southern regional committee - src - … and minutes 2010-13/minutes... · web viewsouthern regional...

245 th Meeting of SRC 19-21st May 2013

SOUTHERN REGIONAL COMMITTEENATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION

BANGALORE

Minutes of the 245th Meeting of SRC held at the Conference Hall of NCTE, Bangalore on 19th – 21st May 2013

The following members attended the Meeting :-

1. Sathyam I.A.S (Retired) - Chairman 2 Prof. K. Dorasami - Member

3. Dr. M.P. Vijayakumar I.A.S(retired)- Member

4. Prof. Sandeep Ponnala - Member

5. Prof. M.S. Lalithamma - Member 6. Sri. P. Sriraman - Convenor

Regional Director (I/c)

The following members/Representative did not attend the Meeting

Prof. M.A. Khader. Member and the Representatives of the Govts. of Andhra Pradesh, Kerala, Karnataka, Tamilnadu, U.T’s of Lakshadweep, Pondicherry & Andaman & Nicobar Islands.

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

1


SOUTHERN REGIONAL COMMITTEENATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATIONBANGALORE

MINUTES OF 245 th MEETING OF SRC-NCTE

Consideration of Agenda Items- Volume-01 Court Cases

Sl.No

CodeCourseName of the

Institution

State

Remarks

1. Supreme Court Order

This office received an e-mail on 14.05.2013 from NCTE (HQ) attaching Hon’ble Supreme Court Orders dt. 22.04.2013 and 09.05.2013 (modified earlier order dt. 22.04.2013).

These judgments are in continuation of main judgment dt. 13.12.2012 pertains to Maa Viashno Devi and ors.

NCTE (HQ) informed that Hon’ble Court allowed NCTE to rolled over all pending applications to the processing for grant of recognition for the session 2014-15, as prayed by the NCTE. As such no applications may be considered for any previous sessions as on date by the NCTE.

The Committee noted the matter and decided that

The Supreme Court has directed that all applications received by 31.12.2012 and not cleared before 03.03.2013 will be carried forward to 2014-15. Orders passed by SRC will be on this basis. Applicant-institutions should realise that even cases cleared in May-June-July 2013 will be relevant only for 2014-15 onwards.

2. APS01791

D.EdSt.Paul’

s Teacher Training

St. Paul’s Teacher Training Institute, No. 1, 2nd Main Road, BDA Layout, Pattegarapalya, Bangalore – 79, Karnataka.

St. Paul’s Teacher Training Institute, No.1, 2nd Main Road, BDA Layout, Pattegarapalya, Bangalore-79, Karnataka was granted recognition for offering D.Ed. course on 29.11.2004 from the academic session 2004-05 with an annual intake of 50 students with a condition to shift to its own premises within 3 years from the date of

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

Sl.No.

Brief Description Remarks of SRC

1 Confirmation of Minutes of 244th Meeting held on 09-11th May, 2013

Confirmed

2 Action Taken Report (ATR) on the Minutes of 243nd Meeting held on 29th -30th April, 2013 Noted

2


Institute, Bangalo

reKA

grant of recognition.

On 29.3.2012, a Carbon copy of the letter addressed to the Secretary to Govt., Education Dept., Government of Karnataka is received from the Director, DSERT, Bangalore stating that “a surprise inspection was conducted to the institution on 3.3.2012. The Management has made admission of 24 students under the management quota and no classes are being conducted. It was also pointed out that the institution is offering D.Ed., B.Ed. and M.Ed. course in the same building. Hence, a Notice is given to the Principal on 9.3.2012. There is no reply from the principal so far. As per the list of candidates admitted under management quota, all the students are from West Bengal. The Migration certificate dates are not tallying. As per the calendar only 3 months are left for examination and at this stage sanction of admissions is not permitted. Hence, the institution is offering the course illegally. The report submitted by the Principal, DIET is submitted for taking necessary action.”

The SRC in its 221st meeting held on 19th and 20th April, 2012 considered the complaint letter from DSERT Bangalore and all the relevant documentary evidences and decided to serve Show cause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act. Accordingly, a Show Cause Notice was issued to the institution on 18.05.2012. The reply to the Notice is received from the institution on 05.06.2012.

The SRC in its 228th meeting held on 24th – 25th July 2012 considered the reply of the institution vide letter dt. 05.06.2012 and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice. Accordingly, a show cause notice was issued to the institution on 16.08.2012. The institution submitted its written representation on 04.09.2012.

The SRC in its 234th meeting held on 17th –18th October 2012, considered the reply of the institution vide letter dt. 06.09.2012 and all the relevant documentary evidences and decided to serve Final Show cause Notice.

Accordingly, a Final Show Cause notice was issued on 22.11.2012. The institution submitted a written representation on 14.12.2012 and 24.01.2013

The SRC in its 242nd meeting held on 14-16 April, 2013 considered the written reply of the institution on the above matter and also the relevant documents of the institution and decided to withdraw recognition for the following reasons:- As per BCC, the land is on lease basis in the individual name which is not

permissible as per NCTE regulations 2009. As per copy of building plan submitted, the site area is 1477.66 Sq.mts. As

per NCTE Regulations 2009,for offering D.Ed, B.Ed and M.Ed programmes 3500 Sq.mts of land area is required.

The institution has not submitted blue print of the building plan approved by the competent authority.

NAAC certificate towards M.Ed course is not submitted. As seen from records, the institution is offering D.Ed, B.Ed and M.Ed courses

in leased premises. But, as per NCTE Regulations 2009, the institution must have its own permanent land and building for offering D.Ed, B.Ed and M.Ed courses.

Based on the above points the Committee decided to withdraw the recognition of the D.Ed course run by St. Paul’s Teacher Training Institute, No. 1, 2nd Main Road, BDA Layout, Pattegarapalya, Bangalore – 79, Karnataka, from the academic year 2013-

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

3


14, in order to enable the ongoing batch of students in D.Ed. course, if any, to complete their course.

It is made clear that the institution is debarred from making any further admission subsequent to the date of issue of this order. The Affiliating body / Examining board / body be informed accordingly. Further decided to return Endowment funds and Reserve fund deposited with SRC NCTE, Bangalore, if any.

This office has not yet issued Withdrawal order to the institution.

In the meanwhile, on 30.4.2013, a copy of the High Court order dated 25 th April, 2013 in W.P.No. 18924 filed by St. Paul’s Teacher Training Institute is received by this office from the Principal, St. Paul’s College of Education wherein NCTE, New Delhi is the first respondent and SRC,NCTE is the second respondent.

The Petitioner has prayed that admission to D.Ed course will not be made by the institution without the leave of the court and therefore an interim order may be granted, so that studies of the students who are already undergoing the training are not affected.

The Interim order dated 25.04.2013 in W.P.No 18924/2013 dated 25.04.2013 is as under ;“ As I find substance in these contentions and prima facie, it is seen that the impugned order suffers from non-application of mind to the materials placed on record and is not preceded by any opportunity of being heard given to the petitioner , there shall be an interim order of stay of the impugned order, subject to the condition that the petitioner – institution shall not make any admission to the D.Ed course without seeking leave of the Court.Post the case along with W.P.Nos 17161 – 17162/2013 on 05.06.2013.”

The advocate is requested to vacate the interim stay granted to the institution vide order dated 25.04.2013 and defend the case in the interest of SRC, NCTE, Bangalore and NCTE, New Delhi and intimate further developments to this office at the earliest vide this office letter dated 09.05.2013.

It was also brought to the Notice of the advocate that the petitioner has not preferred an appeal before the appellate authority, NCTE, New Delhi under section 18 of the NCTE Act.

The Committee considered the matter and noted the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka’s direction dt. 25.04.2013.

2. SCERT (Karnataka) to be informed immediately about the Hon’ble High Court direction to the institution that “there shall be an interim order of stay of the impugned order, subject to the condition that the petitioner –institution shall not make any admission to the D.Ed course without seeking leave of the Court.3. The Hon’ble High Court has pointed out in their order dt. 25.04.2013 that enough opportunity is being not heard nor given to the petitioner. Enough opportunity was given to the institution by SRC by way of 1) Deficiency letter issued, VT inspection was done, 3 show cause notices were given vide letters dt.18.05.2012, 16.08.2012 & 22.11.2012 to explain & rectify the deficiencies pointed out in the notices. The institution could not rectify the deficiencies pointed out in the above show cause notices. The lawyer is to be informed that there is no provision for personal hearing by SRC as suggested by the Hon’ble

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

4


High Court.

4.The Lawyer is to be informed to highlight the strict enforcement of norms/standards as per Supreme court order.

Keeping in view, Supreme Court vide their order in Civil Appeal No. 1125-1128/2011 in SLP No. 17165-68/2009 filed by NCTE Vs ors, which reads as under:

“An institution is not entitled to recognition unless it fulfils the conditions specified in various clauses of the Regulations. The Council is directed to ensure that in future no institution is granted recognition unless it fulfils the conditions laid down in the Act and the Regulations and the time schedule fixed for processing the application by the Regional Committee and communication of the decision on the issue of recognition it strictly adhered to”.

Further,5. The committee confirmed the action taken to get the ‘stay’ vacated through our advocate vide our letter dt. 09.05.2013.

4. APS08873

M.EdSt.Paul’s M.Ed College, Bangalo

reKA

St.Paul’s M.Ed College,No.1,2nd Main, B.D.A Layout, Pattegarapalya, Banglore- 560079, Karnataka.

St.Paul’s M.Ed College, No.1,2nd Main, B.D.A Layout, Pattegarapalya, Bangalore was granted recognition for M.Ed course with an intake of 25 students vide- order F.SRO/NCTE/M.Ed/2008-09/16029 dated17.12.2007. Enhancement of intake of 10 seats from existing 25 to 35 has been permitted vide orde F.SRO/NCTE/2010-2011/20643 dated 24.08.2010.

A report is received on 14.9.2012 from the chairman and on behalf of Members of Bangalore University Task Force on M.Ed. Colleges affiliated to Bangalore University.

The reports states that “ the Task Force visited 7 M.Ed. Colleges affiliated to Bangalore University and submitted its report to the Hon’ble Vice Chancellor on 22nd August, 2012 and further a special meeting of Academic Council of Bangalore University was convened to discuss and approve the report of the Task Force.

In the light of the above, the members of Task Force thought of appraising SRC on its findings for kind notice and necessary action”.The SRC in its 233rd Meeting held on 26th – 28th September 2012 considered the Report of Bangalore University, Task force of the 7 M.Ed colleges affiliated to Bangalore University vide letter dt. 14/09/2012 and it was decided to serve Show Cause Notice under NCTE Act.

Accordingly, a show cause notice was issued to the institution on 19.11.2012. The institution submitted a written representations on 06.12.2012 and 14.12.2012.

The SRC in its 241st meeting held on 29th and 31st March and 1st April, 2013 considered the written reply of the institution on the above matter and also the relevant documents of the institution and decided to withdraw recognition for the following reasons:- No documentary proof is submitted for providing exclusive infrastructural facilities

for offering D.Ed(APSO 1791)/B.Ed(APSO 1834) and M.Ed (APSO 8873) courses. Staff list approved by Bangalore University for 2012-13 is not submitted. Smt. Kalyani’s name is available in the approved staff list of Vijaya College dated

10/10/2012.

(S.Sathyam) Chairman

5


No documentary proof submitted towards the conduct of academic events for awarding Internal assessment marks.

As per the approved staff list dated 08/03/2010 of Bangalore University, the following lecturers are working in M.Ed College. a) Smt. Nandini Vinay b) Smt. Roopa Sharaschander c) Smt.Geetha .K d) Smt.Vedavathi .H e) Smt. Dr. Mary Suvarna As per NCTE norms, there should be 1 HOD/ Associate Professor, 1- Professor and 3 Assistant Professors. Further the name of Smt. Nandini .N is approved by Bangalore University as Assistant Professor for M.Ed Course in Vijaya College dated 10/10/2012 approved by Bangalore University.

As seen from records of the file, the institution is offering B.Ed ,D.Ed and M.Ed course in leased premises.But, as per NCTE Regulations 2009, the institution must has its own permanent building.

As per the VT Report, the built up area earmarked for M.Ed course is 550 sq.mts. which is very much less as per NCTE regulations 2009.

Based on the above points the committe decided to withdraw the recognition of the M.Ed course run by the St. Paul’s M.Ed College, No. 1, 2nd, Main, B.D.A. Layout, Pattearapalya, Bangalore – 560079, Karnataka from the academic year 2013-14, in order to enable the ongoing batch of students in M.Ed, course, if any, to complete their course.

It is made clear that the institution is debarred from making any further admission subsequent to the date of issue of this order. The Affiliating body / Examining board / body be informed accordingly. Further decided to return Endowment funds and Reserve fund deposited with SRC NCTE, Bangalore, if any.

This office has not yet issued the Withdrawal order to the institution.In the meanwhile, a copy of the Interim order of High Court of Karnataka in W.P.No. 17161 – 17162 filed by Pali Education Society, Prashanthnagar and Karnataka International Education Trust, Banneghatta Road, Bangalore is received by this office on 30.04.2013 from the Principal, St. Paul’s College of Education, where in NCTE,New Delhi is the first respondent and SRC,NCTE is the second respondent.

The grievance of the petitioners in the writ petitions is that without considering the reply and without providing an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner-institutions, the impugned orders withdrawing the recognition have been passed.

The interim order dated 19.04.2013 in W.P.No. 17161 – 17162 reads as under:-

“On perusal of the impugned order, I find that without assigning any reasons, the respondent has proceeded to withdraw the recommendation. Prima facie it is clear that there is non-application of mind to the reply submitted and there is no opportunity of hearing given to petitioners. The impugned orders, therefore ,prima facie appear to be in clear violation of principles of natural justice.

Hence, I am inclined to issue Emergent notice to the respondents , returnable within two weeks.

Till the next date of hearing, there shall be an interim order of stay on the impugned orders. Petitioners shall serve the standing Counsel for the respondent University and file acknowledgements for effecting such service mentioned in their names, office to list the matter by showing the names of the Counsel for the University.”

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

6





2. The Hon’ble High Court has pointed out in their order dt. 25.04.2013 that enough opportunity is being not heard nor given to the petitioner. Enough opportunity was given to the institution by SRC by way of 1) Deficiency letter issued, VT inspection was done 2) Show cause notice was given to the institution in its 233rd meeting held on 26-28th, 2012 to explain & rectify the deficiencies pointed out in the notices. The institution could not rectify the deficiencies pointed out in the above show cause notice. The lawyer is to be informed that there is no provision for personal hearing by SRC as suggested by the Hon’ble High Court.

3. The Lawyer is to be informed to highlight the strict enforcement of norms/standards as per Supreme court order.



Further,4. The committee confirmed the action taken to get the ‘stay’ vacated through our advocate vide our letter dt. 09.05.2013..

5. APS08149

M.EdKIET

College of

Education (Post

Graduation

Studies),

Bangalo

KIET College of Education (Post Graduation Studies) Bannerghatta Main Road, Bismillah Nagar, Bangalore-560029

KIET College of Education (Post Graduation Studies) Bannerghatta Main Road, Bismillah Nagar, Bangalore was granted recognition for M.Ed course with an intake of 25 students vide- order F.SRC/NCTE/2009/M.Ed/18588 dated 06.03.2008. Enhancement of intake of 10 seats from existing 25 to 35 has been permitted vide – order F.No.F.SRO/NCTE/2010-2011/24678 dated 03.12.2010.

A letter dated 20.7.2012 from Advocate Ashok Harnahalli’s office along with the judgement in W.P.No.30609/2009 filed by Karnataka International Education Trust was received by this office on 27.8.2012.

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

7


reKA

As per the letter the advocate had stated that “the above w.p. was filed questioning the communication dated 14.10.2009 issued by the Respondent –SRC intimating the petitioner that the inspection of the petitioner institution will be conducted on 20.10.2009.

The above writ petition came up for consideration before the Hon’ble Court today for preliminary hearing in ‘B Group’. After hearing the matter, the Hon’ble Court directed the NCTE to provide a copy of the complaint dated 11.6.2009 received from the students of KIET College of education(M.Ed.) within 15 days along with the inspection report so as to enable the petitioner to submit a reply to the same. The Hon’ble Court observed that the petitioner is required to submit a reply to the inspection report and the complaint within a fortnight thereafter. The Hon’ble Court observed that in view of the above direction, the writ petition will not survive for consideration and disposed off the matter. You are requested to comply with the order of Hon’ble Court by providing a copy of the complaint dated 11.6.2009 and the inspection report of the petitioner institution. After considering the reply, if any, by the petitioner, the NCTE may take a decision in the above matter.I have applied for a certified copy of the final order and the same will be sent to you as soon as it is received.”

As per directions, a draft letter to the institution along with a copy of the complaint and copy of the inspection report with a CC copy to the advocate is put up for perusal and approval/further orders, please

As per directions of the Advocate dated 20.7.2012 and in compliance to the Court order, a draft letter is issued to the institution on 29.8.2012 along with a copy of the complaint and a copy of the inspection report. A copy of the letter dated 29.8.2012 was also sent to the advocate for information.

A copy of the Court order in W.P.No.30609 of 2009 dated 20.7.2012 is received from the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka on 3.9.2012 between KIET and SRC, NCTE. The order dated 20th July, 2012 had stated that “petitioner would be made available copies of complaints following which notices Annexure-F was issued for inspection and in respect of which a report Annedure-R4 is submitted, to which the petitioner may submit an explanation or objection and extend an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, nothing further survives for consideration in this petition and is accordingly disposed of.

In continuation of the above letter regarding W.P.No.30609/2009, a reply is received from the institution on 11.10.2012 in response to this office letter dated 29.8.2012. Only signature is available in the reply. The name and designation of the person who has replied is not known. The reply stated that “

1. This College has not commenced M.Ed. course for academic session 2009. Unfortunately, this never exists. M.Ed. students made a complaint on 3.6.2009.

2. Bangalore University has issued order for commencement of M.Ed. on 4.2.2009. Virtually, the admission to M.Ed.programme stated from 5.10.2009.The copy of calendar of events of Bangalore University for the academic session 2009-10 dated 31.10.2009 is enclosed herewith.

3. NCTE issued a notice based on this false complaint on 25.8.2009 to this institute.

4. We submitted reply denying all the allegations and giving the details of infrastructure and infrastructural facilities available with us and prayed for

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

8


closing the issue on 9.9.2009. Without verifying the genuinity of the complaint NCTE order for inspection under sec17 on 14.10.2009.

5. Institution has requested through communication dated 15.10.2009 for postponement of inspection as 17,18 & 19 of October, 2009 were the General Holidays on account of Deepavali.

6. Our council has also submitted a letter stating that the institution has prayed for interim order in High Court of Karnataka for staying the operations of letter dated 15.10.2009.

7. NCTE has hurriedly conducted inspection on 20.10.2009 without giving an opportunity of hearing us. In spite of the interim stay of the Hon’ble High Court in W.P.No.30609/2009 which was communicated well before the commencement of inspection.

8. Your office received the VT report on 23.10.2009 vide inward no.89377 states that received only VT report without VCD, the VCD was not submitted deliberately by your V.T. members. The copy of the same VCD is enclosed.

This institution has submitted all the details with documentary evidence like photos, CDs in replying to the filled enquiries to your office on 30.7.2009. Regarding infrasturcture-The trust has its own land constructed pakka RCC building built-up area which is more than sufficient to run the Teacher Education programme. The certificate issued by the Govt. Engineer also submitted along with the filled enquiries. However, the copy of the same is enclosed herewith.

As we have not started M.Ed. programme, the complaint made by fictitious of M.Ed. students not tenable, viable from far from truth and deserved to be ignored. The false and tailor made complaint should have been verified before initiating action against the institution.We have submitted parawise replies to your office on 18.9.2012. As regards, the staff, the trust has appointed required faculty members and approved staff list from affiliated University/Board is enclosed herewith.”

In the meanwhile, a Notice is received on 17.09.2012 from the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in W.P.No.33635/2012 and 33913 of 2012 in which SRC, NCTE is the 4th respondent to appear before the Hon’ble Court on 17.9.2012. The writ petition is filed against Bangalore University and others by KIET and Pali Education Society. The petitioner is praying for interim relief staying the resolution dated 30.8.2012 and all the adverse action under and in pursuance thereof in so far as the same pertains to the petitioners only, pending disposal of this writ petition.

A report is received on 14.9.2012 from the Chairman & on behalf of Members of Bangalore University Task force on M.Ed Colleges affiliated to Bangalore University.

The reports states that “the Task force visited 7 M.Ed Colleges affiliated to Bangalore University and submitted its report to the Hon’ble Vice Chancellor on 22nd August,2012 and further a special meeting of Academic Council of Bangalore University was convened to discuss and approve the report of the Task force.In the light of the above, the members of Task force thought of appraising SRC on its findings for kind notice and necessary action”.The SRC in its 233rd meeting held on 26th- 28th September 2012 considered the report of Bangalore University, Task force of the 7 M.Ed colleges affiliated to Bangalore University vide letter dated 14/09/2012 and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under NCTE Act.

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

9


Accordingly, a show cause notice was issued on 07.11.2012. The institution submitted a written representation on 29.11.2012.

The SRC in its 241st meeting held on 29th and 31st March and 1st April, 2013 considered the written reply of the institution on the above matter and also the relevant documents of the institution and decided to withdraw recognition for the following reasons:-

No documentary proof is submitted for providing infrastructure as per NCTE norms.

Approved staff list from the University is not submitted. The name of Mr.Shashikant Akkoni, librarian does not figure in the Copies of

attendance register submitted from March 2012 to August 2012 and is also not included in the staff list submitted for approval.

No documentary proof is provided with respect to evaluation of test papers and allotment of Marks to students.

No documentary proof is provided towards maintenance of Fee Register. No documentary proof is provided towards the maintenance of Staff Service

register. No documentary proof is submitted to prove the disbursement of scholarship

for M.Ed students. As seen from the file, the institution was granted recognition for offering

D.Ed(APSO 1926) B.Ed (APSO 2199) and M.Ed (APSO8149) courses in leased premises, which is not Permissible as per NCTE regulations,2009.

The land is not in the name of the Society/Institution. As per NCTE regulations, 2009, the land should be in the name of the institution.

So far, the institution has not shifted from temporary to own/permanent premises.

Based on the above points the committee decides to withdraw the recognition of the M.Ed course run by, KIET College of Education (Post Graduation Studies) Bannerghatta main Road, Bismillah Nagar, Bangalore – 560029, Karnataka from the academic year 2013-14, in order to enable the ongoing batch of students in M.Ed, course, if any, to complete their course.

But it is made clear that the institution is debarred from making any further admission subsequent to the date of issue of this order. The Affiliating body / Examining board / body be informed accordingly. Further decided to return Endowment funds and Reserve fund deposited with SRC NCTE, Bangalore, if any.

This office has not yet issued the Withdrawal order to the institution.In the meanwhile, a copy of the Interim order of High Court of Karnataka in W.P.No. 17161 – 17162 filed by Pali Education Society, Prashanthnagar and Karnataka International Education Trust, Banneghatta Road, Bangalore is received by this office on 30.04.2013 from the Principal, St. Paul’s College of Education, where in NCTE,New Delhi is the first respondent and SRC,NCTE is the second respondent.

The grievance of the petitioners in the writ petitions is that without considering the reply and without providing an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner-institutions, the impugned orders withdrawing the recognition have been passed.

The interim order dated 19.04.2013 in W.P.No. 17161 – 17162 reads as under:-

“On perusal of the impugned order, I find that without assigning any reasons, the respondent has proceeded to withdraw the recommendation. Prima facie it is clear that there is non-application of mind to the reply submitted and there is no opportunity of

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

10


hearing given to petitioners. The impugned orders, therefore ,prima facie appear to be in clear violation of principles of natural justice.

Hence, I am inclined to issue Emergent notice to the respondents , returnable within two weeks.

Till the next date of hearing, there shall be an interim order of stay on the impugned orders. Petitioners shall serve the standing Counsel for the respondent University and file acknowledgements for effecting such service mentioned in their names, office to list the matter by showing the names of the Counsel for the University.”




2. The Hon’ble High Court has pointed out in their order dt. 19.04.2013 that enough opportunity is being not heard nor given to the petitioner. Enough opportunity was given to the institution by SRC by way of 1) Deficiency letter issued, 2) VT inspection was done, 3) Show cause notices were issued to the institution to explain & rectify the deficiencies pointed out in the notices. The lawyer is to be informed that there is no provision for personal hearing by SRC as suggested by the Hon’ble High Court.

3.The Lawyer is to be informed to highlight the strict enforcement of norms/standards as per Supreme court order.



Further,4. The committee confirmed the action taken to get the ‘stay’ vacated informed to the advocate through our letter dt. 09.05.2013.

6. AOS00596/

APS00541

B.EdDBHPS

DBHPS Dr. B.D. Jatti College of Education, Afzalpur Takke, Bijapur - 506102, KarnatakaDBHPS Dr.B.D. Jatti College of Education, Afzalpur Takke, Bijapur - 506102, Karnataka was granted recognition by SRC for offering B.Ed. course with an intake of 60 students from the session 2000-2001 vide order dated 10.07.2000.

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

11


Dr. B.D. Jatti

College of

Education,

Bijapur District

KA

A Complaint was received on 18.11.2009 from the Secretary, Hindi Prachar Mandali, Bijapur, Karnataka addressed to the Chairperson, NCTE, New Delhi regarding misappropriation of funds and Mal-administration of DBHPS institutions in Karnataka. The Complaint was forwarded to SRC from NCTE, Delhi on 10.12.2009.

The allegations made against DBHPS institutions by the complainant is as under:-“1. Further, I would like to bring to your kind notice that the student intake is only 100 as per NCTE norms. But in the following colleges they have admitted more than 100 students by taking huge money from other than South India. 1. Dharwad120, 2. Bijapur-150, 3. Belgaum and mysore also excess of students in the attendance they are studying.

2. If NCTE will visit it will be proved through the attendance register, accounts register and how much money collected from the students. It is noticed Sabha people under he instructon of Mr. Neeral Katti collecting 40,000 Rs. And accounting only 20 and 15 thousand rupees. So this matter is very serious and visiting team may sent for investigation and remedy.

3. In all colleges disqualified lecturers persons are appointed as lecturers with fake degrees by taking huge amount from the students by Mr. R.F. Neeral Katti and Dr. Dilip Singh.

4. All the Principals are under the instruction of Mr. Neeral Katti only not any other officer and even vice chancellor of Sabha Mr. Chinnayan also. Dr. Malimath is the president chancellor of the Sabha but he became of mouth piece of Mr. R.F. Neeral Katti,Mr. Malimath being the Karnataka person and close person of Mr. Neeral Katti and he is not carrying anything of the Sabha in the Capacity of the President.”

Further, this office was in receipt of another letter dated 19.8.2009 from Sri. Om Narain,Lecturer of Hari Bawa Inter college Gawan, Badaun District, Uttar Pradesh regarding malpractices in B.Ed. College of Dakshin Bharath Hindi Prachar Sabha, Karnataka. The above letter has been forwarded by NCTE, Hqrs. on 16.11.2009.

The complainant had stated that the annual intake in B.Ed. classes has been fixed at 100 students and the following colleges are admitting more than 100 students and adjusting these excess students against the leftover vacant seats for the preceding years i.e., 2007-2008 and 2008-09:

1. DBHPS Dr. B.D. Jatti Siksha College, Afzalpur, Takke Athani Road, Bijapur-586101, Karnataka.

2. DBHPS Dr. B.D. Jatti Siksha College, Jilla Hospital Rasta(District Hospital road), Belgaum-590001.

3. Vishveshwara Siksha College, K.R. Mohalla, Bani Vilas Road, Mysore-570004.

Further, the complainant had stated that these students neither attend the classes nor go to teaching schools, even then they get more than 80% marks and has requested to investigate in the matter and punish the defaulters.

The SRC in its 188th meeting held on 28-29 January, 2010 considered the matter and decided to cause inspection to the institution after obtaining the details of infrastructural and instructional facilities in the Questionnaire format.

Accordingly, letter was issued to all 5 DBHPS institutions on 8.3.2010/5.3.2010 to submit explanation along with 10 documents to submit as per Questionnaire within 21

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

12


days from the date of receipt of the letter.

The institution submitted its written representation on 30.03.2010.

SRC in its 191st meeting held on 20-21 April 2010 considered the written representation submitted on 30.03.2010 and decided to cause inspection under section 17. Accordingly, inspection was carried out on 03.06.2010 and the SRC in its 193rd

meeting held on 21-22 June, 2010 considered the report and decided to withdraw recognition.

Accordingly, inspection was carried out on 03.06.2010 and the Committee considered the Report and decided to withdraw recognition for B.Ed. course for the following reasons :-

As per VT Report and as admitted/countersigned by the institution, the total built-up-area of the building comes to 6208 sq.ft. which is far short of the NCTE norms of 16,000 sq.ft.

Shiksha Snatak course is also being run in the same building. Psychology lab. materials needs to be strengthened. There is no

Language learning lab. In 2008-09 and 2009-10 academic year , institutions have made admissions

of 120 and 121 respectively which is more than the intake sanctioned and thus violated NCTE norms.

Withdrawal order was issued to the institution on 02.08.2010.

Further, this office was in receipt of a copy of the complaint dated 23.11.2010 from aggrieved students which has been addressed to Sri.Kapil Sibal, Ministry of HRD, New Delhi regarding trade of marks cards and certificate in respect of Hindi Distance Education.

In the complaint it has been stated that the Centers of DBHP in remote villages are collecting 40 to 50 thousand rupees and granting certificates to various degrees like MA, M.Phil and Ph.D and also they are conducting exams twice in a year.

The eligibility for taking such exams are as follows: 10+2+ Hindi Praveen of Equivalent Exam are eligible to take M.A.Exam 10+2+ Hindi Praveen /Equivalent +Shikshak Training are eligible to take even

M.Ed Exam.

Further, only Karnataka Government has given its recognition to these degrees for admissions only they are collecting very huge amounts around 50 to 60 thousands rupees from the students to the student and swindling the collected amount without any benefit to students. No classes, no lecturers and no practical classes are being held at any of the centres.

The Secretary of the DBHPS, Chennai has issued a pamphlet stating that a sum of Rs.500/- per students will be paid to the pracharak who encourages the students to get admission to these courses and has requested to take action immediately to stop this fraud.

The complainant had stated that last year the NCTE conducted investigation in Karnataka about the genuineness of marks cards and certificates issued by DBHPS

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

13


and found so many loop holes. Such as the exams conducted elsewhere and where as the name of the centres mentioned in the marks cards and certificate are quite different.

Further, SRC, NCTE has not given any recognition to Hindi course run through Distance Education mode. The recognition accorded to 5 DBHPS institutions run in Karnataka has been withdrawn during 02.08.2010 for B.Ed course based on the complaint.

Accordingly, a letter was issued to the institution on 10.02.2011.

In the meantime, aggrieved by the Withdrawal order, the institution preferred an appeal to NCTE, Hqrs and the appellant authority has noted that recognition was granted to the institution vide SRC’s order dated 10.7.2000. When, as per the NCTE regulations in vogue, no total minimum land and built up area required for B.Ed. course were not specifically laid down. Subsequently, after the NCTE Regulations, 2005, which came into force from 13.1.2006, through an amendment to the Regulations dated 20.07.2006, the minimum land and built up area required for B.Ed. course were prescribed as 2500 sq.mtrs and 1500 sq.mtrs. respectively. The Regulations, 2005 also prescribed that whenever there were changes in the norm, the recognized institutions should upgrade the facilities to conform to the revised norms before the commencement of the new academic session after the revised norms came into force. The latest NCTE Regulations, 2009, which came into force from August,2009 also specifically laid down that the institution, shall comply with the requirements laid down in the revised norms and standards immediately but not later than one year from the date of effect of the revised norms. However, the revised land area related norms shall not be applicable to the existing institutions if the same was not possible as per clause 8(13) of Regulations, 2009. But the required built up area shall have to be increased by them to conform to the revised norms, shall not be allowed to expand by way of additional courses or additional intake.

