stapleton knaggs dismiss

Upload: raceradio

Post on 13-Apr-2018

232 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/26/2019 Stapleton Knaggs Dismiss

    1/21

    i

    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

    UNITED STATES ex rel.FLOYDLANDIS,

    Plaintiffs,

    v.

    TAILWIND SPORTS CORPORATION,et al.,

    Defendants.___________________________________

    )))))))))))))

    No. 10-cv-00976 (CRC)

    JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

    Relator Floyd Landis (Relator) and Defendants Capital Sports and

    Entertainment Holdings, Inc., William Stapleton and Barton Knaggs (collectively the

    CSE Defendants or Defendants) submit this Joint Stipulation of Dismissal, pursuant to

    the settlement agreement entered into on December 10, 2014 by Relator, the Law Offices

    of Paul D. Scott, P.C. (Relators Counsel), and the CSE Defendants (the Settlement

    Agreement), a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

    JOINT STIPULATION

    WHEREAS, Relator filed this qui tamaction under the federal False Claims Act

    on behalf of the United States on June 10, 2010, filed a First Amended Complaint on

    December 23, 2010, and filed a Second Amended Complaint on February 22, 2013

    (collectively the Action).

    WHEREAS the Action alleges that the CSE Defendants caused to be submitted

    and conspired to submit false claims and reverse false claims to the United States in

    connection with the United States Postal Services sponsorship of the USPS Pro Cycling

    Team, and the CSE Defendants deny all such allegations and claims.

    Case 1:10-cv-00976-CRC Document 253 Filed 12/18/14 Page 1 of 5

  • 7/26/2019 Stapleton Knaggs Dismiss

    2/21

    ii

    WHEREAS, the Government has not intervened in the Action as to the CSE

    Defendants.

    WHEREAS, Relator and the CSE Defendants negotiated in good faith and

    reached an agreement in principle resolving all of Relators claims against the CSE

    Defendants.

    WHEREAS, following their agreement in principle Relator and the CSE

    Defendants communicated the terms of the agreement to the United States Department of

    Justice.

    WHEREAS, in preparing settlement documents, Relator and the CSE Defendants

    have sought to incorporate, where possible, the standard provisions included in False

    Claims Act settlements entered into by the United States Department of Justice.

    WHEREAS, Relator and the CSE Defendants have executed the Settlement

    Agreement attached as Exhibit A, a copy of which was provided to the United States on

    December 11, 2014.

    WHEREAS, the United States Department of Justice has not stated whether or not

    it approves of the Settlement Agreement as of the date of this stipulation.

    WHEREAS, the Parties propose to provide the United States with 43 days within

    which to further review the Settlement Agreement and to approve or object to its terms.

    WHEREAS, the Settlement Agreement provides that the CSE Defendants shall

    pay the United States $500,000.00 (Five Hundred Thousand Dollars) and that Relator and

    the CSE Defendants each release certain claims against each other as set forth in the

    Settlement Agreement. SeeSettlement Agreement, Exhibit A at III (1), (5), (6).

    WHEREAS, the Settlement Agreement represents a fair and reasonable resolution

    of the claims in the Action.

    WHEREAS, 31 U.S.C. 3730(d)(2) provides that the Relator shall also receive

    an amount for reasonable expenses which the court finds to have been necessarily

    incurred, plus reasonable attorneys fees and costs.

