standards moscow 2013 iso20022 swift

14
Adopting ISO 20022: Connecting the dots Françoise Massin, Senior Specialist, ISO 20022 Registration Authority, Standards, SWIFT SWIFT Standards Forum Moscow 2013 Moscow, 11 April 2013

Upload: swift

Post on 07-Jun-2015

171 views

Category:

Economy & Finance


5 download

DESCRIPTION

Standards Moscow 2013 Massin ISO20022

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Standards Moscow 2013 ISO20022 SWIFT

Adopting ISO 20022: Connecting the dots Françoise Massin, Senior Specialist, ISO 20022

Registration Authority, Standards, SWIFT

SWIFT Standards Forum

Moscow 2013

Moscow, 11 April 2013

Page 2: Standards Moscow 2013 ISO20022 SWIFT

ISO 20022: Connecting the dots

2

ISO 20022 Why ?

ISO 20022

Who ?

ISO 20022

How ?

ISO 20022

When ?

Page 3: Standards Moscow 2013 ISO20022 SWIFT

ISO 20022: Where is it used?

Page 4: Standards Moscow 2013 ISO20022 SWIFT

4

IPFA

Live Planned

SEPA,EU

BR

DK

CH

FED, US

CPA, CA

IPFA

T2, EU

SADC AU

Zengin,

JP

CNAPS,

CN

IN

Low-

value

High-

value

CIPS, CN

BOJNet,

JP

CPA, CA Live

Live

Live

NZ

SG

Live CO

PE

ISO 20022 Adoption – Payments MI & initiatives

From discussion to implementation

Live

PG

Page 5: Standards Moscow 2013 ISO20022 SWIFT

Status overview – Payments MI

Status Planned live date

EU-SEPA Live Live – end date

2014

SG Live

IPFA Live

JP-Zengin Live

IN - RTGS Roll-out 2013 (TBC)

SADC Roll-out 2013 (TBC)

JP-BOJNet Roll-out 2015

CH Roll-out 2015-2018

AU-LVP Roll-out 2016/2017

T2 Committed 2017

CA-all payment

systems

Roll-out 2020

CNIPS Under discussion TBD 5

Page 6: Standards Moscow 2013 ISO20022 SWIFT

DTCC, US

JASDEC, JP

[Post-trade]

Euroclear

Clearstream

ANBIMA, BR

T2S, EU

CSD, LI

CSD, PL

6

CSD, EE

CSD, LT

ASX, AU

Live

Live

ISO 20022 Adoption – Securities MI & Treasury MI –

From discussion to implementation

CLS

Treasury MI Securities MI

SGX, SG

JASDEC &

TSE, JP

[Corp.Act]

VN

Live

CN

Live

BR, CSD

Live

Page 7: Standards Moscow 2013 ISO20022 SWIFT

Status overview – Securities & Treasury MI

Status Planned live

date

FR-Euroclear / Funds Live

Clearstream/Funds Live

US- DTCC/Corporate Actions Live

BR-Anbima Live

AU- ASX-Corporate Actions Roll-out Mid-2013

JP- JASDEC – Post-Trade

Services

Roll-out 2014

JP –JASDEC + TSE –

Corp. Actions

Roll-out 2014

CLS Roll-out 2014

T2S Roll-out 2015

SG- SGX/Corporate Actions Under discussion TBD

BR – BM&FBOVESPA Committed TBD

7

Page 8: Standards Moscow 2013 ISO20022 SWIFT

ISO 20022 Adoption – Funds (live traffic Jan-Oct 2012)

8

GB

CH

AU

TW

SE

FI NO

IE

ES

IT

GR

EE

BE

NL

LU

KR US FR

DE

SG

HK

BM

Page 9: Standards Moscow 2013 ISO20022 SWIFT

ISO 20022 in the corporate-to-bank space

More than

60 banks

receiving

payment initiation

messages

(over SWIFT)

Around

70 members

(corporates and banks)

defining

common global

implementation

guidelines

Page 10: Standards Moscow 2013 ISO20022 SWIFT

Who (and what) is driving ISO 20022

adoption?

• New initiatives

– Market infrastructures

– Global harmonisation & regulation (eg SEPA in Europe)

– Automation in specific markets

(eg the ‘funds’ market)

• New players

– Corporates, fund managers

• New technology

– XML, SOA, web services

10

From early adopters to ‘followers’

Page 11: Standards Moscow 2013 ISO20022 SWIFT

When to adopt ISO 20022?

Drivers:

–Harmonization

(driven by regulation or innovation)

–Renewal of legacy systems

–Further automation required

–Creation of new services

–Interoperability with

other systems/players

11

Page 12: Standards Moscow 2013 ISO20022 SWIFT

Why adopt ISO 20022

12

An international and neutral recipe to build a

common financial language

– Meaning of business processes and information >

dictionary

– Set of messages to execute end-to-end transactions >

repository

– Right syntax: XML > universally used, tools

available to facilitate implementation

Collaboration

with external

parties

Internal

integration

Standards

inter-

operability

Page 13: Standards Moscow 2013 ISO20022 SWIFT

ISO 20022 allows for more flexibility than MT to cater for

local/specific needs

• Implementation guidelines:

formal way to express market practice

• Extensions

• Right tools and services available to manage flexibility

ISO 20022 Awareness Training Live Meeting V01 13

Why adopt ISO 20022 –

a global standard to meet local needs

MT ISO 20022

Page 14: Standards Moscow 2013 ISO20022 SWIFT

How to adopt ISO 20022

Managing diverging local implementations

14

• Is a risk – but still better - Coordination

through working

group defining HVP

implementation

guidelines

- Best practice sharing

- Tools allow to harmonize MyStandards

- Mitigate risks

A risk that can be mitigated by a coordinated

approach:

– Collaboration and best practice sharing in working

groups (eg HVP implementation guidelines)

– Services to help communities migrate and

implement (roadmap/creation of guidelines/mapping/etc)

– Tools (MyStandards) to facilitate

sharing and harmonization