In the light of provisions in the NCTE regulations as amended from time to time, the institution was required to have a minimum built up area of 1500 sq.mtrs or 16146 sq.ft. for running a B.Ed. Course. The Council noted that in pursuance of a complaint received by the NCTE against the institution, the SRC in its 191st meeting held on 20-24 April, 2010, decided to get the institution inspected under Section 17 of the NCTE Act,1993 which has empowered the Regional Committees to withdraw recognition of such recognized institutions, which contravened provisions of NCTE Act/Rules/Regulations. It provides that where the Regional Committee is on its own motion or on any representation received from any person, satisfied that a recognized institution has contravened any of the provisions of the Act, or the rules, regulations, orders made or issued thereunder, or any condition subject to which recognition under Section 14 or permission under Section 15 was granted, it may withdraw recognition of such recognized institution for reasons to be recorded in writing. It is thus implied that while it is not mandatory for the Regional Committee in its discretion, decides to conduct an inspection. Accordingly, the SRC vide its letter dated 26.4.2010 asked the institution to furnish filled-in questionnaire along with requisite documents. The institution furnished the filled-in questionnaire along with requisite documents. The institution furnished the filled in questionnaire, affidavits etc. vide its letter dated 6.5.2010. In the filled in questionnaire, the institution indicated that the available land and built up area with the institution was 625.7 sq.mtrs or 6735 sq.ft. In the affidavit dated 4.5.2010 furnished by the institution, it indicated that the available land and built up area was 6736 sq.ft. each. The visiting team, which conducted the inspection under

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

14


Section 17 of the NCTE Act, in its report dated 3.6.2010 indicated that the available land and area with the institution was 4910 sq.ft. and 6736 sq.ft.(excluding common area) respective ely. Thus, the VT report dated 3.6.2010 also bear testimony to the claim made by the available built up area with the institution was 6736 sq.ft. or 625.7 sq.mts. only as against the requirement of minimum of 1500 sq.mts. as per NCTE regulations. When the position was pointed out to the representatives of the DBHPS, as in case of other institutions run by them they informed that the Principal of the College inadvertently furnished wrong information regarding built up area to the SRC and the VT and that the actual built up area available exclusively for the B.Ed. course was 16200 sq.ft. i.e., 1550 sq.mts. They also stated that adequate labs, game and sports facilities were available as per the NCTE norms with the institution and the faculty members were qualified as per NCTE norms, as already indicated in their appeal and the records available could be verified. The Council also noted that the SRC issued the withdrawal order dated 02.08.2010 directly without issuing any showcause notice on the basis of the VTR, for making a representation by the institution as required under the provision of the NCTE Act. The Council therefore came to the conclusion that there was adequate justification in accepting the appeal with the direction to SRC for issuance of show cause notice and for further action thereafter.

After perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT report and after considering the oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the council reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal and reverse the SRC’s order dated 2.8.2010 with the direction to the SRC for issuance of showcause notice and for further action thereafter. Accordingly, the appeal was accepted and the order of the SRC dated 2.8.2010 reversed vide HQ order No.89-1010/2010-Appeal A29354 dated 23.12.2010.

The institution had preferred an appeal to NCTE, Hqrs and the appellant authority has reversed the withdrawal order of SRC vide order dated 23.12.2010 with a direction to the SRC for issuance of show cause notice.

The SRC in its 200th meeting held on 20-21 January 2011 considered the Appellate authority order dated 23.12.2010 VT report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to issue show cause notice. Accordingly, Show cause notice was issued to the institution on 11.03.2011 for the following reasons:1. As per VT Report and as admitted/countersigned by the institution, the total built-

up-area of the building comes to 6208 sq.ft. which is far short of the NCTE norms of 16,000 sq.ft.

2. Shiksha Snatak course is also being run in the same building.3. Psychology lab. materials needs to be strengthened. There is no Language

learning lab.4. In 2008-09 and 2009-10 academic year , institutions have made admissions of 120

and 121 respectively which is more than the intake sanctioned and thus violated NCTE norms.

Now, with the references to the above notice issued by SRC, NCTE dated 11.03.2011 the same was challenged before the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka in W.P.No. 13832-13837/2011 (EDN- RES). The Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka after considering the matter has ordered the Stay on all further proceedings by SRC. They have also submitted a copy of the order in W.P.No. 13832-13837/2011 dated 07.04.2011 of Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka.

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

15


Further, the institution has submitted its written representation on 21.02.2011 for the letter dated 10.02.2011, wherein the institution had stated that they have no remarks/comments to offer in this behalf as the letter does not have anything to complain against the college, it specifically mentions Hindi Distance Education, which is not at all concerned with this college.

The SRC in its 204th meeting held on 27th and 28th April, 2011 considered the above matter and decided to get the stay vacated.

The institution had filed a writ petition against the Showcause Notice issued to the institution vide W.P.No.13832-37/2011 filed by Dakshina Bharath Hindi Prachar Sabha(5 institutions) in Karnataka and others.

As per the decision of SRC, the advocate was requested to vacate the interim stay granted to the institutions vide this office letters dated 11.5.2011, 5.12.2011, 16.4.2012, 4.9.2012 and 6.1.2013.

A letter dated 13.2.2013 is received by this office on 30.4.2013 from Ashok Haranahalli Associates regarding W.P.No.13832-37/2011 of Dakshina Bharath Hindi Prachar Sabha and others wherein 1st respondent is the NCTE, New Delhi, 2nd respondent is the SRC, NCTE, 3rd respondent is Union of India, Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs represented by its Secretary, No.87, Parliament House, Parliament Street, New Delhi-110004 and 4th respondent is the Union of India, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Dept. of Higher Education, represented by its Secretary, Shastri Bhavan, New Delhi-110115.

The writ petition is filed by Dakshin Bharat Hindi Prachar Sabha, Karnataka Branch, No.113/114, S.C. Road, Sheshadripuram, Bangalore-560020 in respect of 1. DBHPS Lal Bahadur Shastri College of Education, Bangalore 2. DBHPS Rajiv Gandhi College of Education, Dharwad 3. DBHPS Dr. B.D. Jatti College of Education, Bijapur 4. DBHPS Dr. B.D. Jatti College of Education, Belgaum and 5. DBHPS Basaveshwara College of Education, Mysore.

The writ petition was filed questioning the orders dated 23.12.2010 passed by the 1st

respondent-NCTE remanding the matter back to the 2nd respondent, and the consequential show-cause notices dated 11.3.2011 issued by the 2nd respondent-SRC.

Letter of Ashok Haranahalli Associates states that “the above matter came up for consideration before the Hon’ble High Court on 13.2.2013 for preliminary hearing in ‘B’ group. After hearing the matter, the Hon’ble Court quashed the impugned orders and notices and remanded the matter to the 1 st respondent – NCTE to consider the issue whether NCTE has got supervisory jurisdiction over the petitioner institutions, which are established under Central Legislation and also to consider the case of the petitioners. I have applied for the certified copy of the final order, and the same will be sent to you on its receipt.”

Further, the advocate has opined that “In my opinion the writ petitions were premature and as issuance of showcause notices cannot be questioned in the normal course. The learned Single Judge is also not correct in directing the NCTE to decide the issue whether NCTE has got supervision over petitioner institutions when the petitioner institutions are running the teacher training courses after obtaining recognition from NCTE. Further, NCTE Act prevails over all other Acts governing the field. Therefore,

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

16


in my opinion this is a fit case for filing a Writ Appeal.”

This office has not yet received certified copy of the order from Hon’ble Court and not even from the institutions. Since the 1st respondent is the NCTE, New Delhi and the direction of Hon’ble Court is for 1st respondent to consider the above issue.

The Committee considered the matter and decided to inform the Lawyer to file an Appeal against the Court order, by highlighting the grant of recognition by SRCNCTE, Bangalore to DBHS Dr. B.D. Jatti College of Education, Afzalpur Takke, Bijapur, Karnataka for offering B.Ed (APS00596) & B.Ed (APS00541) course with an intake of 60 students from the session 2000-2001 vide order dt. 10.07.2000.

7. AOS00156

B.EdDBHPS

Lal Bahadur Shastri College

of Educatio

n, Bangalo

reKA

DBHPS Lal Bahadur Shastri College of Education, 113/114, S.C.Road, Sheshadripuram, Bangalore – 560 020, Karnataka

DBHPS Lal Bahadur Shastri College of Education, 113/114, S.C.Road, Sheshadripuram, Bangalore – 560 020, Karnataka was granted recognition by SRC for offering B.Ed. course with an intake of 60 students from the session 2000-2001 vide order dated 10.07.2000.



2. If NCTE will visit it will be proved through the attendance register, accounts register and how much money collected from the students. It is noticed Sabha people under he instruction of Mr. Neeral Katti collecting 40,000 Rs. And accounting only 20 and 15 thousand rupees. So this matter is very serious and visiting team may sent for investigation and remedy.




(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

17








Accordingly, letter was issued to all 5 DBHPS institutions on 8.3.2010/5.3.2010 to submit explanation along with 10 documents to submit as per Questionnaire within 21 days from the date of receipt of the letter.

SRC in its 191st meeting held on 20-21 April 2010 considered the written representation submitted on 30.03.2010 and decided to cause inspection under section 17 of NCTE Act.

Accordingly, inspection was carried out on 3.6.2010.

SRC in its 193rd meeting held on 21-22 June, 2010 considered the report and decided to withdraw recognition for B.Ed. course. Accordingly, withdrawal order was issued to the institution on 02.08.10.


In the complaint it has been stated that the Centers of DBHP in remote villages are collecting 40 to 50 thousand rupees and granting certificates to various degrees like MA, M.Phil and Ph.D and also they are conducting exams twice in a year. The eligibility for taking such exams are as follows:

10+2+ Hindi Praveen of Equivalent Exam are eligible to take M.A.Exam 10+2+ Hindi Praveen /Equivalent +Shikshak Training are eligible to take even M.Ed

Exam.


(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

18



The complainant had stated that last year the NCTE conducted investigation in Karnataka about the genuineness of marks cards and certificates issued by DBHPS and found so many loop holes. Such as the exams conducted elsewhere and where as the name of the centres mentioned in the marks cards and certificate are quite different.



Aggrieved by the Withdrawal order, the institution preferred an appeal to NCTE, Hqrs and the appellant authority has noted that recognition was granted to the institution vide SRC’s order dated 10.7.2000. When, as per the NCTE regulations in vogue, no total minimum land and built up area required for B.Ed. course were not specifically laid down. Subsequently, after the NCTE Regulations, 2005, which came into force from 13.1.2006, through an amendment to the Regulations dated 20.07.2006, the minimum land and built up area required for B.Ed. course were prescribed as 2500 sq.mtrs and 1500 sq.mtrs. respectively. The Regulations, 2005 also prescribed that whenever there were changes in the norm, the recognized institutions should upgrade the facilities to conform to the revised norms before the commencement of the new academic session after the revised norms came into force. The latest NCTE Regulations, 2009, which came into force from August,2009 also specifically laid down that the institution, shall comply with the requirements laid down in the revised norms and standards immediately but not later than one year from the date of effect of the revised norms. However, the revised land area related norms shall not be applicable to the existing institutions if the same was not possible as per clause 8(13) of Regulations, 2009. But the required built up area shall have to be increased by them to conform to the revised norms, shall not be allowed to expand by way of additional courses or additional intake.

In the light of provisions in the NCTE regulations as amended from time to time, the institution was required to have a minimum built up area of 1500 sq.mtrs or 16146 sq.ft. for running a B.Ed. Course. The Council noted that in pursuance of a complaint received by the NCTE against the institution, the SRC in its 191st meeting held on 20-24 April, 2010, decided to get the institution inspected under Section 17 of the NCTE Act/Rules/Regulations. It provides that where the Regional Committee is on its own motion or on any representation received from any person, satisfied that a recognized institution has contravened any of the provisions of the Act, or the rules, regulations, orders made or issued thereunder, or any condition subject to which recognition under Section 14 or permission under Section 15 was granted, it may withdraw recognition of such recognized institution for reasons to be recorded in writing. It is thus implied that while it is not mandatory for the Regional Committee in its discretion, decides to conduct an inspection. Accordingly, the SRC vide its letter dated 26.4.2010 asked the institution to furnish filled-in questionnaire along with requisite documents. The

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

19


institution furnished the filled-in questionnaire along with requisite documents. The institution furnished the filled in questionnaire, affidavits etc. vide its letter dated 6.5.2010. In the filled in questionnaire, the institution indicated that the available land and built up area with the institution was 625.7 sq.mtrs or 6735 sq.ft. In the affidavit dated 4.5.2010 furnished by the institution, it indicated that the available land and built up area was 6736 sq.ft. each. The visiting team, which conducted the inspection under Section 17 of the NCTE Act, in its report dated 3.6.2010 indicated that the available land and built up area with the institution was 4910 sq.ft. and 6736 sq.ft.(excluding common area) respectively. Thus, the VT report dated 3.6.2010 also bear testimony to the claim made by the institution in the filled in questionnaire and affidavit dated 4.5.2010 that the available built up area with the institution was 6736 sq.ft. or 625.7 sq.mts. only as against the requirement of minimum of 1500 sq.mts. as per NCTE regulations. When the position was pointed out to the representatives of the DBHPS, as in case of other institutions run by them they informed that the Principal of the College inadvertently furnished wrong information regarding built up area to the SRC and the VT and that the actual built up area available exclusively for the B.Ed. course was 16200 sq.ft. i.e., 1550 sq.mts. They also stated that adequate labs, game and sports facilities were available as per the NCTE norms with the institution and the faculty members were qualified as per NCTE norms, as already indicated in their appeal and the records available could be verified. The Council also noted that the SRC issued the withdrawal order dated 02.08.2010 directly without issuing any showcause notice on the basis of the VTR, for making a representation by the institution as required under the provision of the NCTE Act. The Council therefore came to the conclusion that there was adequate justification in accepting the appeal with the direction to SRC for issuance of show cause notice and for further action thereafter.


The SRC in its 200th meeting held on 20-21 January 2011 considered the Appellate authority order dated 23.12.2010 VT report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to issue Show cause notice. Accordingly, Show cause notice was issued to the institution on 11.03.2011 for the following reasons:

1. As per VT Report and as countersigned by the Management, the total built-up-area of the building comes to 6736 sq.ft. which is far short of the NCTE

norms of 16,000 sq.ft.2. Language lab. is not available.3. Games and Sports facilities is not available. Corporation Ground is being used.4. As per VT Report and as countersigned by the Management, 2 staff members

do not possess requisite qualification as per NCTE norms.

Now, with the references to the above notice issued by SRC, NCTE dated 11.03.2011 the same was challenged before the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka in W.P.No. 13832-13837/2011 (EDN- RES). The Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka after considering the matter has ordered the Stay on all further proceedings by SRC. They have also submitted a copy of the order in W.P.No. 13832-13837/2011 dated 07.04.2011 of Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka.

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

20



The SRC in its 204th meeting held on 27-28 April, 2011 considered the above matter and decided to get the stay vacated.








Further, the advocate has opined that “In my opinion the writ petitions were premature and as issuance of showcause notices cannot be questioned in the normal course. The learned Single Judge is also not correct in directing the NCTE to decide the issue

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

21


whether NCTE has got supervision over petitioner institutions when the petitioner institutions are running the teacher training courses after obtaining recognition from NCTE. Further, NCTE Act prevails over all other Acts governing the field. Therefore, in my opinion this is a fit case for filing a Writ Appeal.”


The Committee considered the matter and decided to inform the Lawyer to file an Appeal against the Court order, by highlighting the grant of recognition by SRCNCTE, Bangalore to DBHS Lal Bahadur Shastri College of Education, 113/114, S.C. Road, Sheshadripuram, Bangalore, Karnataka for offering B.Ed (APS00156) course with an intake of 60 students from the session 2000-2001 vide order dt. 10.07.2000.

8. AOS00600/

APS00550

B.EdDBHPS

B asavesw

ara College

of Educatio

n, Mysore

KA

DBHPS Basaveswara College of Education, ‘Hindi Bhavan’ V.V. Road, K.R.Mohalla, Mysore – 570 004, Karnataka

DBHPS Basaveswara College of Education, ‘Hindi Bhavan’ V.V. Road, K.R.Mohalla, Mysore – 570 004, Karnataka was granted recognition by SRC for offering B.Ed. course with an intake of 60 students from the session 2000-2001 vide order dated 10.07.2000.



2. If NCTE will visit it will be proved through the attendance register, accounts register and how much money collected from the students. It is noticed Sabha people under the instruction of Mr. Neeral Katti collecting 40,000 Rs. And accounting only 20 and 15 thousand rupees. So this matter is very serious and visiting team may sent for investigation and remedy.



(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

22










The institution submitted its written representation on 30.03.2010. SRC in its 191st meeting held on 20-21 April 2010 considered the written representation submitted on 30.03.2010 and decided to cause inspection under section 17 of NCTE Act.


The SRC in its 193rd meeting held on 21-22 June, 2010 considered the VT report and decided to withdraw the recognition for the following reasons:- As per the VTR, and examination of other relevant documents, it was observed that

1. The built-up-area is only 4368.2 sq.ft., which is far short of the NCTE norms of 16,000 sq.ft.

2. Sports facilities, Games facilities are not available. 3. Library is having only 800 books related to Education, which are grossly

inadequate.

Under the above grounds, the Committee decides to withdraw the recognition for B.Ed. course with immediate effect. But, it is made clear that the institution is debarred from making any further admission subsequent to the date of issue of this order. The State Government/ affiliating University be informed accordingly.

Accordingly withdrawal order was issued to the institution on 27.09.2010.

Further, this office was in receipt of a copy of the complaint dated 23.11.2010 from aggrieved students which has been addressed to Sri.Kapil Sibal, Ministry of HRD, New Delhi regarding trade of marks cards and certificate in respect of Hindi Distance

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

23


Education.


The eligibility for taking such exams are as follows: 10+2+ Hindi Praveen of Equivalent Exam are eligible to take M.A.Exam 10+2+ Hindi Praveen /Equivalent +Shikshak Training are eligible to take even

M.Ed Exam.




Further, SRC, NCTE had not given any recognition to Hindi course run through Distance Education mode. The recognition accorded to 5 DBHPS institutions run in Karnataka has been withdrawn during 02.08.2010 for B.Ed course based on the complaint.


Aggrieved by the Withdrawal order, the institution preferred an appeal to NCTE, Hqrs and the appellant authority has noted that recognition was granted to the institution vide SRC’s order dated 10.7.2000. When, as per the NCTE regulations in vogue, no total minimum land and built up area required for B.Ed. course were not specifically laid down. Subsequently, after the NCTE Regulations, 2005, which came into force from 13.1.2006, through an amendment to the Regulations dated 20.07.2006, the minimum land and built up area required for B.Ed. course were prescribed as 2500 sq.mts and 1500 sq.mts. respectively. The Regulations, 2005 also prescribed that whenever there were changes in the norm, the recognized institutions should upgrade the facilities to conform to the revised norms before the commencement of the new academic session after the revised norms came into force. The latest NCTE Regulations, 2009, which came into force from August,2009 also specifically laid down that the institution, shall comply with the requirements laid down in the revised norms and standards immediately but not later than one year from the date of effect of the revised norms. However, the revised land area related norms shall not be applicable to the existing institutions if the same was not possible as per clause 8(13) of Regulations, 2009. But the required built up area shall have to be increased by them to conform to the revised norms, shall not be allowed to expand by way of additional courses or additional intake.

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

24


In the light of provisions in the NCTE regulations as amended from time to time, the institution was required to have a minimum built up area of 1500 sq.mtrs or 16146 sq.ft. for running a B.Ed. Course. The Council noted that in pursuance of a complaint received by the NCTE against the institution, the SRC in its 191st meeting held on 20-24 April, 2010, decided to get the institution inspected under Section 17 of the NCTE Act,1993 which has empowered the Regional Committees to withdraw recognition of such recognized institutions, which contravened provisions of NCTE Act/Rules/Regulations. It provides that where the Regional Committee is on its own motion or on any representation received from any person, satisfied that a recognized institution has contravened any of the provisions of the Act, or the rules, regulations, orders made or issued thereunder, or any condition subject to which recognition under Section 14 or permission under Section 15 was granted, it may withdraw recognition of such recognized institution for reasons to be recorded in writing. It is thus implied that while it is not mandatory for the Regional Committee in its discretion, decides to conduct an inspection. Accordingly, the SRC vide its letter dated 24.4.2010 asked the institution to furnish filled-in questionnaire along with requisite documents. The institution furnished the filled-in questionnaire along with requisite documents. The institution furnished the filled in questionnaire, affidavits etc. vide its letter dated 6.5.2010. In the filled in questionnaire, the institution indicated that the available land and built up area with the institution was 625.7 sq.mtrs or 6735 sq.ft. In the affidavit dated 4.5.2010 furnished by the institution, it indicated that the available land and built up area was 6736 sq.ft. each. The visiting team, which conducted the inspection under Section 17 of the NCTE Act, in its report dated 4.6.2010 indicated that the available land and area with the institution was 4910 sq.ft. and 4368.2 sq.ft.(excluding common area) respectively. Thus, the VT report dated 4.6.2010 also bear testimony to the claim made by the institution in the filled In questionnaire and affidavit dated 4.5.2010 that the available built up area with the institution was 6736 sq.ft. or 625.7 sq.mts. only as against the requirement of minimum of 1500 sq.mts. as per NCTE regulations.

When the position was pointed out to the representatives of the DBHPS, as in case of other institutions run by them they informed that the Principal of the College inadvertently furnished wrong information regarding built up area to the SRC and the VT and that the actual built up area available exclusively for the B.Ed. course was 16035 sq.ft. which could be verified. They also stated that it was a very old institution and the College was using the play ground of the nearby JSS College, which was permissible as per the earlier NCTE norms and standards. Regarding books in the library, the Council also noted that the SRC issued the withdrawal order dated 29.07.2010 directly without issuing any showcause notice on the basis of the VTR, for making a representation by the institution as required under the provision of the NCTE Act. The Council therefore came to the conclusion that there was adequate justification in accepting the appeal with the direction to SRC for issuance of show cause notice and for further action thereafter.

After perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT report and after considering the oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the council reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal and reverse the SRC’s order dated 27.9.2010 with the direction to the SRC for issuance of showcause notice and for further action thereafter.

Accordingly, the appeal was accepted and the order of the SRC dated 27.9.2010 reversed vide HQ order No.89-1010/2010-Appeal A29342 dated 23.12.2010.

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

25


The SRC in its 200th meeting held on 20-21 January 2011 considered the appellate authority order dated 23.12.2010. VT report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to issue show cause notice. Accordingly, Show cause notice was issued to the institution on 11.03.2011 for the following reasons:1. The built-up-area is only 4368.2 sq.ft., which is far short of the NCTE norms of

16,000 sq.ft.2. Sports facilities, Games facilities are not available. 3. Library is having only 800 books related to Education, which are grossly

inadequate.

Now, with the reference to the above notice issued by SRC, NCTE dated 11.03.2011 the same was challenged before the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka in W.P.No. 13832-13837/2011 (EDN- RES). The Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka after considering the matter has ordered the Stay on all furhter proceedings by SRC. They have also submitted a copy of the order in W.P.No. 13832-13837/2011 dated 07.04.2011 of Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka.








(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

26




Further, the advocate has opined that “In my opinion the writ petitions were premature and as issuance of showcause notices cannot be questioned in the normal course. The learned Single Judge is also not correct in directing the NCTE to decide the issue whether NCTE has got supervision over petitioner institutions when the petitioner institutions are running the teacher training courses after obtaining recognition from NCTE. Further, NCTE Act prevails over all other Acts governing the field. Therefore, in my opinion this is a fit case for filing a Writ Appeal.”


The Committee considered the matter and decided to inform the Lawyer to file an Appeal against the Court order, by highlighting the grant of recognition by SRCNCTE, Bangalore to DBHS Basaveswara College of Education, Hindi Bhavan, V.V. Road, K.R. Mohalla, MYSORE-570 004, Karnataka for offering B.Ed (AOS0600) & B.Ed (APS0550) course with an intake of 60 students from the session 2000-2001 vide order dt. 10.07.2000.

9. AOS00602/

APS00538

B.EdDBHPS Dr.B.D.

Jatti College

of Educatio

n, Belgau

m District

KA

DBHPS Dr.B.D. Jatti College of Education, Civil Hospital Road, Ayodhya Nagar, Belgaum – 590 001, Karnataka

DBHPS Dr.B.D. Jatti College of Education, Civil Hospital Road, Ayodhya Nagar, Belgaum – 590 001, Karnataka was granted recognition by SRC for offering B.Ed. course with an intake of 60 students from the session 2000-2001 vide order dated 10.07.2000.



2. If NCTE will visit it will be proved through the attendance register, accounts register

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

27


and how much money collected from the students. It is noticed Sabha people under he instructon of Mr. Neeral Katti collecting 40,000 Rs. And accounting only 20 and 15 thousand rupees. So this matter is very serious and visiting team may sent for investigation and remedy.












SRC in its 191st meeting held on 20-21 April 2010 considered the written representation submitted on 30.03.2010 and decided to cause inspection under section 17 of NCTE Act.


The SRC in its 193rd meeting held on 21-22 June, 2010 considered the Report and decided to withdraw recognition for B.Ed. course for the following reasons:-

As per VT Report and as countersigned by the institution, the total built-


28


up-area earmarked for the course is 8,109 sq.ft.; but on calculation, the total built–up–area comes to only 4976.43 sq.ft. It is far less than NCTE norms of 16,000 sq.ft. of built-up-area.

As per VT report and as countersigned by the institution, three teachers are not qualified as per NCTE norms.

As per VT report and as countersigned by the institution, the institution is in the habit of carrying forward the shortage of admissions(unfilled seats of previous years) to the next year and is admitting more than the stipulated intake of 100 in subsequent years as and when demand increases/comes. This unacademic/commercial practice is not acceptable as per the norms.

Under the above grounds, the Committee decides to withdraw the recognition for B.Ed. course with immediate effect. It was made clear that the institution is debarred from making any further admission subsequent to the date of issue of this order. The State Government/affiliating University be informed accordingly.

As per the decision of 193rd meeting of SRC, Withdrawal order was issued the institution on 02.08.2010.



The eligibility for taking such exams are as follows: 10+2+ Hindi Praveen of Equivalent Exam are eligible to take M.A.Exam 10+2+ Hindi Praveen /Equivalent +Shikshak Training are eligible to take

even M.Ed Exam.

Further, only Karnataka Government has given its recognition to these degrees for admissions only they are collecting very huge amounts around 50 to 60 thousands rupees from the students to the student and swindling the collected amount without any benefit to students. No classes, no lecturers and no practical classes are being held at any of the centres.The Secretary of the DBHPS, Chennai has issued a pamphlet stating that a sum of Rs.500/- per students will be paid to the pracharak who encourages the students to get admission to these courses and has requested to take action immediately to stop this fraud.The complainant had stated that last year the NCTE conducted investigation in Karnataka about the genuineness of marks cards and certificates issued by DBHPS and found so many loop holes. Such as the exams conducted elsewhere and where as the name of the centres mentioned in the marks cards and certificate are quite different.


(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

29




In the light of provisions in the NCTE regulations as amended from time to time, the institution was required to have a minimum built up area of 1500 sq.mtrs or 16146 sq.ft. for running a B.Ed. Course. The Council noted that in pursuance of a complaint received by the NCTE against the institution, the SRC in its 191st meeting held on 20-24 April, 2010, decided to get the institution inspected under Section 17 of the NCTE Act,1993 which has empowered the Regional Committees to withdraw recognition of such recognized institutions, which contravened provisions of NCTE Act/Rules/Regulations. It provides that where the Regional Committee is on its own motion or on any representation received from any person, satisfied that a recognized institution has contravened any of the provisions of the Act, or the rules, regulations, orders made or issued thereunder, or any condition subject to which recognition under Section 14 or permission under Section 15 was granted, it may withdraw recognition of such recognized institution for reasons to be recorded in writing. It is thus implied that while it is not mandatory for the Regional Committee in its discretion, decides to conduct an inspection. Accordingly, the SRC vide its letter dated 26.4.2010 asked the institution to furnish filled-in questionnaire along with requisite documents. The institution furnished the filled-in questionnaire along with requisite documents. The institution furnished the filled in questionnaire, affidavits etc. vide its letter dated 6.5.2010. In the filled in questionnaire, the institution indicated that the available land and built up area with the institution was 754.12 sq.mtrs or 8117 sq.ft. In the affidavit dated 4.5.2010 furnished by the institution, it indicated that the available land and built up area was 4895.48 sq.mts. and 754.12 sq.mtrs. or 8117 sq.ft. The visiting team, which conducted the inspection under Section 17 of the NCTE Act, in its report dated 1.6.2010 indicated that the available land and built up area with the institution was 4895.48 sq.mts and 754.12 sq.mts. (excluding common area) respectively. Thus, the VT report dated 1.6.2010 also bear testimony to the claim made by the institution in the filled in questionnaire and affidavit dated 4.5.2010 that the available built up area with the institution was 8117 sq.ft. or 754.12 sq.mts. only as against the requirement of minimum of 1500 sq.mts. as per NCTE regulations. When the position was pointed out to the representatives of the DBHPS, they informed the council that the Principal of

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

30


the College inadvertently furnished wrong information regarding built up area to the SRC and the VT and that the actual built up area available exclusively for the B.Ed. course was 17004 sq.ft. which could be verified. They also stated that adequate labs, game and sports facilities were available as per the NCTE norms with the institution and the faculty members were qualified as per NCTE norms, as already indicated in their appeal and the records available could be verified. The Council also noted that the SRC issued the withdrawal order dated 02.08.2010 directly without issuing any showcause notice on the basis of the VTR, for making a representation by the institution as required under the provision of the NCTE Act. The Council therefore came to the conclusion that there was adequate justification in accepting the appeal with the direction to SRC for issuance of show cause notice and for further action thereafter.


The institution had preferred an appeal to NCTE, Hqrs and the appellant authority has reversed the withdrawal order of SRC vide order dated 23.12.2010 with a direction to the SRC for issuance of show cause notice.

The SRC in its 200th meeting held on 20-21 January 2011 considered the Appellate authority order dated 23.12.2010 VT report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to issue Show cause notice. Accordingly, Show cause notice was issued to the institution on 11.03.2011 for the following reasons:1. As per VT Report and as countersigned by the institution, the total built-up-area

earmarked for the course is 8,109 sq.ft.; but on calculation, the total built–up–area comes to only 4976.43 sq.ft. Both are far less than NCTE norms of 16,000 sq.ft. of built-up-area.

2. As per VT report and as countersigned by the institution, three teachers are not qualified as per NCTE norms.

3. As per VT report and as countersigned by the institution, the institution is in the habit of carrying forward the shortage of admissions(unfilled seats of previous years) to the next year and is admitting more than the stipulated intake of 100 in subsequent years as and when demand increases/comes. This un-academic/commercial practice is not acceptable as per the norms.

Now, with the references to the above notice issued by SRC, NCTE dated 11.03.2011 the same was challenged before the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka in W.P.No. 13832-13837/2011 (EDN- RES). The Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka after considering the matter has ordered the Stay on all furhter proceedings by SRC. They have also submitted a copy of the order in W.P.No. 13832-13837/2011 dated 07.04.2011 of Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka.

Further, the institution has submitted its written representation on 04.03.2011 for the letter dated 10.02.2011, wherein the institution had stated that they have no remarks/comments to offer in this behalf as the letter does not have anything to complain against the college, it specifically mentions Hindi Distance Education, which is

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

31


not at all concerned with this college.










