LEARNING GENERATORS: NEUROLINGUISTIC PROGRAMMING AND LEARNING STYLES IN ENGLISH TEXTBOOKS

Dr EVA ZANUY LEARNING GENERATORS: ESCOLES BETLEM ENGLISH TEACHING BARCELONA AND LEARNING INNOVATION SPAIN THROUGH COMPUTER EDUCATION

PROBLEM: diversity inlearning and teachers lack of knowledge

QUESTION: do English textbooks take this diversityinto consideration?

GOAL: optimize teachingwith a learning generator SITUATION

GOALSAnalyze Neurolinguistic Programming and Learning Styles in students2. Analyze Neurolinguistic Programming and Learning Styles in textbooks3. Improve the quality of textbooks through modification

LEARNINGNLP

VISUAL: store information in any order and quicklyAUDITORY : store informationa in an ordered wayKINESTHETIC : store information in sensations and movementsLS

ACTIVIST: learn better with immediate resultsREFLECTOR: learn better analysing informationTHEORIST : learn better summarizing PRAGMATIST : learn better with useful activities

DATA ANALYSIS: Neurolinguistic Programming Students percentage

Visual 40 % Auditory 30 % Kinesthetic 30 % Editorials percentage

Visual 35 % Auditory 33 % Kinesthetic 32 %

DATA ANALYSIS:Learning Styles Students percentage

Activist 33 % Reflector 13 % Theorist 25 % Pragmatist 29 % Editorials percentage

Activist 19 % Reflector 49 % Theorist 18 % Pragmatist 14 %

Style of education adapted to each students way of learningEliminate the teaching style of each teacherComplementary activitiesDeductive rules so as to balance deduction and induction

E-BOOKS AS LEARNING GENERATORS

CONTRIBUTIONS TEACHING ENGLISH: Natural Method changes - intercomunication GENERAL EDUCATION: optimum tool - maximum learning WHOLE WORLD: generalized improvement - advanced society

LEARNING GENERATORSDr. Mrs. Eva Zanuy