st. catherine realty corp vs pineda

7/24/2019 St. Catherine Realty Corp vs Pineda

1/7

ST. CATHERINE REALTY G.R. No. 171525

CORPORATION and LAND

KING REALTY DEVELOPMENT Present:

CORPORATION,

Petitioners, CARPIO,J., Chairperson,

NACHURA,

PERALTA,

ABAD, and

- verss - !ENDO"A,JJ.

FERDINAND Y. PINEDA Pro#$%ated:

and DOLORES S. LACUATA,

Respondents. &$' (), (*+*- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

D E C I S I O N

CARPIO,J.

T!" Ca#"

Beore the Cort is a petition or revie /+0assai$in% the (1 De2e#3er (**4

De2ision/(0and +5 6e3rar' (**7 Reso$tion/)0o the Cort o Appea$s in CA-8.R.

9P No. (1*1.

T!" An$"%"d"n$ Fa%$#

On 4 !ar2h +11+, 6erdinand ;. Pineda ares ares= hi2h as part o a +1.5( he2tare propert' ?non as Lot

No. (*+( re%istered nder Transer Certii2ate o Tit$e ares ares a2@ired the#, pro#ptin% Pineda and La2ata


2/7

9an 6ernando, Pa#pan%a, Bran2h 54 ares. The RTC Bran2h 54 opined that hen the $ots ere

3ro%ht nder the Land Reor# Pro%ra#, the' 2o$d no $on%er 3e so$d and the sa$e

to respondents as n$$ and void. Respondents, as e$$ as Att'. Pineda, appea$ed

ro# the de2ision in Civi$ Case No. +*(74 3eore the Cort o Appea$s. The 2ase

as do2?eted as CA-8.R. C No. 4771. In a Reso$tion dated !ar2h (***,/70the Cort o Appea$s dis#issed the appea$. In a Reso$tion dated + !a' (***,/0the Cort o Appea$s denied the #otion or re2onsideration or $ate i$in%. A

petition or revie, do2?eted as 8.R. No. +5)51(, as i$ed 3eore this

Cort. This Cort denied the petition on (+ A%st (***/0or ai$re o petitioners

to %ive an ep$anation on h' servi2e o 2opies o the petition on respondents as

not done persona$$'. This Cort denied the #otion or re2onsideration on (4 &ne

(**+./10
http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2010/july2010/171525.htm#_ftn4http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2010/july2010/171525.htm#_ftn5http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2010/july2010/171525.htm#_ftn6http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2010/july2010/171525.htm#_ftn7http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2010/july2010/171525.htm#_ftn8http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2010/july2010/171525.htm#_ftn9http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2010/july2010/171525.htm#_ftn4http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2010/july2010/171525.htm#_ftn5http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2010/july2010/171525.htm#_ftn6http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2010/july2010/171525.htm#_ftn7http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2010/july2010/171525.htm#_ftn8http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2010/july2010/171525.htm#_ftn9


3/7

!eanhi$e, Li>ares i$ed a petition or revie ro# the DARABs de2ision

3eore the Cort o Appea$s. The 2ase as do2?eted as CA-8.R. 9P

No. 54*(. On (1 Nove#3er (***,/+*0the Cort o Appea$s dis#issed the petition

and air#ed the DARABs de2ision. On (7 &ne (**+,/++0the Cort o Appea$s

denied the #otion or re2onsideration. Li>ares, representin% the estate o

En2arna2ion, i$e a petition or revie/+(03eore this Cort, do2?eted as 8.R. No.

+5. The 2ase as sti$$ pendin% pon the i$in% o CA-8.R. 9P No. (1*1.

The 2ase 3eore s ori%inated ro# Civi$ Case No. +(+15 i$ed on &anar'

(**+ 3' respondents 3eore the Re%iona$ Tria$ Cort o 9an 6ernando, Pa#pan%a,

Bran2h 55


4/7


5/7

adds to the a$read' 2on%ested 2ort do2?ets. /+10 Its re@isites are: ares a%ainst the e#an2ipation

tenants. The Cort o Appea$s noted that Li>ares a$read' so$d portions o the estate

to respondents three 'ears 3eore he i$ed the DARAB 2ases. Respondents ere

not even parties in the DARAB 2ases.

Hoever, e a%ree ith petitioners that there as or# shoppin% hen

Civi$ Case No. +(+15 as i$ed.

Contrar' to the indin%s o the Cort o Appea$s, Civi$ Case No.

+*(74 as not dis2ssed in the 2o#p$aint in Civi$ Case No. +(+15. The 2o#p$aint

in Civi$ Case No. +(+15 #ere$' stated:

(.4 Drin% the penden2' o Civi$ Case No. +*(74, the $ot 2overed 3'

TCT No. )4)) as s3divided and transerred to s3se@ent 3'ers. In

prsan2e o the $a, theLis Pendensas 2arried over to the s3se@ent

tit$es, parti2$ar$':


6/7


7/7

HEREFORE, e GRANTthe petition. Ge SET ASIDEthe (1

De2e#3er (**4 De2ision and +5 6e3rar' (**7 Reso$tion o the Cort o

Appea$s in CA-8.R. 9P No. (1*1, the Order dated (* &anar' (**5 o the

Re%iona$ Tria$ Cort o 9an 6ernando, Pa#pan%a, Bran2h 5 and the Order dated

)+ &$' (**( o the Re%iona$ Tria$ Cort o 9an 6ernando, Pa#pan%a, Bran2h

55. Ge REINSTATE the Order dated (1 A%st (**+ o the Re%iona$ Tria$

Cort o 9an 6ernando, Pa#pan%a, Bran2h 55 hi2h dis#issed the 2o#p$aint.

SO ORDERED.

st. catherine realty corp vs pineda

Documents