(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

32


This office has not yet received certified copy of the order from Hon’ble Court and not even from the institutions. Since the 1st respondent is the NCTE, New Delhi and the direction of Hon’ble Court is for 1st respondent to consider the above issue,

The Committee considered the matter and decided to inform the Lawyer to file an Appeal against the Court order, by highlighting the grant of recognition by SRCNCTE, Bangalore to DBHS Dr. B.D. Jatti College of Education, Civil Hospital Road, Ayodhya Nagar, Belgaum-590 001, Karnataka for offering B.Ed (AOS0602) & B.Ed (APS0538) course with an intake of 60 students from the session 2000-2001 vide order dt. 10.07.2000.

10. APS02158

D.EdSwamy Vivekan

anda D.Ed

College, Bidar

DistrictKA

Swamy Vivekananda D.Ed College , Bidar District, Karnataka

Swamy Vivekananda D.Ed College , Bidar District, Karnataka was granted recognition for offering D.Ed course on 31.01.2006 with an intake of 50 students.

The State Government of Karnataka in its letter addressed to Ministry of HRD, Government of India, New Delhi and NCTE had recommended withdrawal of recognition to some institutions in the state of Karnataka as the institutions are lacking infrastructural and instructional facilities and staff.

The matter was placed before SRC in its 134th meting held during 29th – 31st May and 1st June 2007.The Southern Regional Committee decided to cause inspection of the institutions, recommended for withdrawal of recognition by the State Government of Karnataka under section 17 OF NCTE ACT, 1993. To verify the veracity of the objections raised and also the facilities provided by the institutions as per norms and standards prescribed by NCTE.

Accordingly, an inspection team was constituted by the SRC-NCTE which visited the above institution on 14.06.2007.The inspection report was considered by SRC in its 138th meeting on 24th – 26th July 2007 and decided to issue notice. Notice was issued to the institution on 06.08.2007.

The institution submitted its written representation on 11.09.2007 in reply to notice. The SRC in its 146th meeting held on 25th – 27th October 2007 considered the written representation submitted by the institution and decided to withdraw recognition.

Accordingly, order of withdrawal of recognition was issued to the institution vide order dated 07.12.2007.

Further, the institution preferred an appeal before Appellate Authority ,NCTE, New Delhi under Section 18 of the NCTE Act. The Appellate Authority considered the appeal preferred by the institution and passed an order on 19.06.2008 confirming the rejection order of SRC.

The above institution does not fulfill the required norms and standards as prescribed by the NCTE. As such the recognition of the institution has been withdrawn by SRC-NCTE and also confirmed by the Appellate Authority.

The institution filed a Writ Petition in the High Court of Karnataka, Circuit Bench at Gulbarga, W.P.No. 40347/2008. This office received a notice dated 8.06.2009 from the

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

33


Hon’ble High court of Karnataka in W.P.No. 40437 of 2008 .A letter dated 06.07.2009 was sent to Advocate Sri.Ashok Haranahalli from this office with a brief history of the case to defend the case and protect the interest of NCTE and NCTE, New Delhi and appraise the Hon’ble court accordingly.

A Hqrs letter No. F.64-250/2012/NCTE/Legal/A59310 dated 07/11/2012 is received by this office on 13/11/2012 along with a copy of the Court order from the High Court of Karnataka, Circuit Bench of Gulbarga dated 18/07/2012 in W.P.No. 40347/2008[EDN-ADM] which is as under ;

“ Heard the arguments on both sides and perused the entire writ papers. It is seen from the record that before granting the permission to the petitioner-Educational Institution , the 4th respondent scrutinized the application submitted by the petitioner, documents and also report of the visiting team. It is only after conducting inspection, the permission was granted to the petitioner-Educational Institution as per Annexure-B. One of the conditions imposed in this order is that the petitioner-Educational Institution shall shift to their own premises within a period of three years .Even before lapse of this three years period, the 4th respondent passed the impugned order at Annexure-F within the span of 1 ½ years. Therefore, the impugned order at Annexure-F is contrary to the condition imposed. Before the Appellate Authority, the petitioner produced several documents in proof of purchasing their own property, construction building and improving infrastructure facilities. By a cryptic order the Appellate authority refused to consider the additional documents produced by the petitioner under the impugned order. Therefore, the impugned order is liable to be quashed.

Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that subsequent to passing of the impugned order at Annexure-F on 07/12/2007,the petitioners have not admitted the students. Further the material placed on record shows that the petitioner has now completed the construction of their own building and also purchased necessary furniture. In the light of these developments, the 4th respondent either by himself or through a visiting team to inspect the petitioner’s Educational Institution and to consider the petitioner’s claim for renewal of permission granted earlier in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible and in any event not later than three months from the date of receipt of this order.”

The SRC in its 235th meeting held on 21st – 22nd November 2012, considered the High Court of Karnataka, dated 18/07/2012 and all other relevant documents and decided to cause inspection under NCTE Act, to examine whether the institution fulfils all the requirements as per the norms, for the proposed programme, subject to the condition that the deficiencies, if any, were duly rectified by the institution, as per the norms and on receipt of payment of Rs. 50,000/- for inspection.

Accordingly, a letter to the institution vide F.SRO/APS0 2158/D.Ed/KA/47469 dated 29th

November 2012 was sent with a request to submit Rs. 50,000/- towards inspection fee in order to process the application further as per the orders of Hon’ble Court.

But the institution has not submitted any reply, so far.

The Committee considered the non-reply of the institution to this office vide letter dt. 29-11-2013 issued on the above matter and also the relevant documents of the institution and decided to withdraw recognition for the following reasons:-

The institution has not replied till now to the letter dt. 29-11-2012 of this office and also no-payment of Rs. 50000/- towards causing inspection as decided in

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

34


the 235th meeting held on 21-22nd Nov, 2012.

Based on the above points the committee decides to withdraw the recognition of the D.Ed course run by the Swamy Vivekananda D.Ed College, Bidar District, Karnataka from the academic year 2013-14 in order to enable the ongoing batch of students in D.Ed, course, if any, to complete their course.

But it is made clear that the institution is debarred from making any further admission subsequent to the date of issue of this order.

The Affiliating body / Examining board / body be informed accordingly.

Further decided to return Endowment funds and Reserve fund deposited with SRC NCTE, Bangalore, if any.

State Government Letter- Andhra Pradesh

11. Letter received

form Director SCERT, Andhra

Pradesh, Hyderabad

AP

This office is in receipt of a letter from Sri A. Satyanarayan Reddy, Director, SCERT, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, vide FAX letter Lr.Rc.No. 100/81/TE/SCERT/2013, dt. 15.5.2013.

Sub: SCERT, AP, Hyderabad, - SRCNCTE, Bangalore-Formal Recognition to the Pvt. D.Ed Colleges for the year 2013-14-certain information – submitted- Reg.

Ref: 1) NCTE ACT – 1993 2) G.O. Ms.No. 104.Edn, dt. 27-11-2007 3) Minutes of he Affiliation Committee meeting held on 03.05-2013.

I wish to submit that, SRC, NCTE, Bangalore is issuing formal recognition orders to the Pvt. D.Ed Colleges in the State of Andhra Pradesh for conducting D.E1.Ed4 course of two years duration with annual intake of 50 students under clause 7(11) of NCTE (Recognition Norms & Procedure Regulations, 2009 subject to fulfilment of certain conditions. After receipt of formal recognition orders, this office is constituting inspection teams to inspect the infrastructure facilities as per the Govt. of &Reorders vide ref. 2nd cited and on receipt of the proposals from the managements of Pvt. D.Ed. Colleges. After receipt of inspection report, the same are being placed in the Affiliation Committee to recommend to Govt., for grant of fresh affiliation for that particular academic year. The entire process will take 2 -43' months duration. The SRC, NCTE, Bangalore has issued more no. of formal recognition orders it., neatly 460 Pvt. D.Ed. Colleges upto October / November 1012 for the State of Andhra Pradesh in the year 2012-13. The process was continued upto February42013 and disturbing the D.Ed. Academic year 2012-13. Some of the management of Pvt. 'Md. Colleges have approached the Court for grant of affiliation for the year 201243 even though the Affiliation committee deferred to recommend, for grant of affiliation for the year 2012-13 due to short fall of no. of working days as per Nc-TE norms and standards 2009 and recommended for the year 201344. Certain Court cases are pending in the Hon’ble High Cowl for grant of affiliation for the year 2012-13 till date. Further, 1 wish to inform that, the Affiliation Committee in its meeting held on 3-5-2013 resolved to follow the MEd. Academic year schedule to regulate Did. admissions. The following are details:

Sl.No. Details Proposed Dates

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

35


1 Notification for conduct of D.Ed CET First week of April2 Conduct of D.Ed CET Last Week of April/First week of

May3 Commencement of first phase of

counsellingJune

4 Final Phase of Counselling Third Saturday of July5 Commencement of Course Third Monday of July6 Spot Admissions if any Fourth Saturday of July

The notification for D.Ed czar 2013 has already been itsued on 9-4-2013 for the year 2013-14. The date of examination of the Old. GET 2013 is 31-S-2013. Thereafter the process of the admissions into D.Ed Course will be continued through online.

I, therefore request you not to issue any formal recognition orders to Pvt. D.Ed Colleges for conducting D.El.Ed course for the year 2013-14 on or after 31-05-2013 due to conditions prevailing in the State of Andhra Pradesh.

The Committee has noted matter and decided to write to the SCERT Hyderabad that, already there is a formally notified ‘ban’ for D.Ed course in Andhra Pradesh for the session 2013-14. The Hon’ble Supreme Court order directs that after 3rd March 2013 no application can be cleared for 2013-14 academic session.

SCERT to note that their communications vide letter dt. 15.5.2013 requesting not to issue any formal recognition orders to Pvt. D.Ed colleges for conducting D.El.Ed course for the year 2013-14 on or after 31.05.2013 due to conditions prevailing in the State of Andhra Pradesh should be routed through the State Government.

New Application (2013-2014)

12. SRCAPP1783

B.EdAdhiyaman College of Education

for Women, Dharmapuri

DistrictTN

Srinivasa Educational Trust, Srinivasanagar Village, Uthangarai Post Office & Taluk, Dharmapuri District, Pin-635207, Talmilnadu had applied for grant of recognition to Adhiyaman College of Educaton for Women, Srinivasanagar Village, Uthanagarai Post Office & Taluk, Dharmapuri District, Pin-635207, Tamilnadu for B.Ed Course of one year duration under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online on 07.12.2012 and physical application has been received in the office of SRC on 10.12.2012.

The application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State Government for recommendation on 02.01.2013 followed by reminder on 14.03.2013. A deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 14.03.2013. Now, the institution has replied to the deficiency letter on 25.04.2013.

The Committee considered the reply of the institution dt.23-04-2012 to the deficiency letter and all other relevant documents, decided to cause inspection under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, to examine whether the institution fulfils all the requirements as per the norms for the proposed programme, subject to the condition that the deficiencies, if any, were duly rectified by the institution, as per the norms.

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

36


12 SRCAPP1933

B.EdOM College

of Education, Kanchipuram District

TN

OM College of Education, Plot/Khasara No. 160/2, 51 Nemili, AP Nagar Road, Valarpuram Post, Sriperumbudur Taluka and City, Kanchipuram District, Pin-602105, Tamilnadu

DK Nagarathi Educational Trust, Plot No. 16/4, Ragava Apts. Temple Avenue, Chennai Village, Saidapet Post, Chennai Taluka and District, Pin-600015, Tamilnadu had applied for grant of recognition to OM College of Education, Plot/Khasara No. 160/2, 51 Nemili, AP Nagar Road, Valarpuram Post, Sriperumbudur Taluka and City, Kanchipuram District, Pin-602105, Tamilnadu for B.Ed Course of one year duration under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online on 27.12.2012 and physical application has been received in the office of SRC on 28.12.2012.

The application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State Government for recommendation on 05.02.2013 followed by reminder on 19.03.2013. A deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 19.03.2013.

Now The institution has replied to the deficiency letter on 03.05.2013.

The Committee considered the reply of the institution dt.23-04-2012 to the deficiency letter, all other relevant documents and decided to cause inspection under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, to examine whether the institution fulfils all the requirements as per the norms, for the proposed programme, subject to the condition that the deficiencies, if any, were duly rectified by the institution, as per the norms.

Note: VT members to be informed to check in particular about other courses being run by the institution.

13 SRCAPP1823

B.Ed-AIArcot Sri

Mahalakshmi Womens College of Education,

Vellore District

TN

Arcot Sri Mahalakshmi Womens College of Education, Khasara No. 415/5, Plot No. 413/3A & B, Villapakkam Village and Post Office, Arcot City and Taluk, Vellore District – 632521, Tamilnadu.

Mahalakshmi Educational Trust, Arcot-Arni Main Road, Villapakkam Village, Arcot City and Taluk, Vellore District – 632521, Tamilnadu had applied for grant of recognition to Arcot Sri Mahalakshmi Womens College of Education, Khasara No. 415/5, Plot No. 413/3A & B, Villapakkam Village and Post Office, Arcot City and Taluk, Vellore District – 632521, Tamilnadu for B.Ed-AI Course of one year duration under Section 15(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online on 18.12.2012 and physical copy on 19.12.2012.

The application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State Government for recommendation on 02.01.2013 followed by reminder on 14.03.2013. A deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 14.03.2013. The institution has replied to the deficiency letter on 25.04.2013.

The matter was placed before SRC in its 243rd meeting held on 29th- 30th April 2013 and decided to Reject on the date of application three year gap after M.Ed-Al was not there.The institution vide its letter dt. 09.05.2013 has stated that “ we had not applied any Additional intake for the M.Ed., course. But NCTE Amendment regulation, 2010 in the Gazette of India on 26th July 2010. The amendment stipulates that the intake be increased form existing 25 to 35 students form the session 2010-11. This has been misunderstood by SRC, NCTE that we got recognition for M.Ed Additional Intake

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

37


and it has not completed 3 academic years, once again we request your good self that Arcot Mahalakshmi College has not granted any M.Ed Additional Intake and only got the enhancement of intake from 25 to 34 by NCTE. Hence we request your good office to kindly reconsider the decision of 243rd meeting of SRC, NCTE on 29th -30th April, 2013 decided to reject our application by stating the reason that “ on the date of application three year gap after M.Ed-AI was not there”.

The Committee considered the matter and decided that the decision of SRC in 243rd meeting held on 29-30th April, 2013 was erroneous. The matter is reconsidered , the case is reopened for further processing..

14 SRCAPP2043

B.P.EdBalaji

Institute of Physical

Education, Warangal

DistrictAP

Balaji Institute of Physical Education, Khasara No.64, 67, Plot No.64/1, 67/B/1, 67/C, 67/Aa, 67/Aa/2, Laknepally Village, Maheshwaram Post, Narsampet City, Andhra PradeshBalaji Educational Society, Plot No.1-1-71, Beside Pavani Nursing Home, Narsampet Village & Post Office, Narsampet Taluk, Warangal District-506132, Andhra Pradesh had applied for grant of recognition to Balaji Institute of Physical Education, Khasara No.64, 67, Plot No.64/1, 67/B/1, 67/C, 67/Aa, 67/Aa/2, Laknepally Village, Maheshwaram Post, Narsampet City, Andhra Pradesh for B.P.Ed Course of One year duration under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online on 29.09.2012 and physical application has been received in the office of SRC on 0+2.01.2013 .

The application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State Government for recommendation on 06.02.2013/14.03.2013 (Reminder). A deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 26.03.2013.

Now the institution has replied to the deficiency letter on 09.04.2013.

The committee considered the matter and noted that there are four cases 1) SRCAPP1707 2) SRCAPP1710 3) SRCAPP1714 & SRCAPP2043, all are interrelated to one another. The Societies have common address, common membership and common chairman, also it is observed that the building is same for all the courses.

Accordingly, the committee decided and advised Southern Regional Office to put up a composite note by giving details in a comparative deficiency letter tabular format & place in in the next SRC meeting.

15 SRCAPP169

B.P.EdSri Phulaji

Baba B.P.Ed College, Adilabad District

AP

Sri Phulaji Baba B.P.Ed College, Sy.No.222, Utnoor Village & Post Office, Utnoor City & Taluk, Adilabad District-504311, Andhra Pradesh

Sri Pandu Naik Educational Society, Plot No.1-36/1, Sevadas Nagar Street, Utnoor City & Post Office, Utnoor Taluk, Adilabad District-504311, Andhra Pradesh had applied for grant of recognition to Sri Phulaji Baba B.P.Ed College, Sy.No.222, Utnoor Village & Post Office, Utnoor City & Taluk, Adilabad District-504311, Andhra Pradesh for B.P.Ed Course of one year duration under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online on 31.12.2012 and physical application has been received in the office of SRC on 04.01.2013 .

The application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State Government for recommendation on 06.02.2013/26.03.2013(reminder). A deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 26.03.2013.

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

38



The reply of the institution to the Deficiency letter was duly considered and the reply is unconvincing and not satisfactory, deficiencies still persist as under: The same trust has submitted application in the name of Sri Pandu Naik for

seeking grant of recognition for D.El.Ed course during the year 2011. The application was processed and finally granted recognition on 29.08.2012. Hence institution has not completed three academic sessions.

As per NCTE Regulation 2009, 8(3) “an institution can apply for one basic unit only of an additional course or for an additional unit of the existing recognised course after completion of three academic sessions of the respective course, for which the institution shall submit application before the cut off date prescribed for submission of applications in the year succeeding the completion of three academic sessions”.

The Institution has submitted certified copy of registered land documents in favour of Ritesh Rathod, Secretary of Sri. Pandu Naik Educational Society. In land document highlighted that the property purchased for the name of Sri.Pandu Naik Educational Society. As per NCTE regulations 2009 title to land should not be in individual’s name.

The reply to the Deficiency letter is not satisfactory and unconvincing.

Under the above grounds and with reference to the totality of information collected & based on a collective application of mind, the committee decided as per NCTE Regulations 2009, to refuse and reject the application of the institution for recognition of B.P.Ed course.

16 SRCAPP2149

B.P.EdPapireddy

Gangireddy and

Chinnamma Memorial B.P.Ed College, Kadapa District

AP

Papireddy Gangireddy and Chinnamma Memorial B.P.Ed College, Plot No.20/1, K K Palli Village, Eguva Abbavaram Post Office, Rayachoty Taluk & City, Andhra Pradesh

Archana Vignan Educational Rural Development Society, Plot No.20/1, Katavakinda Papireddy Garipal Street, K K Palli Village, Eguva Abbavaram Post Office, Rayachoty Taluk & City, Kadapa District-516269, Andhra Pradesh had applied for grant of recognition to Papireddy Gangireddy and Chinnamma Memorial B.P.Ed College, Plot No.20/1, K K Palli Village, Eguva Abbavaram Post Office, Rayachoty Taluk & City, Andhra Pradesh for B.P.Ed Course of One year duration under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online on 31.12.2012 and physical application has been received in the office of SRC on 04.01.2013 .


The institution has replied to the deficiency letter on 07.05.2013.

The Committee considered the reply of the institution to the deficiency letter dt.07-05-2013 and all other relevant documents and decided to cause inspection under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, to examine whether the institution fulfils all the requirements as per the norms, for the proposed

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

39


programme, subject to the condition that the deficiencies, if any, were duly rectified by the institution, as per the norms.

Note: VT should be informed to check in particular details about other courses run by the institution, if any.

17 SRCAPP2133

B.P.EdSiddartha College of Physical

Education, Chittoor District

AP

Siddartha College of Physical Education, Plot No.134A, Khasara No.44, Chinthagunta Village, C Gollapalli Post Office, Chandragiri Taluk, Tirupati City, Chittoor District-517505, Andhra Pradesh

Siddartha Educational Academy, Plot No.134A, C Gollapalli Road, Chinthagunta Village, Chandragiri Taluk, Tirupati City, Chittoor District-517505, Andhra Pradesh had applied for grant of recognition to Siddartha College of Physical Education, Plot No.134A, Khasara No.44, Chinthagunta Village, C Gollapalli Post Office, Chandragiri Taluk, Tirupati City, Chittoor District-517505, Andhra Pradesh for B.P.Ed Course of one year duration under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online on 31.12.2012 and physical application has been received in the office of SRC on 04.01.2013 .

The application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State Government for recommendation on 31.01.2013/ 26.03.2013(reminder). A deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 26.03.2013.


The Committee considered the reply of the institution to the deficiency letter dt.03-05-2013 and all other relevant documents and decided to cause inspection under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, to examine whether the institution fulfils all the requirements as per the norms, for the proposed programme, subject to the condition that the deficiencies, if any, were duly rectified by the institution, as per the norms.

18 SRCAPP2090

B.P.EdSmt

Narayanamma College of Physical Education,

Kadapa District

AP

Smt Narayanamma College of Physical Education, Plot No.923, Street No.15, Plot No.923, Madukalavaripalli Village, Badvel Post Office, Gopavaram Taluk, Badvel City, Kadapa District-516227, Andhra Pradesh

Badvel and Siddout Higher Education Committee, Plot No.15, Surendra Nagar Street, Madukalavaripalli Village, Badvel Post Office & City, Gopavaram Taluk, Kadapa District-516227, Andhra Pradesh had applied for grant of recognition to Smt Narayanamma College of Physical Education, Plot No.923, Street No.15, Plot No.923, Madukalavaripalli Village, Badvel Post Office, Gopavaram Taluk, Badvel City, Kadapa District-516227, Andhra Pradesh for B.P.Ed Course of One year duration under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online on 30.12.2012 and physical application has been received in the office of SRC on 04.01.2013 .




40



Further, the institution should give the details about the completion of 3 academic sessions from the University and affiliating body for the courses D.Ed, H.P.T, B.Ed and M.Ed being run by the institution.

19 SRCAPP2142

B.P.EdLakshmi B

P Ed College,Chittoor District

AP

Lakshmi B P Ed College, Khasara No.62, Plot No.728/6, 728/7, 728/8, Patnam Village & Post Office, Thavanampalle Mandal, Chittoor City & District-517131, Andhra Pradesh

Society of Poor People for Agriculture Development and Education, Plot No.42/52-2, Bose Nagar Street, Rayachoty Village & Post Office, Rayachoty Taluk, Kadapa District-516269, Andhra Pradesh had applied for grant of recognition to Lakshmi B P Ed College, Khasara No.62, Plot No.728/6, 728/7, 728/8, Patnam Village & Post Office, Thavanampalle Mandal, Chittoor City & District-517131, Andhra Pradesh for B.P.Ed Course of One year duration under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online on 31.12.2012 and physical application has been received in the office of SRC on 04.01.2013 .




Note: VT should be informed to check in particular details about other courses run by the institution, if any.

Show Cause Notice Reply

20 SRCAPP637D.El.Ed

Amaravathi D.Ed College,

Guntur District

AP

Amaravathi D.Ed College, Plot No.111/1A, Guntur Road, Amaravathi Village and Post, Amaravathi City and Taluk, Guntur District-522020, Andhra Pradesh.

Amar Educational Society, Plot No.111/1A, Guntur Road, Amaravathi Village and Post, Amaravathi City and Taluk, Guntur District-522020, Andhra Pradesh had applied for grant of recognition to Amaravathi D.Ed College, Plot No.111/1A, Guntur Road, Amaravathi Village and Post, Amaravathi City and

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

41


Taluk, Guntur District-522020, Andhra Pradesh for D.El.Ed Course of two years duration under section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online on 23.09.2011 and physical application had received in the office of Southern Regional Committee on 26.09.2011.


The institution has not submitted reply for deficiency letter within the stipulated time of 60 days and till date.

As per sub-clause (1) of Clause 7 of NCTE Regulation 2009, the applicant institutions is required to submit deficiencies to the Southern Regional Committee Office Within 60 days from the date of receipt of communication of deficiencies, failing which the application will be treated as rejected and closed, no extension to time will be granted and any submission received after 60 days will be treated as invalid and not entertained.

The SRC in its 221st meeting held on 19th-20th April 2012, considered the matter, as the institution has not submitted reply for deficiency letter even after stipulated period of 60 days from the date of issue of deficiency letter and with reference to the totality of information collected & based on a collective application of mind, the committee decided as per clause 7(1) of NCTE Regulations 2009, to refuse and reject the application of the institution for recognition of D.El.Ed course.Accordingly, a rejection order was issued to the institution vide No.F.No.SRCAPP637/D.El.Ed/AP/2012-13/ dated 30.05.2012.The institution has submitted a Court order along with the documents / reply for deviciency letter dt. 20.12.2011. Submitted Hon’ble court W.P.No.26800 of 2012 dated 10.10.2012 order as follows:-“Respondent is directed to consider petitioner’s application already made at least for the academic year 2013-14. If respondent No.2 finds any deficiencies, it shall immediately issue notice to the petitioners and consider the reply, if any sent by the latter and take a decision on permitting the petitioners to commence course from the academic year 2013-14”.The SRC in its 235th Meeting held on 20th – 21st November 2012, considered the Court Order and decided to process.

In obedience to the Court direction, the application was processed and placed before SRC in its 236th meeting held on 16-18th December, 2012. The Committee decided to cause inspection under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, to examine whether the institution fulfils all the requirements as per the norms, for the proposed programme, subject to the condition that the deficiencies, if any, were duly rectified by the institution, as per the norms, subject to submission of latest encumbrance certificate.The inspection of the institution was fixed between 10-15th February 2013. The same was intimated to the institution on 08.01.2013. The inspection was conducted on 31.01.2013. The VT report was received by SRC on 15.02.2013.The SRC in its 241st Meeting held on 29th – 31st March and 1st April, 2013 considered the VT report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under Section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, for the following:

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

42


1) FDRs submitted have expired on 20.09.2012, The institution has to submit revalidated FDRS.

2) As per VT report, total built up area is 13186 sq.ft. only. Which is not tallying with total built up area as shown for Building plan & building completion certificate (1662.34 sq.mts=17787 sq.ft).

Before the issue of Show Cause Notice, the institution referring to the minutes of 241st Meeting uploaded in the website of SRC, NCTE has submitted its written representation on 25.04.2013

On careful perusal of the original file of the institution, reply of the institution, all relevant documents and other related documents, Act of NCTE, 1993, Regulations and guidelines of NCTE published from time to time laid on the table, the Regional Committee decided to issue Letter of Intent for grant of recognition to D.El.Ed course of two year duration with an annual intake of 50(Fifty only)(one unit) subject to the appointment of qualified staff through duly constituted selection committee as per the Norms of NCTE/State Government/Affiliating University and be given effect before the commencement of the academic session.

21 SRCAPP1707D.El.Ed-AI

Maheshwara Institute of Elementary

Teacher Education, Warangal

DistrictAP

Maheshwara Institute of Elementary Teacher Education, Khasara No. 61, Laknepally Village &Street, Narsampet Taluka & City, Warangal-506331, Andhra Pradesh.

Maheshwara Educational Society, Plot No. 1-1-71, Beside Pavani Nursing Home Strret, Narsampet Village & Post Office, Warangal-506132, Andhra Pradesh had applied for grant of recognition to Maheshwara Institute of Elementary Teacher Education, Khasara No. 61, Laknepally village &Street, Narsampet Taluka & City, Warangal-506331, Andhra Pradesh for D.El.Ed-A.I Course of two years duration under Section 15 (1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online on 1/10/2011 and physical application has been received in the office of SRC on 17/10/2011.

The application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State Government for recommendation on 08/11/2011 followed by reminder on 26/12/2011. A deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 30/12/2011. The institution has submitted written representation to the deficiency letter on 21/02/2012.

The SRC in its 219th Meeting held on 15th – 16th March, 2012 considered the reply of the institution vide letter dt. 21.02.2012 and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under Section 14(1) of NCTE Act.

Accordingly, a Show Cause Notice was issued to the institution on 04.04.2012. The institution has submitted its written representation on 03.05.2012.

The institution has submitted reply for Show Cause Notice after the stipulated time of 21 days period.

The Southern Regional Committee in its 222nd meeting held on 9th – 10th May , 2012 considered the reply of the institution to the show cause notice which is

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

43


received on 03/05/2012, i.e., after 29 (Twenty nine) days from the date of issue of show cause notice dt. 04-04-2012 and with reference to the totality of information collected & based on a collective application of mind, the committee decided as per of NCTE Regulations 2009, to refuse and reject the application of the institution for recognition of D.El.Ed course.

Accordingly, a rejection order was issued to the institution on 15.06.2012.

Aggrieved by the rejection order of SRC the institution preferred an appeal to NCTE-Hqrs and the appellate authority in its order no. F.No.89-329/2012 Appeal/5th Meeting-2012 dated 17/08/2012 states that “the council concluded that there was adequate ground to remand the case to SRC with a direction to consider the appellant’s reply to the show cause notice and take a fresh decision in the matter.”

In pursuance to the Appellate authority order dated 17.08.2012, the application was processed and placed before SRC in its 233rd Meeting held on 26th-28th

September, 2012 and the committee considered the matter along with all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under section 14(1) of NCTE Act.

Accordingly, show cause notice was issued to the institution on 01/11/2012. The institution has submitted written representation on 05/11/2012.

The SRC in its 235th Meeting held on 21st-22nd November, 2012 considered the written reply and other relevant documents and decided to cause composite inspection for B.Ed, D.Ed and D.Ed – Al along with SRCAPP1710-D.El.Ed-Al course at the premises Under Section 15 (1)of NCTE Act, to examine whether the institution fulfils all the requirements as per the norms, for the proposed programme, subject to the condition that the deficiencies, if any, were duly rectified by the institution, as per the norms and on payment of Rs. 50000/- for each course towards inspection fee.

Accordingly, inspection of the institution was fixed between 10th-13th December, 2012 the same was intimated to the institution on 03/12/2012. The inspection of the institution was conducted on 11/12/2012.

Note:- it is observed that as per application SRCAPP 1707 & 1710 the location of the building is same. (except sy.no) i.e. Laknepally Village, Narsampet Mandal, Warangal District. The signature of the chairman in the building plan is same for both the colleges. (The society name is different and the address of the both the society is one and the same).

The SRC in its 239th Meeting held on 26th-27th February, 2013 considered VT report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under section 14 of NCTE Act.

Accordingly, a show cause notice was issued to the institution on 10/04/2013. The institution has submitted written representation on 29/04/2013.

The committee considered the matter and noted that there are four cases 1)


44


SRCAPP1707 2) SRCAPP1710 3) SRCAPP1714 & SRCAPP2043, all are interrelated to one another. The Societies have common address, common membership and common chairman; also it is observed that the building is same for all the courses.

Accordingly, the committee decided and advised Southern Regional Office to put up a composite note by giving details in a comparative deficiency letter tabular format in the next SRC meeting.

22 SRCAPP975D.El.EdChenna Keshava

College of Education, Rangareddi

DistrictAP

Chenna Keshava College of Education, Plot No. 43/AA, Burugupally Village, Vikarabad Post and Taluk, Rangareddi District – 501101, Andhra Pradesh.

Sri Chenna Keshava Educational Society, Plot No. 4-5-2, Alibagh Street, Vikarabad Post and Taluk, Rangareddi District - 501101, Andhra Pradesh had applied for grant of recognition to Chenna Keshava College of Education, Plot No. 43/AA, Burugupally Village, Vikarabad Post and Taluk, Rangareddi District – 501101, Andhra Pradesh for D.El.Ed Course of two years duration under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online on 29.09.2011 and physical application has been received in the office of SRC on 03.10.2011.

