south texas, units 1 and 2, revision 18 to updated final ... › docs › ml1620 ›...
TRANSCRIPT
UJFSAR
Secltion 4.3
2
3
~
5
6
7
goo 8
9
10
II
12
13
~~
15
R P N M L K J H G FE 0 C 8 A
D FIRST CORE REGION I
Ill REGION 2
REG ION 3
180°
2700
00 3 Region Reload Core
ONCE OR TWICE BURNED FUEL
O~r.E OR TWICE BURNED FUEL
FRESH FUEL
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2
FUEL LOADING ARRANGEMENT
Figure 4.3-1 Revision 0
9
8 -~ ..... ::::E 7 -en ::..:: -en 6 ~ CL 0 ..... 0 en
5 a:: ~ ::r:: <.:J
~ ::r:: / 7 u.. 0
3 z: 0
..... I (.)
I ~ Q 2 0 a:: CL
0 0 8
0
-~
-:::1
-8 ..... :E -Cl ~
-12 en UJ CL 0 -- - ..... 0 ,, -16 en
...J , UJ
/ :::1 -20 u..
u.. 0 z:
-2~ 0 ..... CL :E :::1
-28 en z: 0
Pu2q1 ___.. (.)
-- ___.- -32 ~ ---_,.,. --12
-36 16 20 2~ 28 32 36 ~0
BURNUP (GWD /MTU)
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2
PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION OF HIGHER ISOTOPES
Figure 4.3·2 Revision 0
0 0
~------------------------------------~ 0
1-::) 0 Ul Q 0 a: 0:: w ~ a.. Ul z _J 0 _J Ul :::> .... l1... 0 a.. 1- w 0 J: _J
(0 •• <( w z 1- 0:: 0 ::) z (0
f-:::> 0 J: 1-.... ~
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ N N
(~dd) NOIJ.VCIJ.N3:JNO:J
L1J u z w a: w 11...::) 11...1-H::t 0'
~~ z 0::0 ::JO a:lOl
J-t 0 a.. w _J (0 <( z 0: ::) co I 1-..... .3=
0 0 0 0 tD .q-
0
.q.
0 0 a N
o-o=> at-o::t -ci ~ -0
Oa_ 0::) tOz
0: ::) (0
OUJ 0(!) 0<( ~a:
w > <( 0 OUJ 00:: ~0 u
0 0 0 N
0
NO~og lV:JIJ.ICi:J SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT
UNITS 1 & 2 BORON CONCENTRATION VERSUS FIRST CYCLE BURN-UP WITH AND WITHOUT
BURNABLE POISON RODS Unit 1 (Sheet 1 of 2)
Figure 4.3·3 Revision 0
2000 r------------------------------------------------
~ 1600 a. a. z 0 1-<( a: 1200 1-z w (.) z 0 (.)
z 0 800 a: 0 aJ ....I <( (.)
1-a: (.) 400
0 0
WITH BURNABLE ABSORBERS
1260 MWD/MTU DIFFERENCE
2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 CORE AVERAGE BURNUP (MWD/MTU)
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2
BORON CONCENTRATION VERSUS FIRST CYCLE BURN-UP WITH AND WITHOUT
BURNABLE POISON RODS Unit 2 {Sheet 2 of 2)
Figure 4.3-3 Revision 0
~ ~ ~ ~~ 0~ 0 181o
~ ~ ~ ~ 181 181 0 ~ 0 181 181 ~ ~ 181 0 ~ ~ 0 181 181 ~ ~ 181 ~ 0 181 0 181
181181 181181 0 1810 .. 181 181 0
2~ BP'S 12 BP'S CORE CENTER
181181 181 ~0 ~0 0 0181 181 D 181 0 D D 0 181 0 0 181 181 0 0 D ~ ~ 0 181 0 D 0 D D 0 181 0 0 Do 0 oo ~0 0 0181
9 BP'S 8 BP'S CORE CENTER t. CORE CENTER
~
0181 0 1810 ~D 0 Do I8J D D 0 I8J 0 0 181 0 0
0 0 0 0 D 181 D D
0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 D D Do D oD Do 0 oo
~ BP'S 3 BP'S
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2
BURNABLE POISON ROD ARRANGEMENT WITHIN AN ASSEMBLY
Unit 1 (Sheet 1 of 2)
Figure 4.3-4 Revision 0
~D o -o 181 181181 D ~181 D D 181 D D 181 D 181 D 181 D 181 181 D D 181 181 D D D 181 D D 181 D 181 0 181 181o D o181 181181 D 181181
8 BA"S 16 BA"S
181181 181 181181 181181 181 181181 181 D 181 D 181 181 181 181 181 181 181 181 181 181 181 181 181 181 181 D 181 D 181 181 181 181 181 181
181181 181 181181 181181 181 181181
20 SA'S 24 BA 'S
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2
BURNABLE POISON ROO ARRANGEMENT WITHIN AN ASSEMBLY
Unit 2 (Sheet 2 of 2)
Figure 4.3-4 Revision 0
WESTINGHOUSE PROPRIETARY CLASS 2
• • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • 16 IFBA ASSEM3LY 32 IFBA ASSEM3LY
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 48 IFBA ASSEM3LY 64 I FBA ASSEM3L Y
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2
TYPICAL IFBA ROD ARRANGEMENTS WITHIN AN ASSEMBLY
FIGURE 4. 3-4A REVISION 4 e L0582.041
L
