special awards judging orientation
DESCRIPTION
Special Awards Judging Orientation. Special Awards. Awarded to the best project in each of the Special Awards. Judging Process 1. Chair leads the team through the process Chairs the discussion. Three judges per team Chair participates in the Special Award judging. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Special Awards Judging Orientation
2
Special Award Junior Intermediate SeniorExcellence in Astronomy Canadian Acoustical Association Award Canadian Society for Clinical Chemists Canadian Society for Medical Laboratory Science Award
CAP Physics Prize Carlson Wagonlit Award CSSE Engineering Innovation Award
Special Awards
Awarded to the best project in each of the Special Awards
3
Judging Process 1
• Three judges per team• Chair participates in the Special Award judging.• List of highest ranked projects will be provided by the
Chief Judge Operations at about 2:15 pm• Judges have 8 minutes to interview the student, and 2
minutes to record their impressions.• Judges work alone.• Do not interrupt Interdisciplinary Award judging which is
scheduled. You are free to listen in.
Chair leads the team through the processChairs the discussion
4
Judging Process 2
• Keep to time!• Meet as a team to decide your final results by
consensus.• Ensure all team members get a voice• Give final results to the Chief Judge Operations.• Put all the paperwork into the box on the table of the
Chief Judge Operations• Participate in Celebration Judging
5
TimetableFrom (pm)
To(pm)
Event
2:15 2:30 Meet at your Special Award Judging Table.Receive the top ranked projects from the morning’s judging from the Chief Judge Operations.Fill in top three projects to interview on your Judging Form
2:30 3:30 Interview your projects for 10 minutes 3:30 4:00 Meet at your table. Decide on final ranking by consensus.4:00 Report Final Results to Chief Judge Operations. Please
complete your Celebration Judging.
6
Judging Form
Project Number Meets Criteria Yes No RankComment
Project Number Meets Criteria Yes No RankComment
Project Number Meets Criteria Yes No RankComment
4 more projects
010305 3
010309 2
010320 1
Individual Judge Canadian Association of Physics Award
7
WorksheetTeam Consensus
Enter the Ranking (e.g. 1-3) of each project by each judge on your team. Through reasoned discussion, determine a consensus rank for each project highest (1) to lowest (3)
Project Number
Judge’s Name 010305 010309 010320
Henry Higgins
Ian Ibsen
Janet James
Total
Consensus Rank
1 3 22 3 1
2 1 3
2 3 1
5 7 6
8
Final ResultCanadian Association of Physics Prize
Project # Name(s) Project Title
1
Alt010320
010305
Ireland Liquid Solar Cells
Jones Wind Turbines – Friend or Foe?
9
Celebration JudgingGive Feedback
• Visit the one or two projects you were assigned at the end of the Morning Judging, and give them you feedback.
10
Questions
?
11
Thank Youfor your contribution to the Canada Wide
Science Fair