soil responses to ctf at fb parrish & sonscontrolledtrafficfarming.com/downloads/parrish ctf...

48
Soil responses to CTF at FB Parrish & Sons - a project in progress!

Upload: others

Post on 27-Sep-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Soil responses to CTF at FB Parrish & Sonscontrolledtrafficfarming.com/downloads/parrish ctf soil responses.pdf · •CTF confines all tracks to least possible area of permanent traffic

Soil responses to CTF at FB Parrish & Sons

- a project in progress!

Page 2: Soil responses to CTF at FB Parrish & Sonscontrolledtrafficfarming.com/downloads/parrish ctf soil responses.pdf · •CTF confines all tracks to least possible area of permanent traffic

• CTF confines all tracks to least possible area of permanent traffic lanes

What is CTF?

– CTF is a traffic management system

– it’s not prescriptive about tillage

Page 3: Soil responses to CTF at FB Parrish & Sonscontrolledtrafficfarming.com/downloads/parrish ctf soil responses.pdf · •CTF confines all tracks to least possible area of permanent traffic

Crop responses to CTF

0

5

10

15

20

25

% y

ield

loss

cf

wit

h C

TF

Crops

% loss in yield compared with controlled traffic by crop type

Barley

Oats

Peas

Potatoes

Sugar beet

Wheat

Onions

Page 4: Soil responses to CTF at FB Parrish & Sonscontrolledtrafficfarming.com/downloads/parrish ctf soil responses.pdf · •CTF confines all tracks to least possible area of permanent traffic

Arndt and Rose, 1966

• “Excessive traffic necessitates excessive tillage”

Page 5: Soil responses to CTF at FB Parrish & Sonscontrolledtrafficfarming.com/downloads/parrish ctf soil responses.pdf · •CTF confines all tracks to least possible area of permanent traffic

The more you run on it!

Page 6: Soil responses to CTF at FB Parrish & Sonscontrolledtrafficfarming.com/downloads/parrish ctf soil responses.pdf · •CTF confines all tracks to least possible area of permanent traffic

the more fuel and time you waste!

Page 7: Soil responses to CTF at FB Parrish & Sonscontrolledtrafficfarming.com/downloads/parrish ctf soil responses.pdf · •CTF confines all tracks to least possible area of permanent traffic

Conventional vs CTFTasmania, 2009

Conventional traffic

Page 8: Soil responses to CTF at FB Parrish & Sonscontrolledtrafficfarming.com/downloads/parrish ctf soil responses.pdf · •CTF confines all tracks to least possible area of permanent traffic

Conventional vs CTFTasmania, 2009

CTF

Page 9: Soil responses to CTF at FB Parrish & Sonscontrolledtrafficfarming.com/downloads/parrish ctf soil responses.pdf · •CTF confines all tracks to least possible area of permanent traffic

This is what CTF is trying to avoid!

Page 10: Soil responses to CTF at FB Parrish & Sonscontrolledtrafficfarming.com/downloads/parrish ctf soil responses.pdf · •CTF confines all tracks to least possible area of permanent traffic

This bit looks good on top – but!

Compact layerZone of wetness above compact

layer

Page 11: Soil responses to CTF at FB Parrish & Sonscontrolledtrafficfarming.com/downloads/parrish ctf soil responses.pdf · •CTF confines all tracks to least possible area of permanent traffic

Constituents of a soil

With acknowledgement to R.C. Palmer, Independent Soil Assessment [email protected]

Page 12: Soil responses to CTF at FB Parrish & Sonscontrolledtrafficfarming.com/downloads/parrish ctf soil responses.pdf · •CTF confines all tracks to least possible area of permanent traffic

Practical demonstrations

Page 13: Soil responses to CTF at FB Parrish & Sonscontrolledtrafficfarming.com/downloads/parrish ctf soil responses.pdf · •CTF confines all tracks to least possible area of permanent traffic