The application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State Government for recommendation on 18.10.2011/ 15.12.2012 (Reminder). A deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 30.12.2011. The institution has not submitted reply to the deficiency letter even after stipulated period of 60 days.As per sub-clause (1) of Clause 7 of NCTE Regulation 2009, the applicant institution is required to submit deficiencies to the Southern Regional Committee Office within 60 days from the date of receipt of communication of deficiencies, failing which the application will be treated as rejected and closed, no extension to time will be granted and any submission received after 60 days will be treated as invalid and not entertained.The SRC in its 221st meeting held on 19th – 20th April 2012 considered the matter as the institution has not submitted reply for deficiency letter even after stipulated period of 60 days from the date of issue of deficiency letter and with reference to the totality of information collected & based on a collective application of mind, the committee decided as per clause 7 (1) of NCTE Regulations 2009, to refuse and reject the application of the institution for recognition of D.El.Ed course.Accordingly, a rejection order was issued to the institution vide no. F.No. SRCAPP975/D.El.Ed/AP/2012-13/41888 dated 30.05.2012.The 335/2012 Appeal/8th Meeting- 2012 dated 18.09.2012 has stated as follows:

“ the Council conclude that there was adequate ground to remand the case to the SRC with a direction to process the application and to take the further decision thereafter.

The council hereby remands back the case of Chenna Keshava College of Education, Plot No. 43/AA, Burugupally Village, Vikarabad Post and Taluk, Rangareddi District – 501101, Andhra Pradesh to the SRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above”.

In obedience to the Appellate authority order dated 24.09.2012, the SRC in its 233rd meeting held on 26th –28th September 2012 decided to process & put up the application.

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

45


Accordingly, the application is being processedThe SRC in its 234th Meeting held on 17th – 18th October 2012, considered the reply of the institution vide letter dt. 24.09.2012 to the deficiency letter and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under NCTE Act, for the following:

1) In the building plan submitted, Sy.No. and land area & built up area is not mentioned.

2) In the building completion certificate and land usage certificate sy.No. 43/A/2 & 43/A/1 is mentioned, which are not tallying with land document, building plan submitted.

3) Notarised land usage certificate from the Revenue divisional office stating that the agriculture land converted to non-agriculture for the educational purpose is not submitted.

4) Original Up-to-date encumbrance certificate issued by sub-registrar is not submitted.

5) The management is running “Srinivasa Pharmaceutical Institute” in the same building/premises where the proposed course is located, which is not permissible as per NCTE norms.

Accordingly Show Cause Notice was issued to the institution on 19.11.2012.Now the institution has submitted its written representation dt. 20.11.2012 received in the office of SRC on 21.11.2012 as follows:.

The SRC in its 236th meeting held on 16-18th December 2012 considered the reply of the institution dt.21.11.2012 and all other relevant documents and decided to cause inspection under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, to examine whether the institution fulfils all the requirements as per the norms, for the proposed programme, subject to the condition that the deficiencies, if any, were duly rectified by the institution, as per the norms.

The inspection of the institution was fixed between 15-19th January 2013. The same was intimated to the institution on 08.01.2013. The inspection was conducted on 17.01.2013. The VT report was received by SRC on 21.01.2013.

The SRC in it 241st meeting held on 30-31st April 2013 considered the VT report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under Section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, for the following:

The Institution has not submitted Re-validated FDRs, since the FDRs of Rs. 5 lacs and 3 lacs expired on 28.09.2012 & 28.09.2012 respectively.

As per Land document, mentioned Sy.No. 43/Telugu letters, but in Building plan, Building completion certificate, Land usage certificate, the Sy.Nos are given as 43/A/1 and 43/A/2, which needs clarification from the institution.

Notarised land usage certificate from the Revenue divisional office stating that the agriculture land converted to non-agriculture for the educational purpose is not submitted. Proceedings of Revenue Divisional Officer not submitted for conversion of land from agricultural to educational purposes. The institution has submitted for Commercial purpose not for Educational purpose.

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

46


In the meanwhile, the institution has submitted in its written representation on 08.05.2013 (with reference to website minutes of 241st meeting of SRC).

The reply of the institution with reference to the website minutes of 241st

meeting of SRC was duly considered and the reply is unconvincing and not satisfactory, deficiencies still persist as under:

The Sy.Nos. are discrepant in land documents and other documents submitted. As per Land document, mentioned Sy.No. 43/Telugu letters, but in Building plan, Building completion certificate, Land usage certificate, the Sy.Nos are given as 43/A/1 and 43/A/2.

The institution has submitted land usage certificate dt. 23.11.2006 with Sy.No. 43/AA, whereas another land usage certificate dt. 06.05.2013 reflects Sy.No. 43/A/1 & 43/A/2.

Land usage certificate specifies only ‘commercial’ use and not for ‘educational purpose’.

The reply to the Deficiency letter is not satisfactory and unconvincing.

Under the above grounds and with reference to the totality of information collected & based on a collective application of mind, the committee decided as per NCTE Regulations 2009, to refuse and reject the application of the institution for recognition of D.Ed. course.

23 SRCAPP1633

D.El.EdSiddhartha Institute of Teacher

Education, Kadapa District

AP

Siddhartha Institute of Teacher Education, Plot/Khasara No. 562, 512/2A, Talla Proddatur Village & Post, Kondapuram City and Taluk, Kadapa District -516474, Andhra Pradesh

Sri P.C. Nagireddy Educational Society, Plot No. 5/148, Regadi Palle Road, Talla Proddatur Village & Post, Kondapuram Taluk, YSR District, Kadapa District- 516474, Andhra Pradesh had applied for grant of recognition to Siddhartha Institute of Teacher Education, Plot/Khasara No. 562, 512/2A, Talla Proddatur Village & Post, Kondapuram City and Taluk, Kadapa District -516474, Andhra Pradesh for D.EL.Ed Course of two years duration under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online on 01.10.2011 and physical copy received on 07.10.2011.

The application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State Government for recommendation on 03.11.2011/ 22.12.2011. A deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 30.12.2011. The institution has replied to the deficiency letter on 28.02.12

The SRC in its 220th Meeting of SRC held on 30th – 31st March, 2012 considered the reply of the institution dt. 28.02.2102 and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under Section 14(1) of NCTE Act.

Accordingly, a Show Cause Notice was issued to the institution on 27.04.2012. The institution has submitted written representation on 22.05.2012.

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

47


The institution has submitted reply for Show Cause Notice after the expiry of stipulated time of 21 days period.

The Southern Regional Committee in its 223rd meeting held on 29th -31st May 2012, considered the reply of the institution, which is received on 22/05/2012, i.e., after 25 (Twenty Five) days from the date of issue of show cause notice dt. 27/04/2012 and with reference to the totality of information collected & based on a collective application of mind, the committee decided as per NCTE Regulations 2009, to refuse and reject the application of the institution for recognition of D.El.Ed course.

Accordingly, a rejection order was issued to the institution on 27/06/2012.

Aggrieved by the rejection order of SRC the institution preferred an appeal to NCTE-Hqrs and the appellate authority in its order no. F.No.89-375/2012 Appeal/8th Meeting-2012 dated 05.09.2012 states that ‘the council concluded that there was adequate ground to remand the case to SRC for consideration of Show Cause Notice Reply and taking further action.’

In obedience to the Appellate Authority order dated 05.09.2012, the application was processed and placed before SRC in its 233rd Meeting held on 26th-28th

September 2012, the committee considered the matter and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act.

Accordingly, a show cause notice was issued to the institution on 30/10/2012. The institution has submitted written representation on 09/11/2012.

The SRC in its 236th meeting held on 16th-18th December 2012, considered the reply of the institution dt.09-11-2012 and all other relevant documents and decided to cause inspection under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, to examine whether the institution fulfils all the requirements as per the norms, for the proposed programme, subject to the condition that the deficiencies, if any, were duly rectified by the institution, as per the norms.

The inspection of the institution was fixed between 15 th -19th January 2013. The same was intimated to institution on 08.01.2013. The inspection was conducted on 19.01.2013. The VT report was received by SRC on 22.01.2013.

The SRC in its 241st meeting held on 29th-31st March & 1st April 2013, considered the VT report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under Section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, for the following:

The Institution has not submitted Re-validated FDRs, since the FDRs of Rs. 5 lacs and 3 lacs expired on 29.09.2012 & 29.09.2012 respectively.

As per VT report, Language learning lab is not available. The institution has to submit proof of Language learning lab availability.

As per VT report, seating capacity in the library is only 32. The institution has to increase the seating capacity in the library as per NCTE norms.

Before issuance of show cause notice, the institution has submitted its written representation on 03.05.2013 (with reference to online minutes).

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

48


The Committee considered the reply of the institution vide letter dt. 03.05.2013 and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under section 14(1) of NCTE Act, for the following:

The institution is directed to submit fresh VCD covering front full view of the building, infrastructure & instructional facilities provided to the course being proposed.

In view of the above and with reference to the totality of information collected & based on a collective application of mind, the Committee decided to issue a Show cause Notice to the institution as to why the recognition be not refused and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 21 days from the date of receipt of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the refusal & rejection of application for recognition, based on the records available, with no further notice. Note: Further, the committee advised Southern Regional Office to take action against VT members for scrappy VT report.

24 APS01865B.Ed

Acharya College of Education, Bangalore

KA

Acharya College of Education, 89 & 90, Soladevana Halli, Hesaraghatta Main Road, Chikkabanavara Post, Bangalore-560090, Karnataka

Acharya College of Education, 89 & 90, Soladevana Halli, Hesaraghatta Main Road, Chikkabanavara Post, Bangalore-560090, Karnataka was granted recognition for offering B.Ed course of 100 students vide order dafted 30.11.2004 wFith a condition to shift to its own premises/building within 3 years from the date of recognition.

The institution vide letter dated 05.10.2007 had submitted a proposal for shifting of premises along with Rs.40,000/- towards shifting fee. The inspection was carried out on 25.11.2010.

The SRC in 199th meeting held on 22nd – 23rd December 2010 considered the VT report and VCD and all the relevant documentary and decided to issue Show Cause Notice. Accordingly, a Show Cause Notice was issued to the institution on 02.02.2011. The institution submitted its written representation on 08.03.2011.

The SRC in its 203rd meeting held on 31st March & 1st April 2011 considered the written representation and decided to cause re-inspection under Section 17 of NCTE Act. The re-inspection was carried out on 23.04.2011.

The SRC in its 205th meeting held on 18th-19th May 2011 considered the VT report and other documents and decided to issue Show Cause notice. Accordingly, a Show Cause Notice was issued to the institution on 15.06.2011. The institution submitted its written representation on 15.07.2011.The SRC in its 210th meeting held on 22nd – 23rd August, 2011 considered the reply of the institution, VT Report and all the relevant documentary evidences and decided to serve Final Show cause Notice, which was issued on 10.10.2011. The institution vide its letter dated 21.12.2011 submitted its reply to the Final Show Cause Notice.

The SRC in its 216th meeting held on 11th and 12th January, 2012 considered the

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

49


written reply of the institution vide letter dated 21.12.2011 and also the relevant documents of the institution and noted that the deficiencies still persists and decided to withdraw recognition of the institution for B.Ed. course for the following reasons:-

The certified copy of the Land is in the name of the institution is not submitted. As per norms, land must be in the name of the institution.

The latest Building Completion Certificate from the authorized competent Government Engineer is not submitted.

Land Usage Certificate from the concerned Government authorities stating that the land is exclusively permitted/ sanctioned for Educational Purposes is to be submitted.

The Building completion certificate submitted is not in the name of the College. The total built up area as per BCC is 40409.65 sq. ft. The utility of the remaining 24429 sq.ft is not explained; implying that the management is running some other courses not related to teacher education programme, which is not permissible as per NCTE norms.

Non-Encumbrance certificate in respect of Sy.No.91, from the competent authority is not submitted.

Language learning lab is not available.

Accordingly, withdrawal order was issued to the institution vide No. APS01865-B.Ed./KA/2011-2012/39214 dated 14.03.2012.

Aggrieved by the withdrawal order, the institution preferred an appeal on 3.5.2012. The Council noted that (a) the appellant institution was granted recognition for B.Ed. course by the SRC vide order dated 30-11-2004 with a condition to shift to own premises/building within 3 years from the date of recognition; (b) the appellant submitted a proposal on 05-10-2007 to the SRC for shifting of premises; (c) SRC caused inspection of new premises on 25-11-2010 and a re-inspection on 23-04-2011. After issuing show cause notice it withdrew recognition of the institution for B.Ed course on the grounds as stated in para 1 above.

The Council further noted that (a) the second visiting team in their report dated 23-04-2011 observed that the institution was having adequate land, built-up area and other instructional facilities as per NCTE course; 19,700 Sq.ft. of built-up area was earmarked for B.Ed. course and the remaining area was shown for proposed D.Ed. and M.Ed. programmes; No other programme/course was being run in the name of appellant society; (b) With regard to withdrawal grounds it was observed that sale deed executed was in favour of the society; CLU issued by Deputy Commissioner, Building Completion Certificate issued by Asstt. Engineer and Panchayat Development Officer, Non-encumbrance Certificate issued by Sub-Registrar Officer were acceptable; the building at present was exclusively meant for B.Ed. course; and the language learning lab was adequately equipped.

In view of the submission made by the appellant and the documents submitted in support and VT observations, the Council concluded that there was adequate justification to accept the appeal with a direction to the SRC for re-consideration of the matter for restoration of the recognition to the institution.

After perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT reports and after considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal with a direction to the SRC for re-consideration of the matter for restoration of the

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

50


recognition to the institution.The Council vide order No. F.No.89-226/2012 Appeal/6th Meeting-2012 dated 17/07/2012 remands back the case to the SRC, NCTE for necessary action as indicated above.

The committee in its 230th meeting held on 16-17 July, 2012 considered the Appellate authority order dt. 17/07/2012 and decided to process the application of the institution further.

It is observed from the file, that the land and other documents produced before the appeal committee for Sy.No.91 only whereas earlier, the land documents were submitted for Sy.No.89 and 90.

The certified copy of the land is still not available in the file.

The Southern Regional Committee in its 233rd Meeting held on 26th – 28th

September 2012 considered the Appellate authority order dt.17/07/2012 and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under NCTE Act.

Accordingly ,a show cause notice was issued to the institution on 09.11.2012. The institution submitted its written representation on 09.11.2012 based on information in the website.

From the records it is observed that :

A bank statement from State Bank of India dated 21/09/2010 stating that it is holding the following title deeds as a security for the credit facilities availed by M/s.JMJ Education Society, Bangalore is submitted.( Page No. 278)

1) Equitable Mortgage of land and building belonging to the society situated on Sy.No 80.90 and 91 at Soladevanahalli, Bangalore north Taluk measuring 10 acres and 3 guntas.

2) Equitable Mortgage of land measuring 5 acres situated at Sy.No.13 , Sasuvegatta ,Bangalore North Taluk, belonging to Smt.Shalini Reddy

3) Equitable Mortgage of land and building belonging to society situated at No.11-27-55 at Vasavi Colony, Warrangal (A.P) measuring 1036 sq.yards.

Encumbrance Certificates dated 24/11/2011 (page no.602)says the properties in Sy.No. 90 and 89 is free from Encumbrances for a period of 01/04/2004 to 24/11/2011 .

No document regarding the release of the above mentioned documents from State Bank of India with respect to the mortgage is found in the file.

The SRC in its 237th meeting held on 5-6th January, 2013 considered the reply of the institution vide letter dt. 09/11/2012 and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Final Show cause Notice under NCTE Act, for the following:

Inspection for shifting premises on 23/04/2011 was conducted at Sy. No. 89 & 90 and not at Sy.No.91.

The Institution/Society has submitted BCC, Affidavit and Building Plan for

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

51


Sy.No.91 only and not for Sy. Nos 89 & 90. Land documents submitted is in the name of Society. Land documents in the name of institution is not submitted.

As per the Bangalore University staff list dated 28/02/2012,the appointment of one Principal and 3 lecturers are approved. As per NCTE norms, for offering B.Ed course , 1 Principal and 7 lecturers should be appointed.

From the records it is observed that :

A bank statement from State Bank of India dated 21/09/2010 stating that it is holding the following title deeds as a security for the credit facilities availed by M/s.JMJ Education Society, Bangalore is submitted.( Page No. 278)

1) Equitable Mortgage of land and building belonging to the society situated on Sy.No 80, 90 and 91 at Soladevanahalli, Bangalore north Taluk measuring 10 acres and 3 guntas.

2) Equitable Mortgage of land measuring 5 acres situated at Sy.No.13 , Sasuvegatta ,Bangalore North Taluk, belonging to Smt.Shalini Reddy.

3) Equitable Mortgage of land and building belonging to society situated at No.11-27-55 at Vasavi Colony, Warrangal (A.P) measuring 1036 sq.yards.

4) Encumbrance Certificates dated 24/11/2011 (page no.602)says the properties in Sy.No. 90 and 89 is free from Encumbrances for a period of 01/04/2004 to 24/11/2011 .

5) No document regarding the release of the above mentioned documents from State Bank of India with respect to the mortgage is not submitted by the institution.

Accordingly, a final show cause notice was issued to the institution on….. and the institution has replied vide letter dt.

The committee considered the reply of the institution and decided to reject the proposal of the institution for shifting vide their letter dt. 05.10.2007.

Further the Committee considered the written reply of the institution on the above matter and also the relevant documents of the institution and decided to withdraw recognition for the following reasons:-

The VT inspection of the institution was conducted at Sy.Nos. 89 & 90 for shifting of the premises. The institution was well aware of the fact that the shifting inspection is proposed and informed to the institution regarding shifting inspection at the new premises. The claim of the institution that it has erroneously presented land documents for Sy.No. 89 & 90 can not be acceptable. The new premises is at Sy.No. 91 is for inspection should have been shown to the VT members and the management has kept silent while the inspection was taking place at Sy.No. 89 & 90.

Blue print of the building plan for B.Ed course for Sy.No. 91 is not submitted.

Original building completion certificate from competent Govt. engineer is not submitted.

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

52


Duly approved staff list from the University towards B.Ed course is not submitted.

The institution in their reply dt 03.04.2013 agreed that the land document is with Bank as collateral Security. As seen from the land document submitted by the institution, where in it is mentioned as a part of the factory is sold to the society for developing the said manufacturing factory. Thereafter the land of 5 acres & 1 guntas has been converted for educational purpose on 25.02.2003. As per NCTE regulations 2009, the land and building should be free from all kind of encumbrances.

Based on the above points the committee decides to withdraw the recognition of the B.Ed course run by the Acharya College of Education, 89 & 90, Soladevana Halli, Hesaraghatta Main Road, Chikkabanavara Post, Bangalore-560 090, Karnataka from the academic year 2013-14, in order to enable the ongoing batch of students in B.Ed, course, if any, to complete their course.


The Affiliating body / Examining board / body be informed accordingly. Further decided to return Endowment funds and Reserve fund deposited with SRC NCTE, Bangalore, if any.

25 APS08831B.Ed

S.V.S. College of Education,

Tumkur District

KA

S.V.S College of Education, No. 410, Opp. Banashankari Street Temple, Kunigal Road, Tumkur District-572101, Karnataka had submitted an application for starting B.Ed course on 31.12.2007. The institution was granted recognition on 02.01.2008 with an annual intake of 100 students.

This office is in receipt of letter No.TY:VCPS:2011-12:98 dated 21.05.2011 from the Vice-Chancellor, Tumkur University, Tumkur by enclosing a list of 19 institutions with the Committee observations by conducting inspections.

The SRC in its 206th meeting held on 9-10th June, 2011 considered the VT report, reply of the institution vide its letter dt. 21.05.2011 and the deficiencies in the 19 institutions in Tumkur District and decided to issue show cause notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act which was issued to the institution on 11.07.2011. The institution had replied vide letter dt. 11.8.2011.

The Committee in its 211th meeting held on 21-23 September, 2011 considered the letter dated 21.05.2011 from Vice-Chancellor, Tumkur University pointing out deficiencies in the 19 Tumkur University colleges and also reply of the above institution dt. 11.08.2011 and other documents submitted by the institution and decided to cause composite inspection for all the courses at premises Under Section 17 of NCTE Act, to verify whether the institution is maintaining instructional and infrastructural facilities as per NCTE norms. The institution was directed to submit certain documents within 30 days of the receipt of the notice, with Demand Draft of Rs.40,000/- inspection fee towards the all the courses being run, in favour of “The Member Secretary, NCTE” payable at Bangalore.

Further, inspection of the institution of institution was scheduled between 28th October, 2011 to 2nd November, 2011 and the same was informed to the institution on

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

53


19.10.2011.

In the meanwhile, Tumkur University vides their letter received on 17.10.2011 had conducted visits to the institution during 15th – 19th and 27th of July, 2011 and has made the following observations:-

Action taken by the College

Observations during First Visit Action taken by the College

1. No. Multipurpose hall2. No science laboratory, 3. No Audio-visual equipments4. Library books are not according to NCTE

norms.5. Consolidated salary for staff members 6. S.R. not maintained.

1. multipurpose hall provided 2. Science equipments are

available-the college should provide Sc. Lab, exclusively for B.E d.

3. TV, OHP, VCR, Audio system provided 4. library books are available-no

separate library for B.Ed.

5. Consolidated salary for staff members paid by cash

6. S.R. opened but entries not updated

As scheduled, the visiting team comprising of Dr. K.P. Suresh, Director, school of Pedagogical Sciences, Kannur University, Kannur, Kerala and Mr. Bhaskar Rao, Lecturer, PRR College of Education, Eluru, W.G., Dt. Andhra Pradesh visited the institution on 28.10.2011 and noted that the institution was not ready for inspection and that the institution had requested for postponement vide their letter dated 26.10.2011 addressed to the Regional Director, SRC, NCTE.

In the meanwhile, the President of the institution vide letter dated 26.10.2011, received by this office on 27.10.2011 had requested to postpone the date of inspection since he is not in a position to attend the inspection team as he met with an accident on 24.10.2011 and his left leg at knee is fractured when he met accident with auto and at the time of operation a rod was fixed and again the Doctor has advised for an operation when sugar is completely normalized. A Medical Certificate from the Doctor dated 24.10.2011 is enclosed as proof.

The SRC in its 216th meeting held on 11th – 12th January 2012 has considered the matter and institutions letter dt. 27.10.2011 & all relevant documents and decided to cause inspection under Section 17 of NCTE Act to examine whether the institution fulfils all the requirements as per the norms, for the proposed programme, subject to the condition that the deficiencies, if any, were duly rectified by the institution, as per the norms & in anticipation of Rs. 40000/- towards inspection fee. Accordingly, an inspection was scheduled to the institution between 6th February, 2012 to 13th February, 2012 and the institution was informed about the schedule of inspection vide this office letter dated 24.01.2012. Visiting team comprising of Dr. R. Binoy, Govt. College of Teacher Education, Thycaud, Trivandrum, Kerala and Dr.G. Subramaniam, Sri. Ramakrishna Mission, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu was deputed to visit the institution as per schedule during 6th to 13th February, 2012.

But, since inspection report was not received by the VT members, letters were

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

54


addressed to the VT members on 13.6.2012. The VT members vide their letters received by this office on 18.6.2012 and 6.7.2012 informed that they had made an attempt to visit the institution, but the Management of the College gave a reply that “We are not ready for inspection and already sent a request to NCTE,SRC in this regard.” It was also informed that they are not willing to undergo the inspection in the specified time and have informed to SRC.

It is noted from the file, that the institution on 25.1.2012 had requested for conduct of inspection during second and third week of March, since the entire process of shifting will be completed.

The SRC in its 228th meeting held on 24th – 25th July, 2012 considered the reply of the institution dt.25-01-2012 and all other relevant documents and decided to cause inspection under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, to examine whether the institution fulfils all the requirements as per the norms, for the proposed programme, subject to the condition that the deficiencies, if any, were duly rectified by the institution, as per the norms. Accordingly, as per the decision of SRC, an inspection on the institution carried on 10.03.2012.

The institution had submitted a D.D. No. 118031 dated 25/01/2012 of State Bank of Mysore of Rs. 40,000/- towards Inspection fee. Now another D.D.No. 119236 dated 14/07/2012 of State Bank of Mysore for Rs.10,000/- is submitted towards Inspection Fee along with the V.T. Report. The D.D is already expired and hence a letter is addressed to the institution on 29/11/2012 to submit a revalidated D.D of Rs.10,000/-

The SRC in its 237th meeting held on 5th -6th January 2013 considered the VT report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under NCTE Act, for the following:-

1. Original Certified land documents are not submitted.2. Original Notarized affidavit is not submitted.3. As per the copy of the Building plan, the proposed coursed is not mentioned in the

Building plan. Site area of 1842.70 sq. mtrs. is less as per NCTE norms. 4. Original blue print of the building plan is not submitted.5. M.P. hall of 1232 sq.ft. is not as per NCTE norms. As per NCTE norms M.P. Hall of

area of 2000 sq.ft. is required for offering B.Ed. course.6. Original/Notarized building completion certificate is not submitted. Type of roofing is

also not mentioned.7. Date of inspection is left blank in Building Completion Certificate.8. Copy of LUC is submitted. Original Notarized LUC is not submitted.9. Copy of Non-Encumbrance Certificate is Submitted. Original/Notarized Non-

Encumbrance certificate is not submitted.10. Original FDRs in joint account is not Submitted for Rs.5 lakhs and Rs. 3 lakhs.11. Staff list approved by Tumkur University is not submitted.12. Lecturer(s) in Foundation Course is not identified.13. Lecturer(s) in Fine Arts/Physical Education is not appointed.14. Original staff profile along with Annexure I II & III is not submitted.

Accordingly, Notice was issued to the institution on 08.03.2013. The Institution submitted reply vide letter dated 01.04.2013

The Committee considered the written reply of the institution on the above

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

55


matter and also the relevant documents of the institution and decided to withdraw recognition for the following reasons:-

The institution has submitted 30 years Lease- cum- Ownership documents. As per the Original Certified land Document dated 17/11/2004 submitted, the lease is for 30 years in the name of President K.H. Paramashivaiah, S.V.S. institute of Management, Health & Scientific Studies, at Sy.no. 66/1,1b,3b Having 126X150+170/2, ft and Sy. No. 7/2a,2b,2b2 having 135+95/2X116 for Construction of Hostel for TCH students.

Hence, the Land is not in the name of the institution/Trust, but it is in the name of President K.H. Paramashivaiah, S.V.S. institute of Management, Health & Scientific studies. As per NCTE regulations, 2009 the land and building should be in the name of the institution.

The land is leased by Tumkur Urban Development Authority for construction of Hostel for TCH Students. But in the Building plan submitted which is in individual name and meant for the construction of College of Education (B.Ed course).

The institution has submitted Notarized copy issue of building completion certificate by Joint Director, Tumkur urban Development Authority. Building Completion Certificate is in individual name which is not permissible as per NCTE regulations 2009, Building Completion Certificate is in Individual name.

The institution has not submitted in original FDR’s.

Staff list approved by the Tumkur University is not submitted. Copy of the affiliation for 2012-2013 is submitted.

Based on the above points the committee decides to withdraw the recognition of the B.Ed course run by the S.V.S College of Education, No.410, Banashankari Street Temple, Kunigal Road, Tumkur District-572101, Karnataka from the academic year 2013-14, in order to enable the ongoing batch of students in B.Ed, course, if any, to complete their course.



26 APS06049B.Ed

St.Aloysius Institute of Education, Mangalore

KA

St. Aloysius Institute of Education, P.B.No.720, Kudumal Ranga Rao Road, Kodiyalbail, Mangalore-560003, Karnataka.

Mangalore Jesuit Educational Society, Mangalore, Karnataka has submitted an application to the SRC, NCTE for grant of recognition to St. Aloysius Institute of Education, P.B.No.720, Kudumal Ranga Rao Road, Kodiyalbail, Mangalore-560003, Karnataka and was granted recognition on 30.03.2007 for B.Ed. course of one year duration with an annual intake of 100 students with a condition to shift to its own premises/building within three years from the date of recognition (if started

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

56


in rented premises).

The Secretary, MJES vide letter dated 8.8.2012 received by this office on 10.08.2012 has requested permission for shifting of the B.Ed. course to a new building. The Secretary has submitted a Demand Draft No. 002525 dated 7.8.2012 of Central Bank of India for Rs.50,000/- .

The SRC in its 232nd meeting held on 29th t`o 31st August 2012 has considered the reply of the institution dt.08.08.2012 and all other relevant documents and decided to cause composite inspection for shifting of premises under NCTE Act, to examine whether the institution fulfils all the requirements as per the norms, for the proposed programme, subject to the condition that the deficiencies, if any, were duly rectified by the institution, as per the norms.

As per direction of SRC the inspection of the institution is carried on 19.10.2012.

The SRC in its 237th meeting held on 5th – 6th January 2013 considered the VT report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under NCTE Act.

Accordingly, a Show Cause notice was issued on 06.03.2013. The institution submitted a written representation on 01.04.2013

The committee considered the reply of the institution and decided to reject the proposal of the institution for shifting vide their letter dt. 08.08.2012.

Further the Committee considered the written reply of the institution vide their letter dt. 01.04.2013 on the above matter and also the relevant documents of the institution and decided to withdraw recognition for the following reasons:-

As per Sale Deed the name of the Society is Karnataka Jesuit Educational Society whereas as per recognition order , the Society name is Mangalore Jesuit Educational Society. As per NCTE regulations, 2009, the land and building should be registered in the name of the Society/Trust/institution.

In the reply, to the M.P.hall having 1530 sq.ft instead of 2000 sq.ft. as per regulations, the institution has submitted a photocopy of the building plan of St. Aloysius Higher Primary school at Sy. No/ 210/P2 RS.No.269. From the documents submitted, it is observed that B.Ed College is offered in a building where many other courses are offered. As per NCTE regulations 2009, the Teacher Education Course shall not be allowed to have any other institution, within its demarcated area or building and shall not have any other courses in the building.

Building completion certificate approved by Government Engineer in the prescribed format is not submitted.

Staff list approved by the Mangalore University is submitted by the College. The year & date of approval is not mentioned in the Mangalore

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

57


University staff list. As per the staff available, only One Principal and 6 lecturers are available. As per NCTE regulations, 2009, One Principal and 7 lecturers should be appointed as per NCTE regulations, 2009 for offering B.Ed. course.

Lecturer in Fine Arts is not approved by Mangalore University.

Based on the above points the committee decides to withdraw the recognition of the B.Ed course run by theSt. Aloysius Institute of Education, P.B.No. 720, Kudumal Ranga Rao Road, Kodiyalbail, Mangalore-560 003, Karnataka from the academic year 2013-14, in order to enable the ongoing batch of students in B.Ed, course, if any, to complete their course.



27 APS02269B.Ed

Shridevi College of Education,

Tumkur District

KA

Shridevi College of Education, shivadeepti 3rd corss, Someshwara Extension, Maralenahally Tumkur District-572216, Karnataka

Shridevi College of Education, shivadeepti 3rd corss, Someshwara Extension, Maralenahally Tumkur District-572216, Karnataka was granted recognition on 31.11.2004 with an intake of 100 students with the condition to shift to its own premises within 3 years.

This office is in receipt of letter No.TY:VCPS:2011-12:98 dated 21.05.2011 from the Vice-Chancellor, Tumkur University, Tumkur by enclosing a list of 19 institutions with the committee observations by conducting inspections.

The SRC in its 206th meeting held on 9-10th June, 2011 noted the inspection report of the Vice-Chancellor, Tumkur University, dt. 21.05.2011 and the deficiencies in the 19 institutions in Tumkur District and decided to issue show cause notice under section 17 of NCTE Act. Accordingly, a show cause notice was issued to the institution on 07.07.2011 for the following deficiencies:-

1. No. Multipurpose hall2. No independent science laboratory, ICT, Computer lab3. No Audio-visual equipments4. Educational Journals are not subscribed to the library as per NCTE norms5. No reading room facility6. S.R. not maintained7. Consolidated salary for staff members

The Committee in its 211th meeting held on 21-23 September, 2011 considered the letter dt.21.05.2011 from Vice-Chancellor, Tumkur University pointing out deficiencies in the 19 Tumkur University colleges and also reply of the above institution dt. 07.07.2011 and other documents submitted by the institution and decided to cause composite inspection for all the courses at premises Under Section 17 of NCTE Act, to verify whether the institution is maintaining instructional

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

58


and infrastructural facilities as per NCTE norms. The institution is directed to submit the following within 30 days of the receipt of the notice, with Demand Draft of Rs.40,000/- inspection fee towards the all the courses being run, in favour of “The Member Secretary, NCTE” payable at Bangalore.

