skulls demolish darwin 1e

8/8/2019 Skulls Demolish Darwin 1e

1/197


2/197


3/197


4/197


5/197


6/197

Now writing under the pen-name of HARUN YAHYA, Adnan Oktar

was born in Ankara in 1956. Having completed his primary and second-

ary education in Ankara, he studied arts at Istanbul's Mimar Sinan

University and philosophy at Istanbul University. Since the 1980s, he has

published many books on political, scientific, and faith-related issues.

Harun Yahya is well-known as the author of important works disclosing

the imposture of evolutionists, their invalid claims, and the dark liaisons

between Darwinism and such bloody ideologies as fascism and

communism.

Harun Yahya's works, translated into 57 different languages,

constitute a collection for a total of more than 45,000 pages with30,000 illustrations. His pen-name is a composite of the names

Harun (Aaron) and Yahya (John), in memory of the two es-

teemed prophets who fought against their peoples' lack of

faith. The Prophet's seal on his books' covers is symbolic

and is linked to their contents. It represents the Qur'an

(the Final Scripture) and Prophet Muhammad (saas),

last of the prophets. Under the guidance of the Qur'an

and the Sunnah (teachings of the Prophet [saas]), the

author makes it his purpose to disprove each funda-

mental tenet of irreligious ideologies and to havethe "last word," so as to completely silence the ob-

jections raised against religion. He uses the seal

of the final Prophet (saas), who attained ulti-

mate wisdom and moral perfection, as a sign

of his intention to offer the last word.

All of Harun Yahya's works share

one single

goal: to convey the Qur'an's

message, encourage read-

ers to consider basic

faith-related issues

such as Allah's ex-

istence

ABOUT THE AUTHOR


7/197

and unity and the Hereafter; and to expose irreligious systems' feeble foundations and perverted

ideologies. Harun Yahya enjoys a wide readership in many countries, from India to America,

England to Indonesia, Poland to Bosnia, Spain to Brazil, Malaysia to Italy, France to Bulgaria and

Russia. Some of his books are available in English, French, German, Spanish, Italian, Portuguese,

Urdu, Arabic, Albanian, Chinese, Swahili, Hausa, Dhivehi (spoken in Mauritius), Russian, Serbo-

Croat (Bosnian), Polish, Malay, Uygur Turkish, Indonesian, Bengali, Danish and Swedish.

Greatly appreciated all around the world, these works have been instrumental in many peo-

ple recovering faith in Allah and gaining deeper insights into their faith. His books' wisdom and

sincerity, together with a distinct style that's easy to understand, directly affect anyone who reads

them. Those who seriously consider these books, can no longer advocate atheism or any other per-

verted ideology or materialistic philosophy, since these books are characterized by rapid effec-tiveness, definite results, and irrefutability. Even if they continue to do so, it will be only a senti-

mental insistence, since these books refute such ideologies from their very foundations. All con-

temporary movements of denial are now ideologically defeated, thanks to the books written by

Harun Yahya.

This is no doubt a result of the Qur'an's wisdom and lucidity. The author modestly intends to

serve as a means in humanity's search for Allah's right path. No material gain is sought in the pub-

lication of these works.

Those who encourage others to read these books, to open their minds and hearts and guide

them to become more devoted servants of Allah, render an invaluable service.

Meanwhile, it would only be a waste of time and energy to propagate other books that createconfusion in people's minds, lead them into ideological chaos, and that clearly have no strong and

precise effects in removing the doubts in people's hearts, as also verified from previous experience.

It is impossible for books devised to emphasize the author's literary power rather than the noble

goal of saving people from loss of faith, to have such a great effect. Those who doubt this can read-

ily see that the sole aim of Harun Yahya's books is to overcome disbelief and to disseminate the

Qur'an's moral values. The success and impact of this service are manifested in the readers' con-

viction.

One point should be kept in mind: The main reason for the continuing cruelty, conflict, and

other ordeals endured by the vast majority of people is the ideological prevalence of disbelief. This

can be ended only with the ideological defeat of disbelief and by conveying the wonders of cre-

ation and Qur'anic morality so that people can live by it. Considering the state of the world today,

leading into a downward spiral of violence, corruption and conflict, clearly this service must be

provided speedily and effectively, or it may be too late.

In this effort, the books of Harun Yahya assume a leading role. By the will of Allah, these

books will be a means through which people in the twenty-first century will attain the peace, jus-

tice, and happiness promised in the Qur'an.


8/197


9/197


10/197

INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10

The Impact of Fossil Skulls on

Darwinism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .16

SOME SPECIMENS OF FOSSIL SKULLS

Monkey skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .32

White wolf skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .33

Panda skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .34

Hyena skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .35

Horse skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .36

Snow leopard skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .37

Bear skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .38

African lion skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .39Golden monkey skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .40

Pony skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .41

Caribbean monk seal skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .42

Grey wolf skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .43

Raccoon skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .44

Zebra skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .45

Bear skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .46

Horse skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .47

Panda skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .48

Indian civet cat skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .49Malayan sun bear skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .50

Siberian wolf skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .51

Tasmanian devil skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .52

Tibetan wild donkey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .53

Maned wolf skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .54

Monkey skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .55

Asian wild horse skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .56

Grizzly bear skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .57

Snow leopard skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .58

Foal skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .59

Tasmanian wolf skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .60

Wild horse skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .61

Jungle cat skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .62

Jackal skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .63

Wild dog skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .64

Pony skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .65

Lynx skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .66

Camel skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .67


Bear skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .69

Hyena skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .70

Lion skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .71

Turtle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .72

Asian lion skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .74

Donkey skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .75

Lynx skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .76

Arctic fox skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .77

Jackal skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .78

Coyote skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .79

Seal skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .80

Leopard skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .81

Wild cat skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .82

Red wolf skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .83

Lion skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .84

Brown bear skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .85Asian black bear skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .86

Polecat skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .87

Spotted seal skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .88

Grey fox skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .89

Red fox skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .90

Jackal skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .91

Brown bear skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .92

Wolf skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .94

Black bear skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .95

Striped jackal skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .96Wild dog skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .97

Bear skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .98

Aardwolf skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .99

Bat-eared fox skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .100

Bear skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .101

Aardwolf skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .102

Lion skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .103

Tasmanian devil skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .104

Weasel skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .105

Wild boar skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .106

Wild boar skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .107

Zebra skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .108

Cheetah skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .109

Lion skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .110

Brown hyena skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .111

Antelope skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .112

Antelope skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .113

Polar bear skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .114

Wild dog skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .115


Black wolf skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .117

Jaguar skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .118


11/197

Lion skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .119

Small Indian civet cat skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . .120

Wolf skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .121

Asian golden cat skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .122

Red wolf skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .123

Giraffe skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .124

Zebra skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .125

Red panda skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .126

Fox skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .127

Wild donkey skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .128

Wolverine skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .129

Hyena skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .130

Asian wild dog skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .131

Tiger skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .132Fox skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .133

Red panda skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .134

Wolf skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .135

Hyena skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .136

Caribbean monk seal skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .137

Wolf skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .138

Black bear skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .139

Lion skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .140

Brown bear skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .141


Brown bear skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .143


Steppe polecat skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .145

Hyena skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .146

Panda skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .147

Zebra skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .148

Hyena skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .149

Wild hunting dog skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .150

Brown bear skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .151

Lion skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .152

Asian wild horse skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .153

Tiger skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .154

Fox skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .155

Rabbit skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .156

Cormorant skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .157

Raccoon skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .158

Coyote skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .159

Zebra skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .160

Antelope skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .161

Tiger skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .162

Wolf skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .163Hyena skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .164

