål,klima

1 0.1%

miljøspørsmålet 1 0.1%

miljøutfordringen 1 0.1%

miljøvennligsamfunn

1 0.1%

miljøvern 14 0.8%

miljøvernet, vier en miljøsinke

1 0.1%

milojø 1 0.1%

miløvern 1 0.1%

miløvern klima 1 0.1%

mindreinnvandring

1 0.1%

minimerekriminaliteten

1 0.1%

motstand mot eu 1 0.1%

møljøsprøsmålet 1 0.1%

narkotikabekjempelse 1 0.1%

nasjonalistiskhovmod

1 0.1%

nasjonalitet 1 0.1%

naturressurser 1 0.1%

nei til eu 1 0.1%

nnvandring 1 0.1%

nok arbeidere 1 0.1%

norge er forAmerikavennlig

1 0.1%

1 0.1%

Page 159: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 159 -

# v085: Most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

norge må haselvråderett overhavet sitt

nye muligheterfor inntekter

1 0.1%

nyelandsm.bedrekrav oginkludering

1 0.1%

nytenkningog forskning iindustrien

1 0.1%

næringslivet 2 0.1%

næringsplitikk 1 0.1%

næringsutvikling 2 0.1%

oljealdersslutt,rusteopp forsvaret

1 0.1%

olje og gass 1 0.1%

olje-fiskeri 1 0.1%

olje-oggassutvikling

1 0.1%

oljeboring 1 0.1%

oljefond og etikk 1 0.1%

oljefondet 1 0.1%

oljefondetsplasseringer

1 0.1%

oljefri økonomi 1 0.1%

oljen brukes forfort

1 0.1%

oljepolitikk 2 0.1%

oljeutvinning 1 0.1%

omsorg 2 0.1%

omstilling avnæringslivet

1 0.1%

oppretholdeverdiskapning

1 0.1%

oppretteholdeviderelevestandardsom i

1 0.1%

oppretth.levest.,ytrings-og organis.fri

1 0.1%

opprettholdelevestandard

1 0.1%

opprettholdelevestandardsom idag (god

1 0.1%

opprettholdelevestandarden

1 0.1%

1 0.1%

Page 160: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 160 -

# v085: Most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

opprettholdelevestanderden

opprettholdesysselsetting

1 0.1%

opprettholdevelferden

1 0.1%

opprettholdevelferdsnivået

1 0.1%

opprettholdevelferdsstaten

1 0.1%

opprettholdevelferdstaten

1 0.1%

opprettholde-forbedrelevestandar

1 0.1%

oprethold godtsolidaritets/oppvekstmilj

1 0.1%

oprettholde velferdssamfunnet 1 0.1%

orden påkriminaliteten

1 0.1%

ordnet innvandringspolititikk 1 0.1%

pengebruken 1 0.1%

pengepolitikken 1 0.1%

pensjonsfondet 1 0.1%

pensjonsordning 1 0.1%

privat nettverksbetyding forbeslutning

1 0.1%

prosjektsom samlerbefolkninge;

1 0.1%

psykiatrien 1 0.1%

reddenæringslivet

1 0.1%

redusere antalluføretrygdede

1 0.1%

reduseremuslimskeinnstrømming

1 0.1%

redusereoffentligpengebruk

1 0.1%

redusereoffentlig sektor

1 0.1%

redusertinnvandring

1 0.1%

reduserteoljeintekter

1 0.1%

rensing avklimagassutslipp

1 0.1%

1 0.1%

Page 161: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 161 -

# v085: Most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

ressurser iarkitsk område

ressursforvaltningog fordeling

1 0.1%

ressussfordelingpå vedensbasis

1 0.1%

retteklimautslippa

1 0.1%

rus og narko 1 0.1%

rusomsorgen 1 0.1%

ruste oppskolene

1 0.1%

samferdel 1 0.1%

samferdeselspolitikk 1 0.1%

samferdsel 14 0.8%

samferdsel.infrastruktur 1 0.1%

sammferdsel 1 0.1%

se vedlegg 2 0.1%

selvråderett overnatur ressurser

1 0.1%

selvstendighet 1 0.1%

sikrearbeidsplasser

2 0.1%

sikre fullsysselsetting

2 0.1%

sikrevelferdsstaten ogordningene

1 0.1%

skafffe alternativ næringsvirksomhet 1 0.1%

skapearbeidsplasser

1 0.1%

skapebærekraftigindustri

1 0.1%

skape fred iverden

1 0.1%

skapemiljøvennligearbeidsplasser

1 0.1%

skape trygghet 1 0.1%

skatter ogavgifter

1 0.1%

skole 15 0.8%

skole -forskning 1 0.1%

skole ogutdanning

8 0.5%

skoleløpet ihenhold tiløkonomi

1 0.1%

1 0.1%

Page 162: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 162 -

# v085: Most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

skolens rolle i åutjamne sosisaleforsk

skolepolitikk 5 0.3%

skolepolitikken 1 0.1%

skolesystem 1 0.1%

skolesystemet tilå fungere

1 0.1%

skular 1 0.1%

slutt påkrigføring iAfganistan

1 0.1%

solidaritet 1 0.1%

sosial 1 0.1%

sosial velferd foralle

1 0.1%

sosiale tjenester 1 0.1%

sosiale ulikheter 1 0.1%

stabilearbeidsplasser

1 0.1%

stabilitet 1 0.1%

stabiløkonomi 1 0.1%

status quoe 1 0.1%

stoppeinvandring

1 0.1%

styrke Forsvaret 1 0.1%

styrkearbeidsmoral en

1 0.1%

styrkeeldreomsorgen

1 0.1%

støtte USA ommere fred

1 0.1%

svineinfuensaen 1 0.1%

sykdom globalt 1 0.1%

syselsettning 1 0.1%

sysselsetning 1 0.1%

sysselsetting 18 1.0%

sysselsetting allei arbeid

1 0.1%

sysselsettingfremtidig

1 0.1%

sysselsettinga 1 0.1%

sysselsettning 1 0.1%

ta oss bedre våreegne

1 0.1%

ta vare på deeldre

1 0.1%

ta vare påhverandre

1 0.1%

Page 163: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 163 -

# v085: Most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

ta vare påkristnekulturarven

1 0.1%

ta vare påmiljøet

1 0.1%

ta vare påmiljøet,olje

1 0.1%

ta vare pånasjonensinntektskilder

1 0.1%

ta vare på sinidentitet

1 0.1%

ta vare på sineegne

1 0.1%

ta vare påverdiene vi har,forvaltge de

1 0.1%

teknologi 1 0.1%

terror 1 0.1%

tiden etter olja 1 0.1%

tilrettelegga for industriarbeidsplassar 1 0.1%

tilretteleggingfor funksjonshemmede

1 0.1%

tilrettl.for at folkskaper verdisjøle

1 0.1%

tilslutning til eu 1 0.1%

tirlettelegge fortid etter oljealder

1 0.1%

trekke seg ut avafganistan

1 0.1%

trygdesystemet 1 0.1%

tryggearbeidsplasser

1 0.1%

tryggeressursene

1 0.1%

trygge velferden 1 0.1%

trygt å boher/tryggøkonomi

1 0.1%

uavhengignæringsliv etteroljealderen

1 0.1%

uhjelp 1 0.1%

uhjelpen 1 0.1%

ulandsproblem 1 0.1%

utbygging avforsvaret

1 0.1%

utbygging bedreveier

1 0.1%

1 0.1%

Page 164: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 164 -

# v085: Most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

utdanne å leggetil rette forverdiskapn

utdannelse 1 0.1%

utdanning 12 0.7%

utdanning ogskole

1 0.1%

utdanningspolitikken 2 0.1%

utjevneforskjellende

1 0.1%

utjviklingshjelp 1 0.1%

utnyttelse avressurser

1 0.1%

utryddefattigdom ogulikheter

1 0.1%

uttryggheti forholduregistertinnvandr

1 0.1%

utv. næringslivet 1 0.1%

utvikle alternatieenergiformer

1 0.1%

utvikling avfornybar energi

1 0.1%

utvikling/forskning

1 0.1%

utvinning av nyeoljefeldter

1 0.1%

vedlikeholdelevestandard

1 0.1%

vedlikeholdevelferden

1 0.1%

veibygg 1 0.1%

veier 2 0.1%

veiutbygging 2 0.1%

veiutbygging-samferdsel

1 0.1%

vel fungerendenæringsliv

1 0.1%

velferd 2 0.1%

velferd -arbeidsplasser

1 0.1%

velferd, bra forde svake

1 0.1%

velferdssamf. 1 0.1%

velferdsstaten 1 0.1%

velferspolitkken 1 0.1%

velferssammfundet 1 0.1%

verdensfreden 1 0.1%

Page 165: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 165 -

# v085: Most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

verdiskaping 1 0.1%

verdiskapning 1 0.1%

verdiskapningi landet utenforoljevirks

1 0.1%

verdisynet 1 0.1%

verne omressursene

1 0.1%

vi må holdefred i verden.samarbeid.

1 0.1%

vilkår privatnæringsliv

1 0.1%

visjoner omvelferds staten

1 0.1%

være et riktigforbilde forandre/vi er

1 0.1%

Å utjevnesosialeforskjeller

1 0.1%

ØKONOMIEN 1 0.1%

ØKONOMISKEPOLITIKK

1 0.1%

Økonomi 2 0.1%

Økonomi etterolja

1 0.1%

Økonomiskpolitikk

1 0.1%

Økonomiskstabilitet

1 0.1%

Økonomiskstyring

1 0.1%

Økonomiskvekst

1 0.1%

Økonomiskvelferd

1 0.1%

å beholdearbeidsplasser

1 0.1%

å bevare vårtnorske nasjonalesærpreg

1 0.1%

å håndtereinnvandring påen god måte

1 0.1%

å ikke hvile påvåre laurbær

1 0.1%

å løse arbeidsledighetsprobl 1 0.1%

å ta vare påenekelt personer

1 0.1%

å være fortsatten fredsnasjon

1 0.1%

Page 166: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 166 -

# v085: Most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

økonomi 10 0.6%

økonomi (Verdebsøkonokii Norge)

1 0.1%

økonomi(arbeid/skatt)

1 0.1%

økonomi ogklima i samsvar

1 0.1%

økonomien 3 0.2%

økonomiskansvar formedmennesker

1 0.1%

økonomiskfremtid

1 0.1%

økonomiskoppsving

1 0.1%

økonomiskpolitikk

2 0.1%

økonomisk vekst 1 0.1%

økonomiskepolitikken

1 0.1%

økonomiskesituasjonen

1 0.1%

økt sysselsetting 1 0.1%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v086: Second most important challenge, Norway

Information [Type= discrete] [Format=character] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1587 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Now we turn to a few questions concerning challenges Norway is facing today as a nation. What is in your opinion the mostimportant challenge? And what is the second most important?

... B. Answer 2

Value Label Cases Percentage

"Eldrebølgen" 1 0.1%

''forskjellsnorge'' 1 0.1%

(8) nekter/vilikke svare

4 0.3%

(9) vet ikke 91 5.7%

0 5 0.3%

3.verdenkorrupsjon

1 0.1%

8 1 0.1%

999 1 0.1%

ARBEIDSLEDIGHET 1 0.1%

ARBEIDSLEDIGHETEN 1 0.1%

ARBEIDSLINJEN 1 0.1%

AVGIFTSPOLITIKK 1 0.1%

AVKRISTNINGAV NORGE

1 0.1%

Page 167: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 167 -

# v086: Second most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

Afganistanproblemet 1 0.1%

Arbeid 2 0.1%

Arbeid - arbeidfor alle

1 0.1%

Arbeid for alle 1 0.1%

Arbeid i FN 1 0.1%

Arbeidsledighet 5 0.3%

Arbeidsledigheten 1 0.1%

Arbeidsledihet 1 0.1%

Arbeidsløshet 1 0.1%

Arbeidsløyse 1 0.1%

Arbeidsmarkedet 1 0.1%

Arbeidsplasser 5 0.3%

Asyl 1 0.1%

Asylpolitikken 1 0.1%

Atomkrig 1 0.1%

BEHOLDERØDGRØNNREGJERING

1 0.1%

BEVARE DETSOSIALENETTVERKETVI HAR

1 0.1%

BEVARE LEVESTANDAREN 1 0.1%

BISTAND 1 0.1%

Barn 1 0.1%

Barnepolitikk 1 0.1%

Beholde støtte tilbarnefam/kontantstøtt

1 0.1%

Bekjempefattigdom ogfredsarbeid

1 0.1%

Bekjempekriminalitet

1 0.1%

Bevare industriarb.plasser 1 0.1%

Bevare norskearb.plasser

1 0.1%

Bevarenåværende sykelønnsordning

1 0.1%

Bevaretrygdesystemet

1 0.1%

Bruken avoljefondet

1 0.1%

Byggeopp Norsknæringsliv

1 0.1%

Delta iinternasjo nalekonflikter

1 0.1%

Page 168: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 168 -

# v086: Second most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

Distriktspolitikk 2 0.1%

Dyrs rettigheter 1 0.1%

Dårlig økonomifor skolene

1 0.1%

ELDREBØLGEN 2 0.1%

ELDREOMSORG 2 0.1%

ELDREOMSORGEN 2 0.1%

ELDREOMSORGENOG HELSEPOLITIKKENGENEREL

1 0.1%

EU 2 0.1%

EUSPØRSMÅLET

1 0.1%

EU spørsmålet 1 0.1%

EU-saken 2 0.1%

Eldre 4 0.3%

Eldre/skole 1 0.1%

Eldrebølge 1 0.1%

Eldrebølgen 5 0.3%

Eldreomsorg 15 0.9%

Eldreomsorg ifremtiden

1 0.1%

Eldreomsorg/Arbeidsplasser

1 0.1%

Eldreomsorgen 3 0.2%

Eldrepolitikk 1 0.1%

Energipolitikk 1 0.1%

Energipolitikken 1 0.1%

Etisk og moralskutvikling isamfunnet

1 0.1%

FORUTRENSING 1 0.1%

FREDSARBEIDE 1 0.1%

FREDSKAPENDEARBEIDE

1 0.1%

FREDSSKAPENDEARBEID

1 0.1%

Famile 1 0.1%

Familie 1 0.1%

Familiepolitikk 1 0.1%

Fattidomsbekjempelse

1 0.1%

Fattigdom 2 0.1%

Fattigdom Nansvar f.flyksom rikkt land

1 0.1%

Fattigdom/byutvikling

1 0.1%

Page 169: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 169 -

# v086: Second most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

Fattigdomsbekjempelse 3 0.2%

Finans 1 0.1%

Finanskrisen 1 0.1%

Finanssituasjonen 1 0.1%

Finnankrisen 1 0.1%

Fiskeri 1 0.1%

Fjerning avsykehuskøene

1 0.1%

Forbedreintegreringen

1 0.1%

Fordeling avgoder

1 0.1%

Foreldrekontaktmed barna

1 0.1%

Forhold til andrenasjoner

1 0.1%

Forholdet til EU 1 0.1%

Forskning 5 0.3%

Forskning ogutdanning

1 0.1%

Forsvaret 1 0.1%

Forsvarspolitikken 1 0.1%

Forsvarsstrategi 1 0.1%

Forvalteoljerikdom

1 0.1%

Forvaltning 1 0.1%

Forvaltning avfiskeriressurser

1 0.1%

Forvaltning avnaturressurser

1 0.1%

Forvaltning avoljepenger

1 0.1%

Fredsarbeid 1 0.1%

Fredsarbeidet 1 0.1%

Frihet i pedagogikken.Labarn være barn

1 0.1%

Få bedre styringav+begrenseinvandringa

1 0.1%

Få kontroll overinnvandringen ilandet

1 0.1%

Få ungdom iarbeid.

1 0.1%

Gjøres påmiljøvennligmåte

1 0.1%

Globalematvarekrisa

1 0.1%

1 0.1%

Page 170: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 170 -

# v086: Second most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

Godtinternasjinaltsamarbeide

HELSEPOLITIKK 2 0.1%

HELSEPOLITIKKEN 1 0.1%

HJELPE ULAND INN PÅMARKEDET

1 0.1%

Handel 1 0.1%

Helse 7 0.4%

Helse og omsorg 1 0.1%

Helse og sosial 1 0.1%

Helse, psykiatyri 1 0.1%

Helse/sykehusdrift

1 0.1%

Helsepolitikk 1 0.1%

Helsepolitikkgenerelt

1 0.1%

Helsepolitikken 2 0.1%

Helsesektor 1 0.1%

Helsestell 1 0.1%

Helsevern 1 0.1%

Helsevesen 1 0.1%

Helsevesenet 4 0.3%

Helsevesenet,matkvalitet

1 0.1%

INFRASTRUKTUR 1 0.1%

INNVANDRINGSPOLITIKK 1 0.1%

INNVANDRINGSPOLITIKKEN 1 0.1%

Ikke for høgrente

1 0.1%

Individetsrettigheter vs.felleskapsint

1 0.1%

Industriutbygging 2 0.1%

Infrastruktur 1 0.1%

Infrastuktur 1 0.1%

Innteksutjevning 1 0.1%

Innvandrerpolitikk 1 0.1%

Innvandring 20 1.3%

Innvandring/samferdsel

1 0.1%

Innvandringen 1 0.1%

Innvandringspolitikk 4 0.3%

Innvandringspolitikken 4 0.3%

Innvandringspolitikkenmå skjerpes

1 0.1%

Integrering 2 0.1%

Page 171: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 171 -

# v086: Second most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

Integrering avinnvandrere

1 0.1%

Integreringinvandrere

1 0.1%

Internesj.engagement

1 0.1%

Interrnasjonaltsamarbeid

1 0.1%

Invandrerpolitikk 1 0.1%

Invandringspolikken 1 0.1%

Invandringspolitikk 2 0.1%

Ivaretainternasjonaleforpliktingar

1 0.1%

KLIMA 1 0.1%

KLIMA OGMILJØ

1 0.1%

KLIMAET 1 0.1%

Klima 11 0.7%

Klima ogmiljøpolitikken

1 0.1%

Klima/miljø 1 0.1%

Klimapolitikken 1 0.1%

Klimasituasjonen 1 0.1%

Klimaspørsmålet' 1 0.1%

Kommunalfattigdom

1 0.1%

Kompetanseutvikling/utdanning

1 0.1%

Kriminalitet 1 0.1%

Kriminalitet,transp.,veisystem 1 0.1%

Kriminalpolitikk 1 0.1%

Kriminalpolitikken 1 0.1%

Kulturpolitikk 1 0.1%

Landbassertøkonomi

1 0.1%

Langsiktigtransport forbåde gods og pe

1 0.1%

Lavere skatter 1 0.1%

Levekår 1 0.1%

Likestilling 1 0.1%

Lønninger 1 0.1%

Løsgjengersituasjoneni byene

1 0.1%

Mer forarbeidsledige

1 0.1%

1 0.1%

Page 172: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 172 -

# v086: Second most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

Merrettferdighet

Militærpolitikk 1 0.1%

Miljø 27 1.7%

Miljø/klima 1 0.1%

Miljøet påjorden

1 0.1%

Miljøkampen 1 0.1%

Miljørettssikkerhet 1 0.1%

Miljøsaken 1 0.1%

Miljøvern 3 0.2%

Mindre ulikhetmellom rike ogfattie

1 0.1%

Mindre utsleppmiljø

1 0.1%

Muligheten tilarbeid

1 0.1%

MÅ hakristendom

1 0.1%

NYFORNYBARENERGI

1 0.1%

Nei til EU 1 0.1%

Norge i krig 1 0.1%

Norges forholdtil EU

1 0.1%

Norges rollei utenlandskekonfliktområd

1 0.1%

Næring 1 0.1%

Næringsutvikling 2 0.1%

OPPRETHOLDEVELFERDSTATEN

1 0.1%

Olje 1 0.1%

Olje/miljøvern 1 0.1%

Oljeboring 1 0.1%

Oljeformuen 1 0.1%

Oljeleting i Nord 1 0.1%

Oljepolitikk 1 0.1%

Oljeutvinning 2 0.1%

Oljeutvinningnordpå, lofoten

1 0.1%

Omlegging avøkonomi

1 0.1%

Opprettholdesysselsetting

1 0.1%

Opprettholdelseav dagenslevestandard

1 0.1%

Page 173: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 173 -

# v086: Second most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

Opprettsholdelseav velferdsstaten

1 0.1%

Oppvekst 1 0.1%

Oprettholdearbeidsplasser

1 0.1%

Oprettholdenæringsgrunnlaetter olje

1 0.1%

Overgang tillandbasertindustri

1 0.1%

Pensjonsordningen 1 0.1%

Pleie og omsorg 1 0.1%

Privat ogoffentlig forbruk

1 0.1%

Rammebetingelserfor fiskeriene

1 0.1%

Redsuserehelsekøer

1 0.1%

Rekruttering avarbeidskraft

1 0.1%

Ressursforvaltning 1 0.1%

Resursutvikling 1 0.1%

Rettferdiginntektsfordeling

1 0.1%

SAMFERDSEL 1 0.1%

SKOLE 2 0.1%

SKOLEPOLITIKK 1 0.1%

Samarbeid klima 1 0.1%

Samferdsel 8 0.5%

Samferdsel,Veier ogjernbane måutbedrs

1 0.1%

Samferdselsutbygging 1 0.1%

Sikrearbeidsplasser

1 0.1%

Sikre nåværende pensjonsordninger 1 0.1%

Skaffe militæretil oppdrag iutlandet

1 0.1%

Skapearbeidsplasser

1 0.1%

Skatt 1 0.1%

Skikkeligstyring påoljefondet

1 0.1%

Skole 7 0.4%

Skole ogutdanning

3 0.2%

Skole/Eldre 1 0.1%

Page 174: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 174 -

# v086: Second most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

Skole/utdanning 1 0.1%

Skolen 1 0.1%

Skolepolitikk 1 0.1%

Skolepolitikken 1 0.1%

Skolepolitikkenmå tas tak i

1 0.1%

Solidaritet isamfunnet

1 0.1%

Sosialeordninger

1 0.1%

Statligsentralisering

1 0.1%

Store økning avflyktninger

1 0.1%

Strengerejustisvesen

1 0.1%

Styrke ogutforskningforskning

1 0.1%

Sykefravær 1 0.1%

Sykehusøkonomi 1 0.1%

Sysselseting 1 0.1%

Sysselsetting 11 0.7%

Sørge for Statenikke blir større

1 0.1%

TANORDNORGEMER PÅALVOR

1 0.1%

Teknologi 1 0.1%

Tilrettelegge forprivatindustrien

1 0.1%

Toleranse 1 0.1%

Trafikk 1 0.1%

Trosfrihet 1 0.1%

Trygdeordningen 1 0.1%

Trygder forbruk 1 0.1%

Trygdestørrelsenpå attføring

1 0.1%

Tryggearbeidsmarkedet

1 0.1%

U-hjelp 1 0.1%

UHJELPSPOLITIKK 1 0.1%

UTDANNING 1 0.1%

UTVIKLINGSARBEID 1 0.1%

Uhjelp 1 0.1%

Undervisning oghelse

1 0.1%

1 0.1%

Page 175: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 175 -

# v086: Second most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

Ungeuføretrygdede

Ustabil økonomi 1 0.1%

Utdanning 8 0.5%

Utdanningspolitikk 2 0.1%

Utdanningssystemetmå forbedres

1 0.1%

Utenriks 1 0.1%

Utenrikspolitikk 1 0.1%

Utenrikspolitikken 1 0.1%

Utenrikspolitikken/menneskeverdi

1 0.1%

Utviklelandbasertøkonomi

1 0.1%

Utvikle norsknæringsliv ogarbeidstaker

1 0.1%

Utvise personeruten lovligopphold

1 0.1%

Vegutbygging 1 0.1%

Veiutbygging 1 0.1%

Velfedsspørsmål 1 0.1%

Velferd 2 0.1%

Vettugtutd.systemgrunnskole-forskning

1 0.1%

Voldskriminalitetenøker

1 0.1%

afganistan 2 0.1%

alders ogsykehjem

1 0.1%

alle har hva detrenger

1 0.1%

ansvarsbevisstoverfor andreland

1 0.1%

arb.ledighet 1 0.1%

arbeid 6 0.4%

arbeid for alle 1 0.1%

arbeid for alle. 1 0.1%

arbeid ogutdanning

1 0.1%

arbeid og velferd 1 0.1%

arbeid til all 1 0.1%

arbeid til alle 4 0.3%

arbeid til flestmulig

1 0.1%

Page 176: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 176 -

# v086: Second most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

arbeid tilfolket.stabil øk

1 0.1%

arbeidledighet 1 0.1%

arbeidliv, nokarbeid til alle

1 0.1%

arbeidskraft 1 0.1%

arbeidsledigeht 1 0.1%

arbeidsledighet 7 0.4%

arbeidsledigheten 2 0.1%

arbeidslivet 1 0.1%

arbeidsløshet 2 0.1%

arbeidsmuligheter 1 0.1%

arbeidspl 1 0.1%

arbeidsplasser 7 0.4%

arbeidsproblematikk 1 0.1%

arbeidssituasjonen,skapearbeidsplasser

1 0.1%

arbeispolitikk 1 0.1%

arbidsliv 1 0.1%

asyl og integreringspolitikken 1 0.1%

asylpoletikken 1 0.1%

asylpolitikken 1 0.1%

at Norge fortsatter et kristentland.

1 0.1%

at Norge står sammen,solidaritet 1 0.1%

at de ikke blirmed i eu

1 0.1%

at folk hararbeid

1 0.1%

at vi ikkemå brukekjernekraftverk

1 0.1%

avbyråkratisere 1 0.1%

avgift 1 0.1%

avgifter 1 0.1%

avkristning 1 0.1%

bander ifraøstblokklandene

1 0.1%

barn og familie 1 0.1%

barn og unge 1 0.1%

barn-og ungdomutdanning

1 0.1%

barn/ungdom 1 0.1%

barne og ungdomspoletikk 1 0.1%

barne og unge 1 0.1%

barneomsorg 1 0.1%

Page 177: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 177 -

# v086: Second most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

barns fattigdom 1 0.1%

bedre rammebetingelser 1 0.1%

bedre helsevesen 1 0.1%

bedrekoll.trafikk

1 0.1%

bedre skole 1 0.1%

bedre veier 1 0.1%

bedreveistandarden

1 0.1%

bedreintegreringav innvandrere

1 0.1%

bedriftene 1 0.1%

begrenseinnvandring

1 0.1%

begrenseinnvandringen

1 0.1%

begrense ogfå kontroll påinnvandring

1 0.1%

begrensninginnvandring

1 0.1%

beholdedemokratiet

1 0.1%

beholdelandbruket som idag eller bedre

1 0.1%

bekjempfattigdom

1 0.1%

bekjempearb.ledighet

1 0.1%

bekjempefattigdom

1 0.1%

bekjempe krig 1 0.1%

bekjempelse avfattigdom

1 0.1%

betre politi ogrettsves,lov ogorden me

1 0.1%

bevare de sosialegodene

1 0.1%

bevarelikhetskulturen

1 0.1%

bevareproduktiviteten

1 0.1%

bevare velferdssamfunnet 1 0.1%

bevarevelferdstaten

1 0.1%

bevegesle avfolkemasser fraland til al

1 0.1%

bistand tiltrengende land

1 0.1%

Page 178: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 178 -

# v086: Second most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

bistandshjelp 1 0.1%

bolig 1 0.1%

bosettingsmønster 1 0.1%

bremse forbruk inflasdjonsbremsing 1 0.1%

bruk av forsvareti utlandene

1 0.1%

bruk avoljepenger

1 0.1%

bruke oljef tilinvestering inorgee

1 0.1%

bygge infastruktur forfrentiden

1 0.1%

bygge oppforsvaret

1 0.1%

bygge utForsvaret

1 0.1%

bygge ut banerog veier

1 0.1%

bærekraftigøkonomi

2 0.1%

deltainternasjonalt

1 0.1%

distrikspolitkk 1 0.1%

distriktspolitikk 2 0.1%

effektiviteti offentligforvaltning

1 0.1%

eldre 5 0.3%

eldre bølgen 1 0.1%

eldrebølgen 14 0.9%

eldrebølgenkansje

1 0.1%

eldreomsorg 40 2.5%

eldreomsorg ifremtiden

1 0.1%

eldreomsorg ogbarneomsorg

1 0.1%

eldreomsorg omnoen år

1 0.1%

eldreomsorg,familiepoliotikk

1 0.1%

eldreomsorgen 17 1.1%

eldrepolitikk 8 0.5%

eldreproblematikkne 1 0.1%

en godeldreomsorg

1 0.1%

en annenintergrering avinvandrere

1 0.1%

Page 179: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 179 -

# v086: Second most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

endretskolepolitikk

1 0.1%

energi 3 0.2%

energispørsmål 1 0.1%

energitilgongpå sikt,haldasysselsetjin

1 0.1%

engasjementetg iAfganistan

1 0.1%

er norge virkeligverdens besteland å b

1 0.1%

erstatteoljeintekter

1 0.1%

eu 2 0.1%

eu saken 1 0.1%

eu spørsmålet 1 0.1%

eu-medlemskap 1 0.1%

eu-spørsmålet 1 0.1%

fattidommennarkosaken

1 0.1%

fattidomsbekjempelse 1 0.1%

fattig og rik,nordsør

1 0.1%

fattigdom 9 0.6%

fattigdom blantunge

1 0.1%

fattigdom oglike muligheter

1 0.1%

fattigdombekjempelse 1 0.1%

fattigdommen 1 0.1%

fattigdomsforkjempelse 1 0.1%

fattigdomspolitikken 1 0.1%

fattiges kår 1 0.1%

fattighjelp 1 0.1%

fattigpolitikken 1 0.1%

finansekrisen 1 0.1%

finanskrisa 1 0.1%

finanskrisen 7 0.4%

finanskrisenshåndering

1 0.1%

finansspørsmålet 1 0.1%

finne nyeenergiformer

1 0.1%

fiskeri 2 0.1%

fiskeripolitikken 1 0.1%

fjerne fattigdom 1 0.1%

1 0.1%

Page 180: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 180 -

# v086: Second most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

flerkulturelleNorge

flest mulig ijobb

1 0.1%

flyktningepolitikken 1 0.1%

folk betaler formye skatt

1 0.1%

forbedreoffentlige tilbud

1 0.1%

forbedre skolen 1 0.1%

forbedrethelsevesen

1 0.1%

forbedringav skole og utdanningssystemt

1 0.1%

fordeling avrikdommen

1 0.1%

fordeling avsamfunnsgoder

1 0.1%

fordeling avsosiale goder

1 0.1%

fordelingmellom fattigeog rike land

1 0.1%

fordelingspolitikk 1 0.1%

foredeling 1 0.1%

forhold tilenergifremtid

1 0.1%

forhold tilutviklingsland

1 0.1%

forholdet til EU 1 0.1%

fornybarenergi 1 0.1%

fornying avenergi

1 0.1%

forskning 3 0.2%

forskningutdanning

1 0.1%

forskning-nyutdanning

1 0.1%

forsning på nynteknologi

1 0.1%

forsvar 2 0.1%

forsvaret 4 0.3%

forsvaret byggeopp

1 0.1%

forsvaret legetime interese inord områ

1 0.1%

forsvarlig ressuresforvaltningtil havs

1 0.1%

1 0.1%

Page 181: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 181 -

# v086: Second most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

forsvarligøkonmiskpolitikk

forsvarspolitikken 1 0.1%

forsvarsspørsmål 1 0.1%

fortsatt væremedlem i Nato.

1 0.1%

forurensing 1 0.1%

forvalting avresurser

1 0.1%

forvaltning avoljeformuen

1 0.1%

forvaltning avoljeformuen

1 0.1%

forvaltning avoljepengene

1 0.1%

fred 1 0.1%

fred og sikkerhet 2 0.1%

fredsbevarandearbeid

1 0.1%

fredsbevarendearbeid

1 0.1%

fredsmekling 1 0.1%

fremtidigeinntekter nåroljen er slutt

1 0.1%

fremtissammfunnet 1 0.1%

fri flyt iarbeidsmaredet

1 0.1%

full sysselsetjing 1 0.1%

full sysselsetting 1 0.1%

få bedre veierinfrastrukturtenke langs

1 0.1%

få et godtskolesystem

1 0.1%

få flere i arb,også syke oguføre

1 0.1%

få mennesker tilå engasjere seg

1 0.1%

få nedbilavgifterog verne omfossefall

1 0.1%

få på plassøkonomien igjen

1 0.1%

få tilbake kristnegrunnverdier

1 0.1%

få trygdebrukereut i jobb

1 0.1%

1 0.1%

Page 182: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 182 -

# v086: Second most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

generellfattigdom

gi familien tid tilbarna

1 0.1%

gis tøtte til desom trenger og

1 0.1%

globaloppvarming

1 0.1%

globalisering 2 0.1%

god forvaltning 1 0.1%

godt samrbeidmellom landene

1 0.1%

godt tilbud tileldre og syke

1 0.1%

ha ein god skule 1 0.1%

handel medutlandetkonkuransekraft

1 0.1%

handelspolitikken 1 0.1%

hels 1 0.1%

helse 29 1.8%

helse / sykehus 1 0.1%

helse ogeldreomsorg

1 0.1%

helse ogeldreomsorgen

1 0.1%

helse ogeldreomsrog

1 0.1%

helse og omsorg 1 0.1%

helse og penger 1 0.1%

helse og sosial 1 0.1%

helse og soslial 1 0.1%

helse og velferd 1 0.1%

helse sykehusomsorg

1 0.1%

helsevaksinasjon aidsverdensproblem

1 0.1%

helse økomomi ikommuner

1 0.1%

helse,eldreomsorg 1 0.1%

helse- og sosial 1 0.1%

helse- omsorg 1 0.1%

helse-sosialpolitikk

1 0.1%

helse-eldreomsorg

1 0.1%

helse/eldreomsorg

1 0.1%

1 0.1%

Page 183: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 183 -

# v086: Second most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

helse/eldreomsorg/skole

helse/omsorg 1 0.1%

helsekabalen, sevedlegg

1 0.1%

helsekøene 1 0.1%

helsepol 1 0.1%

helsepolitikk 7 0.4%

helsepolitikk forbarn

1 0.1%

helsepolitikken 3 0.2%

helsepolitikken,sykehuskøane

1 0.1%

helsesektor 1 0.1%

helsespørsmål 2 0.1%

helsesystemet 1 0.1%

helsevesen 2 0.1%

helsevesenet 3 0.2%

helsevesenetutbygging

1 0.1%

helsevesnet 2 0.1%

helspolitikk 1 0.1%

heve oppklaringsprosenteni straffesaker

1 0.1%

hjelp de svake 1 0.1%

hjelp til u-land 1 0.1%

holde arbeidsledighetennede

1 0.1%

holde segnøytrale,ikkedelta i AFganist

1 0.1%

holdesysselsettingenoppe

1 0.1%

holdevelferdsstatenvedlikev/eldrebølg

1 0.1%

holdningeroverforinvandrere

1 0.1%

humanitæresaker

1 0.1%

hva man skalleve av etteroljen er slut

1 0.1%

håndtere det åstå utenfor EU

1 0.1%

høgt prisnivå forturister.for dyrt

1 0.1%

Page 184: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 184 -

# v086: Second most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

høyereutdanning

1 0.1%

id løse asylsøkee 1 0.1%

ikke med i EU 1 0.1%

ikke norskesoldater utenfornorge

1 0.1%

industri 1 0.1%

industrilandbasert

1 0.1%

industriutbygging 1 0.1%

infrastruktur 1 0.1%

infrastruktur/veier

1 0.1%

inndustri 1 0.1%

inntregeringspolitikkde vet ikkehvorda

1 0.1%

innvamdring 1 0.1%

innvandirngspolitikken 1 0.1%

innvandrer 1 0.1%

innvandrerpolitikk 1 0.1%

innvandrin g 1 0.1%

innvandring 35 2.2%

innvandring,strammere 1 0.1%

innvandring/inntregering

1 0.1%

innvandringa 1 0.1%

innvandringen 1 0.1%

innvandringpoletikk 1 0.1%

innvandringspoitikk 1 0.1%

innvandringspol 1 0.1%

innvandringspolitikk 3 0.2%

innvandringspolitikken 12 0.8%

innvendring 1 0.1%

integrasjon 1 0.1%

integrere deinnvand. som eri Norge

1 0.1%

integrering 2 0.1%

integrering avinnvandrere

1 0.1%

integreringinnvandrere

1 0.1%

intektsutjevning 1 0.1%

intergreringenav innvandrere

1 0.1%

intergreringspolitikken 1 0.1%

Page 185: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 185 -

# v086: Second most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

internasjonalsamarbeid

1 0.1%

internasjonaltsamarb.

