sponge accounting

52
P R E S E N T E D B Y: Sponge ACCOUNTing Getting to 0 in ’10! Lisa Gentile Dorinda Roberts February 11, 2009

Upload: guest7ecccc

Post on 16-Apr-2017

5.369 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Sponge Accounting

P R E S E N T E D B Y:

Sponge ACCOUNTingGetting to 0 in ’10!

Lisa Gentile Dorinda Roberts

February 11, 2009

Page 2: Sponge Accounting

2

BACKGROUND:

Surgeons and operating room teams rely upon the practice of sponge, sharp and instrument counts as a means to eliminate retained surgical instruments.

Page 3: Sponge Accounting

3

BACKGROUND:

Counts are also a method of infection control and inventory control, and a means to prevent injury from contaminated sharps and instruments.

Page 4: Sponge Accounting

4

The PROBLEM:

The process by which counts are performed is not standardized and is often modified according to the individual hospital policy.

Even when present, counts are frequently omitted or abbreviated in emergency or transvaginal surgeries, or for vaginal deliveries.

Page 5: Sponge Accounting

5

RETAINED SPONGES:

• In cases with retained sponges, sponge counts had been falsely correct in 76% of non-vaginal surgeries; in 10% of these cases no sponge count had been performed at all.

Page 6: Sponge Accounting

6

RETAINED SPONGES:

• Falsely correct sponge counts were attributed to team fatigue, difficult operations, sponges "sticking together," or a poor counting system.

• Incorrect sponge counts that were accepted prior to closure resulted from either surgeons' dismissing the incorrect count without re-exploring the wound, or nursing staff allowing an incorrect count to be accepted.

Page 7: Sponge Accounting

7

Retained Surgical Sponges

Retained surgical sponges result from faulty Operating Room practices.

Page 8: Sponge Accounting

8

IMPLEMENTING CHANGE:

• The existing system of sponge and instrument counts probably works well, but we have no evidence to describe its actual failure rate.

• The little existing evidence suggests that it fails due to human-related factors (i.e., the count not performed, or is ignored, and that ancillary methods such as x-rays are also weak).

Page 9: Sponge Accounting

9

Retained Sponges

Sponges:• Most common retained surgical item.

• Detection can be difficult.

Surgical Sponge

Page 10: Sponge Accounting

10

CHW History and Goal

FY2008 FY2009FY2006 FY2010FY2007

Small changes in our practice

SPONGE

ACCOUNTING

17 0?1615

Number of Retained Sponges

Goal!

Page 11: Sponge Accounting

11

CHMC’s CURRENT PRACTICE

• The responsibility for preventing retained sponges has relied on the practice of “counting.”

• At the end of the case we ask “What is the count?”

• Error rates with counting are approximately 10-15%

• In 80% of retained sponge cases the count has been falsely called “correct”.

Page 12: Sponge Accounting

12

PROBLEM WITH OUR CURRENT PRACTICE:

Having your entire system rely on only one faulty element is not a very safe system

Page 13: Sponge Accounting

13

ALTERNATIVE APPROACH

• Now we need to ask a different question:“WHERE ARE THE SPONGES?”

• Change the focus away from counting and towards a system that requires accounting and visible confirmation for verification.

Page 14: Sponge Accounting

14

PLAN TO PREVENT RETAINED ITEMS:

• Establish a systematic process.

• Every case should have a sponge count performed.

All wounds are at risk--- vaginal deliveries too

• Retained sponges occur with low sponge count cases (≤20 sponges).

Page 15: Sponge Accounting

15

SPONGE ACCOUNTing ROLES IDENTIFIED:

• Nurses will use a standardized process to put all sponges in hanging sponge holders and document the sponge counts on a white board in each Operating Room.

• Surgeons will perform a methodical wound exam before closing in every case and verify with the nurses before leaving the Operating Room that all the sponges are in the holders.

Page 16: Sponge Accounting

16

APPROPRIATE COMMUNICATION:

It’s what is right not who is right– Between nurses and surgeons

• “We’re missing a sponge.” “Lets re-explore the wound!”• “I am going to place the used and unused sponges in

the holders now so we can do a Final Count.”

– Between nurses• “Separate each raytex so we can make sure we don’t miss one!”• “Let’s verify the sponge holders before we complete Change of

Shift Sign-Off.”

– Between surgeons• “Make sure you check behind the uterus for that raytex I stuck

there before you close.”• “Let’s do our wound exam and look for sponges before we close.”

Page 17: Sponge Accounting

17

Legal Recap

Preventing retained sponges is a joint and shared responsibility!

Page 18: Sponge Accounting

18

Sponge ACCOUNTing

New items to help implement the change...