Weasel skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .165

Turtle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .166

Brown bear skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .167

Wolf skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .168

Arctic fox skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .169

Tiger skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .170

Panda skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .171

Bear skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .172


Tiger skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .174

Antelope skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .175

Spotted deer skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .176

Rhinoceros skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .177

Hyena skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .178Dhole skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .179

Wild boar skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .180

Wolverine skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .181

Wolf skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .182

Fisher marten skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .183

Tibetan sand fox skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .184

Spectacled bear skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .185

Wolf skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .186

Dhole skull . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .187

CONCLUSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .188

The Burial of Darwinism as Europe

Awakens . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .190


12/197

THE SKULLS THAT DEMOLISH DARWIN

10 Harun Yahya

According to Darwinists erroneous way of thinking, they supposed there is only one

explanation for the emergence of living things in nature: All are descended from the

very first living cell, which developed spontaneously as the result of blind coincidences.

Over the course of timeand again by chanceearlier species gradually trans-

formed into other genetically different species. To put it another way, Darwinism feels

that in order to account for the emergence of life, all thats needed are coincidences, nat-

ural events and long periods of time. According to Darwinists, life emerged through a

combination of these accidents, for which reason there can be no question of such con-

cepts as reason, intelligence or even consciousness (Allah is beyond this) playing any

part in the process.

From their assertion, it follows that the fossil recordand specifically, fossil skullsshould contain clear evidence of this imaginary unconscious process that took place

over millions of years. If species really are descended from earlier life forms, then inter-

mediate signs of the process should be visible throughout the fossil record. If life forms

reach their most advanced forms at the end of a number of previous stages, then the

number of fossilized life forms in the process of changingfrom fish to reptiles, from

reptiles to mammals, and from mammals to intermediate life forms that supposedly

took to flying in the air, should be much greater than the number of fossils that had

completed the imaginary evolutionary process.

There should be billions of such fossils, and the fictitious process of evolution should

be crystal clear from them. The fossil record, therefore, should constitute one of themost important proofs of the theory of evolution.

And in fact, Charles Darwin himself was well aware of this:

If my theory be true, numberless intermediate varieties, linking most closely all the species of the

same group together, must assuredly have existed. . . . Consequently, evidence of their former exis-

tence could be found only amongst fossil remains.1

. . . the number of intermediate and transitional links, between all living and extinct species, must

have been inconceivably great.2

But the truth revealed by the fossil record is very different! Millions of fossils belong-

ing to tens of thousands of different species have been discovered. All of these represent

fully formed and complete life forms, each with a perfect appearance and complexity.There is no trace of the intermediate species expected by Darwin and so longed for by

all Darwinists since.

INTRODUCTION


13/197


Adnan Oktar 11

DARWINS IRRATIONAL AND

UNSCIENTIFIC FORMULA

According to Darwinist logic, tigers, hares, cats, but-

terflies, and brightly colored flowersas well as

thinking, reasoning, feeling human beings capable of tak-

ing precautions and signing their names to scientific ad-

vanceshave all emerged by chance, spontaneously,

ever since when natural elements and phenomena such

as mud, rain, lightning, thunder and wind combined over

long periods of time to create life. However, this myth is

so ridiculous that not even a primary school student

could possibly believe it.


14/197


12 Harun Yahya

Not a single intermediate form has been found anywhere in the world. Life forms tens of millions

of years old have exactly the same appearance as their living counterparts today. Ants, flies, fish,

bears, spiders, tigers and lions alive today are exactly the same as their counterparts that lived mil-lions of years in the past. All have exactly the same levels of complexity as their ancient counterparts.They have never changedin other words, they never evolved.

This applies to all the other living things on Earth, plants and animals alike. Fish have never

changed, and neither have birds. Reptiles have survived unchanged, and so have crustaceans. Thereare countless fossil specimens that show that living things have never changed. This is the truthplaced on display throughout the volumes that comprise the Atlas of Creation series. These booksconsider only a very small part of all the fossils that demonstrate how living things have always re-mained exactly the same. Without exception, all the millions of fossils obtained to date, constitute ev-idence that evolution never happened.

The fossils presented in this book totally demolish one of Darwinists major claims: their scenario of

mammalian evolution. These fossil skulls, millions of years old, show that these mammals lived in exact-ly the same forms as those alive todaywhich fact deals a serious blow to Darwinism. The realization

The photo below shows a fossil researcher de-

termining the borders between one rock layer

and the other strata. This process involves the

identification of all the strata present, the for-

mation process involved and the movement of

the Earth that is still going on. Thus the age of

fossils as well as their location can both be

determined.


15/197

No trace of any life form that could possibly be proposed

as the supposed ancestor of the starfish has ever been

found. Neither have starfish been observed to develop in-

to any other life form. They have been in existence for

hundreds of millions of years, and if Darwinist claims were

true, they should long ago have turned into other forms of

marine life, or even have become terrestrial creatures. Yet

no such transition has ever taken place. This 430-million-

year-old starfish fossil completely refutes all claims that

evolution represents the origin of new species.

A 125-million-year-old spider

fossil and a

specimen living

today.

Excavations carried out over the last

150 years have always produced evi-

dence that totally discredits evolu-

tion. One such is this 50-million-year-

old crab fossil unearthed at MonteBaldo in Italy, which demonstrates

that crabs have always existed as

crabs.

One substance in which the very best-preserved fossils appear is amber.

Fossils within amber resulted when the clear sap or resin secreted by treessolidifies around living things and preserved them as they were at the

very moment of death. These 25-million-year-old flying ants are

specimens that invalidate the theory of evolution.


16/197


17/197


Adnan Oktar 15

that so many birds, reptiles, fish and finally mammals never underwent evolution strongly suggeststhat the idea of human evolution is utter nonsense, too. The idea of human evolution, for which

Darwinists have been unable to provide any shred of evidence, has been totally discredited by themillions of living fossils representing species that are still alive today.

The fossils depicted in this book represent just a very few of the mammal skulls discovered to date.

Anyone with common sense who examines these will agree that each fossil shows that the given spe-cies of mammal has remained unchanged in the form in which it was originally created. That, in turn,will lead to a better understanding of the deceptive nature of Darwinism, which maintains that hu-man beings are only another species of animal descended from apes. In the same way that evolutionnever happened over the course of natural history, so there is no equivalent turning point in hu-man history. All the hoaxes perpetrated to keep this deception alive have been proven vain. The sub-

lime and flawless Creation of our Lord Allah, the Creator and sole Lord of all entities, is plain for ev-eryone to grasp. The artistry of our Lord, Who creates from nothing, is displayed all over the world.

You can see this for yourself merely from glancing at a rose in the garden, at a birds wing, at allthe countless living species in all their variety, or at the magnified image of just one single cell. Thefossil record has provided plentiful evidence that makes it impossible to deny this immaculateCreation. No objections can any longer be raised to this conclusive evidence.

Darwinists are struggling in vain because willingly or not, they have finally come to admit thedeath of the theory of evolution. All their efforts aimed at keeping Darwinism alive are helpless anddespairing. Nobody any longer attach any credence to Darwinism. No doubt, the most rational courseof action is to see the truth and shun ones past errors, abandon any false dream, and to cease wast-ing ones time in this worldwhich was created as a place of testingon such a hollow goal.


