shroff v shroff: bombay hc

3
Bombay High Court .. 1 ..  6-nmsl-2559.2014.sxw hvn                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY   ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION (L) NO. 2559 OF 2014 IN SUIT (L) NO. 1072 OF 2014 Shardul Suresh Shroff … Applicant In the matter between : Shardul Suresh Shroff …  Plaintiff Versus Cyril Suresh Shroff and Ors. …  Defendants Mr. P.C. Chidambaram, Sr. Advocate along with Mr. Soli Cooper, Sr. Advocate with Mr. F. D'Vitre, Sr. Advocate with Mr. M.P. Bharucha  with  Mr. Jehangir Jeejeebhoy with Ms. Nandini Singh and  Mr. Pruthviraj N.K. i/b M/s. Bharucha & Partners for the plaintiffs. Mr. Iqbal Chagla, Sr. Advocate along with Mr. Tushar Cooper with Mr. Gautam Ankhad with Mr. Rohan Dakshini with Ms. Rajashree Ram and  Ms. Nikita Mishra i/by M/s. Federal & Rashmikant for defendant nos. 1 and 2. Mr. D.J. Khambatta, Sr. Advocate along with Mr. Aditya Mehta with Mr. B. Desai with Mr. Verghese Thomas with Ms. Shanaya Irani and Ms. Aditi Deshpande i/by  M/s. J. Sagar & Associates for defendant nos.  4 and 5. Dr. Birendra Saraf along with Mr. Nirav Shah with Ms. Hemangi Abhyankar i/by M/s. DSK Legal for  defendant no. 3.           CORAM :  R.D.DHANUKA  J.           DATED  :  NOVEMBER 18, 2014 P.C. Learned senior counsel for all the parties on instruction state that ::: Downloaded on - 18/11/2014 20:36:49 :::

Upload: legallyindia

Post on 21-Nov-2015

4.467 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

After agreeing to mediation following today’s no-holds barred spilling of alleged family secrets from P Chidambaram appearing for Shardul Shroff, senior counsel Iqbal Chagla told the Bombay high court in his closing remarks that his client Cyril Shroff would be filing an affidavit showing the “deep involvement” of his brother in the will.

TRANSCRIPT

  • Bomb

    ay H

    igh C

    ourt

    ..1.. 6nmsl2559.2014.sxw

    hvn

    INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJUDICATUREATBOMBAY

    ORDINARYORIGINALCIVILJURISDICTION

    NOTICEOFMOTION(L)NO.2559OF2014IN

    SUIT(L)NO.1072OF2014

    ShardulSureshShroff Applicant

    Inthematterbetween:

    ShardulSureshShroff Plaintiff

    Versus

    CyrilSureshShroffandOrs. Defendants

    Mr.P.C.Chidambaram,Sr.AdvocatealongwithMr.SoliCooper,Sr.AdvocatewithMr.F.D'Vitre,Sr.AdvocatewithMr.M.P.BharuchawithMr.JehangirJeejeebhoy with Ms. Nandini Singh and Mr. Pruthviraj N.K. i/b M/s.Bharucha&Partnersfortheplaintiffs.

    Mr. Iqbal Chagla, Sr. Advocate along with Mr. Tushar Cooper with Mr.GautamAnkhadwithMr.RohanDakshiniwithMs.RajashreeRamandMs.NikitaMishrai/byM/s.Federal&Rashmikantfordefendantnos.1and2.

    Mr.D.J.Khambatta,Sr.AdvocatealongwithMr.AdityaMehtawithMr.B.Desai with Mr. Verghese Thomas with Ms. Shanaya Irani and Ms. AditiDeshpandei/byM/s.J.Sagar&Associatesfordefendantnos.4and5.

    Dr.BirendraSarafalongwithMr.NiravShahwithMs.HemangiAbhyankari/byM/s.DSKLegalfordefendantno.3.

    CORAM:R.D.DHANUKAJ.DATED:NOVEMBER18,2014

    P.C.

    Learnedseniorcounselforallthepartiesoninstructionstatethat

    ::: Downloaded on - 18/11/2014 20:36:49 :::

  • Bomb

    ay H

    igh C

    ourt

    ..2.. 6nmsl2559.2014.sxw

    theirclientshavenoobjectionifthismatterisheardbythiscourt.Statement

    isaccepted.

    2. Partieshavearrivedatthefollowinginterimarrangementtillthe

    matterisfurtherheard.

    (a) Plaintiffanddefendantno.1 onbehalfofthemselvesandtheir

    respectivefamiliesagreetoatimeboundmediationinrespectofthesubject

    matterofthesuitincludingFamilyFrameworkAgreementandforresolving

    mattersconcerningtwopartnershipfirmsandacompany describedinthe

    plaintinallrespects.

    (b) TheaforesaidpartieshaveagreedthatMr.NimeshKampanishall

    beoneofthemediator.PlaintiffhasnominatedShriJusticeB.N.Srikrishna,

    formerJudgeoftheSupremeCourtasoneofthemediator.Defendantno.1

    has nominated Shri. Harish Salve, Senior Advocate as Mediator. All the

    partieshaveagreedthatallthethreemediatorsshallactjointlyandwouldbe

    atlibertytotakeassistanceofanyadvisorsorexpertsastheydeemfit.

    (c) Parties haveagreedtocooperatewiththelearnedMediatorsand

    haveagreedtomakeendeavourtoresolvethematterexpeditiouslywithina

    timeframeof31stDecember,2014andexpandablebymutualconsent.

    (d) Theinterimarrangementarrivedatbetweenthepartiesiswithout

    prejudicetotherightsandcontentionsofboththeparties.

    3. Defendantsaredirectedtofileaffidavit inreplywithin three

    ::: Downloaded on - 18/11/2014 20:36:49 :::

  • Bomb

    ay H

    igh C

    ourt

    ..3.. 6nmsl2559.2014.sxw

    weeksfromtoday.Itisagreedbythepartiesthatifanyaffidavitinreplyis

    filed,thesamealsocanbeconsideredbythelearnedmediators. Placethe

    matteronboardunderthecaptionofadinterimreliefon19thJanuary,2015.

    (R.D.DHANUKA,J.)

    ::: Downloaded on - 18/11/2014 20:36:49 :::