    Case 1:10-cv-00976-CRC Document 253 Filed 12/18/14 Page 2 of 5

  • 7/26/2019 Stapleton Knaggs Dismiss

    3/21

    iii

    WHEREAS, in the more than four and a half years of this litigation, according to

    Relators counsel, they have reviewed and produced thousands of pages of documents;

    reviewed thousands of pages of documents produced by the CSE Defendants and others;

    contracted for, set up, and maintained an electronic repository for the review and coding

    of documents; engaged in extensive investigative work and legal research; responded to a

    motion to dismiss filed by the CSE Defendants; jointly with the United States drafted and

    filed a motion to strike the affirmative defenses of defendants, including the CSE

    Defendants; prepared numerous memos and briefing papers for the United States

    regarding the legal and factual matters relating to the Action; drafted and responded to

    written discovery; drafted meet and confer correspondence, engaged in meet and confer

    conferences, and prepared summary discovery motions; participated in numerous in-

    person and telephonic conferences with government personnel responsible for the Action

    and with counsel for the CSE Defendants; conferred with and advised their client and

    worked with him to respond to discovery requests; and ultimately negotiated a settlement

    of this False Claims Act litigation as it relates to the CSE Defendants.

    WHEREAS, the Settlement Agreement provides that the CSE Defendants shall

    pay Relators Counsel $100,000.00 (One Hundred Thousand Dollars) to cover a portion

    of the reasonable attorneys fees and costs incurred by Relators counsel during the more

    than four and a half years of litigation of this matter.

    WHEREAS, the Settlement Agreement expressly does not seek to release, and

    reserves, specific civil, administrative, and criminal claims of the United States. See

    Exhibit A at III (11).

    WHEREAS, the Settlement Agreement provides that the CSE Defendants may

    not seek to charge the United States or otherwise seek reimbursement from the United

    States for payments provided for in the Settlement Agreement or the costs incurred in

    investigating, litigating, and settling the Action. SeeSettlement Agreement, Exhibit A at

    III (14).

    Case 1:10-cv-00976-CRC Document 253 Filed 12/18/14 Page 3 of 5

  • 7/26/2019 Stapleton Knaggs Dismiss

    4/21

    iv

    WHEREAS, given the delay, uncertainty, inconvenience, and expense of

    protracted litigation of the Action, Relator and the CSE Defendants agree the Settlement

    Agreement is fair, adequate, and reasonable under all the circumstances.

    WHEREAS, when the Government does not intervene in a qui tamaction during

    the period provided for in 31 U.S.C. 3730(b)(b), the relator retains the right to conduct

    the action. 31 U.S.C. 3730(b)(4)(B) & 3730(c)(3).

    THEREFORE, Relator and the CSE Defendants, by and through their counsel of

    record, hereby stipulate to the following:

    1. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) and 31 U.S.C.

    3730(b), subject to the consent of the United States or subject to notice and a

    reasonable opportunity for the United States to be heard on or before January 30, 2015

    with any objections to the Settlement Agreement or dismissal, and subject to the approval

    of this Court, Relator dismisses the Second Amended Complaint against the CSE

    Defendants with prejudice as to the Relator and the United States.

    2. Upon the condition that the Settlement Agreement is approved by the

    Court, Relator and the CSE Defendants shall have no liability to each other for their costs

    and attorneys fees with respect tothe Action except as specifically provided for in the

    Settlement Agreement. Relator and his counsel retain the right to seek from the other

    defendants in the Action all expenses, legal fees and costs incurred in connection with the

    Action, which are not being paid under the Settlement Agreement.

    3. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Settlement

    Agreement and to resolve, pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3730(d), any disputes regarding

    Relators statutory share from the United States, which disputes may be raised with the

    Court by motion.

    4. This Stipulation does not dismiss any claims against any of the defendants

    in the Action with the exception of the CSE Defendants.

    IT IS SO STIPULATED.