Extracting undisturbed sample at trafficked site

Page 14: Soil responses to CTF at FB Parrish & Sonscontrolledtrafficfarming.com/downloads/parrish ctf soil responses.pdf · •CTF confines all tracks to least possible area of permanent traffic

Extracting undisturbed sample at site in CTF since 2009

Page 15: Soil responses to CTF at FB Parrish & Sonscontrolledtrafficfarming.com/downloads/parrish ctf soil responses.pdf · •CTF confines all tracks to least possible area of permanent traffic

CTF RTF

2.1 g/ccwet BD

2.3 g/ccwet BD

Page 16: Soil responses to CTF at FB Parrish & Sonscontrolledtrafficfarming.com/downloads/parrish ctf soil responses.pdf · •CTF confines all tracks to least possible area of permanent traffic

CTF RTF

Infiltration and drainage test

1 litre of water added to CTF, no ponding, most

drained in 150 s

1 litre of water added to RTF, 30 mm ponding, most water

away from surface in 300 s

Page 17: Soil responses to CTF at FB Parrish & Sonscontrolledtrafficfarming.com/downloads/parrish ctf soil responses.pdf · •CTF confines all tracks to least possible area of permanent traffic

Danish workP. Schjønning et al, Aarhus University

Trafficked plots – pores > 0.3 mm

Page 18: Soil responses to CTF at FB Parrish & Sonscontrolledtrafficfarming.com/downloads/parrish ctf soil responses.pdf · •CTF confines all tracks to least possible area of permanent traffic

Danish workP. Schjønning et al, Aarhus University

Non-trafficked plots – pores > 0.3 mm

Page 19: Soil responses to CTF at FB Parrish & Sonscontrolledtrafficfarming.com/downloads/parrish ctf soil responses.pdf · •CTF confines all tracks to least possible area of permanent traffic

SOIL COMPACTION STUDY

Research funded by:

The Morley Foundation

Douglas Bomford Trust

The Chadacre Trust

Page 20: Soil responses to CTF at FB Parrish & Sonscontrolledtrafficfarming.com/downloads/parrish ctf soil responses.pdf · •CTF confines all tracks to least possible area of permanent traffic

Existing systems –impossible to avoid damage

Page 21: Soil responses to CTF at FB Parrish & Sonscontrolledtrafficfarming.com/downloads/parrish ctf soil responses.pdf · •CTF confines all tracks to least possible area of permanent traffic

Soil repair - subsoiling

Page 22: Soil responses to CTF at FB Parrish & Sonscontrolledtrafficfarming.com/downloads/parrish ctf soil responses.pdf · •CTF confines all tracks to least possible area of permanent traffic

Benefits of subsoiling can be short-lived! Sandy loam

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

0.000 0.500 1.000 1.500 2.000 2.500 3.000 3.500

De

pth

, cm

Penetration resistance, MPa

"As found"

1, CTF

11, WDT

2, WCT

4, TCT

3, WCT +WDT

10, TCT +WDT

Page 23: Soil responses to CTF at FB Parrish & Sonscontrolledtrafficfarming.com/downloads/parrish ctf soil responses.pdf · •CTF confines all tracks to least possible area of permanent traffic

Clay soileven tracking in dry conditions can have a big effect!

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5

De

pth

, cm

Penetration resistance, MPa

1, CTF - 5 yrs

5, TCT

4, TCT+TCT

6, WComb

2, WComb+WCT

9, WT&T

Page 24: Soil responses to CTF at FB Parrish & Sonscontrolledtrafficfarming.com/downloads/parrish ctf soil responses.pdf · •CTF confines all tracks to least possible area of permanent traffic

SubsoilingBenefits on heavy soils – but!