18/197


THE IMPACT OF FOSSIL SKULLS ON DARWINISM

Darwins thesis that human beings and apes are descended from a common ancestor wasnever supported by any scientific findings, neither when he first proposed it, not afterward.All the efforts exerted from then to the presenta period of some 150 yearshave been invain. All the fossils obtained to date have proved that apes have always existed as apes, thathuman beings have always existed as human beings, that apes did not turn into humans andthat apes, and that humans have no common ancestor.

Despite Darwinists intensive propaganda and efforts aimed at intimidating academic cir-

cles, many scientists have nevertheless issued unequivocal statements that the idea of humanevolution is not based on any scientific data. One such is the Harvard University paleoan-thropologist David Pilbeam:

If you brought in a smart scientist from another discipline and

showed him the meager evidence weve got, hed surely say, Forget

it; there isn't enough to go on.3

William Fox, whose book The Bone Peddlers takespaleoanthropology as its subject matter, also says thatso-called human evolution is unsupported by any

scientific findings:

As we have seen, there are numerous scientists and

popularizes today who have the temerity to tell us that

Harun Yahya16

This fossil tiger

skull shows that ti-

gers have been ex-

actly the same for

the last 80 million

years, without un-

dergoing any altera-

tions.


19/197


Adnan Oktar 17

there is no doubt how man originated. If only they had the evidence. . . . .4

Faced by the disappointment inflicted on them by the fossil record and their own lack of

evidence, evolutionists were reduced to setting skulls out one after the other, in a totally in-valid sequence, and to speculating about these fossils, whose fraudulent nature had in anycase long since been documented.

In fact, the analysis of skulls belonging to apes, other life forms, and to human races thatonce lived in the past shows that all of them possessed all their characteristics during thecourse of their existence, and that they never underwent any changes. Living things neverevolved, but were all created by Allah. As you shall see from the specimens included in thefollowing pages, just as numerous life forms such as frogs, lizards, dragonflies, flies andcockroaches have undergone no changes in their limbs and other organs, so have their heads

undergone no changes. The head regions of birds and fish have also remained unchanged.The skulls of countless mammals such as leopards, wolves, foxes, tigers, rhinoceroses, ti-

gers, pandas, lions and hyenas have also stayed exactly the same over the millions of yearssince they were first created. This stability constitutes a definitive refutation of the idea thatliving things evolved.

The stability that all these life forms reveal also applies to human beings. In the

same way that the skull structures of tens of thousands of species have notchanged over millions of years, so there have been no alterations in thehuman skull. Fish have always existed as fish, birds as birds, rep-tiles as reptiles, and human s as human beings. There is noevidence of steady progress from the primitive tothe more advanced, of the kind claimed by

evolutionists, in the organs or structures

of any living thing.In relating the fictitious story of hu-

man evolution, evolutionists point tothe volume, eyebrow protrusions

or brow structures of theskulls they find, and set uptheir own supposed evo-


20/197


18 Harun Yahya

lutionary sequence and family trees. But the structural differences in fossil skulls are no evi-dence of evolution: These skulls belong either to extinct species of apes, or else to various hu-

man races that once existed. It is entirely logical that skulls belonging to different human ra-ces should display structural differences. Different species of fish have differently shaped

heads. For example, the head shape of a trout bears no resemblance to that of an eel, althoughboth are fish. Similarly, there may be differences between the skulls of different human races.

It is perfectly natural that there should be differences in the eye sockets, forehead struc-tures, muscular structures and skull volumes between Pygmies and

British people, Russians and Chinese, Australian Aborigines andEskimos, Negroes and Japanese But these differences do not

mean that one race is descended from another, or is more prim-itive or more advanced than another. An aboriginal race will al-ways maintain the same distinctive features for as long as it

does not intermarry with members of another race. No matterhow much time passes, these human beings will never evolve

in such a way as to acquire different characteristics. Their skullvolumes will not become any larger than they are now, andthey will not acquire different anatomi-

cal structures.For example, various

Malaysian native peoples living

today possess the same largemuscular protrusions and back-

ward-slanting brow structure

as that of the skulls ofHomoerectus , which evolution-

Many species of ape have existed over

the course of geologic history, and the

great majority of them have since be-

come extinct. Darwinists use these ex-

tinct apes skulls to engage in various

kinds of speculation.


21/197


Adnan Oktar 19

ists regard as being a primitive ancestor. If ev-olutionists claims were true, the Malaysian

natives in question should have a structureand appearance of humans who have recentlyevolved from being apes and have not yet de-veloped fully into Homo sapiens. Yet that is

not the case at all. The fact that anatomical fea-tures of the H. erectusskull can still be seen to-day shows that H. erectuswas not a primitivespecies and also, that evolutionists scenario ofthe human family tree is a fiction.

In short, the fact that some past human ra-ces had anatomical structures different from

human beings alive today in no way consti-tutes evidence in favor of evolution.Anatomical distinctions can be seen in all peri-ods of recorded history and among all differ-

ent human races. Americans and Japanese,Europeans and Australian Aborigines,Eskimos and Negroes or Pygmies all havedistinctively different skulls. But this doesnot mean that some of these races are anymore developed or more backward than the

others.

If, thousands of years in the future, scien-tists discover the skull of an American wholived in the 2000s and was some 1.90 meters

Features of the Homo

erectus skull, such as

the protrusions over

the eyebrows and its

backward-sloping

brow, can also be seen

in certain present-day

races, such as the na-

tive Malaysian on theleft.

An aboriginal race will preserve its charac-

teristic unless it becomes intermixed with an-

other race. It will not, for example, develop

into a Western European race. No matter

how much time elapses, these people will

never evolve in such a way as to acquire dif-

ferent characteristics; will never acquire a

greater skull size than the one they have

now, and will never acquire new anatomical

features.


22/197


20 Harun Yahya

tall, and compare it with the skull of a Japanese individual who also lived in the 2000s but was only1.60 meters tall, they will observe a great many differences between themfirst and foremost, interms of size. If, on the basis of these differences, they then suggest, that the Japanese were primitiveand that Americans were several rungs higher up the developmental ladder, of course they will bemaking an interpretation that in no way reflects the true state of affairs.

In addition, skull volume is no criterion for measuring anyones intelligence or capacities. Thereare many humans with well-developed bodies but insufficiently developed intelligence. In the sameway, many people have bodies and therefore, skulls, smaller than those of others, but who are nev-ertheless highly intelligent. Their skulls cannot be evaluated by the scientists of the future, at leastnot in a scientifically valid way and on the basis of dimensions alone, to set out any supposed evo-lutionary line of progressionbecause that sequence will not reflect the true facts. Differences in

skull size are known to be totally unrelated to intelligence and ability. If someone spends his life inintense mental activity, his skull will not grow in size. Only his mental abilities will get stronger..Intelligence varies, not in relation to skull size, but according to the organization within the brain it-self.5

The following pages offer just a few examples of the countless fossil skulls that invalidate the the-

ory of evolution. These specimens all prove that no life form has ever changed during its natural his-tory; they have all existed with the same features they enjoyed when they were first created. In ad-dition to this evidence, this book also contains statements that indicate and emphasize the dilemmasfacing Darwinist thinking. For example, Darwinists, who illogically maintain that living things de-velop by constant change, are asked to account for the evident stability in every fossil life form. Thetheory of evolution, which suggests that human beings are allegedly descended from apes, has to ex-

plain why no process, similar to the imaginary one it claims took place in apes, occurred in other lifeforms. Evolutionists have no answer as to why a bear did not one day decide to walk on two legs,why a fox did not raise its level of intelligence enough to become a professor, or why a panda never became a composer writing stupendous symphonies. The rea-son why the subject is discussed using examples and logical

progressions accessible even to children is that Darwinismis constructed upon unbelievable illogicality. Depicted as ascientific theory, Darwinism is in fact an unbelievably illogi-cal ideology.