1 0.1%

internasjonaltsamarbeid

2 0.1%

internasjonaltsamarbeid,sysselsetting

1 0.1%

internasonalsikkerhet

1 0.1%

intregnering 1 0.1%

invandring 2 0.1%

invandringspolitikken 1 0.1%

invandringssituasjonen 1 0.1%

itegrering 1 0.1%

ivaretar demenneskeligeressurser i sam

1 0.1%

kamp forytringsfrihet

1 0.1%

klilma-miljø 1 0.1%

klima 29 1.8%

klima -miljøendringer

1 0.1%

klima miljø 1 0.1%

klima og miljø 1 0.1%

klima ogsamferdsel

1 0.1%

klima-og miljø 1 0.1%

klimapol 1 0.1%

klimaproblem 3 0.2%

klimasaken 1 0.1%

klimatrusselen 1 0.1%

klimautfordringe 1 0.1%

klimautfordringene 1 0.1%

klimma probl. 1 0.1%

kollektivtransport

2 0.1%

kollektivtrafikk 1 0.1%

kollektivtrafikken 1 0.1%

kommunalesjølvstyre blirbedre

1 0.1%

kommunestrukturen 1 0.1%

kommuneøkonomi 1 0.1%

kommunikasjon 1 0.1%

kommuniksajon 1 0.1%

Page 186: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 186 -

# v086: Second most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

kompetanse 1 0.1%

konkurranseevnenei industgri

1 0.1%

konkurransekraft 1 0.1%

konkurransekraften 1 0.1%

konsuprisindeksen 1 0.1%

kontroll påinnvandring

1 0.1%

koordinertoljeproduksjon

1 0.1%

krig 1 0.1%

kriminalitet 1 0.1%

kriminaliteten 1 0.1%

kriminalpolitikk 1 0.1%

kristendom 1 0.1%

kultur 2 0.1%

kunnskap 1 0.1%

kvinnerettigheterinternasj

1 0.1%

lage godeprosseser forflerkultyrelt sa

1 0.1%

landbrukspolitikken 1 0.1%

lav rente 1 0.1%

levestandaren 1 0.1%

lik levestandard 1 0.1%

lik lønn for liktarbeid

1 0.1%

like muligheterfor alle

1 0.1%

like rettigheterfor alle

1 0.1%

likeløn 1 0.1%

likestilling,likelønn

1 0.1%

livskvaLITET 1 0.1%

lærerutdanningen 1 0.1%

lønnsforskjeller 1 0.1%

lønnsommebedrifter

1 0.1%

mangel påarbeidskraft

1 0.1%

megle iinternasjonalkonflikter

1 0.1%

menneskerettighetene 1 0.1%

mer arbeidskraft 1 0.1%

mer politi,kriminalitet

1 0.1%

Page 187: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 187 -

# v086: Second most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

mer sosialrettferdighetnasjonalt og in

1 0.1%

mer til helse 1 0.1%

mere kristeligeverdier

1 0.1%

meremiljøvennligetiltak

1 0.1%

miljø 65 4.1%

miljø klima 1 0.1%

miljø, ta var påfauna/liv

1 0.1%

miljø-klima 1 0.1%

miljø/klima 1 0.1%

miljø/klima-utfordringen

1 0.1%

miljøet 2 0.1%

miljøpolitikk 1 0.1%

miljøpolitikken 4 0.3%

miljøpolitikkenpå dagsordeninternasjon

1 0.1%

miljøproblematikken 1 0.1%

miljøsprørsmål 1 0.1%

miljøspørsmål 3 0.2%

miljøvern 5 0.3%

miløpolitik 1 0.1%

mindre avhengigav olje og gass

1 0.1%

minimere antallinnvandrere

1 0.1%

minske arbeidsledigheten 1 0.1%

mot krig iafganistan

1 0.1%

naturvern 1 0.1%

nedleggelser avskoler etc.

1 0.1%

nn 1 0.1%

norges plass iverden

1 0.1%

norsk asyl og innvandiringspolitikk 1 0.1%

ny forsning 1 0.1%

nytenking a 1 0.1%

nyttig realforskning

1 0.1%

næringslivspolitikk 1 0.1%

næringspol 1 0.1%

næringsutvikling 1 0.1%

Page 188: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 188 -

# v086: Second most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

nødhjelp/utvikling avfattige land

1 0.1%

olje 1 0.1%

olje betyr formye iforhold tilBNP tota

1 0.1%

olje/gassletingeni norge

1 0.1%

oljen i lofoten 1 0.1%

oljepolitikk 1 0.1%

oljeutvinning 4 0.3%

oljeutvinningspolitikk 1 0.1%

omsorg 1 0.1%

omsorgen foreldre

1 0.1%

oppgraderelærerenesprestisje mhpressu

1 0.1%

oppreth. godsosial/helse/rettstandard

1 0.1%

opprettenæringslivet

1 0.1%

opprettholdedrift/bosetting ihele land

1 0.1%

opprettholdelevestandarden

1 0.1%

opprettholdesykehus

1 0.1%

opprettholdesysselsetting

1 0.1%

opprettholdevelferd

1 0.1%

opprettholdevelferden

1 0.1%

opprettholdevelferdsstaten

1 0.1%

opprettholdevelfrerdstaten

1 0.1%

opprettholde-forsterkepensjonsreform

1 0.1%

pensjon ifmeldrebølgen

1 0.1%

pensjoner 1 0.1%

pleie og omsorg 1 0.1%

pleie og omsrog 1 0.1%

privatisering 1 0.1%

1 0.1%

Page 189: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 189 -

# v086: Second most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

prøve å hjelpeandre land idemokratisk

psykisk helse 1 0.1%

psykiskhelsevern

1 0.1%

rasisme/globalisering

1 0.1%

redusere arbeidsledigheten 1 0.1%

redusere avgifter 1 0.1%

redusereinnvandringen

1 0.1%

redusertmiljøutslipp

1 0.1%

redusert vekst ioff budsj

1 0.1%

regjeringsskifte 1 0.1%

rentenivået 1 0.1%

rentepolitikk(må settes opp)

1 0.1%

rettferdigfordeling

1 0.1%

rettferdigfordeling avgoder

1 0.1%

rettsapparatet 1 0.1%

riktigere innvandringspolitikk 1 0.1%

rusomsorgen 1 0.1%

ruste opphelse-Norge

1 0.1%

samarbeid inordområdene

1 0.1%

samarbeidsprosjektmed andreland,olje

1 0.1%

samferdsel 42 2.6%

samferdselspolitikk 2 0.1%

samferdsle 1 0.1%

samfersel 2 0.1%

satse mer pålandbasertindustri/ny tekn

1 0.1%

satsing påforskning ogutvikling

1 0.1%

se vedlegg 1 0.1%

selvstendigheti forhold tilinnvandring

1 0.1%

1 0.1%

Page 190: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 190 -

# v086: Second most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

sikrearbeidsplasseneog få nye

sikre en stabiløknomi i landet

1 0.1%

skape nyearbeidsplasser

1 0.1%

skatt 2 0.1%

skatteavgifter-for høye

1 0.1%

skatte ogavgiftpol.

1 0.1%

skatter og avifter 1 0.1%

skole 26 1.6%

skole / helse 1 0.1%

skole /utdanning/forskning

1 0.1%

skole og eldre 1 0.1%

skole ogopplæring

1 0.1%

skole ogutdannelse

1 0.1%

skole ogutdanning

10 0.6%

skole og utdanningssystemet 1 0.1%

skole utdanning 1 0.1%

skole/utdannelse 1 0.1%

skole/utdanning 3 0.2%

skolen 3 0.2%

skolepolitikk 8 0.5%

skolepolitikken 1 0.1%

skoler 1 0.1%

skolevesenet 1 0.1%

skule 1 0.1%

solidaritet 1 0.1%

solidartet 1 0.1%

sosialrettferdighet

1 0.1%

sosialpolitikk 1 0.1%

sosialt ansvar ialle lag

1 0.1%

stabil kronekurs 1 0.1%

stabil rente,valutta

1 0.1%

stenge grensenefor banditter

1 0.1%

stimulereverdiskapning

1 0.1%

Page 191: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 191 -

# v086: Second most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

stoggeforferdeleginnvandring

1 0.1%

stoppeinnvandrng

1 0.1%

styreoljeutviklingenog drifteoljhefon

1 0.1%

styrke familiepolitikkenog familien som

1 0.1%

styrkegrunnskolen

1 0.1%

styrkerdistriktene

1 0.1%

styrketeldreomsorg

1 0.1%

styrket forsvar 1 0.1%

svineinfluensa 1 0.1%

sykehus 4 0.3%

sysselsetjing 1 0.1%

sysselsetting 12 0.8%

sysselsettning 1 0.1%

sørge forbeholde arb pl eri norge ikke

1 0.1%

ta bedre vare påskolene våre

1 0.1%

ta vare barn ogunge og braskoler

1 0.1%

ta varebefolkningen,generelt

1 0.1%

ta vare påbarna,varmskolemat bl.a.

1 0.1%

ta vare påinnbyggerene

1 0.1%

ta vare på miljø 1 0.1%

ta vare påsosiale gode ogvidereutvikle

1 0.1%

ta vare påspråket sitt

1 0.1%

tar tak iinneffektiviteten

1 0.1%

terrorisme 1 0.1%

trafikksikkerhet 1 0.1%

transport ogveiutbygging

1 0.1%

1 0.1%

Page 192: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 192 -

# v086: Second most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

troverdighet ipolitikk

trygd: uføre,arbeidsløysesjuketrygd

1 0.1%

trygde oguføremisbruk

1 0.1%

trygdesystemetvårt

1 0.1%

trygdevesnetoppe å gå

1 0.1%

trygg økonmi 1 0.1%

tryggheit forinbyggere

1 0.1%

trygghet 2 0.1%

trykt og godtsamfunn for alle

1 0.1%

u-hjelp 3 0.2%

udannelse ogforskning

1 0.1%

udtanning 1 0.1%

uhjelp 1 0.1%

ulovliginnvandring

1 0.1%

undersvisning /skole

1 0.1%

utdanning 14 0.9%

utdanning dedårligste blirpriotert

1 0.1%

utdanning foralle

1 0.1%

utdanning ogtrydesystemet

1 0.1%

utdanning økekvalitet

1 0.1%

utdannings-systemet

1 0.1%

utdanningspolitikk 1 0.1%

utenriks-fredelignasjon sett fraverden

1 0.1%

utenrikspolitikk 1 0.1%

utenrikspolitikken 2 0.1%

utgjevne sosialeforskjeller

1 0.1%

utjamning 1 0.1%

utjevningmellom fattig ogrik

1 0.1%

1 0.1%

Page 193: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 193 -

# v086: Second most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

utjevningøkonomiskeforskjellerglobalt

utkantane måstyrkes

1 0.1%

utnytte ressurserpå en bedre måte

1 0.1%

utvikling 1 0.1%

utviklinginnenteknologi-energi

1 0.1%

utvinning avresurser påbærekraftig måt

1 0.1%

valutakrisen 1 0.1%

vegar 1 0.1%

vei og samband 1 0.1%

vei samferdsel 1 0.1%

veier 1 0.1%

veinett somfungerer

1 0.1%

veiutbygging 1 0.1%

veksten aveldre ogeldreomsorgen

1 0.1%

veldferd 1 0.1%

velferd 2 0.1%

velferdsstaten 1 0.1%

verdensfreden 1 0.1%

verdiskapning 1 0.1%

vern fremforgrådighet

1 0.1%

vindkraft 1 0.1%

være nøytral 1 0.1%

Økonomi 4 0.3%

Økonomiskbistand

1 0.1%

å opprettholdevelferdsnivået

1 0.1%

å styrkefamiliene

1 0.1%

åpne grenser formye

1 0.1%

åpne universitet-forskning mbefolkning

1 0.1%

øke statusen iomsorgsyrket

1 0.1%

øke ytelse tileldre -sosiale

1 0.1%

Page 194: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 194 -

# v086: Second most important challenge, Norway

Value Label Cases Percentage

økendekriminalitet

1 0.1%

økonomi 13 0.8%

økonomi -verdiskapning iframtiden

1 0.1%

økonomi/arbeidsløshet

1 0.1%

økonomien 1 0.1%

økonomikontroll 1 0.1%

økonomiskpolitikk

1 0.1%

økonomisksamarbeid

1 0.1%

økonomiskstabilitet

2 0.1%

økonomiskeforskjeller

1 0.1%

økonomistyring 1 0.1%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v087: Party best - handling the most important challenge

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-99] [Missing=*/30/98/99]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1400 /-] [Invalid=382 /-]

Literal question If you think about the most important challenge: Which party do you think handles it the best?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Red/Red Electoral Alliance 6 0.4%

2 Socialist Left Party (SV) 237 16.9%

3 Labour Party (DnA) 476 34.0%

4 Liberal Party (V) 103 7.4%

5 Christian People's Party (KrF) 57 4.1%

6 Center Party (Sp) 54 3.9%

7 Conservative Party (H) 270 19.3%

8 Progress Party (FrP) 190 13.6%

9 Other parties 7 0.5%

30 No parties (30) 156

98 Won't answer 0

99 Don't know 82Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v088: Party best - handling the second most important challenge

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-99] [Missing=*/30/98/99]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1309 /-] [Invalid=473 /-]

Literal question If you think about the second most important challenge: Which party do you think handles it the best?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Red/Red Electoral Alliance 14 1.1%

2 Socialist Left Party (SV) 157 12.0%

Page 195: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 195 -

# v088: Party best - handling the second most important challenge

Value Label Cases Percentage

3 Labour Party (DnA) 461 35.2%

4 Liberal Party (V) 77 5.9%

5 Christian People's Party (KrF) 47 3.6%

6 Center Party (Sp) 61 4.7%

7 Conservative Party (H) 294 22.5%

8 Progress Party (FrP) 194 14.8%

9 Other parties 4 0.3%

30 No parties (30) 147

98 Won't answer 0

99 Don't know 87Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v089: Attitude towards abortion

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Now we turn to the abortion debate. We have summed up a few different points of view that are expressed in this debate.Which of these statements corresponds the most with your own opinion?

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Use card 10.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Abortion should never be permitted. 25 1.4%

2 Abortion should only be permitted if the woman's life or health isendangered.

206 11.6%

3 Abortion should also be permitted if the woman's personalcircumstances would make it very

318 17.8%

4 Self-determined abortion 1213 68.1%

8 Won't answer 6 0.3%

9 Don't know 14 0.8%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v090: Accept bigger differences in wage levels

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question We have some more statements. We will continue to use the answer alternatives: strongly agree, agree somewhat, disagreesomewhat and strongly disagree. Would you please tell me which of the answers you choose for each statement I read you?

... A. To exhort people to greater effort, we should be willing to accept bigger differences in wage levels.

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Use card 1.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Strongly agree 226 12.7%

2 Agree somewhat 449 25.2%

3 Yes and no 120 6.7%

4 Disagree somewhat 570 32.0%

5 Strongly disagree 405 22.7%

8 Won't answer 5 0.3%

9 Don't know 7 0.4%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

Page 196: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 196 -

# v091: First and foremost provide jobs for Norwegians

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question We have some more statements. We will continue to use the answer alternatives: strongly agree, agree somewhat, disagreesomewhat and strongly disagree. Would you please tell me which of the answers you choose for each statement I read you?

... B. When times are bad, we should first and foremost provide jobs for Norwegians.

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Use card 1.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Strongly agree 458 25.7%

2 Agree somewhat 460 25.8%

3 Yes and no 78 4.4%

4 Disagree somewhat 488 27.4%

5 Strongly disagree 278 15.6%

8 Won't answer 7 0.4%

9 Don't know 13 0.7%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v092: Should allow commercial private schools

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question We have some more statements. We will continue to use the answer alternatives: strongly agree, agree somewhat, disagreesomewhat and strongly disagree. Would you please tell me which of the answers you choose for each statement I read you?

... C. We should allow commercial private schools.

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Use card 1.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Strongly agree 398 22.3%

2 Agree somewhat 546 30.6%

3 Yes and no 78 4.4%

4 Disagree somewhat 382 21.4%

5 Strongly disagree 352 19.8%

8 Won't answer 5 0.3%

9 Don't know 21 1.2%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v093: Rather develop public services than to reduce taxation

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question We have some more statements. We will continue to use the answer alternatives: strongly agree, agree somewhat, disagreesomewhat and strongly disagree. Would you please tell me which of the answers you choose for each statement I read you?

... D. It is more important to develop public services than to reduce taxation.

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Use card 1.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Strongly agree 715 40.1%

2 Agree somewhat 566 31.8%

3 Yes and no 104 5.8%

Page 197: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 197 -

# v093: Rather develop public services than to reduce taxation

Value Label Cases Percentage

4 Disagree somewhat 256 14.4%

5 Strongly disagree 115 6.5%

8 Won't answer 6 0.3%

9 Don't know 20 1.1%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v094: Build gasworks even though CO2 cleaning won't be possible

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question We have some more statements. We will continue to use the answer alternatives: strongly agree, agree somewhat, disagreesomewhat and strongly disagree. Would you please tell me which of the answers you choose for each statement I read you?

... E. We should build gasworks even though CO2 cleaning won't be possible with today's technology.

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Use card 1.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Strongly agree 210 11.8%

2 Agree somewhat 351 19.7%

3 Yes and no 91 5.1%

4 Disagree somewhat 592 33.2%

5 Strongly disagree 482 27.0%

8 Won't answer 7 0.4%

9 Don't know 49 2.7%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v095: Immigrants should have the same rights to social benefits

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question We have some more statements. We will continue to use the answer alternatives: strongly agree, agree somewhat, disagreesomewhat and strongly disagree. Would you please tell me which of the answers you choose for each statement I read you?

... F. Refugees and immigrants should have the same rights to social benefits from the state as Norwegians even though theyare not Norwegian citizens.

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Use card 1.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Strongly agree 343 19.2%

2 Agree somewhat 517 29.0%

3 Yes and no 95 5.3%

4 Disagree somewhat 440 24.7%

5 Strongly disagree 360 20.2%

8 Won't answer 6 0.3%

9 Don't know 21 1.2%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v096: Politicians don't understand the country side in Norway.

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question

Page 198: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 198 -

# v096: Politicians don't understand the country side in Norway.

We have some more statements. We will continue to use the answer alternatives: strongly agree, agree somewhat, disagreesomewhat and strongly disagree. Would you please tell me which of the answers you choose for each statement I read you?

... G. Politicians and bureaucrats in Oslo don't understand what's really going on in the country side in Norway.

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Use card 1.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Strongly agree 531 29.8%

2 Agree somewhat 710 39.8%

3 Yes and no 129 7.2%

4 Disagree somewhat 299 16.8%

5 Strongly disagree 58 3.3%

8 Won't answer 6 0.3%

9 Don't know 49 2.7%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v097: It is important that we sign international agreements

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question We have some more statements. We will continue to use the answer alternatives: strongly agree, agree somewhat, disagreesomewhat and strongly disagree. Would you please tell me which of the answers you choose for each statement I read you?

... H. It is important that we sign international agreements even if that limits norwegian authorities' freedom of action

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Use card 1.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Strongly agree 292 16.4%

2 Agree somewhat 692 38.8%

3 Yes and no 164 9.2%

4 Disagree somewhat 411 23.1%

5 Strongly disagree 157 8.8%

8 Won't answer 7 0.4%

9 Don't know 59 3.3%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v098: Importance of who's in power

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Some people say it makes a big difference who is in power. Others say that it doesn't make any difference who is in power.Using a scale ranging from 1 to 5, where one means that it makes a big difference who is in power and 5 means that it doesn'tmake any difference who is in power. Where would you place yourself?

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Use card 11.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 1. It makes a big difference who is in power 579 32.5%

2 2. 581 32.6%

3 3. 362 20.3%

4 4. 173 9.7%

5 5. It doesn't make any difference who is in power 73 4.1%

Page 199: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 199 -

# v098: Importance of who's in power

Value Label Cases Percentage

8 Won't answer 6 0.3%

9 Don't know 8 0.4%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v099: Importance of who people vote for

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Some people say that no matter who people vote for, it won't make any difference to what happens. Others say that whopeople vote for can make a big difference to what happens. Using a scale ranging from 1 to 5, where 1 means that votingwon't make any difference to what happens and 5 means that voting can make a big difference, where would you placeyourself?

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Use card 12.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 1.Who people vote for won't make any difference 66 3.7%

2 2. 102 5.7%

3 3. 268 15.0%

4 4. 610 34.2%

5 5. Who people vote for can make a big difference 721 40.5%

8 Won't answer 7 0.4%

9 Don't know 8 0.4%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v100: Any party that represents R's views

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Would you say that any of the parties in Norway represents your views reasonably well?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 1484 83.3%

2 No 275 15.4%

8 Won't answer 3 0.2%

9 Don't know 20 1.1%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

Page 200: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 200 -

# v101: Which party R's views best

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-99] [Missing=*/30/98/99]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1470 /-] [Invalid=312 /-]

Literal question Which party represents your views best?

Interviewer's instructions If answered 'yes' in spm32.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Red/Red Electoral Alliance 11 0.8%

2 Socialist Left Party (SV) 120 8.2%

3 Labour Party (DnA) 536 36.6%

4 Liberal Party (V) 84 5.7%

5 Christian People's Party (KrF) 77 5.3%

6 Center Party (Sp) 87 5.9%

7 Conservative Party (H) 302 20.6%

8 Progress Party (FrP) 244 16.6%

9 Other parties 5 0.3%

30 No parties (30) 0

98 Won't answer 10

99 Don't know 4Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v102: Specified

Information [Type= discrete] [Format=character] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=5 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Specify which other party you have in mind.

Value Label Cases Percentage

Miljøpartiet DeGrønne

1 20.0%

de fleste 1 20.0%

kristentsamlingsparti,ny fre

1 20.0%

kystpartiet 1 20.0%

miljøpartiet degrønne

1 20.0%

Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v103: Any party leader that represents R's view

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Regardless of how you feel about the parties, would you say any of the individual party leaders represents your viewsreasonably well?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 1307 73.3%

2 No 438 24.6%

8 Won't answer 5 0.3%

9 Don't know 32 1.8%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

Page 201: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 201 -

# v104: The party leader that represents R's views best

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-99] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1307 /-] [Invalid=475 /-]

Literal question Which party leader represents your views best?

Interviewer's instructions If answered 'yes' in spm33.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Kristin Halvorsen 120 9.2%

2 Jens Stoltenberg 480 36.7%

3 Lars Sponheim 50 3.8%

4 Liv Signe Navarsete 47 3.6%

5 Dagfinn Høybråten 47 3.6%

6 Erna Solberg 281 21.5%

7 Siv Jensen 238 18.2%

8 Torstein Dahle 7 0.5%

9 Annen, spesifiser 9 0.7%

30 Noone/no (30) 15 1.1%

98 Won't answer 8 0.6%

99 Don't know 5 0.4%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v105: Specify

Information [Type= discrete] [Format=character] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=9 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Specify which other party leader you have in mind.

Value Label Cases Percentage

Dørum 1 11.1%

Erik Solheim 1 11.1%

Per KristianFoss

1 11.1%

Sondre ? 1 11.1%

Trine SkeiGrande

1 11.1%

c i hagen 1 11.1%

carl i hagen 1 11.1%

per k foss 2 22.2%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v106: How good or bad a job has the government done

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question The last four years we have had a government consisting og the Labour Party, the Socialist Left Party and the Center Party.How good or bad a job do you think it has done? Has it done a…

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Very good job 116 6.5%

2 Good job 1102 61.8%

3 Both good and bad job 310 17.4%

Page 202: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 202 -

# v106: How good or bad a job has the government done

Value Label Cases Percentage

4 Bad job 201 11.3%

5 Very bad job 40 2.2%

8 Won't answer 5 0.3%

9 Don't know 8 0.4%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v107: Appreciation of Christian Democratic Party

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 0-10] [Missing=*/96/98/99]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1743 /-] [Invalid=39 /-]

Literal question I would now like to know what you think of each of the political parties. After I have read the name of a political partywould you please rate it on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 means that you strongly dislike that party and 10 meansthat you strongly like that party.

... A. Where would you place Christian people's party (Krf) on this scale?

Interviewer's instructions Personal interviews: Use card 13.The order of the parties is rotated.

Value Label Cases Percentage

0 0. Strongly dislike 100 5.7%

1 1. 111 6.4%

2 2. 211 12.1%

3 3. 321 18.4%

4 4. 292 16.8%

5 5. 347 19.9%

6 6. 147 8.4%

7 7. 101 5.8%

8 8. 68 3.9%

9 9. 28 1.6%

10 10. Strongly like 17 1.0%

96 96. Never heard of 2

98 Won't answer 8

99 Don't know 29Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v108: Appreciation of the Liberal Party

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 0-10] [Missing=*/96/98/99]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1726 /-] [Invalid=56 /-]

Literal question I would now like to know what you think of each of the political parties. After I have read the name of a political partywould you please rate it on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 means that you strongly dislike that party and 10 meansthat you strongly like that party.

... B. Where would you place Liberal party (V) on this scale?

Interviewer's instructions Personal interviews: Use card 13.The order of the parties is rotated.

Value Label Cases Percentage

0 0. Strongly dislike 76 4.4%

1 1. 75 4.3%

2 2. 161 9.3%

Page 203: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 203 -

# v108: Appreciation of the Liberal Party

Value Label Cases Percentage

3 3. 224 13.0%

4 4. 274 15.9%

5 5. 395 22.9%

6 6. 212 12.3%

7 7. 150 8.7%

8 8. 103 6.0%

9 9. 40 2.3%

10 10. Strongly like 16 0.9%

96 96. Never heard of 2

98 Won't answer 9

99 Don't know 45Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v109: Appreciation of the Center Party

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 0-10] [Missing=*/96/98/99]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1732 /-] [Invalid=50 /-]

Literal question I would now like to know what you think of each of the political parties. After I have read the name of a political partywould you please rate it on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 means that you strongly dislike that party and 10 meansthat you strongly like that party.

... C. Where would you place Center party (SP) on this scale?

Interviewer's instructions Personal interviews: Use card 13.The order of the parties is rotated.

Value Label Cases Percentage

0 0. Strongly dislike 41 2.4%

1 1. 47 2.7%

2 2. 95 5.5%

3 3. 225 13.0%

4 4. 291 16.8%

5 5. 446 25.8%

6 6. 254 14.7%

7 7. 180 10.4%

8 8. 108 6.2%

9 9. 27 1.6%

10 10. Strongly like 18 1.0%

96 96. Never heard of 2

98 Won't answer 8

99 Don't know 40Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v110: Appreciation of the Socialist Left Party

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 0-10] [Missing=*/96/98/99]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1736 /-] [Invalid=46 /-]

Literal question I would now like to know what you think of each of the political parties. After I have read the name of a political partywould you please rate it on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 means that you strongly dislike that party and 10 meansthat you strongly like that party.

Page 204: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 204 -

# v110: Appreciation of the Socialist Left Party

... D. Where would you place Social left party (SV) on this scale?

Interviewer's instructions Personal interviews: Use card 13.The order of the parties is rotated.

Value Label Cases Percentage

0 0. Strongly dislike 137 7.9%

1 1. 118 6.8%

2 2. 172 9.9%

3 3. 236 13.6%

4 4. 214 12.3%

5 5. 267 15.4%

6 6. 178 10.3%

7 7. 173 10.0%

8 8. 145 8.4%

9 9. 62 3.6%

10 10. Strongly like 34 2.0%

96 96. Never heard of 2

98 Won't answer 8

99 Don't know 36Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v111: Appreciation of the Conservative Party

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 0-10] [Missing=*/96/98/99]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1740 /-] [Invalid=42 /-]

Literal question I would now like to know what you think of each of the political parties. After I have read the name of a political partywould you please rate it on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 means that you strongly dislike that party and 10 meansthat you strongly like that party.

... E. Where would you place Conservative party (H) on this scale?

Interviewer's instructions Personal interviews: Use card 13.The order of the parties is rotated.

Value Label Cases Percentage

0 0. Strongly dislike 23 1.3%

1 1. 20 1.1%

2 2. 72 4.1%

3 3. 178 10.2%

4 4. 199 11.4%

5 5. 314 18.0%

6 6. 235 13.5%

7 7. 247 14.2%

8 8. 274 15.7%

9 9. 114 6.6%

10 10. Strongly like 64 3.7%

96 96. Never heard of 2

98 Won't answer 8

99 Don't know 32Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

Page 205: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 205 -

# v112: Appreciation of the Labour Party

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 0-10] [Missing=*/96/98/99]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1748 /-] [Invalid=34 /-]

Literal question I would now like to know what you think of each of the political parties. After I have read the name of a political partywould you please rate it on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 means that you strongly dislike that party and 10 meansthat you strongly like that party.

... F. Where would you place Labour party (DNA) on this scale?

Interviewer's instructions Personal interviews: Use card 13.The order of the parties is rotated.

Value Label Cases Percentage

0 0. Strongly dislike 25 1.4%

1 1. 29 1.7%

2 2. 34 1.9%

3 3. 76 4.3%

4 4. 129 7.4%

5 5. 289 16.5%

6 6. 234 13.4%

7 7. 292 16.7%

8 8. 338 19.3%

9 9. 186 10.6%

10 10. Strongly like 116 6.6%

96 96. Never heard of 2

98 Won't answer 8

99 Don't know 24Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v113: Appreciation of the Progress Party

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 0-10] [Missing=*/96/98/99]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1747 /-] [Invalid=35 /-]

Literal question I would now like to know what you think of each of the political parties. After I have read the name of a political partywould you please rate it on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 means that you strongly dislike that party and 10 meansthat you strongly like that party.

... G. Where would you place Progress party (FRP) on this scale?

Interviewer's instructions Personal interviews: Use card 13.The order of the parties is rotated.

Value Label Cases Percentage

0 0. Strongly dislike 304 17.4%

1 1. 184 10.5%

2 2. 190 10.9%

3 3. 164 9.4%

4 4. 132 7.6%

5 5. 144 8.2%

6 6. 129 7.4%

7 7. 149 8.5%

8 8. 172 9.8%

9 9. 77 4.4%

Page 206: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 206 -

# v113: Appreciation of the Progress Party

Value Label Cases Percentage

10 10. Strongly like 102 5.8%

96 96. Never heard of 3

98 Won't answer 9

99 Don't know 23Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v114: Appreciation of the Red Electoral Alliance

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 0-10] [Missing=*/96/98/99]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1688 /-] [Invalid=94 /-]

Literal question I would now like to know what you think of each of the political parties. After I have read the name of a political partywould you please rate it on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 means that you strongly dislike that party and 10 meansthat you strongly like that party.

... H. Where would you place Red electoral alliance (RV) on this scale?

Interviewer's instructions Personal interviews: Use card 13.The order of the parties is rotated.

Value Label Cases Percentage

0 0. Strongly dislike 433 25.7%

1 1. 264 15.6%

2 2. 285 16.9%

3 3. 199 11.8%

4 4. 131 7.8%

5 5. 179 10.6%

6 6. 74 4.4%

7 7. 54 3.2%

8 8. 37 2.2%

9 9. 19 1.1%

10 10. Strongly like 13 0.8%

96 96. Never heard of 17

98 Won't answer 9

99 Don't know 68Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v115: Like/dislike: Dagfinn Høybråten

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 0-99] [Missing=*/96/98/99]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1727 /-] [Invalid=55 /-]

Pre-question I would now like to know to what extent you like or dislike some of our political leaders.

Literal question After I have read you the name of a political leader, would you please rate him or her on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, where0 means that you strongly dislike that politician, and 10 means that you like the politician very much.

... A. Where would you place Dagfinn Høybråten on this scale?

Post-question If I should mention a politician you have not heard of, or you feel that you don't have enough knowledge about, please sayso.

Interviewer's instructions Personal interviews: Use card 13.The order of the parties is rotated.

Value Label Cases Percentage

0 0. Strongly dislike 110 6.4%

Page 207: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 207 -

# v115: Like/dislike: Dagfinn Høybråten

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 1. 101 5.8%

2 2. 212 12.3%

3 3. 306 17.7%

4 4. 302 17.5%

5 5. 330 19.1%

6 6. 172 10.0%

7 7. 105 6.1%

8 8. 51 3.0%

9 9. 23 1.3%

10 10. Strongly like 15 0.9%

96 96. Never heard of 10

98 Won't answer 7

99 Don't know 38Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v116: Like/dislike: Lars Sponheim

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 0-99] [Missing=*/96/98/99]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1731 /-] [Invalid=51 /-]

Pre-question I would now like to know to what extent you like or dislike some of our political leaders.

Literal question After I have read you the name of a political leader, would you please rate him or her on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, where0 means that you strongly dislike that politician, and 10 means that you like the politician very much.

... B. Where would you place Lars Sponheim on this scale?

Post-question If I should mention a politician you have not heard of, or you feel that you don't have enough knowledge about, please sayso.

Interviewer's instructions Personal interviews: Use card 13.The order of the parties is rotated.

Value Label Cases Percentage

0 0. Strongly dislike 100 5.8%

1 1. 84 4.9%

2 2. 169 9.8%

3 3. 204 11.8%

4 4. 231 13.3%

5 5. 341 19.7%

6 6. 240 13.9%

7 7. 179 10.3%

8 8. 116 6.7%

9 9. 45 2.6%

10 10. Strongly like 22 1.3%

96 96. Never heard of 7

98 Won't answer 7

99 Don't know 37Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v117: Like/dislike: Liv Signe Navarsete

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 0-99] [Missing=*/96/98/99]

Page 208: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 208 -

# v117: Like/dislike: Liv Signe Navarsete

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1683 /-] [Invalid=99 /-]

Pre-question I would now like to know to what extent you like or dislike some of our political leaders.

Literal question After I have read you the name of a political leader, would you please rate him or her on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, where0 means that you strongly dislike that politician, and 10 means that you like the politician very much.

... C. Where would you place Liv Signe Navarsete on this scale?

Post-question If I should mention a politician you have not heard of, or you feel that you don't have enough knowledge about, please sayso.

Interviewer's instructions Personal interviews: Use card 13.The order of the parties is rotated.

Value Label Cases Percentage

0 0. Strongly dislike 46 2.7%

1 1. 42 2.5%

2 2. 63 3.7%

3 3. 161 9.6%

4 4. 247 14.7%

5 5. 428 25.4%

6 6. 294 17.5%

7 7. 215 12.8%

8 8. 132 7.8%

9 9. 29 1.7%

10 10. Strongly like 26 1.5%

96 96. Never heard of 46

98 Won't answer 7

99 Don't know 46Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v118: Like/dislike: Kristin Halvorsen

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 0-99] [Missing=*/96/98/99]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1746 /-] [Invalid=36 /-]

Pre-question I would now like to know to what extent you like or dislike some of our political leaders.

Literal question After I have read you the name of a political leader, would you please rate him or her on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, where0 means that you strongly dislike that politician, and 10 means that you like the politician very much.

... D. Where would you place Kristin Halvorsen on this scale?

Post-question If I should mention a politician you have not heard of, or you feel that you don't have enough knowledge about, please sayso.

Interviewer's instructions Personal interviews: Use card 13.The order of the parties is rotated.

Value Label Cases Percentage

0 0. Strongly dislike 98 5.6%

1 1. 62 3.6%

2 2. 125 7.2%

3 3. 165 9.5%

4 4. 239 13.7%

5 5. 287 16.4%

Page 209: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 209 -

# v118: Like/dislike: Kristin Halvorsen

Value Label Cases Percentage

6 6. 231 13.2%

7 7. 221 12.7%

8 8. 175 10.0%

9 9. 91 5.2%

10 10. Strongly like 52 3.0%

96 96. Never heard of 5

98 Won't answer 6

99 Don't know 25Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v119: Like/dislike: Erna Solberg

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 0-99] [Missing=*/96/98/99]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1748 /-] [Invalid=34 /-]

Pre-question I would now like to know to what extent you like or dislike some of our political leaders.

Literal question After I have read you the name of a political leader, would you please rate him or her on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, where0 means that you strongly dislike that politician, and 10 means that you like the politician very much.

... E. Where would you place Erna Solberg on this scale?

Post-question If I should mention a politician you have not heard of, or you feel that you don't have enough knowledge about, please sayso.

Interviewer's instructions Personal interviews: Use card 13.The order of the parties is rotated.

Value Label Cases Percentage

0 0. Strongly dislike 27 1.5%

1 1. 27 1.5%

2 2. 50 2.9%

3 3. 116 6.6%

4 4. 193 11.0%

5 5. 336 19.2%

6 6. 256 14.6%

7 7. 283 16.2%

8 8. 297 17.0%

9 9. 104 5.9%

10 10. Strongly like 59 3.4%

96 96. Never heard of 3

98 Won't answer 7

99 Don't know 24Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v120: Like/dislike: Siv Jensen

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 0-99] [Missing=*/96/98/99]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1751 /-] [Invalid=31 /-]

Pre-question I would now like to know to what extent you like or dislike some of our political leaders.

Literal question After I have read you the name of a political leader, would you please rate him or her on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, where0 means that you strongly dislike that politician, and 10 means that you like the politician very much.

... F. Where would you place Siv Jensen on this scale?

Page 210: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 210 -

# v120: Like/dislike: Siv Jensen

Post-question If I should mention a politician you have not heard of, or you feel that you don't have enough knowledge about, please sayso.

Interviewer's instructions Personal interviews: Use card 13.The order of the parties is rotated.

Value Label Cases Percentage

0 0. Strongly dislike 214 12.2%

1 1. 165 9.4%

2 2. 185 10.6%

3 3. 163 9.3%

4 4. 168 9.6%

5 5. 192 11.0%

6 6. 152 8.7%

7 7. 164 9.4%

8 8. 159 9.1%

9 9. 100 5.7%

10 10. Strongly like 89 5.1%

96 96. Never heard of 3

98 Won't answer 7

99 Don't know 21Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v121: Like/dislike: Torstein Dahle

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 0-99] [Missing=*/96/98/99]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1399 /-] [Invalid=383 /-]

Pre-question I would now like to know to what extent you like or dislike some of our political leaders.

Literal question After I have read you the name of a political leader, would you please rate him or her on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, where0 means that you strongly dislike that politician, and 10 means that you like the politician very much.

... G. Where would you place Torstein Dahle on this scale?

Post-question If I should mention a politician you have not heard of, or you feel that you don't have enough knowledge about, please sayso.

Interviewer's instructions Personal interviews: Use card 13.The order of the parties is rotated.

Value Label Cases Percentage

0 0. Strongly dislike 217 15.5%

1 1. 168 12.0%

2 2. 212 15.2%

3 3. 186 13.3%

4 4. 196 14.0%

5 5. 217 15.5%

6 6. 74 5.3%

7 7. 62 4.4%

8 8. 32 2.3%

9 9. 25 1.8%

10 10. Strongly like 10 0.7%

96 96. Never heard of 258

Page 211: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 211 -

# v121: Like/dislike: Torstein Dahle

Value Label Cases Percentage

98 Won't answer 8

99 Don't know 117Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v122: Like/dislike: Jens Stoltenberg

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 0-99] [Missing=*/96/98/99]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1754 /-] [Invalid=28 /-]

Pre-question I would now like to know to what extent you like or dislike some of our political leaders.

Literal question After I have read you the name of a political leader, would you please rate him or her on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, where0 means that you strongly dislike that politician, and 10 means that you like the politician very much.

... H. Where would you place Jens Stoltenberg on this scale?

Post-question If I should mention a politician you have not heard of, or you feel that you don't have enough knowledge about, please sayso.

Interviewer's instructions Personal interviews: Use card 13.The order of the parties is rotated.