19o• R p N M L K j H G F E D c B A
I I I I I I I 4 4 .4 I
9 24 IS 9 2 23 3 24 4 8 4 24 3 3
24 12 8 8 12 24 4
9 12 8 4S 8 8 12 9 -5
4 4 8 8 8 8 4 4 -6
24 8 8 12 8 8 24 --7 go• 4 8 8 12 12 8 8 4 --8 270°
24 8 8 12 8 8 24 --9
4 4 8 8 8 8 4 4 -10
9 12 8 8 4S 8 12 9 --II
24 12 8 8 12 24 12
3 24 4 8 4 24 3 13
9 24 IS 9 14 23 4 4 4 IS
o·
NUMBER INDICATES NUMBER OF BURNABLE POISON RODS 946 BP RODS S-INDICATES SOURCE ROD 12.5 W/0 ~03
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2
BURNABLE POISON LOADING PATTERN Unit 1 {Sheet 1 of 2)
Figure 4.3-5 Revision 0
180° R p N M L K J H G F E 0 c 8 A
I I I I I I I 1
64 64 64 64 64 64 64 2 64 64 3 4S
64 80 80 64 4 64 80 64 80 64 80 64 -5 64 64 80 80 64 64 -6 64 80 80 80 64 -7
90° 64 80 80 80 80 64 -8 270° 64 80 80 80 64 -9 64 64 80 80 64 64 -10 64 80 64 80 64 80 64 -11
64 80 80 64 12 64 64 13 4S
64 64 64 64 64 64 64 14
15
00
D X - NUM3ER I NO I CATES NUM3ER OF S - BURNABLE PO I SeN RCDS
4736 INTEGRAL FUEL BURNABLE ABSORBERS
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2
TYPICAL BURNABLE POISON LOADING PATTERN (SHEET 2 OF 2>
F I GURE 4. 3- 5 REVISION 4
L e L0584.041
G.H I
G F E D C B A I
G. -1- • 92 _..,.f-8
- t- q_
9
10
II
12
13
I~
15
....___........~-~ GDDDDDD "'---+--'~-~~ B EJD D D D D "'---+--'~-:9 B QEJ D D D D :::l:::t:.~:::: B EJ EJ B D D '---~ ........... ~ 2 G BG 0 EJ D .___·+---'
87 G GB G G ........... ·~-3 .... G G G CALCUUTED ~.: 1.~1
KEY: VALUE REPRESENTS ASSEMBLY RELATIVE P~ER
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2
NORMALIZED POWER DENSITY DISTRIBUTION NEAR BEGINNING OF LIFE,
UNRODDED CORE, HOT FULL POWER, NO XENON
Unit 1 (Sheet 1 of 2) Figure 4.3-6 Revision 0
I I
-t-1.068- -I
- - - 1- - r- - r - - r-
'---+--'0.~4 BOD DODD ,---t----,1 ·0~3 EJ BD D D D D '---+--'1 -~6 BBB D D D D
1 -1 ~2 BEJBBDD ~1 .:t0~=3~ 8 EJ 8 B BD L-1-.0-+~-7 ..... 1 0.9931 B B EJ B L-0-.8-'-+. ~-9-' 1 0.86911 0.850 11 0.6491
I
CALCULATED F~H= 1.359 KEY: VALUE REPRESENTS ASSEMBLY RELATIVE POWER
014'?
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2
NORMALIZED POWER DENSITY DISTRIBUTION NEAR BEGINNING OF LIFE,
UNRODDED CORE, HOT FULL POWER, NO XENON
Unit 2 (Sheet 2 of 2) Figure 4.3-6 Revision 0
~ ,H G F E 0 C B A I
G.. ~ I .00 - r- - r-t- - t- -1- f- - r- - ~
8
9 I. II
10
II
12
13
IS CALCULATED FH = I .37 LlH
KEY: VALUE REPRESENTS ASSEMBLY RELATIVE POWER
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2
NORMALIZED POWER DENSITY DISTRIBUTION NEAR BEGINNING OF LIFE,
UNRODOED CORE, HOT FULL POWER, EQUILIBRIUM XENON Unit 1 (Sheet 1 of 2)
Figure 4.3-7 Revision 0
I I
-~1.102- foo
l
- f- --- - - - - --r- -
10~0 EJDDDDDD ~1 - 1~2 EJBDDDDD ....__...._....1 ·0~3 BBBDDDD
1.1:9 BBI0·9791BDD
:::1=.o:::t~=5::::: B EJ B I 0.9921 B D ::1=.o:4~=5 ::: 8 8 B 8 B -0-.8-+~-8-B B 1 0.640 1
I
CALCULATED F~H= 1.344
KEY: VALUE REPRESENTS ASSEMBLY RELATIVE POWER
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2
NORMALIZED POWER DENSITY DISTRIBUTION NEAR BEGINNING OF LIFE,
UNRODDED CORE, HOT FULL POWER, EQUILIBRIUM XENON Unit 2 (Sheet 2 of 2)
Figure 4.3-7 Revision 0
Ci.H I
G F E 0 c B A I
<i. ~ • 82 - ~ - - - <i. 8
9
10
II
12
13
I~
IS
---.--1.~ BDDDDDD ~1.~ EJBDDDDD
I.~? BBEJDDDD =~.:2 [;Jc;J~QDD ::::'4:· :a=:[;][;] G Q G D ...._·...,__
9:
1 BGBGG '---+.8-S~GGG CALCULATED Fl" = 1.~1
I
<i. KEY: VALUE REPRESENTS ASSEMBLY RELATIVE PatiER
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2
NORMALIZED POWER DENSITY DISTRIBUTION NEAR BEGINNING OF LIFE,
GROUP D 40% INSERTED, HOT FULL POWER, EQUILIBRIUM XENON
Unit 1 (Sheet 1 of 2} Figure 4.3·8 Revision 0
I I
-t-0.975- t-
I
- - --r- -r-- - t- - - 1-
o.9~ BDDDDDD :::=+=:::