People have now fully realized that Darwinism, the worstscandal in the history of the world, is built around lies, hoaxesand irrational claims. In the 21st century, the whole world is

witnessing Darwinisms collapse.


23/197

Adnan Oktar 21

HUMAN RACES THAT ONCE

EXISTED IN THE PAST ARE NO

EVIDENCE FOR EVOLUTION

The Neanderthals (Homo neanderthalensis)suddenly

emerged in Europe around 100,000 years ago and

became extinctor else became completely assimilat-

ed by other racessome 35,000 years ago. The only

differences between them and present-day humans are

that their rather more powerful skeletons and their

slightly larger average skull sizes. Scientific findings

show that the Neanderthals were a human race no dif-

ferent, in terms of intelligence and cultural levels, from

ourselves.

Cro-Magnon man, on the other hand, is of a race esti-

mated to have lived until 30,000 years ago. It had a

dome-shaped skull and a broad forehead. Its 1600-cu-

bic centimeter skull volume is again, slightly greater than

that of present-day humans. Cro-Magnon had thick pro-

trusions over its eyebrows, and a bony protrusion on the

back of the head that is a characteristic of Neanderthal

man.

The visible differences between the Neanderthals and

Cro-Magnons can also be seen among present-day hu-

man races. In the same way that structural differences

between an Anglo-Saxon and an Eskimo or an African

and a European do not suggest that one race is more

developed or backward than another, so physical differ-

ences between races that existed in the past do not im-

ply that one was more backward or ape-like than any

other. These races disappeared from the Earth by be-

coming assimilated with other races or by becoming ex-

tinct in some other way. But they were still fully fledged

human beings, not at all primitive or ape-like.

THE NEANDERTHAL:THE NEANDERTHAL:

A HUMAN RACEA HUMAN RACE

This flute, made by

Neanderthal man,

shows that they used

the seven-note scalethat constitutes the ba-

sic form of Western

music.

This needle is an-

other proof that

Neanderthal man

was no different

from present-day

human beings.


ALSE IMAGES OF NEANDERTHALS PRODUCED BY EVOLUTIONISTS IN RECENT YEARS

1873 1909 1929 1952 1962 1999 2006

Neanderthal footprints


24/197


22 Harun Yahya

THE MYTH OF HUMAN EVOLUTION IS

FILLED WITH HOAXES

Piltdown Man:A fossil skull was discovered in 1912 and de-

scribed as belonging to a half-human, half-ape species. For

the next 40 years or so, evolutionists used this fossil as one of

their supposedly strongest pieces of evidence, making count-

less analyses and illustrations of it in a statement issued on 21

November 1953, however, Piltdown Man was finally declared

to be a hoax. A dating test performed 40 years after

its discovery revealed that the jawbone and the

skull did not actually belong to each other.

More detailed examination revealed that the

Piltdown Man skull had been assembled by

adding an orangutan jaw to a hu-

man skull, which was then aged

using potassium dichromate. The

way that the skull had been dis-

played in Londons Natural

History Museum for 40 years and

that no permission had been giv-

en for detailed scientific studies

to be carried out during that time

has gone down as a major scien-tific scandal.

DECLASSIFIED

IN1953

Java Man

Pekin Man

Piltdown Man

More than 6,000 species of ape have existed at one time or another. The great ma-

jority of them have since become extinct and vanished, leaving only some 120 spe-

cies alive today. But the fossils belonging to these nearly 6,000 extinct species represent a

rich source of hoaxes for evolutionists. Unable to point to any concrete evidence, evolution-

ists surround fossils of extinct apes with biased analyses and then present them as evi-

dence for evolution.

For years now, evolutionists have been employing such methods in order to gather sup-

porters and mislead the public. However, they now need to see that these methods are of

no use. The false evidence used by evolutionists to make their tall tales of

the alleged human evolution seem more credibleand the debunk-ing of that evidenceare summarized below. However, there

are many more evolutionist hoaxes than the few considered

here. All the ancestor of man reports in the media, as

well as the illustrations accompanying them are com-

pletely fictitious. Concrete scientific discoveries

have now demolished the story that human beings

became human by means of a gradual course of de-

velopment.

Fossils discovered on the islands ofJava in 1891 and 1892 were given the

name Java Man (Pithecanthropus erec-

tus). Fossils discovered near Pekin in

1923-1927 were given the name Pekin

Man (Sinanthropus pekinensis). In

1939, however, two experts, Ralph von

Koenigswald and Franz Weidenreich,

revealed that both were actually normal

human beings.(1) And Ernst Mayr from

Harvard University had classified bothas human in 1944.(2)

DECLASSIFIED

IN1939


25/197


Adnan Oktar 23

ALLTHESKULLTHOUGH

TTOREPRE-SENTEVIDENCEFOREVOLUTIONHAVE

BEENDECLASSIFIED!

These three completely different illustrations pro-duced for the Zinjanthropus fossil are examples of

how evolutionists interpret fossils in a highly imagi-

native manner.

Zinjanthropus: A fossil discovered in 1959and declared to be the ancestor of man.

However, subsequent investigations revealed

that Zinjanthropus was in fact an ordinary

ape in all respects. Zinjanthropus, whose sci-

entific name was twice revised, is regarded

by contemporary evolutionists as an extinct

life form with nothing to do with human be-

ings.(3)

Nebraska Man: A single tooth, discovered in 1922

by Henry F. Osborn of the American Museum of

Natural History, was depicted as belonging to an

intermediate life form between apes and human

beings. However, in an article published in

Science magazine in 1927, Osborns colleague

William Gregory stated that the tooth actually be-

longed to a wild boarwhereupon all evolutionist

claims regarding the fossil were quietly laid aside.

The illustration to the side, produced on the basis

of a single tooth by evolutionists of the time, was

published in the press.

This attempt by evolutionists to reconstruct a liv-

ing thing on the basis of a single tooth is a strik-

ing instance of how biased and misleading they

can be when it comes to defending and imposing

their theories.

ImaginaryImaginary

Reconstru

ction

Reconstru

ction

DECLASSIFIED

IN1927

DECLASSIFIE

D

IN1970


26/197


24 Harun Yahya

Neanderthal Man: After the first speci-

mens were discovered in the Neander

Valley in 1856, evolutionists suggested

that Neanderthals were primitive ape-men.

Subsequent archaeological discoveries,

however, revealed that there was no scientif-

ic basis to that claim. Erik Trinkhaus, an expert on

the subject of the Neanderthals and also an evolutionist, has ad-

mitted that, Detailed comparisons of Neanderthal skeletal re-

mains with those of modern humans have shown that there is

nothing in Neanderthal anatomy that conclusively indicates loco-

motor, manipulative, intellectual, or linguistic abilities inferior to

those of modern humans.(4)

In addition, the size of

the Neanderthal Man

skull200 cubic centime-

ters greater than that of

present-day humansre-

veals the invalidity of the

claim that it was an inter-

mediate form between hu-

mans and apes.

A fossil belonging to the Neanderthal race

DECLASSIFIED

IN1978

The illustration above shows theHomo sapiens neanderthalensis

Amud 1 skull discovered in

Israel. Its owner has been esti-

mated to be 1.80 meters. tall,

and its brain volume is the

greatest so far discovered: 1740

cubic centimeters.

