state of the industry: 3d-mbd & mbe
TRANSCRIPT
State Of The Industry: 3D-MBD & MBE
State Of The Industry: 3D-MBD & MBE
Agenda:
- 3D-MBD & MBE Definition
- 3D-MBD History
- Survey Results
- Conclusion
North America Regional Headquarters: DENSO International America, Inc., Southfield MI
Companies: 30
Employees: 23,000+
Consolidated Revenue: US$9.9 billion
Operating Profit: US$423.4 million
Powertrain Control System Engine management system, Gasoline direct injection, Hybrid components, Starter, Alternator, etc.
Thermal Systems Heating Ventilation Air Conditioning (HVAC), Compressor, Heat exchangers, Battery thermal management, etc.
Information & Communications Systems Instrument cluster, Head-up display, Human machine interface technologies, Horn, Keyless entry, Wireless phone charger, etc.
Driving Control & Safety Systems Passive safety technologies, Airbag sensing system, Active safety technologies, Traction control system, Antilock braking system, etc.
Introduction: DENSO In North America
* Figures are based on IFRS. Data is accurate as of March 31, 2016 unless otherwise stated.
* U.S. dollar amounts have been translated, for convenience only, at the rate of 112.68 yen = US$1, the approximate
exchange rate prevailing on March 31, 2016. Billion is used in the American sense of one thousand million.
Automotive Products
Introduction: 3D-MBD & MBE Definition
Source: http://www.model-based-enterprise.org/model-based-definition.html
The National Institute of Standards & Technology (NIST) defines 3D-MBD in two ways:
(1) The Model Based Enterprise (MBE) is made up of many related processes.
At its core is the product definition which we refer to as the Model Based
Definition (3D-MBD).
(2) An annotated CAD model that contains all of the information needed to define
a product. This annotated model replaces the traditional drawing.
Thus, a drawing is created by exception not as a standard process.
Introduction: 3D-MBD & MBE Definition
3D Master CAD Model With 3D Annotations Fully Leveraged By The Enterprise
Model Based Enterprise
(MBE)
3D Master CAD Model With 3D Annotations 2D Drawings By Exception
Model Based Definition (3D-MBD)
Model Authority
2D Master Drawing 3D Model Not Verified Or Configuration Controlled
2D Master Drawing With Associative 3D Model 3D Model Is Verified & Configuration Controlled
Drawing Centric
Model Centric
Drawing Authority
Introduction: 3D-MBD History
Date Standard Purpose
Aug 2003 ASME Y14.41 Defines how to organize and present product definition data (ex: geometric tolerances, datums, notes, etc) in 3D model
Dec 2006 ISO 16792 Similar to ASME Y14.41, defines method to show product definition in 3D model
June 2008 SASIG D-27 Defines method to document information in 3D model required by all areas involved in product creation (ex: manufacturing, etc)
Standards Defining Requirements For Annotating 3D Models Have Existed For Over A Decade
Introduction: SASIG 3D-MBD/MBE Survey
Survey Participation:
Survey Purpose: Identify Current State of 3D-MBD Utilization
Identify Automotive Industry Readiness to Adopt 3D-MBD & MBE
Business Model
Company Size
Survey Results: Company Participation
Product Type
Number of
Employees
Company Participation Represents Cross-Section of Automotive Industry
Survey Results: Data File Format Usage
Native CAD
Light-Weight Data
Neutral Formats
96.1%
45.1%
21.6%
CAD Data Formats Utilized by Survey Participants:
Many Companies Are Utilizing Data Formats Required For 3D-MBD & MBE
Companies Familiar With 3D-MBD Concept
Companies Familiar With Automotive Direction
Survey Results: 3D-MBD Familiarity
Large Percentage of Companies Are Familiar With 3D-MBD Concept & Automotive Direction
Survey Results: 3D-MBD Current Usage
Companies Currently Utilizing 3D-MBD Key Reasons: Not Using 3D-MBD
Companies Are Familiar With Concept; However, Large Percentage Are Not Utilizing 3D-MBD
• Customer Doesn’t Require It
• Lack Downstream Consumption Systems
• Belief That It Is Not Possible/Necessary
• Have Not Conducted Investigation
• Lack Understanding of Benefit/Value
• Lack Supplier Readiness
• Lack Resources To Proceed
Parts Produced Using 3D-MBD Only 3D-MBD Can Drive Production Systems
Companies Who Currently Utilize 3D-MBD, Have Not Fully Implemented MBE
Survey Results: 3D-MBD Consumption
Convert 3D-MBD to Drawings Create Drawing If 3D-MBD Received
Companies Who Currently Utilize 3D-MBD, Still Utilize 2D Drawings
Survey Results: 3D-MBD Consumption
3D-MBD Used For Quality Inspection 3D-MBD Used For Virtual Manufacturing
Survey Results: 3D-MBD Consumption
Companies Who Currently Utilize 3D-MBD, Use It Primarily In Quality Inspection & Virtual Manufacturing
Companies Who Currently Utilize 3D-MBD, Recognize Usage Can Occur Across Enterprise
Departments Who Can Utilize 3D-MBD
Survey Results: 3D-MBD Consumption
Survey Results: Impact Of 3D-MBD
Labor Cost Reduction
Manufacturing Cost Reduction
Data Quality Improvement
Companies Who Currently Utilize 3D-MBD, Have Begun to Recognize Value, But It Is Not Fully Realized
Survey Result: Obstacles Preventing MBE
Companies Who Currently Utilize 3D-MBD, Recognize Obstacles Preventing Full MBE
Obstacles Preventing Full MBE
Survey Results: 3D-MBD Interest Level
Key Reasons: Lack Interest in 3D-MBD Companies Interested in Utilizing 3D-MBD
• Don’t Understand Concept
• Not Necessary
• Have Not Considered It
• Not Possible
• Not Likely To Use
Companies May Not Currently Utilize 3D-MBD; However, High Interest Level Exists To Utilize 3D-MBD
Conclusion
•Auto Industry Has Been Slow to Adopt 3D-MBD •Standards Have Existed For Over A Decade
•Small Percentage of Companies Utilizing 3D-MBD
•Auto Industry Seems Ready to Take 3D-MBD Direction
•High Familiarity & Interest Level in 3D-MBD
•Currently Utilize Required File Formats
•Increased Effort to Promote 3D-MBD Is Necessary •Address Key Reasons For Lack Of Adoption
• Increase Awareness of Value/Benefit