1·1:12 BBDDDDD
'-+-----11 ·0~9 BBBDDDD 1 · 1 ~2 BBBBDD
:=1.41~=2~ B 8 81 0.9381 B D ..__1.-+1~-4 ..... B 8 8 EJ EJ ..__0.-+~-1 _, EJ 1 0.86911 0.6471
I
CALCULATED Fb.H= 1.343
KEY: VALUE REPRESENTS ASSEMBLY RELATIVE POWER
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2
NORMALIZED POWER DENSITY DISTRIBUTION NEAR BEGINNING OF LIFE,
GROUP D 40% INSERTED, HOT FULL POWER, EQUILIBRIUM XENON
Unit 2 (Sheet 2 of 2) Figure 4.3-8 Revision 0
~ 8
9
10
II
12
13
I~
15
<L I H G F E D c B A I
·1- I .06 - f-f- . 1- 1- -1- 1- - ~ 1-
1.~ 8 BDDDDDD =~.~8 BBDDDDD =~·~3 BBBDDDD &......-~.~+--' [;] [;] [;] [;] D D &.....-l.+--'
1•5 BBGGEJD
....._·+---18:9 BGB GG
'---+.7-9 .... GGG CALCULATED~"= 1.30
KEY: VALUE REPRESENTS ASSEMBLY RELATIVE POWER
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2
NORMALIZED POWER DENSITY DISTRIBUTION NEAR MIDDLE OF LIFE, UNRODDED CORE, HOT FULL POWER,
EQUILIBRIUM XENON Unit 1 (Sheet 1 of 2)
Figure 4.3·9 Revision 0
I I
-"-1.187- ~
I
- ~ - - t-
I
1.216 BDDDDDD :=:t::::!1.1~0 B B D D D D D ~1.1~5 BBBDDDD L..-1 .-+1 ~-4-~ B B B B D D L..-1.-+1:_2-~ B B B I 0.9951 B D L-0-.9-+~-5.., EJ 1 0.94811 0.970 18 EJ '---0.--+7~-4_.. EJ EJ 1 0.5381
I
CALCULATED Fb.H= 1.308
KEY: VALUE REPRESENTS ASSEMBLY RELATIVE POWER
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2
NORMALIZED POWER DENSITY DISTRIBUTION NEAR MIDDLE OF LIFE, UNRODDED CORE, HOT FULL POWER,
EQUILIBRIUM XENON Unit 2 (Sheet 2 of 2)
Figure 4.3-9 Revision 0
<t_ H G F E 0 c B A I I
t 1- .99-1- ..... - ..... - 1-8
9
10
II
12
13
I~
15
I
~~.:~ GDDDDDD '---+---'·~ EJ EJ D D D D D ~~.:3 BBEJDDDD '---~·~,.___,~ B B CJ B D D '---1 .,.___,1~~ B BEJ EJ EJ D
.95 c;JGc;JGJG ..._ .... ·a_s....., G G G CALCULATED F~" = 1.2a
KEY: VA~UE REPRESENTS ASSEMBLY RELATIVE POWER
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2
NORMALIZED POWER DENSITY DISTRIBUTION NEAR END OF LIFE,
UNRODDED CORE. HOT FULL POWER, EQUILIBRIUM XENON Unit 1 (Sheet 1 of 2)
Figure 4.3-10 Revision 0
I I
-~1.090- ~ - ~ - ~ - ~ - 1- - ~ - ~ - 1-
'---+--11 · 1 ~ 1 BDDDDDD loo.--+---J1 ·0~5 EJBDDDDD
1 - 1 ~0 BBBDDDD ~14· 1 ~0:::::: B B B B D D ::::1.:41~=0:::: 8 B B B I 0.9561 D __ 0.-+9~-5 ...... B 1 0.96811 0.99518 B .... 0-.7-+~-7 .... B 1 0.72411 0.5621
I
CALCULATED F b. H= 1.239 KEY: VALUE REPRESENTS ASSEMBLY RELATIVE POWER
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2
NORMALIZED POWER DENSITY DISTRIBUTION NEAR END OF LIFE,
UNRODDED CORE, HOT FULL POWER, EQUILIBRIUM XENON Unit 2 (Sheet 2 of 2)
Figure 4.3·10 Revision 0
~ H I
G F E 0 c B A I
({_ - . 82 - - --1- - 1- -I-- - 1-
8
9
10
II
12
13
14
15
....____.__~.~ GDDDDDD
....____.__~.~ [;] [;]0 D DD D
....____.__~.;s BBBDDDD
....____.__~.~ B [;] [;] Q D D __ '·..,.__.·
19 BBGGBD __ ·..,.__.
9 L
9 B Q [;] Q G --+·~-8-G G G CALCULATED F~. = I ,3q
KEY: VALUE REPRESENTS ASSEMBLY RELATIVE POWER
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2
NORMALIZED POWER DENSITY DISTRIBUTION NEAR END OF LIFE,
HOT FULL POWER, EQUILIBRIUM XENON, GROUP D 40% INSERTED
Unit 1 (Sheet 1 of 2) Figure 4.3-11 Revision 0
I I --0.942- - - !- - - - - - f-
1 · 1 ~ 1 BDDDDDD ;::::+:::::::1 · 0~8 BBDDDDD ...____,.._._.1 · 1 ~9 8 8 B D D D D ...__
1·1
........_...3:
2 B 8 B EJ D D __ 1.-+1~-1 ..... BBBI0.9851BD ...__1._0+-4:_1 _. B 1 099311 0.99818 8 ..__o_.a+o:7___. 81 o.75o II 0.5731
I
CALCULATED F.6.H= 1.246 KEY: VALUE REPRESENTS ASSEMBLY RELATIVE POWER
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2
NORMALIZED POWER DENSITY DISTRIBUTION NEAR END OF LIFE,
HOT FULL POWER, EQUILIBRIUM XENON, GROUP D 40% INSERTED
Unit 2 (Sheet 2 of 2) Figure 4.3-11 Revision 0
~
1.02
.1 .. 02 .1.03!