The Taung

child fossil

DECLASSIFIED

IN1954

The Taung Child: A fossil skull discovered by Raymond Dart in South Africa in 1924 was ini-

tially depicted as a supposed ancestor of man. However, contemporary evolutionists can no

longer maintain that it represents such an ancestorbecause it subsequently transpired that

the skull belonged to a young gorilla! The famous anatomist Bernard Wood stated that this fos-

sil constitutes no evidence in favor of evolution in an article published in New Scientistmaga-zine. (5)


27/197


Adnan Oktar 25

Ramapithecus: A partial jawbone, consist-

ing of two parts, was discovered by G.E.

Lewis in India in the 1930s. Based on these

two jaw bone fragments, claimed to be 14

million years old, evolutionists reconstructed

Ramapithecuss family and supposed natural

habitat (at side). For fifty years, the fossil was

portrayed as an ancestor of Man but follow-

ing the results of a 1981 anatomical compar-

ison with a baboon skeleton, evolutionists

were forced to quietly set it aside.(9)

(1) B. Theunissen, Eugene Dubois and the Ape-Man from Java, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989, p. 39. (2) Garniss Curtis, Carl

Swisher and Roger Lewin, Java Man, London: Abacus, , 2000, p. 87. (3) http://www.archaeologyinfo.com/australopithecusboi-

sei.htm (4) Erik Trinkaus, Hard Times Among the Neanderthals, Natural History, Vol. 87, December 1978, p. 10. (5) Bernard

Wood, Who Are We?. New Scientist, 26.10.2002, p. 44. (6) Solly Zuckerman, Beyond The Ivory Tower, New York: Taplinger

Publications, 1970, pp. 75-94; Fred Spoor, Bernard Wood, Frans Zonneveld, Implication of Early Hominid Labryntine

Morphology for Evolution of Human Bipedal Locomotion, Nature, Vol. 369, 23 June 1994, pp. 645-648. (7) Richmond, B.G. and

Strait, D.S., Evidence that humans evolved from a knuckle-walking ancestor. Nature 404(6776): 382, 2000. (8) Discoveryrocks human-origin theories, Tim Friend, 21 March 2003: http://www.usatoday.com/news/ science/2001-03-21-skull.htm

(9) Science Digest, April 1981.

Lucy: This fossil, discovered in Africa in 1974,

was widely esteemed by evolutionists and was

the subject of some of the most intensive spec-

ulation. Recently however, it has been revealed

that Lucy (A. afarensis) had an anatomy ideally

suited to climbing trees and was no different

from other apes we are familiar with. (6) The

French scientific journal Science et Viecovered

the story in 1999 under the headline Adieu,

Lucy.One study, performed in 2000, discov-

ered a locking system in Lucys forearms ena-

bling it to walk using the knuckles, in the same

way as modern-day chimps.(7)

In the face of all these findings, many evolution-

ist experts declared that Lucy could not have

been a forerunner of man.(8)

DECLASSIFIED

IN1981

DECLASSIFIED

IN1999


28/197


26 Harun Yahya

If evolution truly did take

place, then the Earths

strata should be full of bil-

lions of intermediate-form fos-

sils. In addition, these millions of

living things should have been dis-

tinctly abnormal in appearance be-

cause of the effects of mutations. Organs

subjected to mutation many times over

should have turned into abnormal forms.

Before attaining their perfect and attractive present ap-

pearance, these living things must first have had abnormal transitional ap-

pearances. For example, before the emergence of the highly sym-

metrical human face with its two ears, two eyes, nose and

mouth, there must have been a great many abnormal mu-

tated faces with impaired symmetry, imperfectears and eyes, the nose sited right between the

eyes or on the chin, or where the ear should have

been, and countless other such abnormalities.

NOT ONE OF THE INTERMEDIATE FORMS WITH

ABNORMAL STRUCTURESWHICH SHOULD HAVE

EXISTED OVER MILLIONS OF YEARSHAS EVER

BEEN FOUND


29/197


Adnan Oktar 27

Were Darwinists claims true, then the remains of a

great many peculiar living things should be encoun-

tered in the fossil record, as shown in these illustra-

tions: a large number of eye sockets,

noses in different places, a jaw

in both in the front and the

back, an abnormally devel-

oped skull, etc. However,

research conducted over

the last 150 years has

produced absolutely no

such fossil remains. On

the contrary, all the

fossils unearthed so

far show that all liv-

ing things have been

flawless, exhibiting no

deficiencies since the

moment they were first

created, and have never

changed or developed new

features throughout the

course of their existence.


30/197


28 Harun Yahya

THE INVALIDITY OF THE EQUINE

EVOLUTION SERIES SCENARIO

All the horse skulls so far unearthed have been flaw-

less and free from deficiencies, just like those of

present-day horses. None of them have any pathological

features such as semi-developed bones, teeth atop of

the skull, misplaced eyes in the jaw or asymmetrical three

nostrils. Ifas evolutionists would have us believe

horses attained their present forms by constantly chang-

ing and going through a great many different stages, then

a great many skulls should exhibit structural impair-

ments, as seen here.

Traces of the mutations

to which horses were

subjected should also

be visible in the fossil

record. Yet no such tra-

ces have ever been en-

countered. Fossils are

proof that horses never

evolved.

Horses have a wide capacity for variation

among themselves. Breeds of horse living

today, though all of the same species, are

very different in terms of their structures

and dimensions. The error of the evolu-

tionists who set up the so-called equine

evolution series lay in depicting fossils of

these different breeds as an evolutionary

sequence.


31/197


Adnan Oktar 29

Many evolutionists openly admit the invalidity of the

equine evolution scenario. A four-day conference at-

tended by 150 evolutionists held at the Chicago

Museum of Natural History in November 1981, consid-

ered the problems facing the gradual theory of evolu-

tion. At that conference, Boyce Rensberger stated that

there was no basis in the fossil record for the equine

evolution scenario and that no such process as grad-

ual equine evolution ever happened:The popularly told example of horse evolution, sug-

gesting a gradual sequence of changes from four-toed

fox-sized creatures living nearly 50 million years ago

to todays much larger one-toed horse, has long been

known to be wrong. Instead of gradual change, fossils

of each intermediate species appear fully distinct, per-

sist unchanged, and then become extinct. Transitional

forms are unknown. (Boyce Rensberger, Houston

Chronicle, 5 November, 1980, Part 4, p. 15.)

A great many different breeds of hors-

es are living in different parts of the

world today.


32/197


33/197


34/197


32 Harun Yahya

There are countless scenarios concerning the myth of hu-

man evolution, none any scientific basis. All consist of

speculations invented to persuade people to view them-selves as chance entities descended from apes. All the

fossils that Darwinists claimed as intermediate fossils in

the imaginary human evolution series were subsequent-

ly proven to belong either to various species of monkey

or else to human races. It is a scientific fact that monkeys

have always existed as monkeys and never developed

into any other life form. One of the proofs documenting

this is the 32-million-year-old monkey skull illustrated.

This fossil is identical to to the skulls of present-day

monkeys. There are no traces showing any changes inthe direction ofHomo sapiens.

MONKEY SKULL

Age: 32 million years

Period: OligoceneLocation: Qing Dao, China


35/197


Adnan Oktar 33

No one lacking preconceived ideas, but who

thinks in a free and honest manner, can possibly

believe that unconscious atoms assembled them-

selves as the result of chance, organized them-

selves, and gave rise to human beings who think,reason, feel see, hear, make discoveries and pro-

duce works of art. Yet Darwins theory of evolu-

tion imposes just that irrational assumption.