Value Label Cases Percentage

0 0. Strongly dislike 28 1.6%

1 1. 17 1.0%

2 2. 36 2.1%

3 3. 56 3.2%

4 4. 106 6.0%

5 5. 220 12.5%

6 6. 175 10.0%

7 7. 307 17.5%

8 8. 398 22.7%

9 9. 266 15.2%

10 10. Strongly like 145 8.3%

96 96. Never heard of 3

98 Won't answer 7

99 Don't know 18Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v123: Center party (SP)

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 0-99] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question In politics people sometimes talk of left and right. Where would you place the different parties on a scale ranging from 0 to10 where 0 is the left side and 10 is the right side?

... A. Center party (SP)

Interviewer's instructions Personal interviews: Use card 14.The order of the parties is rotated.

Value Label Cases Percentage

0 0. Left side 13 0.7%

1 1. 17 1.0%

2 2. 78 4.4%

Page 212: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 212 -

# v123: Center party (SP)

Value Label Cases Percentage

3 3. 211 11.8%

4 4. 483 27.1%

5 5. 616 34.6%

6 6. 196 11.0%

7 7. 58 3.3%

8 8. 14 0.8%

9 9. 6 0.3%

10 10. Right side 4 0.2%

96 96. Never heard of 1 0.1%

98 Won't answer 12 0.7%

99 Don't know 73 4.1%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v124: Progress party (FRP)

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 0-99] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question In politics people sometimes talk of left and right. Where would you place the different parties on a scale ranging from 0 to10 where 0 is the left side and 10 is the right side?

... B. Progress party (FRP)

Interviewer's instructions Personal interviews: Use card 14.The order of the parties is rotated.

Value Label Cases Percentage

0 0. Left side 4 0.2%

1 1. 4 0.2%

2 2. 10 0.6%

3 3. 19 1.1%

4 4. 30 1.7%

5 5. 72 4.0%

6 6. 63 3.5%

7 7. 114 6.4%

8 8. 239 13.4%

9 9. 406 22.8%

10 10. Right side 740 41.5%

96 96. Never heard of 0

98 Won't answer 12 0.7%

99 Don't know 69 3.9%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v125: Liberal party (V)

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 0-99] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question In politics people sometimes talk of left and right. Where would you place the different parties on a scale ranging from 0 to10 where 0 is the left side and 10 is the right side?

... C. Liberal party (V)

Interviewer's instructions Personal interviews: Use card 14.

Page 213: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 213 -

# v125: Liberal party (V)

The order of the parties is rotated.

Value Label Cases Percentage

0 0. Left side 72 4.0%

1 1. 79 4.4%

2 2. 136 7.6%

3 3. 161 9.0%

4 4. 249 14.0%

5 5. 476 26.7%

6 6. 321 18.0%

7 7. 164 9.2%

8 8. 29 1.6%

9 9. 3 0.2%

10 10. Right side 5 0.3%

96 96. Never heard of 1 0.1%

98 Won't answer 12 0.7%

99 Don't know 74 4.2%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v126: Labour party (DNA)

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 0-99] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question In politics people sometimes talk of left and right. Where would you place the different parties on a scale ranging from 0 to10 where 0 is the left side and 10 is the right side?

... D. Labour party (DNA)

Interviewer's instructions Personal interviews: Use card 14.The order of the parties is rotated.

Value Label Cases Percentage

0 0. Left side 30 1.7%

1 1. 57 3.2%

2 2. 179 10.0%

3 3. 302 16.9%

4 4. 389 21.8%

5 5. 423 23.7%

6 6. 194 10.9%

7 7. 77 4.3%

8 8. 41 2.3%

9 9. 7 0.4%

10 10. Right side 7 0.4%

96 96. Never heard of 0

98 Won't answer 12 0.7%

99 Don't know 64 3.6%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v127: Conservative party (H)

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 0-99] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Page 214: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 214 -

# v127: Conservative party (H)

Literal question In politics people sometimes talk of left and right. Where would you place the different parties on a scale ranging from 0 to10 where 0 is the left side and 10 is the right side?

... E. Conservative party (H)

Interviewer's instructions Personal interviews: Use card 14.The order of the parties is rotated.

Value Label Cases Percentage

0 0. Left side 4 0.2%

1 1. 0

2 2. 4 0.2%

3 3. 14 0.8%

4 4. 16 0.9%

5 5. 51 2.9%

6 6. 119 6.7%

7 7. 327 18.4%

8 8. 583 32.7%

9 9. 375 21.0%

10 10. Right side 208 11.7%

96 96. Never heard of 0

98 Won't answer 12 0.7%

99 Don't know 69 3.9%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v128: Christian people's party (KRF)

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 0-99] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question In politics people sometimes talk of left and right. Where would you place the different parties on a scale ranging from 0 to10 where 0 is the left side and 10 is the right side?

... F. Christian people's party (KRF)

Interviewer's instructions Personal interviews: Use card 14.The order of the parties is rotated.

Value Label Cases Percentage

0 0. Left side 8 0.4%

1 1. 11 0.6%

2 2. 29 1.6%

3 3. 67 3.8%

4 4. 136 7.6%

5 5. 435 24.4%

6 6. 439 24.6%

7 7. 389 21.8%

8 8. 135 7.6%

9 9. 29 1.6%

10 10. Right side 15 0.8%

96 96. Never heard of 0

98 Won't answer 12 0.7%

Page 215: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 215 -

# v128: Christian people's party (KRF)

Value Label Cases Percentage

99 Don't know 77 4.3%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v129: Social left party (SV)

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 0-99] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question In politics people sometimes talk of left and right. Where would you place the different parties on a scale ranging from 0 to10 where 0 is the left side and 10 is the right side?

... G. Social left party (SV)

Interviewer's instructions Personal interviews: Use card 14.The order of the parties is rotated.

Value Label Cases Percentage

0 0. Left side 111 6.2%

1 1. 302 16.9%

2 2. 527 29.6%

3 3. 415 23.3%

4 4. 193 10.8%

5 5. 97 5.4%

6 6. 31 1.7%

7 7. 10 0.6%

8 8. 7 0.4%

9 9. 3 0.2%

10 10. Right side 3 0.2%

96 96. Never heard of 1 0.1%

98 Won't answer 12 0.7%

99 Don't know 70 3.9%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v130: Red/Red electoral alliance (RV)

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 0-99] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question In politics people sometimes talk of left and right. Where would you place the different parties on a scale ranging from 0 to10 where 0 is the left side and 10 is the right side?

... H. Red/Red electoral alliance (RV)

Interviewer's instructions Personal interviews: Use card 14.The order of the parties is rotated.

Value Label Cases Percentage

0 0. Left side 775 43.5%

1 1. 424 23.8%

2 2. 210 11.8%

3 3. 104 5.8%

4 4. 50 2.8%

5 5. 55 3.1%

6 6. 15 0.8%

Page 216: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 216 -

# v130: Red/Red electoral alliance (RV)

Value Label Cases Percentage

7 7. 8 0.4%

8 8. 7 0.4%

9 9. 2 0.1%

10 10. Right side 6 0.3%

96 96. Never heard of 17 1.0%

98 Won't answer 12 0.7%

99 Don't know 97 5.4%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v131: Self-placement on left-right scale

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 0-99] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Where would you place yourself on a scale from 0 to 10 where 0 means the left and 10 means right?

Interviewer's instructions Personal interviews: Use card 14.

Value Label Cases Percentage

0 0. Left 24 1.3%

1 1. 34 1.9%

2 2. 95 5.3%

3 3. 190 10.7%

4 4. 213 12.0%

5 5. 331 18.6%

6 6. 213 12.0%

7 7. 291 16.3%

8 8. 207 11.6%

9 9. 66 3.7%

10 10. Right 58 3.3%

98 Won't answer 13 0.7%

99 Don't know 47 2.6%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v132: The campaign helped to clarify the differences between the parties

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question When you look back on the election campaign. To what extent do you think this campaign helped to clarify the differencesbetween the parties? Would you say..

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 To a large degree 70 3.9%

2 To a fairly large extent 604 33.9%

3 To relatively little extent 853 47.9%

4 To a very little extent 217 12.2%

8 Won't answer 5 0.3%

9 Don't know 33 1.9%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

Page 217: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 217 -

# v133: Follow the media during the election campaign

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question How well did you follow the media during the election campaign? Very well, fairly well, not well, or didn't you follow it atall?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Very well 186 10.4%

2 Fairly well 941 52.8%

3 Not well 522 29.3%

4 Not at all 123 6.9%

8 Won't answer 6 0.3%

9 Don't know 4 0.2%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v134: Satisfied with the way democracy works in Norway

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question All things considered, are you very satisfied, quite satisfied, not quite satisfied or not satisfied at all with the way democracyworks in Norway?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Very satisfied 377 21.2%

2 Quite satisfied 1177 66.0%

3 Not very satisfied 175 9.8%

4 Not satisfied at all 30 1.7%

8 Won't answer 6 0.3%

9 Don't know 17 1.0%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v135: Party affiliation

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-99] [Missing=*/30/98/99]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=930 /-] [Invalid=852 /-]

Literal question Many people think of themselves as adherents of a particular party, while others feel no affiliation with any party. Wouldyou say that you in general think of yourself as a Conservative, a Laborite a SV supporter etc., or don't you consider yourselfaffiliated with any particular party?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Red/Red Electoral Alliance 9 1.0%

2 Socialist Left Party (SV) 75 8.1%

3 Labour Party (DnA) 375 40.3%

4 Liberal Party (V) 35 3.8%

5 Christian People's Party (KrF) 44 4.7%

6 Center Party (Sp) 40 4.3%

7 Conservative Party (H) 219 23.5%

8 Progress Party (FrP) 130 14.0%

9 Other parties 3 0.3%

30 No parties (30) 837

98 Won't answer 6

Page 218: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 218 -

# v135: Party affiliation

Value Label Cases Percentage

99 Don't know 9Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v136: Strongly convinced supporter

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=930 /-] [Invalid=852 /-]

Literal question Do you consider yourself to be a strongly convinced supporter, or are you not a particularly convinced supporter of thisparty?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Strongly convinced 562 60.4%

2 Not very convinced 363 39.0%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 5 0.5%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v137: Read on internet in connection with the election

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question How often did you read about the election on the Internet in connection with the election campaign?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Every day 390 21.9%

2 At least once a week 489 27.4%

3 Less 396 22.2%

4 Never 499 28.0%

8 Won't answer 5 0.3%

9 Don't know 3 0.2%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v138: Use of parties' home pages

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Regarding the election this year, did you acquire information from the parties' homepages on the internet?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 327 18.4%

2 No 1441 80.9%

3 Don't remember 5 0.3%

8 Won't answer 6 0.3%

9 Don't know 3 0.2%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v139: Red/Red Electoral Alliance

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=327 /-] [Invalid=1455 /-]

Literal question Which party or parties' websites did you retrieve information from?

... A. Red Electoral Alliance

Page 219: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 219 -

# v139: Red/Red Electoral Alliance

Interviewer's instructions If answered 'yes' in spm45.R. can mention several parties

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 45 13.8%

2 No 277 84.7%

8 Won't answer 1 0.3%

9 Don't know 4 1.2%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v140: Got info: SV

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=327 /-] [Invalid=1455 /-]

Literal question Which party or parties' websites did you retrieve information from?

... B. Social Left Party

Interviewer's instructions If answered 'yes' in spm45.R. can mention several parties.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 128 39.1%

2 No 194 59.3%

8 Won't answer 1 0.3%

9 Don't know 4 1.2%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v141: Got info: DNA

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=327 /-] [Invalid=1455 /-]

Literal question Which party or parties' websites did you retrieve information from?

... C. The Labour Party

Interviewer's instructions If answered 'yes' in spm45.R. can mention several parties.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 213 65.1%

2 No 109 33.3%

8 Won't answer 1 0.3%

9 Don't know 4 1.2%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v142: Got info: V

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=327 /-] [Invalid=1455 /-]

Literal question Which party or parties' websites did you retrieve information from?

... D. The Liberal Party

Interviewer's instructions If answered 'yes' in spm45.R. can mention several parties.

Page 220: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 220 -

# v142: Got info: V

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 107 32.7%

2 No 215 65.7%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 5 1.5%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v143: Got info: Krf

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=327 /-] [Invalid=1455 /-]

Literal question Which party or parties' websites did you retrieve information from?

... E. The Christian People's Party

Interviewer's instructions If answered 'yes' in spm45.R. can mention several parties.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 78 23.9%

2 No 244 74.6%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 5 1.5%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v144: Got info: SP

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=327 /-] [Invalid=1455 /-]

Literal question Which party or parties' websites did you retrieve information from?

... F. The Center Party

Interviewer's instructions If answered 'yes' in spm45.R. can mention several parties.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 89 27.2%

2 No 233 71.3%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 5 1.5%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v145: Got info: H

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=327 /-] [Invalid=1455 /-]

Literal question Which party or parties' websites did you retrieve information from?

... G. The Conservative Party

Interviewer's instructions If answered 'yes' in spm45.R. can mention several parties.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 180 55.0%

Page 221: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 221 -

# v145: Got info: H

Value Label Cases Percentage

2 No 142 43.4%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 5 1.5%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v146: Got info: Frp

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=327 /-] [Invalid=1455 /-]

Literal question Which party or parties' websites did you retrieve information from?

... H. The Progress Party

Interviewer's instructions If answered 'yes' in spm45.R. can mention several parties.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 170 52.0%

2 No 152 46.5%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 5 1.5%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v147: Got info: Other parties

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=327 /-] [Invalid=1455 /-]

Literal question Which party or parties' websites did you retrieve information from?

... I. Other parties

Interviewer's instructions If answered 'yes' in spm45.R. can mention several parties.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 19 5.8%

2 No 303 92.7%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 5 1.5%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v148: Visited politicians' websites

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Have you in connection with the election this year, visited some politicians' websites, such as facebook or twitter?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 139 7.8%

2 No 1632 91.6%

3 Don't remember 1 0.1%

8 Won't answer 6 0.3%

9 Don't know 4 0.2%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

Page 222: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 222 -

# v149: Web pages of party leaders or other politicians

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=139 /-] [Invalid=1643 /-]

Literal question Was this mainly web pages of party leaders, or was it mainly other politicians?

Interviewer's instructions If answered 'yes' in spm47.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Mainly party leaders 78 56.1%

2 Both 17 12.2%

3 Other politicians 42 30.2%

4 Don't remember/won't answer 2 1.4%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Dont know 0Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v150: Political advertising allowed

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question There has been some discussion about wether political advertising on television should be allowed or not. What is youropinion on this question?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Political advertising should be permitted 699 39.2%

2 Political advertising should not be allowed 1001 56.2%

3 Other 36 2.0%

8 Won't answer 6 0.3%

9 Don't know 40 2.2%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

Page 223: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 223 -

# v151: Specify other political advertising

Information [Type= discrete] [Format=character] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=36 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Specify other political advertising

Value Label Cases Percentage

(9) vet ikke 1 2.8%

Begrensettillatelse

1 2.8%

Bryr meg ikkeom det

1 2.8%

Greit om deter, bare IO kanfå informasjonannet sted

1 2.8%

Ingen betydningfor meg

1 2.8%

Ingen mening 1 2.8%

Io uttrykker atdet KAN tillates

1 2.8%

NEI 1 2.8%

Sensurnå.Pengesterkepartier kommertil i media.Allem.list

1 2.8%

Spiller ingenrolle

2 5.6%

Vet ikke 1 2.8%

bryr seg ikke 1 2.8%

bør tillates påselektiv basis

1 2.8%

det må andrebestemme

1 2.8%

for reklame,men den måvære saklig

1 2.8%

har ingenmening

1 2.8%

helt likegjyldiig 1 2.8%

ikke mening omdette

1 2.8%

ikke noe bestemtmening om det

1 2.8%

ikke noenmening

1 2.8%

ikke på NRK,ellers OK

1 2.8%

ikke som i Usaat politikererakker ned påhverandre

1 2.8%

ingen mening 1 2.8%

1 2.8%

Page 224: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 224 -

# v151: Specify other political advertising

Value Label Cases Percentage

ja hvis det ikkeblir styrt avøkonomisk evne

ja. tillatast,berre undervalkampen

1 2.8%

likegyldig 1 2.8%

litt for og littmot.

1 2.8%

mer klarhet 1 2.8%

nøytral 1 2.8%

småpartier fårikke kommefrem pga fattigrik hvis dette utl

1 2.8%

så lenge allepartier får likmulighet

1 2.8%

tillates forutsattat innholdet ersaklig.

1 2.8%

usikker 1 2.8%

vet ikke 1 2.8%

vet ikke hvordandet arter seg

1 2.8%

Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v152: Government was important for voting

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*/8/9]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1765 /-] [Invalid=17 /-]

Literal question Before the election, there were discussions about which government the country would get. How important was this topic foryour vote? Would you say...

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Very important 811 45.9%

2 Fairly important 629 35.6%

3 Not very important 240 13.6%

4 Not important at all 85 4.8%

8 Won't answer 6

9 Don't know 11Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v153: Preferred government option

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Before the election this year, it has been discussed several different government options. Which of the following options doyou prefer yourself?

Interviewer's instructions If necessary read the options one more time.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Government: SV, AP og SP 861 48.3%

Page 225: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 225 -

# v153: Preferred government option

Value Label Cases Percentage

2 Government: Krf, V og H 284 15.9%

3 Government: H og Frp 472 26.5%

4 Other 119 6.7%

8 Won't answer 9 0.5%

9 Don't know 37 2.1%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v154: Specify other government options

Information [Type= discrete] [Format=character] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=119 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Specify other government options.

Value Label Cases Percentage

(8) nekter/vilikke svare

1 0.8%

(9) vet ikke 3 2.5%

+rv 1 0.8%

? 1 0.8%

AP 1 0.8%

AP og H 1 0.8%

AP og SV 1 0.8%

ARBEIDERPARTIETOG HØYRE

1 0.8%

Ap 1 0.8%

Ap høyre ogsenterpartiet

1 0.8%

Ap og Frp 1 0.8%

Ap og høyre 1 0.8%

Ap og venstre 1 0.8%

Ap&Høyre 1 0.8%

Ap, Høyre og fremskrittspartiet 1 0.8%

Ap, Sv, Rødt 1 0.8%

Ap, sv ogvensrte

1 0.8%

Arbeiderpartiet 2 1.7%

Arbeiderpartietalene

1 0.8%

Arbeiderpartietog Høyre

1 0.8%

Arbeiderpartietog høyre

1 0.8%

Arbeiderpartietog senterpartier

1 0.8%

Arbriderpartiet,Venstre,Senterpartiet

1 0.8%

Bare Høyre 1 0.8%

FrP, Krf, Høyre 1 0.8%

Page 226: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 226 -

# v154: Specify other government options

Value Label Cases Percentage

Har ikkeforutsetning forå svare

1 0.8%

HØYRE OG AP 1 0.8%

Høyre og AP 1 0.8%

Høyre ogArbeiderpartiet

1 0.8%

Høyre ogSenterpartiet

1 0.8%

Høyre, SV ogAp.

1 0.8%

Høyre, fremskrittspartietog venstre

1 0.8%

Høyre,Fremskrittspartietog Kristeligfolkeparti

1 0.8%

Ingen 1 0.8%

Ingen forslag 1 0.8%

Kr.f-Senterpartiet-arbeiderpartiet

1 0.8%

Krf,Frp,Høgre 1 0.8%

Krf- Høyre - Frp 1 0.8%

Miljøpartiet DeGrønne-SV-DNA

1 0.8%

RENARBEIDERPARTI REG

1 0.8%

Rødt og SV 1 0.8%

SV og Rødt ogAp

1 0.8%

SV; AP; Rødt 1 0.8%

Spilte ingenrolle

1 0.8%

Venstre 1 0.8%

Venstre oghøyre

1 0.8%

Venstre, Høyre,Krf og Frp

1 0.8%

ap 2 1.7%

ap + h 1 0.8%

ap + venstre + sp 1 0.8%

ap og høyre 4 3.4%

ap+h 1 0.8%

ap+h+frp+sv 1 0.8%

ap+krf 1 0.8%

ap+sv+venstre+miløpartietde grønne

1 0.8%

ap+v 1 0.8%

Page 227: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 227 -

# v154: Specify other government options

Value Label Cases Percentage

ap, sv, venstre 1 0.8%

ap-h 1 0.8%

ap-sp 1 0.8%

arb partiet 1 0.8%

arbeiderpartiet 1 0.8%

arbeiderpartietog fremskrittsp

1 0.8%

arbeiderpartietog høyre

2 1.7%

barearbeiderpartiet

1 0.8%

barearbeiderpartietalene

1 0.8%

borgerligflertallsregjering

1 0.8%

dei som får fleststemmer må sittei regjering

1 0.8%

dna, vinstre+ senterpart+kristelegfolkeparti

1 0.8%

framskrittspartiet 1 0.8%

fremskrittpartiet 1 0.8%

frp 3 2.5%

frp+h+ap 1 0.8%

h 1 0.8%

h+v+frp+krf 1 0.8%

h+v+krf+frp 1 0.8%

høgre +arbeiderpartiet

1 0.8%

høyre 2 1.7%

høyre , frp,venstre , krf

1 0.8%

høyre - ap 1 0.8%

høyre /Arbeiderpartiet

1 0.8%

høyre og AP 1 0.8%

høyre og Ap 1 0.8%

høyre, frp, krf,venstre

1 0.8%

høyre, krf og fremskrittspartiet 1 0.8%

høyre, krf ogvenstre

1 0.8%

høyre, venstre 1 0.8%

høyre,fremskrittspartietog kristeligfolkeparti

1 0.8%

høyre- frp - ap 1 0.8%

Page 228: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 228 -

# v154: Specify other government options

Value Label Cases Percentage

høyre-ap 1 0.8%

høyre-arbeiderpartiet

1 0.8%

intet spes.. 1 0.8%

kr.f+høyre+venstre+frp 1 0.8%

krf, høyre, frp,arbeiderpartiet.

1 0.8%

krf-høyre-frp 1 0.8%

krf-v-frp 1 0.8%

kun ap 1 0.8%

midretallsregjeringmedarbeiderpartiet

1 0.8%

ren ap 1 0.8%

renarbeiderpartietregjering

1 0.8%

ren arbeiderpartiregjering 1 0.8%

rv - sv -ap 1 0.8%

senterpartiet svap og rødt

1 0.8%

senterpartiet,KRF,høyre, venstre

1 0.8%

ut med sv 1 0.8%

venstre høgresosialistiskvenstrep

1 0.8%

venstre, høyre,senterpartiet

1 0.8%

ville hatt enregjering,tamakta frapolitikere

1 0.8%

vinstre +arbeiderp. +senterpartiet

1 0.8%

Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v155: Parties R. doesn't want to be part of the Government

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Is there any party or parties you definitely don't want to take office and be part of the Government?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 1403 78.7%

2 Maybe, in doubt 68 3.8%

3 No 289 16.2%

8 Won't answer 7 0.4%

9 Don't know 15 0.8%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

Page 229: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 229 -

# v156: Should not form a government: Red Electoral Alliance

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1471 /-] [Invalid=311 /-]

Literal question Which party or parties is that?

... A. Red Electoral Alliance

Interviewer's instructions R. is free to mention more than one party.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 650 44.2%

2 No 810 55.1%

8 Won't answer 1 0.1%

9 Don't know 10 0.7%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v157: Should not form a government: SV

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1471 /-] [Invalid=311 /-]

Literal question Which party or parties is that?

... B. Social Left Party (SV)

Interviewer's instructions R. is free to mention more than one party.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 339 23.0%

2 No 1121 76.2%

8 Won't answer 1 0.1%

9 Don't know 10 0.7%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v158: Should not form a government: DNA

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1471 /-] [Invalid=311 /-]

Literal question Which party or parties is that?

... C. Labour Party (DNA)

Interviewer's instructions R. is free to mention more than one party.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 58 3.9%

2 No 1402 95.3%

8 Won't answer 1 0.1%

9 Don't know 10 0.7%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v159: Should not form a government: V

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1471 /-] [Invalid=311 /-]

Literal question Which party or parties is that?

... D. Liberal Party (V)

Page 230: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 230 -

# v159: Should not form a government: V

Interviewer's instructions R. is free to mention more than one party.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 148 10.1%

2 No 1312 89.2%

8 Won't answer 1 0.1%

9 Don't know 10 0.7%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v160: Should not form a government: Krf

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1471 /-] [Invalid=311 /-]

Literal question Which party or parties is that?

... E. Christian People's Party (KrF)

Interviewer's instructions R. is free to mention more than one party.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 288 19.6%

2 No 1172 79.7%

8 Won't answer 1 0.1%

9 Don't know 10 0.7%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v161: Should not form a government: SP

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1471 /-] [Invalid=311 /-]

Literal question Which party or parties is that?

... F. Center Party (SP)

Interviewer's instructions R. is free to mention more than one party.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 101 6.9%

2 No 1359 92.4%

8 Won't answer 1 0.1%

9 Don't know 10 0.7%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v162: Should not form a government: H

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1471 /-] [Invalid=311 /-]

Literal question Which party or parties is that?

... G. Conservative Party (H)

Interviewer's instructions R. is free to mention more than one party.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 82 5.6%

2 No 1378 93.7%

Page 231: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 231 -

# v162: Should not form a government: H

Value Label Cases Percentage

8 Won't answer 1 0.1%

9 Don't know 10 0.7%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v163: Should not form a government: Frp

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1471 /-] [Invalid=311 /-]

Literal question Which party or parties is that?

... H. Progress Party (FrP)

Interviewer's instructions R. is free to mention more than one party.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 819 55.7%

2 No 641 43.6%

8 Won't answer 1 0.1%

9 Don't know 10 0.7%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v164: Should not form a government: Other parties

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1471 /-] [Invalid=311 /-]

Literal question Which party or parties is that?

... I. Other parties

Interviewer's instructions R. is free to mention more than one party.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 54 3.7%

2 No 1406 95.6%

8 Won't answer 1 0.1%

9 Don't know 10 0.7%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v165: Areas where the red - green government has done a good job

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Is there a special area where you think the red - green government has done a good job?

Interviewer's instructions To the interviewer: Open question. Tick the most appropriate in relation to the respondent's answer - it is allowed forrespondents to mention several areas.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 1031 57.9%

2 No 679 38.1%

8 Won't answer 8 0.4%

9 Don't know 64 3.6%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

Page 232: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 232 -

# v166: Area 1 governm. did a good job

Information [Type= discrete] [Format=character] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1030 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Is there a special area where you think the red - green government has done a good job?

... A. Area 1

Interviewer's instructions To the interviewer: Open question. Tick the most appropriate in relation to the respondent's answer - it is allowed forrespondents to mention several areas.

Value Label Cases Percentage

"Tiltakspakken" 1 0.1%

(9) vet ikke 8 0.8%

Arbeid 1 0.1%

Arbeidsledighet 3 0.3%

Arbeidsledigheten 1 0.1%

Arbeidsledighetgen 1 0.1%

Arbeidsledihet 1 0.1%

Arbeidslivet 1 0.1%

Arbeidslæyse 1 0.1%

Arbeidsløshet 1 0.1%

Arbeidsplasser 1 0.1%

BARNEHAGE 1 0.1%

BARNEHAGEPOLITIKKEN 2 0.2%

BARNEHAGEPOLTIKKEN 1 0.1%

BARNEHAGER 2 0.2%

BARNEHAGEUTBYGGING 1 0.1%

BARNEHAGEUTBYGGINGEN 1 0.1%

Baarnehage 1 0.1%

Barne ogfameliepolitikken

1 0.1%

Barne- ogfamilie

1 0.1%

Barnehage 11 1.1%

Barnehagedekning 5 0.5%

Barnehagedekningen 2 0.2%

Barnehagene 1 0.1%

Barnehagepolitikk 1 0.1%

Barnehager 4 0.4%

Barnehager småbarnsfamilien 1 0.1%

Barnehagesaken 1 0.1%

Barnehageutbygging 2 0.2%

Bra håndteringav finanskrisa

1 0.1%

Distriktspolitikk 1 0.1%

E6 i Østfoldveinettet

1 0.1%

Eldreomsorgen 1 0.1%

Page 233: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 233 -

# v166: Area 1 governm. did a good job

Value Label Cases Percentage

Eldrepolitikken 1 0.1%

FINANS OGØKONOMI

1 0.1%

FINANSKRISA 1 0.1%

FINANSPOLITIKKEN 1 0.1%

FINNANSKRISA 1 0.1%

FinANSKRISEN 1 0.1%

Finaans 1 0.1%

Finans 17 1.7%

Finanskrisa 14 1.4%

Finanskrise 3 0.3%

Finanskrisetiltak

1 0.1%

Finanskrisehåndteringen 1 0.1%

Finanskrisen 53 5.1%

Finanskrisen -behandlingen

1 0.1%

Finanskrisenshåndtering

1 0.1%

Finanspolitikk 2 0.2%

Finanspolitikken 1 0.1%

Finanssituasjonen 1 0.1%

Finnanskrisa 1 0.1%

Flere arb.plasser 1 0.1%

Forbedring av kommuneøkonomi 1 0.1%

Forhindre at arbeidsmiljølovenble rasert

1 0.1%

Forvalteoljeressrser

1 0.1%

Full barnehagedekkning 1 0.1%

Ført folkelegpolitikk

1 0.1%

God økonomiforvaltning 1 0.1%

God økonomiskstyring vedfinanskrisa

1 0.1%

Grasrotandelen iNorsk tipping

1 0.1%

HELSE OG SOSIALPOLITIKK 1 0.1%

Helse 3 0.3%

Helsepolitikk 1 0.1%

Helsereform 1 0.1%

Holdearb.ledighetenlav

1 0.1%

Holde arbeidsledighetennede

1 0.1%

1 0.1%

Page 234: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 234 -

# v166: Area 1 governm. did a good job

Value Label Cases Percentage

Høyereutdanning

INNVANDRINGSPOLITIKKEN 1 0.1%

Inkludering 1 0.1%

Innvandring 1 0.1%

Innvandringspolitikk 1 0.1%

KULTUROMRÅDE 1 0.1%

Klima 1 0.1%

Klimapolitikk 1 0.1%

Kommunesektoren 1 0.1%

Krisepakka 1 0.1%

Kultur 2 0.2%

Kulturpolitikk 1 0.1%

Landbruk 1 0.1%

Landbrukspolitikk 1 0.1%

Levestandard 1 0.1%

Likhet 1 0.1%

Lokalpolitikk 1 0.1%

Mijø 1 0.1%

Miljø 4 0.4%

Miljø begynt 1 0.1%

Minstepensjonister/trygdede

1 0.1%

NAV-reform 1 0.1%

OLJEPOLITIKK 1 0.1%

OMSORGSPOLITIKKENGENERELT

1 0.1%

Offentlig sektor 1 0.1%

Opprettholdearbeidsplasser

1 0.1%

Opprettholdevelferden isamfunnet

1 0.1%

PENSJONSORDNING-RETTFERDIG

1 0.1%

Pensjonsforliket 1 0.1%

Rammebetingelserforskipsindustrien

1 0.1%

Rydde oppifinanskrisa

1 0.1%

SAMFERDSEL 5 0.5%

SKOLEPOLIIKK 1 0.1%

SKOLEPOLITIKKEN 1 0.1%

Samarbeidetgodt

1 0.1%

Samferdsel 7 0.7%

Page 235: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 235 -

# v166: Area 1 governm. did a good job

Value Label Cases Percentage

Samferdselsp.veiv.krisepakke

1 0.1%

Skattepolitikk 1 0.1%

Skattepolitikken 1 0.1%

Skatter 1 0.1%

Skole 8 0.8%

Skole ogutdanning

1 0.1%

Skolepolitikk 1 0.1%

Soria Moria80%gjennomført

1 0.1%

Sparte godetider, ga idårlege tider

1 0.1%

Stabiløkonomistyringi krisa

1 0.1%

Støtte kulturlivet 1 0.1%

Sykehusdrift 1 0.1%

Syselsetting 1 0.1%

Sysselsetting 10 1.0%

Sysselsettingen 1 0.1%

UJtdanning 1 0.1%

UTDANNING 1 0.1%

Utdanning 1 0.1%

Utenriks saker 1 0.1%

Utenrikspolitikk 3 0.3%

Utenrikspolitikken 2 0.2%

Utenrikspolitikkenv. Støre

1 0.1%

Utenrikspolitisk 1 0.1%

Utenriksspørsmål 1 0.1%

Utsatteoljeboring i nord

1 0.1%

VELFERSSTATENTATT VAREPÅ DEN ENDEL

1 0.1%

Vegbygging 1 0.1%

Vegutbygging 1 0.1%

Velferd 2 0.2%

Værnearbeidsplassene ifinanskrisa

1 0.1%

arb ledighet 1 0.1%

arbeid 1 0.1%

arbeid for alle 1 0.1%

arbeid til alla 1 0.1%

Page 236: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 236 -

# v166: Area 1 governm. did a good job

Value Label Cases Percentage

arbeid-sysselsetting

1 0.1%

arbeidsledigheit 1 0.1%

arbeidsledighet 8 0.8%

arbeidsledigheten 2 0.2%

arbeidsledihet 1 0.1%

arbeidslivspolitikk

1 0.1%

arbeidsløsheten 3 0.3%

arbeidsmarked 1 0.1%

arbeidsmarked-taklefinanskrisen

1 0.1%

arbeidsmarkedet 1 0.1%

arbeidsmarkedstiltak 1 0.1%

arbeidsmiljøloven

1 0.1%

arbeidsplasser 2 0.2%

arbeidsplesser 1 0.1%

arbeidspolitikken 1 0.1%

arbeisledighet 1 0.1%

arbledighet errelativt lav

1 0.1%

arbsplasser 1 0.1%

at regjerningenklarer åsambeide internt

1 0.1%

b arnehager 1 0.1%

bankkrise 1 0.1%

bankkrisen 1 0.1%

barnehagedekning

1 0.1%

barnehage 18 1.7%

barnehagedekning

2 0.2%

barnehage ogskolepolitikk

1 0.1%

barnehage utb. 1 0.1%

barnehage,skuler

1 0.1%

barnehage/familiepolitikk

1 0.1%

barnehagebygging 1 0.1%

barnehagedekbning 1 0.1%

barnehagedekkning 2 0.2%

barnehagedekkningen 1 0.1%

barnehagedekning

1 0.1%

Page 237: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 237 -

# v166: Area 1 governm. did a good job

Value Label Cases Percentage

barnehagedekning 31 3.0%

barnehagedekningog skoler

1 0.1%

barnehagedekningen 6 0.6%

barnehagene 1 0.1%

barnehageordninga 1 0.1%

barnehageplasser 3 0.3%

barnehageplasser,håndtering avfinanskrisen

1 0.1%

barnehagepolitikk 2 0.2%

barnehager 18 1.7%

barnehagesaken 1 0.1%

barnehagesatsing 1 0.1%

barnehageutbygging 8 0.8%

barnehageutbygginga 1 0.1%

barnehaqgesatsningen 1 0.1%

barnepolitiken 1 0.1%

beholdt styringav kraften vår

1 0.1%

budsjett,økonomi

1 0.1%

distrikspolirikk 1 0.1%

distriktpolitikk 1 0.1%

distriktspolitikk 3 0.3%

ekteskapsloven 1 0.1%

eldreoms 1 0.1%

eldreomsog 1 0.1%

eldreomsorg 7 0.7%

eldreomsorgen 3 0.3%

eldrepolitikken 2 0.2%

familiepolitikk 2 0.2%

fatidom 1 0.1%

fatt tilbakeutbytte skatten

1 0.1%

fellesskapet 1 0.1%

finan krisen 1 0.1%

finanaskrisen 1 0.1%

finannskrisen 1 0.1%

finans 15 1.5%

finans krisen 3 0.3%

finansekrisen 1 0.1%

finansenkrisen 1 0.1%

finansepolitisk 1 0.1%

finanskria 1 0.1%

Page 238: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 238 -

# v166: Area 1 governm. did a good job

Value Label Cases Percentage

finanskris 1 0.1%

finanskrisa 32 3.1%

finanskrise 5 0.5%

finanskrisehåndtering

1 0.1%

finanskrise-hånteringen

1 0.1%

finanskrisehåndteringen 1 0.1%

finanskrisen 149 14.5%

finanskrisenshåndtering

1 0.1%

finanskrisne 1 0.1%

finansområdet 1 0.1%

finanspolitikken 1 0.1%

finanssiden 1 0.1%

finansskrisen 1 0.1%

finaskrisa 1 0.1%

finaskrisen 1 0.1%

finjanskrisehåndtering 1 0.1%

fint gjennomfinanskrisa

1 0.1%

fordeling 1 0.1%

fordelingspolitikk 1 0.1%

fordelingspolitikken 2 0.2%

forsvaret 1 0.1%

fred 1 0.1%

fredsarbeid 1 0.1%

full barnehagedekkning 1 0.1%

full barnehagedekning 5 0.5%

full barnehageutbygging 1 0.1%

fått tilsysselsettinh

1 0.1%

generelt bra 1 0.1%

generelt godjobb

1 0.1%

god sysselsetting 1 0.1%

godutenrikspolitikk F.eks.palestinaspm.

