skorseth - gravel road design track 1 4-18-11
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/12/2019 Skorseth - Gravel Road Design Track 1 4-18-11
1/54
2011 NACE Conference
Minneapolis, MN
byKen Skorseth
SDLTAPProgram Manager
Gravel Road Design & Maintenance
-
8/12/2019 Skorseth - Gravel Road Design Track 1 4-18-11
2/54
Critical IssuesRoadway Shape
Drainage
Surface Gravel Selection
Preservation
-
8/12/2019 Skorseth - Gravel Road Design Track 1 4-18-11
3/54
Design Issue Basic Geometrics:
Be familiar with the AASHTO publication:
Geometric Design of Very Low-Volume LocalRoads (ADT < 400)
Commonly called the Little Green Book.
-
8/12/2019 Skorseth - Gravel Road Design Track 1 4-18-11
4/54
Green Book and Little Green Book
Gravel Rds Maint & Design
-
8/12/2019 Skorseth - Gravel Road Design Track 1 4-18-11
5/54
Nearly 80% of the roads in the UShave traffic volumes of 400 vehicles
per day or less.!! (quote from Little
Green Book)
It becomes very difficult to
construct and maintain these very
low-volume roads to a high
geometric standard.
Gravel Rds Maint & Design
-
8/12/2019 Skorseth - Gravel Road Design Track 1 4-18-11
6/54
Design
speed
(km/h)
Major
access
Minor
access
Recreational &
scenic
Industrial/
commercial
access
Resource
recovery
Agricultural
Access
15 - 18.0 18.0 20.0 20.0 22.0
20 - 18.0 18.0 20.0 20.0 24.0
25 18.0 18.0 18.0 21.0 21.0 24.0
30 18.0 18.0 18.0 22.5 22.5 24.0
35 18.0 18.0 18.0 22.5 22.5 24.0
40 18.0 18.0 20.0 22.5 - 24.0
45 20.0 20.0 20.0 23.0 - 26.0
50 20.0 20.0 20.0 24.5 - -
55 22.0 - 22.0 - - -
60 22.0 - - - - -
Note: Total roadway width includes the width of both traveled way and shoulders.
Guidelines for Total Roadway Width for New Constructionof Very Low-Volume Local Roads in Rural Areas
From: AASHTO Guidelines for Geometric Design of VeryLow-Volume Local Roads (ADT
-
8/12/2019 Skorseth - Gravel Road Design Track 1 4-18-11
7/54
Design Issue Crown:
An important design issue is crown on gravel roadsurfaces. Generally recommended crown for gravel
surfaces is 4% which is double the crown used in
pavements.
-
8/12/2019 Skorseth - Gravel Road Design Track 1 4-18-11
8/54
Design Issue Crown: (cont)
Clear illustration of 2% crown on road to the left and
4% on the road to the right. Water will not drain off an
aggregate surface with only 2% crown. This must be
addressed in design and during construction.
-
8/12/2019 Skorseth - Gravel Road Design Track 1 4-18-11
9/54
Design Issue Crown: (cont)
There are conflicting views on
crown:
1/3 to 1/2 in. per ft. recommended by NACEmanual Blading Aggregate Surfaces 1986 edition.
2 to 6% for low-type pavements recommended by
AASHTO Green Book pg 387 2001 edition.
-
8/12/2019 Skorseth - Gravel Road Design Track 1 4-18-11
10/54
Design Issue Crown: (cont)
The FHWA Gravel Roads Manual
recommends crown at or near 4%.
Note: in arid and semi-arid regions,
gravel roads may perform with less
crown, but dont use less than 3%.
-
8/12/2019 Skorseth - Gravel Road Design Track 1 4-18-11
11/54
Design Issue Surface Gravel
The issue of good surface gravel
(aggregate) cannot be emphasized
enough!!
Good aggregate surfacing differs
from base and other constructionaggregates.
When its right, problems diminish!
-
8/12/2019 Skorseth - Gravel Road Design Track 1 4-18-11
12/54
Design Issue Surface Gravel
(cont)Material Specifications Discussion:
Many state DOTs do not have asurface aggregate spec.
Many specifications that do existare quite loose and do not allow
close enough control of gradation.
-
8/12/2019 Skorseth - Gravel Road Design Track 1 4-18-11
13/54
Design Issue Surface Gravel (cont)
Too often, surface aggregate isperceived as not important, hence
quality suffers.In study completed in Canada in2003 samples were taken fromseveral aggregate suppliersstockpiles being marketed assurface aggregate--- (cont next slide)
-
8/12/2019 Skorseth - Gravel Road Design Track 1 4-18-11
14/54
Design Issue Surface Gravel (cont)
Only 14% of the samples met thecompanies own specifications
when tested by independent labs!Quality control was almost
nonexistent.
Information from Material and PerformanceSpecifications for Wearing Course Aggregates on
Forest Roads by G. Legere & S. Mercier.
-
8/12/2019 Skorseth - Gravel Road Design Track 1 4-18-11
15/54
Design Issue Surface Gravel (cont)
Surface aggregate differs from base
aggregate in two fundamental ways:
The need for more plastic fines to
serve as binder.
Smaller top-sized stone that willremain embedded in the surface.
-
8/12/2019 Skorseth - Gravel Road Design Track 1 4-18-11
16/54
Design Issue Surface Gravel (cont)
Similar ADT, Similar geometrics, but different
surface materials!
-
8/12/2019 Skorseth - Gravel Road Design Track 1 4-18-11
17/54
Design Issue Surface Gravel (cont)
Corrugation orwashboarding
which is
surface distress
that is directly
related tosurface
aggregate specification.