Accordingly, the inspection of the institution was carried out on 31.10.2011.

In the meanwhile, Tumkur University vide their letter received on 17.10.2011 has conducted visits to the institution during 15-19 and 27th of July, 2011

The SRC in its 223rd meeting held on 29th – 31st May 2012 has considered the reply of the institution vide letter dt. 26.05.2012 and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Final Show cause Notice under NCTE Act.Accordingly show cause notice was issued to the institution on 25.06.2012.The institution submitted its written representation on 27.07.2012 for the following deficiencies:-

1. The institution has submitted four sale deed land documents, which are in individual’s name, which is not permissible as per NCTE Regulations 2009.

2. Approved blue print of the building plan issued by competent civil authority is not submitted.

3. Original building completion certificate from competent Govt. authorized engineer is not submitted.

4. Original FDRs for Rs. 5 & 3 lacs towards endowment and reserve fund from a Nationalised Bank in Joint account is not submitted.

5. Scale of pay to the staff offered is not as per Central/State.Govt. /UGC Guidelines.

6. Staff list is not approved by the Affiliating Unviersity, Tumkur.


The SRC in its 237th meeting held on 5th-6th January 2013 considered the reply of the institution vide letter dt. 27/07/2012 and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Final Show cause Notice under NCTE Act.

Accordingly, a final Show cause notice was issued on 16.02.2013. The institution submitted a written representation on 05.04.2013.

The Committee considered the written reply of the institution on the above matter and also the relevant documents of the institution and decided to withdraw recognition for the following reasons:-

The College has not submitted the building plan for 2nd & 3rd floor. As seen from the colored Xerox of blue print of the building plan the building is for the construction of college and not for Sridevi College of Education.As per NCTE regulations, 2009, the teacher education building should have a well demarcated area and shall not have any other institution within its demarcated area or building & shall not have any other institution within its demarcated area or building & shall not have any other courses in its building.

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

59


Only ground and 1st floor is available & II & III floor is not available as mentioned in the building completion certificate dt. 16.07.2001. Hence total building area as per building plan is 2057.44, which is less than the requirement of 2000 sq.mtrs of built up area for offering both B.Ed & D.Ed (APS02143) courses. Earmarked built up area in building plan and building completion certificate is not matching.

The institution has not submitted duly approved staff list from the University.

A copy of the letter dated 04/08/2008 is submitted by the institution issued by the District Registration and commissioner stamps, Tumkur commissioner stamps, Tumkur District, stating that “Hence is a provision to transfer the Founder’s Trustee’s land to the schedule to the Karnataka stamp Act,1957. As per the notarized copy of the land documents submitted, it is observed that the land is not in the name of institution/ society trust, but it is in individual name which is not as per NCTE regulations. As per NCTE regulations 2009, the land & building should be in the name of the institution.

Based on the above points the committee decides to withdraw the recognition of the B.Ed course run by the Shridevi College of Education, Shivadeepti 3rd Cross, Someshwara Extension, Maralenahally Tumkur District – 572 216, Karnataka from the academic year 2013-14, in order to enable the ongoing batch of students in B.Ed, course, if any, to complete their course.



Further, the committee advised Southern Regional Office to process and resubmit the D.Ed (APS02143) course case in the 247th meeting.

28 APS05395B.Ed

Kamaraj College of Education, Cuddalore

DistrictTN

Kamaraj College of Education, No. 70, Vengan Street, Chidambaram, Cuddalore District, Pin-6080001, Tamilnadu

Kamaraj College of Education, No. 70, Vengan Street, Chidambaram, Cuddalore District, Pin-6080001, Tamilnadu had submitted an application for B.Ed Course on 30.12.2005. The institution was granted recognition on 23.12.2006 with an annual intake of 100 students, with the condition to shift to own premises within 3 years.

SRC in its 181st meeting held on 20th-21st August, 2009 where in it was decided that the institution which have not shifted to the permanent premises even after the expiry of three years time limit be issued notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act for further action. Accordingly, notice was issued to the institution on 11.09.2009. The institution vide its letter dated 28.09.2009 stated that the college owns its building from the commencement of college and we declare that it is not rental. The building is our own and permanent.

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

60


A complaint has been received from Thiru K. Devarajan, M.A, M.Ed, Director of Matriculation Schools, Chennai-600006, Tamilnadu stating as follows:-

“I would like to bring to your kind attention, that one B.Ed college in the name of Kamaraj College of Education (Women) is functioning in the first floor of Kamaraj Matriculation Higher Secondary School in 70 Vengan Street, Chidambaram, Cuddalore District of Tamilnadu. When this matter was first reported by the inspector of Matriculation Schools, Cuddalore, Director of Matriculation Schools has sent a notice the management about the functioning of college of education in the building of matriculation school. The correspondent wrote a letter dated 14.2.2001 to this Directorate stating that no such college of education is functioning within the campus of Kamaraj Matriculation Higher Secondary School.

Hence another inspector of Matriculation Schools, Thanjavur District was asked to verify the facts and sent a report. In his letter Rc.No.192/A1/2011 dated 10.03.2011 sent a detailed report along with photographs stating that a college of education is functioning in the first floor of the matriculation school and confirmed the report of the inspector of matriculation school, Cuddalore.

I hope NCTE rules do not permit the functioning of either Teacher Training Institute or B.Ed College of Education in the premises of other institutions. Hence I request you to take necessary action in this regard.

Photographs and copy of the reports of inspector of Matriculation Schools, Cuddalore and Thanjavur are enclosed”.

On the basis of complaint, a show cause notice was issued to the institution on 27.05.2011. The institution had submitted its reply on 29.06.2011.

The SRC in its 211th meeting held on 21st-23rd September, 2011 has considered the written reply and all other relevant documents and decided to cause re-inspection at the premises under NCTE Act. The institution is directed to submit inspection fee of Rs. 40,000/-. Accordingly, the inspection of the institution was conducted on 16.02.2012. The institution has not submitted the inspection fee for Rs. 40,000/-

The SRC in its 224th meeting held on 14th-17th June 2012 has considered the VTR, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice. Accordingly, Show cause notice was issued to the institution on 06.07.2012. The institution submitted its reply on 27.07.2012.

The SRC in its 233rd meeting held on 26th-28th September, 2012 has considered the reply of the institution vide letter dated 27.07.2012 and all the relevant documentary evidences and decided to serve Final Show Cause Notice under NCTE Act. Accordingly, a Show cause notice was issued to the institution on 30.10.2012. The institution had submitted its written representation on 17.10.2012.

The SRC in its 237th meeting held on 05th–06th January of 2013 considered the written representation of the institution vide letter dt. 17.10.2012 and all the relevant documentary evidences and decided to serve Show cause Notice under NCTE Act. Accordingly, Show Cause notice was issued to the institution on

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

61


16.02.2013. The institution has submitted written representation on 11.03.2013.

The Committee considered the written reply of the institution on the above matter and also the relevant documents of the institution and decided to withdraw recognition for the following reasons:-

Building Completion Certificate is not approved by competent Govt. Engineer.

The institution has not submitted approved staff list from the affiliating

body/ University.

Based on the above points the committee decides to withdraw the recognition of the B.Ed course run by the Kamaraj College of Education, No. 70, Vengan Street, Chidambaram, Cuddalore District,-608 001, Tamilnadu, from the academic year 2013-14, in order to enable the ongoing batch of students in B.Ed, course, if any, to complete their course.



29 APS05218B.Ed

Sri Raja Rajeshwari College of Education,

Vellore District

TN

Sri Raja Rajeshwari College of Education, V.G.M. Nagar, Ammoor Road, Walajapet-632513, Vellore District, Tamilnadu.

Sri Raja Rajeshwari College of Education, V.G.M. Nagar, Ammoor Road, Walajapet-632513, Vellore District, Tamilnadu had submitted an application for B.Ed Course on 02.01.2006. The institution was granted recognition on 26.10.2006 with an annual intake of 100 students, with the condition to shift to own premises within 3 years.

The institution in its letter dated 02.09.2010 stated as follows

“ I wish to submit that we launched our institution with the sole intention of including B.Ed Programme to the poor and village students at a very nominal fees and we have succeeded in achieving the same for the past 3 years, since our institution is located in a very remote village, the construction of the pucca building could not be completed within the prescribed time limitation. The construction is going on and we will inform you as soon as the construction work is completed”.

The institution has been inspected at Walajapet, Vellore District and granted recognition at Walajapet address where the institution entered a lease agreement of only three years as per lease deed dated 22.11.2005. The institution has also submitted another lease deed dated 17.10.2005 which is for 40 years but the address in this lease deed as per schedule of lease deed is Vellore District, Arakkonam Registration District, Arcot Taluk, Chakkarmallur Village.

Hence the institution, as per recognition order dated 26.10.2006 was supposed to shift to its own premises/building within 3 years from the date of recognition.

The SRC in its 196th meeting held on 15th-16th September, 2010 decided to issue


62


show cause notice to the institution. Accordingly notice was issued to the institution on 26.10.2010.

The institution vide letter 26.11.2010 stated as follows:

“We started the B.Ed programme in the leased out building at the time of launching the same Subsequently the entire building along with another building was transferred in favor of our Trust on 16.09.2008 itself by way of a settlement deed. Thus the entire building under lease became the own property of the Trust. A Xerox copy of the same is enclosed herewith for your perusal. The total extent of the building available is 125sq.ft. Thus we are running the institution in the premises only.

Further I submit that to facilitate more amenities and infrastructures to the students we are now constructing a modern building in a vast area in the land situated at Chakramallur Village, Arcot Taluk. This land has been taken on lease for 40 years and we have already submitted the relevant document to you. Through we started to work 1 year age, due to the labors problem we could not complete the building in time. Now the work is going on very speedily and the same is about to be completed in 2 months time.

I undertake to shift the entire institution within a period of 2 months.

Hence I request you to grant me 2 months time only for shifting to the new building”.

The SRC in its 199th meeting held on 22nd-23rd December, 2011 considered the request and decided to cause inspection of the institution in Feb 2011; if the institution is not ready for inspection with completion of building, further action will be taken with no further notice.

The inspection of the institution was fixed between 14th-18th March, 2011. The same was intimated to the institution on 03.03.2011. The inspection of the institution is not yet conducted.

The institution vide its letter dated 09.04.2012 has submitted DD bearing no. 588976 dated. 31.03.2012 for Rs. 40,000/- towards processing fees for shifting of premises.

The SRC in its 223rd meeting held on 29th-31st May 2012 considered the written reply and other relevant documents submitted by the institution and decided to cause Shifting inspection at the new premises and to ascertain infrastructural and instructional facilities Under NCTE Act. Accordingly, inspection of the institution was conducted on 16.06.2012.

The SRC in its 229th meeting held on 30th-31st July,2012 considered the VT report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and decided to serve Show Cause Notice under NCTE Act. Accordingly, a Show cause notice was issued to the institution on 24.08.2012. The institution had submitted its written representation on 05.10.2012.

The SRC in its 236th meeting held on 16th -18th December, 2012 considered the reply of the institution vide letter dt. 05.10.2012 and all the relevant documentary

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

63


evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under NCTE Act. Accordingly, a Show Cause Notice was issued to the institution on 05.02.2013. The institution had submitted its written representation on 22.02.2013 and 12.03.2013.

The committee considered the Institution’s letter vide letter dt. 26.11.2010 & 09.04.2012 and decided to reject the proposal of the institution for shifting.

Further, the Committee considered the written reply of the institution vide their letter dt. 22.02.2013 & 12.03.2013 to the show cause notice issued to the institution on the above matter and also the relevant documents of the institution and decided to withdraw recognition for the following reasons:-

The institution has not submitted the duly approved staff list from the University.

Based on the above points the committee decides to withdraw the recognition of the B.Ed course run by the Sri Raja Rajeshwari College of Education, V.G.M. Nagar, Ammoor Road, Walajapet-632 513, Vellore District, Tamilnadu, from the academic year 2013-14, in order to enable the ongoing batch of students in B.Ed, course, if any, to complete their course.



Other Items

30 APS00508D.P.EdSanjay D.P.Ed College, Bidar DistrictKA

Sanjay D.P.Ed College, Gunahalli Road, Shahapur Village, Pin-585401, Bidar District, Karnataka

Sanjay D.P.Ed College, Gunahalli Road, Shahapur Village, Bidar District-585401, Karnataka had submitted an application for seeking grant of recognition for offering D.P.Ed course on 23.12.1996.

The application was processed and the institution was granted recognition on 21.8.2000.The State Government of Karnataka in its letter addressed to Ministry of HRD, Government of India, New Delhi and NCTE has recommended withdrawal of some institutions in the State of Karnataka as the institutions are lacking infrastructural, instructional facilities and staff.

The matter was placed before SRC in its 134 th meeting of SRC held during 29th to 31st May and 1st June, 2007 and the committee decided to cause inspection of the institutions recommended for withdrawal of recognition by State Government of Karnataka under Section 17 of NCTE Act. Accordingly, inspection was carried out on 18.10.2007.

The inspection report was received and placed before SRC in its 161st meeting held on 6th and 7th August, 2007.The Committee considered the visiting report,

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

64


VCD and other related documents and decided to issue show cause notice for the following deficiencies and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of this show cause notice

The Management has not responded to inspection team.

The building in which the D.P.Ed course was functioning is closed.

The D.P.Ed college is not functioning in the same address.

The management running Nightingale Nursing School in the same building.

Accordingly, show cause notice was issued to the institution on 26.8.2008.

The institution did not care to respond to the notice dated 26.8.2008, even after lapse of two and half years.

Hence, the matter was placed before SRC in its 201st meeting held on 22nd and 23rd February, 2011.

The Committee considered the non-reply to the notice and it was decided to serve final show cause notice under section 17 of NCTE Act for the following;

The Management has not responded to inspection team.

The building in which the D.P.Ed course was functioning is closed.

The D.P.Ed college is not functioning in the same address.

The management is running Nightingale Nursing School in the same building.

Accordingly, final show cause notice was issued to the institution on 23.3.2011.

The institution submitted a written representation on 11.4.2011, which was placed before SRC in its 204th meeting held on 27th and 28th April, 2011. The Committee considered written representation of the institution and decided to cause inspection under Section 17 of NCTE Act.

Accordingly, inspection letter was issued to the institution on 22.7.2011 intimating the date of inspection.

The inspection could not be carried out instead a letter dated 28.7.2011 has been submitted by the VT members stated as follows; “the members of the inspection team contacted over phone the management of Sanjay D.P.Ed college(APS00508), Bidar, KA communicating the schedule of visit to the college. In response, the management responded through SMS on 27.7.2011 that “the president of the college has been hospitalized for treatment of Kidney dialysis. So postpone the inspection for two months.”A telegram dated 27.7.2011 has been received from the institution stated that the President of the college has been hospitalized and it has requested for postpone the inspection for two months.

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

65


The SRC in its 210th meeting held on 22nd – 23rd August 2011 considered the institution’s reply by telegram dt. 27.07.2011 on the above matter and also the relevant documents of the institution and decided to withdraw recognition for the following reasons:-

The management has repeatedly requested for postponement of the inspection of the institution and non-response for four years to the show cause notice issued and for giving unsatisfactory/unconvincing reasons for repeated postponement of inspections.

The protracted non-response to the show cause notice and non-co-operation for the inspection by NCTE, go to prove that all is not well with the institution. Having given the adequate time/opportunity the NCTE, SRC has to withdraw the recognition.

Based on the above points the committee decided to withdraw the recognition of the D.P.Ed course run by the Sanjay D.P.Ed Gunahalli Road, Shahapur Village, Pin-585401, Bidar District, Karnataka, from the academic year 2013-14, in order to enable the ongoing batch of students in D.P.Ed, course, if any, to complete their course.

Accordingly, a withdrawal order was issued to the institution on 14/11/2011.

It was made clear that the institution was debarred from making any further admission subsequent to the date of issue of order.

Withdrawal order was sent to the institution twice and was returned back.

Now ,a letter dated 27/02/2012 from the Director, D.S.E.RT was received by this office on 12/03/2013 which is as under ;

“ I am directed to send a report regarding permission to restart Sanjay College of Physical Education. As per your office letter F.KR/C.P.Ed/ 38/SRO/NCTE /2004-2005 dated 05/04/2005, the institution is permitted to conduct the course of one year duration upto 2005 only. Thereafter the course has to be switched over to two years as per NCTE. The institution has stated that it had stopped functioning since there were no admissions from the years 2006-2007 to 2011-2012 and has made a request to the State Government to grant permission to restart the college from the academic session 2012-2013.I I request you to inform us whether the institution will be permitted to start the course in case you have received a proposal from the institution for restarting the college from the academic session 2012-2013 .”

This office has not received any proposal from the institution for starting of D.P.Ed course.

The Committee considered the matter and clarification sought from the Director, DSERT, Karnataka. It is decided that the Director DSERT, Karnataka, to be informed that no case is pending with respect to ‘Sanjay Bidar College, Bidar District’, regarding revival of recognition of the said college.

Consideration of Agenda Items- Volume-02

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

66


Court Cases

31 AOS0598 / APS00546

B.EdDBHPS Rajiv

Gandhi College of Education, Dharwad District

KA

DBHPS Rajiv Gandhi College of Education, D.C. Compound, Dharwad – 580001, KarnatakaDBHPS Rajiv Gandhi College of Education, D.C. Compound, Dharwad – 580001, Karnataka was granted recognition by SRC for offering B.Ed. course with an intake of 60 students from the session 2000-2001 vide order dated 10.07.2000.

A Complaint was received on 18.11.2009 from the Secretary, Hindi Prachar Mandali, Bijapur, Karnataka addressed to the Chairperson, NCTE, New Delhi regarding misappropriation of funds and Mal-administration of DBHPS institutions in Karnataka. The Complaint was forwarded to SRC from NCTE, Delhi on 10.12.2009. The allegations made against DBHPS institutions by the complainant is as under:-“1. Further, I would like to bring to your kind notice that the student intake is only 100 as per NCTE norms. But in the following colleges they have admitted more than 100 students by taking huge money from other than South India. 1. Dharwad120, 2. Bijapur-150, 3. Belgaum and mysore also excess of students in the attendance they are studying.

2. If NCTE will visit it will be proved through the attendance register, accounts register and how much money collected from the students. It is noticed Sabha people under he instructon of Mr. Neeral Katti collecting 40,000 Rs. And accounting only 20 and 15 thousand rupees. So this matter is very serious and visiting team may sent for investigation and remedy.








(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

67






SRC in its 191st meeting held on 20-21 April 2010 considered the written representation submitted on 30.03.2010 and decided to cause inspection under section 17.


The SRC in its 193rd meeting held on 21,22 June, 2010 considered the report and decided to withdraw recognition for B.Ed. course.

Accordingly, inspection was carried out on 01.06.2010 and the Committee considered the Report and decided to withdraw recognition for B.Ed. course for the following reasons :-

As per VT Report and as countersigned and admitted by the institution, the total built-up-area of the building comes to 7963 sq.ft. It is far short of the NCTE norm of 16,000 sq.ft.

As per VT Report and as admitted by the institution, one Lecturer and Principal do not possess requisite qualification and are not qualified as per NCTE norms.

Records were not produced to verify the quantum of admissions done by the College giving room for suspecting the credentials.

Under the above grounds, the Committee decides to withdraw the recognition for B.Ed. course with immediate effect. It is made clear that the institution is debarred from making any further admission subsequent to the date of issue of this order. The State Government/ affiliating University be informed accordingly.

Withdrawal order was issued to the institution on 02.08.2010.


In the complaint it has been stated that the Centers of DBHP in remote villages are collecting 40 to 50 thousand rupees and granting certificates to various degrees like MA, M.Phil and Ph.D and also they are conducting exams twice in a year. The eligibility for taking such exams are as follows:

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

68


10+2+ Hindi Praveen of Equivalent Exam are eligible to take M.A.Exam 10+2+ Hindi Praveen /Equivalent +Shikshak Training are eligible to take

even M.Ed Exam.







In the light of provisions in the NCTE regulations as amended from time to time, the institution was required to have a minimum built up area of 1500 sq.mts or 16146 sq.ft. for running a B.Ed. Course. The Council noted that in pursuance of a

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

69


complaint received by the NCTE against the institution, the SRC in its 191st

meeting held on 20-24 April, 2010, decided to get the institution inspected under Section 17 of the NCTE Act/Rules/Regulations. It provides that where the Regional Committee is on its own motion or on any representation received from any person, satisfied that a recognized institution has contravened any of the provisions of the Act, or the rules, regulations, orders made or issued there under, or any condition subject to which recognition under Section 14 or permission under Section 15 was granted, it may withdraw recognition of such recognized institution for reasons to be recorded in writing. It is thus implied that while it is not mandatory for the Regional Committee in its discretion, decides to conduct an inspection. Accordingly, the SRC vide its letter dated 26.4.2010 asked the institution to furnish filled-in questionnaire along with requisite documents. The institution furnished the filled-in questionnaire along with requisite documents. The institution furnished the filled in questionnaire, affidavits etc. vide its letter dated 6.5.2010. In the filled in questionnaire, the institution indicated that the available land and built up area with the institution was 625.7 sq.mtrs or 6735 sq.ft. In the affidavit dated 4.5.2010 furnished by the institution, it indicated that the available land and built up area was 6736 sq.ft. each. The visiting team, which conducted the inspection under Section 17 of the NCTE Act, in its report dated 3.6.2010 indicated that the available land and built up area with the institution was 4910 sq.ft. and 6736 sq.ft.(excluding common area) respective ely. Thus, the VT report dated 3.6.2010 also bear testimony to the claim made by the available built up area with the institution was 6736 sq.ft. or 625.7 sq.mts. only as against the requirement of minimum of 1500 sq.mts. as per NCTE regulations. When the position was pointed out to the representatives of the DBHPS, as in case of other institutions run by them they informed that the Principal of the College inadvertently furnished wrong information regarding built up area to the SRC and the VT and that the actual built up area available exclusively for the B.Ed. course was 16200 sq.ft. i.e., 1550 sq.mts. They also stated that adequate labs, game and sports facilities were available as per the NCTE norms with the institution and the faculty members were qualified as per NCTE norms, as already indicated in their appeal and the records available could be verified. The Council also noted that the SRC issued the withdrawal order dated 02.08.2010 directly without issuing any showcause notice on the basis of the VTR, for making a representation by the institution as required under the provision of the NCTE Act. The Council therefore came to the conclusion that there was adequate justification in accepting the appeal with the direction to SRC for issuance of show cause notice and for further action thereafter.


The SRC in its 200th meeting held on 20-21 January 2011 considered the Appellate authority order dated 23.12.2010 VT report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to issue Show cause notice. Accordingly, Show cause notice was issued to the institution on 11.03.2011 for the following reasons:

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

70


1. As per VT Report and as countersigned and admitted by the institution, the total built-up-area of the building comes to 7963 sq.ft. It is far short of the NCTE norm of 16,000 sq.ft.

2. As per VT Report and as admitted by the institution, one Lecturer and Principal do not possess requisite qualification and are not qualified as per NCTE norms.

3. Records were not produced to verify the quantum of admissions done by the College giving room for suspecting the credentials.

Now, with the references to the above notice issued by SRC, NCTE dated 11.03.2011 the same was challenged before the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka in W.P.No. 13832-13837/2011 (EDN- RES). The Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka after considering the matter has ordered the Stay on all furhter proceedings by SRC. They have also submitted a copy of the order in W.P.No. 13832-13837/2011 dated 07.04.2011 of Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka.







The writ petition was filed questioning the orders dated 23.12.2010 passed by the 1st respondent-NCTE remanding the matter back to the 2nd respondent, and the consequential show-cause notices dated 11.3.2011 issued by the 2nd respondent-

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

71


SRC.




The Committee considered the matter and decided to inform the Lawyer to file an Appeal against the Court order, by highlighting the grant of recognition by SRCNCTE, Bangalore to DBHS Rajiv Gandhi College of Education, D.C. Compound, Dharwad-580 001, Karnataka for offering B.Ed (AOS0598) & B.Ed (APS0546) course with an intake of 60 students from the session 2000-2001 vide order dt. 10.07.2000.

Appeal Cases

32 SRCAPP1329D.El.Ed

SRM College of Education, Karimnagar

DistrictAP

SRM College of Education, No. 245,Chintakunt Village & Post, Karimnagar Taluk & District, Andhra Pradesh

SRM Academy of Computer Education, SRM Nagar, Chintakunta Road,Chintakunta Village & Post, Karimnagar Taluk & District – 505001, Andhra Pradesh has applied for grant of recognition to SRM College of Education, No. 245,Chintakunt Village & Post, Karimnagar Taluk & District, Andhra Pradesh for D.EI.Ed course online on 30.09.2011 for two years duration under section 14(1) of the NCTE Act 1993 and received in the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE on 18.10/2011.

NCTE-Hqrs had directed to process the applications in accordance with NCTE Regulations 2009, it amendment notified on 26th November 2010 which reads as follows :

2(B) for Sub Regulation (1-A) the following shall be submitted namely.1 (1-A) (I) the application shall be summarily rejected under one or more of the following circumstances :

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

72


The processing fee, as provided under Rule 9 of the National Council for Teacher Education Rules 1997 is not furnished on or before the date of submission of online application.

Hard copy in triplicate of the online application is not dispatched within 7 days of the submission of the online application.

Copy of the registered land documents issued by the competent authority indicating that the society. Institution applying for the course possessed land on the date of application is not dispatched within 7 days of the submission of online application.

The SRC considered the matter in its 213th meeting held on 6th -7th November 2011 and careful perusal of the original file of the institution and other related documents, NCTE Act 1993 Regulations and guidelines from time to time laid on the table. The Regional Committee decided to reject the application on the following grounds.

Hard copy submitted after stipulated period of 7 days from the date of online submission.

Accordingly, a rejection letter was issued to the institution vide.no. F.No SRCAPP 1329(2012-13)/ D.EI.Ed /AP/2011-12/36199 dated 23/01/2012

Aggrieved by the rejection order of SRC the institution preferred an appeal to NCTE-Hqrs and the appellate authority in its order no. F.No.89-85/2012 Appeal/4th

Meeting-2012 A51676 dated 11/05/2012 state that “ the Council came to conclusion that the appeal deserved to be accepted and the matter be remanded to SRC for further processing of the application on merit as per Regulations.”

The Southern Regional Committee in its 223rd meeting held on 29th – 31st May 2012 considered the Appellate authority order dt. 11/05/2012 and decided to process the application on submission of original application and related supporting documents as per the regulations

As per the decision of SRC, the file was processed and a deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 03/07/2012.

The institution has not submitted reply for deficiency letter even after stipulated period of 60 days.

The Committee also noted Supreme Court Order:

Supreme Court vide their order in Civil Appeal NO. 1125-1128/2011 in SLP No. 17165-68/2009 filed by NCTE Vs ors, which reads as under:


(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

73


The SRC in its 234th meeting held on 17th-18th October 2012, considered the matter, as the institution has not submitted reply for deficiency letter even after stipulated period of 60 days from the date of issue of deficiency letter and with reference to the totality of information collected & based on a collective application of mind, the committee decided as per clause 7(1) of NCTE Regulations 2009, to refuse and reject the application of the institution for recognition of D.El.Ed course.

Accordingly, rejection order was issued to institution on 19.11.2012.

Aggrieved by the rejection order of SRC the institution preferred an appeal to NCTE-Hqrs and the appellate authority in its order no. F.No.89-30/2013 Appeal/4th

Meeting-2012 dated 01/04/2013 state that

“……the council concluded that the case may be remanded to the SRC for reissuance of deficiency letter to the appellant institution and process the case further as per regulations.”

The SRC in its 244th meeting held on 9th-11th May 2013, considered the Appellate authority order dt. 12/03/2013 and decided to further process the application of the said institution as per NCTE Regulations.

The Committee considered the Appellate Authority’s order dt. 12/03/2013 to reissuance of deficiency letter to the institution and decided to send the deficiency letter to the institution once again.


Vaishnavi College of Education, Nalgonda

DistrictAP

Vaishnavi College of Education Plot No. 137, MDR NGR Pale Annaram Village and Post office Kodad City, Chilkur Taluk Nalgonda District — 508 238 Andhra Pradesh

Vaishnavi College of Education, Plot No. 137, Beside MIIS College, Road, Paleamaram Village and Post Office,, Chilkur Taluka,, Kodad City, Nalgonda District, Andhra Pradesh had applied for grant of recognition to Vaishnavi College of Education Plot No. 137, MDR NGR Pale Annaram Village and Post office Kodad City, Chilkur Taluk Nalgonda District — 508 238 Andhra Pradesh for D.El.Ed Course of Two years duration under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online on 29.09.2011 and physical application has been received in the office of SRC on 03.10.2011.

The application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State Government for recommendation on 21.10.2011 / 19.12.2011 (Reminder). A deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 29.12.2011. Now the institution has replied to the deficiency letter on 28.02.2012.

The SRC in its 220th meeting held on 30-31 March 2012, considered the reply of the institution dt. 28.02.2102 and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under Section 14(1) of NCTE Act.

Accordingly, Show cause notice was issued to the institution on 08.05.2012. The institution submitted its reply on 21.05.2012.

The SRC in its 223rd Meeting of SRC held on 29th – 31st May 2012, considered the reply of the institution dt.21-05-2012 and all other relevant documents and decided to cause inspection under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, to examine whether the institution fulfils all the requirements as per the norms, for the proposed

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

74


programme, subject to the condition that the deficiencies, if any, were duly rectified by the institution, as per the norms.

As per the direction of SRC, the inspection of the institution was conducted on 06.07.2012 and the VT Report received in the office of SRC on 10.07.2012.

The Southern Regional Committee in its 227th meeting held on 17th -19th July, 2012 considered the reply of the institution vide letter dt. 10.05.2012 and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act.

The institution has submitted its written representations on 16/07/2012 and 27/07/2012 as per information in the website which is as follows:

The reply of the institution to the show cause notice was duly considered by SRC in its 224th meeting held on 30th & 31st July 2012, and the reply is unconvincing and not satisfactory, deficiencies still persist as under:

As per VCD observation/as seen in VCD, a part of first floor and 2nd floor of the building is still under construction and incomplete. As per NCTE Regulations 2009, the building should be ready at the time of VT visit.

8 (10) of Regulations States”“At the time of inspection, the building of the institution shall beComplete in the form of a permanent structure on the land possessed by the institution in terms of sub-regulation (7) of Regulation 8, equipped with all necessary amenities and fulfilling all such requirements as prescribed in the norms and standards. The applicant institution shall produce the original completion certificate issued by the competent Government Authority or local body authority, approved building plan in proof of the completion of building and built up area and other documents to the visiting team for verification. No temporary structure or asbestos roofing shall be allowed in the institution, even if it is in addition to the prescribed built up area”.

The reply to the show cause notice is not satisfactory and unconvincing.

Under the above grounds and with reference to the totality of information collected & based on a collective application of mind, the committee decided as per NCTE Regulations 2009, to refuse and reject the application of the institution for recognition of D.El.Ed course.

Accordingly, rejection order was issued to the institution on 29/08/2012.

Aggrieved by the rejection order of SRC, the institution preferred an appeal to NCTE-Hqrs and the appellate authority in its order No. F.No. 89-520/2012Appeal/10th Meeting-2012 dated 12/03/2013 stated that

“…after perusal of the documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the council concluded that the matter be remanded to the SRC with a direction to re-examine if the completed part of the building at the time of inspection was

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

75


adequate to meet the prescribed norms.

The council hereby remands back the case of Vaishnavi College of Education, Nalgonda, Andhra Pradesh to the SRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above”.