Large cavities can reduce root access to water

Page 25: Soil responses to CTF at FB Parrish & Sonscontrolledtrafficfarming.com/downloads/parrish ctf soil responses.pdf · •CTF confines all tracks to least possible area of permanent traffic

Winter wheat yields (continuous)

Sandy loam soil, 2010

Page 26: Soil responses to CTF at FB Parrish & Sonscontrolledtrafficfarming.com/downloads/parrish ctf soil responses.pdf · •CTF confines all tracks to least possible area of permanent traffic

Winter wheat yieldsClay soil, 2010

1, C

TF

2, W

com

b+W

CT

3, W

com

b+W

CT+

WD

T

4, T

CT+

TCT

5, T

CT

6, W

com

b

7, T

CT+

sub

8, W

com

b+s

ub

9, W

T&T

11

, WD

T

5.0

5.5

6.0

6.5

7.0

7.5

8.0

8.5

Equ

ival

en

t fi

eld

yie

ld, t

ha

-1

Page 27: Soil responses to CTF at FB Parrish & Sonscontrolledtrafficfarming.com/downloads/parrish ctf soil responses.pdf · •CTF confines all tracks to least possible area of permanent traffic

RecommendationsSubsoiling

• Fissure rather than massively disrupt

– closer spaced less aggressive tines

• but make sure not below critical depth

• Adopt CTF after subsoiling

– ensure subsequent tillage operations fill wheel tracks

• Deal with grain harvester as and when necessary

Page 28: Soil responses to CTF at FB Parrish & Sonscontrolledtrafficfarming.com/downloads/parrish ctf soil responses.pdf · •CTF confines all tracks to least possible area of permanent traffic

Cereals harvester

Trailer

Grain auger

Cereals harvester

Cultivator/drill

Chemical application

Onions and potatoes- some ideas, TwinTrac

Sown tracks Tramlines

Harvester Tractor

Max 6 m wide implements

Implement width = Track 1 + Track 2

Page 29: Soil responses to CTF at FB Parrish & Sonscontrolledtrafficfarming.com/downloads/parrish ctf soil responses.pdf · •CTF confines all tracks to least possible area of permanent traffic

Practitioners TwinTrac system

1.93 m3.86 m

Tractor etc.Harvester

5.79 m TwinTrac CTF system

Trailer

Cereals harvster 5.79 m

Grain auger Cultivator/drill 5.79 m

28.95 m chemical application

Sown tracks

Tramlines

76% of area not tracked

Page 30: Soil responses to CTF at FB Parrish & Sonscontrolledtrafficfarming.com/downloads/parrish ctf soil responses.pdf · •CTF confines all tracks to least possible area of permanent traffic

Andrew Manfield, UK200 ha Hessleskew

• CTF a way of thinking

• A lot of learning

– machine widths not true!

• 50% less fuel with CTF & No-till

– 5 tractors down to 3.5

– No no-till without CTF

• still some cults

• ploughing 2 gears up on CTF

• Potatoes being integrated

Page 31: Soil responses to CTF at FB Parrish & Sonscontrolledtrafficfarming.com/downloads/parrish ctf soil responses.pdf · •CTF confines all tracks to least possible area of permanent traffic

Another TwinTrac option

5.18 m Claas 550 combine used at 4.8 m

4.8 m SimTech T-SEM universal drill

24 m SP chemical applicator

Data Tracked Uncropped

Percentage 26% 5%

1.8 m + 3.0 m track widths = 4.8 m implements

Page 32: Soil responses to CTF at FB Parrish & Sonscontrolledtrafficfarming.com/downloads/parrish ctf soil responses.pdf · •CTF confines all tracks to least possible area of permanent traffic

The challenge – getting from this

Page 33: Soil responses to CTF at FB Parrish & Sonscontrolledtrafficfarming.com/downloads/parrish ctf soil responses.pdf · •CTF confines all tracks to least possible area of permanent traffic

to this or better

Page 34: Soil responses to CTF at FB Parrish & Sonscontrolledtrafficfarming.com/downloads/parrish ctf soil responses.pdf · •CTF confines all tracks to least possible area of permanent traffic

Your thoughts and ideas

16:00 – after next session and refreshments

Page 35: Soil responses to CTF at FB Parrish & Sonscontrolledtrafficfarming.com/downloads/parrish ctf soil responses.pdf · •CTF confines all tracks to least possible area of permanent traffic
Page 36: Soil responses to CTF at FB Parrish & Sonscontrolledtrafficfarming.com/downloads/parrish ctf soil responses.pdf · •CTF confines all tracks to least possible area of permanent traffic

Farming the future withmachines from the past!

