Certified Mqil# 70L0 0290 0001 8242 6640; Certified Mail# 70L0 0290 0001 82426657Certified Moil# 7010 0290 0001 8242 7586

AFFIDAVIT OF I REFUTE YOUR PRESUMPTION OF BEING A CORPORATE EMPLOYE,E,EQUITY LTNDER THE LAW IS PARAMOLINT

This ACTUAL CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE is hereby entered into the Commercial Chamber of this Court to wit:

ooThe renunciations not being given a result of free and intelligent choice. but rather because ofmental fear" intimidation and coercion" they were held void and of no effect." lTarnava Kawafrila v.

United States. 190 F. 2d. 506 (1951t1

A presumption is an assumption of fact that the law requires to be made from another fact or group of

facts found or otherwise established in the action. A presumption is not evidence. A presumption is

either conclusive or rebuttable. Every rebuttable presumption is either (a) a presumption affectingthe

burden of producing evidence or (b) a presumption qffecting the burden of proof. Calif.Evid.Code,

s600.

6'Citizenship is a political tie; allegiance is a territorial tenure [...] The doctrine is" that allegiance

cannot be due to two sovereignsl and taking an oath of allegiance to a new. is the strongest evidence

of withdrawins allegiance from a previous. sovereisn ..." lTqlbpry,Jgutpn, 3 U.S. 133 (1785)l

55A controversv is noniusticiable - i.e. involves a political question - where there is a textuallYdemonstrable constitution commitment of the issue to coordinate political department; or lack ofiudiciallv discoverable and manageable standards for resolving it..."lf,l*on v. Unitea Smtes, 506 U.S. 221 (1993)l

Luther v. Borden, 48 u.S. I (1519) Denied all courts jurisdiction to hear strictly political maffers.

O'Brien v. Brown, 109 U.S. I (1972) Ruled that equity courts must refrain from interfering in the

administration of the internal affairs of a political party. The court will note that any number of people,

including a single person, can define a political party.

Title 28 > Part V > Chapter I I I > 51652$1652 State laws as rule qf decision

The laws of the several states, except where the Constitution or treaties of the United States or Acts ofCongress otherwise require or provide, shall be regarded as rules of decision in civil actions in the courts

of the United States, in cases where they apply.

There is no Federal Common Law, and Congress has no power to declare substantive rules of Common

Law applicable in a state. Whether they be local or general in the nature, be they commercial law or a part

of the Law of Torts" lErie Rsilroadv. Tompkins,304 U.S. 64 (1938)l

"United States" is defined as federal territory within 26 U.S.C. $$7701(aX9) and (aX10). 7701(aX39), and

7408(d), and 4 U.S.C. $110(d).It does not include any portion of a Constitutional State of the Union.

The "District of Columbia" is defined as a federal corporation but not a physical place, a "body politic",

or a de jure "government" within the District o-f Columbia Act of 1871, l6 Stat. 419, 126, Sec. 34.

ooFor the Lord is our Judge, the Lord is our Lawgiver, the Lord is our King; He will save [and protect] us."

V;otslx J3;22, B i b I e, NKJ4

1lF.:ge

Certified Moil# 701-0 0290 000L 8242 6640; Certified Mail# 701-0 0290 0001- 82426657Certified Mail# 7070 0290 0001 8242 7586

"Corporations are also of all grades, and made for varied objects: all governments are corporations:

created bv usaqe and common consent, or grants und churters which create a bodv politic forErrescribed purposes: but whether thev ure privflte, local or general, in their obiects, for the eniovment

of orooertv. of the exercise of power, thev are qll governed bv the same rules of law, us to the

construction and the obligation of the instrument bv which the incornoration is msde [the Constitution

is the corporate charterl.

lproprietors of Cno 36 U.S. 120 (1837)l

AFFIDAVIT OF I REFUTE YOTIRPRESUMPTIONo

I ,'lgi{-d4A {rrur'BC{l a l00oh living sentient being. flesh and blood do

@egoingistrue.correct,andaccuratetomybestbelief and knowledge.

"Indeed, no more than (affidavits) is necessary to make prima facie case."

United States vs. Kis, 658 F. 2"d, 526, 536 (7th Cir. 1981) Cert Denied,50 U.S. L.W.2169; S. Ct. March 22, 1982

state: Georgia (republic 1861)

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT O F NOTARY

)

) For verification purposes only)Cot"utcountv:

on tnn |t* day of , Two Thousund Eleven, before me,

G n, t/n ^n @,.t,-z.t-* a Notary

Name, Title of OfJicer of Notury Public

Personally appeared, Sovereign King: Bey personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactoryevidence of identification) to be a person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument(s) and acknowledged to

me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument the person orthe entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed that instrument.

I4/itnessed, my hand and fficial seal.

Notarv Public

^""'::i"'#'l'!:u'

s$riff#z=wi- ?^'r* F-! mi'-^elicr, -Qrc- 3! -j2"4;*'i'u.

G n, sl> a* (j.u.dl

2ll:;c