The SRC in its 244th meeting held on 9th-11th May 2013, considered the Appellate authority order dt. 12/03/2013 and decided to further process the application of the said institution as per NCTE Regulations.

In pursuance to the appellate authority order, the application is processed

The Committee observed the 2 VCDs of the said institution, the building shown in the VCDs do not tally with the building described in the building plan and 2 building completion certificates submitted.

The Committee considered the Appellate authority order dt. 12/03/2013 and decided to re-examine the building for its adequacy for the proposed programme, all other relevant document and accordingly decided to cause inspection afresh under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, on payment of inspection fee, to examine whether the institution fulfils all the requirements as per the norms, for the proposed programme, subject to the condition that the deficiencies, if any, were duly rectified by the institution, as per the norms.

The VT members to be informed to obtain fresh building plan, building completion certificate and VCD of the said institution.

34 APS02606/ APS03870

D.T.Ed/ B.EdMatha

Teacher Training

Institute for Men and Women,

Sivagangai District

TN

Matha Teacher Training Institute for Men and Women, Annavasal Road, Manamadurai, Keelamelkudi - 623 606, Sivagangai District, Tamilnadu. Matha Teacher Training Institute for Men and Women, Annavasal Road, Manamadurai, Keelamelkudi - 623 606, Sivagangai District, Tamilnadu had submitted an application for D.T.Ed Course on 22.06.2004. The institution was granted recognition on 10.12.2004 with an annual intake of 50 students, with the condition to shift to own premises within 3 years.

The institution vide its letter dated 26.09.2007 submitted its proposal for shifting of premises along with Rs.40,000/-. Accordingly Inspection of the institution was fixed between 30th May - 4th June 2011. The same was intimated to the institution on 23.05.2011. The inspection of the institution was conducted on 01.06.2011.

The institution is also running B.Ed course, which was granted recognition on 11.08.2006.

The SRC in its 211th meeting held on 21st-23rd September, 2011 considered the VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and decided to serve Show Cause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act. Accordingly, a Show Cause Notice was issued to the institution on 02.12.2011. The institution had submitted its written representation on 22.11.2011.

The SRC in its 216th meeting held on 11th-12th January, 2012 considered the reply of the institution dt. 22.12.2011, VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and decided to serve Final Show Cause Notice under Section 17 of

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

76


NCTE Act. Accordingly, a Final Show Cause Notice was issued to the institution on 27.02.2012. The institution had submitted its written representation on 21.03.2012.

The reply of the institution dt. 21.03.2012 to the show cause notice was duly considered in 223rd meeting held on 29th -31st May 2012 and the reply is unconvincing and not satisfactory, deficiencies still persist as under:

a) Sale deed of land document submitted is in individual name, which is not permissible as per NCTE norms.

b) Original building completion certificate from competent Govt. authorized engineer is not submitted.

c) The management has not submitted, certificate from the Govt. affiliating body to the effect that no other programme being conducted by the institution in the same building/campus, along with the existing earmarked courses.

d) Salary is not paid as per Central/State/Govt/UGC to the staff members and consolidated salary is being paid to the staff members.

Under the above grounds and with reference to the totality of information collected & based on a collective application of mind, the committee decided as per NCTE Regulations 2009, to withdraw recognition of the institution for B.Ed course for the year 2012-13. In order to enable the ongoing batch of students in B.Ed, course, if any, to complete their course.

Further, Under the above grounds and with reference to the totality of information collected & based on a collective application of mind, the committee decided as per NCTE Regulations 2009, to withdraw recognition of the institution for D.Ed course for the year 2012-13. in order to enable the ongoing batch of students in D.Ed course, if any, to complete their course.

Accordingly, withdrawal order was issued to the institution on 25.06.2012 for B.Ed and D.T.Ed courses.

The institution moved to Hon’ble High Court at Madras dtd 27.06.2012 in W.P (M.Ed) Nos.2 and 2 of 2012 in W.P (M.Ed) Nos.8642 and 8643 of 2012 read as under:-

“………in the affidavit filled therewith the High Court will be pleased to stay all further proceedings of the respondent taken in pursuant to its 223rd meeting held on 29th-31st May,2012 so far as it concerns the petitioner institution pending disposal of the both WP’s.ORDER: This petition coming for orders upon persuing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S Ramajegadeesanm Adocate for the petition the court made the following order:-

There shall be an order of interim Stay”.

The SRC in its 235th meeting held on 21st – 22nd November, 2012 considered the NCTE Hqrs letter dt.15th September 2012 regarding complaint to the said college and advised SRO to file the papers in the relevant file. Accordingly, the papers

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

77


was filed.

The institution preferred appeal to NCTE Hqrs and Appellate Authority vide order No. F.No. 89-486/2012 Appeal/9th meeting-2012 dtd.10.10.2012 has stated as follows.

“after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after considering oral arguments advance during the hearing ,the Council concluded that there was adequate ground to remand the case of the SRC for taking necessary action as indicated above.

NOW THEREFORE, the council hereby remands back the case of Matha Teacher Training Institute, Sivaganga, Tamilnadu to the SRC,NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above”.

The Committee considered the Hon’ble High Court order dt. 27.06.2012 and also the Appellate Authority order dt. 10.10.2012, decided to get the stay vacated through the lawyer and case is to be dismissed as the deficiencies listed are valid and forceful. While getting the stay vacated, the lawyer to be informed to cite the Supreme Court order regarding strict enforcement of norms/standards which reads as under:


“An institution is not entitled to recognition unless it fulfills the conditions specified in various clauses of the Regulations. The Council is directed to ensure that in future no institution is granted recognition unless it fulfils the conditions laid down in the Act and the Regulations and the time schedule fixed for processing the application by the Regional Committee and communication of the decision on the issue of recognition it strictly adhered to”.

35 SRCAPP582M.Ed

St.Charles College of Education, Madhurai

DistrictTN

St. Charles College of Education, Plot/Khasara No. 46/3, Plot No. 4:523, Thirunagar Post, Thanakkankulam Village, Madhurai Taluk & District-625006, Tamilnadu.

St. Charles Society Madurai, Plot No. 4:523, Street/Road. Convent Road, Thiruvalluvar Nagar Village, Thanakkanakulam Post, Madurai Taluk & District-625006, Tamilnadu had applied for grant of recognition to St. Charles College of Education, Plot/Khasara No. 46/3, Plot No. 4:523, Thirunagar Post, Thanakkankulam Village, Madhurai Taluk & District-625006, Tamilnadu, for M.Ed Course for One year duration under Section 15(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online on 21.09.2011. The institution has submitted hard copy of the application on 30.09.2011.

The application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State Government for recommendation on 25.02.2012. A reminder letter to the State Government was sent on 01.05.2012. A deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 27.02.2012. The institution has replied to the deficiency letter on 26.04.2012.

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

78


The SRC in its 222nd meeting held on 09th – 10th May 2012, considered the reply of the institution vide letter dt.26.04.2012 and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice.


The SRC in its 228th meeting held on 24th –25th July 2012 considered the reply of the institution vide letter dt. 27.06.2012 and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, for the following:

Original certified copy of the land documents from Govt. authority is not submitted.

The institution has not submitted valid minority certificate issued by the competent authority from the State Govt. as M.Ed is banned in the State of Tamilnadu.

NAAC certificate is not submitted.

Accordingly, show cause notice was issued to the institution on 09.08.2012.

The institution has not submitted reply for Show Cause Notice even after the expiry of stipulated time of 21 days from the date of issue of the notice.

The SRC in its 233rd meeting held on 26th – 28th September, 2012 considered the non-reply of the institution to the issue of show cause notice dt. 09.08.2012 and with reference to the totality of information collected & based on a collective application of mind, the committee decided as per NCTE Regulations 2009, to refuse and reject the application of the institution for recognition of M.Ed course.

Accordingly, a rejection order was issued to the institution vide no. F.No. SRCAPP582/M.Ed (Minority)/TN/2012-13/46911 dated 29.10.2012.

The institution preferred an appeal to NCTE, Hqrs and the Appellate Authority vide order no. F.No. 89-817/2012 Appeal/4 th Meeting- 2013 dated 01.04.2013 has stated as follows:

“after perusal of the documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that the matter deserved to be remanded to the SRC to consider the reply of the institution and all other submissions and take further action as per the Regulations.

Now therefore, the Council hereby remands back the case of St. Charles College of Education, Madurai, Tamilnadu to the SRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above”.

The matter was placed before SRC in its 243 rd Meeting held on 29th – 30th April, 2013 and the committee decided to process and put up.

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

79


The Committee considered the Appellate authority order dt. 01.04.2013 directing to consider the reply of the institution and all other submissions for necessary action, which are duly considered and decided to reject the application for the following deficiencies still persist as under:

The applicant institution does not have title to land.

The institution has not submitted valid minority certificate issued by the competent authority from the State Govt. as M.Ed is banned in the State of Tamilnadu.

Under the above grounds and with reference to the totality of information collected & based on a collective application of mind, the committee decided as per NCTE Regulations 2009, to reject the application of the institution for recognition of M.Ed course.

LOI/Formal Recognition Cases

36 SRCAPP883D.El.EdJhansi

College of Education, Prakasam

DistrictAP

Jhansi College of Education, Plot No. 461/1, Darsi Village and Post, Darsi Taluka and Town, Prakasam District – 523247, Andhra Pradesh.

BMR Educational and Service Society, Plot No. 461/1, Addanki Road, Karsi Villlage and Post, Darsi Taluka and Town, Prakasam District – 532 247, Andhra Pradesh had applied for grant of recognition to Jhansi College of Education, Plot No. 461/1, Darsi Village and Post, Darsi Taluka and Town, Prakasam District – 523247, Andhra Pradesh for D.El.Ed course of two years duration under section 15(1)) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE on on-line on 28.09.2011 and physical application has been received on 07.10.2011.

The said application was refused and rejected on 23.01.2012 on the ground that “Hard Copy not submitted within time bound as per Regulation 2009, against which the institution has preferred appeal before the Appellate Authority.

The Appellate authority vide its order dt. 18.04.2012 remands back the case to SRC for further processing of the application on merit as per regulations. Hence, the application was scrutinized as per the provisions contained in the NCTE Regulations 2009.

Accordingly, a deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 21.06.2012. The institution has replied to the deficiency letter on 25.06.2012.

The SRC in its 228th meeting of SRC held on 24th – 25th July 2012, considered the reply of the institution vide letter dt. 10.05.2012 and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, for the following:

Total earmarked built up area for B.Ed and for proposed D.El.Ed course is not given.

As per the directions of SRC a Show Cause Notice was issued to the institution on 13.08.2012. The reply for show cause notice was received on 13.08.2012.

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

80


The SRC in its 230th meeting held on 16th - 17th August, 2012 considered the reply of the institution dt.13-08-2012 and all other relevant documents and decided to cause inspection under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, to examine whether the institution fulfils all the requirements as per the norms, for the proposed programme, subject to the condition that the deficiencies, if any, were duly rectified by the institution, as per the norms.

Accordingly, inspection of the institution was fixed between 03rd – 06th September, 2012. The same was intimated to institution on 31/08/2012. The inspection of the institution was conducted on 12/09/2012.

On careful perusal of the original file of the institution, reply of the institution, all relevant documents and other related documents, Act of NCTE, 1993, Regulations and guidelines of NCTE published from time to time laid on the table, the Regional Committee in its 233rd Meeting held on 26th – 28th September 2012 decided to issue Letter of Intent for grant of recognition to D.El.Ed course of two year duration with an annual intake of 50(Fifty only)(one unit) for the academic year 2013-14 subject to the appointment of qualified staff through duly constituted selection committee as per the Norms of NCTE/State Government/Affiliating University and be given effect before the commencement of the academic session.

Accordingly, a Letter of Intent was issued to the institution on 04.10.2012. The institution has submitted its reply to LOI on 15.11.2012.

On Careful perusal of the original file of the institution and staff profiles submitted by the institution in response to the letter of Intent, the SRC in its 236 th Meeting held on 16th-18th December, 2012 decided that Formal Recognition be granted to D.El.Ed., course of two year duration with an annual intake of 50 (Fifty only) students from the year 2013-14, subject to production of joining report of Principal.

Accordingly, a letter was issued to the institution on 27/12/2012 with subject to produce joining report of Principal.

The institution has submitted its reply along with joining report of the Principal on 21/12/2012 based on website information.

Meantime the institution preferred an appeal to NCTE-Hqrs and the appellate authority in its order No. F.No.89-77/2012/2012Appeal/1stMeeting-2013 dated 16/04/2012 stated that “…as per the notification of the NCTE dated 31/07/2012, the Regional Committees were to communicate final decision either granting recognition or refusing recognition for the academic session 2012-13 on or before the 31st August, 2012.

The council also noted that the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in their order dated 31/01/2011 in Civil Appeal No. 1125-1128 / 2011 inter alia held that the time schedule fixed for processing of the applications and communication of the decision on the issue of recognition should be strictly adhered to the council further noted that the Govt. of Andhra Pradesh has written to the SRC, NCTE on 08/08/2012 requesting them not to issue any letter of Intent/Recognition in respect of new private D.Ed Colleges to start D.Ed course during 2012-13 in Andhra

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

81


Pradesh State as (i) it is mandatory for D.Ed colleges to have 200 working days exclusive of the period of examination and admission (ii) as only one month is left before the commencement of the academic session 2012-13 and if any new letters of intent are issued the institutions will fail to fulfill the NCTE Norm of 200 working days and (iii) it will also disturb the academic year 2012-13 in Andhra Pradesh. In view of the above the council concluded that the SRC was justified in not issued letter of intent for the academic session 2012-13 and therefore, the appeal deserved to be rejected and the order of the SRC confirmed.

After perusal of the documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the council concluded that the SRC was justified in issuing letter of Intent for the academic session 2013-14 and therefore the appeal deserved to be rejected and the order of the SRC confirmed ”.

The appellate authority order was placed before SRC in its 242nd Meeting held on 14th-16th April, 2013 and the committee has noted the matter.

The Hon’ble Supreme Court judgment in Maa Vaishno Devi case reported in (2013) 2 SCC 617 para 87.3 to para 87.4.

“….. 87.3 : The recognition and affiliation granted as per the above Schedule shall be applicable for the current academic year. For example, recognition granted upto 03.03.2013 and affiliation granted up to 10.05.2013 shall be effective for the academic year 2013-2014 i.e. the courses starting from 01.04.2013. For the academic year 2013-2014, no recognition shall be issued after 03.03.2013 and no affiliation shall be granted after 10.05.2013. Any affiliation or recognition granted after the above cut-off dates shall only be valid for the academic year 2014-15….”

“…..87.4 : We make it clear that no Authority / person / Council / Committee shall be entitled to vary the Schedule for any reason whatsoever. Any non-compliance shall amount to violating the orders of the court….”

On Careful perusal of the original file of the institution and staff profiles submitted by the institution in response to the letter of Intent, the Regional Committee decided that Formal Recognition be granted to D.El.Ed., course of two year duration with an annual intake of 50 (Fifty only) students from the academic session 2014-15.

(Formal recognition from 2014-15 is in accordance with the general directive of Supreme Court order dt. 13.12.2012).


DRS College of Education,

Warangal District

AP

DRS College of Education, No.298/C1, Fatehpur Village, Thorrur Post & Taluk, Warangal District-506163, Andhra Pradesh.

Sri Vignyan Educational Society, No. 10-4-170/A, Mamillagudem Road, Khammam Village, Post & Taluk, Khammam District-507001, Andhra Pradesh has applied for grant of recognition to DRS College of Education, No. 298/C1, Fatehpur Village, Thorrur Post & Taluk, Warangal District-506163, Andhra Pradesh for D.E.C.Ed

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

82


course online on 30.09.2011 for two years duration under section 14(1) of the NCTE Act. 1993 and received in the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE on 10.10.2011 (by private courier without date).

Meanwhile, SRC considered the matter in its 213th meeting held on 06th-07th

November, 2011 and careful perusal of the original file of the institution and other related documents, NCTE Act 1993. Regulations and guidelines from time to time laid on the table. The Regional Committee decided to reject the application on the following grounds.

Hard copy not submitted within time frame.

The institution has submitted proof of dispatch on 1.12.2011 & 5.12.2011 in response to this office letter dated 09/11/2011 i.e. after the decision of SRC 213 th

meeting held on 6th and 7th November, 2011. As per the decision of SRC, the rejection order was issued on 24/01/2012 for non-submission of hard copy within the time frame. The reply to proof of dispatch was received late it could not be entertained, since the SRC has already taken a decision.

Aggrieved by the rejection order of SRC the institution preferred an appeal to NCTE-Hqrs and the appellate authority in its order no. F.No.89-106/2012 Appeal/4th Meeting-2012 A 51640 dated 11/05/2012 state that “the council concluded that there was adequate Justification in remanding the case to the SRC for further processing of the application on merit as per regulations”.

SRC in its 223rd Meeting held on 29th and 31st May 2012 considered the appeal order and decided to process the application. Accordingly deficiency letter was sent on 11.07.2012 for SRCAPP1466/ D.E.C.Ed. The institution submitted reply to deficiency letter on 23.07.2012.

SRC in its 229th SRC Meeting held on 30th -31st July 2012 considered the reply to deficiency letter and decided to cause inspection. Accordingly inspection letter was issued on 07.08.2012 for SRCAPP1466/ D.E.C.Ed.

VT report was considered in 231st Meeting held on 22nd – 23rd August 2012 and decided to issue show cause notice. Meantime the institution had submitted reply by seeing the NCTE Website.

SRC in its 233rd Meeting held on 26th -29th September 2012 and decided to issue Letter of intent for the year 2013-14 for D.El.Ed. Letter of intent was issued on 12.10.2012 for SRCAPP1466/D.El.Ed.

The application was for D.E.C.Ed and was processed as D.E.C.Ed only up to issue of Show Cause Notice in 229 th SRC Meeting held on 30 th - 31 st July 2012. Whereas as per the decision of 233 rd SRC Meeting held on 26 th – 28 th

September 2012 the decision was issue of LOI for 2013-14 for SRCAPP1466/D.El.Ed. Accordingly Letter of Intent was issued on 12.10.2012 for SRCAPP1466/D.El.Ed

Now the SRC in its 236th Meeting held on 16th -17th December 2012 has decided to issue Formal Recognition for 2013-14 for D.El.Ed course.

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

83


The SRC in its 241st Meeting held on 29th-31st March, & 1st April, 2013 considered the matter and decided to issue Formal Recognition from the session 2013-14 for D.El.Ed course as decided in the 236th meeting held on 16-18th of December, 2012.

The Hon’ble Supreme Court judgment in Maa Vaishno Devi case reported in (2013) 2 SCC 617 para 87.3 to para 87.4.

“….. 87.3: The recognition and affiliation granted as per the above Schedule shall be applicable for the current academic year. For example, recognition granted upto 03.03.2013 and affiliation granted up to 10.05.2013 shall be effective for the academic year 2013-2014 i.e. the courses starting from 01.04.2013. For the academic year 2013-2014, no recognition shall be issued after 03.03.2013 and no affiliation shall be granted after 10.05.2013. Any affiliation or recognition granted after the above cut-off dates shall only be valid for the academic year 2014-15….”

“…..87.4: We make it clear that no Authority / person / Council / Committee shall be entitled to vary the Schedule for any reason whatsoever. Any non-compliance shall amount to violating the orders of the court….”

On Careful perusal of the original file of the institution and staff profiles submitted by the institution in response to the letter of Intent, the Regional Committee decided that Formal Recognition be granted to D.El.Ed., course of two year duration with an annual intake of 50 (Fifty only) students from the academic session 2014-15.

(Formal recognition from 2014-15 is in accordance with the general directive of Supreme Court order dt. 13.12.2012).

38 SRCAPP604D.El.Ed

Bethany D.Ed College, East

Godavari District

AP

Bethany D.Ed College, No. 26/1, Ethakota Village, Ravulapalem Post, Kothapeta Taluk, East Godavari District-533238, Andhra Pradesh.

Bethany Educational Society, D.No. 7-28/2, Market Street, Ravulapalem Village & Post, Kothapeta Tlauk, East Godavari District-533238, Andhra Pradesh, had applied for recognition to Bethany D.Ed College, No. 26/1, Ethakota Village, Ravulapalem Post, Kothapeta Taluk, East Godavari District-533238, Andhra Pradesh, for D.El.Ed course of two year duration under section 14 (1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 and hardcopy received in the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE on 26.09.2011.

As per NCTE –Hqrs, have published a Public Notice in Deccan Herald on 30 th July, 2011 states as under;

National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE) invites applications for recognition of teacher training courses for the academic session 2012-13. applications in the prescribed from should be submitted “on-line” to the concerned Regional Committee along with fee ad essential documents as prescribed in NCTE regulations, 2009 from 1st August, 2011 to 30th

September, 2011 only.

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

84


There is discrepancy in the Demand Draft no. given in online form and photocopy with application. The application submitted by the institution does not possess prescribed processing fees either in form of Demand Draft or Challan Xerox copy of demand draft is submitted which is not acceptable. Hence, the request of the institution is found ineligible as per NCTE Regulations, 2009. Therefore, the application for starting D.El.Ed course cannot be entertained and the application submitted by the institution to be returned.

Accordingly, the application along with other documents submitted by the institution for D.Ed course is returned vide letter no. F.No.SRCAPP604/D.El.Ed/2012-2013/AP/31255 dated 18/10/2011.

The institution preferred an appeal to NCTE-Hqrs and the appellate authority in its order no. F.No.89-201/2012 Appeal/6th Meeting-2012 dated 17/07/2012 state that “the council concluded that there was adequate ground to remand the case to the SRC for further processing of the application on merit as per Regulations”.

In obedience to the appeal order dated 17/07/2012 F.No. 89-201/2012/Appeal / 6th

meeting-2012, the SRC in its 231st meeting held on 22nd-23rd August 2012, considered the Appellate authority order dt. 17/07/2012 and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, for the following:

1. Notarized English version of the certified copy land documents not submitted.2. Approved blue print of the building plan issued by competent civil authority is not

submitted. 3. Original building completion certificate from competent Govt. engineer is not

submitted. In the BCC submitted.4. As per encumbrance certificate submitted, land is in the name of an individual,

nature of the document is release deed, date of registration of land document is different from the land document.

5. Proof of completion of 3 academic sessions towards B.Ed course which is already run by the institution from the affiliating body/State Govt/examining body is not submitted.

The institution has submitted its written representation on 06.09.2012 (with reference to online minutes).

The SRC in its 233rd Meeting held on 26th-28th September, 2012 considered the reply of the institution and all other relevant documents and decided to cause inspection under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, to examine whether the institution fulfils all the requirements as per the norms, for the proposed programme, subject to the condition that the deficiencies, if any, were duly rectified by the institution, as per the norms.

Accordingly, inspection of the institution was fixed between 15th-20th November, 2012 the same was intimated to the institution on 05/11/2012. The inspection of the institution was conducted on 16/11/2012.

The SRC in its 236th meeting held on 16th –17th December 2012 considered the VT report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, for

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

85


the following:

Approved blue print of the building plan issued by competent civil authority is not submitted. In the approved building plan copy submitted, total earmarked built up area for both B.Ed and D.Ed is not mentioned.

Original building completion certificate from competent Govt. authorized engineer is not submitted. In the BCC submitted, total earmarked built up area for both B.Ed and D.Ed is not mentioned.

As per V.T report, available seating capacity in the library is only 40 for both B.Ed and D.El.Ed courses, which is less than the requirement as per NCTE norms.

As per VT report, No. of books available in the library is only 1000, which is less than the requirement as per NCTE norms.

As per building plan submitted, the size of the multipurpose hall is less than the requirement of 2000 sq.ft as per NCTE norms.

Original notarized Up-to-date encumbrance certificate issued by sub-registrar is not submitted.

Accordingly show cause notice was issued to the institution on 28.01.2013. Meantime by seeing the SRC website the institution has submitted the reply to the show cause notice on 23.01.2013.

On careful perusal of the original file of the institution, reply of the institution, all relevant documents and other related documents, Act of NCTE, 1993, Regulations and guidelines of NCTE published from time to time laid on the table, the Regional Committee in its 241st meeting held on 30 -31st March & 1st April 2013 decided to issue Letter of Intent for grant of recognition to D.El.Ed course of two year duration with an annual intake of 50(Fifty only)(one unit), subject to the appointment of qualified staff through duly constituted selection committee as per the Norms of NCTE/State Government/Affiliating University and be given effect before the commencement of the academic session.

Accordingly LOI was issued to the institution on 10.04.2013.

Reply to the LOI from the institution received on 15.05.2013.

The Committee considered the reply of the institution vide letter dt. 15.05.2013 and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under section 14 of NCTE Act, for the following:

The institution has not submitted joining report of Principal.

In view of the above and with reference to the totality of information collected & based on a collective application of mind, the Committee decided to issue a Show cause Notice to the institution as to why the recognition be not refused and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation by 30 th June, 2013 from the date of receipt of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

86


to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the rejection of application for recognition, based on the records available, with no further notice.

39 SRCAPP527D.El.Ed

Sri Venkatasai

D.Ed College, Prakasam

DistrictAP

Sri. Venkatasai D.Ed College, Plot No.418/A, Street No.1, Pernamitta Village and P.O., Ongole Taluk, Prakasam District, Pin – 523225, Andhra Pradesh.

Sri.Venkata Sai Educational Development Society, Plot No.6-31(D), Sri.Saibaba Mandir Bazar street, Ongole Village and P.O., Prakasam District, Pin – 523002, Andhra Pradesh had applied for grant of recognition to Sri.Venkatasai D.Ed College, Plot No.418/A, Street No.1, Pernamitta Village and P.O., Ongole Taluk, Prakasam District, Pin – 523225, Andhra Pradesh for D.El.Ed Course of Two years duration under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online on 15.09.2011 and physical application has been received in the office of SRC on 23.09.2011.

NCTE – H'qrs had directed to process the applications in accordance with NCTE Regulation 2009, it amendment Notified on 26th November, 2010 which reads as follows:-

2(B) for Sub Regulation (1-A) the following shall be submitted namely’. 1(1-A)(I) the application shall be summarily rejected under one or more of the following circumstances:

a) The processing fee, as provided under rule 9 of the National Council for Teacher Education rules, 1997 is not furnished on or before the ate of submission of online application.

b) Hard copy in triplicate of the online application is not dispatched within 7 days of the submission of the online application.

c) Copy of the registered land documents issued by the competent authority indicating that the society. Institution applying for the course possessed land on the date of application ID s not dispatched within 7 days of the submission of online application.

SRC considered the matter in its 213th Meeting held on 06th – 07th November 2011 and careful perusal of the original file of the institution and other related documents, NCTE Act 1993, Regulations and guidelines from time to time laid on the table, the Regional Committee decided to reject the application on the following grounds:

Not submitted within time frame as per Regulations 2009.

Accordingly, the application of Sri. Venkatasai D.Ed College, Plot No.418/A, Street No.1, Pernamitta Village and P.O., Ongole Taluk, Prakasam District, Pin – 523225, Andhra Pradesh for permission to D.El.Ed course was rejected.

Accordingly rejection letter was issued to the institution on 13.01.2012.

Aggrieved by the order of SRC, the institution preferred to go for an appeal with High Court.

The SRC in its 230th Meeting held on 16th – 17th decided to process the application.


87


The application was processed and placed in SRC in 231st Meeting held on 22rd – 23rd August 2012. The SRC considered the Hon’ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh order and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act.

Mean while the institution was has submitted its written representation on 11.09.2012 with online website minutes reference as follows:-

The SRC in its 233rd Meeting held on 26th – 28th September 2012,considered the reply of the institution dt. 11.09.2012 and all other relevant documents and decided to cause inspection under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, to examine whether the institution fulfils all the requirements as per the norms, for the proposed programme, subject to the condition that the deficiencies, if any, were duly rectified by the institution, as per the norms.

As per the direction of SRC, the inspection of the institution was conducted on 16.11.2012 and the VT Report received in the office of SRC on 19.06.02012.

The SRC in its 236th meeting held on 16th – 18th November 2012 considered the VT report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, for the following:

Approved blue print of the building plan issued by competent civil authority is not submitted.

Notarized land usage certificate from the Revenue divisional office stating that the agriculture land converted to non-agriculture for the educational purpose is not submitted.

Original Up-to-date encumbrance certificate issued by sub-registrar is not submitted.

As per VT report, available books in the library is only 800, which is less than the requirement as per NCTE norms 2009.

Meantime, by seeing the SRC website the institution had replied to the show cause notice on 09.01.2013.

On careful perusal of the original file of the institution, reply of the institution, all relevant documents and other related documents, Act of NCTE, 1993, Regulations and guidelines of NCTE published from time to time laid on the table, the Regional Committee decided in its 240th meeting held on 9-11th March, 2013 to issue Letter of Intent for grant of recognition to D.El.Ed course of two year duration with an annual intake of 50(Fifty only)(one unit), subject to the appointment of qualified staff through duly constituted selection committee as per the Norms of NCTE/State Government/Affiliating University and be given effect before the commencement of the academic session.

Accordingly LOI was issued to the institution on 17.04.2013.

Reply to the LOI from the institution received on 14.05.2013.


88


The Committee considered the reply of the institution vide letter dt. 14.05.2013 and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under section 14 of NCTE Act, for the following:

The institution has not submitted joining report of Principal.

The institution has not activated the website.

In view of the above and with reference to the totality of information collected & based on a collective application of mind, the Committee decided to issue a Show cause Notice to the institution as to why the recognition be not refused and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation by 30 th June, 2013 from the date of receipt of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the rejection of application for recognition, based on the records available, with no further notice.

Other Items

40 APS06008D.T.EdMother Teresa

Women’s University

B.Ed College, Dindigul District

TN

Mother Teresa Women’s University B.Ed. College, Anandagiri 4 th Street, Kodaikanal-624102, Dindigul District, Tamilnadu was accorded recognition for B.Ed. course on 30.08.2006.

As per the recommendation of Sri. Sathyam Committee reports and based on the Directions of MHRD, re-inspection was conducted to all the institutions which were granted recognition in 116th meeting of SRC.

Inspection of the institution under Section 17 was conducted on 16.12.2008 and the VT report along with all documents were placed before 169th meeting of SRC held during 12-13 January, 2009 wherein it was decided to issue Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act. Accordingly, a Notice was issued to the institution on 6.3.2009. The institution submitted its written representation on 3.4.2009 along with supporting documents.

The Committee in its 178th meeting held on 13th-14th July 2009 decided to issue show Cause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act for providing insufficient infrastructural and instructional facilities at the temporary premises and also for not shifting to permanent / own premises before 29.8.2009. Further, the Committee decided to call for 10 documents immediately for shifting of premises and causing of inspection. Accordingly notice was issued to the institution on 31.07.2009. The institution submitted its reply on 10.09.2009 along with Rs.40,000/-.

The inspection of the institution for shifting of premises was carried out on 21.10.2010. The Committee in its 198th meeting held on 24th-26th November 2010 considered the VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice Under Section 17 of NCTE Act for the following. Accordingly, notice was issued to the institution on 06.01.2011. The institution submitted its reply on 24.01.2011.

The Southern Regional Committee in its 201st Meeting held on 22nd - 23rd

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

89


February, 2011 considered the written representation from the institution dated 07.01.2011 to the show cause notice and all other related documents along with the original file of the institution, and decided to Continue Recognition and also shifting to new / permanent premises be permitted. Accordingly Shift order was issued on 29.03.2011.

Now the institution vide letter dated 29.04.2013 requested for change the college name from “Mother Teresa Women’s University B.Ed College, Kodaikanal” to “Women’s University College of Education, Kodaikanal”.

The Committee considered the matter and decided to permit the change of name from & as per the SRO order no. F.SRO/NCTE/2010-2011/27895, dt. 29/03/2011, the name of the college may be read as “Women’s University College of Education, Kodaikanal” in place of “Mother Teresa Women’s University B.Ed, College, Kodaikanal”.