1 0.1%

godt samhold 1 0.1%

gor håndteringav finanskrisen

1 0.1%

gratisskolebøker påvidregående

1 0.1%

grenseavtale motIsland

1 0.1%

handtering avfinanskrisen

1 0.1%

Page 239: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 239 -

# v166: Area 1 governm. did a good job

Value Label Cases Percentage

helse 11 1.1%

helsefamiliepolitikk

1 0.1%

helse ogeldreomsorg

1 0.1%

helse og miljø 1 0.1%

helse og omsorg 1 0.1%

helse og sosial 1 0.1%

helse og velferd 1 0.1%

helse%sosial 1 0.1%

helsepolitikk 1 0.1%

helsepolitikken 2 0.2%

helsepolitkken 1 0.1%

helsesektoren 2 0.2%

helsespørsmålet 1 0.1%

helsevesenet 1 0.1%

helsevesnet 1 0.1%

hindretoljeboring vedLofoten

1 0.1%

holdeøkonomisk flyt ilandet

1 0.1%

holdt arb.ledigh.i sjakk

1 0.1%

holdtarbeidsledelsennede

1 0.1%

håmndteringenav finanskrisen

1 0.1%

håndterefinanskrisen

1 0.1%

håndterefinsanskrisen

1 0.1%

håndtering avbankkrisa

1 0.1%

håndtering avfinans krisen

1 0.1%

håndtering avfinanskrisa

1 0.1%

håndtering avfinanskrisen

4 0.4%

håndtering avøkonomikrisen

1 0.1%

håndteringen avfinanskrisen

3 0.3%

håndtertfinanskrisa bra

1 0.1%

håndtertfinanskrisen bra

1 0.1%

Page 240: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 240 -

# v166: Area 1 governm. did a good job

Value Label Cases Percentage

håndtertfinanskrisensvært godt

1 0.1%

håndtreing avfinanskrisen

1 0.1%

ikkeprivatisering

1 0.1%

industri 1 0.1%

innensysselsetting

1 0.1%

innvandringspolitikken 1 0.1%

interntsamarbeid

1 0.1%

io`s tilfredshetmed det daglige

1 0.1%

jernbane 1 0.1%

kampen motsosial dumping

1 0.1%

kirke 1 0.1%

klima 6 0.6%

kollektivtransport

1 0.1%

kollektiv/jernbane

1 0.1%

kollektivtrafikk 1 0.1%

kommunalsektor

1 0.1%

kommunaløkonomi

1 0.1%

kommunefinansiering 1 0.1%

kommuneoverføring 1 0.1%

kommunepolitikk 2 0.2%

kommunepolitikken 1 0.1%

kommuneøkonomi 2 0.2%

kommuneøkonomien 4 0.4%

kommuneøonomi 1 0.1%

kriminalomsorg 1 0.1%

kriminalomsorgen 1 0.1%

kultur 8 0.8%

landbruk 1 0.1%

landets økonomi 1 0.1%

litearbeidsledighet

1 0.1%

makspris ibarnehage

1 0.1%

miljø 8 0.8%

miljøpolitikken 1 0.1%

miljøsiden 1 0.1%

Page 241: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 241 -

# v166: Area 1 governm. did a good job

Value Label Cases Percentage

miljøvern 1 0.1%

minskearb.ledigheten

1 0.1%

nedarbeidsledighet

1 0.1%

nybygging,veier,

1 0.1%

næringspolitikk 1 0.1%

offentligvelferdstilbud

1 0.1%

offentlige skole 1 0.1%

offentligetilbudet styrjet

1 0.1%

olje oggassutbygging

1 0.1%

oljeutbygging iLofoten

1 0.1%

oppgraderekvinners lønn

1 0.1%

opprettevelferden

1 0.1%

oppussingen avskole

1 0.1%

organisasjon nettolønnsordn.sjøfolk 1 0.1%

pengeoverføringertil kommunene

1 0.1%

pensjon 2 0.2%

pensjonister 1 0.1%

pensjonsreformen 1 0.1%

prøvd og få folki arbeid

1 0.1%

samfedsel 1 0.1%

samferdse 1 0.1%

samferdsel 33 3.2%

samferdsel, 1 0.1%

samferdselspolitikk 1 0.1%

samferdsle 2 0.2%

samfunns sosial 1 0.1%

sanferdsel 1 0.1%

skatt 1 0.1%

skatte ogavgiftspolitikken

1 0.1%

skattepolitikk 1 0.1%

skattepolitikken 1 0.1%

skole 21 2.0%

skole barnehage 2 0.2%

skole ogbarnepolitikk

1 0.1%

Page 242: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 242 -

# v166: Area 1 governm. did a good job

Value Label Cases Percentage

skolepolitikk 3 0.3%

skolepolitikken 2 0.2%

skolepolotikken 1 0.1%

sosiale forhold 1 0.1%

sosiale goder 1 0.1%

sosialpolitikk 1 0.1%

sosialpolitikken 1 0.1%

stabilisereøkonomien inorge

1 0.1%

stimulereindustrien ogarbeidsplasser

1 0.1%

styrketkommuneøk

1 0.1%

syselsetting 1 0.1%

sysselseting 1 0.1%

sysselsetting 9 0.9%

sysselsettingen 1 0.1%

sysselsettingspolitikken 1 0.1%

sysselsettning 2 0.2%

takletfinanskrisengodt

1 0.1%

takletfinanskrisen bra

1 0.1%

takling avfinanskrisa

1 0.1%

takling avfinanskrise

1 0.1%

utbygging avbarnehager

2 0.2%

utdanning 3 0.3%

utdfanning ogskole

1 0.1%

utenriks 3 0.3%

utenriks politikk 1 0.1%

utenrikspolitikk 1 0.1%

utenrikspolitikken 5 0.5%

utenrikspolitisk 1 0.1%

utenriskspolitikk 1 0.1%

utrikspolitikken 1 0.1%

vegbygging/samferdsle

1 0.1%

veger 1 0.1%

vei 2 0.2%

veibygging 1 0.1%

1 0.1%

Page 243: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 243 -

# v166: Area 1 governm. did a good job

Value Label Cases Percentage

veibygging E18Kr.sand

veiene 1 0.1%

veier 1 0.1%

veier og sånt 1 0.1%

veiutbygging 1 0.1%

velferd 2 0.2%

velferdsgoder 1 0.1%

verdispørsmål 1 0.1%

vernesaker 1 0.1%

xxx 1 0.1%

ØKONOMI 1 0.1%

ØKONOMISKEKRISEN

1 0.1%

Økonoimi 1 0.1%

Økonomi 7 0.7%

Økonomikrisa 1 0.1%

Økonomipolitikken 1 0.1%

Økonomiskpolitikk

4 0.4%

Økonomiskepolitikken

1 0.1%

å taklefinanskrisen

1 0.1%

øKONOMI 1 0.1%

øknomi krisen 1 0.1%

økonmi 1 0.1%

økonomi 15 1.5%

økonomi krise 1 0.1%

økonomi-finans 1 0.1%

økonomi/finanskrisehåndtering

1 0.1%

økonomien 2 0.2%

økonomien vår 1 0.1%

økonomien/finanskrisen

1 0.1%

økonomikrisen 3 0.3%

økonomikrisen,håndteringen av

1 0.1%

økonomisk 1 0.1%

økonomiskkrisen

1 0.1%

økonomiskpolitikk

2 0.2%

økonomiskpolitikk, takletrinanskrisa bra

1 0.1%

1 0.1%

Page 244: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 244 -

# v166: Area 1 governm. did a good job

Value Label Cases Percentage

økonomiskpoltikk

økonomiskstabilitet

1 0.1%

økonomiskstyring

1 0.1%

økonomiskekrisa

1 0.1%

økonomiskekrisen

2 0.2%

økonomiskekrisepakker

1 0.1%

økonomiskekriser

1 0.1%

økonomiskepolitikk

1 0.1%

økonomiskepolitikken/håndtering avfinanskrisen

1 0.1%

økonomiskespørmål

1 0.1%

øktsysselsettning

1 0.1%

økt trygder/ gratisskolebøker

1 0.1%

Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v167: Area 2 governm. did a good job

Information [Type= discrete] [Format=character] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=546 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Is there a special area where you think the red - green government has done a good job?

... B. Area 2

Interviewer's instructions To the interviewer: Open question. Tick the most appropriate in relation to the respondent's answer - it is allowed forrespondents to mention several areas.

Value Label Cases Percentage

(8) nekter/vilikke svare

1 0.2%

(9) vet ikke 11 2.0%

...ellers generelt 1 0.2%

0 1 0.2%

Alternativ energi 1 0.2%

Arbeid - for alle 1 0.2%

Arbeidsledighet 1 0.2%

Arbeidsledigheten 3 0.5%

BARNEHAGEDEKNING-BEDREKVALITET

1 0.2%

BARNEHAGEPOLITIKK 1 0.2%

Page 245: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 245 -

# v167: Area 2 governm. did a good job

Value Label Cases Percentage

BARNEHAGEUTBYGGING 1 0.2%

Barnehage 3 0.5%

Barnehagepolitikken

1 0.2%

Barnehagedekning 5 0.9%

Barnehagedekningen 2 0.4%

Barnehager 1 0.2%

Barnehageutbygging 3 0.5%

Bekjempelse av arbeidsledighetern 1 0.2%

CO2SPØRSMÅLET

1 0.2%

DISTRIKTSPOLITIKK 1 0.2%

Deler avmiljøpolitikken

1 0.2%

Distrikstpolitikken 1 0.2%

ELDREPOLITIKKEN 1 0.2%

Eldreomsorg 3 0.5%

Eldreomsorgen 4 0.7%

Energipolitikk 2 0.4%

Fanilie 1 0.2%

Fattigdom 1 0.2%

Finans 1 0.2%

Finanskrisen 5 0.9%

Finanspolitikk 1 0.2%

Finnanskrisa 1 0.2%

Forsvarligøkonomiskpolitikksp..finansm.

1 0.2%

HELSE OGOMSORG

1 0.2%

HELSESEKTOREN 1 0.2%

Helse 3 0.5%

Helse og omsorg 1 0.2%

Helsepolitikken 1 0.2%

Helsereformen 1 0.2%

Helsetjenesten 1 0.2%

INNVANDRINGSPOLITIKKEN 1 0.2%

Innvandring 1 0.2%

Innvandringspolitikken 2 0.4%

Internasjonaltsamarbeid

1 0.2%

Internationalt 1 0.2%

Justispolitikken 1 0.2%

KLIMA OGMILJØ

1 0.2%

Klima 3 0.5%

Page 246: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 246 -

# v167: Area 2 governm. did a good job

Value Label Cases Percentage

Klimaendringene

1 0.2%

Kollektivtrafikk 1 0.2%

Kommuneøkonomien

1 0.2%

Kommuneøkonomien 2 0.4%

Kultur 2 0.4%

Landbruk 1 0.2%

MILJØ 1 0.2%

Miljø 8 1.5%

Miljøvern 2 0.4%

Minstepensjonister 1 0.2%

NN 1 0.2%

Oljeformuen 1 0.2%

Oljesektoren 1 0.2%

Oslo sentrum 1 0.2%

Pensjonsfond 1 0.2%

Positiv utviklingpolitikonflikt/kriminalomsorg

1 0.2%

SAMFERDSELSPOLITIKKEN 1 0.2%

SKOLE 1 0.2%

SKOLE OGBARNEHAGE

1 0.2%

SKOLE OGUTDANNING

1 0.2%

SKOLER 1 0.2%

SYSSELSETTING 1 0.2%

SYSSELSETTINGSPOLITIKK 1 0.2%

Samferdsel 5 0.9%

Sikre velferden 1 0.2%

Skole 6 1.1%

Skole ogutdanning

1 0.2%

Skole/eldre 1 0.2%

Skolepolitikk 3 0.5%

Skolepolitikken 1 0.2%

Skoler 1 0.2%

Sysselsetning 1 0.2%

Sysselsetting 3 0.5%

Trygdeordninger 1 0.2%

UTDANNINGSPOLITIKK 1 0.2%

Utenriksområdet 1 0.2%

Utenrikspolitikk 4 0.7%

Veiarbeide 1 0.2%

Veiutbygging 1 0.2%

Page 247: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 247 -

# v167: Area 2 governm. did a good job

Value Label Cases Percentage

arbeid 2 0.4%

arbeid forlikelønn

1 0.2%

arbeid til alle 1 0.2%

arbeidmakedet 1 0.2%

arbeidsledig 1 0.2%

arbeidsledighet 11 2.0%

arbeidsledigheten 5 0.9%

arbeidsplasser 1 0.2%

at skaatteneer holdt påsamme niva somtidligere

1 0.2%

barn og unge 1 0.2%

barne 1 0.2%

barnefamiliene 1 0.2%

barnehage 9 1.6%

barnehagedekkning

1 0.2%

barnehagedekkning 1 0.2%

barnehagedekning 8 1.5%

barnehagedekningen 2 0.4%

barnehagen 1 0.2%

barnehager 9 1.6%

barnehageutbygging 2 0.4%

barnehageutbygginga 2 0.4%

barnehageutbyggingen 1 0.2%

beholdtskattenivået

1 0.2%

bistandsarbeid 1 0.2%

bra på det meste 1 0.2%

den økonomiskepolitikken

1 0.2%

distrikt 2 0.4%

distriktpolitik 1 0.2%

distriktspolitikk 1 0.2%

eldre 2 0.4%

eldreomsorg 9 1.6%

eldreomsorgen 3 0.5%

eldrepolitikk 1 0.2%

fellesskapet 1 0.2%

finans krise 1 0.2%

finans krisen 2 0.4%

finans politikk 1 0.2%

finansakrisen 1 0.2%

finanskrisa 4 0.7%

Page 248: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 248 -

# v167: Area 2 governm. did a good job

Value Label Cases Percentage

finanskrise 2 0.4%

finanskrisehåndtering

1 0.2%

finanskrisetaklingen

1 0.2%

finanskrisen 26 4.8%

finanspolitikken 2 0.4%

finaser 1 0.2%

finaskrisen 1 0.2%

fiskeri 1 0.2%

fokus påmiljøvern

1 0.2%

fokus på skoleog utdanning

1 0.2%

fokusering påsysselsettingen

1 0.2%

folk i arbeid 1 0.2%

fordeling avlandets midler

1 0.2%

fordelingspolitikk 2 0.4%

fordelingspolitikken 1 0.2%

forvalteroljeformuengodt

1 0.2%

full barnehagedekning 1 0.2%

gENERELT 1 0.2%

god hjelp tilbankene

1 0.2%

godøkonomistyring

1 0.2%

godt samhold iregjeringen

1 0.2%

gratisskolebøker

1 0.2%

helheten 1 0.2%

helse 14 2.6%

helse og omsorg 3 0.5%

helsevesenet 1 0.2%

holde arbeidsledighetennede

1 0.2%

holde enøkonomiskforsvarligpolitikk

1 0.2%

homofilisaken 1 0.2%

håndtering avfinanskrisen

2 0.4%

håntertfinanskrisen bra

1 0.2%

1 0.2%

Page 249: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 249 -

# v167: Area 2 governm. did a good job

Value Label Cases Percentage

høyereeutdannelse

industri 1 0.2%

infrastrukturbygdenoreg

1 0.2%

innføring av"grasrotandelen"

1 0.2%

innsats motareidsledighet

1 0.2%

innvandring 1 0.2%

innvandringen 1 0.2%

innvandrings 1 0.2%

innvandringspolitikken 1 0.2%

integrering 1 0.2%

internasjonalpolitikk

1 0.2%

internasjonalespørsmål

1 0.2%

jobb til folk 1 0.2%

justis 1 0.2%

justisia 1 0.2%

justissektoren 1 0.2%

kjøp av jagerfly 1 0.2%

klima 4 0.7%

klimaspørsmålet 1 0.2%

kollektivtransport 1 0.2%

kommunebudsjett 1 0.2%

kommuneoverføring 1 0.2%

kommuneøkonomi 2 0.4%

kommuneøkonomien 1 0.2%

kriminal politikk 1 0.2%

kultur 6 1.1%

kultur ieldreomsorg

1 0.2%

kulturområdet 1 0.2%

kulturpolitikken 2 0.4%

landbruk 1 0.2%

lavarbeidsledighet

1 0.2%

lavt rentenivå 1 0.2%

lofoten/vesterålenolje-gassletingender

1 0.2%

miljø 15 2.7%

miljøet 1 0.2%

miljøpolitikk 1 0.2%

Page 250: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 250 -

# v167: Area 2 governm. did a good job

Value Label Cases Percentage

miljøsaken 1 0.2%

miljøvern 2 0.4%

minska arbeidsledigheten 1 0.2%

nødvendiglangsiktighet ipolitkken

1 0.2%

okonomi 1 0.2%

oljefondet 1 0.2%

oljepolitikken 1 0.2%

oljeutvinning 2 0.4%

omlegging iforsvaret

1 0.2%

omsorg 1 0.2%

opprette høysyselsetting ivanskelige tider

1 0.2%

opprettholdtsysselsettingen

1 0.2%

opraen,finanskrisentaklet bra

1 0.2%

ordnettiltak etterfinanskrisen

1 0.2%

politiet 1 0.2%

politistyrking 1 0.2%

prisveksten 1 0.2%

rederiskatten 1 0.2%

rehab -skolebygg

1 0.2%

rente 1 0.2%

rettferdighet 1 0.2%

rimelig godutenriksjobb

1 0.2%

rovdyrpolitikken 1 0.2%

samarbeide medorganisasjoner

1 0.2%

samfedsel 1 0.2%

samferd 1 0.2%

samferdsel 21 3.8%

samferdselspolitikk 1 0.2%

samferdsle 2 0.4%

samfersel 1 0.2%

samfredsle 1 0.2%

samhold 1 0.2%

samiske saker 1 0.2%

sfo 1 0.2%

1 0.2%

Page 251: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 251 -

# v167: Area 2 governm. did a good job

Value Label Cases Percentage

sikrearbeisplasser

sikrevelferdsgoder

1 0.2%

skatt og avgift 1 0.2%

skattepolitikk 6 1.1%

skattepolitikken 3 0.5%

skoilepolitikken 1 0.2%

skole 16 2.9%

skole ogoppvekst

1 0.2%

skole ogutdanning

1 0.2%

skole utdanning 1 0.2%

skole-utdanning 1 0.2%

skolebøker og pc 1 0.2%

skolen 1 0.2%

skolepolitikk 1 0.2%

skoler 1 0.2%

skoleutbygging 1 0.2%

skule 1 0.2%

skule ogsamferdsel

1 0.2%

sosialpoitikk 1 0.2%

sosialt 1 0.2%

sparing 1 0.2%

styrka bedriftene 1 0.2%

styrke offentligsektor

1 0.2%

støtte til Norgesfattigste

1 0.2%

støtte tilkulturformål

1 0.2%

sykeheimplasser 1 0.2%

sykehjemsutbygging 1 0.2%

sykehus 1 0.2%

sysselseting 1 0.2%

sysselsetting 6 1.1%

sysselsettingholdt nede

1 0.2%

sysselsettingsspørsmål 1 0.2%

taklefinanskrisen

1 0.2%

taklefinanskrisengodt

1 0.2%

tja........... 1 0.2%

trygdeordninger 1 0.2%

Page 252: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 252 -

# v167: Area 2 governm. did a good job

Value Label Cases Percentage

trygdespørsmål 1 0.2%

u-hjelp, bistand 1 0.2%

utdanning 2 0.4%

utenriks politikk 1 0.2%

utenrikspolitikk 10 1.8%

utenrikspolitikk;Støre har værtklar

1 0.2%

utenrikspolitikken 4 0.7%

utenrikspolitkken 1 0.2%

utvidelse avpolitiet i norge

1 0.2%

vei 2 0.4%

vei -jernbane 1 0.2%

veiutbygging 3 0.5%

velferd 3 0.5%

velferds politikk 1 0.2%

velferdsamfunnet 1 0.2%

xxx 1 0.2%

Økonomi 2 0.4%

Økonomiskpolitikk

1 0.2%

Øktevegbevilgninger

1 0.2%

øketbevilgningene tilkommunene

1 0.2%

økonomi 3 0.5%

økonomien 1 0.2%

økonomiskpolitikk

1 0.2%

økt bevilgn.tildistriktener

1 0.2%

økt statligeeierandeler

1 0.2%

Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v168: Area 3 governm. did a good job

Information [Type= discrete] [Format=character] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=221 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Is there a special area where you think the red - green government has done a good job?

... C. Area 3

Interviewer's instructions To the interviewer: Open question. Tick the most appropriate in relation to the respondent's answer - it is allowed forrespondents to mention several areas.

Value Label Cases Percentage

(8) nekter/vilikke svare

1 0.5%

Page 253: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 253 -

# v168: Area 3 governm. did a good job

Value Label Cases Percentage

(9) vet ikke 7 3.2%

, 1 0.5%

.,. 1 0.5%

0 1 0.5%

Arbeidsledighet 1 0.5%

Asylpolitikk,håndtering irikktig retning

1 0.5%

Avgiftsnivået 1 0.5%

Bankpakken 1 0.5%

Barnehagedekning 4 1.8%

Barnehager 1 0.5%

Barnehageutb. 1 0.5%

FAMILIEPOLITIKK 1 0.5%

FINANSKRISEN 1 0.5%

FINNANSSPOLITIKKEN 1 0.5%

Finans 1 0.5%

Finanskrisen 4 1.8%

Fordeling avgoder

1 0.5%

Fordeling skatteravgifter

1 0.5%

HELSEPOLITIKK 1 0.5%

Helse 3 1.4%

Helse ogsosialpolitikk

1 0.5%

Helsedpolitikken 1 0.5%

INNVANDRING 1 0.5%

Innvandring 1 0.5%

Kommunal 1 0.5%

Kommuneøkonomien 1 0.5%

Landbruk 2 0.9%

Miljø 3 1.4%

NN' 1 0.5%

Politiområdet/justisområdet

1 0.5%

SAMFERDSEL 1 0.5%

SKOLEPOLITIKK 2 0.9%

SKOLEPOLITIKKEN 1 0.5%

SKOLEPOLITIKKENPÅ LAVERETRINN

1 0.5%

SOSIALPOLITIKKEN- LIKHETMELLOMFOLK

1 0.5%

Samferdsel 4 1.8%

Page 254: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 254 -

# v168: Area 3 governm. did a good job

Value Label Cases Percentage

Sellafield 1 0.5%

Skole 1 0.5%

Skule 1 0.5%

Stadttunnelen,skipstunnelen

1 0.5%

UTENRIKSPOLITIKK 1 0.5%

Utdanning 1 0.5%

Utenriks 1 0.5%

Utenrikspolitikk 2 0.9%

Utenrikspolitikken 1 0.5%

arbeid 1 0.5%

arbeidledighet 1 0.5%

arbeidsledighet 3 1.4%

arbeidsledigheten 1 0.5%

barnehage 3 1.4%

barnehage løfte 1 0.5%

barnehagedekning 2 0.9%

barnehagepolitikk 1 0.5%

barnehager 1 0.5%

barnehageutbygging 1 0.5%

bedre kommuneøkonomi 1 0.5%

bedret psykiskhelsevern

1 0.5%

bistand ogutvikling

1 0.5%

bra på skole 1 0.5%

bygging av sykehjemsplasser 1 0.5%

delt svangerskapspermisjon 1 0.5%

distriktspolitikk 2 0.9%

distriktspolitikken 1 0.5%

domstol og politi 1 0.5%

eldreoms 1 0.5%

eldreomsorg 3 1.4%

eldreomsorgen 1 0.5%

eldrepolitikk 1 0.5%

en sterk og godoffentlig sektor

1 0.5%

energipolitikken 1 0.5%

fam.politikken 1 0.5%

familie 1 0.5%

finans 1 0.5%

finans krisen 1 0.5%

finanskrisen 6 2.7%

forsvar 1 0.5%

forsvarspolitikk 1 0.5%

Page 255: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 255 -

# v168: Area 3 governm. did a good job

Value Label Cases Percentage

fremmemiljøsaker

1 0.5%

full barnehagedekning 1 0.5%

gasskraftverkuten CO2rensning

1 0.5%

god håndteringfinanskrisen

1 0.5%

godskattepolitikk

1 0.5%

godutenrikspolitikk

1 0.5%

helse 2 0.9%

helse og sosial 1 0.5%

helse omsorg 1 0.5%

helsepolitikken 1 0.5%

helspolitikken 1 0.5%

holde på likhetspolitikken(ex.holde lønnsforskjellenenede)

1 0.5%

håndtering avfinansuroen

1 0.5%

håndteringen avfinanskrisen

1 0.5%

industri 1 0.5%

innvandring 5 2.3%

innvandringspolitikken 1 0.5%

innvandringspoltikken 1 0.5%

innvrandringspolitikk 1 0.5%

klima 1 0.5%

kriminalomsorg 1 0.5%

kultur 5 2.3%

kulturpolitikk 2 0.9%

miljø 6 2.7%

miljøprofil 1 0.5%

miljøvern 1 0.5%

motarbeidearbeidsledighet

1 0.5%

nordområdene 1 0.5%

næringspolitikk 1 0.5%

oljeboring i nord 1 0.5%

oljepolitikken 1 0.5%

omsorgssektoren 1 0.5%

opprettholdesysselsettingen

1 0.5%

opprettholdtgodt helsetilbud

1 0.5%

1 0.5%

Page 256: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 256 -

# v168: Area 3 governm. did a good job

Value Label Cases Percentage

pensjonsspm. foroff. ansatte

rehab skole 1 0.5%

rettferdigfordeling avgoder

1 0.5%

rettigheter ogtrygder forpsykisk utvh.

1 0.5%

samferdsel 10 4.5%

samferdsel;mertil tog og vei

1 0.5%

samferdselspolitikk 1 0.5%

skatte ogavgiftspolitikken

1 0.5%

skatter ogavgifter

1 0.5%

skole 7 3.2%

skolen 1 0.5%

skolepolitikken 2 0.9%

skolesatsing 1 0.5%

sosialsektoren 1 0.5%

staten får styre 1 0.5%

stoppet vekstenav private skoler

1 0.5%

syselsetting 1 0.5%

sysselsetting 2 0.9%

sysselsettinga 1 0.5%

tilgj.bruk avpc - gratisskolebøker ivideregående

1 0.5%

trygder 1 0.5%

tryggearbeidsplasser

1 0.5%

u-hjelp 1 0.5%

uhjelpspolitikken 1 0.5%

utbygging avsykehjem

1 0.5%

utdaning 1 0.5%

utdanning 2 0.9%

utenrikspoletikk 1 0.5%

utenrikspolitikk 1 0.5%

utenrikspolitikkstøre flink

1 0.5%

utenrikspolitikken 1 0.5%

utrikspolitikk 1 0.5%

vei 1 0.5%

veiutbygging 1 0.5%

Page 257: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 257 -

# v168: Area 3 governm. did a good job

Value Label Cases Percentage

xxx 1 0.5%

Økonomi 1 0.5%

Økonomiskpolitikk

1 0.5%

Økonomistyring 1 0.5%

økonomi 1 0.5%

økonomiskpolitikk

1 0.5%

økt barnehageantallet 1 0.5%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v169: Areas where the red - green government has done a poor job

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Is there a special area where you think the red - green government has done a poor job?

Interviewer's instructions To the interviewer: Open question. Tick the most appropriate in relation to the respondent's answer - it is allowed forrespondents to mention several areas.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 1099 61.7%

2 No 617 34.6%

8 Won't answer 8 0.4%

9 Don't know 58 3.3%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v170: Area 1 governm. did a poor job

Information [Type= discrete] [Format=character] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1099 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Is there a special area where you think the red - green government has done a poor job?

... A. Area 1

Interviewer's instructions To the interviewer: Open question. Tick the most appropriate in relation to the respondent's answer - it is allowed forrespondents to mention several areas.

Value Label Cases Percentage

"nedlagt" detnorske forsvaret

1 0.1%

(8) nekter/vilikke svare

1 0.1%

(9) vet ikke 6 0.5%

ASYLPOLITIKK 1 0.1%

Afganistan 2 0.2%

Alt 1 0.1%

Arb.ledighet 1 0.1%

Arbeidsledighet 1 0.1%

Arbeidsledigheta 1 0.1%

Arbeidsledigheten 2 0.2%

Asylpolitikken 2 0.2%

Page 258: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 258 -

# v170: Area 1 governm. did a poor job

Value Label Cases Percentage

Avkritningen avnorge

1 0.1%

Barn 1 0.1%

Barnehage 1 0.1%

Behandlingsgaranti/sykehus

1 0.1%

Betingelser forbedriftene

1 0.1%

Boligpolitikken 1 0.1%

Budsjett 1 0.1%

De har fjernetde kristnegrunnverdiene

1 0.1%

De har gjort endårlig jobb på alt

1 0.1%

Distriktspol. 1 0.1%

Dårligutrusting avgrunn-+videreg.skoler

1 0.1%

ELDREOMSORG 1 0.1%

ELDREOMSORGEN 2 0.2%

Ekteskapsloven 3 0.3%

Eldre 4 0.4%

Eldreomsorg 8 0.7%

Eldreomsorg- hjelpeNordmenn

1 0.1%

Eldreomsorgen 7 0.6%

Eldrepolitikk 2 0.2%

Eldrepolitikken 2 0.2%

Eldromsorg/sykehjemsplasser

1 0.1%

Endringer i pensjonsordningen 1 0.1%

Familiepolitikk 1 0.1%

Fattidom 1 0.1%

Fattigdom 5 0.5%

Fattigdomsbekjempelse 2 0.2%

Fattigdomsbekjempelsen 1 0.1%

Fattigdomspolitikk 1 0.1%

Fattigdomsproblematikk 2 0.2%

Fattigdomsspørsmålet 1 0.1%

Finanspolitikk 2 0.2%

Fjerning avkontantstøtten

1 0.1%

Flere statligeansatte

1 0.1%

For litrn fokuspå krisendomsundervisning

1 0.1%

Page 259: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 259 -

# v170: Area 1 governm. did a poor job

Value Label Cases Percentage

i skole ogbarnehage

For mangeinnvandrere

1 0.1%

For myehøyre-ideologi

1 0.1%

For mye internkritikk

1 0.1%

Formueskatten 1 0.1%

Forskning 3 0.3%

Forskning,hvileskjær.

1 0.1%

Forsvar 2 0.2%

Forsvarspolitikk 1 0.1%

Forsvarspolitikken 2 0.2%

Generellnæringsutvikling

1 0.1%

HAR IKKEHOLDTLØFTET OMCO2 RENSINGGENERELT

1 0.1%

HELSE 1 0.1%

HELSE OGSOSIAL

1 0.1%

HELSEPOLITIKKEN 2 0.2%

Helse 18 1.6%

Helse og omsorg 1 0.1%

Helse og omsorgstrjenesten 1 0.1%

Helse ogsykehus

1 0.1%

Helse os sosial 1 0.1%

Helse,helseforetakenelider

1 0.1%

Helse-Eldrepolitikk

1 0.1%

Helse/sykehusreformen

1 0.1%

Helse7sosial 1 0.1%

Helsepolitikk 5 0.5%

Helsepolitikken 4 0.4%

Helsepolitikkener feilslått

1 0.1%

Helsesektoren 3 0.3%

Helsevesenet 2 0.2%

INDUSTRIPOLITIKKEN 1 0.1%

INNVANDRINGSPOLITIKKEN 2 0.2%

Infrastruktur - kollektivtrafikken 1 0.1%

Innvandrerpolitikken 1 0.1%

Page 260: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 260 -

# v170: Area 1 governm. did a poor job

Value Label Cases Percentage

Innvandring 15 1.4%

Innvandring.Stille større krav

1 0.1%

Innvandring/flyktningepolitikken

1 0.1%

Innvandringspolitikk 3 0.3%

Innvandringspolitikken 8 0.7%

Integrering 1 0.1%

Inten konflikt,handlinglammelse 1 0.1%

Intergrering 1 0.1%

Intern poletikk 1 0.1%

Invandringspolitikk 1 0.1%

Involvering iAfghanistan

1 0.1%

Jernbane 1 0.1%

Justispolitikk 1 0.1%

KRIMINALPOLITIKKEN 1 0.1%

Klima 3 0.3%

Klima - Miljø 1 0.1%

Klimapolitikk 1 0.1%

Klimapolitikken 2 0.2%

Kollektiv trafikk 1 0.1%

Kollektivtransport 1 0.1%

Kommuneøkonomi 1 0.1%

Krigen iAfganistan

1 0.1%

Kriminalomsorgen 1 0.1%

Kultur 1 0.1%

Landbruk 1 0.1%

Loven om brukav hijab

1 0.1%

MILJØ 1 0.1%

MILJØPOLITIKKEN 1 0.1%

Miljø 13 1.2%

Miljø klima 1 0.1%

Miljø politikken 1 0.1%

Miljøvern 2 0.2%

Mulla Krekar 1 0.1%

Mullar Krekar 1 0.1%

NSB 1 0.1%

NYE EKTESKAPSLOVEN 1 0.1%

Nav reformen 1 0.1%

Norges rolle iAfghanistan

1 0.1%

Norsk asyl og innvandringspolitikk 1 0.1%

Page 261: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 261 -

# v170: Area 1 governm. did a poor job

Value Label Cases Percentage

Næringspolitikk 1 0.1%

Næringsutvikling 1 0.1%

Olje-oggassutvinning

1 0.1%

Omsorgs-sektoren

1 0.1%

Partnerskapsloven 1 0.1%

Pengebruk 1 0.1%

Pensjon 1 0.1%

Privatebarnehagersøkonomi

1 0.1%

Rovdyrforvaltning 1 0.1%

Rovdyrpolitikk 1 0.1%

Rovdyrpolitikken 3 0.3%

Rovviltproblematikken 1 0.1%

SAMFERDSEL 5 0.5%

SKOLE OGUTDANNING

1 0.1%

SKOLEPOLITKK 1 0.1%

SMÅINDUSTRI 1 0.1%

SYKELØNN 1 0.1%

Sa mferdsel 1 0.1%

SamarbeidNorden

1 0.1%

Samferdsel 18 1.6%

Samferdselk 1 0.1%

Samferdselspolitikkeni distriktene

1 0.1%

Sikring av industriarbeidsplasser 1 0.1%

Skatt 2 0.2%

Skatt og avgift 1 0.1%

Skatte- ogavgiftspolitikken

1 0.1%

Skatter ogavgifter

1 0.1%

Skole 11 1.0%

Skole ogutdanning

1 0.1%

Skole/utdanning 1 0.1%

Skolen 1 0.1%

Skolepolitikk 5 0.5%

Skolepolitikken 3 0.3%

Skolepolitikken/utdanning

1 0.1%

Skolepolitisk 1 0.1%

Slepphendt innvandringspolitikk 1 0.1%

Page 262: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 262 -

# v170: Area 1 governm. did a poor job

Value Label Cases Percentage

Statens utgifter 1 0.1%

Statlig eierskapav bedrifter

1 0.1%

Studentpolitikk 1 0.1%

Syke og eldre 1 0.1%

Sykehjem 1 0.1%

Sykehjem foralle

1 0.1%

Sykehus 2 0.2%

Sykelønnsordning 1 0.1%

Sysselsetting 1 0.1%

Tomtefestespørsmål 1 0.1%

Undervisning 1 0.1%

Utbygging avgasskraftverk

1 0.1%

Utdanning 3 0.3%

Utdanning,forskning

1 0.1%

Utenriks-nordområdene

1 0.1%

Utenrikspolitikk 1 0.1%

VEIER 1 0.1%

Vei 1 0.1%

Veier 2 0.2%

Veinettet 1 0.1%

Veipolitikken 1 0.1%

Viesatsing 1 0.1%

altfor høgeavgifter,og formange.

1 0.1%

arbeidplasser,utflagging

1 0.1%

arbeidsledighet 3 0.3%

arbeidsledigheten 2 0.2%

arbeidsliv 1 0.1%

arbeidsplasser 1 0.1%

asylpolitikk 2 0.2%

asylpolitikken 6 0.5%

asylpolitikken, 1 0.1%

asylpolitikken/innvandringen

1 0.1%

asylpolitkken 1 0.1%

asylsøk. 1 0.1%

avgiftspolitikk 2 0.2%

avgiftspolitikken 1 0.1%

avkristningen avNorge

1 0.1%

Page 263: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 263 -

# v170: Area 1 governm. did a poor job

Value Label Cases Percentage

avskaffing avfattigdommen

1 0.1%

barne / familiepolitikken 1 0.1%

barne ogskolepol

1 0.1%

barnehage 2 0.2%

barnehage/skole 1 0.1%

barnehagedekning 1 0.1%

barnehagedekning,eldreomsorg 1 0.1%

barnehagedekningen 1 0.1%

barnehagepriser 1 0.1%

barnehager 1 0.1%

barnehageutbygging 1 0.1%

barnepolitikk 1 0.1%

barnevern 1 0.1%

bedreintegrering aviannvandrere

1 0.1%

bedriftspolitikk 1 0.1%

begrensefattigdom

1 0.1%

begrensepengebruken

1 0.1%

bekjempelse avarbeidsledig

1 0.1%

bekjempelse avfattigdom

1 0.1%

bilveier 1 0.1%

biodiesel 1 0.1%

biodieselsaken 1 0.1%

biodisel m.avgift

1 0.1%

biodiselavgift 1 0.1%

boligpolitikk 1 0.1%

bomfinansiering 1 0.1%

bompenger 1 0.1%

boplikt 1 0.1%

det vart lovtgratis ferje,forbedring avveier

1 0.1%

distrikspolitikken 1 0.1%

distriktspolitikkgenerelt

1 0.1%

distriktspolitikken 1 0.1%

dristriktpolitikk 1 0.1%

dårlegintegrering avinnvandrere

1 0.1%

Page 264: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 264 -

# v170: Area 1 governm. did a poor job

Value Label Cases Percentage

dårligkraftutbyggind

1 0.1%

dårlig u hjelpordninger

1 0.1%

dårlige veier 1 0.1%

ekkteskapsloven 1 0.1%

ekteskap mellomhomofile

1 0.1%

ekteskapslova 1 0.1%

ekteskapsloven 5 0.5%

eldre og syke 1 0.1%

eldrebølgen 2 0.2%

eldrebølgen harde ikke takla

1 0.1%

eldreomsorg 29 2.6%

eldreomsorg,sykehuskøene

1 0.1%

eldreomsorgen 23 2.1%

eldreonsorg 1 0.1%

eldrepol 1 0.1%

eldrepolitikk 4 0.4%

eldrepolitikken 2 0.2%

energi 2 0.2%

fam politikk 1 0.1%

familie politik 1 0.1%

fatigdom 2 0.2%

fatigdom ogeldreomsorg

1 0.1%

fattigdom 3 0.3%

fattigdom inorge

1 0.1%

fattigdombekjempelse 1 0.1%

fattigdomsbekjempelse iNorge

1 0.1%

fattigdomsavskaffelsen 1 0.1%

fattigdomsbekjempelse 4 0.4%

fattigdomsbekjempelsen 6 0.5%

fattigdomspolitikken 1 0.1%

fattigdomsproblematikken 2 0.2%

fattigdomsproblemet 2 0.2%

fattigdomssp. 1 0.1%

fattige 2 0.2%

fattige i Norge 1 0.1%

fattige i norge 1 0.1%

fattighetspol.,innvavdringpol,eldreoms.