Page 19: Sponge Accounting

19

NEW Plastic Hanging Sponge Holders

• The Hanging Sponge Holders are now blue-backed to assist in visualization of the sponges (compared to the previous clear-backed holders).

Page 20: Sponge Accounting

20

NEW Plastic Hanging Sponge Holders (continued):

• Each contain 5 pouches. Each pouch has a thin center-divider which separates each pouch into 2 pockets. One sponge will be placed in each pocket. Each holder can accommodate 10 sponges.

• The sponge holders are held on racks mounted to IV poles. Each rack can usually accommodate 10 sponge holders (5 on each side) which is 100 sponges!

Page 21: Sponge Accounting

21

NEW Clear Plastic Lined Kick Buckets:

• To aid in the visualization of bloody sponges in the procedure, the plastic bags lining the kick buckets will now be changed from red to clear plastic.

Page 22: Sponge Accounting

22

NEW Dry-Erase Boards in the ORs

• New dry erase boards have been created to help standardize the process in our Operating Rooms.

Page 23: Sponge Accounting

23

Sponge Holders In Practice:

Guidelines:• Use sponge holders for laps and raytex

on all cases that require a sponge count. • Use a separate holder for each sponge

type (i.e. one holder for laps & separate holder for raytex).

• Used sponges coming from the operative field should be placed into the CLEAR plastic bag-lined receptacle (i.e. kick buckets).

Page 24: Sponge Accounting

24

Process for Loading the Sponge Holders:

• Each used sponge will be taken from the kick bucket receptacle and placed in a pocket on the Sponge Holder.

• The folded sponge will be placed in the pocket with the blue tag or blue stripe visible.

• This is what differentiates a sponge with a radiographic marker from a dressing sponge.

Page 25: Sponge Accounting

25

Process for Loading the Sponge Holders (continued):

• The first sponge will be placed in the LAST pocket in the bottom of the holder. The Holder will be loaded horizontally from the bottom row to the top row, filling first the bottom two pockets and continuing upwards. This process (going from the bottom to the top) will make visual determination of the filled holder easier to see from the OR table.

Page 26: Sponge Accounting

26

Process for Loading the Sponge Holders (continued):

• Periodically throughout the case the used sponges will be placed in the holder.

Page 27: Sponge Accounting

27

The NEW Dry-Erase Boards In Practice:

New Guidelines:

• Now it is a ‘running total’

• Recorded as: 10102010301040• Always in factors of 10 (sponge packs can

only be added in groups of ten now).

• Standardized system for all ORs (L&D and Main OR will be practicing this way).

Page 28: Sponge Accounting

28

The NEW Dry-Erase Boards In Practice (continued):

• When adding a set of ten laps, the new set is added by setting the ten quantity set above the current total.

Page 29: Sponge Accounting

29

Wound Review: Checks and Balances

The Methodical Wound Exam

Page 30: Sponge Accounting

30

Methodical Wound Exploration

• A methodical exploration of the operative wound must be conducted prior to closure in every operation.

• The space to be closed must be carefully examined. Special focus should be given to closure of a cavity within a cavity (i.e., heart, major vessel, stomach, bladder, uterus, and vagina).

• Surgeons should strive to see and touch during the exploration whenever possible; reliance on only one element of sensory perception is insufficient.

Page 31: Sponge Accounting

31

MWE Recap

• The surgeon should visually and manually make every effort to assure that no unintended surgical items have been left in body cavities.

• The general process is to look and feel in the recesses of the wound and examine under fatty protuberances and soft-tissue appendages.

Page 32: Sponge Accounting

32

Steps Behind the Methodical Wound Exam:

Unless clinically contraindicated for a specific patient, a systematic approach

should be used for procedures performed in the abdomen or pelvis.

Page 33: Sponge Accounting

33

Steps Before Removing the Retractors:

These steps should be performed before removing stationary or table

mounted retractors.

Page 34: Sponge Accounting

34

Steps Before Removing the Retractors:

Examine all four quadrants of the abdomen with attention to: • Lifting the transverse colon • Checking above/around the liver and above/around the spleen

• Examining within and between loops of bowel

• Inspecting anywhere a retractor or retractor blades were placed

Page 35: Sponge Accounting

35

Steps Before Removing the Retractors:

Examine the pelvis • Look behind the bladder, uterus,

and around the upper rectum.

Page 36: Sponge Accounting

36

Steps Before Removing the Retractors:

• The vagina should be examined if it was entered or explored as part of the procedure.

Page 37: Sponge Accounting

37

Three Phases for Timing the Counts:

There will be three standard times to count in our procedures now:

• IN Count

• Closing Count

• Final Count

1010201030

Page 38: Sponge Accounting

38

Three Phases for Timing the Counts:

IN COUNT • Documentation on the Dry-Erase board

of the initial count of opened items• Only X-Ray detectable sponges or

towels can be used.