1.02 1.0~ 1.08
1.02 1.06 '· 12 X 1.03 1.06 I, I'+ I, 17 1. to
1.03 1.10 ~ I. 17 I. 18 ~ 1.03 1.08 l• I~ I. I~ I. 16 I. 18 I. 17 -1.03 1.08 I. I~ I. I~ I. 16 I. 19 I. 17 I. 17
1.03 I. 10 ~ I. 16 I. 18 X I. 19 1.20 )( . 1.03 1.09 I. I~ I. I ij I. 16 I. 19 I. 17 I. 17 I. 20 I. 18
1.03 1.09 1. 15 I. 15 I. 16 I. 19 I. 17 1. 17 1.20 I. 18 I. 18
1.04 I. II X I. 18 I. 18 X I. 19 1. 19 )( I. 20 I. 20 [X 1.04 1.09 I. IS I. 18 I. 17 I. 19 1. 17 I. 17 I. 19 I. 17 I. 17 I. 20. I. 18
1.0~ 1.08 I. I~ X I. 18 I. 18 I. 16 I. 16 I. 18 '· 16 I. 16 I. 19 I, Jj [X 1.04 1.06 I. 10 I. I~ I. 16 X I. 16 I. 16 )( I. 16 I. 16 X I. 17 I. 15 I. II
1.04 1.05 1.07 1.08 I. 10 I. 12 I. 10 1. 10 I. 12 I. 10 I. II I. 12 I. I I 1.09 1.08 I. 07
1.0~ 1.0~ 1.0~ 1.0~ ~.OS 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.06 1.06 1.06 I. 06 I. 06 '· 061
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 &2
RODWISE POWER DISTRIBUTION IN A TYPICAL ASSEMBLY NEAR BEGINNING OF
LIFE, HOT FULL POWER, EQUILIBRIUM XENON, UNRODDED CORE
Figure 4.3·12 Revision 0
r---
0.98
0.98 0.99
0.98 1.00 1.03
0.99 1.02 1.07 ~ 1.00 1.03 1.09 I. II 1.09
1.01 1.06 ~ I. I I 1.11 ~ 1.00 1.0~ 1.08 1.07 1.08 I. 10 1.08
1.00 1.0~ 1.08 I. 07 1.08 I. I 0 1.08 1.'08
~ ~ ~ .
1.01 1.06 1.09 I. 10 I. 10 I. 10
1.00 I.Oq 1.08 I. 07 1.08 I. 10 I. 08 1.08 I. 10 1.08
1.00 1.0~ 1.08 1.07 I. 08 I. 10 I. 08 1.08 1.10 1.08 1.08
1.0 I 1.06 ~ I. II I. II ex: I. 10 1.10 [X 1.10 I. 10 [X 1.00 1.03 1.09 I. II 1.09 I. II 1.08 1.08 I. 10 1.08 1.08 1.11 1.09
0.99 1.02 1.07 ~ 1.11 1.11 1.07 1.07 1.09 1.07 1.07 I. II I. II ~ 0.98 1.00 1.03 1.07 1.09 ~ I. 08 1.08 [X 1.08 1.08 [X 1.09 1.07 1.03
0.98 0.99 1.00 1.02 I. 03 I. 06 1.0~ 1.oq 1.06 1.oq 1.0~ 1.06 1.03 1.02 1.00 0.98
0.98 0.98 0.98 0.99 1.00 1.0 I 1.00 1.00 I. 0 I 1.00 1.00 1.01 I. 00 0.99 0.98 0.98 0. 981
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 &2
RODWISE POWER DISTRIBUTION IN A TYPICAL ASSEMBLY NEAR END OF LIFE, HOT
FULL POWER, EQUILIBRIUM XENON, UNRODDED CORE
Figure 4.3·13 Revision 0
ex ~ 0 Q,.
2.0
I. 5
Q LLJ I . 0 N
...I < ~ 0 :z
.5
0 0 10 20 30
AO: +5.91
AO: -8.81
40 50 60 70 80 90 100 PERCENT OF ACTIVE CORE HEIGHT FROM BOTTOM
LEGEND: P = POWER FRACTION D = FRACTURAL INSERTION OF
D BANK AO = AXIAL OFFSET
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2
TYPICAL AXIAL POWER SHAPES OCCURRING AT START OF LIFE
Figure 4.3-14 Revision 0
0::
~ CL
0
2.0~----------------------------------------------~
I. 5
POWER=.5 0=.55 A0=-26.03
POWER= I .0 D=. I A0=6.92 POWER=.S
0=.21 A0=+8.20
~ I .0 ..... _j < :::E 0:: 0 z
0.5
LEGEND: D=FRACTIONAL INSERTION OF 0 BLANK
AO=AXIAL OFFSET
0~---~----~--~----~--~----~--~----~--~---~ 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
PERCENT OF ACTIVE CORE HEIGHT FROM BOTTOM
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2
TYPICAL AXIAL POWER SHAPES OCCURRING AT MIDDLE OF LIFE
Figure 4.3-15 Revision 0
--~-- ~--
01::
~ 0 a.. Q
2.0
I. 5
~ 1.0 ...J < :::E 0::: 0 z:
.5
0 0
I 0,388-1 65
AO: -25.7
100 PERCENT OF ACTIVE CORE HEIGHT FROM BOTTOM
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2
TYPICAL AXIAL POWER SHAPES OCCURRING AT END OF LIFE
Figure 4.3-16 Revision 0
"" :z ~ CD
Q u.a (.::1 0 ~ 1-a::: u.a 1-> :z ~ u.a
(,) u.a ~ a::: ~ 0 Q (,) ~
I ' I I I
' I l
0
M3MOd 3AI1113M lVIXV
Ll)
0
"" :z ~ CD
Q
5 a::: ..... Q u.a > 0 :X u.a a:::
I I
I I
I
~ ....I CD :X "'"' en en ~
a::: "'"' :. 0 Q.