1 0.1%

Page 265: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 265 -

# v170: Area 1 governm. did a poor job

Value Label Cases Percentage

fattingdomsområde 1 0.1%

finans 2 0.2%

finansekrisen 1 0.1%

fiskeripolitikken 1 0.1%

fjerne fattigdom 1 0.1%

fjernetkristenfagene iskole

1 0.1%

flykninmgepol 1 0.1%

flyktige- 1 0.1%

for bedrifter 1 0.1%

for dårlige veier 1 0.1%

for langt iBarentshavet -olje

1 0.1%

for lite på infrastruktur-vei ogsv

1 0.1%

for liteøremerketmidler til barnog eldre

1 0.1%

for liten satsingpå miljø

1 0.1%

for mange blirtrygdet

1 0.1%

for mye avgifter 1 0.1%

for myeinnvandring

1 0.1%

for mye pengerpå kultur

1 0.1%

for myeutbygging avbyråkratiet

1 0.1%

for slapp innvandrinspolitikk 1 0.1%

for slepphendt i innvandringspolitikken 1 0.1%

fordeling 1 0.1%

foreldrepermisjonsordning

1 0.1%

forholdet tilEuropa

1 0.1%

forkning, undervisn.universitetog høyskoler

1 0.1%

fornybar energi 1 0.1%

forskjell mellomog fattig

1 0.1%

forskning 2 0.2%

forskningog høyereutdanning

1 0.1%

forskning ogutvikl

1 0.1%

Page 266: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 266 -

# v170: Area 1 governm. did a poor job

Value Label Cases Percentage

forskningundervisning

1 0.1%

forsvaret 2 0.2%

forsvarpolitikken 1 0.1%

forsvars 1 0.1%

full barnehagedekning 2 0.2%

få orden påsykehuset

1 0.1%

generelt overhele linja

1 0.1%

gjennomførbarhetav valgløfter

1 0.1%

har gjort endårlig jobbgenerelt.

1 0.1%

har ikke holdtsine løfter om åsatse på miljø

1 0.1%

helheten avpolitikken

1 0.1%

helse 25 2.3%

helse ogeldreomsorg

2 0.2%

helse og omsorg 2 0.2%

helse og sosial 1 0.1%

helse ogsosialpoitikk

1 0.1%

helsepengeunderskoti sjukehusa,ventetid

1 0.1%

helse, sykehus 1 0.1%

helse-omsorg 1 0.1%

helsefortakene 1 0.1%

helsepol 1 0.1%

helsepolitik 1 0.1%

helsepolitikk 2 0.2%

helsepolitikk -eldrepolitikk

1 0.1%

helsepolitikken 2 0.2%

helsepolitkken 1 0.1%

helsesektor 1 0.1%

helsesektoren 2 0.2%

helsesektorenfor lite ivaretatt

1 0.1%

helseutvikling , sykehussentralisering 1 0.1%

helsevesen 2 0.2%

helsevesenet 5 0.5%

hese og sosial 1 0.1%

1 0.1%

Page 267: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 267 -

# v170: Area 1 governm. did a poor job

Value Label Cases Percentage

homofileekteskapsvelsignelse ikirka

håndterekriminaliteten,

1 0.1%

håndtering av fattigdomsspørsmålet 1 0.1%

håndtert innvandringspilitikkendårlig

1 0.1%

høy prisstigning 1 0.1%

høyanger årdal 1 0.1%

høyereutdanning /forskning

1 0.1%

ikke styrket velferdstilbudenenok

1 0.1%

individenesvalgfrihet

1 0.1%

industri 3 0.3%

industripolitikk 1 0.1%

infrastruktur 1 0.1%

innen helse ogomsorg

1 0.1%

innen utdanningspolitikk 1 0.1%

innenfor detøkonimiske omr

1 0.1%

innsats for øktforskning

1 0.1%

innvandirngspolitikken 1 0.1%

innvandrer- ogasylpolitikken

1 0.1%

innvandrer/asylpolitikken

1 0.1%

innvandrerpolitikk 1 0.1%

innvandring 24 2.2%

innvandring ogfattige barn

1 0.1%

innvandring ogintegrering

1 0.1%

innvandring-integrering

1 0.1%

innvandringen 1 0.1%

innvandringpolitikk 1 0.1%

innvandrings-og integreringspolit. 1 0.1%

innvandringspoletikk 2 0.2%

innvandringspolitik 1 0.1%

innvandringspolitikk 7 0.6%

innvandringspolitikken 15 1.4%

1 0.1%

Page 268: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 268 -

# v170: Area 1 governm. did a poor job

Value Label Cases Percentage

innvandringspolitikkenskulle værtstrengere

innvandringspolitikkenute av kontroll

1 0.1%

innvandringspolitkk 1 0.1%

innvandringspolitkken 1 0.1%

innvandrinspolitikken 1 0.1%

innvansring 1 0.1%

integrasjon 1 0.1%

integrering 1 0.1%

integrering avinnvandrere

1 0.1%

integreringspolitikk 1 0.1%

integreringspolitikken 2 0.2%

internasjonalesaker

1 0.1%

invandrerpolitikk 1 0.1%

invandring 1 0.1%

invandring,(forstor invadring)

1 0.1%

invandringsp. 1 0.1%

justis 2 0.2%

justisen 1 0.1%

justispolitikk 1 0.1%

justispolitikken 1 0.1%

justissektoren 1 0.1%

kirkelisammenheng

1 0.1%

kirkepolitikken 1 0.1%

klima 7 0.6%

klima spørsmål 1 0.1%

klimasaken 1 0.1%

kolektivtrafikken

1 0.1%

kollektivtrafikk 1 0.1%

kollektivtrafikken 2 0.2%

kollektivtransport 1 0.1%

kommuneøkonomi

1 0.1%

kommunepolitikkmer penger

1 0.1%

kommuneøkonomi 1 0.1%

kommunikajson 1 0.1%

kommunikasjon/transport

1 0.1%

kontantstøtte 1 0.1%

Page 269: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 269 -

# v170: Area 1 governm. did a poor job

Value Label Cases Percentage

kratregime 1 0.1%

krekar 1 0.1%

krigen iafghanistan

1 0.1%

kriminalitet 2 0.2%

kriminalitetsbekjempelse 1 0.1%

kriminalpolitikk 1 0.1%

kriminalpolitikken 1 0.1%

krisepakken 1 0.1%

kristendommen 1 0.1%

kultur 1 0.1%

kulturpolitikk 1 0.1%

kulturpolitikken 1 0.1%

kunnskapsløftet 1 0.1%

kunnskapsløftet,skole

1 0.1%

kutter trygdafor giftepensjonister

1 0.1%

landbruk 1 0.1%

landbrukspolitikk 1 0.1%

legge til rettefor barn mspessielle behov

1 0.1%

likelønn 1 0.1%

likelønnklasseskille

1 0.1%

likelønnmenn/kvinneret.utdanning

1 0.1%

likestilling foralle

1 0.1%

lite enhetligopptreden imedia

1 0.1%

lite satsing påfornybar energi

1 0.1%

lovet formye,flere henderi helsevesenet

1 0.1%

læreplanen/familie

1 0.1%

løftebrudd 1 0.1%

mange områder kommer,kommerikke på nå

1 0.1%

manglendeveiutbygging

1 0.1%

mangler vann ibassenge

1 0.1%

1 0.1%

Page 270: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 270 -

# v170: Area 1 governm. did a poor job

Value Label Cases Percentage

meningsløsavlatsholdningmed klimakvoter

mer fokus påmiljø

1 0.1%

militær 1 0.1%

miljø 30 2.7%

miljø / klima 1 0.1%

miljø bilavgiftene

1 0.1%

miljø politikk 1 0.1%

miljø/klimapolitikken

1 0.1%

miljødielsel etc 1 0.1%

miljøpolitikk 1 0.1%

miljøpolitikken 1 0.1%

miljøsiden 1 0.1%

miljøvern påhjemmebane

1 0.1%

minskefattigdommen

1 0.1%

minstetrygd 1 0.1%

mullakrekarsaken

1 0.1%

mye internekonflikter

1 0.1%

naturvern, er forettergivende forpressgrupper,ekstremister

1 0.1%

nav reformen 1 0.1%

nav-reformen 1 0.1%

nepotisme 1 0.1%

nnvandringspolitikken 1 0.1%

ny teknologi 1 0.1%

næringsliv 2 0.2%

næringslivet 1 0.1%

næringspolitikk 2 0.2%

næringspolitikken 1 0.1%

oLJE OG GASS 1 0.1%

oljeaktivitetensnivå

1 0.1%

oljesektoren 1 0.1%

opprydding avoljesøl

1 0.1%

pensjon 1 0.1%

pensjonistforliketfor dårlig

1 0.1%

pensjonsfondet 1 0.1%

Page 271: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 271 -

# v170: Area 1 governm. did a poor job

Value Label Cases Percentage

pleie/omsorg.lite forpliktende

1 0.1%

politikrisen 1 0.1%

preget avmisunnelse

1 0.1%

psykiatri 1 0.1%

psykiskhelse,psykiatri

1 0.1%

rasfare- dårligeveier

1 0.1%

reguleringen avmediene

1 0.1%

rotete utad 1 0.1%

rovdyrpolitikken 1 0.1%

rusomsorg 1 0.1%

røkkesaken 1 0.1%

samarbeidm.ap ogsv.klimaspørsm

1 0.1%

samfedsel 1 0.1%

samferdel 1 0.1%

samferdsel 73 6.6%

samferdsel ,vedlikehold

1 0.1%

samferdsel, ikkjefå gratis ferjeosv...

1 0.1%

samferdsel,veivedlikehold

1 0.1%

samferdsel-veier

1 0.1%

samferdsel/vei 1 0.1%

samferdselspolitikk 2 0.2%

samfersel 1 0.1%

satsingpå høyereutdanning

1 0.1%

se vedlegg 1 0.1%

selvstnæringsdriv kår

1 0.1%

sjukehuskø-/helsevesen

1 0.1%

skastterpol. 1 0.1%

skatt 4 0.4%

skatt avgift 1 0.1%

skatt og avgift 3 0.3%

skatt og avgifter 1 0.1%

skatt/avgifter 1 0.1%

skatte og avgift 1 0.1%

Page 272: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 272 -

# v170: Area 1 governm. did a poor job

Value Label Cases Percentage

skatte- ognæringspolitikk

1 0.1%

skattepolitikk 3 0.3%

skattepolitikkmer tile de rike

1 0.1%

skattepolitikkoverfor små/mellomstorebedrifter)

1 0.1%

skattepolitikken 3 0.3%

skattepolitkkken 1 0.1%

skatter 1 0.1%

skatter ogavgifter

4 0.4%

skattespørsmål 1 0.1%

skole 35 3.2%

skole /undervisning

1 0.1%

skole ogundervisning

1 0.1%

skole ogutdannelse

1 0.1%

skole ogutdanning

5 0.5%

skoleundervisning

1 0.1%

skole, utd.,forskning

1 0.1%

skole/utdannelse 1 0.1%

skolemat 1 0.1%

skolemiljø 1 0.1%

skolen 1 0.1%

skolene 1 0.1%

skoleog utdanningspolitikken 1 0.1%

skolepolitikk 9 0.8%

skolepolitikken 11 1.0%

skolepolitikken;forlite ressurser

1 0.1%

skolepolitkk 1 0.1%

skolesaken, ikkeskjedd så myesom de lovet

1 0.1%

skolesektor 1 0.1%

skolesenktoren 1 0.1%

skule 1 0.1%

skulepolitikken 1 0.1%

smaferdsel 1 0.1%

snøhvitfeltet 1 0.1%

sosial politikk 1 0.1%

Page 273: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 273 -

# v170: Area 1 governm. did a poor job

Value Label Cases Percentage

sparing tilpensjon

1 0.1%

statlig eierskap 1 0.1%

stortingetoverflødiggjort

1 0.1%

svak på innvandrinspolitikken 1 0.1%

sykehiskøer 1 0.1%

sykehjemplass-sykehus-

1 0.1%

sykehus 1 0.1%

sykehusreformen 1 0.1%

sykehusøkonomien 1 0.1%

sysselsetting 1 0.1%

sysselsetting offsektor

1 0.1%

trygdeordningene 1 0.1%

trygdevesnet 1 0.1%

uenighet innad iregjeringen

1 0.1%

ukontrolertutbyggingbarnehager

1 0.1%

ukritiskpengebruk

1 0.1%

undervisning/forskning

1 0.1%

utbygging av sjukeheimsplasser 1 0.1%

utbygging avveier

2 0.2%

utdanning 6 0.5%

utdanningj 1 0.1%

utdannings 1 0.1%

utdanningspolitikk 1 0.1%

utfllaggin abbedrifter-arb.ledighet

1 0.1%

utidige skatter 1 0.1%

utkantstrøka 1 0.1%

utviskestatskirken

1 0.1%

vann isvømmehallene

1 0.1%

vannkraftutbygging 1 0.1%

vedlikehold avoffentlige bygg

1 0.1%

vedlikehold pånorske veier

1 0.1%

vegane 1 0.1%

veger, sjukeheimsplasser 1 0.1%

Page 274: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 274 -

# v170: Area 1 governm. did a poor job

Value Label Cases Percentage

vei 2 0.2%

vei utbedringvedlikhold nye

1 0.1%

vei, samferdsel 1 0.1%

veiane 1 0.1%

veibygging 2 0.2%

veiene 1 0.1%

veier 2 0.2%

veinettet 1 0.1%

veinettet erunderprioritert idistriktene

1 0.1%

veipolitikk -klatter

1 0.1%

veisektoren 1 0.1%

veistandard 1 0.1%

veiutbygging 9 0.8%

veiutbygging ogvedlikehold avveinettet

1 0.1%

velferdsordningen,nav

1 0.1%

vern av troederovdyr

1 0.1%

vernesaker 1 0.1%

vernesida 1 0.1%

ØKONOMISKEPOLITIKKE

1 0.1%

Økonomien -landets ø.

1 0.1%

Økonomiskpolitikk

1 0.1%

å begrenseinnvandring

1 0.1%

åpne for myemuslimskeinnflytelse

1 0.1%

økonomi 1 0.1%

økonomi &finans

1 0.1%

Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v171: Area 2 governm. did a poor job

Information [Type= discrete] [Format=character] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=658 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Is there a special area where you think the red - green government has done a poor job?

... B. Area 2

Interviewer's instructions To the interviewer: Open question. Tick the most appropriate in relation to the respondent's answer - it is allowed forrespondents to mention several areas.

Page 275: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 275 -

# v171: Area 2 governm. did a poor job

Value Label Cases Percentage

(8) nekter/vilikke svare

1 0.2%

(9) vet ikke 11 1.7%

, 1 0.2%

.forspilt pengene 1 0.2%

0 2 0.3%

Aldersboliger 1 0.2%

Antall trygdede 1 0.2%

Arbeidsledighet 1 0.2%

Asylpolitikk 1 0.2%

Avgiftspolitikk 1 0.2%

Avgiftspolitikken 1 0.2%

Barnehageutbygging 1 0.2%

Begrenseinnvandring

1 0.2%

Beholde flerebedrifter i Norge

1 0.2%

Brukt for litepenger på skole

1 0.2%

Deler av invandringspolitikken 1 0.2%

Distriktspolitikk 1 0.2%

Distriktspolitikken 1 0.2%

Dårlig forbredtpå eldrebølgen

1 0.2%

ELDREOMSORG 1 0.2%

ELDREPOLITIKKEN 1 0.2%

ENERGIPOLITIKKEN 1 0.2%

EU 1 0.2%

Eldeomsorg 1 0.2%

Eldre 3 0.5%

Eldreomsorg 12 1.8%

Eldreomsorg, forlite enerom påsykehjem

1 0.2%

Eldreomsorgen 3 0.5%

Eldreomsprgen 1 0.2%

Eldrepolitikken 1 0.2%

Eldres kår 1 0.2%

Familiepolitikken 1 0.2%

Fattigdombekjempelse 1 0.2%

Fattigdomspolitikk 1 0.2%

Fattigdomsspørsmålet 1 0.2%

Fattige i Norge 1 0.2%

Finanspolitikken 1 0.2%

Fjerne ulovligeinnvandrere

1 0.2%

Page 276: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 276 -

# v171: Area 2 governm. did a poor job

Value Label Cases Percentage

For dårligeldreomsorg

1 0.2%

For liteoljeutvinning

1 0.2%

For stor satsingpå offentligsektor

1 0.2%

Forberedeeldrebølgen

1 0.2%

Forskning 3 0.5%

Friskolene 1 0.2%

HELSE 2 0.3%

HELSEPOLITIKKEN 1 0.2%

HELSEVESENET 1 0.2%

Helepolitikk 1 0.2%

Helse 4 0.6%

Helse og sosial 1 0.2%

Helse ogsosialpolitikk

1 0.2%

Helsepolitikk 1 0.2%

Helsereformer 1 0.2%

Helsesektoren 1 0.2%

Helsevesenet 1 0.2%

INDUSTRIKRAFTREGIMET 1 0.2%

INNVANDRINGSPOLITIKKEN 1 0.2%

Innenrikspolitikk 1 0.2%

Innvandring 11 1.7%

Innvandringspolitikk 1 0.2%

Innvandringspolitikken 3 0.5%

Invandring 1 0.2%

Israelspolitikken 1 0.2%

Jernbane 1 0.2%

Justispolitikk 1 0.2%

KLIMA-BRUKOG KAST

1 0.2%

Kollektivtrafikk 1 0.2%

Kollektivtransport 1 0.2%

Kommuneøkonomi 1 0.2%

Kontantstøtte 1 0.2%

LANDBRUKSPOLITIKKEN 1 0.2%

Likelønn 1 0.2%

Likelønnspolitikk 1 0.2%

Likestilling 1 0.2%

Lønn tilhelsearbeidere

1 0.2%

MILJØ 1 0.2%

Page 277: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 277 -

# v171: Area 2 governm. did a poor job

Value Label Cases Percentage

MILJØPOLITIKK 1 0.2%

Miljø 2 0.3%

Miljøspørsmål 1 0.2%

Miljøvern 2 0.3%

Motvilje tilbruk av privatehelsetjenester

1 0.2%

NAV reformen 2 0.3%

NAV-reformen 1 0.2%

Nyskapning 1 0.2%

Næringspolitikk 1 0.2%

Oljeboring iLofoten ogVesterålen

1 0.2%

Politiet 1 0.2%

Politisaker 1 0.2%

Redriskatt 1 0.2%

Rus kontroll -Trafikk

1 0.2%

SAMFERDSEL 2 0.3%

SAMFERDSELSPOLITIKKEN 1 0.2%

SKATTEPOLITIKKEN 1 0.2%

SKOLEPOLITIKK 1 0.2%

SYKEHUPOLITIKKEN 1 0.2%

Samfedsel 1 0.2%

Samferdsel 11 1.7%

Sentralisering avsykehus og politi

1 0.2%

Skatt og avgifter 1 0.2%

Skatt vanligefolk

1 0.2%

Skattepolitikk 1 0.2%

Skatter ogavgifter

1 0.2%

Skogbruk 1 0.2%

Skole 10 1.5%

Skole -Utdanning

1 0.2%

Skole ogBarnehager

1 0.2%

Skole og utdanningspolitikken 1 0.2%

Skole, bederstruktur i undervisningen+respektlærere

1 0.2%

Skole/Samferdsel

1 0.2%

Skolen 1 0.2%

Skolepolitikk 1 0.2%

Page 278: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 278 -

# v171: Area 2 governm. did a poor job

Value Label Cases Percentage

Sosialpolitikken 2 0.3%

Sykeheimplasser 1 0.2%

Sykehus 1 0.2%

Sykehuspol. 1 0.2%

Sykelønnsordningen 1 0.2%

Trafikk 1 0.2%

UTENRIKSPOLITIKK 1 0.2%

Udanning 1 0.2%

Undervisning 1 0.2%

Utdanning 1 0.2%

Utdanning forlite fokus

1 0.2%

Utenlandspolitikk 1 0.2%

Utenrikspolotikk 1 0.2%

Utleveringsavtaler 1 0.2%

Vei/Samferdsel 1 0.2%

Veibygging 1 0.2%

Veibygging/vedlikehold

1 0.2%

Veivedlikehold 1 0.2%

arbeidsledighet 1 0.2%

arbeidsledighetskampen, 1 0.2%

arbeidsplasser 1 0.2%

arveskatt 1 0.2%

asylmottak-inntregering formange inn

1 0.2%

asylpolitikk 1 0.2%

asylpolitikken 1 0.2%

asylpolitikkenfor slepphendt

1 0.2%

asylsøkere 1 0.2%

avgifter 1 0.2%

avgiftpolitik 1 0.2%

avgiftspolitikken 1 0.2%

barn og unge 1 0.2%

barnefamilier 1 0.2%

barnehage 3 0.5%

barnehage tilbudfungerte dårlig

1 0.2%

barnehagedekking 1 0.2%

barnehagedekkningdet første året

1 0.2%

barnehagedekning 1 0.2%

barnehagene 1 0.2%

barnehageplasser 1 0.2%

Page 279: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 279 -

# v171: Area 2 governm. did a poor job

Value Label Cases Percentage

barnehager 1 0.2%

basseng påskoler

1 0.2%

bekjempelse avfattigdom

1 0.2%

bevilger for litetil universiteter

1 0.2%

biodiesel-avgiftsbelegge

1 0.2%

bompenger 1 0.2%

bruken avpenger /effektivitet

1 0.2%

co2-kraftverk 1 0.2%

de har gått merbort ifra kristneverdier

1 0.2%

distrikspolitikken 1 0.2%

distriksts- 1 0.2%

distrikts politikk 1 0.2%

distriktspoletikk 1 0.2%

dårleg landbrukspolitikk 1 0.2%

dårligeldreomsorg

1 0.2%

dårligskolepolitikk

1 0.2%

dårlig veinett iNorge

1 0.2%

dårligveivedlikehold

1 0.2%

dårlige veier 1 0.2%

ekteskapsloven 2 0.3%

ekteskapslovgivning 1 0.2%

elderomsorg 1 0.2%

eldre 2 0.3%

eldre omsorgen 1 0.2%

eldreoms 1 0.2%

eldreomsorg 21 3.2%

eldreomsorgen 6 0.9%

eldreomsorgenikke blitt myebedre

1 0.2%

eldrepol 1 0.2%

eldrepolitikk 3 0.5%

eldrepolitikken 5 0.8%

energi 1 0.2%

energipolitikk 1 0.2%

er dårlige påkristne verdier

1 0.2%

Page 280: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 280 -

# v171: Area 2 governm. did a poor job

Value Label Cases Percentage

familie, innvandringssaker 1 0.2%

familiepolitikk 2 0.3%

familiepolitikken 2 0.3%

fattidommen 1 0.2%

fattigbekjempelse 1 0.2%

fattigdom 1 0.2%

fattigdombekjempelse 1 0.2%

fattigdomsbekjempelse 2 0.3%

fattigdomspolitikk 1 0.2%

fattigdomsproblemet 1 0.2%

feil flytteforsvarethovedkvarterflytting til bodø

1 0.2%

fikseripolitikk 1 0.2%

finanspolitikk 1 0.2%

fjerne støtten tilfrivillige org.

1 0.2%

flykning 1 0.2%

flyktningepolitikken 1 0.2%

for dårligveiutbygging/veivedlikehold

1 0.2%

for få sykeheimsplasser 1 0.2%

for lite fokus påtrygd

1 0.2%

for lite folk ipolitiet og toll

1 0.2%

for liteoverføring tilkommuner

1 0.2%

for lite påforskningoghøyereutdanning

1 0.2%

for lite satsingpå langsiktigforskning

1 0.2%

for lite støtte tilfriskular

1 0.2%

for lite til minstepensjonister 1 0.2%

for myeinnvandring

1 0.2%

for myepengebruk

1 0.2%

for mye trygder 1 0.2%

for svakasylpolitikk

1 0.2%

formueskatt 1 0.2%

fornybar energi 2 0.3%

Page 281: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 281 -

# v171: Area 2 governm. did a poor job

Value Label Cases Percentage

forskn ing 1 0.2%

forskning 5 0.8%

forsvar 3 0.5%

forsvaret 5 0.8%

fortsatt tommebadebassen ger

1 0.2%

grøne sertifikat 1 0.2%

helse 20 3.0%

helse og omsorg 2 0.3%

helse ogomszorg

1 0.2%

helse/eldreomsorg

1 0.2%

helseforetak 1 0.2%

helsenorge 2 0.3%

helsepolitikk 2 0.3%

helsepolitikken 4 0.6%

helsesektoren 1 0.2%

helsevesen 1 0.2%

ikke full barnehagedekning 1 0.2%

ikke klarthelsepolitikksom de sto for

1 0.2%

ikkje midler tilkommunene,forpliktelsene

1 0.2%

industrikraft 1 0.2%

industripolitikk 1 0.2%

inndustriutvikling 1 0.2%

innen forpsykisk helse

1 0.2%

innfrielse avvalgløftet

1 0.2%

inntregeringspolitikken 1 0.2%

innvandirngspolitkken 1 0.2%

innvandrerpolitikken 1 0.2%

innvandrertilbakesending 1 0.2%

innvandrin 1 0.2%

innvandring 5 0.8%

innvandringen 1 0.2%

innvandringspolitikken 7 1.1%

innvandringsprobematikken 1 0.2%

innvandringsspørsmål 2 0.3%

innvandrinspolitikken 1 0.2%

intergreing 1 0.2%

jernbanesatsing 1 0.2%

justis/politi 1 0.2%

Page 282: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 282 -

# v171: Area 2 governm. did a poor job

Value Label Cases Percentage

justispolitikk 1 0.2%

justisvesenet,for lite pengertil politi ogdomstoler

1 0.2%

kirkeligespørsmål biskopvalg

1 0.2%

kirkepol. 1 0.2%

kjøp av privatbolig

1 0.2%

klima 4 0.6%

klimapolitikk 1 0.2%

kolektiv 1 0.2%

kollektivtransport

1 0.2%

kollektivtrafikkjernbane

1 0.2%

kollektivtransport 1 0.2%

kontantstøtten 1 0.2%

korrupsjon istatlige tjenester

1 0.2%

kriminalitet 2 0.3%

kriminalitetspolitikk 1 0.2%

kriminalpolitikk 2 0.3%

kriminalpolitikken 2 0.3%

lagetfamiliefientligeekteskapslov

1 0.2%

likelønn -minstepensjon

1 0.2%

likelønnsspørsmålet 1 0.2%

liten satsingsykkel-/gangveier

1 0.2%

livssyn 1 0.2%

løftebrytinggenerelt

1 0.2%

lønn 1 0.2%

maritim næring 1 0.2%

mat i skolen 1 0.2%

miljø 8 1.2%

miljø/oljeutvinning

1 0.2%

miljøpolitikk formye co2

1 0.2%

miljøpolitikken 1 0.2%

miljøproblemet 1 0.2%

miljøvern 5 0.8%

Page 283: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 283 -

# v171: Area 2 governm. did a poor job

Value Label Cases Percentage

minus medmindrevalgfrihet iungdomsskolen

1 0.2%

moderniseringoffent.sektor

1 0.2%

mye igjen påinvandringssiden

1 0.2%

nav 1 0.2%

ned med skatterog avgifter

1 0.2%

næringspolitikk 5 0.8%

næringspolitikken 2 0.3%

offentligtransport

1 0.2%

opprettetfor mangebomstasjoner

1 0.2%

opprusting avskoler

1 0.2%

orden ipolitirekkene

1 0.2%

organisering avsykehusene

1 0.2%

politi 1 0.2%

politi & justis 1 0.2%

politiet 1 0.2%

privat /skolesom de ønskerikke bør beståsamme m/barnehageferingklinikk

1 0.2%

private skoler 1 0.2%

privatisering 1 0.2%

privatskoler 1 0.2%

privatøkonomiskesaker

1 0.2%

psykiatrien 1 0.2%

reduksjonhelsekøer

1 0.2%

resursforvaltning 1 0.2%

rovdyrforvaltning 1 0.2%

rus 1 0.2%

rusomsorg 4 0.6%

rusomsorgen 1 0.2%

ruspolitikk 1 0.2%

rusproblematikk 1 0.2%

samderdsel 1 0.2%

samferdsel 31 4.7%

Page 284: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 284 -

# v171: Area 2 governm. did a poor job

Value Label Cases Percentage

samferdsel iutkantstøk

1 0.2%

samferdsel,veiutbygging

1 0.2%

samferdselspolitikk

1 0.2%

samferdselspoltikken 1 0.2%

samferdselssektoren 1 0.2%

sammenslåingav NAV

1 0.2%

sjukehus 1 0.2%

skatt 2 0.3%

skatt avgifter 1 0.2%

skatt og avgift 1 0.2%

skatte ogavgiftspolitikken

1 0.2%

skattepol 1 0.2%

skattepolitikk 1 0.2%

skatter ogavgifter

1 0.2%

skatter-formueskatt-arveskatt

1 0.2%

skole 37 5.6%

skole ogutdannelse

1 0.2%

skole ogutdanning

6 0.9%

skole og utdanningspolitikken 1 0.2%

skole utdanning 1 0.2%

skole, barnehage 1 0.2%

skole,nedskjæringen

1 0.2%

skole- vann ibassenger

1 0.2%

skole/familiepolitikk

1 0.2%

skolen 1 0.2%

skolepolitikk 7 1.1%

skolepolitikken 8 1.2%

skolepolitikken,lover alt muligsom ikke holdes

1 0.2%

skolepolitikken;mye prat

1 0.2%

skolepoltikken 1 0.2%

skoler ogungdom

1 0.2%

skolesektor 1 0.2%

Page 285: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 285 -

# v171: Area 2 governm. did a poor job

Value Label Cases Percentage

skule 1 0.2%

skule åutdanning

1 0.2%

småbevilgninger tilsykehus

1 0.2%

sosial,eldrepol.pensjonsforliket 1 0.2%

sosiale reformer 1 0.2%

strammereasylpolitikk

1 0.2%

styring avoljefondet

1 0.2%

sykehjem ogeldreomsrog

1 0.2%

sykehus 1 0.2%

sykehusplasserog køer

1 0.2%

sykehuspolitikken 1 0.2%

sysselsetting 1 0.2%

tilretteleggingav privatearb.plasser

1 0.2%

transport /kommunikasjon

1 0.2%

trygd til eldreufør (har ike rådmedesiner

1 0.2%

undervisning 1 0.2%

undervisning(skole)

1 0.2%

utbygging avtognettet

1 0.2%

utbygging avveier

1 0.2%

utdanning 8 1.2%

utenrikspolitikk 1 0.2%

utenrikspolitikken 2 0.3%

utviklingshjelp 1 0.2%

veger 1 0.2%

vei 1 0.2%

vei og transport 1 0.2%

vei ogvedlikehold

1 0.2%

veibygging 1 0.2%

veier 3 0.5%

veier/samferdsel 1 0.2%

veinettet 1 0.2%

verdi skapning 1 0.2%

1 0.2%

Page 286: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 286 -

# v171: Area 2 governm. did a poor job

Value Label Cases Percentage

vern avkulturskatter

vindkraftutbygging

1 0.2%

ødeleggemulighetfor privatehelsetilbud

1 0.2%

økende kriminalitet,dårligoppfølging

1 0.2%

økonomiskpolitikk

1 0.2%

Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v172: Area 3 governm. did a poor job

Information [Type= discrete] [Format=character] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=306 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Is there a special area where you think the red - green government has done a poor job?

... C. Area 3

Interviewer's instructions To the interviewer: Open question. Tick the most appropriate in relation to the respondent's answer - it is allowed forrespondents to mention several areas.

Value Label Cases Percentage

"Kaos" i helsepolitikken;forliteprioriteringer.

1 0.3%

' 2 0.7%

(8) nekter/vilikke svare

1 0.3%

(9) vet ikke 4 1.3%

, 2 0.7%

.' 1 0.3%

0 1 0.3%

Barnehage 1 0.3%

Barnehage ogskole

1 0.3%

Barnehager 1 0.3%

Byråkrati iprivat næringsliv

1 0.3%

Deler avenergipolitikken

1 0.3%

Deler avmiljøpolitikken

1 0.3%

Dårligoppfølgning aveldre

1 0.3%

EU-spørsmålet 1 0.3%

Eldre 1 0.3%

Eldreomsorg 3 1.0%

Eldreomsorgen 1 0.3%

Page 287: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 287 -

# v172: Area 3 governm. did a poor job

Value Label Cases Percentage

FISKERIPOLITIKKEN 1 0.3%

Fattigdomsproblematikken

1 0.3%

Fattigdomsbekjempelse 1 0.3%

Fattigdomspolitikk 1 0.3%

Fiskeri 1 0.3%

For høye skatterog avgifter

1 0.3%

Forsvaret 1 0.3%

Helse 6 2.0%

Helsepolitikken 1 0.3%

Ikke full barnehagedekning 1 0.3%

Ikke fått utKrekar

1 0.3%

Innvadrere/asylsøkere

1 0.3%

Innvandring 4 1.3%

Innvandring,For slepphendte,og bekjempekriminalitet iforb m dette

1 0.3%

Innvandringspolitikken 1 0.3%

Justisvesenet 1 0.3%

Klima 1 0.3%

Kollektivtrafikk 1 0.3%

Kommunalpolitikk 1 0.3%

Kriminalitet- Strengerestraffer!

1 0.3%

Kriminalitetsbekjempelse 1 0.3%

Kriminalpolitikken 1 0.3%

Kristendomsundevisningi grunnskolen

1 0.3%

Kultur 1 0.3%

MILJØPOLITIKKEN 1 0.3%

Miljø 3 1.0%

Moderniseringav forvaltning

1 0.3%

NAV-reformen 1 0.3%

Nav og arbeid 1 0.3%

Næring 1 0.3%

Politi 1 0.3%

Prisnivået 1 0.3%

SAMFERDSEL 1 0.3%

SKOLE 1 0.3%

SKOLE-BEDRE 1 0.3%

SKOLEPOLITIKK 1 0.3%

Page 288: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 288 -

# v172: Area 3 governm. did a poor job

Value Label Cases Percentage

SKOLEPOLITIKKEN 1 0.3%

Samferdsel 4 1.3%

Samferdselspolitikk 1 0.3%

Skaffe flerekval. lærere

1 0.3%

Skole 4 1.3%

Skole/utdanning 2 0.7%

Skolepolitikken 1 0.3%

Sysselsetting 1 0.3%

Tollkontroll 1 0.3%

UTENRIKSPOLITIKKEN 1 0.3%

Ungdom 1 0.3%

VEI 1 0.3%

Veiutbygging 1 0.3%

Vi bør trekkeoss ut avAfghanistan !