Countless discoveries made in tens of different

fields of science have shown that the supersti-

tious beliefs of Darwinism can no longer be

maintained. One such piece of evidence is the

4.9-million-year-old wolf skull shown here. As

they are regarding all other living things,

Darwinists are in a hopeless position in the

face of this fossil, which proves that wolvesnever evolved.

Age: 4.9 million years

Period: PlioceneLocation: Gan Su, China

WOLF SKULL


36/197


34 Harun Yahya

PANDA SKULL

Panda remains dating back 90 million

years, 73 million years and this 40-mil-

lion-year old skull shown here are all

identical to those of present-day pandas.

Whichever panda remains we may ex-

amine we still see no difference between

them and their present counterparts. The

fossil record contains no trace of pandas

imaginary forerunners. Darwinists spec-

ulation on the subject of the supposed

evolution of pandas and other living

things is meaningless. The scientific evi-

dence cannot be concealed with myths

and suppositions. The theory of evolu-

tion is fated to be condemned as one ofthe 20th centurys worst deceptions.


Period: Eocene

Location: Si Chuan, China


37/197


Adnan Oktar 35

The theory of evolution, developed in the prim-

itive scientific climate in Darwins time andmaintained in an environment of ignorance

through such tactics as imagination, prejudice,

sleight of hand and demagoguery, has now col-

lapsed in the face of modern scientific discover-

ies. The fossil record has shown that intermedi-

ate forms exist only in evolutionists imagina-

tions and that each species was individually cre-

ated. One important example of this is a 4.6-mil-

lion-year-old hyena skull. Living things ap-

peared exactly the same millions of years in the

past as they do today.

Age: 4.6 million yearsPeriod: Pliocene

Location: An Hui, China

HYENA SKULL


38/197

36 Harun Yahya


Period: PlioceneLocation: Ji Lin, China

HORSE SKULL

The history of paleontology is full of examples of fos-

sils that invalidate evolution being hidden away in

museum warehouses. Pictures of the first specimens of

Cambrian Period fossils to be discovered were con-

cealed for 70 years in the storerooms of the

Smithsonian Institution because they represented ma-

jor evidence that fundamentally refuted evolution.Given such an example, it was inevitable that the the-

ory of evolution would attempt to conceal specimens

of countless living fossils subsequently unearthed, and

for exactly the same reason. However, the situation

was by no means what Darwinists had been expecting.

Darwinists never imagined that so many specimens of

so-called living fossils would be discovered. The

number of fossil specimens unearthed in excavations

carried out to date is exceedingly high. One example is

this horse skull dating back 4.3 million years, which is

identical to the skull of present-day horses.



39/197


Adnan Oktar 37

Snow leopards, with their magnificent ap-

pearance, elegant fur and extraordinary

equipment, were in existence as long as 67

million years ago. This 67-million-year-

old snow leopard skull, identical in all re-

spects to the skulls of snow leopards liv-

ing today, makes this crystal-clear.

Contrary to Darwinists expectations, thisanimal which, according to the theory of

evolution, should have taken a very long

time to develop gradually actually ap-

pears suddenly and fully formed in the

fossil record with no intermediate form or

forerunners behind it. Evolutionists need

to account for this sudden and flawless

appearance in the fossil record; yet they

are silent and despairing, because they

know that these remains from the past areactually evidence of Creation.


Period: Cretaceous

Location: Yun Nan, China

SNOW LEOPARD SKULL


40/197


38 Harun Yahya


Period: EoceneLocation: Shan Dong, China

BEAR SKULL

The late evolutionist Stephen Jay Gould ad-

mitted that fossils have never provided any

support for the theory of evolution:

The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the

fossil record persists as the trade secret of pa-

leontology . . . We fancy ourselves as the on-

ly true students of lifes history, yet to pre-

serve our favored account of evolution by

natural selection we view our data as so bad

that we never see the very process we profess

to study.6

As Gould admitted, there is no evidence that

any evolutionary process ever took place. All

scientific findings reveal that life is actually

the work of Almighty Allah. One such find-

ing is a 48-million-year old bear skull.


41/197


AFRICAN LION SKULL

The record jumps, and all the evidence shows that the

record is real: the gaps we see reflect real events in

life's history-not the artifact of a poor fossil

record.7Evolutionist Niles Eldredge

What Eldredge means is that now we have a

sufficiently high number of fossil specimens

to let us see how natural history developed.

In terms of the supposed process of evolu-

tion, however, there are also huge gaps between these specimens. The reason

for this is not any lack of fossilized

examples, but rather that these fos-

sils are incompatible with any ev-

olutionary scenario. The fossil

record documents that evolu-

tion never took place.


Period: Pliocene


Adnan Oktar 39


42/197


40 Harun Yahya

GOLDEN MONKEY SKULL

As a basis for claiming that human beings are descend-

ed from apes, Darwinists point to the imitative

ability of certain species of monkey. Monkeys

are able to mimic actions and behavior they

see, but this does not allow them to eventual-

ly evolve into human beings. If it did, then

other species of animal also known to be in-

telligent should also have become possessed

of human attributes. Parrots, for example,

are also able to mimic human speech.

Therefore, according to Darwinistsnonsensical claims, there must be a

greater likelihood of parrots develop-

ing human speech.

Countless findings, such as the 36-mil-

lion-year-old monkey skull illustrated

here, prove that living things have always

remained the same, have never changed,

and never developed into any other life

formand that its meaningless to insist on

such illogical claims.


Period: Eocene

Location: Si Chuan,

China


43/197


Adnan Oktar 41


Period: Eocene

Location: Gui Zho-u,

China

PONY SKULL

If evolutionist logic were correct, ponies should long since have

developed into larger horses. However, as the fossil record

makes perfectly clear, ponies have survived for tens of millions

of years without undergoing even the slightest change.

This stability, or stasis, applies to all living species, and repre-

sents one of the most serious problems confronting Darwinism,

because it demolishes evolutions fundamental claim, that all

living things are descended from a supposed common

ancestor and have diversified by one species

evolving into others.


44/197


42 Harun Yahya

Darwinists cannot account for the trilobites eye, which these crustaceans already possessed as

long as 530 million years ago. Darwinists cannot explain how living things in the sea, on land

and in the air appeared suddenly and survived unchanged for the entire course of their exis-

tence. Darwinists maintain that one species developed into another, but they cannot explain

how a single original cell could change in such a way as to assume different functions in a mul-

ti-cellular creature. Darwinism is a theory at a dead end, and is gradually dying out as new dis-

coveries are made with every passing day. The 3.1-million-year-old Caribbean monk seal skull

shown here is one of the many proofs to accelerate this process of disappearance.


Period: Pliocene


CARRIBEAN MONK SEAL SKULL


45/197


Adnan Oktar 43

GREY WOLF SKULL

As evidence for the so-called evolution of man, Darwinists

pointed to a very limited number of fossils. Many years ago,

they interpreted them as their most important specimens of

intermediate forms. However, subsequent scientific

progress has shown that the fossils in question be-

longed either to monkeys or else to hu-

man races that existed at some time

in the past. For that reason, all the

so-called evidence for human evolu-

tion has gradually been removed

from the scientific literature. The on-ly reason why some Darwinist publi-

cations still refer to these fossils is en-

tirely speculativethey are of no scien-

tific value at all.

Another scientific finding that reveals

that the evolution of man is a lie and that

human beings did not evolve from any

previous life form is the countless num-

bers of fossils unearthed. One such ex-

ample is this 69-million-year-old grey

wolf skull, showing that this species of

animal has never changed over the

course of millions of years. This stasis,

which applies to all living things, cer-

tainly applies to monkeys as well.