Tim Chamen

CTF Europe Ltd

Page 37: Soil responses to CTF at FB Parrish & Sonscontrolledtrafficfarming.com/downloads/parrish ctf soil responses.pdf · •CTF confines all tracks to least possible area of permanent traffic

1855 “Guideway agriculture”

• Alexander Halkett:

– “the implements and their operation are always kept at a regulated height”

– “it enables ploughing, cultivating, sowing, hoeing, watering and reaping all capable of being performed”

– “as the seeds are sown with mechanical precision in lines, hoeing, trimming or watering can be carried out in between”

Page 38: Soil responses to CTF at FB Parrish & Sonscontrolledtrafficfarming.com/downloads/parrish ctf soil responses.pdf · •CTF confines all tracks to least possible area of permanent traffic

“Guideway agriculture”

Page 39: Soil responses to CTF at FB Parrish & Sonscontrolledtrafficfarming.com/downloads/parrish ctf soil responses.pdf · •CTF confines all tracks to least possible area of permanent traffic

Cotton Research Station, CAResearch gantries: USDA

Page 40: Soil responses to CTF at FB Parrish & Sonscontrolledtrafficfarming.com/downloads/parrish ctf soil responses.pdf · •CTF confines all tracks to least possible area of permanent traffic

12 m cultivation with 100 hpResearch gantries: SRI

Page 41: Soil responses to CTF at FB Parrish & Sonscontrolledtrafficfarming.com/downloads/parrish ctf soil responses.pdf · •CTF confines all tracks to least possible area of permanent traffic

Offset loadsResearch gantries: SRI

Page 42: Soil responses to CTF at FB Parrish & Sonscontrolledtrafficfarming.com/downloads/parrish ctf soil responses.pdf · •CTF confines all tracks to least possible area of permanent traffic

Mounted lightweight rollsResearch gantries: SRI

Page 43: Soil responses to CTF at FB Parrish & Sonscontrolledtrafficfarming.com/downloads/parrish ctf soil responses.pdf · •CTF confines all tracks to least possible area of permanent traffic

Twin ploughs with LH and RH bodiesResearch gantries: SRI

Page 44: Soil responses to CTF at FB Parrish & Sonscontrolledtrafficfarming.com/downloads/parrish ctf soil responses.pdf · •CTF confines all tracks to least possible area of permanent traffic

4 m harvesterResearch gantries: SRI

Page 45: Soil responses to CTF at FB Parrish & Sonscontrolledtrafficfarming.com/downloads/parrish ctf soil responses.pdf · •CTF confines all tracks to least possible area of permanent traffic

Dowler production m/c

Page 46: Soil responses to CTF at FB Parrish & Sonscontrolledtrafficfarming.com/downloads/parrish ctf soil responses.pdf · •CTF confines all tracks to least possible area of permanent traffic

Less than 10% tracked area

Page 47: Soil responses to CTF at FB Parrish & Sonscontrolledtrafficfarming.com/downloads/parrish ctf soil responses.pdf · •CTF confines all tracks to least possible area of permanent traffic

Dowler – next generation

Page 48: Soil responses to CTF at FB Parrish & Sonscontrolledtrafficfarming.com/downloads/parrish ctf soil responses.pdf · •CTF confines all tracks to least possible area of permanent traffic

New moves are afoot!

• Many advantages compared with tractor systems

• Enhanced flexibility of operations and cropping

• Don’t dismiss out of hand

– they can be engineered to deliver!

• Register your interest on the “Wide Span” page at www.ctfeurope.eu