spring 2010 njask testing report

21
Spring 2010 NJASK Testing Report Bedminster Township Bedminster Township School School Presented by: Presented by: Christine Landwehrle and Christine Christine Landwehrle and Christine McCann McCann

Upload: stephanie-snider

Post on 02-Jan-2016

31 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Spring 2010 NJASK Testing Report. Bedminster Township School Presented by: Christine Landwehrle and Christine McCann. New Jersey Proficiency Levels for Grades 3-8 NJASK. Student scores for NJASK are reported as scaled scores Scaled scores range from 100-300 with 300 being a “perfect” score - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Spring 2010 NJASK Testing Report

Spring 2010NJASK Testing Report

Bedminster Township SchoolBedminster Township School

Presented by:Presented by:Christine Landwehrle and Christine McCannChristine Landwehrle and Christine McCann

Page 2: Spring 2010 NJASK Testing Report

New Jersey Proficiency Levels for Grades 3-8 NJASK

Student scores for NJASK are reported as Student scores for NJASK are reported as scaled scoresscaled scores

Scaled scores range from 100-300 with 300 Scaled scores range from 100-300 with 300 being a “perfect” scorebeing a “perfect” score Partially ProficientPartially Proficient 100-199100-199 ProficientProficient 200-249200-249 Advanced ProficientAdvanced Proficient 250-300250-300

Page 3: Spring 2010 NJASK Testing Report

Language Arts Literacy (LAL)

The Language Arts Literacy section of each test The Language Arts Literacy section of each test measures students’ achievement in reading, measures students’ achievement in reading, writing, and viewing appropriate to their writing, and viewing appropriate to their respective grade levelrespective grade level

Students read passages selected from Students read passages selected from published books, newspapers and magazines, published books, newspapers and magazines, as well as everyday textas well as everyday text

Students then respond to related multiple-Students then respond to related multiple-choice, open-ended, and essay questionschoice, open-ended, and essay questions

Page 4: Spring 2010 NJASK Testing Report

Mathematics

The mathematics section of each test measures The mathematics section of each test measures students’ ability to solve problems by applying students’ ability to solve problems by applying mathematical concepts appropriate to their mathematical concepts appropriate to their respective grade levelrespective grade level

Students do this in response to multiple choice, Students do this in response to multiple choice, grid response, and open-ended questionsgrid response, and open-ended questions

Page 5: Spring 2010 NJASK Testing Report

Science

The Science assessment measures knowledge and The Science assessment measures knowledge and skills in three content clusters for grades 4 and 8 skills in three content clusters for grades 4 and 8 appropriate to their respective grade levelappropriate to their respective grade level

Life ScienceLife Science Physical SciencePhysical Science Earth ScienceEarth Science

Scores are reported in scaled scores ranging from 100-Scores are reported in scaled scores ranging from 100-300, with advanced proficient, proficient and partially 300, with advanced proficient, proficient and partially proficient scores, the same as the LAL and Math proficient scores, the same as the LAL and Math assessmentsassessments

Page 6: Spring 2010 NJASK Testing Report

NJASK 3 Baseline Comparison

Grade 3 LAL(2010)

n Partially Proficient

Proficient Advanced Proficient

Mean

All Students 67 40.3% 56.7% 3% 202.2

General Education 54 27.8% 68.5% 3.7% 209.5

Special Education 11 90.9% 9.1% 0% 168.3

Limited English 6 100% 0% 0% 172

Language Arts Literacy

Grade 3 Math(2010)

n Partially Proficient

Proficient Advanced Proficient

Mean

All Students 67 28.4% 34.3% 37.3% 227

General Education 54 18.5% 35.2% 46.3% 237.6

Special Education 11 72.7% 27.3% 0% 180.3

Limited English 6 83.3% 16.7% 0% 173

Math

Page 7: Spring 2010 NJASK Testing Report

NJASK Grade 4Language Arts Literacy-Longitudinal Comparison

Grade 4 LAL(2010)