1 0.3%

alkoholpolietikk 1 0.3%

alternativ energi 1 0.3%

arbeidsledighet 2 0.7%

arbeidsliv mertilpassa denenkelte ogsmåbarnsf

1 0.3%

asylpol 1 0.3%

asylpolikk 1 0.3%

avgifter 2 0.7%

avgiftspolitikk 1 0.3%

avgiftspolitikken 1 0.3%

barnehagedekning 1 0.3%

barnehavedekningi Oslo

1 0.3%

barnevernsaker 1 0.3%

bekjempe gjengkriminalitet 1 0.3%

de er forensporetmidtøstenpolitikk

1 0.3%

defansivnæringspolitikk

1 0.3%

deltakelse iAfganistan,internestridigheter

1 0.3%

distriksutvikling 1 0.3%

dårlig samferdeselspolotikk 1 0.3%

egge til rette for eksportnæring(utpriseross selv

1 0.3%

eldre 1 0.3%

Page 289: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 289 -

# v172: Area 3 governm. did a poor job

Value Label Cases Percentage

eldreomsorg 12 3.9%

eldreomsorgen 7 2.3%

eldrepolikkenkan forbedres

1 0.3%

eldrepolitikk 2 0.7%

eldrepolitikken 2 0.7%

familiepolitikken 1 0.3%

fattigdom 2 0.7%

fattigdomsbekjempelsen 1 0.3%

fattigdomsomsorg 1 0.3%

fattigdomsproblematikken 1 0.3%

fattigdomsproblemeter værre

1 0.3%

fattingdomspolitikkenble snakket myeom men ikkeklart gjøre noestort med

1 0.3%

fiskeripolitikk 1 0.3%

fiskeripolitikken 1 0.3%

flere privatealternativ ihelsesektoren

1 0.3%

for dårlig mht barnehagedekning 1 0.3%

for langt åavkristne norge

1 0.3%

for liteoverføriinger tilpensjonistene

1 0.3%

for lite støtte tilungdomsarbeid

1 0.3%

forbybareenergikilder

1 0.3%

fordeling avgodene

1 0.3%

forebyggekriminalitet bl.invandrere

1 0.3%

fornybar energi 1 0.3%

fornyehelsepolitikk

1 0.3%

forskning 2 0.7%

forskningspolitikk 1 0.3%

forsvar 1 0.3%

forsvarspolitikk 1 0.3%

forsvarspolitikken 1 0.3%

fri tannhelse 1 0.3%

genreltvedlikeholdoff.bygn

1 0.3%

Page 290: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 290 -

# v172: Area 3 governm. did a poor job

Value Label Cases Percentage

gjøre mer forvillaksen

1 0.3%

glemt utviklingshemmea(intregering)

1 0.3%

har ikke holdtlovnad til skoleog eldre

1 0.3%

helse 9 2.9%

helse og eldre 1 0.3%

helse/omsorg 1 0.3%

helsepolitikken 3 1.0%

helsesektor 1 0.3%

helsesektoren 1 0.3%

helsevesen 1 0.3%

helsevesnet 1 0.3%

infrastruktur 1 0.3%

innvandrerpolitikk 2 0.7%

innvandring 6 2.0%

innvandringspolitikk 1 0.3%

innvandringspolitikken;inneffektivsaksbehandling

1 0.3%

integrering 1 0.3%

integreringspolitikk 1 0.3%

intergreringspolitikk 1 0.3%

invandrerpolitikken 1 0.3%

jernbane -samferdsel

1 0.3%

justis 1 0.3%

justis-folkbør sone iopprinnelsesland

1 0.3%

kirkeligespørsmål

1 0.3%

klima 3 1.0%

klimagasser 1 0.3%

kollekivtrafikken 1 0.3%

kollektivtilbod 1 0.3%

kollektivtrafikkpå østlandet

1 0.3%

kontrolleremindre, nårde ikke kankontrollere detoffentlige

1 0.3%

krav tilinnvandrere

1 0.3%

kravløstsamfunn

1 0.3%

kriminalitet 2 0.7%

Page 291: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 291 -

# v172: Area 3 governm. did a poor job

Value Label Cases Percentage

kulturpolitikk 1 0.3%

kuttet støttetil frivilligeorganisasjoner

1 0.3%

landbrukstimulert åpnerepolitikk

1 0.3%

landbruk-rovvilt 1 0.3%

lite kritisk til FNog uSA

1 0.3%

manglendeeffektiviseringav offentligsektor

1 0.3%

media 1 0.3%

milfjø 1 0.3%

miljø 6 2.0%

miljøpolitikk 1 0.3%

miljøpolitikken 1 0.3%

miljøvern 1 0.3%

næring 1 0.3%

omlegging avhelsesystemnee

1 0.3%

oppdrettsnæring-godkjenne formmange anlegggg

1 0.3%

politi 3 1.0%

politiet 2 0.7%

prisnivå pådagligvarer

1 0.3%

ressurser tilpolitiet

1 0.3%

rettsvesenet 1 0.3%

rusmisbruk 1 0.3%

rusomsorgen 1 0.3%

samferdsel 14 4.6%

samferdselspol. 1 0.3%

samferdselspolitikk 1 0.3%

samfrdsel 1 0.3%

sikkerhet- politi 1 0.3%

skatt og avgift 1 0.3%

skatt påeiendomssalg

1 0.3%

skatt på fri kostog losji

1 0.3%

skatt/avgifter 1 0.3%

skattepolitikken 1 0.3%

skatter ogavgifter

1 0.3%

Page 292: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 292 -

# v172: Area 3 governm. did a poor job

Value Label Cases Percentage

skole 5 1.6%

skole og utdannings7forskning 1 0.3%

skole/utdanning/forskning

1 0.3%

skolepolitikk 2 0.7%

skolepolitikken 4 1.3%

slipper privatefor lite til

1 0.3%

små /mellomstorebedrifter

1 0.3%

statskirken 1 0.3%

styrking primærhelsetjenester 1 0.3%

sykehus 1 0.3%

sykehuspolitikken 1 0.3%

sykelønnsproblematikken,ser ikkerealitetene

1 0.3%

sykhuseneeldreomsorgen

1 0.3%

tilretteleggingfor små bedrifter

1 0.3%

underv.politikken 1 0.3%

utdanning 1 0.3%

utenrikspolitikk 1 0.3%

valgfrihet forsosiale tjenester

1 0.3%

veg 1 0.3%

vei 1 0.3%

veier 1 0.3%

veiutbygging,vedlikehold

1 0.3%

veiutbyggingen 1 0.3%

ventelistersykehus

1 0.3%

økonomistyring 1 0.3%

økt arbeidbyrdefører til øktsykemelding

1 0.3%

Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v173: Unemployed last four years

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-2] [Missing=*/8/9/3]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1675 /-] [Invalid=107 /-]

Literal question Have you yourself or other members of your household been unemployed during the past for years?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 297 17.7%

2 No 1378 82.3%

Page 293: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 293 -

# v173: Unemployed last four years

Value Label Cases Percentage

3 No employed in the household (pensioner, welfare-client) 96

8 Won't answer 7

9 Don't know 4Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v174: Fear of unemployment

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-3] [Missing=*/8/9]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1674 /-] [Invalid=108 /-]

Literal question Have you yourself or other members of your household been unemployed or experienced particular difficulty in getting a jobduring the past for years?

Interviewer's instructions If answeres 'yes' in spm55.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Fear unemployment 268 16.0%

2 Maybe a certain chance of unemployment 100 6.0%

3 Do not fear unemployment 1306 78.0%

8 Won't answer 7

9 Don't know 1Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v175: The red - green government has handled the crisis

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-4] [Missing=*/8/9]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1731 /-] [Invalid=51 /-]

Literal question As known, Norway too was hit by the global financial crisis the past year. How do you think the red - green government hashandled this crisis? Do you mean that it has handled it very well, fairly well, fairly bad or very bad?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Very well 571 33.0%

2 Fairly well 1032 59.6%

3 Fairly bad 108 6.2%

4 Very bad 20 1.2%

8 Won't answer 8

9 Don't know 43Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v176: Respresentatives' knowledge of people's views

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Some people say that the members of the Storting know what ordinary people think. Others say that the members ofthe Storting don't know much about what ordinary people think. Using the scale on this card, (where one means that themembers of the Storting know what ordinary people think, and five means that the members of the Storting don't know muchabout what ordinary people think), where would you place yourself?

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Use card 5.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 The members of the Storting know what ordinary people think 86 4.8%

2 2. 441 24.7%

3 3. 726 40.7%

Page 294: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 294 -

# v176: Respresentatives' knowledge of people's views

Value Label Cases Percentage

4 4. 348 19.5%

5 The members of the Storting don’t know what ordinary people think 157 8.8%

8 Won't answer 11 0.6%

9 Don't know 13 0.7%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v177: Differences between the parties at Stortinget

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question How much do you generally think that the parties in Stortinget differ from one another. Would you say that the differencesare large, quite large, not particularly large or is there not much difference at all?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Large 126 7.1%

2 Quite large 744 41.8%

3 Not particularly large 810 45.5%

4 Small 60 3.4%

8 Won't answer 10 0.6%

9 Don't know 32 1.8%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v178: Waste of tax payers' money

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Do you think that those who govern waste a large part of the money we pay in taxes, that they waste some of it, or that theyactually waste very little of this money?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 A large part 403 22.6%

2 Some 989 55.5%

3 Very little 358 20.1%

8 Won't answer 8 0.4%

9 Don't know 24 1.3%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v179: Competence of politicians

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Do you feel that most Norwegian politicians are competent people, who generally know what they are doing, or do youbelieve that many of them lack knowledge of the issues they are set to work with?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Most know what they are doing 1029 57.7%

2 Many of them lack knowledge of the issues 697 39.1%

8 Won't answer 11 0.6%

9 Don't know 45 2.5%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

Page 295: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 295 -

# v180: Trustworthy politicians

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Do you find most of our politicians to be trustworthy, that they are trustworthy on the whole, or that few Norwegianpoliticians are trustworthy?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Most are trustworthy 296 16.6%

2 Trustworthy on the whole 1189 66.7%

3 Few trustworthy politicians 277 15.5%

8 Won't answer 8 0.4%

9 Don't know 12 0.7%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v181: Reduce state control over private industry

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question I will once more read you some statements about political questions. Could you for each statement say if you strongly agree,agree somewhat, disagree somewhat or if you strongly disagree?

... A. We should reduce state control over private industry.

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Use card 1.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Strongly agree 228 12.8%

2 Agree somewhat 487 27.3%

3 Yes and no 146 8.2%

4 Disagree somewhat 640 35.9%

5 Strongly disagree 230 12.9%

8 Won't answer 12 0.7%

9 Don't know 39 2.2%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v182: Secure economic growth - develop our industry

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question I will once more read you some statements about political questions. Could you for each statement say if you strongly agree,agree somewhat, disagree somewhat or if you strongly disagree?

... B. To secure economic growth we need to develop our industry even if it conflicts with environmental considerations.

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Use card 1.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Strongly agree 297 16.7%

2 Agree somewhat 692 38.8%

3 Yes and no 164 9.2%

4 Disagree somewhat 481 27.0%

5 Strongly disagree 106 5.9%

8 Won't answer 14 0.8%

9 Don't know 28 1.6%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

Page 296: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 296 -

# v183: Public activities could have been done better, if left to private.

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question I will once more read you some statements about political questions. Could you for each statement say if you strongly agree,agree somewhat, disagree somewhat or if you strongly disagree?

... C. Many public activities could have been done better and cheaper, if they were handed over to private operators.

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Use card 1.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Strongly agree 366 20.5%

2 Agree somewhat 617 34.6%

3 Yes and no 144 8.1%

4 Disagree somewhat 424 23.8%

5 Strongly disagree 190 10.7%

8 Won't answer 11 0.6%

9 Don't know 30 1.7%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v184: High incomes should be put under harder taxation

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question I will once more read you some statements about political questions. Could you for each statement say if you strongly agree,agree somewhat, disagree somewhat or if you strongly disagree?

... D. High incomes should be put under harder taxation than they are today.

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Use card 1.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Strongly agree 338 19.0%

2 Agree somewhat 539 30.2%

3 Yes and no 109 6.1%

4 Disagree somewhat 507 28.5%

5 Strongly disagree 255 14.3%

8 Won't answer 11 0.6%

9 Don't know 23 1.3%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v185: International orientation is important

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question I will once more read you some statements about political questions. Could you for each statement say if you strongly agree,agree somewhat, disagree somewhat or if you strongly disagree?

... E. We should go for a society that has a more international orientation, with less emphasis on boundaries between peoplesand countries.

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Use card 1.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Strongly agree 267 15.0%

2 Agree somewhat 710 39.8%

Page 297: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 297 -

# v185: International orientation is important

Value Label Cases Percentage

3 Yes and no 160 9.0%

4 Disagree somewhat 453 25.4%

5 Strongly disagree 144 8.1%

8 Won't answer 11 0.6%

9 Don't know 37 2.1%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v186: Christian values are more prominent

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question I will once more read you some statements about political questions. Could you for each statement say if you strongly agree,agree somewhat, disagree somewhat or if you strongly disagree?

... F. We should promote a society where Christian values are more prominent.

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Use card 1.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Strongly agree 223 12.5%

2 Agree somewhat 418 23.5%

3 Yes and no 121 6.8%

4 Disagree somewhat 573 32.2%

5 Strongly disagree 415 23.3%

8 Won't answer 12 0.7%

9 Don't know 20 1.1%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v187: Globalisation is absolutely necessary to secure economic growth

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question I will once more read you some statements about political questions. Could you for each statement say if you strongly agree,agree somewhat, disagree somewhat or if you strongly disagree?

... G. Globalisation is absolutely necessary to secure economic growth.

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Use card 1.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Strongly agree 409 23.0%

2 Agree somewhat 875 49.1%

3 Yes and no 154 8.6%

4 Disagree somewhat 227 12.7%

5 Strongly disagree 44 2.5%

8 Won't answer 12 0.7%

9 Don't know 61 3.4%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v188: New technology will solve the problem of climate change

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Page 298: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 298 -

# v188: New technology will solve the problem of climate change

Literal question I will once more read you some statements about political questions. Could you for each statement say if you strongly agree,agree somewhat, disagree somewhat or if you strongly disagree?

... H. New technology will solve the problem of climate change without us reducing our standard of living.

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Use card 1.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Strongly agree 198 11.1%

2 Agree somewhat 640 35.9%

3 Yes and no 151 8.5%

4 Disagree somewhat 527 29.6%

5 Strongly disagree 198 11.1%

8 Won't answer 11 0.6%

9 Don't know 57 3.2%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v189: Significance of media coverage

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question If we look back on the coverage of the election campaign on television, radio and in the newspapers as a whole, what impacthas it had on your voting decision/your decision not to vote. Would you say..

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 A decisive impact 56 3.1%

2 Quite a lot of impact 258 14.5%

3 Some impact 815 45.7%

4 No impact 622 34.9%

8 Won't answer 10 0.6%

9 Don't know 21 1.2%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v190: Household economy better or worse

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-3] [Missing=*/8/9]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1764 /-] [Invalid=18 /-]

Literal question We are interested in people's current economic status. Would you say that you and your household's economy is better orworse than it was a year ago?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Better 590 33.4%

2 Same 976 55.3%

3 Worse 198 11.2%

8 Won't answer 9

9 Don't know 9Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v191: Household economy: much better or a bit better

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=590 /-] [Invalid=1192 /-]

Literal question Is it much better or a bit better?

Page 299: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 299 -

# v191: Household economy: much better or a bit better

Interviewer's instructions If answered 'better' in spm64.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Much better 122 20.7%

2 A bit better 468 79.3%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 0Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v192: Household economy: much worse or a bit worse

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=198 /-] [Invalid=1584 /-]

Literal question Is it much worse or a bit worse?

Interviewer's instructions If answered 'worse' in spm64.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Much worse 42 21.2%

2 A bit worse 156 78.8%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 0Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v193: Future personal economic situation

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-3] [Missing=*/8/9]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1759 /-] [Invalid=23 /-]

Literal question Let's think ahead towards the years to come. Do you think your economic situation would be like today, better than today ordo you think it would be worse than today?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Better 485 27.6%

2 About the same 1137 64.6%

3 Worse 137 7.8%

8 Won't answer 9

9 Don't know 14Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v194: The economic situation in Norway today

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-5] [Missing=*/8/9]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1760 /-] [Invalid=22 /-]

Literal question What do you think about the economic situation in Norway today? Would you say the economy is very good, good, neithergood nor bad, bad or very bad?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Very good 608 34.5%

2 Good 939 53.4%

3 Neither good nor bad 192 10.9%

4 Bad 19 1.1%

5 Very bad 2 0.1%

8 Won't answer 9

Page 300: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 300 -

# v194: The economic situation in Norway today

Value Label Cases Percentage

9 Don't know 13Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v195: Economic situation last year

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-3] [Missing=*/8/9]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1744 /-] [Invalid=38 /-]

Literal question Would you say that the economic situation in the country has improved the last 12 months, is it almost unchanged or is itworse today?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Improved 323 18.5%

2 Unchanged 1059 60.7%

3 Worse 362 20.8%

8 Won't answer 9

9 Don't know 29Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v196: Ec. situation: much better or a bit better

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=323 /-] [Invalid=1459 /-]

Literal question Would you say much better or a bit better?

Interviewer's instructions If answered 'improved' in spm69.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Much better 48 14.9%

2 A bit better 275 85.1%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 0Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v197: Ec. situation: much worse or a bit worse

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=362 /-] [Invalid=1420 /-]

Literal question Would you say much worse or a bit worse?

Interviewer's instructions If answered 'worse' in spm69.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Much worse 30 8.3%

2 A bit worse 332 91.7%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 0Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v198: Social security schemes

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Let's look at the scope of all our benefits. Some believe that we have gradually received more than enough of benefits, andthat we should seek to limit them in the future, while others argue that we should maintain our social security schemes, and if

Page 301: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 301 -

# v198: Social security schemes

necessary develop them further. What is your opinion? Do you think that in the future there should be less benefits, that theyshould be maintained as they are now, or that they should be increased?

Interviewer's instructions If there is doubt about where answer should be crossed off, check the 'other answers'.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Should be less 287 16.1%

2 Maintained as they are now 1173 65.8%

3 Should be increased 250 14.0%

4 Other answers 32 1.8%

8 Won't answer 9 0.5%

9 Don't know 31 1.7%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v199: Spending oil income

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Let us imagine two persons A and B discussing a question of current interest. We have listed two statements the two personsput forward.

A says: To avoid an increase in interest, and higher prices, we should not use more of the oil income than we do at present.

B says: To solve current problems in society we may use considerably more of the oil income than we do at present.

Which one of these persons would you agree more with?

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Use card 16.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Agree more with A 936 52.5%

2 Agree with both A and B/Can't decide 204 11.4%

3 Agree more with B 595 33.4%

8 Won't answer 11 0.6%

9 Don't know 36 2.0%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v200: Choice of freedom for citizens

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question There is also a discussion about greater choice of freedom for citizens, for example between public or private providers ofservice tasks, or between different public institutions.

A says: There should be introduced, to a greater extent than now, more freedom of choice in the public sector.

B says: The chice of freedom for citizens today is adequate.

Which one of these persons would you agree more with?

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Use card 17.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Agree more with A 846 47.5%

2 Agree with both A and B/Can't decide 161 9.0%

3 Agree more with B 722 40.5%

8 Won't answer 11 0.6%

Page 302: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 302 -

# v200: Choice of freedom for citizens

Value Label Cases Percentage

9 Don't know 42 2.4%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

Page 303: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 303 -

# v201: Society's social reforms

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Now a question about society's social spending.

A says: We have gone too far with social reforms in this country. People should to a greater degree than now manage withoutsocial benefits and contributions from the community.

B says: The social reforms that have been implemented should be maintained for at least the same extent as now.

Which one of these persons would you agree more with?

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Use card 8.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Agree more with A 328 18.4%

2 Agree with both A and B/Can't decide 217 12.2%

3 Agree more with B 1196 67.1%

8 Won't answer 11 0.6%

9 Don't know 30 1.7%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v202: Misuse of our welfare benefits

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Do you think that our welfare benefits are misused greatly, in some degree or a small degree?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Misused to a large extent 340 19.1%

2 Misused in some degree 1169 65.6%

3 Misused in a small degree 231 13.0%

8 Won't answer 10 0.6%

9 Don't know 32 1.8%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v203: Can vote, but can't do anything else to influence politics

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Now let's take a look at some statements. We will continue to use the answer alternatives: strongly agree, agree somewhat,disagree somewhat and strongly disagree.

... A. People like me can vote, but we can't do anything else to influence politics.

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Use card 1.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Strongly agree 222 12.5%

2 Agree somewhat 494 27.7%

3 Yes and no 78 4.4%

4 Disagree somewhat 587 32.9%

5 Strongly disagree 366 20.5%

8 Won't answer 13 0.7%

9 Don't know 22 1.2%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

Page 304: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 304 -

# v204: Climate change is mainly manmade.

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-5] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Now let's take a look at some statements. We will continue to use the answer alternatives: strongly agree, agree somewhat,disagree somewhat and strongly disagree.

... B. Climate change is mainly manmade.

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Use card 1.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Strongly agree 498 27.9%

2 Agree somewhat 788 44.2%

3 Yes and no 138 7.7%

4 Disagree somewhat 229 12.9%

5 Strongly disagree 86 4.8%

8 Won't answer 13 0.7%

9 Don't know 30 1.7%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v205: Equal adoption rights for homosexuals and heterosexuals

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Now let's take a look at some statements. We will continue to use the answer alternatives: strongly agree, agree somewhat,disagree somewhat and strongly disagree.

... C. There should be equal adoption rights for homosexuals and heterosexuals.

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Use card 1.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Strongly agree 373 20.9%

2 Agree somewhat 415 23.3%

3 Yes and no 87 4.9%

4 Disagree somewhat 321 18.0%

5 Strongly disagree 542 30.4%

8 Won't answer 14 0.8%

9 Don't know 30 1.7%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v206: Not possible to maintain the welfare state

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Now let's take a look at some statements. We will continue to use the answer alternatives: strongly agree, agree somewhat,disagree somewhat and strongly disagree.

... D. In the longer term it is not possible to maintain the welfare state at the present level.

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Use card 1.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Strongly agree 136 7.6%

2 Agree somewhat 592 33.2%

3 Yes and no 134 7.5%

Page 305: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 305 -

# v206: Not possible to maintain the welfare state

Value Label Cases Percentage

4 Disagree somewhat 620 34.8%

5 Strongly disagree 242 13.6%

8 Won't answer 13 0.7%

9 Don't know 45 2.5%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v207: Not Norwgian citizens- expelled if commit criminal act

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Now let's take a look at some statements. We will continue to use the answer alternatives: strongly agree, agree somewhat,disagree somewhat and strongly disagree.

... E. If immigrants without Norwegian citizenship commit a criminal act, they should be sent out.

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Use card 1.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Strongly agree 1096 61.5%

2 Agree somewhat 444 24.9%

3 Yes and no 51 2.9%

4 Disagree somewhat 115 6.5%

5 Strongly disagree 46 2.6%

8 Won't answer 14 0.8%

9 Don't know 16 0.9%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v208: Should build more waterways.

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Now let's take a look at some statements. We will continue to use the answer alternatives: strongly agree, agree somewhat,disagree somewhat and strongly disagree.

... F. We should build more waterways.

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Use card 1.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Strongly agree 330 18.5%

2 Agree somewhat 514 28.8%

3 Yes and no 120 6.7%

4 Disagree somewhat 456 25.6%

5 Strongly disagree 295 16.6%

8 Won't answer 13 0.7%

9 Don't know 54 3.0%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v209: More state institutions should be moved

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Now let's take a look at some statements. We will continue to use the answer alternatives: strongly agree, agree somewhat,disagree somewhat and strongly disagree.

Page 306: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 306 -

# v209: More state institutions should be moved

... G. More state institutions should be moved to district areas.

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Use card 1.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Strongly agree 469 26.3%

2 Agree somewhat 730 41.0%

3 Yes and no 112 6.3%

4 Disagree somewhat 300 16.8%

5 Strongly disagree 120 6.7%

8 Won't answer 13 0.7%

9 Don't know 38 2.1%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v210: Should allow euthanasia.

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Now let's take a look at some statements. We will continue to use the answer alternatives: strongly agree, agree somewhat,disagree somewhat and strongly disagree.

... H. We should allow euthanasia.

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Use card 1.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Strongly agree 222 12.5%

2 Agree somewhat 459 25.8%

3 Yes and no 170 9.5%

4 Disagree somewhat 389 21.8%

5 Strongly disagree 460 25.8%

8 Won't answer 18 1.0%

9 Don't know 64 3.6%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v211: Wealth tax should be abolished.

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Now let's take a look at some statements. We will continue to use the answer alternatives: strongly agree, agree somewhat,disagree somewhat and strongly disagree.

... I. Wealth tax should be abolished.

Interviewer's instructions Personal interview: Use card 1.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Strongly agree 582 32.7%

2 Agree somewhat 404 22.7%

3 Yes and no 84 4.7%

4 Disagree somewhat 421 23.6%

5 Strongly disagree 242 13.6%

8 Won't answer 12 0.7%

9 Don't know 37 2.1%

Page 307: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 307 -

# v211: Wealth tax should be abolished.

Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v212: Vote in the election

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Did you vote in the election this fall?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 1578 88.6%

2 No 184 10.3%

8 Won't answer 10 0.6%

9 Don't know 10 0.6%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v213: If had voted: Red/Red Electoral Alliance

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=194 /-] [Invalid=1588 /-]

Literal question Let us imagine that you had voted, which party or parties would you vote for?

... A. Red/Red Electoral Alliance

Interviewer's instructions Ask spm79 to those who have not voted in spm78. Then go to spm88 for this R.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 1 0.5%

2 No 171 88.1%

8 Won't answer 1 0.5%

9 Don't know 21 10.8%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v214: If had voted: SV

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=194 /-] [Invalid=1588 /-]

Literal question Let us imagine that you had voted, which party or parties would you vote for?

... B. Social Left Party (SV)

Interviewer's instructions Ask spm79 to those who have not voted in spm78. Then go to spm88 for this R.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 10 5.2%

2 No 162 83.5%

8 Won't answer 1 0.5%

9 Don't know 21 10.8%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v215: If had voted: DNA

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=194 /-] [Invalid=1588 /-]

Literal question Let us imagine that you had voted, which party or parties would you vote for?

... C. Labour Party (DNA)

Interviewer's instructions Ask spm79 to those who have not voted in spm78. Then go to spm88 for this R.

Page 308: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 308 -

# v215: If had voted: DNA

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 68 35.1%

2 No 104 53.6%

8 Won't answer 1 0.5%

9 Don't know 21 10.8%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v216: If had voted: V

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=194 /-] [Invalid=1588 /-]

Literal question Let us imagine that you had voted, which party or parties would you vote for?

... D. Liberal Party (V)

Interviewer's instructions Ask spm79 to those who have not voted in spm78. Then go to spm88 for this R.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 11 5.7%

2 No 161 83.0%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 22 11.3%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v217: If had voted: Krf

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=194 /-] [Invalid=1588 /-]

Literal question Let us imagine that you had voted, which party or parties would you vote for?

... E. Christian People's Party (KrF)

Interviewer's instructions Ask spm79 to those who have not voted in spm78. Then go to spm88 for this R.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 5 2.6%

2 No 167 86.1%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 22 11.3%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v218: If had voted: SP

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=194 /-] [Invalid=1588 /-]

Literal question Let us imagine that you had voted, which party or parties would you vote for?

... F. Center Party (Sp)

Interviewer's instructions Ask spm79 to those who have not voted in spm78. Then go to spm88 for this R.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 9 4.6%

2 No 163 84.0%

8 Won't answer 0

Page 309: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 309 -

# v218: If had voted: SP

Value Label Cases Percentage

9 Don't know 22 11.3%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v219: If had voted: H

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=194 /-] [Invalid=1588 /-]

Literal question Let us imagine that you had voted, which party or parties would you vote for?

... G. Conservative Party (H)

Interviewer's instructions Ask spm79 to those who have not voted in spm78. Then go to spm88 for this R.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 17 8.8%

2 No 155 79.9%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 22 11.3%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v220: If had voted: Frp

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=194 /-] [Invalid=1588 /-]

Literal question Let us imagine that you had voted, which party or parties would you vote for?

... H. Progress Party (FrP)

Interviewer's instructions Ask spm79 to those who have not voted in spm78. Then go to spm88 for this R.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 44 22.7%

2 No 128 66.0%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 22 11.3%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v221: If had voted: Andre partier

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=194 /-] [Invalid=1588 /-]

Literal question Let us imagine that you had voted, which party or parties would you vote for?

... I. Other parties/lists

Interviewer's instructions Ask spm79 to those who have not voted in spm78. Then go to spm88 for this R.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 0

2 No 172 88.7%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 22 11.3%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v222: If had voted: Stemme blankt

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Page 310: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 310 -

# v222: If had voted: Stemme blankt

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=194 /-] [Invalid=1588 /-]

Literal question Let us imagine that you had voted, which party or parties would you vote for?

... J. Blank vote

Interviewer's instructions Ask spm79 to those who have not voted in spm78. Then go to spm88 for this R.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 22 11.3%

2 No 150 77.3%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 22 11.3%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v223: Specify other parties/lists

Information [Type= discrete] [Format=character] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=0 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question La oss tenke oss at du likevel hadde stemt, hvilket parti eller partier ville du da ha stemt på?

... I. Other parties/lists

... A. Specify

Interviewer's instructions Ask spm79 to those who have not voted in spm78. Then go to spm88 for this R.

# v224: Which party or list did you vote for

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-99] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1578 /-] [Invalid=204 /-]

Literal question Which party or list did you vote for?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Red/Red Electoral Alliance 21 1.3%

2 Social Left Party (SV) 130 8.2%

3 Labour Party (DNA) 542 34.3%

4 Liberal Party (V) 71 4.5%

5 Christian People's Party (KrF) 70 4.4%

6 Center Party (Sp) 101 6.4%

7 Conservative Party (H) 309 19.6%

8 Progress Party (FrP) 297 18.8%

9 Other parties/lists, specify 7 0.4%

20 Blank vote (20) 2 0.1%

98 Won't answer 21 1.3%

99 Don't know 7 0.4%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v225: Specify other parties/lists

Information [Type= discrete] [Format=character] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=7 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Specify other parties/lists

Value Label Cases Percentage

Page 311: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 311 -

# v225: Specify other parties/lists

Value Label Cases Percentage

Der grønne 1 14.3%

Miljøpartiet DeGrønne

1 14.3%

Miljøpartiet Degrønne

1 14.3%

Pensjonistpartiet 1 14.3%

kystpartiet 1 14.3%

miljøpartiet degrønne

1 14.3%

nyfremtid,kristentsamlingspa

1 14.3%

Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v226: Other parties also considered voting for

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1557 /-] [Invalid=225 /-]

Literal question Was there any other parties you also considered voting for?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 958 61.5%

2 No 598 38.4%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 1 0.1%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v227: Considered voting for: Red/Red Electoral Alliance

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=958 /-] [Invalid=824 /-]

Literal question Which party or parties is this?

... A. Red/Red Electoral Alliance

Interviewer's instructions Asked if the answered 'yes' in spm81.It is allowed for respondents to mention the several parties.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 31 3.2%

2 No 922 96.2%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 5 0.5%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v228: Considered voting for: SV

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=958 /-] [Invalid=824 /-]

Literal question Which party or parties is this?

... B. Social Left Party (SV)

Interviewer's instructions Asked if the answered 'yes' in spm81.It is allowed for respondents to mention the several parties.

Page 312: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 312 -

# v228: Considered voting for: SV

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 147 15.3%

2 No 806 84.1%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 5 0.5%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v229: Considered voting for: DNA

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=958 /-] [Invalid=824 /-]

Literal question Which party or parties is this?

... C. Labour Party (DNA)

Interviewer's instructions Asked if the answered 'yes' in spm81.It is allowed for respondents to mention the several parties.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 268 28.0%

2 No 685 71.5%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 5 0.5%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v230: Considered voting for: V

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-8] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=958 /-] [Invalid=824 /-]

Literal question Which party or parties is this?

... D. Liberal Party (V)

Interviewer's instructions Asked if the answered 'yes' in spm81.It is allowed for respondents to mention the several parties.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 139 14.5%

2 No 814 85.0%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 5 0.5%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v231: Considered voting for: Krf

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=958 /-] [Invalid=824 /-]

Literal question Which party or parties is this?

... E. Christian People's Party (KrF)

Interviewer's instructions Asked if the answered 'yes' in spm81.It is allowed for respondents to mention the several parties.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 63 6.6%

Page 313: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 313 -

# v231: Considered voting for: Krf

Value Label Cases Percentage

2 No 890 92.9%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 5 0.5%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v232: Considered voting for: SP

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=958 /-] [Invalid=824 /-]

Literal question Which party or parties is this?

... F. Center Party (Sp)

Interviewer's instructions Asked if the answered 'yes' in spm81.It is allowed for respondents to mention the several parties.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 82 8.6%

2 No 871 90.9%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 5 0.5%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v233: Considered voting for: H

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=958 /-] [Invalid=824 /-]

Literal question Which party or parties is this?

... G. Conservative Party (H)

Interviewer's instructions Asked if the answered 'yes' in spm81.It is allowed for respondents to mention the several parties.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 276 28.8%

2 No 677 70.7%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 5 0.5%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v234: Considered voting for: Frp

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=958 /-] [Invalid=824 /-]

Literal question Which party or parties is this?

... H. Progress Party (FrP)

Interviewer's instructions Asked if the answered 'yes' in spm81.It is allowed for respondents to mention the several parties.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 140 14.6%

2 No 813 84.9%

8 Won't answer 0

Page 314: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 314 -

# v234: Considered voting for: Frp

Value Label Cases Percentage

9 Don't know 5 0.5%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v235: Considered voting for: Other parties/lists

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=958 /-] [Invalid=824 /-]

Literal question Which party or parties is this?

... I. Other parties/lists

Interviewer's instructions Asked if the answered 'yes' in spm81.It is allowed for respondents to mention the several parties.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 9 0.9%

2 No 944 98.5%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 5 0.5%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v236: Specify other parties - considered voting

Information [Type= discrete] [Format=character] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=9 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Which party or parties is this?

... I. Other parties/lists

... A. Specify

Interviewer's instructions Asked if the answered 'yes' in spm81.It is allowed for respondents to mention the several parties.

Value Label Cases Percentage

De Grønne 1 11.1%

NorgesPatriotene

1 11.1%

de grønne 2 22.2%

demokratene ogkystpartiet

1 11.1%

det grønne parti/miljøparti

1 11.1%

dlf 1 11.1%

kystpartiet 1 11.1%

pensjonistpartiet 1 11.1%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v237: Parties never would have voted for

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1557 /-] [Invalid=225 /-]

Literal question Are there any parties you would never have voted for?

Value Label Cases Percentage

Page 315: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 315 -

# v237: Parties never would have voted for

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 1459 93.7%

2 No 95 6.1%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 3 0.2%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v238: Parties never would have voted for: Red/Red Electoral Alliance

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1459 /-] [Invalid=323 /-]

Literal question Which party or parties is this?

... A. Red/Red Electoral Alliance

Interviewer's instructions Asked if answered 'yes' in spm83.Several crosses are possible.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 763 52.3%

2 No 691 47.4%

8 Won't answer 1 0.1%

9 Don't know 4 0.3%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v239: Parties never would have voted for: SV

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1459 /-] [Invalid=323 /-]

Literal question Which party or parties is this?

... B. Social Left Party (SV)

Interviewer's instructions Asked if answered 'yes' in spm83.Several crosses are possible.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 453 31.0%

2 No 1001 68.6%

8 Won't answer 1 0.1%

9 Don't know 4 0.3%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v240: Parties never would have voted for: DNA

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1459 /-] [Invalid=323 /-]

Literal question Which party or parties is this?

... C. Labour Party (DNA)

Interviewer's instructions Asked if answered 'yes' in spm83.Several crosses are possible.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 122 8.4%

Page 316: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 316 -

# v240: Parties never would have voted for: DNA

Value Label Cases Percentage

2 No 1332 91.3%

8 Won't answer 1 0.1%

9 Don't know 4 0.3%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v241: Parties never would have voted for: V

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1459 /-] [Invalid=323 /-]

Literal question Which party or parties is this?

... D. Liberal Party (V)

Interviewer's instructions Asked if answered 'yes' in spm83.Several crosses are possible.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 217 14.9%

2 No 1237 84.8%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 5 0.3%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v242: Parties never would have voted for: Krf

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1459 /-] [Invalid=323 /-]

Literal question Which party or parties is this?

... E. Christian People's Party (KrF)

Interviewer's instructions Asked if answered 'yes' in spm83.Several crosses are possible.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 438 30.0%

2 No 1016 69.6%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 5 0.3%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v243: Parties never would have voted for: SP

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1459 /-] [Invalid=323 /-]

Literal question Which party or parties is this?

... F. Center Party (Sp)

Interviewer's instructions Asked if answered 'yes' in spm83.Several crosses are possible.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 196 13.4%

2 No 1258 86.2%

8 Won't answer 0

Page 317: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 317 -

# v243: Parties never would have voted for: SP

Value Label Cases Percentage

9 Don't know 5 0.3%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v244: Parties never would have voted for: H

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1459 /-] [Invalid=323 /-]

Literal question Which party or parties is this?

... G. Conservative Party (H)

Interviewer's instructions Asked if answered 'yes' in spm83.Several crosses are possible.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 144 9.9%

2 No 1310 89.8%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 5 0.3%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v245: Parties never would have voted for: Frp

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1459 /-] [Invalid=323 /-]

Literal question Which party or parties is this?

... H. Progress Party (FrP)

Interviewer's instructions Asked if answered 'yes' in spm83.Several crosses are possible.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 797 54.6%

2 No 657 45.0%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 5 0.3%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v246: Parties never would have voted for: Andre partier

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1459 /-] [Invalid=323 /-]

Literal question Which party or parties is this?

... I. Other parties/lists

Interviewer's instructions Asked if answered 'yes' in spm83.Several crosses are possible.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 53 3.6%

2 No 1401 96.0%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 5 0.3%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

Page 318: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 318 -

# v247: Specify other parties - not considered voting

Information [Type= discrete] [Format=numeric] [Range= 0-0] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1 /-] [Invalid=1781 /-]

Literal question Hvilket parti eller hvilke partier var dette?

... I. Other parties/lists

... A. Specify

Interviewer's instructions Asked if answered 'yes' in spm83.Several crosses are possible.

Value Label Cases Percentage

0 1 100.0%

Sysmiss 1781Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v248: Difficulties with vote decision

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1557 /-] [Invalid=225 /-]

Literal question Some people say that it was very easy to make up their minds in this election, while others found it very difficult. How didyou find it, was it …

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Very easy 584 37.5%

2 Somewhat easy 587 37.7%

3 Somewhat difficult 275 17.7%

4 Very difficult? 110 7.1%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 1 0.1%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v249: Decided - election campaign

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1557 /-] [Invalid=225 /-]

Literal question When you decided upon the party you voted for - was it a long time before the election campaign started, was it at somepoint during the election campaign or was it right before polling day?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 A long time before the election campaign 803 51.6%

2 During the election campaign 336 21.6%

3 Right before polling day 253 16.2%

4 On the polling day 163 10.5%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 2 0.1%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v250: Vote in advance

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1392 /-] [Invalid=390 /-]

Literal question Did you make use of the arrangement that allows you to cast your vote in advance, or did you cast your vote at a regularpolling station?

Page 319: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 319 -

# v250: Vote in advance

Interviewer's instructions If answered 'a long time before the election campaign' or 'during the election campaign' in spm86.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Vote in advance 332 23.9%

2 Voted at an ordinary voting station 1060 76.1%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 0Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

Page 320: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 320 -

# v251: Voted previous Storting election

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-99] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question If we turn to the previous Storting election. Who did you vote for in the Storting election in 2005?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Red/Red Electoral Alliance (RV) 14 0.8%

2 Social Left Party (SV) 170 9.5%

3 Labour Party (DNA) 536 30.1%

4 Liberal Party (V) 90 5.1%

5 Christian people's Party (KRF) 82 4.6%

6 Center Party (SP) 98 5.5%

7 Conservative Party (H) 264 14.8%

8 Progress Party (FRP) 227 12.7%

9 Other parties/lists, specify 4 0.2%

40 Did not have the right to vote 113 6.3%

50 Did not have the opportunity to vote, e.g. away from home 24 1.3%

60 Did not vote for other reasons 90 5.1%

70 Blank vote 10 0.6%

98 Won't answer 22 1.2%

99 Don't know 38 2.1%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v252: Specify other party voted for the previous Storting election

Information [Type= discrete] [Format=character] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=4 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Specify other party voted for the previous Storting election

Value Label Cases Percentage

Kystpartiet 1 25.0%

de konservative 1 25.0%

kystpartiet 2 50.0%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v253: Current marital status

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Pre-question Finally we have some questions that will provide background information for the survey.

Literal question What is your current marital status? Are you..

