sharks of the open ocean || case study: white shark movements in the north pacific pelagic ecosystem

5
Chapter 6 Case Study: White Shark Movements in the North Pacific Pelagic Ecosystem Andre M. Boustany, Kevin C. M. Weng, Scot D. Anderson, Peter Pyle and Barbara A. Block Abstract The advent of novel electronic tracking technologies has allowed researchers to study the movements of ocean animals in their natural environment. Pop-up tagging of adult white sharks off the coast of central California provided insight into the movement patterns and environmental preferences of these sharks in the North Pacific Ocean. Tagged white sharks spent long periods, up to 8 months, in the pelagic ecosystem and far from land. While offshore, sharks experienced a wide range of depths and temperatures. The purpose of these offshore excursions remains unknown, but further tagging over wider size ranges and geographic areas should help to address these questions. Key words: white shark, Carcharodon carcharias, satellite tagging, Lamnidae, pelagic shark movement, North Pacific. Introduction White sharks (Carcharodon carcharias, Lamnidae) are large apex predators with the capability to conserve metabolic heat and maintain body temperatures warmer than ambi- ent (Carey et al., 1971, 1982; Goldman et al., 1996; Goldman, 1997). They are found in all major ocean basins, from temperate to tropical seas, although most visual identifi- cations have been from temperate waters (Compagno, 2001). Traditionally, white sharks were considered primarily coastal in nature, aggregating around pinniped colonies to feed (Klimley, 1985; Long et al., 1996). Yet occasional sightings of white sharks far from land (Compagno, 2001), their occurrence at oceanic islands (Taylor, 1985), and genetic stud- ies suggesting movement between continents (Pardini et al., 2001) indicate that they are capable of making long-distance, open ocean migrations. However, it has been difficult to study white sharks within and across the entire pelagic ecosystem. Recent advances in satellite telemetry have overcome this limitation by allowing researchers to track pelagic fishes far from land, independent of research vessels (Block et al., 1998). Sharks of the Open Ocean: Biology, Fisheries and Conservation. Edited by M. D. Camhi, E. K. Pikitch and E. A. Babcock © 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd. ISBN: 978-0632-05995-9

Upload: elizabeth-a

Post on 23-Dec-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Chapter 6

Case Study: White Shark Movements in the North Pacifi c Pelagic Ecosystem

Andre M. Boustany, Kevin C. M. Weng, Scot D. Anderson, Peter Pyle and Barbara A. Block

Abstract

The advent of novel electronic tracking technologies has allowed researchers to study the movements of ocean animals in their natural environment. Pop-up tagging of adult white sharks off the coast of central California provided insight into the movement patterns and environmental preferences of these sharks in the North Pacifi c Ocean. Tagged white sharks spent long periods, up to 8 months, in the pelagic ecosystem and far from land. While offshore, sharks experienced a wide range of depths and temperatures. The purpose of these offshore excursions remains unknown, but further tagging over wider size ranges and geographic areas should help to address these questions.

Key words: white shark, Carcharodon carcharias, satellite tagging, Lamnidae, pelagic shark movement, North Pacifi c.

Introduction

White sharks (Carcharodon carcharias, Lamnidae) are large apex predators with the capability to conserve metabolic heat and maintain body temperatures warmer than ambi-ent (Carey et al., 1971, 1982; Goldman et al., 1996; Goldman, 1997). They are found in all major ocean basins, from temperate to tropical seas, although most visual identifi -cations have been from temperate waters (Compagno, 2001). Traditionally, white sharks were considered primarily coastal in nature, aggregating around pinniped colonies to feed (Klimley, 1985; Long et al., 1996). Yet occasional sightings of white sharks far from land (Compagno, 2001), their occurrence at oceanic islands (Taylor, 1985), and genetic stud-ies suggesting movement between continents (Pardini et al., 2001) indicate that they are capable of making long-distance, open ocean migrations. However, it has been diffi cult to study white sharks within and across the entire pelagic ecosystem. Recent advances in satellite telemetry have overcome this limitation by allowing researchers to track pelagic fi shes far from land, independent of research vessels (Block et al., 1998).

Sharks of the Open Ocean: Biology, Fisheries and Conservation. Edited by M. D. Camhi, E. K. Pikitch and E. A. Babcock

© 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd. ISBN: 978-0632-05995-9

White Shark Movements in the North Pacifi c 83

One of the newest electronic tagging technologies is the pop-up satellite archival tag (PSAT; Block et al., 1998; Marcinek et al., 2001). These tags are attached externally to marine animals, where they collect pressure, ambient temperature, and light-level data at user-defi ned intervals. At a preprogrammed date, the tags release from the fi sh, fl oat to the surface, and transmit summaries of stored data to researchers through the Argos satellite system. Light-level data in conjunction with tag-recorded sea surface temperatures (SST) can be used to estimate longitude and latitude (Wilson et al., 1992; Teo et al., 2004).