Period: Cretaceous

Location: Shan Dong, China


46/197


44 Harun Yahya


Period: Pliocene

Location: Gan Su, China

RACCOON SKULL

Fossil specimens dating back millions of years, when compared with present-day life forms, reveal

that there was no transition in morphology and that evolution from one species to another never

happened. This fact applies equally to ants and butterflies, polar bears and lizards, and fruit flies

and zebras. Darwins theory of evolution is unsupported by any scientific findings whatsoever. No

evidence to support it has ever been produced since Darwins day. And with every passing day, the

fossil record makes that lack of evidence even more obvious. This 4.3-million-year-old raccoon skull

clearly shows that Darwin was completely wrong.


47/197


Adnan Oktar 45


Period: Pliocene

Location: Quing Hai, China

ZEBRA SKULL

Allah has created the zebra with all its magnificent

attributes, as He has all other living things. It is Allah

Who created their distinguishing and highly attract-

ive stripes that set them apart from other four-

footed species. This is the reality that

Darwinists are unable to understand, findit difficult to grasp and even, in the ma-

jority of cases, stubbornly refuse to

see. Paleontology reveals this reali-

ty, however, through countless ex-

amples. The 3.4-million-year-old

zebra skull shown here refutes

evolution and declares that

Creation is the truth.


48/197


46 Harun Yahya

Darwinists have created a story to explain the sup-

posed evolution of every single life form. Since

Darwinism is not based upon reason, logic or any

scientific evidence, producing a scenario regard-

ing the development of a specific life form de-

pends on the power of conjecture, Darwinists

most highly developed talent. But Darwinists nev-

er expected that so many fossils would be discov-

ered revealing that living never changed with the

passage of time. They imagined that living fossilswere very few in number and could easily be ex-

plained away, at least to their own minds. They

never thought that such definitive proof would

be unearthed that all living things have re-

mained exactly the same. Therefore, they never

expected that one by one, all their tall tales

would be totally discredited. They were una-

ware that every plot would eventually, as a

law of Allah, be neutralized.

Since this 4.4-million-year-old bear skull is iden-

tical to the skulls of bears alive today, it constitutesa definitive refutation of the theory of evolution.

BEAR SKULL


Period: Pliocene

Location: Zi Bo, China


49/197


Adnan Oktar 47

The fossil illustrated on this page constitutes yet another piece of evidence that de-

molishes the equine evolution myth, which Darwinists are still employing today as

one of their most important propaganda

tools. This 2.8-million-year-old horses

head was identical to horses living in thepresent day, showing that the equine ev-

olution sequences still displayed in natu-

ral history museums today are false, and

of no scientific value. Given this scientif-

ic reality, it is pointless for Darwinists to

place representative illustrations in their

publications, in an attempt to reinvigor-

ate this fictitious scenario through the

use of reconstructions and displays of

fraudulent evolutionary series in natural

history museums. The theory of horseevolution has been totally and utterly

disproved.


Period: Pliocene

Location: He Zheng, China

HORSE SKULL


50/197



Period: Pliocene


PANDA SKULL

This fossil shows that pandas have

always existed as pandas, and alsototally refutes the idea of the evo-

lution of living things. To date,

they never have found one single

fossil indicating the supposed an-

cestor of the panda or that indi-

cates that pandas underwent vari-

ous intermediate stages before at-

taining their present-day form. No

matter how old, every single pan-

da fossil unearthed discovered has

exactly the same characteristics as

those possessed by present-day

pandas. Darwinists are completely

helpless in the face of this reality.


51/197


Adnan Oktar 49


Period: Eocene


In 1993, Stephen Jay Gould wrote in

the magazine Natural History about

the way living species things can beobserved to have exactly the same

characteristics throughout the fossil

record:

Stasis, or nonchange of most fossil spe-

cies during their lengthy geological life-

spans, was tacitly acknowledged by all

paleontologists, but almost never stud-

ied explicitly because prevailing theory

treated stasis as uninteresting nonevi-

dence for nonevolution . . . [T]he over-

whelming prevalence of stasis becamean embarrassing feature of the fossil

record, but left ignored as a manifesta-

tion of nothing (that is, nonevolution).8

The only reason why evolutionists refer

to the stasis in the fossil record as em-

barrassing is that if living things expe-

rience no changes, that invalidates the

theory of evolution. This information,

which shows that evolution never hap-

pened, is evidence for the fact of

Creation.

INDIAN CIVET CAT


52/197


50 Harun Yahya

MALAYAN SUN BEAR


Period: Miocene


In his book In Search of Deep Time, Henry

Gee states that no evidence in the fossil record

supports the theory of evolution and that on

the contrary, evolutionists interpret the infor-

mation available to them in a biased manner,

in the light of their own preconceptions:

The reason for this lies with the fact of the

scale of geological time that scientists are deal-

ing with, which is so vast that it defies narra-

tive.9

As Gee makes clear, the fossil record has

shown that Darwinisms claims regarding life

and the origin of life are totally unrealistic. Countless examples, such as the 6.7-million-year-old sun

bear skull shown here, prove that Darwinism consists of a hypothesis bearing no relation whatsoev-

er to the true facts.


53/197


Adnan Oktar 51

The 47-million-year-old Siberian wolf skull shown

illustrated has been perfectly preserved for 47 mil-

lion years, and its appearance is no different at all

from that of present-day Siberian wolves. Such important indications in the fossil record entire-

ly defeat all the various efforts to keep the theory of evolution alive over the last 150 years or so.

All the fossils we have in our possession say the same thing; Animals have remained unchanged

for millions of years and look just like their present-day counterparts. In other words, they nev-

er evolved.


Period: Eocene


SIBERIAN WOLF SKULL


54/197


52 Harun Yahya


Period: Oligocene


The British paleontologist Derek W.

Ager describes how the fossil record

poses a major difficulty for the theory ofevolution:

The point emerges that if we examine

the fossil record in detail, whether at the

level of orders or of species, we find

over and over againnot gradual

evolution, but the sudden explosion

of one group at the expense of an-

other.10

One fossil that proves that its spe-

cies never passed through any in-

termediate stages is the 32-million-year-old Tasmanian devil skull pic-

tured here.

TASMANIAN DEVIL SKULL


55/197


Adnan Oktar 53

Evolutionists attempts to portray the wild don-

key as the ancestor of the horse are totally hol-

low. Fossils have proved that wild donkeys

have always existed as wild donkeys, and are

not descended from any other life form. The

fossil illustrated shows that wild donkeys liv-

ing 27 million years ago were identical to those

living todaywhich effectively silences all evo-

lutionist claims.

New species did not emerge as the result of mu-

tations and blind coincidences. It is Almighty

Allah, Who possesses a sublime creative power,

Who created them all.


Period: Oligocene

Location: Yin Chuan, China

TIBETAN WILD DONKEY


56/197


54 Harun Yahya


Period: Miocene


The fossil record poses a major problem for the theory

of evolution. From time to time, this fact is admitted by

evolutionists themselves, as in the words of the evolu-

tionist and paleontologist Mark Czarnecki:

A major problem in proving the theory [of evolution]

has been the fossil record; the imprints of vanished spe-

cies preserved in the Earths geological formations.

This record has never revealed traces of Darwins hy-

pothetical intermediate variantsinstead, species ap-

pear and disappear abruptly, and this anomaly has fu-eled the creationist argument that each species was cre-

ated by God.11

MANED WOLF SKULL


57/197


Adnan Oktar 55

Not one single fossil possessing

half-ape and half-human char-

acteristics has ever been

found. All the fossils por-

trayed at one time or anoth-

er as evidence for the sup-

posed evolution of man

have later been exposed ashoaxes, and all have been

withdrawn by evolutionists

themselves. All they have left

are scenarios based on

Darwinists imaginations.