n Partially Proficient

Proficient Advanced Proficient

Mean

All Students 62 19.4% 77.4% 3.2% 210.8

General Education 51 11.8% 84.3% 3.9% 215.3

Special Education 10 60% 40% 0% 188.5

Limited English 4 25% 75% 0% 199.8

Grade 3 LAL(2009)

n Partially Proficient

Proficient Advanced Proficient

Mean

All Students 68 13.8% 81.5% 4.6% 215.4

General Education 55 7.3% 87.3% 5.5% 218.8

Special Education 10 50% 50% 0% 197.1

Limited English 5 25% 75% 0% 210.8

Page 8: Spring 2010 NJASK Testing Report

NJASK Grade 4 Mathematics-Longitudinal Comparison

Grade 4 Math(2010)

n Partially Proficient

Proficient Advanced Proficient

Mean

All Students 62 12.9% 32.3% 54.8% 248.6

General Education 51 5.9% 29.4% 64.7% 257.9

Special Education 10 50% 40% 10% 205.7

Limited English 4 50% 25% 25% 214

Grade 3 Math(2009)

n Partially Proficient

Proficient Advanced Proficient

Mean

All Students 66 9.1% 54.5% 36.4% 237

General Education 55 1.8% 58.2% 40% 242

Special Education 8 50% 37.5% 12.5% 210

Limited English 5 20% 40% 40% 223

Page 9: Spring 2010 NJASK Testing Report

NJASK Grade 5 Language Arts Literacy-Longitudinal Comparison

Grade 5 LAL(2010)

n Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced Proficient

Mean

All Students 64 29.7% 64.1% 6.3% 211.7

General Education 53 22.6% 69.8% 7.5% 216.3

Special Education 10 70% 30% 0 188.4

Limited English 1 0% 100% 0 204

Grade 4 LAL(2009)

n Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced Proficient

Mean

All Students 63 23.8% 73.0% 3.2% 214.1

General Education 54 16.7% 79.6% 3.7% 219.7

Special Education 8 62.5% 37.5% 0% 181.5

Limited English 4 75% 25% 0% 190.8

Grade 3 LAL(2008)

n Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced Proficient

Mean

All Students 64 9.5% 82.5% 7.9% 224.9

General Education 56 3.6% 87.5% 8.9% 227.7

Special Education 7 57.1% 42.9% 0% 202.6

Limited English 4 33.3% 66.7% 0% 211

Page 10: Spring 2010 NJASK Testing Report

NJASK Grade 5 Mathematics-Longitudinal Comparison

Grade 5 Math(2010)

n Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced Proficient

Mean

All Students 65 7.7% 40% 52.3% 247

General Education 53 0% 41.5% 58.5% 255.2

Special Education 10 50% 30% 20% 203.2

Limited English 2 0% 50% 50% 251.5

Grade 4 Math(2009)

n Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced Proficient

Mean

All Students 63 7.9% 49.2% 42.9% 241.2

General Education 54 1.9% 50% 48.1% 247.2

Special Education 8 50% 37.5% 12.5% 206

Limited English 4 0% 50% 50% 235.3

Grade 3 Math(2008)

n Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced Proficient

Mean

All Students 63 7.9% 49.2% 42.9% 241.2

General Education 54 1.9% 50% 48.1% 247.2

Special Education 8 50% 37.5% 12.5% 206

Limited English 4 0% 50% 50% 235.3

Page 11: Spring 2010 NJASK Testing Report

NJASK Grade 6Language Arts Literacy-Longitudinal Comparison

Grade 6 LAL(2010)

n Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced Proficient

Mean

All Students 63 17.5% 74.6% 7.9% 217.6

General Education 56 8.9% 82.1% 8.9% 223.1

Special Education 7 85.7% 14.3% 0% 173

Limited English 1 0 100% 0% 209

Grade 5 LAL(2009)

n Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced Proficient

Mean

All Students 68 16.2% 70.6% 13.2% 219.9

General Education 57 10.5% 73.7% 15.8% 224.2

Special Education 10 40% 60% 0% 198.2

Limited English 3 66.7% 33.3% 0% 194

Grade 4 LAL(2008)

n Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced Proficient

Mean

All Students 71 5.6% 87.3% 7.0% 225.7

General Education 62 3.2% 88.7% 8.1% 228.8

Special Education 8 12.5% 87.5% 0% 209

Limited English 3 33.3% 66.7% 0% 203

Page 12: Spring 2010 NJASK Testing Report

NJASK Grade 6 Mathematics-Longitudinal Comparison

Grade 6 Math(2010)

n Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced Proficient

Mean

All Students 63 9.5% 47.6% 42.9% 237.9

General Education 56 1.8% 50% 48.2% 245.2

Special Education 7 71.4% 28.6% 0% 179.3

Limited English 1 0% 0% 100% 267

Grade 5 Math(2009)

n Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced Proficient

Mean

All Students 68 7.4% 41.2% 51.5% 245.2

General Education 57 3.5% 36.8% 59.6% 251.7

Special Education 10 30% 70% 0% 207.3

Limited English 3 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 226.3

Grade 4 Math(2008)

n Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced Proficient

Mean

All Students 71 4.2% 35.2% 60.6% 251.2

General Education 62 1.6% 33.9% 64.5% 254.7

Special Education 8 25% 37.5% 37.5% 225.4

Limited English 3 0% 100% 0% 236

Page 13: Spring 2010 NJASK Testing Report

NJASK Grade 7Language Arts Literacy-Longitudinal Comparison

Grade 7 LAL(2010)

N Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced Proficient

Mean

All Students 79 6.3% 48.1% 45.6% 241.6

General Education 68 0% 48.5% 51.5% 248

Special Education 11 45.5% 45.5% 9.1% 202.2

Limited English 0 0% 0% 0% 0

Grade 6 LAL(2009)

n Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced Proficient

Mean

All Students 73 11.0% 69.9% 19.2% 225.9

General Education 62 4.8% 72.6% 22.6% 231.2

Special Education 11 45.5% 54.5% 0% 196.4

Limited English 2 0% 100% 0% 221.5

Grade 5 LAL(2008)

n Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced Proficient

Mean

All Students 72 16.7% 73.6% 9.7% 220.9

General Education 60 10% 80% 10% 224.9

Special Education 12 50% 41.7% 8.3% 200.7

Limited English 2 50% 50% 0% 212.5

Page 14: Spring 2010 NJASK Testing Report

NJASK Grade 7 Mathematics-Longitudinal Comparison

Grade 7 Math(2010)

n Partially Proficient

Proficient Advanced Proficient

Mean

All Students 79 12.7% 43% 44.3% 239.2

General Education 68 2.9% 45.6% 51.5% 248.5

Special Education 11 72.7% 27.3% 0% 181.7

Limited English 0 0% 0% 0% 0

Grade 6 Math(2009)

n Partially Proficient

Proficient Advanced Proficient

Mean

All Students 73 6.8% 46.6% 46.6% 243.5

General Education 62 0% 45.2% 54.8% 251.8

Special Education 11 45.5% 54.5% 0% 197

Limited English 2 0% 50% 50% 232.5

Grade 5 Math(2008)

n Partially Proficient

Proficient Advanced Proficient

Mean

All Students 72 8.3% 41.7% 50% 248

General Education 60 3.3% 36.7% 60% 256.3

Special Education 12 33.3% 66.7% 0% 207

Limited English 2 0% 50% 50% 236

Page 15: Spring 2010 NJASK Testing Report

NJASK Grade 8Language Arts Literacy-Longitudinal Comparison

Grade 8 LAL(2010)