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Married/registered partner 934 52.4%

2 Cohabitant 275 15.4%

3 Unmarried 357 20.0%

4 Widow/widower 64 3.6%

5 Separated/divorced 134 7.5%

8 Won't answer 8 0.4%

9 Don't know 10 0.6%

Page 321: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 321 -

# v253: Current marital status

Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v254: Children below the age of 16 living with you

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 0-99] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Have you got any children below the age of 16 living with you, if so, how many?

Interviewer's instructions If the respondent does not have children living at home under the age of 16, enter 00 in the box below.

# v255: R. in currently paid employment

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Are you currently in paid employment?

Post-question Work of more than one hour per week should be included.

Interviewer's instructions As paid work, we also count work as a family member without fixed wages on farms, in business and family business.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 1271 71.3%

2 No 491 27.6%

8 Won't answer 9 0.5%

9 Don't know 11 0.6%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v256: R's normal weekly working hours

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 2-999] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1271 /-] [Invalid=511 /-]

Literal question How many hours a week do you usually work in your job?

Post-question You should count overtime payment and extra hours at home in connection to this work.

Interviewer's instructions If R has highly variable working hours per week, list up an estimate of the average working hours per week. week. If Ranswers 'don't know', ask wether he / she can say that he/she works at least 10 hours a week.

# v257: Do you consider yourself as...?

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Do you consider yourself as...?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Working 1177 66.0%

2 Student 153 8.6%

3 Retired, pensioner or receiving disability benefit 360 20.2%

4 Domestic worker 22 1.2%

5 Unemployed 33 1.9%

6 Conscript, draftee 1 0.1%

7 Other 16 0.9%

8 Won't answer 9 0.5%

9 Don't know 11 0.6%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

Page 322: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 322 -

# v258: What is your primary source of income?

Information [Type= discrete] [Format=numeric] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=0 /-] [Invalid=1782 /-]

Literal question What is your primary source of income?

Interviewer's instructions If answered 'other' in bak5a.

Value Label Cases Percentage

Sysmiss 1782Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v259: R. supervise the work of others

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1177 /-] [Invalid=605 /-]

Literal question Do you have any tasks which involved supervising the work of others?

Interviewer's instructions If answered 'working' in bak5a.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 456 38.7%

2 No 721 61.3%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 0Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v260: R's primary occupation/profession - code

Information [Type= discrete] [Format=numeric] [Range= 0-9999] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1177 /-] [Invalid=605 /-]

Literal question What is your primary occupation/profession?

Interviewer's instructions If answered 'working' in bak5a.

Value Label Cases Percentage

0 Uoppgitt eller yrker som ikke kan identifiseres 14 1.2%

111 Menige 0

112 Befal I 2 0.2%

113 Befal II 2 0.2%

1110 Politikere 1 0.1%

1120 Toppledere i offentlig administrasjon 3 0.3%

1141 Ledere i partipolitiske organisasjoner 0

1142 Ledere i arb.giver-arb.takerorganisasjoner og økonomiske int 1 0.1%

1143 Ledere i humanitære organisasjoner og andre interesseorganis 2 0.2%

1210 Administrerende direktører 20 1.7%

1220 Produksjonsdirektører innen ikke-spesifisert næringsområde 0

1221 Produksjonsdirektører innen jordbruk, skogbruk og fiske 1 0.1%

1222 Produksjonsdirektører innen olje- og gassutvinning, bergverk 8 0.7%

1223 Produksjonsdirektører innen bygge- og anleggsvirksomhet 10 0.8%

1224 Produksjonsdirektører innen varehandel, hotell- og restauran 1 0.1%

1225 Produksjonsdirektører innen transport og kommunikasjon 2 0.2%

1226 Produksjonsdirektører innen finansiell tjenesteyting, eiendo 7 0.6%

Page 323: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 323 -

# v260: R's primary occupation/profession - code

Value Label Cases Percentage

1227 Produksjonsdirektører innen offentlig administrasjon 18 1.5%

1228 Produksjonsdirektører innen undervisning, helse- og sosialtj 9 0.8%

1229 Produksjonsdirektører innen andre sosiale og personlige tjen 1 0.1%

1231 Finans-, økonomi- og administrasjonsdirektører 11 0.9%

1232 Personaldirektører 8 0.7%

1233 Salgsdirektører 7 0.6%

1234 Markeds- og informasjonsdirektører 3 0.3%

1235 Innkjøps- og distribusjonsdirektører 8 0.7%

1236 IT-direktører 2 0.2%

1237 Forskningsdirektører 1 0.1%

1239 Andre spesialdirektører 5 0.4%

1310 Ledere innen ikke-spesifisert næringsområde 12 1.0%

1311 Ledere innen jordbruk, skogbruk og fiske 0

1312 Ledere innen bergverksdrift, industri, kraft- og vannforsyni 4 0.3%

1313 Ledere innen bygge- og anleggsvirksomhet 0

1314 Ledere innen varehandel mv. 14 1.2%

1315 Ledere innen hotell- og restaurantvirksomhet 1 0.1%

1316 Ledere innen transport og kommunikasjon 1 0.1%

1317 Ledere innen finansiell tjenesteyting, eiendomsdrift osv. 0

1318 Ledere innen renovasjon, personlig tjenesteyting og arbeid f 1 0.1%

1319 Andre ledere 1 0.1%

1320 4 0.3%

2111 Fysikere og astronomer 0

2112 Meteorologer 0

2113 Kjemikere 2 0.2%

2114 Geologer og geofysikere 1 0.1%

2121 Matematikere og tilsvarende yrker 0

2122 Statistikere 2 0.2%

2130 Systemutviklere og programmerere 21 1.8%

2141 Sivilarkitekter, by og trafikkplanleggere 6 0.5%

2142 Sivilingeniører (bygg og anlegg) 7 0.6%

2143 Sivilingeniører (elkraftteknikk) 1 0.1%

2144 Sivilingeniører (elektronikk og telekommunikasjon) 5 0.4%

2145 Sivilingeniører (maskin- og marinteknikk) 5 0.4%

2146 Sivilingeniører (kjemi) 3 0.3%

2147 Sivilingeniører (geofag, petroleumsteknologi, metallurgi o.l 3 0.3%

2148 Landmålere, jordskiftekandidater o.l. 0

2149 Andre sivilingeniører og tilsvarende yrker 6 0.5%

2211 Biologer, botanikere, zoologer og tilsvarende yrker 0

2212 Sivilagronomer og tilsvarende yrker 0

2221 Leger 7 0.6%

2222 Tannleger 2 0.2%

2223 Veterinærer 1 0.1%

Page 324: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 324 -

# v260: R's primary occupation/profession - code

Value Label Cases Percentage

2224 Farmasøyter 0

2225 Ernæringsfysiologer 0

2230 Spesialsykepleiere og jordmødre 21 1.8%

2310 Universitets- og høyskolelektorer/-lærere 10 0.8%

2320 Lektorer og adjunkter i videregående skole 21 1.8%

2340 Spesiallærere/spesialpedagoger 1 0.1%

2351 Spesialister i utdanningsmetodikk 0

2352 Studieinspektører o.l. 1 0.1%

2359 Andre lærere med minst 4 års universitets- eller høyskoleutd 1 0.1%

2411 Økonomisk og samfunnsvitenskapelig planlegging og utredning 14 1.2%

2412 Juridisk planlegging og utredning 8 0.7%

2413 Teknisk og naturvitenskapelig planlegging og utredning 6 0.5%

2419 Andre yrker innen offentlig administrajon 20 1.7%

2511 Statsautoriserte revisorer 5 0.4%

2512 Personal- og organisasjonskonsulenter 10 0.8%

2519 Markedsanalytikere og andre forretningsyrker 1 0.1%

2521 Advokater 2 0.2%

2522 Domstolsjurister 0

2523 Jurister innen politi og påtalemyndighet 0

2531 Arkivarer og konservatorer 4 0.3%

2532 Universitetsbibliotekarer 0

2541 Sosial- og siviløkonomer 12 1.0%

2542 Sosiologer, sosialantropologer, samfunnsgeografer og statsvi 0

2543 Historikere, arkeologer og filosofer 1 0.1%

2544 Språkforskere, oversettere og tolker 2 0.2%

2545 Psykologer 4 0.3%

2551 Forfattere og andre skribenter 1 0.1%

2552 Skulptører, kunstmalere og andre billedkunstnere 4 0.3%

2553 Dirigenter, komponister, musikere og sangere 3 0.3%

2554 Koreografer og dansere 0

2555 Skuespillere og regissører 1 0.1%

2560 Geistlige yrker 1 0.1%

3111 Bygningsingeniører og -teknikere 20 1.7%

3112 Elkraftingeniører og -teknikere 4 0.3%

3113 Elektronikk- og telekommunikasjonsingeniører og -teknikere 8 0.7%

3114 Maskiningeniører og -teknikere 7 0.6%

3115 Kjemiingeniører og -teknikere 2 0.2%

3116 Ingeniører og teknikere innen petroleum, bergverk og metallu 8 0.7%

3119 Andre ingeniører og teknikere 6 0.5%

3120 Dataingeniører og -teknikere 5 0.4%

3131 Filmfotografer og innspillingsteknikere 1 0.1%

3132 Operatører av kringkastings- og telekommunikasjonsutstyr 1 0.1%

3139 Andre operatører av optisk og elektronisk utstyr 0

Page 325: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 325 -

# v260: R's primary occupation/profession - code

Value Label Cases Percentage

3141 Skipsmaskinister 6 0.5%

3142 Dekksoffiserer og loser 3 0.3%

3143 Flygere 2 0.2%

3144 Flygeledere o.l. 2 0.2%

3151 Branninspektører 1 0.1%

3152 Sikkerhetsinspektører 2 0.2%

3211 Bioingeniører og -teknikere 4 0.3%

3212 Agroteknikere 1 0.1%

3213 Skogingeniører, skogkonsulenter o.l. 0

3221 Radiografer og audiografer 1 0.1%

3222 Helse- og miljøinspektører 0

3223 Kostholdskonsulenter 0

3224 Optikere 0

3225 Tannpleiere 1 0.1%

3226 Fysioterapeuter, ergoterapeuter o.l. 8 0.7%

3227 Dyrepleiere 1 0.1%

3228 Reseptarer 1 0.1%

3229 Naturterapeuter 0

3231 Sykepleiere 34 2.9%

3232 Vernepleiere 13 1.1%

3310 Grunnskolelærere 41 3.5%

3320 Førskolelærere 15 1.3%

3341 Yrkesfaglærere og faglærere i videregående skole 3 0.3%

3349 Andre yrker innen undervisning og pedagogisk arbeid 0

3411 Finansmeglere 3 0.3%

3412 Forsikringskonsulenter 7 0.6%

3413 Eiendomsmeglere og -forvaltere 2 0.2%

3414 Reisekonsulenter 2 0.2%

3415 Tekniske og kommersielle salgsrepresentanter 13 1.1%

3416 Innkjøpere 3 0.3%

3417 Takstmenn, takstinspektører og auksjonarier 1 0.1%

3418 Kundebehandlere (banktjenester) 7 0.6%

3419 Markedsførings- og reklamekonsulenter 5 0.4%

3421 Handels- og skipsmeglere 1 0.1%

3422 Speditører og befraktere 4 0.3%

3423 Kunde-/ personalkonsulenter (vikarbyrå) 0

3429 Andre forretningsmeglere 1 0.1%

3431 Funksjonærer innen administrasjon 2 0.2%

3432 Revisorer (ikke statsautoriserte) og regnskapsførere 12 1.0%

3433 Husøkonomer 1 0.1%

3441 Tollfunksjonærer 0

3442 Lavere saksbehandlere ved ligningskontor 1 0.1%

3443 Lavere saksbehandlere ved trygdekontor 1 0.1%

Page 326: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 326 -

# v260: R's primary occupation/profession - code

Value Label Cases Percentage

3444 Lavere saksbehandlere ved arbeidskontor 1 0.1%

3449 Andre lavere saksbehandlere innen offentlig administrasjon 4 0.3%

3450 Polititjenestemenn 10 0.8%

3460 Sosionomer, barnevernspedagoger o.l. 9 0.8%

3471 Dekoratører, designere og reklametegnere 0

3472 Sangere og musikere i underholdningsbransjen 0

3473 Klovner, tryllekunstnere, akrobater o.l. 0

3474 Inspisienter mfl. 0

3475 Idrettsutøvere og -trenere 0

3480 Religiøse yrker 1 0.1%

3491 Informasjonsmedarbeidere og journalister 6 0.5%

3492 Programsekretærer og programmedarbeidere 2 0.2%

3493 Bibliotekarer 3 0.3%

4111 Stenografer, referenter o.l. 0

4112 Dataregistrerere (puncheoperatører) 0

4113 Sekretærer 16 1.4%

4114 Kontormedarbeidere 8 0.7%

4121 Økonomimedarbeidere og revisjonsassistenter 8 0.7%

4129 Andre tallbehandlere 0

4131 Lagermedarbeidere og materialforvaltere 5 0.4%

4132 Logistikere 3 0.3%

4133 Transportfunksjonærer 1 0.1%

4141 Bibliotek- og arkivmedarbeidere 0

4142 Postbud og -sorterere 3 0.3%

4211 Billettører og billettselgere 0

4212 Post- og bankkasserere 2 0.2%

4213 Bingoverter o.l. 0

4214 Pantelånere 0

4215 Inkassomedarbeidere 0

4221 Reisebyråmedarbeidere o.l. 0

4222 Resepsjonister og opplysningsmedarbeidere 6 0.5%

4223 Sentralbordoperatører 1 0.1%

5111 Verter/vertinner på fly, skip og tog 0

5112 Konduktører og billettører (om bord i transportmidler) 0

5113 Reiseledere og guider 1 0.1%

5121 Internatledere o.l. 0

5122 Kokker 9 0.8%

5123 Hovmestere, servitører og barkeepere 1 0.1%

5131 Barne- og ungdomsarbeidere o.l. 24 2.0%

5132 Omsorgsarbeidere og hjelpepleiere 44 3.7%

5133 Hjemmehjelpere 1 0.1%

5134 Tannlegesekretærer 3 0.3%

5135 Legesekretærer 10 0.8%

Page 327: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 327 -

# v260: R's primary occupation/profession - code

Value Label Cases Percentage

5136 Dagmammaer, praktikanter o.l. 2 0.2%

5137 Apotekteknikere 2 0.2%

5139 Annet pleie- og omsorgspersonale 8 0.7%

5141 Frisører, kosmetologer o.l. 11 0.9%

5142 Begravelsesbyrå- og krematoriearbeidere 0

5143 Slankeverter, solstudioverter o.l. 0

5149 Andre yrker innen personlig tjenesteyting 0

5161 Brannkonstabler o.l. 4 0.3%

5162 Fengselsbetjenter 5 0.4%

5163 Vaktmestere o.l. 5 0.4%

5164 Vektere o.l. 3 0.3%

5169 Annet sikkerhetspersonale 0

5210 Mannekenger og andre modeller 0

5221 Butikkmedarbeidere o.l. 38 3.2%

5222 Blomsterdekoratører 0

5223 Dør- og telefonselgere 1 0.1%

5224 Selgere (engros) 2 0.2%

5225 Intervjuere 0

6111 Korn-, grønnsaks-, frukt- og bærprodusenter 1 0.1%

6112 Gartneriarbeidere 1 0.1%

6121 Melke- og husdyrprodusenter 17 1.4%

6122 Egg- og fjærfeprodusenter 0

6129 Andre dyreoppdrettere og røktere 0

6130 Plante- og husdyrprodusenter (kombinasjonsbruk) 6 0.5%

6210 Skogsarbeidere o.l. 0

6310 Fiskeoppdrettere o.l. 1 0.1%

6411 Fiskere 4 0.3%

6412 Fangstfolk 0

7110 Steinfagarbeidere, steinhoggere o.l. 1 0.1%

7121 Murere mfl. 2 0.2%

7122 Betong- og grunnarbeidere (bygg) 0

7123 Jernbindere 1 0.1%

7124 Forskalingssnekkere 2 0.2%

7125 Tømrere 14 1.2%

7126 Vei- og anleggsarbeidere 1 0.1%

7127 Tunnel- og fjellarbeidere, sprengningsarbeidere o.l. 2 0.2%

7128 Stillasbyggere 2 0.2%

7129 Anleggsgartnere 0

7131 Taktekkere 0

7132 Isolatører og kapslere 0

7133 Glassarbeidere 0

7134 Rørleggere og VVS-montører 13 1.1%

7141 Malere og byggtapetserere 2 0.2%

Page 328: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 328 -

# v260: R's primary occupation/profession - code

Value Label Cases Percentage

7142 Overflatebehandlere og lakkerere 1 0.1%

7143 Sandblåsere o.l. 0

7144 Feiere 0

7211 Støpere 0

7212 Sveisere 4 0.3%

7213 Kopper- og blikkenslagere 0

7214 Platearbeidere 2 0.2%

7215 Riggere og spleisere 0

7216 Dykkere 1 0.1%

7217 Bilskadereparatører 0

7221 Smeder 0

7222 Børsemakere, låsesmeder o.l. 0

7231 Bilmekanikere 5 0.4%

7232 Mekanikere innen flytekniske fag 0

7233 Landbruks- og anleggsmaskinmekanikere 1 0.1%

7234 Motormekanikere 0

7235 Automatikkmekanikere 0

7236 Finmekanikere 0

7237 Industrimekanikere 6 0.5%

7241 Elektrikere, elektronikere o.l. 15 1.3%

7242 Service- og telemontører 1 0.1%

7243 Automatikere, tavlemontører, viklere og transformatormontøre 0

7244 Energimontører 1 0.1%

7311 Instrumentmakere og -reparatører 2 0.2%

7312 Musikkinstrumentmakere og -stemmere 0

7313 Gull- og sølvsmeder, gravører o.l. 1 0.1%

7321 Keramikere og pottemakere 0

7322 Glasshåndverkere 0

7331 Kunsthåndverkere i tre o.l. 0

7332 Kunsthåndverkere i tekstil, lær o.l. 0

7341 Grafikere (førtrykk) o.l. 2 0.2%

7342 Fotografer 1 0.1%

7350 Tekniske tegnere 1 0.1%

7411 Slaktere, fiskehandlere o.l. 3 0.3%

7412 Bakere og konditorer 2 0.2%

7413 Prøvesmakere og kvalitetsbedømmere av mat og drikke 0

7419 Andre håndverkere innen næringsmiddelproduksjon 0

7421 Snekkere 6 0.5%

7422 Trebåtbyggere 0

7423 Kurvmakere o.l. 0

7431 Vevere, strikkere o.l. (innen husflidsproduksjon) 0

7432 Skreddere, kjole- og draktsyere, modister o.l. 0

7433 Buntmakere 0

Page 329: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 329 -

# v260: R's primary occupation/profession - code

Value Label Cases Percentage

7434 Gradører 0

7435 Parykkmakere 0

7436 Møbeltapetserere o.l. 0

7441 Skinnberedere og garvere 0

7442 Skomakere 0

7443 Taksidermister 0

7450 Laboranter 0

8111 Bergfagarbeidere 0

8112 Prosessoperatører (oppredning) 2 0.2%

8113 Operatører innen olje- og gassutvinning 6 0.5%

8114 Brønnserviceoperatører (olje- og gassutvinning) 0

8121 Operatører innen metallurgisk prosessfag 0

8122 Metallformere 0

8131 Keramiske formere og dekoratører 0

8132 Operatører innen glassproduksjon 0

8139 Andre operatører innen glass- og keramikkproduksjon 0

8141 Operatører innen produksjon og videreforedling av trelastpro 1 0.1%

8142 Operatører innen treforedlingsindustri 2 0.2%

8143 Operatører innen spon- og fiberplateproduksjon 2 0.2%

8151 Operatører ved olje- og naturgassraffineringsanlegg 2 0.2%

8159 Operatører innen annen kjemisk prosessindustri 3 0.3%

8161 Energioperatører 1 0.1%

8162 Operatører ved forbrennings-, kjøle- og vannrenseanlegg mv. 2 0.2%

8211 Operatører innen metallvareproduksjon 1 0.1%

8212 Verktøymakere o.l. 1 0.1%

8213 Maskinarbeidere 2 0.2%

8214 Operatører innen produksjon av betongprodukter mv. 1 0.1%

8221 Operatører innen produksjon av hygieniske og farmasøytiske p 1 0.1%

8222 Operatører innen ammunisjons- og sprengstoffproduksjon 0

8223 Operatører innen gummiproduksjon 0

8224 Operatører innen plastfag og plastproduksjon 1 0.1%

8225 Operatører innen maling- og lakkproduksjon 1 0.1%

8229 Operatører innen annen kjemisk-teknisk produksjon 0

8251 Grafiske trykkere 0

8252 Bokbindere 0

8253 Operatører innen kartonasje 0

8254 Fotolaboranter 0

8261 Spinne- og nøstemaskinoperatører 1 0.1%

8262 Veve- og hekle/strikkemaskinoperatører o.l. 1 0.1%

8263 Industrisyere 1 0.1%

8264 Tekstiloperatører innen fiskeredskap 0

8265 Tilskjærere 0

8266 Operatører innen farging, vasking, rensing mv. av tekstil o. 1 0.1%

Page 330: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 330 -

# v260: R's primary occupation/profession - code

Value Label Cases Percentage

8267 Operatører innen produksjon av sko, vesker mv. 0

8269 Andre operatører innen tekstilproduksjon o.l. 0

8271 Fagarbeidere innen bearbeiding av fisk og fiskeprodukter 0

8272 Operatører innen bearbeiding av kjøtt og kjøttprodukter 1 0.1%

8273 Operatører av maskiner for fremstilling av meieriprodukter 0

8274 Operatører av møller for korn og krydder 0

8275 Operatører av maskiner for fremstilling og bearbeiding av ba 1 0.1%

8276 Operatører av maskiner for bearbeiding av frukt, grønnsaker 1 0.1%

8277 Bryggere og maskinoperatører innen fremstilling av mineralva 1 0.1%

8279 Operatører innen annen næringsmiddelproduksjon 1 0.1%

8281 Montører innen produksjon av transportmidler 0

8282 Operatører og montører innen produksjon av elektronisk utsty 2 0.2%

8311 Lokomotivførere og lokomotivkontrollører 0

8312 Skiftekonduktører 0

8321 Bil-, drosje- og varebilførere 11 0.9%

8322 Buss- og sporvognførere 4 0.3%

8323 Lastebil- og vogntogførere 12 1.0%

8331 Anleggsmaskinførere 7 0.6%

8332 Kran- og heisførere o.l. 0

8333 Truckførere 0

8341 Dekksmannskap (skip) 2 0.2%

8342 Maskinmannskap (skip) 0

9120 Forefallende arbeid for privatpersoner og -husholdninger 0

9131 Rengjørings-/husarbeidspersonale i privathusholdninger 10 0.8%

9132 Rengjøringspersonale i bedrifter o.l. 4 0.3%

9133 Kjøkken- og anretningsassistenter 4 0.3%

9141 Vinduspussere 0

9142 Bilklargjørere 2 0.2%

9151 Bud o.l. 1 0.1%

9152 Vakter og dørvakter 1 0.1%

9153 Måleavlesere o.l. 0

9160 Renovasjonsarbeidere o.l. 0

9210 Hjelpearbeidere innen jordbruk, skogbruk og fiske 0

9310 Hjelpearbeidere innen bygg, anlegg, vedlikehold o.l. 1 0.1%

9320 Hjelpearbeidere innen industri 3 0.3%

9330 Hjelpearbeidere innen lager og godshåndtering 1 0.1%

9999 Uoppgitt 8 0.7%

Sysmiss 605Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v261: A superior position

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1177 /-] [Invalid=605 /-]

Literal question Would you say that this is/was a superior position?

Page 331: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 331 -

# v261: A superior position

Interviewer's instructions If answered 'working' in bak5a.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 415 35.3%

2 No 761 64.7%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 1 0.1%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v262: Job description

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1177 /-] [Invalid=605 /-]

Literal question Did you work in your primary occupation as an employee, as an independent with hired help, as an independent withouthired help, or as a family member with no regular, fixed income?

Interviewer's instructions If answered 'working' in bak5a.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Employed 1060 90.1%

2 Independent with hired help 52 4.4%

3 Independent without hired help 59 5.0%

4 Familymember 4 0.3%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 2 0.2%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v263: Employer description

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1064 /-] [Invalid=718 /-]

Literal question Was this business/industry a privately owned firm, a joint-stock company, an organisation, in municipal, county or publicservice?

Interviewer's instructions If answered 'working' in bak5a.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Privately owned firm 56 5.3%

2 Joint-stock company 509 47.8%

3 Organisation 33 3.1%

4 Local service 254 23.9%

5 County service 39 3.7%

6 Public service 172 16.2%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 1 0.1%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v264: In paid employment until the time began to receive a pension/welfare benefit

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=360 /-] [Invalid=1422 /-]

Literal question Were you in paid employment until the time you began to receive a pension/welfare benefit?

Interviewer's instructions Bak8a is asked to persons who do not consider themselves as working or students7pupils. Others go to bak14/18.

Page 332: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 332 -

# v264: In paid employment until the time began to receive a pension/welfare benefit

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 305 84.7%

2 No 54 15.0%

8 Won't answer 1 0.3%

9 Don't know 0Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v265: Paid employment previously

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=56 /-] [Invalid=1726 /-]

Literal question Were you in a paid employment previously?

Interviewer's instructions If answered 'yes' in bak8a.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 55 98.2%

2 No 1 1.8%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 0Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v266: Did R. supervise the work of others

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=360 /-] [Invalid=1422 /-]

Literal question Did you have any tasks which involved supervising the work of others?

Interviewer's instructions If answered 'yes' in bak8a.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 140 38.9%

2 No 220 61.1%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 0Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v267: R's last primary occupation/profession

Information [Type= discrete] [Format=numeric] [Range= 0-9999] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=360 /-] [Invalid=1422 /-]

Literal question What was your last primary occupation/profession?