    Case 1:10-cv-00976-CRC Document 253 Filed 12/18/14 Page 4 of 5

  • 7/26/2019 Stapleton Knaggs Dismiss

    5/21

    v

    Dated: December 18, 2014 Respectfully submitted,

    /s/ John P. Pierce___________John P. Pierce (D.C. Bar No. 475101)THEMIS PLLC2305 Calvert Street, NWWashington, DC 20008(202) 567-2050Telephone(202) [email protected]

    Marc S. Harris (pro hac vice)SCHEPER KIM & HARRIS LLP601 West Fifth Street, 12th FloorLos Angeles, CA 90071-2025(213) 613-4655Telephone(213) [email protected]

    Attorneys for Capital Sports andEntertainment Holdings, Inc., WilliamStapleton and Barton Knaggs

    __________ /s/________________Paul D. [email protected] State Bar No. 145975AdmittedPro Hac Vice

    ___________/s/________________Lani Anne [email protected] State Bar No. 189889U.S.D.C. No. PA0045Jon L. PraedU.S.D.C. No. 450764D.C. Bar No. 51665LAW OFFICES OF PAUL D.SCOTT, P.C.Pier 9, Suite 100San Francisco, California 94111Tel: (415) 981-1212Fax: (415) 981-1215

    Attorneys for Relator Floyd Landis

    Case 1:10-cv-00976-CRC Document 253 Filed 12/18/14 Page 5 of 5

  • 7/26/2019 Stapleton Knaggs Dismiss

    6/21

    Case 1:10-cv-00976-CRC Document 253-1 Filed 12/18/14 Page 1 of 16

  • 7/26/2019 Stapleton Knaggs Dismiss

    7/21

    Case 1:10-cv-00976-CRC Document 253-1 Filed 12/18/14 Page 2 of 16

  • 7/26/2019 Stapleton Knaggs Dismiss

    8/21

    Case 1:10-cv-00976-CRC Document 253-1 Filed 12/18/14 Page 3 of 16

  • 7/26/2019 Stapleton Knaggs Dismiss

    9/21

    Case 1:10-cv-00976-CRC Document 253-1 Filed 12/18/14 Page 4 of 16

  • 7/26/2019 Stapleton Knaggs Dismiss

    10/21

    Case 1:10-cv-00976-CRC Document 253-1 Filed 12/18/14 Page 5 of 16

  • 7/26/2019 Stapleton Knaggs Dismiss

    11/21

    Case 1:10-cv-00976-CRC Document 253-1 Filed 12/18/14 Page 6 of 16

  • 7/26/2019 Stapleton Knaggs Dismiss

    12/21

    Case 1:10-cv-00976-CRC Document 253-1 Filed 12/18/14 Page 7 of 16

  • 7/26/2019 Stapleton Knaggs Dismiss

    13/21

    Case 1:10-cv-00976-CRC Document 253-1 Filed 12/18/14 Page 8 of 16

  • 7/26/2019 Stapleton Knaggs Dismiss

    14/21

    Case 1:10-cv-00976-CRC Document 253-1 Filed 12/18/14 Page 9 of 16

  • 7/26/2019 Stapleton Knaggs Dismiss

    15/21

    Case 1:10-cv-00976-CRC Document 253-1 Filed 12/18/14 Page 10 of 16

  • 7/26/2019 Stapleton Knaggs Dismiss

    16/21

    Case 1:10-cv-00976-CRC Document 253-1 Filed 12/18/14 Page 11 of 16

  • 7/26/2019 Stapleton Knaggs Dismiss

    17/21

    Case 1:10-cv-00976-CRC Document 253-1 Filed 12/18/14 Page 12 of 16

  • 7/26/2019 Stapleton Knaggs Dismiss

    18/21

    Case 1:10-cv-00976-CRC Document 253-1 Filed 12/18/14 Page 13 of 16

  • 7/26/2019 Stapleton Knaggs Dismiss

    19/21

    Case 1:10-cv-00976-CRC Document 253-1 Filed 12/18/14 Page 14 of 16

  • 7/26/2019 Stapleton Knaggs Dismiss

    20/21

    Case 1:10-cv-00976-CRC Document 253-1 Filed 12/18/14 Page 15 of 16

  • 7/26/2019 Stapleton Knaggs Dismiss

    21/21

    Case 1:10-cv-00976-CRC Document 253-1 Filed 12/18/14 Page 16 of 16