(Between the Surgical tech and the Circulating Nurse).

Page 39: Sponge Accounting

39

Three Phases for Timing the Counts:

CLOSING COUNT • “Pause for the Gauze” • The surgeon performs a Methodical Wound

Exam while the circulating nurse performs the Closing Count Call Out “I think all the sponges are out.”

• Then the surgeon can ask for the closing suture. (Exchange of information between the surgeon and the nurse).

Page 40: Sponge Accounting

40

Three Phases for Timing the Counts:

FINAL COUNT • This is the ‘Verification step’• The surgeon says “Show Me”

and looks at all of the Sponge Holders. • Then the surgeon should dictate in the

Post-Op Report “a MWE was performed and all items are ACCOUNTed for.”

(Exchange of information between the surgeon and the nurse).

Page 41: Sponge Accounting

41

In the Event of a Sponge Miscount:

• If the surgeon is informed of a missing object by the circulating nurse, while the OR staff are looking for the surgical item, the surgeon should stop closing the wound and repeat the methodical wound examination.

Page 42: Sponge Accounting

42

In the Event of a MISCOUNT:

• On occasion, an incorrect count is obtained and under these circumstances an intra-operative X-Ray is required.

• A written request for a “STAT image for foreign body detection” will be generated by the circulating nurse under the name of the attending surgeon listed in the operation record as being responsible for the conduct of the operation.

Page 43: Sponge Accounting

43

In the Event of a MISCOUNT (continued):

• Upon receiving the request, a radiology tech will take an X-Ray of the appropriate site. The elapsed time should never exceed twenty minutes. The tech will note time request received and time X-ray taken on the request slip.

• The tech taking the X-Ray will call ahead to alert the radiologist on duty that a wet read is needed from L&D OR.

Page 44: Sponge Accounting

44

In the Event of a MISCOUNT (continued):

• The radiologist on duty will review the film or the digital images of the X-Ray and will call the specified OR with the results of their examination or with a request for additional views to be obtained.

• The elapsed time should never be greater than twenty minutes.

Page 45: Sponge Accounting

45

Vaginal Delivery Considerations:

• The Sponge ACCOUNTing process will also be carried over to our Vaginal deliveries.

• The vagina is the ‘open’ wound for vaginal deliveries.

Page 46: Sponge Accounting

46

Vaginal Delivery Considerations (continued):

Some small changes:

• Now there will be only ten Raytec provided with a Vaginal Delivery table.

• There will be a small Dry-Erase board in each Delivery Suite for the nurse to record the Sponge count.

• There will be a clear plastic lined kick bucket in each Delivery Suite.

Page 47: Sponge Accounting

47

Vaginal Delivery Considerations (continued):

There will be three counts verified throughout the delivery:

• IN Count

• Closing Count

• Final Count

Labor & Delivery LDR Sponge ACCOUNTingRoom #: Date: Visualized/

Verified?Patient Initials:

Sponges Quantity In Count

Closing Count

Final Count

Raytec

Lap Sponge

Needles

Page 48: Sponge Accounting

48

Vaginal Delivery Sponge ACCOUNTing Process:

IN COUNT • Documentation on the Dry-Erase board of

the initial count of Raytec (ten included in pack will be the standard).

• If manufacturer error found, then the package should be discarded.

(Performed by the Delivery Nurse).

Page 49: Sponge Accounting

49

Vaginal Delivery Sponge ACCOUNTing Process:

CLOSING COUNT • “Pause for the Gauze” • The Delivery Provider performs a

Methodical Wound Exam of the vagina to search for any remaining sponges.

• This will be performed after the delivery of the placenta. Once the count is verified, the Provider can continue with any laceration/ipis repair.(Exchange of information between the Provider and the nurse).

Page 50: Sponge Accounting

50

Vaginal Delivery Sponge ACCOUNTing Process:

FINAL COUNT • This is the ‘Verification step’• The Delivery provider says “Show

Me” and looks at the Sponge Holder.

• Then in the Delivery Record, the nurse will document that the ‘Provider and RN verified the count.’ The Delivery note by the Provider should reflect that a MWE was performed.

(Exchange of information between the Delivery Provider and the nurse).

Page 51: Sponge Accounting

51

HOW DO YOU MEASURE SUCCESS?

• Systematic implementation

• Patient centered care - every case, every patient, every time

• Working together for the patient’s best interest

• Goal is ZERO retained sponges in ‘10!

Page 52: Sponge Accounting

52

Zero Retained Sponges in 2010!

The End!