Value Label Cases Percentage

0 Uoppgitt eller yrker som ikke kan identifiseres 2 0.6%

111 Menige 0

112 Befal I 2 0.6%

113 Befal II 0

1110 Politikere 0

1120 Toppledere i offentlig administrasjon 0

1141 Ledere i partipolitiske organisasjoner 0

1142 Ledere i arb.giver-arb.takerorganisasjoner og økonomiske int 0

Page 333: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 333 -

# v267: R's last primary occupation/profession

Value Label Cases Percentage

1143 Ledere i humanitære organisasjoner og andre interesseorganis 1 0.3%

1210 Administrerende direktører 9 2.5%

1220 Produksjonsdirektører innen ikke-spesifisert næringsområde 0

1221 Produksjonsdirektører innen jordbruk, skogbruk og fiske 0

1222 Produksjonsdirektører innen olje- og gassutvinning, bergverk 3 0.8%

1223 Produksjonsdirektører innen bygge- og anleggsvirksomhet 1 0.3%

1224 Produksjonsdirektører innen varehandel, hotell- og restauran 0

1225 Produksjonsdirektører innen transport og kommunikasjon 0

1226 Produksjonsdirektører innen finansiell tjenesteyting, eiendo 3 0.8%

1227 Produksjonsdirektører innen offentlig administrasjon 7 1.9%

1228 Produksjonsdirektører innen undervisning, helse- og sosialtj 3 0.8%

1229 Produksjonsdirektører innen andre sosiale og personlige tjen 0

1231 Finans-, økonomi- og administrasjonsdirektører 3 0.8%

1232 Personaldirektører 3 0.8%

1233 Salgsdirektører 2 0.6%

1234 Markeds- og informasjonsdirektører 2 0.6%

1235 Innkjøps- og distribusjonsdirektører 2 0.6%

1236 IT-direktører 0

1237 Forskningsdirektører 0

1239 Andre spesialdirektører 0

1310 Ledere innen ikke-spesifisert næringsområde 5 1.4%

1311 Ledere innen jordbruk, skogbruk og fiske 0

1312 Ledere innen bergverksdrift, industri, kraft- og vannforsyni 4 1.1%

1313 Ledere innen bygge- og anleggsvirksomhet 0

1314 Ledere innen varehandel mv. 1 0.3%

1315 Ledere innen hotell- og restaurantvirksomhet 0

1316 Ledere innen transport og kommunikasjon 0

1317 Ledere innen finansiell tjenesteyting, eiendomsdrift osv. 0

1318 Ledere innen renovasjon, personlig tjenesteyting og arbeid f 0

1319 Andre ledere 2 0.6%

1320 2 0.6%

2111 Fysikere og astronomer 0

2112 Meteorologer 0

2113 Kjemikere 1 0.3%

2114 Geologer og geofysikere 0

2121 Matematikere og tilsvarende yrker 0

2122 Statistikere 0

2130 Systemutviklere og programmerere 3 0.8%

2141 Sivilarkitekter, by og trafikkplanleggere 2 0.6%

2142 Sivilingeniører (bygg og anlegg) 0

2143 Sivilingeniører (elkraftteknikk) 0

2144 Sivilingeniører (elektronikk og telekommunikasjon) 2 0.6%

2145 Sivilingeniører (maskin- og marinteknikk) 0

Page 334: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 334 -

# v267: R's last primary occupation/profession

Value Label Cases Percentage

2146 Sivilingeniører (kjemi) 0

2147 Sivilingeniører (geofag, petroleumsteknologi, metallurgi o.l 1 0.3%

2148 Landmålere, jordskiftekandidater o.l. 0

2149 Andre sivilingeniører og tilsvarende yrker 0

2211 Biologer, botanikere, zoologer og tilsvarende yrker 0

2212 Sivilagronomer og tilsvarende yrker 0

2221 Leger 0

2222 Tannleger 2 0.6%

2223 Veterinærer 0

2224 Farmasøyter 1 0.3%

2225 Ernæringsfysiologer 0

2230 Spesialsykepleiere og jordmødre 4 1.1%

2310 Universitets- og høyskolelektorer/-lærere 3 0.8%

2320 Lektorer og adjunkter i videregående skole 2 0.6%

2340 Spesiallærere/spesialpedagoger 1 0.3%

2351 Spesialister i utdanningsmetodikk 0

2352 Studieinspektører o.l. 0

2359 Andre lærere med minst 4 års universitets- eller høyskoleutd 0

2411 Økonomisk og samfunnsvitenskapelig planlegging og utredning 3 0.8%

2412 Juridisk planlegging og utredning 0

2413 Teknisk og naturvitenskapelig planlegging og utredning 0

2419 Andre yrker innen offentlig administrajon 3 0.8%

2511 Statsautoriserte revisorer 0

2512 Personal- og organisasjonskonsulenter 2 0.6%

2519 Markedsanalytikere og andre forretningsyrker 0

2521 Advokater 0

2522 Domstolsjurister 0

2523 Jurister innen politi og påtalemyndighet 0

2531 Arkivarer og konservatorer 0

2532 Universitetsbibliotekarer 0

2541 Sosial- og siviløkonomer 1 0.3%

2542 Sosiologer, sosialantropologer, samfunnsgeografer og statsvi 0

2543 Historikere, arkeologer og filosofer 0

2544 Språkforskere, oversettere og tolker 0

2545 Psykologer 0

2551 Forfattere og andre skribenter 0

2552 Skulptører, kunstmalere og andre billedkunstnere 1 0.3%

2553 Dirigenter, komponister, musikere og sangere 0

2554 Koreografer og dansere 0

2555 Skuespillere og regissører 0

2560 Geistlige yrker 0

3111 Bygningsingeniører og -teknikere 4 1.1%

3112 Elkraftingeniører og -teknikere 1 0.3%

Page 335: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 335 -

# v267: R's last primary occupation/profession

Value Label Cases Percentage

3113 Elektronikk- og telekommunikasjonsingeniører og -teknikere 0

3114 Maskiningeniører og -teknikere 0

3115 Kjemiingeniører og -teknikere 0

3116 Ingeniører og teknikere innen petroleum, bergverk og metallu 0

3119 Andre ingeniører og teknikere 1 0.3%

3120 Dataingeniører og -teknikere 0

3131 Filmfotografer og innspillingsteknikere 0

3132 Operatører av kringkastings- og telekommunikasjonsutstyr 0

3139 Andre operatører av optisk og elektronisk utstyr 0

3141 Skipsmaskinister 2 0.6%

3142 Dekksoffiserer og loser 1 0.3%

3143 Flygere 0

3144 Flygeledere o.l. 0

3151 Branninspektører 1 0.3%

3152 Sikkerhetsinspektører 0

3211 Bioingeniører og -teknikere 0

3212 Agroteknikere 1 0.3%

3213 Skogingeniører, skogkonsulenter o.l. 0

3221 Radiografer og audiografer 0

3222 Helse- og miljøinspektører 0

3223 Kostholdskonsulenter 0

3224 Optikere 1 0.3%

3225 Tannpleiere 0

3226 Fysioterapeuter, ergoterapeuter o.l. 2 0.6%

3227 Dyrepleiere 1 0.3%

3228 Reseptarer 0

3229 Naturterapeuter 0

3231 Sykepleiere 2 0.6%

3232 Vernepleiere 4 1.1%

3310 Grunnskolelærere 17 4.7%

3320 Førskolelærere 3 0.8%

3341 Yrkesfaglærere og faglærere i videregående skole 1 0.3%

3349 Andre yrker innen undervisning og pedagogisk arbeid 0

3411 Finansmeglere 0

3412 Forsikringskonsulenter 4 1.1%

3413 Eiendomsmeglere og -forvaltere 0

3414 Reisekonsulenter 0

3415 Tekniske og kommersielle salgsrepresentanter 5 1.4%

3416 Innkjøpere 1 0.3%

3417 Takstmenn, takstinspektører og auksjonarier 0

3418 Kundebehandlere (banktjenester) 2 0.6%

3419 Markedsførings- og reklamekonsulenter 2 0.6%

3421 Handels- og skipsmeglere 0

Page 336: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 336 -

# v267: R's last primary occupation/profession

Value Label Cases Percentage

3422 Speditører og befraktere 1 0.3%

3423 Kunde-/ personalkonsulenter (vikarbyrå) 0

3429 Andre forretningsmeglere 0

3431 Funksjonærer innen administrasjon 3 0.8%

3432 Revisorer (ikke statsautoriserte) og regnskapsførere 1 0.3%

3433 Husøkonomer 1 0.3%

3441 Tollfunksjonærer 0

3442 Lavere saksbehandlere ved ligningskontor 0

3443 Lavere saksbehandlere ved trygdekontor 0

3444 Lavere saksbehandlere ved arbeidskontor 0

3449 Andre lavere saksbehandlere innen offentlig administrasjon 1 0.3%

3450 Polititjenestemenn 1 0.3%

3460 Sosionomer, barnevernspedagoger o.l. 0

3471 Dekoratører, designere og reklametegnere 2 0.6%

3472 Sangere og musikere i underholdningsbransjen 0

3473 Klovner, tryllekunstnere, akrobater o.l. 0

3474 Inspisienter mfl. 0

3475 Idrettsutøvere og -trenere 0

3480 Religiøse yrker 1 0.3%

3491 Informasjonsmedarbeidere og journalister 3 0.8%

3492 Programsekretærer og programmedarbeidere 0

3493 Bibliotekarer 1 0.3%

4111 Stenografer, referenter o.l. 0

4112 Dataregistrerere (puncheoperatører) 0

4113 Sekretærer 11 3.1%

4114 Kontormedarbeidere 8 2.2%

4121 Økonomimedarbeidere og revisjonsassistenter 4 1.1%

4129 Andre tallbehandlere 0

4131 Lagermedarbeidere og materialforvaltere 4 1.1%

4132 Logistikere 0

4133 Transportfunksjonærer 1 0.3%

4141 Bibliotek- og arkivmedarbeidere 0

4142 Postbud og -sorterere 2 0.6%

4211 Billettører og billettselgere 1 0.3%

4212 Post- og bankkasserere 0

4213 Bingoverter o.l. 1 0.3%

4214 Pantelånere 0

4215 Inkassomedarbeidere 0

4221 Reisebyråmedarbeidere o.l. 0

4222 Resepsjonister og opplysningsmedarbeidere 0

4223 Sentralbordoperatører 1 0.3%

5111 Verter/vertinner på fly, skip og tog 0

5112 Konduktører og billettører (om bord i transportmidler) 0

Page 337: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 337 -

# v267: R's last primary occupation/profession

Value Label Cases Percentage

5113 Reiseledere og guider 1 0.3%

5121 Internatledere o.l. 0

5122 Kokker 5 1.4%

5123 Hovmestere, servitører og barkeepere 1 0.3%

5131 Barne- og ungdomsarbeidere o.l. 8 2.2%

5132 Omsorgsarbeidere og hjelpepleiere 14 3.9%

5133 Hjemmehjelpere 3 0.8%

5134 Tannlegesekretærer 0

5135 Legesekretærer 0

5136 Dagmammaer, praktikanter o.l. 0

5137 Apotekteknikere 0

5139 Annet pleie- og omsorgspersonale 3 0.8%

5141 Frisører, kosmetologer o.l. 2 0.6%

5142 Begravelsesbyrå- og krematoriearbeidere 0

5143 Slankeverter, solstudioverter o.l. 0

5149 Andre yrker innen personlig tjenesteyting 0

5161 Brannkonstabler o.l. 1 0.3%

5162 Fengselsbetjenter 1 0.3%

5163 Vaktmestere o.l. 7 1.9%

5164 Vektere o.l. 0

5169 Annet sikkerhetspersonale 0

5210 Mannekenger og andre modeller 0

5221 Butikkmedarbeidere o.l. 14 3.9%

5222 Blomsterdekoratører 0

5223 Dør- og telefonselgere 1 0.3%

5224 Selgere (engros) 0

5225 Intervjuere 0

6111 Korn-, grønnsaks-, frukt- og bærprodusenter 2 0.6%

6112 Gartneriarbeidere 0

6121 Melke- og husdyrprodusenter 5 1.4%

6122 Egg- og fjærfeprodusenter 0

6129 Andre dyreoppdrettere og røktere 0

6130 Plante- og husdyrprodusenter (kombinasjonsbruk) 1 0.3%

6210 Skogsarbeidere o.l. 0

6310 Fiskeoppdrettere o.l. 0

6411 Fiskere 2 0.6%

6412 Fangstfolk 0

7110 Steinfagarbeidere, steinhoggere o.l. 0

7121 Murere mfl. 0

7122 Betong- og grunnarbeidere (bygg) 1 0.3%

7123 Jernbindere 0

7124 Forskalingssnekkere 0

7125 Tømrere 2 0.6%

Page 338: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 338 -

# v267: R's last primary occupation/profession

Value Label Cases Percentage

7126 Vei- og anleggsarbeidere 4 1.1%

7127 Tunnel- og fjellarbeidere, sprengningsarbeidere o.l. 1 0.3%

7128 Stillasbyggere 1 0.3%

7129 Anleggsgartnere 0

7131 Taktekkere 0

7132 Isolatører og kapslere 0

7133 Glassarbeidere 0

7134 Rørleggere og VVS-montører 3 0.8%

7141 Malere og byggtapetserere 5 1.4%

7142 Overflatebehandlere og lakkerere 1 0.3%

7143 Sandblåsere o.l. 1 0.3%

7144 Feiere 0

7211 Støpere 1 0.3%

7212 Sveisere 1 0.3%

7213 Kopper- og blikkenslagere 1 0.3%

7214 Platearbeidere 0

7215 Riggere og spleisere 0

7216 Dykkere 0

7217 Bilskadereparatører 0

7221 Smeder 0

7222 Børsemakere, låsesmeder o.l. 0

7231 Bilmekanikere 3 0.8%

7232 Mekanikere innen flytekniske fag 0

7233 Landbruks- og anleggsmaskinmekanikere 0

7234 Motormekanikere 1 0.3%

7235 Automatikkmekanikere 0

7236 Finmekanikere 0

7237 Industrimekanikere 5 1.4%

7241 Elektrikere, elektronikere o.l. 2 0.6%

7242 Service- og telemontører 0

7243 Automatikere, tavlemontører, viklere og transformatormontøre 0

7244 Energimontører 0

7311 Instrumentmakere og -reparatører 0

7312 Musikkinstrumentmakere og -stemmere 0

7313 Gull- og sølvsmeder, gravører o.l. 0

7321 Keramikere og pottemakere 0

7322 Glasshåndverkere 0

7331 Kunsthåndverkere i tre o.l. 0

7332 Kunsthåndverkere i tekstil, lær o.l. 0

7341 Grafikere (førtrykk) o.l. 1 0.3%

7342 Fotografer 0

7350 Tekniske tegnere 1 0.3%

7411 Slaktere, fiskehandlere o.l. 2 0.6%

Page 339: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 339 -

# v267: R's last primary occupation/profession

Value Label Cases Percentage

7412 Bakere og konditorer 0

7413 Prøvesmakere og kvalitetsbedømmere av mat og drikke 0

7419 Andre håndverkere innen næringsmiddelproduksjon 0

7421 Snekkere 1 0.3%

7422 Trebåtbyggere 0

7423 Kurvmakere o.l. 0

7431 Vevere, strikkere o.l. (innen husflidsproduksjon) 1 0.3%

7432 Skreddere, kjole- og draktsyere, modister o.l. 0

7433 Buntmakere 0

7434 Gradører 0

7435 Parykkmakere 0

7436 Møbeltapetserere o.l. 0

7441 Skinnberedere og garvere 0

7442 Skomakere 0

7443 Taksidermister 0

7450 Laboranter 0

8111 Bergfagarbeidere 1 0.3%

8112 Prosessoperatører (oppredning) 1 0.3%

8113 Operatører innen olje- og gassutvinning 0

8114 Brønnserviceoperatører (olje- og gassutvinning) 0

8121 Operatører innen metallurgisk prosessfag 2 0.6%

8122 Metallformere 0

8131 Keramiske formere og dekoratører 0

8132 Operatører innen glassproduksjon 1 0.3%

8139 Andre operatører innen glass- og keramikkproduksjon 0

8141 Operatører innen produksjon og videreforedling av trelastpro 0

8142 Operatører innen treforedlingsindustri 2 0.6%

8143 Operatører innen spon- og fiberplateproduksjon 0

8151 Operatører ved olje- og naturgassraffineringsanlegg 0

8159 Operatører innen annen kjemisk prosessindustri 2 0.6%

8161 Energioperatører 0

8162 Operatører ved forbrennings-, kjøle- og vannrenseanlegg mv. 0

8211 Operatører innen metallvareproduksjon 0

8212 Verktøymakere o.l. 0

8213 Maskinarbeidere 1 0.3%

8214 Operatører innen produksjon av betongprodukter mv. 1 0.3%

8221 Operatører innen produksjon av hygieniske og farmasøytiske p 0

8222 Operatører innen ammunisjons- og sprengstoffproduksjon 0

8223 Operatører innen gummiproduksjon 0

8224 Operatører innen plastfag og plastproduksjon 0

8225 Operatører innen maling- og lakkproduksjon 0

8229 Operatører innen annen kjemisk-teknisk produksjon 0

8251 Grafiske trykkere 0

Page 340: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 340 -

# v267: R's last primary occupation/profession

Value Label Cases Percentage

8252 Bokbindere 1 0.3%

8253 Operatører innen kartonasje 0

8254 Fotolaboranter 0

8261 Spinne- og nøstemaskinoperatører 0

8262 Veve- og hekle/strikkemaskinoperatører o.l. 0

8263 Industrisyere 1 0.3%

8264 Tekstiloperatører innen fiskeredskap 0

8265 Tilskjærere 0

8266 Operatører innen farging, vasking, rensing mv. av tekstil o. 1 0.3%

8267 Operatører innen produksjon av sko, vesker mv. 0

8269 Andre operatører innen tekstilproduksjon o.l. 0

8271 Fagarbeidere innen bearbeiding av fisk og fiskeprodukter 2 0.6%

8272 Operatører innen bearbeiding av kjøtt og kjøttprodukter 0

8273 Operatører av maskiner for fremstilling av meieriprodukter 0

8274 Operatører av møller for korn og krydder 0

8275 Operatører av maskiner for fremstilling og bearbeiding av ba 0

8276 Operatører av maskiner for bearbeiding av frukt, grønnsaker 0

8277 Bryggere og maskinoperatører innen fremstilling av mineralva 0

8279 Operatører innen annen næringsmiddelproduksjon 1 0.3%

8281 Montører innen produksjon av transportmidler 1 0.3%

8282 Operatører og montører innen produksjon av elektronisk utsty 1 0.3%

8311 Lokomotivførere og lokomotivkontrollører 0

8312 Skiftekonduktører 0

8321 Bil-, drosje- og varebilførere 5 1.4%

8322 Buss- og sporvognførere 2 0.6%

8323 Lastebil- og vogntogførere 1 0.3%

8331 Anleggsmaskinførere 0

8332 Kran- og heisførere o.l. 2 0.6%

8333 Truckførere 1 0.3%

8341 Dekksmannskap (skip) 2 0.6%

8342 Maskinmannskap (skip) 1 0.3%

9120 Forefallende arbeid for privatpersoner og -husholdninger 0

9131 Rengjørings-/husarbeidspersonale i privathusholdninger 7 1.9%

9132 Rengjøringspersonale i bedrifter o.l. 4 1.1%

9133 Kjøkken- og anretningsassistenter 3 0.8%

9141 Vinduspussere 0

9142 Bilklargjørere 0

9151 Bud o.l. 0

9152 Vakter og dørvakter 1 0.3%

9153 Måleavlesere o.l. 0

9160 Renovasjonsarbeidere o.l. 0

9210 Hjelpearbeidere innen jordbruk, skogbruk og fiske 0

9310 Hjelpearbeidere innen bygg, anlegg, vedlikehold o.l. 0

Page 341: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 341 -

# v267: R's last primary occupation/profession

Value Label Cases Percentage

9320 Hjelpearbeidere innen industri 6 1.7%

9330 Hjelpearbeidere innen lager og godshåndtering 0

9999 Uoppgitt 3 0.8%

Sysmiss 1422Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v268: R's previous normal working hours

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 0-999] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=360 /-] [Invalid=1422 /-]

Literal question How many hours a week did you usually work in that job?

Interviewer's instructions If R had highly variable working hours per week, list up an estimate of average working hours per week.

# v269: Former job description

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=360 /-] [Invalid=1422 /-]

Literal question Did you work in your primary occupation as an employee, as an independent with hired help, as an independent withouthired help, or as a family member with no regular, fixed income?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Employed 315 87.5%

2 Independent with hired help 21 5.8%

3 Independent without hired help 21 5.8%

4 Familymember 1 0.3%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 2 0.6%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v270: Superior position?

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=315 /-] [Invalid=1467 /-]

Literal question Would you say that this is/was a superior position?

Interviewer's instructions If answered 'yes' in bak11.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 94 29.8%

2 No 221 70.2%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 0Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v271: Former employer description

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=315 /-] [Invalid=1467 /-]

Literal question Was this business/industry a privately owned firm, a joint-stock company, an organisation, in municipal, county or publicservice?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Privately owned firm 26 8.3%

Page 342: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 342 -

# v271: Former employer description

Value Label Cases Percentage

2 Joint-stock company 141 44.8%

3 Organisation 21 6.7%

4 Local service 79 25.1%

5 County service 9 2.9%

6 Public service 39 12.4%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 0Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v272: Spouse/partner currently in paid employment

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1209 /-] [Invalid=573 /-]

Literal question Is your spouse/partner currently in paid employment?

Post-question As paid work, we also count work as a family member without fixed wages on farms, in business and in family business.Work for an hour or more per day is included

Interviewer's instructions If R is married or cohabiting ask questions 14 to 17, otherwise skip to bak18.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 873 72.2%

2 No 332 27.5%

8 Won't answer 2 0.2%

9 Don't know 2 0.2%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v273: Spouse/partner's most important activity or source of income

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=332 /-] [Invalid=1450 /-]

Literal question What is your spouse/partner's most important activity or source of income?

Interviewer's instructions If answered 'no' or 'don't know' in bak14.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Student 31 9.3%

2 Domestic worker 29 8.7%

3 Old-age pensioner 156 47.0%

4 Unemployed 21 6.3%

5 Early retiree, reveiving disability benefits 83 25.0%

6 Conscript, draftee 0

7 Other 11 3.3%

8 Won't answer 1 0.3%

9 Don't know 0Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v274: spouse/partner in paid employment until the time he/she began to receive a pension/welfare benefit?

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=260 /-] [Invalid=1522 /-]

Literal question Was your spouse/partner in paid employment until the time he/she began to receive a pension/welfare benefit?

Page 343: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 343 -

# v274: spouse/partner in paid employment until the time he/she began to receive a pension/welfare benefit?

Interviewer's instructions If answered 'old-age pensioner', 'unemployed' or 'early retiree, reveiving disability benefits' in bak15a.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 221 85.0%

2 No 39 15.0%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 0Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v275: R's spouse supervised the work of others

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1094 /-] [Invalid=688 /-]

Literal question Did/does he/she have any tasks which involved supervising the work of others?

Interviewer's instructions If answered 'yes' in bak15b.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 404 36.9%

2 No 689 63.0%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 1 0.1%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v276: R's spouse/partner's last primary occupation/profession

Information [Type= discrete] [Format=numeric] [Range= 0-9999] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1094 /-] [Invalid=688 /-]

Literal question What was your spouse/partner's last primary occupation/profession?

Value Label Cases Percentage

0 Uoppgitt eller yrker som ikke kan identifiseres 5 0.5%

111 Menige 0

112 Befal I 2 0.2%

113 Befal II 2 0.2%

1110 Politikere 1 0.1%

1120 Toppledere i offentlig administrasjon 4 0.4%

1141 Ledere i partipolitiske organisasjoner 0

1142 Ledere i arb.giver-arb.takerorganisasjoner og økonomiske int 2 0.2%

1143 Ledere i humanitære organisasjoner og andre interesseorganis 0

1210 Administrerende direktører 31 2.8%

1220 Produksjonsdirektører innen ikke-spesifisert næringsområde 0

1221 Produksjonsdirektører innen jordbruk, skogbruk og fiske 1 0.1%

1222 Produksjonsdirektører innen olje- og gassutvinning, bergverk 7 0.6%

1223 Produksjonsdirektører innen bygge- og anleggsvirksomhet 4 0.4%

1224 Produksjonsdirektører innen varehandel, hotell- og restauran 5 0.5%

1225 Produksjonsdirektører innen transport og kommunikasjon 2 0.2%

1226 Produksjonsdirektører innen finansiell tjenesteyting, eiendo 6 0.5%

1227 Produksjonsdirektører innen offentlig administrasjon 12 1.1%

1228 Produksjonsdirektører innen undervisning, helse- og sosialtj 13 1.2%

Page 344: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 344 -

# v276: R's spouse/partner's last primary occupation/profession

Value Label Cases Percentage

1229 Produksjonsdirektører innen andre sosiale og personlige tjen 0

1231 Finans-, økonomi- og administrasjonsdirektører 11 1.0%

1232 Personaldirektører 1 0.1%

1233 Salgsdirektører 9 0.8%

1234 Markeds- og informasjonsdirektører 5 0.5%

1235 Innkjøps- og distribusjonsdirektører 6 0.5%

1236 IT-direktører 1 0.1%

1237 Forskningsdirektører 1 0.1%

1239 Andre spesialdirektører 3 0.3%

1310 Ledere innen ikke-spesifisert næringsområde 16 1.5%

1311 Ledere innen jordbruk, skogbruk og fiske 0

1312 Ledere innen bergverksdrift, industri, kraft- og vannforsyni 5 0.5%

1313 Ledere innen bygge- og anleggsvirksomhet 0

1314 Ledere innen varehandel mv. 10 0.9%

1315 Ledere innen hotell- og restaurantvirksomhet 1 0.1%

1316 Ledere innen transport og kommunikasjon 1 0.1%

1317 Ledere innen finansiell tjenesteyting, eiendomsdrift osv. 0

1318 Ledere innen renovasjon, personlig tjenesteyting og arbeid f 0

1319 Andre ledere 3 0.3%

1320 1 0.1%

2111 Fysikere og astronomer 0

2112 Meteorologer 1 0.1%

2113 Kjemikere 1 0.1%

2114 Geologer og geofysikere 1 0.1%

2121 Matematikere og tilsvarende yrker 0

2122 Statistikere 3 0.3%

2130 Systemutviklere og programmerere 19 1.7%

2141 Sivilarkitekter, by og trafikkplanleggere 6 0.5%

2142 Sivilingeniører (bygg og anlegg) 1 0.1%

2143 Sivilingeniører (elkraftteknikk) 2 0.2%

2144 Sivilingeniører (elektronikk og telekommunikasjon) 3 0.3%

2145 Sivilingeniører (maskin- og marinteknikk) 0

2146 Sivilingeniører (kjemi) 1 0.1%

2147 Sivilingeniører (geofag, petroleumsteknologi, metallurgi o.l 6 0.5%

2148 Landmålere, jordskiftekandidater o.l. 0

2149 Andre sivilingeniører og tilsvarende yrker 2 0.2%

2211 Biologer, botanikere, zoologer og tilsvarende yrker 1 0.1%

2212 Sivilagronomer og tilsvarende yrker 0

2221 Leger 9 0.8%

2222 Tannleger 0

2223 Veterinærer 1 0.1%

2224 Farmasøyter 1 0.1%

2225 Ernæringsfysiologer 1 0.1%

Page 345: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 345 -

# v276: R's spouse/partner's last primary occupation/profession

Value Label Cases Percentage

2230 Spesialsykepleiere og jordmødre 13 1.2%

2310 Universitets- og høyskolelektorer/-lærere 11 1.0%

2320 Lektorer og adjunkter i videregående skole 29 2.7%

2340 Spesiallærere/spesialpedagoger 2 0.2%

2351 Spesialister i utdanningsmetodikk 0

2352 Studieinspektører o.l. 3 0.3%

2359 Andre lærere med minst 4 års universitets- eller høyskoleutd 0

2411 Økonomisk og samfunnsvitenskapelig planlegging og utredning 14 1.3%

2412 Juridisk planlegging og utredning 4 0.4%

2413 Teknisk og naturvitenskapelig planlegging og utredning 1 0.1%

2419 Andre yrker innen offentlig administrajon 14 1.3%

2511 Statsautoriserte revisorer 3 0.3%

2512 Personal- og organisasjonskonsulenter 6 0.5%

2519 Markedsanalytikere og andre forretningsyrker 3 0.3%

2521 Advokater 6 0.5%

2522 Domstolsjurister 2 0.2%

2523 Jurister innen politi og påtalemyndighet 1 0.1%

2531 Arkivarer og konservatorer 2 0.2%

2532 Universitetsbibliotekarer 0

2541 Sosial- og siviløkonomer 12 1.1%

2542 Sosiologer, sosialantropologer, samfunnsgeografer og statsvi 0

2543 Historikere, arkeologer og filosofer 0

2544 Språkforskere, oversettere og tolker 0

2545 Psykologer 6 0.5%

2551 Forfattere og andre skribenter 1 0.1%

2552 Skulptører, kunstmalere og andre billedkunstnere 3 0.3%

2553 Dirigenter, komponister, musikere og sangere 0

2554 Koreografer og dansere 0

2555 Skuespillere og regissører 0

2560 Geistlige yrker 1 0.1%

3111 Bygningsingeniører og -teknikere 9 0.8%

3112 Elkraftingeniører og -teknikere 7 0.6%

3113 Elektronikk- og telekommunikasjonsingeniører og -teknikere 4 0.4%

3114 Maskiningeniører og -teknikere 4 0.4%

3115 Kjemiingeniører og -teknikere 4 0.4%

3116 Ingeniører og teknikere innen petroleum, bergverk og metallu 3 0.3%

3119 Andre ingeniører og teknikere 5 0.5%

3120 Dataingeniører og -teknikere 5 0.5%

3131 Filmfotografer og innspillingsteknikere 2 0.2%

3132 Operatører av kringkastings- og telekommunikasjonsutstyr 1 0.1%

3139 Andre operatører av optisk og elektronisk utstyr 0

3141 Skipsmaskinister 4 0.4%

3142 Dekksoffiserer og loser 5 0.5%

Page 346: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 346 -

# v276: R's spouse/partner's last primary occupation/profession

Value Label Cases Percentage

3143 Flygere 1 0.1%

3144 Flygeledere o.l. 0

3151 Branninspektører 0

3152 Sikkerhetsinspektører 0

3211 Bioingeniører og -teknikere 6 0.5%

3212 Agroteknikere 0

3213 Skogingeniører, skogkonsulenter o.l. 0

3221 Radiografer og audiografer 0

3222 Helse- og miljøinspektører 2 0.2%

3223 Kostholdskonsulenter 0

3224 Optikere 1 0.1%

3225 Tannpleiere 1 0.1%

3226 Fysioterapeuter, ergoterapeuter o.l. 7 0.6%

3227 Dyrepleiere 0

3228 Reseptarer 0

3229 Naturterapeuter 0

3231 Sykepleiere 24 2.2%

3232 Vernepleiere 5 0.5%

3310 Grunnskolelærere 47 4.3%

3320 Førskolelærere 15 1.4%

3341 Yrkesfaglærere og faglærere i videregående skole 0

3349 Andre yrker innen undervisning og pedagogisk arbeid 0

3411 Finansmeglere 2 0.2%

3412 Forsikringskonsulenter 8 0.7%

3413 Eiendomsmeglere og -forvaltere 4 0.4%

3414 Reisekonsulenter 3 0.3%

3415 Tekniske og kommersielle salgsrepresentanter 10 0.9%

3416 Innkjøpere 1 0.1%

3417 Takstmenn, takstinspektører og auksjonarier 1 0.1%

3418 Kundebehandlere (banktjenester) 11 1.0%

3419 Markedsførings- og reklamekonsulenter 4 0.4%

3421 Handels- og skipsmeglere 1 0.1%

3422 Speditører og befraktere 2 0.2%

3423 Kunde-/ personalkonsulenter (vikarbyrå) 2 0.2%

3429 Andre forretningsmeglere 2 0.2%

3431 Funksjonærer innen administrasjon 2 0.2%

3432 Revisorer (ikke statsautoriserte) og regnskapsførere 16 1.5%

3433 Husøkonomer 0

3441 Tollfunksjonærer 0

3442 Lavere saksbehandlere ved ligningskontor 1 0.1%

3443 Lavere saksbehandlere ved trygdekontor 0

3444 Lavere saksbehandlere ved arbeidskontor 0

3449 Andre lavere saksbehandlere innen offentlig administrasjon 0

Page 347: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 347 -

# v276: R's spouse/partner's last primary occupation/profession

Value Label Cases Percentage

3450 Polititjenestemenn 2 0.2%

3460 Sosionomer, barnevernspedagoger o.l. 11 1.0%

3471 Dekoratører, designere og reklametegnere 3 0.3%

3472 Sangere og musikere i underholdningsbransjen 0

3473 Klovner, tryllekunstnere, akrobater o.l. 0

3474 Inspisienter mfl. 2 0.2%

3475 Idrettsutøvere og -trenere 1 0.1%

3480 Religiøse yrker 1 0.1%

3491 Informasjonsmedarbeidere og journalister 12 1.1%

3492 Programsekretærer og programmedarbeidere 0

3493 Bibliotekarer 3 0.3%

4111 Stenografer, referenter o.l. 0

4112 Dataregistrerere (puncheoperatører) 0

4113 Sekretærer 16 1.5%

4114 Kontormedarbeidere 22 2.0%

4121 Økonomimedarbeidere og revisjonsassistenter 16 1.5%

4129 Andre tallbehandlere 0

4131 Lagermedarbeidere og materialforvaltere 5 0.5%

4132 Logistikere 2 0.2%

4133 Transportfunksjonærer 3 0.3%

4141 Bibliotek- og arkivmedarbeidere 1 0.1%

4142 Postbud og -sorterere 4 0.4%

4211 Billettører og billettselgere 0

4212 Post- og bankkasserere 4 0.4%

4213 Bingoverter o.l. 0

4214 Pantelånere 0

4215 Inkassomedarbeidere 1 0.1%

4221 Reisebyråmedarbeidere o.l. 0

4222 Resepsjonister og opplysningsmedarbeidere 2 0.2%

4223 Sentralbordoperatører 1 0.1%

5111 Verter/vertinner på fly, skip og tog 1 0.1%

5112 Konduktører og billettører (om bord i transportmidler) 1 0.1%

5113 Reiseledere og guider 0

5121 Internatledere o.l. 0

5122 Kokker 7 0.6%

5123 Hovmestere, servitører og barkeepere 3 0.3%

5131 Barne- og ungdomsarbeidere o.l. 22 2.0%

5132 Omsorgsarbeidere og hjelpepleiere 41 3.7%

5133 Hjemmehjelpere 3 0.3%

5134 Tannlegesekretærer 1 0.1%

5135 Legesekretærer 9 0.8%

5136 Dagmammaer, praktikanter o.l. 0

5137 Apotekteknikere 1 0.1%

Page 348: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 348 -

# v276: R's spouse/partner's last primary occupation/profession

Value Label Cases Percentage

5139 Annet pleie- og omsorgspersonale 7 0.6%

5141 Frisører, kosmetologer o.l. 6 0.5%

5142 Begravelsesbyrå- og krematoriearbeidere 2 0.2%

5143 Slankeverter, solstudioverter o.l. 0

5149 Andre yrker innen personlig tjenesteyting 0

5161 Brannkonstabler o.l. 1 0.1%

5162 Fengselsbetjenter 4 0.4%

5163 Vaktmestere o.l. 11 1.0%

5164 Vektere o.l. 0

5169 Annet sikkerhetspersonale 0

5210 Mannekenger og andre modeller 0

5221 Butikkmedarbeidere o.l. 46 4.2%

5222 Blomsterdekoratører 1 0.1%

5223 Dør- og telefonselgere 1 0.1%

5224 Selgere (engros) 2 0.2%

5225 Intervjuere 0

6111 Korn-, grønnsaks-, frukt- og bærprodusenter 4 0.4%

6112 Gartneriarbeidere 0

6121 Melke- og husdyrprodusenter 14 1.3%

6122 Egg- og fjærfeprodusenter 0

6129 Andre dyreoppdrettere og røktere 0

6130 Plante- og husdyrprodusenter (kombinasjonsbruk) 2 0.2%

6210 Skogsarbeidere o.l. 1 0.1%

6310 Fiskeoppdrettere o.l. 0

6411 Fiskere 3 0.3%

6412 Fangstfolk 0

7110 Steinfagarbeidere, steinhoggere o.l. 0

7121 Murere mfl. 3 0.3%

7122 Betong- og grunnarbeidere (bygg) 1 0.1%

7123 Jernbindere 0

7124 Forskalingssnekkere 1 0.1%

7125 Tømrere 8 0.7%

7126 Vei- og anleggsarbeidere 6 0.5%

7127 Tunnel- og fjellarbeidere, sprengningsarbeidere o.l. 0

7128 Stillasbyggere 1 0.1%

7129 Anleggsgartnere 1 0.1%

7131 Taktekkere 0

7132 Isolatører og kapslere 0

7133 Glassarbeidere 0

7134 Rørleggere og VVS-montører 6 0.5%

7141 Malere og byggtapetserere 3 0.3%

7142 Overflatebehandlere og lakkerere 1 0.1%

7143 Sandblåsere o.l. 0

Page 349: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 349 -

# v276: R's spouse/partner's last primary occupation/profession

Value Label Cases Percentage

7144 Feiere 0

7211 Støpere 0

7212 Sveisere 2 0.2%

7213 Kopper- og blikkenslagere 3 0.3%

7214 Platearbeidere 4 0.4%

7215 Riggere og spleisere 0

7216 Dykkere 0

7217 Bilskadereparatører 0

7221 Smeder 0

7222 Børsemakere, låsesmeder o.l. 0

7231 Bilmekanikere 6 0.5%

7232 Mekanikere innen flytekniske fag 2 0.2%

7233 Landbruks- og anleggsmaskinmekanikere 0

7234 Motormekanikere 0

7235 Automatikkmekanikere 0

7236 Finmekanikere 0

7237 Industrimekanikere 3 0.3%

7241 Elektrikere, elektronikere o.l. 16 1.5%

7242 Service- og telemontører 0

7243 Automatikere, tavlemontører, viklere og transformatormontøre 2 0.2%

7244 Energimontører 1 0.1%

7311 Instrumentmakere og -reparatører 1 0.1%

7312 Musikkinstrumentmakere og -stemmere 0

7313 Gull- og sølvsmeder, gravører o.l. 0

7321 Keramikere og pottemakere 0

7322 Glasshåndverkere 0

7331 Kunsthåndverkere i tre o.l. 0

7332 Kunsthåndverkere i tekstil, lær o.l. 0

7341 Grafikere (førtrykk) o.l. 1 0.1%

7342 Fotografer 0

7350 Tekniske tegnere 0

7411 Slaktere, fiskehandlere o.l. 2 0.2%

7412 Bakere og konditorer 1 0.1%

7413 Prøvesmakere og kvalitetsbedømmere av mat og drikke 0

7419 Andre håndverkere innen næringsmiddelproduksjon 0

7421 Snekkere 8 0.7%

7422 Trebåtbyggere 0

7423 Kurvmakere o.l. 0

7431 Vevere, strikkere o.l. (innen husflidsproduksjon) 1 0.1%

7432 Skreddere, kjole- og draktsyere, modister o.l. 1 0.1%

7433 Buntmakere 0

7434 Gradører 0

7435 Parykkmakere 0

Page 350: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 350 -

# v276: R's spouse/partner's last primary occupation/profession

Value Label Cases Percentage

7436 Møbeltapetserere o.l. 0

7441 Skinnberedere og garvere 0

7442 Skomakere 0

7443 Taksidermister 0

7450 Laboranter 1 0.1%

8111 Bergfagarbeidere 0

8112 Prosessoperatører (oppredning) 1 0.1%

8113 Operatører innen olje- og gassutvinning 3 0.3%

8114 Brønnserviceoperatører (olje- og gassutvinning) 0

8121 Operatører innen metallurgisk prosessfag 2 0.2%

8122 Metallformere 0

8131 Keramiske formere og dekoratører 0

8132 Operatører innen glassproduksjon 0

8139 Andre operatører innen glass- og keramikkproduksjon 0

8141 Operatører innen produksjon og videreforedling av trelastpro 1 0.1%

8142 Operatører innen treforedlingsindustri 3 0.3%

8143 Operatører innen spon- og fiberplateproduksjon 0

8151 Operatører ved olje- og naturgassraffineringsanlegg 3 0.3%

8159 Operatører innen annen kjemisk prosessindustri 3 0.3%

8161 Energioperatører 2 0.2%

8162 Operatører ved forbrennings-, kjøle- og vannrenseanlegg mv. 0

8211 Operatører innen metallvareproduksjon 2 0.2%

8212 Verktøymakere o.l. 0

8213 Maskinarbeidere 3 0.3%

8214 Operatører innen produksjon av betongprodukter mv. 1 0.1%

8221 Operatører innen produksjon av hygieniske og farmasøytiske p 0

8222 Operatører innen ammunisjons- og sprengstoffproduksjon 0

8223 Operatører innen gummiproduksjon 0

8224 Operatører innen plastfag og plastproduksjon 0

8225 Operatører innen maling- og lakkproduksjon 0

8229 Operatører innen annen kjemisk-teknisk produksjon 1 0.1%

8251 Grafiske trykkere 1 0.1%

8252 Bokbindere 0

8253 Operatører innen kartonasje 1 0.1%

8254 Fotolaboranter 0

8261 Spinne- og nøstemaskinoperatører 0

8262 Veve- og hekle/strikkemaskinoperatører o.l. 0

8263 Industrisyere 1 0.1%

8264 Tekstiloperatører innen fiskeredskap 1 0.1%

8265 Tilskjærere 0

8266 Operatører innen farging, vasking, rensing mv. av tekstil o. 0

8267 Operatører innen produksjon av sko, vesker mv. 0

8269 Andre operatører innen tekstilproduksjon o.l. 0

Page 351: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 351 -

# v276: R's spouse/partner's last primary occupation/profession

Value Label Cases Percentage

8271 Fagarbeidere innen bearbeiding av fisk og fiskeprodukter 1 0.1%

8272 Operatører innen bearbeiding av kjøtt og kjøttprodukter 1 0.1%

8273 Operatører av maskiner for fremstilling av meieriprodukter 1 0.1%

8274 Operatører av møller for korn og krydder 0

8275 Operatører av maskiner for fremstilling og bearbeiding av ba 0

8276 Operatører av maskiner for bearbeiding av frukt, grønnsaker 1 0.1%

8277 Bryggere og maskinoperatører innen fremstilling av mineralva 1 0.1%

8279 Operatører innen annen næringsmiddelproduksjon 0

8281 Montører innen produksjon av transportmidler 0

8282 Operatører og montører innen produksjon av elektronisk utsty 2 0.2%

8311 Lokomotivførere og lokomotivkontrollører 1 0.1%

8312 Skiftekonduktører 0

8321 Bil-, drosje- og varebilførere 7 0.6%

8322 Buss- og sporvognførere 3 0.3%

8323 Lastebil- og vogntogførere 8 0.7%

8331 Anleggsmaskinførere 3 0.3%

8332 Kran- og heisførere o.l. 1 0.1%

8333 Truckførere 0

8341 Dekksmannskap (skip) 1 0.1%

8342 Maskinmannskap (skip) 1 0.1%

9120 Forefallende arbeid for privatpersoner og -husholdninger 0

9131 Rengjørings-/husarbeidspersonale i privathusholdninger 15 1.4%

9132 Rengjøringspersonale i bedrifter o.l. 5 0.5%

9133 Kjøkken- og anretningsassistenter 5 0.5%

9141 Vinduspussere 0

9142 Bilklargjørere 2 0.2%

9151 Bud o.l. 0

9152 Vakter og dørvakter 0

9153 Måleavlesere o.l. 0

9160 Renovasjonsarbeidere o.l. 1 0.1%

9210 Hjelpearbeidere innen jordbruk, skogbruk og fiske 0

9310 Hjelpearbeidere innen bygg, anlegg, vedlikehold o.l. 2 0.2%

9320 Hjelpearbeidere innen industri 3 0.3%

9330 Hjelpearbeidere innen lager og godshåndtering 0

9998 1 0.1%

9999 Uoppgitt 8 0.7%

Sysmiss 688Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v277: R's spouse/partner's - superior position

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1094 /-] [Invalid=688 /-]

Literal question Would you say your spouse/partner's profession/occupation is/was a superior position?

Page 352: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 352 -

# v277: R's spouse/partner's - superior position

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 373 34.1%

2 No 719 65.7%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 2 0.2%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v278: R's spouse/partner's kind of business

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1094 /-] [Invalid=688 /-]

Literal question Was this business/industry a privately owned firm, a joint-stock company, an organisation, in municipal, county or publicservice?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Privately owned firm 138 12.6%

2 Joint-stock company 467 42.7%

3 Organisation 48 4.4%

4 Local service 235 21.5%

5 County service 40 3.7%

6 Public service 159 14.5%

8 Won't answer 1 0.1%

9 Don't know 6 0.5%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v279: R. member of a union

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Are you a member of a union or a work organisation?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 877 49.2%

2 No 878 49.3%

8 Won't answer 10 0.6%

9 Don't know 17 1.0%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v280: Primary union this organisation belongs to

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-99] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=877 /-] [Invalid=905 /-]

Literal question Which primary union does this organisation belong to?

Interviewer's instructions If answered 'yes' in bak18.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 The Norwegian Confederation of Trade Unions (LO) 383 43.7%

2 The Confederation of Vocational Unions (YS) 130 14.8%

3 The Confederation of Unions for Professionals (UNIO) 127 14.5%

4 Norwegian Farmers' Union (NFU) 14 1.6%

5 Norwegian Farmers and Smallholders Union 2 0.2%

Page 353: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 353 -

# v280: Primary union this organisation belongs to

Value Label Cases Percentage

6 Norwegian Fisherman Union 3 0.3%

7 Confederation of Norwegian Enterprise (NHO) 18 2.1%

8 The Federation of Norwegian Professional Associations 95 10.8%

9 Others 86 9.8%

98 Won't answer 0

99 Don't know 19 2.2%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v281: Bak19sps Spes av hovedsammenslutn for org.

Information [Type= discrete] [Format=numeric] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=0 /-] [Invalid=1782 /-]

Literal question Specify which other primary union this organisations belongs to.

Interviewer's instructions If answered 'yes' in bak18.

Value Label Cases Percentage

Sysmiss 1782Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v282: Active member of the organisation

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=877 /-] [Invalid=905 /-]

Literal question Are you an active member of this organisation? By active member, I mean that one participates in most of the meetings.

Interviewer's instructions If answered 'yes' in bak18.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes, active 159 18.1%

2 No, not active 717 81.8%

8 Won't answer 0

9 Don't know 1 0.1%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v283: R's written form

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Which form of the Norwegian language do you prefer to use in your writing: "Bokmål" or "Nynorsk"?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Bokmål/Riksmål 1592 89.3%

2 Nynorsk/Landsmål 163 9.1%

8 Won't answer 10 0.6%

9 Don't know 17 1.0%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v284: Interested in the language issue

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question How interested are you in the language issue? Would you say you are...

Page 354: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 354 -

# v284: Interested in the language issue

Post-question The language question refers to the debate on Bokmål and Nynorsk.

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Very interested 234 13.1%

2 Somewhat interested 584 32.8%

3 Not very interested 938 52.6%

8 Won't answer 10 0.6%

9 Don't know 16 0.9%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v285: R abstainer

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Do you consider yourself a total abstainer, or do you drink alcohol now and then?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Abstainer 145 8.1%

2 Not abstainer, but with moderation 137 7.7%

3 Tastes alcohol 1474 82.7%

8 Won't answer 11 0.6%

9 Don't know 15 0.8%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v286: Interest in the abstinence issue

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question How interested are you in the abstinence issue? Would you say that you are...

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Very interested 55 3.1%

2 Somewhat interested 359 20.1%

3 Not very interested 1337 75.0%

8 Won't answer 10 0.6%

9 Don't know 21 1.2%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v287: R member of any religious organisation

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Are you a member of any religious or Christian association or organisation?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 256 14.4%

2 No 1501 84.2%

8 Won't answer 10 0.6%

9 Don't know 15 0.8%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

Page 355: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 355 -

# v288: Present at chuch services

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 0-99] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question How many times during the past month have you

... A. Been present at chuch services?

# v289: Attended other religious meetings

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 0-99] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question How many times during the past month have you

... B. Attended other religious meetings?

# v290: Listened to devotionals and church services on the radio or television

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 0-99] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question How many times during the past month have you

... C. Listened to devotionals and church services on the radio or television?

# v291: Do you consider yourself personally Christian

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 1-9] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question Do you consider yourself personally Christian?

Value Label Cases Percentage

1 Yes 514 28.8%

2 No 1100 61.7%

3 In doubt 140 7.9%

8 Won't answer 10 0.6%

9 Don't know 18 1.0%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v292: Highest completed education

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 0-99] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question What is your highest completed education?

Value Label Cases Percentage

0 No education 1 0.1%

1 Primary school 49 2.7%

2 Junior high school 201 11.3%

3 High school, vocational training 247 13.9%

4 High school, general studies 408 22.9%

5 Preparation for university 139 7.8%

6 University and university college, lower level 420 23.6%

7 University and university college, higher level 273 15.3%

8 Researcher education 18 1.0%

98 Won't answer 10 0.6%

Page 356: Statistics Norway, SSB Election Survey 2009 Norway · 2019-07-09 · Data Collection Mode Telephone interview Data Collector(s) Statistics Norway (SSB) Accessibility Distributor(s)

- 356 -

# v292: Highest completed education

Value Label Cases Percentage

99 Don't know 16 0.9%Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

# v293: Gross income 2008

Information [Type= continuous] [Format=numeric] [Range= 0-99999999] [Missing=*]

Statistics [NW/ W] [Valid=1782 /-] [Invalid=0 /-]

Literal question How much was your household's gross income in 2008? By gross income, I mean collected income before possible taxallowances or expenses, and closer to 1000 kroner.

Interviewer's instructions Have R trouble answering, ask for answers near kr 10,000. If no income, check with 0 Note: For spouses / partners, the sumof the income shall be stated. If R has no personal income, report the spouse / cohabitant's income.