Methods and Results

Between 1999 and 2003, 25 adult (3.7–5.3 m) white sharks were tagged with PSATs at Southeast Farallon Island (SEFI), off the central coast of California (Boustany et al., 2002). White sharks are present at SEFI in the fall and early winter but are absent at other times of the year (Ainley et al., 1985). Males return to the island yearly, but females are believed to return on alternate years (Anderson and Pyle, 2003), suggesting a biennial breeding period. It is currently unknown where breeding or pupping takes place in the North Pacifi c. To examine the horizontal and vertical movement patterns of white sharks when not at SEFI, PSATs were applied to the dorsal musculature of the sharks for periods ranging from 14 to 274 days. To date, 12 tags have successfully reported data through the satellites.

Tagged sharks remained in the vicinity of SEFI for periods ranging from 0.5 to 4 months after tagging. Previous acoustic studies have indicated that white sharks are actively search-ing for prey at this time (Goldman et al., 1996; Goldman and Anderson, 1999; Klimley et al., 2001). While in this area, temperature ranges were narrow (8–14ºC) and diving was shallow as sharks were restricted by the continental shelf. Sharks spent the major-ity of time (�95%) between the surface and 50 m depth. In the late fall and early winter, sharks moved offshore toward the southwest, taking them into the warmer temperatures of the eastern Pacifi c’s subtropical gyre (Fig. 6.1). The earliest movements off the con-tinental shelf took place in late November, whereas other sharks remained near the tag-ging location until early March. As the white sharks moved offshore, diving increased with maximum dive depths extending below 700 m. Deeper diving, coupled with move-ment into subtropical waters, expanded the temperature range that sharks experienced (4.6–26.2ºC). One male shark showed movement to the Hawaiian Islands in 2 consecu-tive years, remaining in the area for at least 4 months before returning to SEFI (Boustany et al., 2002). Reports of white shark predation on cetaceans near the Hawaiian Islands and the timing of the shark’s arrival with the humpback whale calving season suggest that movement to that area may be for feeding (J. Naughton, National Marine Fisheries Service, personal communication).

All other white sharks that were tracked for longer than 1 month moved toward a region of the subtropical eastern Pacifi c midway between Baja California and the Hawaiian Islands (Fig. 6.1). This region is characterized by a lack of seamounts, strong temperature gradients, or prominent currents, raising the question of why white sharks are attracted to this area. These sharks remained in this area for up to 8 months with no observed movement back to California coastal areas, suggesting that the period of

84 Sharks of the Open Ocean

pelagic residency may be a signifi cant portion of their yearly cycle. Depths recorded by the tags indicate that sharks were routinely making deep dives (�300 m) while in this region. The fact that subadult white sharks tracked off the coasts of California, Australia, and South Africa have not shown extensive periods of pelagic residency (K. C. M. Weng et al., unpublished data; Bonfi l et al., 2005; Bruce, 2008) suggests that these movements may be related to breeding in adult sharks. Although young-of-the-year white sharks are found predominantly in southern California waters (Klimley, 1985; Dewar et al., 2004), it remains possible that these small sharks may have traveled to coastal areas from else-where. However, the possibility of an offshore pupping ground does not explain the movement of males into pelagic waters. Because current hypotheses regarding duration of gestation suggest an 18-month time period, it seems unlikely that mating and pupping would occur over the same period (Mollet et al., 2000), and it is thus possible that sharks travel to this offshore area to mate (Anderson and Pyle, 2003).

Electronic tags have revealed new insights into the pelagic behaviors of white sharks. It remains uncertain whether white sharks of differing size classes and from other geo-graphic areas exhibit similar movement patterns as these adult white sharks tracked in the eastern North Pacifi c. Ongoing tagging of both adolescent sharks in the eastern Pacifi c as well as adult sharks off Australia and South Africa should help to discern the infl uences of tagging location and ontogenetic shifts in behavior on the pelagic residency of white sharks. Such data will improve our understanding of white shark movements and will be critical to establishing protective measures to conserve these populations worldwide.

160ºW 150ºW 140ºW 130ºW 120ºW 110ºW

20ºN

30ºN

40ºN

Fig. 6.1 Release location (black triangle) and pop-up locations of male (white circles) and female (gray circles) white sharks tagged between 1999 and 2003.

White Shark Movements in the North Pacifi c 85

References

Ainley, D. G., Henderson, R. P., Huber, H. R., Boekelheide, R. J., Allen, S. G. and McElroy, T. L. (1985) Dynamics of white shark/pinniped interactions in the Gulf of the Farallones. Memoirs of the Southern California Academy of Sciences 9, 109–122.

Anderson, S. D. and Pyle, P. (2003) A temporal, sex specifi c occurrence pattern among white sharks at the South Farallon Islands, California. California Fish and Game 89(2), 96–101.

