shared-use mobility summit highlights
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Shared-Use Mobility Summit Highlights
Workshop 137, 93rd Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting
Susan A. Shaheen, Ph.D.Adjunct Professor & Co-Director,
Transportation Sustainability Research CenterUniversity of California, Berkeley
January 12, 2014
• Definitions• Summit highlights• Key takeaways• Next steps
Overview
What is shared-use mobility?Definitions
Shared-use mobility is defined as mobility services that are shared among users including:
Traditional public transportation services, such as buses and trains;
Vanpools, carpools, shuttles, TNCs;
Carsharing, bikesharing, scooter sharing in all its forms; and
Flexible goods movement
Access trumps ownershipParadigm Shift?
The trend is clear:Access trumps possession.Access is better than- Kevin Kelly
ownership
Evolving system of services and operatorsRidesharing
Carpooling: Grouping of travelers into a privately owned vehicle, typically for commuting
Vanpooling: Commuters traveling to/from a job center sharing a ride in a van
Real-time ridesharing services: Match drivers and passengers, based on destination, through app before the trip starts
Roundtrip Carsharing: Round trip, pay by the hour/mile, non-profit and for profit fleet models
Peer-to-Peer Carsharing: Shared use of private vehicle typically managed by third party
One-Way Carsharing: Pay by the minute, point to point, fleet operated, street parking agreements
Fractional Ownership Carsharing: Individuals sublease or subscribe to a vehicle owned by a third party
There are many flavors of carsharingCarsharing
Scooter Sharing: Round trip or one way, pay by the hourSmartphone access, operator fleet
Fills the niche between cars and bicyclesScooter Sharing
Public Bikesharing: Point to point, pay by the ½ hr, fleet operated, docking stations
Closed Community Bikesharing: Campuses and closed membership, mainly roundtrip, linking to carsharing
Peer-to-Peer Bikesharing: Rent or borrow hourly or daily from individuals or bike rental shops
Growing exponentially in urban centersBikesharing
A new category of transportation services; need for study
Transportation Network Companies
Transportation Network Company: Prearranged trips, App to pay and connect passengers with drivers who use their personal vehicles
Multiple modes, little or no integrationTransportation Today
Taxi, Limousine & Transportation Network Companies
Public Transit, Rail, Bus, Ferry
Shared Mobility Services
Employer Shuttles, Jitneys, Commercial Deliveries
Regional & Intercity Services: Rail, High-Speed Rail, Air
Privately-Owned Vehicles
“The Whole Is Greater Than The Sum of Its Parts.”
-Aristotle
Customer Experience
Routing
Booking
Payments
Credits/Offsets
Games/Value add
Integration to enhance customer experienceMobility Mgmt.
13
Rapid Network Boarding Island
Integrated for customer accessShared Mobility Vision
Shared-Use Mobility Summit Highlights• October 10-11, 2013• Hilton San Francisco Financial District Hotel• ~300 attendees
– 105 companies, 62 governmental agencies, 17 universities
– 26 affiliations from carsharing, 16 from bikesharing, 6 from ridesharing/TNCs
• Dialogue among mobility providers, policymakers, public agencies, non-profits, technologists, academics, media, stakeholders, affiliated industries
Key Sessions from the Summit• Setting the Stage: Trends, Definitions, and Policies• Shared-Use Mobility Success Stories• The Sharing Economy: Scaling the Shared-Use Mobility
Marketplace• Bikesharing Mobile Workshop• Governance 2.0 (“Micro” Level): Shared-Use Policy Approaches
for City and County Governance• The Impacts of Shared-Use Mobility Services• The Future of Mobility and Transportation Policy and Planning• Fostering Multi-Modal Integration and Public Transit
Connections• Parallel Industry Breakout Sessions• Industry Policy Considerations• The Future of Shared-Use Mobility
Key Takeaways
• Government needs to act as a facilitator• Social equity demands the “push” of some of these
innovations to lower income areas and populations• Greater public subsidy needed• Integration with public transit should be a goal• Parking and insurance remain obstacles• Industry-wide standards are needed• Privacy efforts are important (individual,
company level)
Special Thanks: This Took A Village!
TSRC/ITS Berkeley/UCB: Madonna Camel, Helen Bassham, Adam Cohen, Josh Steiner, Chris Cosgrove, Phyllis Orrick, Sarah Yang, Laura Melendy
Summit Planning, Support & Advice: Dave Brook, Robert Cervero, Matthew Christensen, Adam Cohen, Melanie Crotty, Benjamin De La Pena, Rod Diridon, Sharon Feigon, Neal Gorenflo, Allen Greenberg, Guy Fraker, Karen Frick, Larry Filler, Lisa Gansky, Neal Gorenflo, Steve Gutmann, Rick Hutchinson. Donna Maurillo, Russell Meddin, Paul Minett, Jason Pavluchuk, Timothy Papandreou, Karen Philbrick, Jason Pavluchuk, Dan Sturges, John Williams, Alan Woodland, Sarah Yang, and Sue Zielinski
Numerous sponsors and partners, as well as all our volunteers!
Mobility Providers: 2013 Summit
Next Steps
Acknowledgements Helen Bassham, Madonna Camel,
Nelson Chan, Matthew Christensen, Adam Cohen, TSRC
Sharon Feigon, Alternative Transportation for Chicagoland
Jason Pavluchuk, Pavluchuk & Associates
Scott Bernstein, Center for Neighborhood Technologies
Timothy Papandreou, SFMTA Sponsors and supporters of the SF
Summit
www.tsrc.berkeley.edu