n Partially Proficient

Proficient Advanced Proficient

Mean

All Students 60 6.7% 58.3% 35% 235.2

General Education 48 0% 58.3% 41.7% 241.8

Special Education 10 20% 70% 10% 214.9

Limited English 2 100% 0% 0% 178

Grade 7 LAL(2009)

n Partially Proficient

Proficient Advanced Proficient

Mean

All Students 63 4.8% 52.4% 42.9% 239

General Education 51 0% 47.1% 52.9% 248.4

Special Education 11 18.2% 81.8% 0% 204.5

Limited English 1 100% 0% 0% 139

Grade 6 LAL(2008)

n Partially Proficient

Proficient Advanced Proficient

Mean

All Students 60 22% 69.5% 8.5% 218.8

General Education 47 12.8% 76.6% 10.6% 223.5

Special Education 12 58.3% 41.7% 0% 200.2

Limited English 0 0% 0% 0% ----

Page 16: Spring 2010 NJASK Testing Report

NJASK Grade 8 Mathematics-Longitudinal Comparison

Grade 8 Math(2010)

n Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced Proficient Mean

All Students 60 28.3% 36.7% 35% 229.6

General Education 48 18.8% 37.5% 43.8% 240.2

Special Education 10 60% 40% 0% 192.3

Limited English 2 100% 0% 0% 162.5

Grade 7 Math(2009)

n Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced Proficient Mean

All Students 63 19% 46% 34.9% 235

General Education 51 7.8% 49% 43.1% 246.1

Special Education 11 63.6% 36.4% 0% 189.7

Limited English 1 100% 0% 0% 164

Grade 6 Math(2008)

n Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced Proficient Mean

All Students 60 16.7% 48.3% 35% 231.7

General Education 47 6.4% 48.9% 44.7% 242.6

Special Education 12 50% 50% 0% 195.8

Limited English 1 100% 0% 0% 149

Page 17: Spring 2010 NJASK Testing Report

NJASK Grade 8 Science

Grade 8 Science(2010)

n Partially Proficient

Proficient Advanced Proficient

Mean

All Students 60 13.3% 56.7% 30% 230.2

General Education

48 10.4% 52.1% 37.5% 237.1

Special Education

10 10% 90% 0% 205.5

Limited English 2 100% 0% 0% 187

Page 18: Spring 2010 NJASK Testing Report

2010 Language Arts LiteracyProficiency Comparisons

Test n proficient/total 2009

% proficient 2009

n proficient/total 2010

% proficient 2010

Gr. 3 56/65 86% 40/67 60%

Gr. 4 48/63 76% 50/62 81%

Gr. 5 57/68 84% 45/64 70%

Gr. 6 65/73 89% 52/63 82%

Gr. 7 60/63 95% 74/79 93%

Gr. 8 63/64 99% 56/60 93%

TOTAL 349/396 88% 317/395 80%

Page 19: Spring 2010 NJASK Testing Report

2010 Mathematics Proficiency Comparisons

Test n proficient/total 2009

% proficient 2009

n proficient/total 2010

% proficient 2010

Gr. 3 60/66 91% 48/67 72%

Gr. 4 58/63 92% 54/62 87%

Gr. 5 63/68 93% 60/65 92%

Gr. 6 68/73 93% 57/63 90%

Gr. 7 51/63 81% 69/79 87%

Gr. 8 55/64 86% 43/60 72%

TOTAL 355/397 89% 331/396 84%

Page 20: Spring 2010 NJASK Testing Report

Highlights

Bedminster students consistently perform well on all sections of the state test each year.

In many areas and grade levels, Bedminster students out-perform students in the same District Factor Group.

In almost all areas and grade levels, Bedminster students out-perform the state mean.

Page 21: Spring 2010 NJASK Testing Report

Highlights

One hundred percent of our fifth grade general education students were proficient or advanced proficient on the Math section with our mean in the advanced proficient range.

One hundred percent of our seventh grade general education students were proficient or advanced proficient on the LAL section.

One hundred perfect of our eighth grade general education students were proficient or advanced proficient on the LAL section.