:. 0 ....I
....I ~ a::: 1-u.a :c = ~ Q. - LU a::: "'"' :c Q. LU
0::: 0 (.)
0
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2
COMPARISON OF ASSEMBLY AXIAL POWER DISTRIBUTION WITH CORE AVERAGE AXIAL DISTRIBUTION D BANK SLIGHTLY INSERTED
Figure 4.3·11 Revision 0
STPEGS UFSAR
FIGURE 4.3-18
Deleted
Revision 5
STPEGS UFSAR
FIGURE 4.3-19
Deleted
Revision 5
STPEGS UFSAR
FIGURE 4.3-20
Deleted
Revision 5
~ ex UJ
~ Q.. . -I UJ 0::
X
N
o-1.4.. ~
:::E ~ >< ~
2.6
2.1J
2.2
2.0
I .8
I .6
I ,IJ
1.2
1.0 0 BOTTOM
2
2.50 • 01
2.50 . 71
2.3~ • 13 I
I .70 • I~ I
6 8 10 CORE HEIGHT (FT)
12 IIJ TOP
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2
MAXIMUM FQ X RELATIVE POWER VERSUS AXIAL HEIGHT DURING NORMAL
OPERATION
Figure 4.3-21 Revision 0
20
15
1-u.. -~ -0::: LU ~ a.. 10 0::: < LU z: ....J
::..:: < LU a..
5
0 -50 -IW
0 -~ '!i, 0
oa 0 0 0 00 8o0 ll 0 , 0 ° 0 0 0 ool
~ 'lt0o ~o 0
o \f 8 8 oo 0 0 & 00 0 0 0., 0 9 0:
0
l ·V.1t"·~.!. . 0 0
\ :,;o 0 \o rP o oc:,1, 0 ~ 0 0 ,pOo 0 oq,O:,/ 0 8 GO OOdJOO OQ)OO 8
0 r o0, o8o 0°~~ol t 0 0 o~ 0 8o
0 8o o oD ~o 9 o 0 oO'l)o Joo ao t9 0
o\ oo 9 0
?o'rP 0 0 oo q, Ooo
0
-30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 FLUX DIFFERENCE (6I)
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2
PEAK LINEAR POWER DURING CONTROL ROD MALFUNCTION OVERPOWER
TRANSIENTS Unit 1 (Sheet 1 of 2)
Figure 4.3·22 Revision 0
f ~ ~ -a: w 3:
20
15
~ 10 a: ~ z :::; ~ < w a..
5
0 -40 -30
..
-20 -10 0 10 20 30 FLUX Dl FFERENCE ( t::.l )
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2
PEAK LINEAR POWER DURING CONTROL ROD MALFUNCTION OVERPOWER
TRANSIENTS Unit 2 (Sheet 2 of 2)
Figure 4.3-22 Revision 0
20
0 0
15 1--00 0
' -I-u.. -~ -0:::: LIJ
~ 10 Q.. ~
0:::: <( LIJ z -_.J
::.0:: <( LIJ Q..
5 t--
0 I -50 -4-0
l -30
I I I I -20 -10 0 10 20 30
FLUX DIFFERENCE (6I)
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2
PEAK LINEAR POWER DURING BORATION/OILUTION OVERPOWER
TRANSIENTS Unit 1 (Sheet 1 of 2)
Figure 4.3-23 Revision 0
-~ LL ......... ~ ~ -a: w ~ 0 0.. a: < w z -1 ::r:::: < w 0..
20 -----------------------------------------------,
15
10
5
0 -50
•
-40 -30
6 At,.a•6
116.6 6 ,r'
-20 10 0 10 20 30 FLUX DIFFERENCE (b. I)
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2
PEAK LINEAR POWER DURING BORATION/DILUTION OVERPOWER
TRANSIENTS Unit 2 (Sheet 2 of 2)
Figure 4.3-23 Revision 0
R p N M L K J H G F E D c B A
1
2 0.759 o. 792 ~.3"
3 I. 2 17 I I. 22~ o. 6. -0.77~ I 4 I. 255 I
0.800 1.2~9 3.14 .. -o.5~ -- r----- - --- ···---
5 I. 229 I. 229 1.225 I. 218 -0.3"' -0.9.
6 I. 109 I. 077 l. 107 1.092 -0. 2"' I.~ t
7 1.202 I. 223 I. 170 1.256 -2. 7·- 2. 7 ~
8 0.523 I. 217 I. 221 I. 217 o. sqs 1.203 I. 233 I. 210
q.6'' I. 1·~. 1.0. -0.6 9
10
11 1.229 I. 229 I. 189 l. 220 -3. 3·rl -0.7 1
12
13 I. 217 ...--- CALCULATED I. 211 ,.___ MEASURED -o.s· ~DIFFERENCE
14
15
- PEAKING FACTORS Fz : I. 5
~H : I. 357 SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT F" : 2.07 LOCATED AT UNITS 1 &2
Q M-8 SOUTH COMPARISON BETWEEN CALCULATED AND
MEASURED RELATIVE FUEL ASSEMBLY POWER DISTRIBUTION
Figure 4.3-24 Revision 0
"' z: "' C) A. - ::1 .... .... .... .... - % "' e-a.:: z: e...,.o C) :.:.-u %~N .... ~ .... a.:: .n ...... -c C) Q) to')
u .naoc:~
N . . N C)
I I
II II - -"' u -c _, .... -c % u - -C) C) . 4 4
., ,... -II II
"' u ... _, .... -c % u -N N .... ....