Concrete findings have proved that mon-

keys have always existed as monkeys,

while human beings have always been

human. One such finding is the 32-mil-

lion-year-old monkey

skull shown here.


Period: Oligocene

Location: Qing Dao, China

MONKEY SKULL


58/197


56 Harun Yahya


Period: Miocene


ASIAN WILD HORSE SKULL

Another serious blow to the scenario of

horse evolution comes from the 33-mil-lion-year-old Asian wild horse shown

here. This creature has exactly the same

characteristics as those of present-day

Asian horses, and nothing about it sug-

gests that it developed from a primi-

tive form to a more advanced one.

All its exceedingly complex fea-

tures are fully complete, and in

their modern-day places. The

search for an intermediate

transition 33 million yearsago has ended in disap-

pointment for evolution-

ists, producing only ex-

amples of Asian wild hors-

es with the same perfect

anatomy as those living to-

day.


59/197


Adnan Oktar 57

GRIZZLY BEAR SKULL

Over the last two years, various publications

have illustrated countless fossils that prove,

that living things did not evolve by chang-

ing from one form into another. As with the

53-million-year-old grizzly bear skull shown

here, these fossils are all identical to species

in existence today and have remained un-

changed over millions of years. No scientific

objection to this reality has been forthcom-

ing from Darwinists. They cannot offer any

logical explanation for even one single fossil.

The reason is because fossils dating back

millions of years represent ancient examples

of living things in existence today.


Period: Eocene

Location: Shan Dong,

China


60/197


58 Harun Yahya


Period: Oligocene

Location: Dong Bei,

China

SNOW TIGER SKULL

Darwinism is not able to gloss over the

scientific evidence that there is no such

thing as evolution. Cellular mutations

have no reason or consciousness; they are

unable to see, hear, think or take precau-

tionary measures; they have no artistic or

aesthetic power. Such happenstance

events cannot possibly give rise to living

things that do take precautions, that ex-

hibit artistry and beauty, and offer clear

evidence that they were created with in-

telligence and consciousness. Fossils dat-

ing back millions of years have definitive-

ly demolished this Darwinist deception.

The life forms in the fossil record appear

suddenly, having been created. For exam-

ple, this snow tiger skull dating back 32

million years is no different from speci-

mens alive today.


61/197


Adnan Oktar 59

That individual kinds of fossils remain recognizably

the same throughout the length of their occurrence in

the fossil record had been known to paleontologists

long before Darwin published his Origin. Darwin

himself . . . prophesied that future generations of pale-

ontologists would fill in these gaps by diligent search .

. . .One hundred and twenty years of paleontological

research later, it has become abundantly clear that thefossil record will not confirm this part of Darwins pre-

dictions. Nor is the problem a miserably poor record.

The fossil record simply shows that this prediction is

wrong.12

These words from the evolutionist paleontologist

Niles Eldredge help explain the 3.2-million-year

foal skull in the picture. This creature, which has

remained unchanged over millions of years, is a

manifestation of a truth that Darwinists have in

fact been aware of ever since Darwins lifetime.


Period: Pliocene

Location: Yun Nan,

China

FOAL SKULL


62/197


60 Harun Yahya


Period: Cretaceous

Location: Li Yi, China

TASMANIAN WOLF SKULL

The Tasmanian wolf became extinct in the mid-

20th century, yet the fossil record contains repre-

sentatives of the species that date back 73 mil-

lion years. This Tasmanian wolf fossil, 73 mil-

lion years old, possesses exactly the same fea-tures as the last Tasmanian wolves that scien-

tists observed. This is striking evidence that the

various supposed intermediate forms that

Darwinists have submitted as supporting their

theories are in fact simply conjecture. Living

things that have since become extinct, of which

no living specimens survive, are all fully

formed, complete and highly complex, as the

fossil record demonstrates. This means that the

evolutionist idea of gradual development ab-solutely does not reflect the true facts.


63/197


Adnan Oktar 61


Period: Eocene

Location: Meng Gu,

China

WILD HORSE SKULL

Evolutionists attempt to mislead people by tamp-

ering with fossils belonging to various extinct lifeforms and coming up with deceptive scenarios.

One of the best-known is the myth of the evolu-

tion of the horse. Evolutionists set out fossils be-

longing to living things that existed at different times in India, South America, North America and

Europe in order of sizefrom small to largeat the prompting of their own imaginations. In this

way, they came up with a totally unrealistic sequence. Different researchers have produced more

than 20 horse evolution sequences, all very different from one another, and there is no evolutionist

consensus regarding any of them.

Once again, the heaviest blow to evolutionists fictitious family trees came from the fossil record. All

the horse fossils ever discovered have proved that horses have always existed as horses.


64/197


62 Harun Yahya

Fossil skulls are among the best evidence that

living things have never changed over the

course of history, have never developed

into other life forms, and that every

living species has been created to-

gether with its own unique attrib-

utes. These proofs emphasize the

dilemmas facing and illogicality ofDarwinian thinking. The theory of

evolution, which maintains that

human beings are descended

from apes, needs to explain

why it is that no process simi-

lar to the imaginary transition

from ape to human was ever

undergone by any other form

of life. Evolutionists have no

answer to the question of

why, for example, a jungle catdid not one day decide to

walk upright on two legs, or

why a fox did not improve its in-

telligence level and turn into a

professor, or why a panda is una-

ble to produce admirable works of art.

Darwinism, depicted as a scientific theory, is in fact an un-

believable ideology.

JUNGLE CAT SKULL


Period: Cretaceous



65/197


66/197


64 Harun Yahya

WILD DOG SKULL

If evolutionists claims were true, then very odd-looking crea-

tures bearing characteristics of both wild dogs and of other life

forms must once have existed. These remains should be en-

countered in the fossil record, and should be immedi-

ately recognizable because they possess characteristics

belonging to two different species, and would consti-

tute an example of evolutionists imaginary descend-

ant relationships. Yet not one single intermediate

form fossil has ever appeared in geologic strata

or appeared in evolutionist publications,

even though the latter are full of innumer-able myths and imaginary scenarios.

No such fossil exists, and no such life

form ever existed at any time.

Like the 68-million-year-old wild

dog illustrated, all living things

have come down to the pres-

ent day in the same shapes

in which they were first

created. Natural history

definitively refutes theclaims of evolution.


Period: Cretaceous



67/197


Adnan Oktar 65

These small horses, which still exist today,

were also living 48 million years ago.

Present-day horses and their subspecies

were in existence, with their perfect equip-

ment and appearances, at times that

Darwinists believe that the horse was be-

ginning to evolve. But Darwinists refuse to

see this and imagine that they can continue

to mislead the public by filling textbooks

and articles about evolution with diagrams

setting out the horses fictitious evolution.

However, the scientific evidence, shows

that, as with all other living things, thehorse never underwent any evolution at all.

Age: 48 million yearsPeriod: Eocene

Location: Xi An, Shan Xi,

China

PONY SKULL


68/197


66 Harun Yahya

This mammal that lived 57

million years ago is identical to

lynxes living today. Like hun-

dreds of thousands of contem-

porary species of which fossilremains also exist, it never un-

derwent evolution at any time.

From fossils such as these, it is

not difficult to estimate the

kind of living conditions that

existed millions of years ago.

The Earth of millions of years

ago was not all that different

from the Earth of today. Apart

from a few complex life forms

that have since become extinct,

contemporary l

skulls demolish darwin 1e

Documents