41 APS08737B.Ed

Royal College of Education,

Madurai District

TN

Royal College of Education, No. 7, Raja Sir Muthaiah Nagar, 70 Feet New Ellis Nagar Road, Byepass Road, Madurai - 625 010, Tamilnadu.

Royal College of Education, No. 7, Raja Sir Muthaiah Nagar, 70 Feet New Ellis Nagar Road, Bye-pass Road, Madurai - 625 010, Tamilnadu had submitted an application for B.Ed Course on 25.05.2007. The institution was granted recognition on 07.12.2007 with an annual intake of 100 students, with the condition to shift to own premises within 3 years.

The institution vide its letter dtd. 31.12.2012 has stated that:

“We are running B.Ed college under name and style of ‘Royal College of Education’, established by Valapirai Educational Trust after obtaining the due permission from the NCTE. When the permission was granted to the trust to run our college, a condition was incorporated in the permission letter to shift the college from the temporary building, in which B.Ed., course was conducted by Trust to a new building as per norms prescribed by NCTE. The present permanent college building is located at Thanichiyam in the Madurai to Dindigul (Four Way Lane) Road.

We hereby inform that we have fulfilled the norms stipulated by the NCTE and moved to a new premises owned by the trust which satisfy the norms of the NCTE”. The present address for the college is as follows:

Royal College of EducationThanichiyam (P.O),Near Pumping Station,Madurai (Dist) - 625 221,Tamilnadu.

Further, Para 8(7) of NCTE regulations 2007 provides as under:

No institution shall be granted recognition under these regulations unless it is in possession of required land on the date of application. The land free from all encumbrance could be either on ownership basis or on lease from Government/Govt institutions for a period of not less than 30 years. In cases

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

90


where under relevant State/UT laws the maximum permissible lease period is less than 30 years, the State Government/UT Administration law shall prevail. However, no building could be taken on lease for running any teacher training course.

Remarks:-

The institution was granted recognition at Royal College of Education, No. 7, Raja Sir Muthaiah Nagar, 70 Feet New Ellis Nagar Road, Byepass Road, Madurai - 625 010, Tamilnadu and now the institution has stated that they have shifted to the new premises at Royal College of Education, Thanichiyam (P.O), Near Pumping Station, Madurai(Dist)-625221,Tamilnadu which is not permissible as per NCTE regulations 2007 and hence the institution has violated the NCTE Regulations by shifting the premises.The Southern Regional Committee in its 241st meeting held on 29th & 31st

March & 1st May 2013 has considered the institutions letter dated 31.12.2012 and all other relevant documents and decided to cause inspection subject to payment of inspection fee of Rs. 50,000/-, under NCTE Act, to examine whether the institution fulfils all the requirements as per the norms, for the proposed programme, subject to the condition that the deficiencies, if any, were duly rectified by the institution, as per the norms.

In the meantime, Tamilnadu Teachers Education University has submitted the order Withdrawal Affiliation dtd.07.05.2013 stated that the Syndicate at its meeting held on 17.04.2013 considered the whole subject matter which identified various grave lapses on the part of the College together with the report of the Inspection Commission and explanation submitted by the College to the Show Cause Notice issued by the University and resolved as follows:

“Resolved that as per the powers vested with the Syndicate order section 20(g) of the Tamilnadu Teachers Education University Act, the affiliation granted to Royal College of Education, No.7, Raja Sir Muthiah Nagar, 70 feet New Eills Nagar Road, Bye Pass Road, Madurai 625 010 (College code No.11213) be withdrawn from the academic year 2013-2014 in view of numerous complaints, adverse report of the Surprise Visit Committee and unsatisfactory explanation to the Show Cause Notice.

Resolved further that the NCTE informed that the withdrawal of affiliation granted to the said college and the Management of the college be instructed not to admit students for B.Ed degree course from the academic year 2013-2014.”

The Committee considered the matter and decided that Regional Director should comply with SRC’s order given in the 241st meeting held on 30th, 31st

March, and 01st April 2013, which is as under:

“The Committee considered the institutions letter dt.31-12-2012 and all other relevant documents and decided to cause inspection subject to payment of inspection fee of Rs. 50,000/-, under NCTE Act, to examine whether the institution fulfils all the requirements as per the norms, for the proposed programme, subject to the condition that the deficiencies, if any, were duly rectified by the institution, as per the norms.”

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

91


As per Decision of the SRC 244 th Meeting, following files are put up for consideration

42 SRCAPP507/ APS08608

D.El.EdB.Ed

Sri Y.N. College of Education,

West Godavari District

AP

The SRC in its 244th meeting held on 9th-11th May 2013, committee decided to resubmit along with the B.Ed case (and the VCD) in the 245th meeting (SRCAPP507/D.El.Ed)

Sl.No

Particulars of Documents

SRCAPP507/

D.El.EdAPS08608/B.Ed

1 Name of Institution with address

Sri.Y.N.College of Elementary Education,R.S.No. 47 , 7th Ward , Narasapur Village , Post and Taluk , West Godavari District - 534275 Andhra Pradesh

Sri Y.N. College of Education, Narasapur, West Godavari – 534275, Andhra Pradesh

2 Name of Society with address

Sri Y.N College Committee, R.S.No 47, Narasapur Village , Post and Taluk , West Godavari District 534275 ,Andhra Pradesh

----

3 Trust deed: Name of the Society.

The Narasapur College Committee

The Narsapur College Committee

Date of Regist

04.01.1952

04.01.1952

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

92


ration of the Society.

4 Land Documents:Certificate copy of the registered land documents issued by the Office of the Sub-Registrar/issuing authority

Type of document

Government Order No.2341 dated 22.10.1955

Government Order No.2341 dated 22.10.1955

Sy.No with location

R.S.No.47, Narasapura Village

R.S.No.47, Narasapura Village

Extent Ac.12.30 Ac.12.30In favour of

The Governing Body of th Narsapur College

The Governing Body of th Narsapur College

5 Affidavit:-Original affidavit in the form of Rs.100/- stamp paper.

Sy.No. R.S.No.47 R.S.No.47Location Narasapur NarasapurExtent 12.30 Acre,

3901.70 sq.mtr (for existing B.Ed course & proposed D.Ed.

12.30 Acre, 3901.70 sq.mtr (for proposed B.Ed course)

Built-up area --- 1526.10 sq.mtr (16426.84 sq.ft)

6 Land Use Certificate :- Notarised Land Use Certificate for conversion of agriculture land into non-agriculture purpose issued by Revenue Divisional Officer

Issued by

Tahasildar Mandal Revenue Officer, Narsapur

Notarised

Original submitted

No

Sy.No. R.S.No.47 R.S.No.47Extent Ac.12.30 Ac.12.30 Location

Narsapur Village

Narsapur Village

Converted for

Running the Sri.Y.N.College

Running the Sri Y.N. college previously the Narsapur College

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

93


previously the Narsapur College

7

Building Completion Certificate:

Issued by

Dy.Executive Engineer

Not submitted

Sy.No. R.S.No.47Location

Narsapur Municipality

Built up area

32413.69 sq.ft

Type of roofing

RCC roofingBlock 5 Ground & First floor is RCC & Asbestos

8 Building Plan: Original approved blue print of building plan

Approved bySy.No. with location

R.s.No.47 , Narsapur Municipality

R.s.No.47 , Narsapur Municipality

Plot Area 3901.70 sq.mtr 3901.70 sq.mtrArea earmarked for proposed course

The institution has submitted five building plans and submitted a statement of roomwise area i.e. B.Ed : 17463.57 sq.ft & proposed D.Ed 14950.12 sq.ft total built up area 32413.69 sq.ft

The institution has submitted two approved photocopy of building plans, built up : 396.27 sq.mtr & 11982.53 sq.ft

9 Non Encumbrance Certificate:Non-Encumbrance Certificate issu

NEC dt. 01.11.2011 Not submittedSy. No. with location.

47

Extent 334.1, 1422.28, 56.34, 983.48, 958.75, 15.16

Period 01.01.1983 to 31.10.20114

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

94


ed by the Sub-Registrar

10 Endowment Fund Original FDR of Rs. 5.00 Lakhs towards Endowment Fund held with nationalized bank for minimum period of 1 year for proposed course.

Issued from State Bank of Hyderabad

State Bank of India

FDR No. 96156 871731Tenure of FDR 5 years 72 monthsIssue of FDR 30.08.2011 13.06.2007Valid till 30.08.2016 21.03.2013In favor of Secretary &

Correspondent, Sri.Y.N.College of Education

Secretary & Correspondent, Sri.Y.N.College of Education

11 Reserved Fund Original FDR

Issued from State Bank of Hyderabad

Andhra Bank

FDR No. 961567 309635Tenure of FDR 5 years 72 monthsIssue of FDR 30.08.2011 13.06.2007Valid till 30.08.2016 21.03.2013In favor of Secretary &

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

95


of Rs. 3.00 Lakhs towards Reserved Fund held with nationalized bank for minimum period of 1 year for proposed course.

Correspondent, Sri.Y.N.College of Education

12 NAAC certificte

Not applicable for proposed course

Submitted NAAC Certificate with accredited at the A level(Page.No.89(a)

SRCAPP507-D.El.Ed course

The Committee considered the Appellate authority order dt. 03.01.2013 directing to further process as per NCTE Regulations and all other relevant documents of the institution, decided to reject the application for the following deficiencies still persist as under:

The society that get the land from the Andhra Pradesh Government and the society sponsoring the two – B.Ed & D.Ed colleges are different.

The society that got the land from the Andhra Pradesh Government does not have the power to transfer title (freehold or lease hold) to the two colleges.

Regulations 8 (7) (iv) of NCTE Regulations 2009 requires that within 6 months title must be transferred to the institution. This Regulations can not be fulfilled in this case.

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

96


Under the above grounds and with reference to the totality of information collected & based on a collective application of mind, the committee decided as per NCTE Regulations 2009, to reject the application of the institution for recognition of D.Ed course.

Further, APS08608 – B.Ed course

The Committee considered the matter and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under NCTE Act, for the following:

The institution does not have title to the land. Original certified copy of the land documents from Govt. authority is to be submitted. Notarised English version of the certified copy land documents is to be submitted.

In view of the above and with reference to the totality of information collected & based on a collective application of mind, the Committee decided to issue a Show cause Notice to the institution as to why the recognition be not withdrawn and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 21 days from the date of receipt of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the withdrawal of application for recognition, based on the records available, with no further notice.

New Application -2013-2014

43 SRCAPP80B.P.Ed

Jyothishmathi College of Physical

Education, Karimnagar

DistrictAP

Jyothishmathi College of Physical Education, Plot No.581, 582, 583, Ramakrishna Colony Village, Nustulapur Post Office, Thimmapur Taluk, Karimnagar District-505481, Andhra Pradesh

Juvvadi Educational Trust, Plot No.10-3-219, Vidyanagar Street, Karimnagar Village & Post Office, Karimnagar City & Taluk, Karimnagar District-505001, Andhra Pradesh had applied for grant of recognition to Jyothishmathi College of Physical Education, Plot No.581, 582, 583, Ramakrishna Colony Village, Nustulapur Post Office, Thimmapur Taluk, Karimnagar District-505481, Andhra Pradesh for D.El.Ed Course of two year duration under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online on 31.12.2012 and physical application has been received in the office of SRC on 04.01.2013 .



The Committee considered the reply of the institution dt.07-05-2013 to the


97


deficiency letter and all other relevant documents and decided to cause inspection under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, to examine whether the institution fulfils all the requirements as per the norms, for the proposed programme, subject to the condition that the deficiencies, if any, were duly rectified by the institution, as per the norms.

Note: The VT members to be informed to check in particular about other courses run in the premises.

44 SRCAPP44B.P.Ed

Annamacharya College of

Physical Education, Rangareddi

DistrictAP

Annamacharya College of Physical Education, Plot No.17/1/AA, National H W, Piglipur Village, Batasingaram Post Office, Hayath Nagar Taluk, Hyderabad City, Rangareddi District-501512, Andhra Pradesh

Annamacharya Educational Trust, Plot No.17/1/AA, National High Way-9, Piglipur Village, Batasingaram Post Office, Hayath Nagar Taluk, Hyderabad City, Rangareddi District-501512, Andhra Pradesh had applied for grant of recognition to Annamacharya College of Physical Education, Plot No.17/1/AA, National H W, Piglipur Village, Batasingaram Post Office, Hayath Nagar Taluk, Hyderabad City, Rangareddi District-501512, Andhra Pradesh for B.P.Ed Course of One year duration under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online on 31.12.2012 and physical application has been received in the office of SRC on 04.01.2013 .


The institution has replied to the deficiency letter on 06.05.2013

The Committee considered the reply of the institution dt.06-05-2013 to the deficiency letter and all other relevant documents and decided to cause inspection under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, to examine whether the institution fulfils all the requirements as per the norms, for the proposed programme, subject to the condition that the deficiencies, if any, were duly rectified by the institution, as per the norms.

45 SRCAPP199T.P.T.

SV Telugu Pandit

Training College,

Nizamabad District

AP

SV Telugu Pandit Training College, Sy.No.318, Plot No.7-30/1/A, Palwancha Village & Post Office, Machareddy Taluk, Kamareddy City, Nizamabad District-503111, Andhra Pradesh

Sri Vasavi Educational Society, Plot No.5-7-107, Sri Ram Nagar Colony, Kamareddy Village & Post Office, Kamareddy Taluk & City, Nizamabad District-503111, Andhra Pradesh had applied for grant of recognition to SV Telugu Pandit Training College, Sy.No.318, Plot No.7-30/1/A, Palwancha Village & Post Office, Machareddy Taluk, Kamareddy City, Nizamabad District-503111, Andhra Pradesh for T.P.T Course of one year duration under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online on 31.12.2012 and physical application has been received in the office of SRC on 07.01.2013.


(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

98



The Committee considered the reply of the institution dt.09-05-2013 to the deficiency letter and all other relevant documents and decided to cause inspection under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, to examine whether the institution fulfils all the requirements as per the norms, for the proposed programme, subject to the condition that the deficiencies, if any, were duly rectified by the institution, as per the norms.


MJR College of Elementary

Education, Nalgonda

DistrictAP

MJR College of Elementary Education, Plot/Khasara No.2-8, Street No.2, Marriguda Village and Post Office, Marriguda City and Taluk, Nalgonda District – 508245, Andhra Pradesh

MJR Educational Society, Plot No. 2-8, MDO Office Road, Marriguda Village and Post Office, Marriguda City and Taluk, Nalgonda District – 508245, Andhra Pradesh had applied for grant of recognition to MJR College of Elementary Education, Plot/Khasara No.2-8, Street No.2, Marriguda Village and Post Office, Marriguda City and Taluk, Nalgonda District – 508245, Andhra Pradesh for D.El.Ed Course of two year duration under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online on 30.12.2012 and physical application has been received in the office of SRC on 04.01.2013 .



The reply of the institution to the deficiency letter was duly considered and the reply is unconvincing and not satisfactory, deficiencies still persist as under:

Original certified copy of the land documents from Govt. authority i.e, sub-registrar is not submitted. Notarised English version of the certified copy land documents not submitted.

Notarised land usage certificate from the Revenue divisional office stating that the agriculture land converted to non-agriculture for the educational purpose is not submitted. Proceedings of Revenue Divisional Officer not submitted for conversion of land from agricultural to educational purposes.

Up-to-date encumbrance certificate issued by sub-registrar is not

submitted.

In the building completion certificate submitted, type of roofing at column no. 10 and the name of the proposed course at column no. 9 respectively is not mentioned.

Total earmarked built up area shown in building plan 3599 sq.mtrs and in building completion certificate 3087 sq.mtrs both are not matching.

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

99



Under the above grounds and with reference to the totality of information collected & based on a collective application of mind, the committee decided as per NCTE Regulations 2009, to reject the application of the institution for recognition of D.El.Ed course.

47 SRCAPP1960B.Ed-AI

Director of Distance

Education, Ranga Reddy

DistrictAP

Director of Distance Education, Plot / Khasara No. 211 & 212, Gachibowli Street and Post Office, Manikonda Village, Ranga Reddy Taluka and City, Ranga Reddy District – 500 032, Andhra Pradesh

Maulana Azad National Urdu University, Gachibowli Road and Post Office, Manikonda Village, Ranga Reddy Taluka and City, Ranga Reddy District – 500 032, Andhra Pradesh had applied for grant of recognition to Director of Distance Education, Plot / Khasara No. 211 & 212, Gachibowli Street and Post Office, Manikonda Village, Ranga Reddy Taluka and City, Ranga Reddy District – 500 032, Andhra Pradesh for B.Ed-AI Course of One year duration under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online on 28.12.2012 and physical application has been received in the office of SRC on 08.01.2013(speed post) dispatched on 02.01.2013.

The application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to Maulana Azad National Urdu University, Ranga Reddy District – 500 032 for their recommendation on 06.02.2013/28.03.2013 (Reminder).

A deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 05.04.2013 for the following deficiencies:

1) Certificate of Registration of Society / Trust and Bye-laws: - The university has not submitted the copies of the Certificate of Registration of Society / Trust and Bye-laws. Hence the university is required to submit registered copy of Certificate of Registration of Society / Trust and Bye-laws.

2) Certified copy of the registered land documents issued by the competent authority:- The University has submitted the copies of land transfer certificate issued by Secretary to Government dated 18.03.1998 and another copy of letter issued by Mandal Revenue Officer dated 24.07.1998 are not certified by the Sub Registrar and the University is required to submit Certified copy of Land alienation certificate issued by the Collector.

3) Approved building plan by the competent civil authority:- The university has submitted the copy of the building plan in A4 Size Sheets, it is not approved by competed authority and not mentioned details of Survey Number, plot area, the earmarked area for the proposed course. Hence it is required to submit fresh blue print and it should be clearly mentioning i.e. Khasara no, plot no, proposed course, total area, built up area duly approved by competent authority with resolution in all respect. If the institution is running other teacher education courses / other technical courses in the same premises, the university is required to mention earmarked area for proposed course with total area and built up area.

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

100


4) Building completion certificate: - The University is required to submit Fresh Building completion certificate in prescribed format issued by Govt. Engineer in prescribed format (copy enclosed).

5) Notarized copy of Change of land use Certificate issued by the competent authority: - The University is required to submit notarized copy of change of land use certificate (conversion of agricultural land to non agricultural / educational purpose) issued by the Revenue Department for all the survey nos.

6) Non-Encumbrance Certificate issued by the Sub-Registrar:- The University is required to submit up-to-date Non-Encumbrance Certificate issued by the Sub-Registrar for all Sy Nos.

7) Minority Certificate:- The University is minority institution as per application form, however the institution has not submitted minority certificate issued by Competent/non competent. Hence the institution is required to submit minority certificate issued by competent authority.

8) The University is already running B.Ed course recognized on 06.28.2007. As such as per provision of NCTE Regulation, 2009, the institution is required to complete three academic sessions for additional intake / additional course. Proof of the same is required to be provided.

In the meantime, the Maulana Azad National Urdu University in its letter dt. 18.04.2013 & 29.04.2013 stating as follows:-

“NOC from Andhra Pradesh State Government for sanctioning additional 500 seats to the B.Ed. (distance mode) programme being offered by the Directorate of Distance Education, Maulana Azad National Urdu University, Gachibowli, Hyderabad. Maulana Azad National University is a central University which is dual mode catering to the needs of both the regular and distance mode Urdu medium students across the country.The B.Ed distance mode programme is being offered by the Directorate of Distance Education, Maulana Azad National Urdu University since 2005 with due recognition from NCTE.Since Maulana Azad National Urdu University is a central University established by an Act of the Parliament, it does not fall under the jurisdiction of the Andhra Pradesh State Government. It has a national presence with head quarters in Hyderabad, A.P.The present B.Ed (distance mode) programme as well as the regular mode B.Ed of MANUU is offered in various parts of India since it is a national University. In the past also, no NOC from the State Government was required as a prerequisite to start any course.Therefore, since the B.Ed. AI (i.e. additional intake of 500 seats) is proposed to be started by a national and central university, the clause 7 of the NCTE Regulations 2009 is not applicable in the case the proposals by Directorate of Distance education.Hence, you are requested to waive the prerequisite of obtaining NOC from the Government of A.P. and grant permission to start B.Ed Additional Unit of 500 from this academic year.”

Note: The institution has not submitted D.L Reply till date (DL sent on 05.04.2013).


101


The Committee considered the matter and non-reply to the deficiency letter from the ‘Director of Distance Education” (SRCAPP1960) sent on 05.04.2013 and decided to await the reply to the deficiency letter.

Note: The Director of the institution to be informed to send the DL reply through Registrar of University, (MANUU).

48 SRCAPP1913B.Ed

E G S Pillay College of Education,

Nagapattinam District

TN

E G S Pillay College of Education, RS no. 163/1, 164/1, Thethi Village, Nagore Post, Nagapattinam Taluka, Nagapattinam District, Pin-611002, Tamilnadu

G S Pillay and Sons Charitable and Educational Trust, Plot no. 163/1, 164/1, Old Nagore Road, Thethi Village, Nagore Post, Nagapattinam Taluka, Nagapattinam District, Pin-611002, Tamilnadu had applied for grant of recognition to E G S Pillay College of Education, RS no. 163/1, 164/1, Thethi Village, Nagore Post, Nagapattinam Taluka, Nagapattinam District, Pin-611002, Tamilnadu for B.Ed Course of one year duration under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online on 27.12.2012 and physical application has been received in the office of SRC on 28.12.2012



The Committee considered the reply of the institution dt.26-04-2013 and all other relevant documents and decided to cause inspection under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, to examine whether the institution fulfils all the requirements as per the norms, for the proposed programme, subject to the condition that the deficiencies, if any, were duly rectified by the institution, as per the norms.

Note: The VT members to be informed at the time of inspection to check in particular about other courses being offered.)

49 SRCAPP1956B.Ed

Krishna College of Education,

Tiruvannamalai District

TN

Krishna College of Education, Khasara No.114/2B, 114/1E2, 92/3A, 92/3B, Street No.01, Plot No.114, Meyyur Village and Post Office, Tiruvannamalai City and Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District – 606753, Tamilnadu.

Krishna Trust, Plot No.114, Kallakurichi Main Road, Meyyur Village and Post Office, Tiruvannamalai City and Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District - 606753,Tamilnadu had applied for grant of recognition to Krishna College of Education, Khasara No.114/2B, 114/1E2, 92/3A, 92/3B, Street No.01, Plot No.114, Meyyur Village and Post Office, Tiruvannamalai City and Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District – 606753,Tamilnadu for B.Ed Course of one year duration under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online on 28.12.2012 and physical copy on 04.01.2013.

The application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State Government for recommendation on 05.02.2013 followed by reminder on

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

102


22.04.2013. A deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 22.04.2013.


The Committee considered the reply of the institution dt.06-05-2013 and all other relevant documents and decided to cause inspection under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, to examine whether the institution fulfils all the requirements as per the norms, for the proposed programme, subject to the condition that the deficiencies, if any, were duly rectified by the institution, as per the norms.

50 SRCAPP1821B.Ed

CSI Teacher Training Institute,

Salem DistrictTN

CSI Teacher Training Institute for Women Hasthampatty Salem, Plot/Khasara No. TS. No. 7 8/1B1, 8/2,11,18,19, Plot No. TS. No. 7PT, Street No. Cherry Road, Hasthampatty Village & Post Office, Salem Taluk & District, Pin-635201, Tamilnadu

CSI Teacher Training Institute for Women Salem, Plot No. TS. No. 7PT, Street/Road. Cherry Road, Hasthampatty Village & Post Office, Salem Taluk & District-636007, Tamilnadu had applied for grant of recognition to CSI Teacher Training Institute for Women Hasthampatty Salem, Plot/Khasara No. TS. No. 7 8/1B1, 8/2,11,18,19, Plot No. TS. No. 7PT, Street No. Cherry Road, Hasthampatty Village & Post Office, Salem Taluk & District, Pin-635201, Tamilnadu for B.Ed Course of one year duration under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online on 18.12.2012 and physical application has been received in the office of SRC on 19.12.2012.


Now, the institution has replied to the deficiency letter on 09.05.2013.


Original certified copy of the land documents from Govt. authority (sub-registrar) is not submitted.

Approved blue print of the building plan issued by competent civil authority is not submitted. The building plan submitted is not approved by the competent authority.

Original building completion certificate from competent Govt. engineer is not submitted. The BCC submitted is not approved by the competent authority.

Notarised land usage certificate from the Revenue divisional office stating that the agriculture land converted to non-agriculture for the educational purpose is not submitted. In the Land Use Certificate submitted is not notarised and the area of land converted from agricultural land to non-agricultural land is not mentioned.

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

103



Under the above grounds and with reference to the totality of information collected & based on a collective application of mind, the committee decided as per NCTE Regulations 2009, to reject the application of the institution for recognition of B.Ed course.

51 SRCAPP1941B.EdSri

Lakshminarayan College of

Education, Dharmapuri

DistrictTN

Sri Lakshminarayan College of Education, Plot/Khasara no. 16, Land Title/Street no. 16, Pappinaickanahalli Village, Sogathur Post, Dharmapuri Taluka, Dharmapuri District, Pin-636809, Tamilnadu

Sri Lakshminarayan Edu1cational Trust, Plot no. 4/426A, Vadivel Gounder Street, Dharmapuri Village and Post, Dharmapur Taluka and District, Pin-636702, Tamilnadu had applied for grant of recognition to Sri Lakshminarayan College of Education, Plot/Khasara no. 16, Land Title/Street no. 16, Pappinaickanahalli Village, Sogathur Post, Dharmapuri Taluka, Dharmapuri District, Pin-636809, Tamilnadu for B.Ed Course of one year duration under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online on 27.12.2012 and physical application has been received in the office of SRC on 28.12.2012.




Original certified copy of the land documents from Govt. authority (sub-registrar) is not submitted.

Notarised land usage certificate from the Revenue divisional office stating that the agriculture land converted to non-agriculture for the educational purpose is not submitted. In the Land Use Certificate submitted conversion from agricultural land to non-agricultural land is not mentioned.



52 SRCAPP1867B.Ed-AI

K S R College of Education,

Namakkal District

K S R College of Education, Khasara no. 207/1, 208/2, Erode Road, Kutchipalayam Village, K.S.R Kalvi Nagar, Tiruchengode Taluka, Namakkal District, Pin-637215, Tamilnadu

Rajammal Rangasamy Educational Trust, Plot no. 30 B, East Muniappan Koil Street, Tiruchengode Village and Post, Tiruchengode Taluka, Namakkal

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

104


TN District, Pin-637211, Tamilnadu had applied for grant of recognition to K S R College of Education, Khasara no. 207/1, 208/2, Erode Road, Kutchipalayam Village, K.S.R Kalvi Nagar, Tiruchengode Taluka, Namakkal District, Pin-637215, Tamilnadu for B.Ed-AI Course of one year duration under Section 15(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online on 24.12.2012 and physical application has been received in the office of SRC on 27.12.2012.

The application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State Government for recommendation on followed by reminder on 19.03.2013. A deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 19.03.2013.

Now, the institution has replied to the deficiency letter on 07.05.2013.


Approved blue print of the building plan issued by competent civil authority is not submitted. The institution has submitted photocopy of building plan in which the total land area is not mentioned. Earmarked area for the proposed course and existing courses are not shown.

Notarised land usage certificate from the Revenue divisional office stating that the agriculture land converted to non-agriculture for the educational purpose is not submitted.

Proof of completion of 3 academic sessions towards D.T.Ed & M.Ed courses which are already run by the institution from the affiliating body/State Govt/examining body is not submitted.


Under the above grounds and with reference to the totality of information collected & based on a collective application of mind, the committee decided as per NCTE Regulations 2009, to reject the application of the institution for recognition of B.Ed-Al course.

53 SRCAPP1903B.Ed

Meenakshi Chandrasekaran College of

Education, Thanjavur

DistrictTN

Meenakshi Chandrasekaran College of Education, Plot/Khasara no. 211/1, 211/2A, 208/1, 209/5, Street no. 7, Karambayam Village and Post, Pattukottai Taluka, Thanjavur District, Pin-614626, Tamilnadu

Sri Meenakshi Chandrasekaran Pillai Educational Trust, Plot no. 2851/16, Trichy Road, Thanjavur Village, V.O.C. Nagar Post, Thanjavur Taluka and District, Pin-613007, Tamilnadu had applied for grant of recognition to Meenakshi Chandrasekaran College of Education, Plot/Khasara no. 211/1, 211/2A, 208/1, 209/5, Street no. 7, Karambayam Village and Post, Pattukottai Taluka, Thanjavur District, Pin-614626, Tamilnadu for B.Ed Course of one year duration under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online on 26.12.2012 and physical application has been received in the office of SRC on 28.12.2012.

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

105




The reply of the institution to the deficiency letter was duly considered and the reply is unconvincing and not satisfactory, deficiencies still persist as under: Original building completion certificate from competent Govt. engineer is

not submitted.

Notarised land usage certificate from the Revenue divisional office stating that the agriculture land converted to non-agriculture for the educational purpose is not submitted. In the land usage certificate submitted, which is not in the proper format and conversion from agriculture to non-agriculture is not mentioned.



54 SRCAPP1889B.Ed-Al

Kongunadu College of Education,

Tiruchirapalli District

TN

Kongunadu College of Education, Plot/Khasara No. 2958, Street No. 283, Tholurpatty Village and Post Office, Thottiyam Taluk, Tiruchirapalli City and District, Pin – 621215, Tamilnadu.

Kongunadu Educational Charitable Trust, Plot No. 2958, Namakkal-Trichy Main Road, Tholurpatty Village and Post Office, Thottiyam Taluk, Tiruchirapalli City and District, Pin – 621215, Tamilnadu had applied for grant of recognition to Kongunadu College of Education, Plot/Khasara No. 2958, Street No. 283, Tholurpatty Village and Post Office, Thottiyam Taluk, Tiruchirapalli City and District, Pin – 621215,Tamilnadu for B.Ed-AI Course of one year duration under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online on 26.12.2012 and physical copy on 28.12.2012.





(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

106


In the building plan submitted, Plot area and total earmarked built up area is not mentioned.

Original building completion certificate in a proper format from competent Govt. engineer is not submitted.

Notarise English version of Up-to-date encumbrance certificate issued by sub-registrar is not submitted. In the encumbrance certificate submitted, total land area is not mentioned.

Proof of completion of 3 academic sessions towards B.Ed course which are already run by the institution from the affiliating body/State Govt/examining body is not submitted.


Under the above grounds and with reference to the totality of information collected & based on a collective application of mind, the committee decided as per NCTE Regulations 2009, to reject the application of the institution for recognition of B.Ed-Al course.

55 SRCAPP156B.P.Ed

KVM College of Physical Education, Rangareddi

DistrictAP

KVM College of Physical Education, Plot No.636, Kulakcherla Village & Post Office, Parigi Taluk & City, Rangareddi District-509335, Andhra Pradesh

Vivekananda Educational Society, Plot No.7-85, Kalyananagar, Kulakcherla Village, Post Office & City, Rangareddi District-509335, Andhra Pradesh had applied for grant of recognition to KVM College of Physical Education, Plot No.636, Kulakcherla Village & Post Office, Parigi Taluk & City, Rangareddi District-509335, Andhra Pradesh for B.P.Ed Course of One year duration under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online on 31.12.2012 and physical application has been received in the office of SRC on 04.01.2013 .


Now, the institution has replied to the deficiency letter on 10.05.2013.The Committee considered the reply of the institution dt.10-05-2013 and all other relevant documents and decided to cause inspection under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, to examine whether the institution fulfils all the requirements as per the norms, for the proposed programme, subject to the condition that the deficiencies, if any, were duly rectified by the institution, as per the norms.