N 0 . LEGEND:
M = MEASURED VALUE E = EXPECTED VALUE OR
CALCULATED VALUE AO = AXIAl. OFFSET
~ ,... II
~, ....
ao ID . . H~Ocl 3AilV13H
0 c.o
~
0 N
-"' Q
a.:: ef Q 0 ..., 0 N
• .... -ef . Q % z C) :z:: -ci
,_ 0 ::c .... Q <.::1 .... .... ao
u a.:: I.U ::1 ::c Q "' .... 4 I.U a: .... A. % ~
0
I <,)
0 0 ID
0 ::r N . .
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2
COMPARISON OF CALCULATED AND MEASURED AXIAL SHAPE
Figure 4.3-25 Revision 0
x REACTOR I 0 REACTOR L+ \l REACTOR 2 • REACTOR 5
0 e REACTOR 3 FQ
0
0 3.0
• 0
• • "V 2.5
"V \7)( o• • X 0 "V
0 • • X \7 X X • •o• • X ~X X • i'. \ X X ~ ~ 0 X
0 • 0 0 "V@_O. • 0 ~
oo • •• 8 ~Jtf
• ~;s 0 Olo
0 co. Q ~ •• 0~ X
1.5
-50 -~5 -ij() -35 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
INCORE AXIAL OFFSET (~)
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2
MEASURED VALUES OF FQ FOR FULL POWER ROD CONFIGURATIONS
Figure 4.3-26 Revision 0
LL. 0 -:&: (,) Cl..
L.L. L.L. .....
1-~ -Q.. ~
I-z: I.I.J (,)
LL. 1.1.. I.I.J 0 (,)
I.I.J 01: ~ I-C( 01: I.I.J Cl.. :&: I.I.J I-01: I.I.J . ...J Cl.. Cl.. 0 0
-1.2
-I.~
-1.6
-1 .8
-2.0
-2.2
-2.~
-2.6 500 600 700 800 900 I 000 1100 1200
EFFECTIVE FUEL TEMPERATURE TEFF (°F}
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2
DOPPLER TEMPERATURE COEFFICIENT AT BOLAND EOL CYCLE 1 Unit 1 (Sheet 1 of 2)
Figure 4.3-27 Revision 0
-1.2
G:' -1.4 0 ......... ~ 0 a.. -1-z w 0 u. u. w 0 0 w a: ::J
-1.6
-1.8
~ -2.0 a: w a. ~ ..... -... w .. ,_ 1- -2.2 a: w ...I a. a. 0 Q -2.4
-2.6 ___ _... ___ ~--..1...----.1----'-----'-----' 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200
EFFECTIVE FUEL TEMPERATURE (°F)
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2
DOPPLER TEMPERATURE COEFFICIENT AT BOLAND EOL CYCLE 1
Unit 2 (Sheet 2 of 2)
Figure 4.3·27 Revision 0
-6
-8
-10
-12
-I~
-16 0 20 ~0 60 80 100
POWER (PERCENT OF FULL POWER)
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2
DOPPLER ONLY POWER COEFFICIENT· BOL, EOL CYCLE 1
Unit 1 (Sneet 1 of 2)
Figure 4.3·28 Revision 0
-a: w ~ 0 CL ~ !Sl ~ (.)
-8
e:. -10 1-z w (.) u:: LL. w 0 (.) a: w ~ 0 CL -12 > -' z 0 a: w -' CL CL 0 c
-14 0 20 40 60 80 100
POWER LEVEL (PERCENT OF FULL POWER)
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2
DOPPLER ONLY POWER COEFFICIENT· BOL. EOL CYCLE 1
Unit 2 (Sheet 2 of 2)
Figure 4.3-28 Revision 0
-% (..) 0.. -
Q.. ~ .....
(..) UJ u... UJ Q
ex: UJ
~ 0..
~ _. :z: 0 ex: UJ _. 0.. 0.. 0 0
0
-500
-1000
-1500 0 20 ~0 60 80 100
POWER LEVEL (PERCENT OF FULL POWER)
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2
DOPPLER ONLY POWER DEFECT· SOL, EOL CYCLE 1
Unit 1 (Sheet 1 of 2)
Figure 4.3-29 Revision 0
0
-200
-~ (.) a.. 1-(.) -400 w LL. w 0 a: w :: -600 0 a.. > ...J z 0 a: -800 w ...J a.. a.. 0 0
-1000
-1200 0 ~ ~ 00 00 100
POWER LEVEL (PERCENT OF FULL POWER)
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2
DOPPLER ONLY POWER DEFECT· BOL. EOL CYCLE 1
Unit 2 (Sheet 2 of 2)
Figure 4.3·29 Revision 0
20
.. 10 0 -:E (..) Q.,
:::E 1-~ - 0 ()... ~
1-z: LIJ
(..) .. .. -10 LIJ 0 (..)
LIJ 0:: ;::) 1-C[ 0:: LIJ Q.,
~ -20 1-0:: 0 1-C[ Cl: LIJ c 0 :E -30
-IW 0 100 200 300 IWO 500 600
MODERATOR TEMPERATURE (°F)
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2
MOD ERA TOR TEMPERATURE COEFFICIENT- BOL. CYCLE 1 NO RODS
Unit 1 (Sheet 1 of 2)
Figure 4.3-30 Revision 0
-u.. 0 ........
20
~ 10 a.. 1-z w 0 u.. u.. w 0 0 0 w a: ::::> 1-<( a: ~ -10 ::! w 1-a: 0 1-<( a: w -20 0 0 ::!