Block, B. A., Dewar, H., Farwell, C. and Prince, E. D. (1998) A new satellite technology for track-ing the movements of Atlantic bluefi n tuna. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 95(16), 9384–9389.

Bonfi l, R., Meyer, M., Scholl, M. C., Johnson, R., O’Brien, S., Oosthuizen, H., Swanson, S., Kotze, D. and Paterson, M. (2005) Transoceanic migration, spatial dynamics, and population linkages of white sharks. Science 310, 100–103.

Boustany, A. M., Davis, S. F., Pyle, P., Anderson, S. D., Le Boeuf, B. J. and Block, B. A. (2002) Expanded niche for white sharks. Nature 415, 35–36.

Bruce, B. D. (2008) The biology and ecology of the white shark, Carcharodon carcharias. In: Sharks of the Open Ocean: Biology, Fisheries and Conservation (eds. M. D. Camhi, E. K. Pikitch and E. A. Babcock). Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK.

Carey, F. G., Teal, J. M., Kanwisher, J. W., Lawson, K. D. and Beckett, J. S. (1971) Warm bodied fi sh. American Zoologist 11, 137–145.

Carey, F. G., Kanwisher, J. W., Brazier, O., Gabrielson, G., Casey, J. G. and Pratt, H. L. (1982) Temperature and activities of a white shark, Carcharodon carcharias. Copeia 1982(2), 254–260.

Compagno, L. J. V. (2001) FAO Species Catalogue for Fishery Purposes. No. 1. Sharks of the World: An Annotated and Illustrated Catalogue of Shark Species Known to Date. Vol. 2. Bullhead, Mackerel and Carpet Sharks (Heterodontiformes, Lamniformes and Orectolobiformes). FAO, Rome, Italy, 269 pp.

Dewar, H., Domeier, M. and Nasby-Lucas, N. (2004) Insights into young of the year white shark, Carcharodon carcharias, behavior in the Southern California Bight. Environmental Biology of Fishes 70, 133–143.

Goldman, K. J. (1997). Regulation of body temperature in the white shark, Carcharodon carcharias. Journal of Comparative Physiology and Biology 167, 423–429.

Goldman, K. J. and Anderson, S. D. (1999). Space utilization and swimming depth of white sharks, Carcharodon carcharias, at the South Farallon Islands, central California. Environmental Biology of Fishes 56, 351–364.

Goldman, K. J., Anderson, S. D., McCosker, J. E. and Klimley, A. P. (1996) Temperature, swimming depth, and movements of a white shark at the South Farallon Islands, California. In: Great White Sharks: The Biology of Carcharodon carcharias (eds. A. P. Klimley and D. G. Ainley). Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 111–120.

Klimley, A. P. (1985) The areal distribution and autoecology of the white shark, Carcharodon carcharias, off the West Coast of North America. Memoirs of the Southern California Academy of Sciences 9, 15–40.

Klimley, A. P., Le Boeuf, B. J., Cantara, K. M., Richert, J. E., Davis, S. F., Van Sommeran, S. and Kelly, J. T. (2001) The hunting strategy of white sharks (Carcharodon carcharias) near a seal colony. Marine Biology 138, 617–636.

Long, D. J., Hanni, K. D., Pyle, P., Roletto, J., Jones, R. E. and Bandar, R. (1996) White shark predation on four pinniped species in central California waters: Geographic and temporal pat-terns inferred from wounded carcasses. In: Great White Sharks: The Biology of Carcharodon carcharias (eds. A. P. Klimley and D. G. Ainley). Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 263–274.

86 Sharks of the Open Ocean

Marcinek, D. J., et al. (2001) Depth and muscle temperature of Pacifi c bluefi n tuna examined with acoustic and pop-up satellite tags. Marine Biology 138, 869–885.

Mollet, H. F., Cliff, G., Pratt Jr., H. L. and Stevens, J. D. (2000) Reproductive biology of the female shortfi n mako Isurus oxyrinchus Rafi nesque, 1810, with comments on the embryonic develop-ment of lamnoids. Fishery Bulletin 98, 299–318.

Pardini, A. T., Jones, C. S., Noble, L. R., et al. (2001) Sex-biased dispersal of great white sharks. Nature 412, 139–140.

Taylor, L. (1985) White sharks in Hawaii: Historical and contemporary records. Memoirs of the Southern California Academy of Sciences 9, 41–48.

Teo, L. H. T., Boustany, A. M., Blackwell, S., Walli, A., Weng, K. C. and Block, B. A. (2004) Validation of geolocation estimates based on light level and sea surface temperature from elec-tronic tags. Marine Ecology Progress Series 283, 81–98.

Wilson, R. P., Ducamp, J. J., Rees, G. W., Culik, B. M. and Niekamp, K. (1992) Estimation of location: Global coverage using light intensity. In: Wildlife Telemetry: Remote Monitoring and Tracking of Animals (eds. I. G. Priede and S. M. Swift). Ellis Horwood, London, UK, pp. 131–134.