session b wrap-up summary and commentary
DESCRIPTION
Session B Wrap-up Summary and Commentary. Roman Barták Charles University (Czech Republic) [email protected] http://ktiml.mff.cuni.cz/~bartak. Summary. Three papers proposing benchmark areas Reactive scheduling Over-subscribed scheduling Real-life scheduling - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Session B Wrap-upSummary and Commentary
Roman BartákRoman BartákCharles University (Czech Republic)Charles University (Czech Republic)
[email protected]://ktiml.mff.cuni.cz/~bartak
SSC 2007, Roman Barták 2
SummarySummary
Three papers proposing benchmark areasReactive schedulingOver-subscribed schedulingReal-life scheduling
Wrap-up paper on benchmarks Two papers describing experience
with other competitions International Timetabling Competition International Planning Competition
SSC 2007, Roman Barták 3
Other competitionsOther competitions We should learn from others. We are completely different.
Why should one run a (scheduling) competition? compare the systems or algorithms? bridging the gap between theory and practice? advance the research? drive the research? promote the research? just to play? …
SSC 2007, Roman Barták 4
BenchmarksBenchmarks real-life motivated vs. academic problems going beyond classical scheduling
dynamic aspects over-subscribed different objectives (robustness,…)
common representation language for covering „all“ scheduling problems
generating problem instances vs. real-life data parameters to vary problem hardness or to vary problem
type evaluation criteria
is runtime so bad? conclusions from the competition
any winner?