~~===========================::~2000PPM
1000 PPM
500 PPM
0 PPM
-30 ~------._ ______ ._ ______ ~------~--------------_. 0 100 200 300 400 500 600
MODERATOR TEMPERATURE (°F)
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2
MOD ERA TOR TEMPERATURE COEFFICIENT· BOL, CYCLE 1 NO RODS
Unit 2 (Sheet 2 of 2)
Figure 4.3-30 Revision 0
u.. 0 -::::E: (.) a.. -::::E 1-'C) -Cl. ta
1-:z LLJ (.)
u.. u.. LLJ 0 (.)
LLJ Clt:!
~ Clt:! LLJ a.. ~ 1-Clt:! 0 1-ct Clt:! LLJ Q
~
10 ~--------------------------------------------------~
0
-10
-20
-30
-ItO
-50 0 100
UNRODDED
200 300 ltOO 500 600 MODERATOR TEMPERATURE (°F)
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2
MOD ERA TOR TEMPERATURE COEFFICIENT· EOL, CYCLE 1
Unit 1 (Sheet 1 of 2)
Figure 4.3-31 Revision 0
10
-u.. 0 0 ........ ~ () a.. 1-z -10 w () u.. u.. w 0 -20 () w 0: ::> 1-<t: 0: -30 w a.. ~ w 1-0: 0 1-
-40 <t: 0: w 0 0 ~ -50
-60 0 100
UNRODDED
500 PPM
0 PPM
0 PPM
200 300 400 500 600
MODERATOR TEMPERATURE (°F)
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2
MODERATOR TEMPERATURE COEFFICIENT· EOL, CYCLE 1
Unit 2 (Sheet 2 of 2)
Figure 4.3-31 Revision 0
u.. 0 -% (.) Q..
% I-
~ <l.. ~
1-:z LIJ
(.)
u.. u.. LIJ 0 (.)
LIJ 0::: ::::1 1-< 0::: LIJ Q..
Cfj 1-0::: 0 I-< 0::: LIJ 0 0 %
15
10
5
68°F 0
/ /
/~/ -5
/ .
/ / -10 /
/ /
/ /
-15 , /
-20
-25 ~----------------~~----------------~--------------------~--------------------~ 0 500 1000 1500 2000
SOLUBLE BORON CONCENTRATION (PPM)
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2
MODERATOR TEMPERATURE COEFFICIENT AS A FUNCTION OF BORON
CONCENTRATION- BOL, CYCLE 1, NO RODS Unit 1 (Sheet 1 of 2)
Figure 4.3-32 Revision 0
10 tL ~ ~
~ 5 -1-z w (..) 0 u:: u. w 8 -5 w a: ::> ~ -10 a: w (l.
~ ~ -15 a: 0 1-~ -20 w 0 0 ~ -25
-30 ~----------~------------~----------_.----------~ 0 500 1 000 1500 2000
SOLUBLE BORON CONCENTRATION (PPM)
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2
MODERATOR TEMPERATURE COEFFICIENT AS A FUNCTION OF BORON
CONCENTRATION • BOL, CYCLE 1, NO RODS Unit 2 {Sheet 2 of 2)
Figure 4.3-32 Revision 0
-u.. 0 -::E u Q.. -.= f't) -Q. f't)
.... z: LI.J
u u.. u.. LI.J 0 u LI.J a:: ::::;, 1-c:[ a:: LI.J Q.. ::E LI.J 1-a:: 0 .... c:[ a:: LI.J 0 0 ::E
0
-5
-10
-15
-20
-25
-30
-35 0 5000 10.000 15,000
BURNUP (MWD/MTU)
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2
HOT FULL POWER MODERATOR TEMPERATURE COEFFICIENT DURING
CYCLE 1 FOR THE CRITICAL BORON CONCENTRATION
Unit 1 (Sheet 1 of 2) Figure 4.3·33 Revision 0
-LL 0 ......... ~ (.) a.. -1-z w (.) LL LL w 0 (.) w a: => 1-<( a: w a.. ~ w 1-a: 0 1-< a: w Cl 0 ~
-4
-8
-12
-16
-20
-24
-28
-32
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 1 0000 12000 14000 16000 BURNUP (MWD/MTU)
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2
HOT FULL POWER MODERATOR TEMPERATURE COEFFICIENT DURING
CYCLE 1 FOR THE CRITICAL BORON CONCENTRATION
Unit 2 (Sheet 2 of 2) Figure 4.3-33 Revision 0
·'
-8
-a:: LIJ
! -10 1--0..
I-:z LIJ (,.,) a:: LIJ 0.. - -12 ::::E r--(,.,) 0.. -0..
~ - SOL Q.. ~ -I~ 1--
I- ~ :z LIJ -(,.,) -u.. -16 t--u.. LIJ 0 (,.,)
a:: LIJ
! EOL 0.. -18 r--...J < ,........ 6 I-
-20 I I I I 0 20 ~0 60
\ 80 100
POWER LEVEL {PERCENT OF FULL POWER)
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2
TOTAL POWER COEFFICIENT BOL, EOL CYCLE 1
Unit 1 (Sheet 1 of 2)
Figure 4.3·34 Revision 0
-12
-a: w ~ 0 -14 a.. -:R. ~ ~ (.) a.. 1-z w (3 -16 u:: u. w 0 (.) a: w ~ 0 a.. -1 -18 <t 1-0 1-
-20 0
---------------------..... EOL ........... .......... .......... .......... .......... ..........
