social contract theories

13
1 Social Contract Theories Social Contract Theories Soazig Le Bihan - University of Montana

Upload: noelle

Post on 21-Feb-2016

58 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Social Contract Theories. Introduction. Reminder on Kant: What is morality?. Social Contract Theories: Foundation of morality Legitimacy of government in the modern Western world. Hobbes, Kant and Rawls. Hobbes: Morality based on self-interest! . Outline. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Social Contract Theories

1

Social Contract TheoriesSocial Contract Theories

Soazig Le Bihan - University of Montana

Page 2: Social Contract Theories

2

IntroductionIntroduction

Reminder on Kant: What is morality?

Social Contract Theories: - Foundation of morality- Legitimacy of government in the modern Western

world

Hobbes: Morality based on self-interest!

Hobbes, Kant and Rawls

Page 3: Social Contract Theories

3

OutlineOutline

From the state of nature to the social contract

Morality and self-interest: the prisoner’s dilemma

Advantages

Conclusion

Objections and Answers

Page 4: Social Contract Theories

4

The State of NatureThe State of Nature

State of nature = state of war ``of every man against every man”

Why?1- equality of need2- scarcity of resources 3- equality of power4- self interest

The state of nature is to be avoided!

Why is it bad?“and the life of man, solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short”

Page 5: Social Contract Theories

5

The Social ContractThe Social Contract

Foundation: Rational, self-interested people

Components:1st law: each one protects oneself 2nd law: give up the liberties when the others do too, in

order to guarantee peaceful social living 3: Establishment of government necessary – receives the

liberties that the citizen have given up

Entering the Social Contract is the best strategy to satisfy our own interests

Is it true?

Page 6: Social Contract Theories

6

OutlineOutline

From the state of nature to the social contract

Morality and self-interest: the prisoner’s dilemma

Objections and Answers

Conclusion

Advantages

Page 7: Social Contract Theories

7

The Prisoner Dilemma: The Prisoner Dilemma: (Flood and Mesmer 1950)(Flood and Mesmer 1950)

The game:

Cooperation is the best rational choice in cases of inter-related interests

Jones accuses S.

Jones does not

Smith accuses J.

5/5 10/0

Smith does not

0/10 1/1Rational answer for each prisoner: To accuse the otherResult: worse for both than cooperation

Game Theory

Page 8: Social Contract Theories

8

OutlineOutline

From the state of nature to the social contract

Morality and self-interest: the prisoner’s dilemma

Objections and Answers

Conclusion

Advantages

Page 9: Social Contract Theories

9

Advantages of Social Contract Advantages of Social Contract TheoriesTheories

1. Foundation of moral social behavior: where the rules come from and why we follow them

2. Bounds on morality:- Private vs public life- Civil disobedience- No moral favors required

SCT restrict morality to the necessary rules for peaceful social living

Foundation of Democratic Governement

Page 10: Social Contract Theories

10

OutlineOutline

From the state of nature to the social contract

Morality and self-interest: the prisoner’s dilemma

Objections and Answers

Conclusion

Advantages

Page 11: Social Contract Theories

11

Objections and AnswersObjections and Answers

Objections Answers

Egoism(Hobbes)

Impartiality(Kant, Rawls)

Actual Contract(Hobbes)

Implicit Contract(Kant, Rawls)

No responsibility outside of contract(Hobbes)

Page 12: Social Contract Theories

12

OutlineOutline

From the state of nature to the social contract

Morality and self-interest: the prisoner’s dilemma

Objections and Answers

Conclusion

Advantages

Page 13: Social Contract Theories

13

Social Contract TheoriesSocial Contract TheoriesConclusionConclusion

Deficient as a foundation of moralityMoral behavior is more than rational behavior between

rational agentsSuccessful as a foundation of political authorityReminder: legal vs moralObligations and Rights of citizens in modern democracies