-
8/12/2019 Skorseth - Gravel Road Design Track 1 4-18-11
18/54
-
8/12/2019 Skorseth - Gravel Road Design Track 1 4-18-11
19/54
Design Issue Surface Gravel (cont)
Sample specifications comparison:
-
8/12/2019 Skorseth - Gravel Road Design Track 1 4-18-11
20/54
Design Issue Surface Gravel (cont)
Another sample spec:WisDOT CRUSHED AGGREGATE SHOULDER COURSE
Gradation No. 3SIEVE SIZE CRUSHED GRAVEL CRUSHED STONE
1 inch 100 100
3/4 inch 95 -100 95-100
3/8 inch 50 90 50-90
No. 4 35 70 35-70
No. 10 20 55 15-55
No. 40 10 - 35 -
No. 200 9 - 15 5 - 15
-
8/12/2019 Skorseth - Gravel Road Design Track 1 4-18-11
21/54
Design Issue Stage Construction
In my experience, if a road/streetis to be maintained three years or
more as an unpaved road, use
material and crown specification forgravel roads.
If less than three years, use baseaggregate and crown specificationfor pavement. (It will be hard to
maintain in the interim).
-
8/12/2019 Skorseth - Gravel Road Design Track 1 4-18-11
22/54
Design Issue Stage Construction(cont)
Little Crown
and poor
surfaceaggregate,
but road is to
paved in three
years.
-
8/12/2019 Skorseth - Gravel Road Design Track 1 4-18-11
23/54
Prepared subgrade
Coarse aggregate
base, few fines, 6-12
inches thick
Surface layer with inch
topsize stone and good
percentage of plastic fines
minimum 3 inches thick
Not the real, but the ideal!
Design Issue Perfect Gravel Road
-
8/12/2019 Skorseth - Gravel Road Design Track 1 4-18-11
24/54
Gravel Roads Managing
Maintenance
There are two primary issues:
Managing frequency of blademaintenance.
Keeping control of shape ontraveled way and shoulder.
-
8/12/2019 Skorseth - Gravel Road Design Track 1 4-18-11
25/54
Crown
One of the biggest challenges in gravel road
maintenance.
-
8/12/2019 Skorseth - Gravel Road Design Track 1 4-18-11
26/54
-
8/12/2019 Skorseth - Gravel Road Design Track 1 4-18-11
27/54
Some roads have too little crown, some have
too much.
-
8/12/2019 Skorseth - Gravel Road Design Track 1 4-18-11
28/54
Imagine a cattle trailer on this road.
-
8/12/2019 Skorseth - Gravel Road Design Track 1 4-18-11
29/54
The road has 13 inches of crown on a 20 top
-
8/12/2019 Skorseth - Gravel Road Design Track 1 4-18-11
30/54
Two Track oad
-
8/12/2019 Skorseth - Gravel Road Design Track 1 4-18-11
31/54
Crown Gauge is Helpful
-
8/12/2019 Skorseth - Gravel Road Design Track 1 4-18-11
32/54
-
8/12/2019 Skorseth - Gravel Road Design Track 1 4-18-11
33/54
-
8/12/2019 Skorseth - Gravel Road Design Track 1 4-18-11
34/54
-
8/12/2019 Skorseth - Gravel Road Design Track 1 4-18-11
35/54
-
8/12/2019 Skorseth - Gravel Road Design Track 1 4-18-11
36/54
Manageable Road Width
-
8/12/2019 Skorseth - Gravel Road Design Track 1 4-18-11
37/54
-
8/12/2019 Skorseth - Gravel Road Design Track 1 4-18-11
38/54
Crown should be near inch per ft (or 4%)
Example: 24 ft roadway should have approx. 6
inches of crown.
-
8/12/2019 Skorseth - Gravel Road Design Track 1 4-18-11
39/54
The Next Challenge High Shoulders
-
8/12/2019 Skorseth - Gravel Road Design Track 1 4-18-11
40/54
-
8/12/2019 Skorseth - Gravel Road Design Track 1 4-18-11
41/54
Outstanding example
-
8/12/2019 Skorseth - Gravel Road Design Track 1 4-18-11
42/54
Shouldering
Operations
-
8/12/2019 Skorseth - Gravel Road Design Track 1 4-18-11
43/54
Similar ADT, Similar roadway shape, but
different surface materials!
Dramatic Contrast
-
8/12/2019 Skorseth - Gravel Road Design Track 1 4-18-11
44/54
-
8/12/2019 Skorseth - Gravel Road Design Track 1 4-18-11
45/54
-
8/12/2019 Skorseth - Gravel Road Design Track 1 4-18-11
46/54
-
8/12/2019 Skorseth - Gravel Road Design Track 1 4-18-11
47/54
Six years of performance
-
8/12/2019 Skorseth - Gravel Road Design Track 1 4-18-11
48/54
A Remarkable ContrastA Chloride Stabilized Road Since 1994!
-
8/12/2019 Skorseth - Gravel Road Design Track 1 4-18-11
49/54
Without Adequate Funds for BaseImprovement and Paving StabilizedGravel is an Alternative.
-
8/12/2019 Skorseth - Gravel Road Design Track 1 4-18-11
50/54
-
8/12/2019 Skorseth - Gravel Road Design Track 1 4-18-11
51/54
Heavy Residential Traffic & ContinuedDevelopment
-
8/12/2019 Skorseth - Gravel Road Design Track 1 4-18-11
52/54
-
8/12/2019 Skorseth - Gravel Road Design Track 1 4-18-11
53/54
-
8/12/2019 Skorseth - Gravel Road Design Track 1 4-18-11
54/54
Get ready to face the challenges ofmaintaining gravel roads in thefuture
Thanks!