20 40 60 80 100
POWER LEVEL (PERCENT OF FULL POWER)
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2
TOTAL POWER COEFFICIENT BOL, EOL CYCLE 1
Unit 2 {Sheet 2 of 2)
Figure 4.3-34 Revision 0
0
-500
-3 ~
Q.. .. 1-(,) LIJ ~ LIJ -1000 Q
0:: LIJ
~ ~
-1 < b 1-
-1500
-2000 0 20 4-0 60 80 100
POWER LEVEL {PERCENT OF FULL POWER)
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2
TOTAL POWER DEFECT BOL, EOL CYCLE 1 Unit 1 (Sheet 1 of 2)
Figure 4.3-35 Revision 0
0 ~--------------------------------------------~
-~ (,) a.. -..... (,) w u. w c
-500
a: -1000 w 3: 0 a.. ..J < ..... 0 .....
-1500
20 40 60 80 100
POWER LEVEL (PERCENT OF FULL POWER}
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2
TOTAL POWER DEFECT BOL, EOL CYCLE 1 Unit 2 {Sheet 2 of 2)
Figure 4.3-35 Revision 0
Revision 18
* The Unit 1 Cycle 20 core contains 56 RCCAs with no RCCA installed at core location D-6. Unit 1 has seven (7) rods for shutdown bank SA. The total number of rods for Unit 1 is twenty-seven (27) for the shutdown banks.
*
*
*
90
80
-70 :c (.) :z: - 60 ~ a..
:c 1- 50 o:::· 0 3: 0 0 0::: qo ...J ~ -1-:z: UJ 30 0::: UJ u... u... 0 20
10
0 180
INCHES WITHDRAWN
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2
ACCIDENTAL SIMULTANEOUS WITHDRAWAL OF TWO CONTROL BANKS MOVING IN THE SAME PLANT (TYPICAL)
Figure 4.3-37 Revision 0
N
0 - -I I
>< .... Q z:-
I - ::r >cn:r-,_ a:: 0 0 -::::. .. -' 0 0 0 a; :C I I .. -,_ "'
{1N3J~3d) 13S~~O 1VIXV
0 0
7 ~----------------------------~ SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT
UNITS 1 & 2
AXIAL OFFSET VERSUS TIME PWR CORE WITH A 12-FT HEIGHT AND 121 ASSEMBLIES
Figure 4.3-40 Revision 0
10
~ 8 -:I' 1- 6 z: ....: a::
~ 0 ....: ~
I 2 N
1- 0 z: ....: a:: 0 ....: :::) - 2 Qo -UJ - ~ (.,) z: UJ a:: UJ
- 6 u.. u.. Q
1- - 8 -J
1-1- -10 z: ....: a:: 0 -12 ....: ~
-I~
-16 0
~ . '. . \ . \ STABILITY INDEX: -0.076 (HR. -I) • •• . ~ \ ;rc ... •
• • ' ,.. . ................. ... ~:~
RCC E-11
N~3 N~ I
~ 8 12 16 20 2~ 28 3 2 36 40 ~~ ~ 52 56 60 6 ~
HOURS AFTER WiTHDRAWAL OF RCC E-1 I
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2
XV XENON TEST THERMOCOUPLE RESPONSE QUADRANT TILT DIFFERENCE
VERSUS TIME
Figure 4.3·41 Revision 0
(wjd) 1~3~30 H31dd00 1Y~~31NI 0 0 0 0 8 8 8 8 0 0 8 0 8.8 ~ N 00 c.o ~ N N N N - - - - - 00 c.o I I I I I I I I I I
z 0 -1-
"" .,., z ... z a.. 0 :E: -0 ..... <..> "" .,., "" :z: ~ ..... z a.. -0 a::a :E: :z: -0 ..... --' <..> :E: "" 0 - -' 0:: :z: ex ::1 1- 0 ..... u :z: 0:: a.. -' 0 0 ~ "" u a::a ..... w
0 <J
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c.o l.l') ~ ('I) N
I I I I I
( d %/Wjd) 1N31 ~I ~~30~ .~31dd00
8 8 ~ N 0
I I
8 I I I 0
a>
I I I 0
I 00
I I I o 0 .......
0 0 -I
0 a:: L.&J c.o ~ a.. ..J ..J =>
0 .... l.l') .....
0 1-z L.&J (,)
0 a:: ~ ~ a..
0 ('I)
0 N
0
0
0
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2
CALCULATED AND MEASURED DOPPLER DEFECT AND COEFFICIENTS AT BOL 'TWO-LOOP PLANT, 121 ASSEMBLIES, 12-FOOT
CORE
Figure 4.3-42 Revision 0
1~00 r-------------------------------------------------~
1200
1000
800 [ a.
CD (,) 600
~00
200
CALCULATED
0 ~--------_.----~----~----------~--~----_.~--~ 0 2000 ~000 6000 8000 I 0000 I 2000 I ~000 16000 I 8000
BURHUP.(MWO/MTU)
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2
COMPARISON OF CALCULATED AND MEASURED BORON CONCENTRATION FOR 2·LOOP PLANT, 121 ASSEMBLIES, 12-FOOT
CORE
Figure 4.3-43 Revision 0
0 0 N I'--
8 <.0
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2
COMPARISON OF CALCULATED AND MEASURED CaiN 2-LOOP PLANT 121
ASSEMBLIES, 12-FOOT CORE
Figure 4.3-44 Revision 0
8
8 0 =r
8 0 C"")
0 0 0 N -0 0 0
8 8 § CJ)
§S" ~~
0
Q §~ .... ... .......~ c ....J ;:) ::I oz c..> 8~ ....J c \QeD c..>
§ Ll'l
0 0 0 ::t'
0 8 ('I)
8 0 N
§
0
8 8 8 8 0 ~ ('I) N
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2
COMPARISON OF CALCULATED AND MEASURED C8 IN 3·LOOP PLANT, 157
ASSEMBLIES, 12·FOOT CORE
Figure 4.3·45 Revision 0