Show Cause Notice Reply

56 SRCAPP1073D.E.C.Ed-AIGourishetty Venkataiah Memorial College of

Gourishetty Venkataiah Memorial College of Education, Plot No 3-7-918A, Street no. 1Karimnagar Village and Post office, Karimnagar Taluk and City, Karimnagar District –505 001, Andhra Pradesh

The Karimnagar Education Society, Plot No 3-7-918A, Jagitail road, Karimnagar Village and Post office, Karimnagar Taluk and City, Karimnagar

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

107


Education, Karimnagar

DistrictAP

District –505 001, Andhra Pradesh had applied for grant of recognition to Gourishetty Venkataiah Memorial College of Education, Plot No 3-7-918A, Street no. 1Karimnagar Village and Post office, Karimnagar Taluk and City, Karimnagar District –505 001, Andhra Pradesh for D.E.C.Ed-A.I Course of two years duration under Section 15(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online on 29.09.2011 and physical application has been received in the office of SRC on 30.09.2011.


The Southern Regional Committee in its 221st meeting held on 19th – 20th

April 2012 considered the reply of the institution dt. 01.03.2102 and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under Section 14(1) of NCTE Act. Accordingly, a show cause notice was issued on 15/05/2012. Institution has submitted its written representations on 06.06.2012.

The institution has submitted reply for Show Cause Notice after the expiry of stipulated time of 21 days period as per clause 14(1) of NCTE Regulations.

The Southern Regional Committee in its 224th meeting held on 14th , 15th and 16th

June 2012, considered the reply of the institution, which is received on 06-06-2012, i.e., after 22 (Twenty two) days from the date of issue of show cause notice dt. 15/05/2012 and with reference to the totality of information collected & based on a collective application of mind, the committee decided as per NCTE Regulations 2009, to refuse and reject the application of the institution for recognition of D.El.Ed-Al course.

Accordingly, a rejection order was issued to the institution on 06.07.2012.

The institution filed a writ petition in the Hon’ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh ,W. P. No. 25142 and the Hon’ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh in its order has stated that ‘.. the respondent no.2 is directed to consider the petitioner’s applications afresh treating the replies filed by them as having been sent within the stipulated time of 21 days and communicate its decision to the petitioners within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of this order’

In obedience to the Andhra Pradesh High Court order (W.P.No 25142), the application was processed and placed before SRC in its 232nd Meeting held on 29th-31st August, 2012 and the committee considered the Hon’ble High court order and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Final Show cause Notice under section 14 (1) NCTE Act.

Accordingly, a final show cause notice was issued to the institution on 12/.10.2012. The institution has submitted written representation on 02/11/2012.

The SRC in its 235th Meeting held on 21st – 22nd November, 2012 considered the reply of the institution vide letter dt. 02.11.2012 and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act.

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

108


Accordingly, a show cause notice was issued to the institution on 19/12/2012. The institution has submitted written representation on. 07/01/2013,

The SRC in its 240th meeting held on 9th-11th March 2013, considered the reply of the institution vide letter dt. 07.01.2012 and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under section 14 of NCTE Act, for the following:

As per the on-line application, the institution has applied for D.E.C.Ed – Al course. No D.E.C.Ed course is offered anywhere in the Andhra Pradesh region. The institution without applying for basic unit of D.E.C.Ed course (No where in the region this course is offered) has directly applied for D.E.C.Ed – Al Course.

The institution in their reply vide letter dt. 07/01/2013 has requested in point NO. 9 to grant recognition to Additional intake, which is not permissible as per NCTE Regulations 2009, as the institution has not applied for basic course D.E.C.Ed (No where in the region this course is offered).

The institution kept silent at the time of rejection and on receipt of rejection order wherein the course name is inadvertently mentioned by this office as D.El.Ed-Al instead of D.E.C.Ed-Al, even though the institution is well aware of the fact they applied for D.E.C.Ed-Al course for the session 2012-13 instead of D.El.Ed – Al course. Further, the institution has not brought this fact to the Hon’ble Court and kept the Court in dark.

As per 8 (2) & (3) Condition for grant of recognition of NCTE Regulations 2009, which states:

(2) In the first instance, an institution shall be considered for grant of recognition of only one course for the basic unit as prescribed in the norms and standards for the particular teacher education programme.

(3) An institution can apply for one basic unit only of an additional course or for an additional unit of the existing recognised course after completion of three academic sessions of the respective course, for which the institution shall submit application before the cut off date prescribed for submission of applications in the year succeeding the completion of three academic sessions. Maximum intake capacity of an institution taking into consideration of all courses, along with additional intake, in any case, shall not exceed 300.

Accordingly, a show cause notice was issued to the institution on 19.04.2013. The institution submitted its written representation on 06.05.2013.

The Committee considered the matter and reply of the institution vide letter dt. 06.05.2013 to the show cause notice issued. The reply of the institution is not convincing and unsatisfactory:

The institution applied as per on-line application for D.E.C.Ed-Al course only for the session 2012-13. In the first instance the institution is not having D.E.C.Ed basic unit and can not apply for Additional course of D.E.C.Ed as per 8 (2) & (3) of NCTE Regulations 2009. In fact, D.E.C.Ed course is not

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

109


offered anywhere in the region of Andhra Pradesh.

Based on the above, the committee decided that the question of considering this application does not, therefore, arise.

57 SRCAPP580D.El.EdVishwa

Bharathi D.Ed College,

Ranga Reddy District

AP

Vishwa Bharathi D.Ed College, Sy No. 197/AA, Urellaroad, Devuni Erravally Village and Post Office, Chevella Taluka, Chevella City, Ranga Reddy – 501503, Andhra Pradesh

SVR Educational Development Society, H No. 9-4-84/9, Above Corporation Bank, Kakatiya Nagar & Post Office, Mehdipatnam, Hyderabad Taluka, Hyderabad District – 500028, Andhra Pradesh had applied for grant of recognition to Vishwa Bharathi D.Ed College, Sy No. 197/AA, Urellaroad, Devuni Erravally Village and Post Office, Chevella Taluka, Chevella City, Ranga Reddy District – 501503, Andhra Pradesh for D.El.Ed course of two year duration under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online on 21.09.2011 and physical application has been received in the office of SRC on 22.09.2011.

The application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State Government for recommendation on 27.09.2011 followed by a remainder on 08.12.2012. A deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 08.12.2011. The institution had replied to the deficiency letter on 08.02.2012. Recommendation from State Government is not received.

The SRC in its 218th meeting of SRC held on February 2012 considered the reply for deficiency letter and other relevant documents submitted by the institution and decided to cause inspection at the premises to examine whether the institution fulfills all the requirements as per the norms and to ascertain infrastructural and instructional facilities available at the premises for the proposed course.

Accordingly, the inspection of the institution was fixed between 19 th-23rd March 2012 and the same was intimated to the institution on 13.03.2012. Accordingly inspection of the institution was conducted on 19.03.2012.

The SRC in its 221st meeting held on 19-20 April 2012, considered the VT report, VCD and all other relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice.


The reply of the institution to the show cause notice was duly considered by SRC in its 224th meeting held on 16th and 17th June 2012, and the reply is unconvincing and not satisfactory, deficiencies still persist as under:

1. As per VCD, the front full view of the building is not shown, entrance to the building looks like Godown only. Window shutters not fixed in first floor and the building construction is incomplete. No windows in frontage, lack of ventilation and building is not suitable for education purpose.

2. As per VT report total built up area is 16881 sq.ft, whereas the total

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

110


outcome as per essential data sheet of page No. 5 is 7468 sq.ft only.

3. As seen from VCD, all class rooms are having temporary partition walls, which is not permissible.

4. As per BCC, there are two buildings, one building consists of Ground + 1st

floor and 2nd building consists of 1 +2 floors, where as in VCD only one building with Ground + 1st floor is shown; which is incomplete. The management/institution is trying to mislead NCTE & trying to suppress the correct information.

Under the above grounds and with reference to the totality of information collected & based on a collective application of mind, the Committee has decided as per NCTE Regulations 2009, to refuse and reject the application of the institution for recognition of D.El.Ed course.

Accordingly, rejection order was issued to the institution on 11.07.2012.

Mean time, this office received a fax letter from Shri. Madhava Rao, Advocate on 28.07.2012 stating that the institution has filed Court case in W.P.No. 29412 of 2012 in the Hon’ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh as follows:

“ the institution has filed writ without filing Appeal before the appellate authority (New Delhi) thus the Petitioner institution is directed to file appeal and the appellate authority in New Delhi is directed to dispose of the appeal within 3 weeks from the date of receipt of the order”.

Accordingly, the institution preferred appeal to NCTE, Hqrs on 22.08.2012 and the Appellate Authority vide order no. F.No. 89-473/2012 Appeal/9 th Meeting- 2012 has stated as follows:

“after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT report and after considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that there was adequate ground to remand the case to the SRC for re-inspection of the institution after obtaining payment of Rs. 40,000/- from the institution and for taking further decision thereafter.

Now therefore, the Council hereby remands back the case of Vishwa Bharathi D.Ed College, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh to the SRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above”.

The SRC in its 236th meeting held on 16-18th December 2012 considered the Appellate authority order dt. 09/10/2012 and all other relevant documents and decided to cause Re-inspection under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, to examine whether the institution fulfils all the requirements as per the norms, for the proposed programme, subject to the condition that the deficiencies, if any, were duly rectified by the institution, as per the norms, after collection of balance inspection fee.

The inspection of the institution was fixed between 15-19 thJanuary 2013. The

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

111


same was intimated to the institution on 08.01.2013. The inspection was conducted on 16.01.2013. The VT report was received by SRC on 21.01.2013.

The SRC in its 241st meeting held on 29th-31st March 2013 & 1st April 2013, considered the VT report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under Section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, for the following:

1. Total built up area is not matching with Building completion certificate, building plan and VT report. As per, Building completion certificate built up area is 16574.28 sq.ft, building plan built up area is 2176.50 sq.mts and as per VT report, built up area is 19500 sq.ft.

2. The institution has not submitted original FDRs.

3. The institution has not submitted Re-inspection fee of Rs. 50000/- as per Appellate Authority order.

In the meanwhile, the institution has submitted its written representation on 25.04.2013(with reference to website minutes of 241st meeting of SRC).

On careful perusal of the original file of the institution, reply of the institution, all relevant documents and other related documents, Act of NCTE, 1993, Regulations and guidelines of NCTE published from time to time laid on the table, the Regional Committee decided to issue Letter of Intent for grant of recognition to D.Ed course of two year duration with an annual intake of 50(Fifty only)(one unit) subject to the appointment of qualified staff through duly constituted selection committee as per the Norms of NCTE/State Government/Affiliating University and be given effect before the commencement of the academic session.

58 APS05193D.T.Ed

JNN Teacher Training Institute, Tiruvallur District

TN

JNN Teacher Training Institute, No. 51, Bypass Road, Red Hills, Tiruvallur District, Pin-600052, Tamilnadu

Alamelu Ammal Educational Trust, Chennai, Tamilnadu had submitted an application under the name and style of JNN Teacher Training Institute, No. 51, Bypass Road, Red Hills, Tiruvallur District, Pin-600052, Tamilnadu for seeking grant of recognition for D.T.Ed Course on 02.01.2006. The institution was granted recognition on 23.12.2006 with an annual intake of 50 students, with the condition to shift to its own premises within 3 years.

The institution vide its letter dt.11.07.2011 stated that they had submitted Demand Draft of Rs. 40.000/- in April, 2010 for shifting of premises. It was confirmed from accounts section that D.D was already deposited. Since the name of institution appeared in the shifting list & institution which had proposed shifting to its own premises. The inspection of the institution was conducted on 13.08.2011.

The SRC in its 211th meeting held on 21st-23rd September, 2011 considered the VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and decided to serve Show Cause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act. Accordingly, a Show cause notice was issued to the institution on 24.11.2011. The institution had submitted its written representation on 21.11.2011.

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

112


The SRC in its 215th meeting held on 12th-13th December, 2011,considered the written reply and other relevant documents and decided to cause composite inspection at the premises Under Section 17 of NCTE Act. The institution is directed to submit the certain documents within 30 days of the receipt of the notice, Duly filled in Questionnaire along with all the necessary documents for land, Original building plan, original Affidavit and other relevant documents, along with inspection fee of Rs. 40,000/. Accordingly, the inspection of the institution was fixed between 29th to 31st January, 2012 and 1st February 2012. The same was intimated to the institution on 23.01.2012. The inspection of the institution was conducted on 10.04.2012.

The SRC in its 224th meeting held on 14th-16th June, 2012 considered the VT report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show Cause Notice under NCTE Act. Accordingly, a Show cause notice was issued to the institution on 06.07.2012. The institution had submitted its written representation on 17.09.2012.

The SRC in its 237th meeting held on 05th-06th January, 2013 considered the written representation of the institution vide letter dt. 17.09.2012 and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under NCTE Act. Accordingly, a Show Cause Notice was issued to the institution on 18.02.2013. The institution had submitted its written representation on 08.03.2013 alongwith inspection fee DD bearing no. 198618 dtd. 07.03.2013 for Rs. 40,000/-

The Committee considered the written reply of the institution vide letter dt. 08.03.2013 on the above matter and also the relevant documents of the institution and decided to withdraw recognition for the following reasons:-

Original certified copy of the land documents from Govt. authority (sub-Registrar) is not submitted.

Approved blue print of the building plan issued by competent civil authority is not submitted.

Original FDRs of Rs. 5 & 3 lacs towards endowment and reserve fund from a Nationalised Bank in joint account is not submitted.

Duly approved staff list as per NCTE norms, for D.T.Ed and B.Ed course is not submitted.

Based on the above points the committee decides to withdraw the recognition of the D.T.Ed (APS05193) & B.Ed (APS04870) course run by the JNN Teacher Training Institute, No. 51, Bypass Road, Red Hills, Tiruvallur District, Tamilnadu & K.J.N. Education College, Old No. 24, New No.2, 17th

street, Annanagar West, Chennai (of the same trust managed by Alamelu Ammaal Educational Trust) from the academic year 2013-14, in order to enable the ongoing batch of students in D.T.Ed & B.Ed, course, if any, to complete their course.


The Affiliating body / Examining board / body be informed accordingly.


113


Further decided to return Endowment funds and Reserve fund deposited with SRC NCTE, Bangalore, if any.

59 SRCAPP1041D.El.Ed-AIBest D.Ed

College, West Godavari District

AP

Best D.Ed College, Khasara No. 737/1, 742/1A, Plot No. 2/152B, K.N. Road, Tadepalli Village, Tadepalliguden Post & Taluk, West Godavari District, Pin – 534101, Andhra Pradesh.

Bhushan Educational Society of Tadepalliguden, Plot No. 2-153/B, K.N.Road, Tadepalli Vilalge, Tadepalligudem Post & Taluk, West Godavari District, Pin- 534101, Andhra Pradesh had applied for grant of recognition to Best D.Ed College, Khasara No. 737/1, 742/1A, Plot No. 2/152B, K.N. Road, Tadepalli Village, Tadepalliguden Post & Taluk, West Godavari District, Pin – 534101, Andhra Pradesh for D.El.Ed - AI Course of two years duration under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online on 29.09.2011 and physical application has been received in the office of SRC on 03.10.2011.

The application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State Government for recommendation on 02.11.2011 / 09.12.2011 (Reminder). A deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 29.12.2011. The institution has replied to the deficiency letter on 28.02.2012.

The SRC in its 220th meeting held on 30th-31st March, 2012 has considered the reply of the institution dt. 28.02.2012 and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice. Accordingly Show Cause Notice was issued to the institution on 24.05.2012. The institution submits its written representation on 17.05.2012.

The SRC in its 223rd Meeting held on 29th-31st May 2012 has considered the reply of the institution dt.17-05-2012 and all other relevant documents and decided to cause inspection under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, to examine whether the institution fulfils all the requirements as per the norms, for the proposed programme, subject to the condition that the deficiencies, if any, were duly rectified by the institution, as per the norms. Accordingly, inspection of the institution was fixed between 25th to 29th June, 2012 the same was intimated to the institution on 22/06/2012 the inspection of the institution was conducted on 02/07/2012

The SRC in its 228th Meeting held on 24th-25th Meeting held on July, 2012 has considered VT report of D.El.Ed-Al course (SRCAPP1041) and decided to await composite inspection report of APS0363 B.Ed course also for further taking decision.

Accordingly, the composite inspection for APS00363 & SRCAPP1041 of the institution has been carried out on 11/08/2012. The decision for SRCAPP1041 was also kept pending till the receipt of composite inspection report.

The institution in its letter dated 31/08/2012 stated that “ the request your esteemed presence to clear our pending file for D.El.Ed additional intake which was kept in abeyance for the sake of our B.Ed (Code:0363) composite inspection.

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

114


As the composite inspection is over we request you to kindly grant the recognition for D.El.Ed additional intake for this academic year”.

The composite inspection report is placed in APS00363, the SRC in its 231st

Meeting held on 22nd-23rd August, 2012 decided to issue show cause notice for B.Ed but incase of SRCAPP 1041 the decision was not taken.

The reply to show cause notice for B.Ed was placed before SRC in its 233 rd

Meeting held on 26th-28th September, 2012 and it has decided to put up all 3 cases SRCAPP1041, APS00363 & APS02532. (Best College of Education) Recognition was withdrawn for B.Ed course on 15/12/2011. The institution preferred an appeal to the NCTE-Hqrs and the appellate authority in its order dated 18/04/2012. “remanding the case to the SRC for causing inspection of the institution and taking further decision thereafter. The institution directed to send to the SRC a D.D. of Rs. 50.000/- and affidavit on Rs.100/- stamp paper the format of SRC immediately”.

The matter was placed before SRC in its 222nd Meeting held on 09th-10th May 2012, the SRC decided to cause inspection of the institution on submission of Rs. 50.000/- inspection fee and an affidavit in the prescribed form on Rs.100/- stamp paper duly attested by oath commissioner or notary public and related supporting documents as per the regulations.

The institution has submitted Rs. 50.000/- inspection fee along with original affidavit.

The matter was placed before SRC in its 228 th Meeting held on 24th -25th July, 2012, the SRC decided to cause composite inspection under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, and to process along with SRCAPP 1041 D.Ed-Al course and to examine whether the institution fulfils all the requirements as per the norms, for the proposed programme, subject to the condition that the deficiencies, if any, were duly rectified by the institution, as per the norms.

Accordingly, composite inspection was conducted on 11.08.2012.

The visiting team report was placed before SRCs 231st meeting held on 22nd-23rd

August, 2012, the SRC decided to serve Show cause Notice.

As per the NCTE website information the institution has submitted written representation on 31/08/2012.

The matter was placed before SRC in its 233rd Meeting held on 26th-28th

September, 2012. The SRC directed to putup all 3 cases SRCAPP1041, APSO0363 & APS02532, in the next SRC meeting.

The SRC considered the composite inspection report, reply of the institution and other relevant documents, along with the original file of the institution and decided to continue recognition to APS00363-B.Ed.

On careful perusal of the original file of the institution, reply of the institution, all relevant documents and other related documents, Act of NCTE, 1993, Regulations and guidelines of NCTE published from time to time laid on the table,

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

115


the Regional Committee in its 234th meeting held on 17th and 18th October 2012 has decided to issue Letter of Intent for grant of recognition to D.El.Ed-Al course of two year duration with an annual intake of 50(Fifty only)(one unit) for the academic year 2012-13 subject to the appointment of qualified staff through duly constituted selection committee as per the Norms of NCTE/State Government/Affiliating University and be given effect before the commencement of the academic session.

Accordingly, a Letter of Intent was issued to the institution on 25.10.2012. The institution has submitted its reply to LOI on 21.11.2012 and 12.12.2012.

The SRC in its 236th meeting held on 16th – 18th December 2012 has considered the reply of the institution and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Notice Under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act for the following:

The institution has not appointed lecturer in Maths and Lectuer in foundation courses with proper qualification.

Accordingly, notice was issued to the institution on 28.01.2013. The institution has submitted its reply on 21.02.2013.

The SRC in its 241st Meeting held on 29th – 30th March and 1st April, 2013 considered the reply of the institution vide letter dt. 21.02.2013, and decided to await submission of revised approved staff list for both D.Ed and D.Ed-Al.

Accordingly, a letter was issued to the institution on 04.05.2013 with direction to submit the documents within 15 days.

Now, a letter was received from the institution on 13.05.2013

The committee considered the matter and also the reply from the institution towards the revised staff list, the reply is unconvincing and not satisfactory, deficiencies still persist as under:

The revised staff list shows the required number of staff for D.Ed and D.Ed-Al. But, 2 members of the basic unit (D.Ed) are not qualified as per NCTE norms.


Under the above grounds and with reference to the totality of information collected & based on a collective application of mind, the committee decided as per NCTE Regulations 2009, to withdraw LOI issued to the institution and reject the application of the institution for recognition of D.Ed-Al course.

Further, the Committee considered the written reply of the institution on the above matter and also the relevant documents of the institution and decided to withdraw recognition for the following reasons:-

The revised staff list shows the required number of staff for D.Ed and D.Ed-Al. But, 2 members of the basic unit (D.Ed) are not qualified as per NCTE norms.

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

116


Based on the above points the committee decides to withdraw the recognition of the D.Ed (APS02532) course run by the Best D.Ed College, , K.N. Road, Tadepalli Village, Tadepalliguden Post, West Godavari District – 534 101,, Andhra Pradesh from the academic year 2013-14, in order to enable the ongoing batch of students in D.Ed, course, if any, to complete their course.



60 SRCAPP1198B.Ed

Mother Theresa College,

Khammam District

AP

Mother Theresa College of B.Ed, K.No.20/45, Gandhinagar Village, Bhadrachalam Taluka & Town, Khammam District-507111, Andhra Pradesh

Savior Educational Society, H.No.1-50, Pinapaka Pattinagar, Burgamphad Taluka & Town, Khammam District-507114, Andhra Pradesh had applied for grant of recognition to Mother Theresa College of B.Ed, K.No.20/45, Gandhinagar Village, Bhadrachalam Taluka & Town, Khammam District-507111, Andhra Pradesh for D.El.Ed Course of two years duration under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online on 29.09.2011 and physical application has been received in the office of SRC on 03.10.2011.

The application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State Government for recommendation on 03.11.2011 / 22.12.2011 (Reminder). A deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 30.12.2011. The institution has replied to the deficiency letter on 27.02.2012.

The SRC in its 220th meeting held on 30-31st March 2012, considered the reply of the institution dt. 27.02.2012 and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve show cause notice under section 14(1) of NCTE Act.

Accordingly, a show cause notice was issued to the institution on 26.04.2012. The institution has submitted its written representation on 17.05.2012.

The reply of the institution to the show cause notice was duly considered by SRC in its 223rd Meeting held on 29th-31st May, 2012 the reply is unconvincing and not satisfactory, deficiencies still persist as under:

The institution has not submitted valid minority certificate issued by the competent authority from the State Govt. as B.Ed is banned in the State of Andhra Pradesh.

The institution has applied with the same society name for two courses, Viz: 1) SRCAPP1198 & 2) SRCAPP1181 for academic session 2012-2013 in the same District. Applying for more than one course in the same Sy.No.20/45, same location is not permissible as per NCTE regulations 2009.


Under the above grounds and with reference to the totality of information collected & based on a collective application of mind, the committee decided as per NCTE

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

117


Regulations 2009, to refuse and reject the application of the institution for recognition of B.Ed course.

Accordingly, rejection order was issued to the institution on 27/06/2012.

The institution preferred an appeal to NCTE-Hqrs and the appellate authority vide order no. F.No.89-460/2012 Appeal/9th Meeting-2012 dated 20.10.2012 has stated as follows:

“after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the council concluded that there was adequate justification to remand the case to the SRC for further processing as per the NCTE Regulations.”

The SRC in its 235th Meeting held on 20th-21st November, 2012 considered the appellate authority order dated 10/10/2012 and has decided to process the application.

The SRC in its 237th meeting held on 5th-6th January 2013, considered the VT report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act.

Accordingly, a show cause notice was issued to the institution on 26.02.2013. The institution has submitted its written representation on 15.03.2013.

The reply of the show cause notice was placed before SRC in its 242nd Meeting held on 14th-16th April, 2013 considered the matter and advised southern regional office to re-submit in next SRC meeting.

Accordingly, as per decision of SRC comparative statement placed before SRC in its 243rd meeting held on 29th-30th April 2013, the committee considered the matter and advised to SRO to put up in the next SRC meeting.

As per decision of SRC, comparative statement of four cases (i.e. SRCAPP1134-D.El.Ed, SRCAPP1198-B.Ed, SRCAPP1160-D.El.Ed, SRCAPP1181-B.Ed) placed before SRC in its 244th meeting held on 9th-11th May 2013, the Committee considered the matter and decided to SRCAPP1134 was rejected on 12.10.2012, SRCAPP1181 was rejected (as withdraw) on 30th-31st May 2012, SRCAPP1160 was rejected on 30th March – 1st April 2013, SRCAPP1198 to process and put up.

The Committee considered the reply of the institution vide letter dt. 15.03.2013 to the show cause notice and the reply is unconvincing and not satisfactory, deficiencies still persist as under:


Up-to-date encumbrance certificate issued by sub-registrar is not submitted.


(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

118



Complaint Cases

61 APS05398D.Ed

New Model College of

Elementary Education, Cuddapa District

AP

New Model College of Elementary Education, siddavatam , Cuddapa District, Andhra PradeshSri Sai Educational Society, Kadapa District-516001, Andhra Pradesh has submitted an application to the Southern Regional Committee of NCTE for grant of recognition to New Model College of Elementary Education, siddavatam , Cuddapa District, Andhra Pradesh for D.Ed course recognition order was issued to the institution on 22/04/2008 for D.Ed course of two years duration with an annual intake of 50 students.

Meantime, an abstract received from the Government of Andhra Pradesh dated 01/07/2011 received on 15/07/2011 stating that “…they have admitted extra students in D.Ed, 1st year after completion of 3rd phase DIETCE-2010 counseling during the academic year 2010-2011. But in the 4 th phase counseling, the convener DIETCET-2010 have allotted students to the vacant seats of their colleges under category-A seats and requested the government to accord permission for the extra seats for the year 2010-2011 as a special case”.The representation was placed before SRC in its 209th Meeting held on 31st July, 2011, and the committee has decided to issue show cause notice to the institution.

Accordingly, show cause notice was issued to the institution on 07/10/2011. The institution has submitted its written representation on 11/11/2011.

The reply of the institution was placed before SRC in its 218 th Meeting held on 218th Meeting held on 28 February, 2012 and the committee considered the matter and decided that, in view of the condonation ordered by the State Govt. SRC may warn the erring institution and require them to give an undertaking that there will be no recurrence of such a lapse.

Accordingly, a letter was issued to the institution on 06/06/2012.

Now, a complaint has been received from Shri. B. Kishore Kumar, Staff Reporter, Zee 24 Hour TV Channel, D.No. 42/585-3, Behind Gate of Saraswathi Vidyalayam, N.G.O. Colony, Kadapa District-516002, Andhra Pradesh on 30/04/2013 & 02/05/2013 stating that “… the new model college of Education & Diet college was initially established in Siddavattam in Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh at the following address in the year 2005-06 R.S. Nagar, Eguvapeta Siddavattam Post & Mandal, Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh this college functioned at the above address up to 2007-2008. There after this college was unauthorisedly shifted to D.No. 20/864 Radha Krishna Nagar, Co-Operative Colony, Kadapa in the year 2008 and is functioning at this address regularly till now. This fact was brought to the notice authorities several times, but in vain. In spite of complaint several times, the above concerned authorities have not taken any action against the college for its illegal functioning at the place other than the sanctioned place since 2008”.

The Committee considered the non-reply of the institution to the SRC letter


119


dt. 06.06.2012 on the above matter and also the relevant documents of the institution and decided to withdraw recognition for the following reasons:-

The Committee in its 218th meeting held on 28th Feb, 2012 considered the condonation ordered by the State Govt. and decided to warn the erring institution and an undertaking was sought from the institution that there will be no recurrence of such a lapse ( regarding admission of extra students in D.Ed 1st year as per letter received from Government of Andhra Pradesh dt. 01/07/2011).

Accordingly, a letter was issued to the institution on 06/06/2012. But, so far the institution has not submitted any reply nor given any undertaking towards recurrence of such lapse.

Based on the above points the committee decides to withdraw the recognition of the D.Ed (APS05398) course run by the New Model College of Elementary Education, Siddavatam, Cuddapa District, Andhra Pradesh from the academic year 2013-14, in order to enable the ongoing batch of students in D.Ed, course, if any, to complete their course.



62 APS07308B.Ed

Adhrsha College of Education,

Narayanpet, Mahabubnag

ar,AP

Adarsha College of Education, Adarsha Hills, Narayanpet, Mahabubnagar-509210, Andhra Pradesh.

Adarsha Educational Society, Mahabubnagar District, Andhra Pradesh was granted recognition in the name and style of Adarsha College of Education, Adarsha Hills, Narayanpet, Mahabubnagar-509210, Andhra Pradesh for offering B.Ed course of one year duration with an annual intake of 100 students on 16/10/2007.

The SRC in its 244th Meeting held on 9th-11th May, 2013, the committee has considered the reply of the institution dated 29/04/2013 has decided to reject application for D.El.Ed and examine the B.Ed case and submit separately link the D.El.Ed file.

As per the decision of SRC, the B.Ed case is examined.

As per the decision of the SRC in its 244th meeting held on 9-11th May, 2013, the B.Ed file case is examined and is put up by linking to D.Ed file (SRCAPP920).

The Committee considered the above matter and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under NCTE Act, for the following:

Two lease deeds submitted for 33 years with different sy.no. 228, 454/E/1,


120


at vallamapally and Narayanpet in the favour of Adarsha Educational Society.

In the building plan it is mentioned that existing premises bearing No. 1-5-30/4 belonging to (1) Sri. K. Srinivas s/o Sri. K. Narayana (2) Sri. Raghavendra Chary s/o Sri. Venkatapathi Chary (3) Sri. Sidda Ramappa S/O Sri. Sugappa (4) Sri. Venkat Rama Reddy S/o Sri. Chinna Rai Reddy (5) Sri. Sanga Sheshadri S/o Sri. Pedda Buggappa (6) Sri. Gal Reddy Bhasker Reddy S/o Sri. Narayan Reddy (7) Sri. Patike Sathyanaraya rao S/O Sri. Vithal Rao (8) Sri. Cham Raj S/o Prem Raj (9) Sri. Sangam Nath S/o sri. Sugappa (10) sri. P. Srinivas S/O Sri. Narsimulu (11) Sri. Sanga Bal Narayana S/o Sri. Buggappa in the building plan only Rooms mentioned there is no multipurpose hall & proposed course, institution name, name of the society & Sy.No is not mentioned – building plan is not for institution.

In the affidavit (as per page no. 62) it is stated that the society has acquired the properties by virtue registered irrevocable Settlement deeds executed by Sri. K. Srinivas s/o K. Narayana-but settlement deed not submitted.

Building completion certificate is not submitted.

In the land use certificate mentioned that 5 acres lease to Sri. P. Srinivasulu S/o P. Narsimulu, Correspondent Adarsha Educational Society, it is in individual name.

Location of land and building is different.

Experience Certificate, P.hd certificate and joining report of the principal not submitted.

Encumbrance Certificate is not submitted.

The institution has submitted website address as www.adarshacollegeofeducation.org the website of the institution has been checked and it shows Adarsha College of Education, Dehra (Panipet) and not for Teacher Training institute.

In view of the above and with reference to the totality of information collected & based on a collective application of mind, the Committee decided to issue a Show cause Notice to the institution as to why the recognition be not withdrawn and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 21 days from the date of receipt of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the withdrawal of application for recognition, based on the records available, with no further notice.

(S.Sathyam)

Chairman

121

http://www.adarshacollegeofeducation.org/