september 2015 water conservation report by supplier (by hydro … · 2015-10-30 · september 2015...
TRANSCRIPT
September 2015 Water Conservation Report by Supplier (by hydro region, then R-GPCD)
389 suppliers reporting for September
Conservation
Standard
Cumulative
Percent Saved (as compared
to 2013)
Monthly
Percent Saved(as compared
to Sep-13)
Estimated
Monthly
R-GPCD
Total
Population
Served
Santa Cruz City of Central Coast 8% 29.4% 25.2% 41.3 95,224
California Water Service Company King City Central Coast 12% 20.5% 16.1% 51.1 14,999
Goleta Water District Central Coast 12% 28.6% 28.0% 52.8 86,946
Soquel Creek Water District Central Coast 8% 31.3% 26.5% 58.9 39,043
San Luis Obispo City of Central Coast 12% 22.6% 19.2% 60.2 45,802
Morro Bay City of Central Coast 12% 18.2% 17.1% 60.7 10,234
Lompoc City of Central Coast 12% 24.6% 13.5% 64.3 41,541
California Water Service Company Salinas District Central Coast 16% 27.3% 23.2% 66.0 121,530
Marina Coast Water District Central Coast 12% 32.9% 31.9% 68.2 32,375
California-American Water Company Monterey District Central Coast 8% 16.4% 13.2% 70.3 100,623
Santa Barbara City of Central Coast 12% 36.8% 34.8% 72.0 93,091
Watsonville City of Central Coast 20% 23.5% 20.1% 74.1 65,739
Scotts Valley Water District Central Coast 16% 28.7% 26.4% 75.8 10,309
Carpinteria Valley Water District Central Coast 20% 34.1% 34.9% 81.5 14,616
Hollister City of Central Coast 20% 26.4% 27.6% 84.4 20,515
Gilroy City of Central Coast 24% 32.3% 27.8% 90.9 53,306
Santa Maria City of Central Coast 16% 17.6% 14.8% 92.9 102,087
Sunnyslope County Water District Central Coast 28% 36.2% 34.9% 95.7 19,189
Pismo Beach City of Central Coast 24% 24.9% 19.6% 98.7 7,861
Arroyo Grande City of Central Coast 28% 35.6% 31.9% 99.9 17,121
Soledad, City of Central Coast 24% 19.5% 13.4% 102.5 16,729
Morgan Hill City of Central Coast 28% 36.9% 35.8% 103.6 41,779
Alco Water Service Central Coast 24% 23.4% 28.5% 104.7 29,179
Paso Robles City of Central Coast 28% 33.0% 29.5% 114.3 30,450
Atascadero Mutual Water Company Central Coast 28% 32.9% 26.9% 123.3 31,432
Nipomo Community Services District Central Coast 28% 33.0% 28.0% 136.9 12,512
Golden State Water Company Orcutt Central Coast 32% 39.7% 37.2% 137.8 31,872
Montecito Water District Central Coast 32% 47.0% 48.3% 211.9 13,500
Coachella City of Colorado River 24% 20.0% 17.9% 97.2 43,917
Supplier Name Hydrologic Region
Cumulative Savings
(June 2015 - September 2015)*Monthly Savings (September 2015)
* Cumulative savings is used to assess supplier compliance with mandatory 25 percent statewide conservation.
Data pulled 16 October 2015 Page 1 of 14
September 2015 Water Conservation Report by Supplier (by hydro region, then R-GPCD)
389 suppliers reporting for September
Conservation
Standard
Cumulative
Percent Saved (as compared
to 2013)
Monthly
Percent Saved(as compared
to Sep-13)
Estimated
Monthly
R-GPCD
Total
Population
Served
Supplier Name Hydrologic Region
Cumulative Savings
(June 2015 - September 2015)*Monthly Savings (September 2015)
Calexico City of Colorado River 20% 13.7% -9.3% 101.8 41,033
Twentynine Palms Water District Colorado River 28% 16.0% 13.2% 104.4 18,795
Joshua Basin Water District Colorado River 28% 26.2% 19.2% 110.1 9,514
El Centro City of Colorado River 24% 16.0% 4.9% 114.5 44,311
Imperial, City of Colorado River 24% 15.4% 7.1% 114.7 18,022
Banning City of Colorado River 32% 31.4% 28.4% 120.7 30,325
Mission Springs Water District Colorado River 28% 18.8% 19.2% 123.4 37,600
Blythe City of Colorado River 32% 13.2% 6.4% 132.7 13,839
Indio City of Colorado River 32% 21.6% 12.0% 143.2 88,411
Brawley City of Colorado River 32% 35.8% 33.4% 150.0 27,743
Desert Water Agency Colorado River 36% 30.8% 23.9% 164.6 120,573
Myoma Dunes Mutual Water Company Colorado River 36% 31.2% 22.9% 261.6 8,948
Coachella Valley Water District Colorado River 36% 27.1% 16.4% 300.9 213,802
Arcata City of North Coast 4% 1.6% 3.2% 55.2 18,464
Eureka City of North Coast 4% 13.0% 11.6% 59.9 27,052
Crescent City City of North Coast 16% 17.3% 19.1% 60.7 18,290
McKinleyville Community Service District North Coast 4% 18.1% 8.8% 64.9 16,900
Humboldt Community Service District North Coast 24% 11.6% 12.8% 66.1 20,032
Sweetwater Springs Water District North Coast 16% 27.7% 27.4% 66.4 7,751
Rohnert Park City of North Coast 16% 17.9% 13.4% 72.2 43,398
Santa Rosa City of North Coast 16% 26.7% 22.6% 72.3 170,974
Fortuna City of North Coast 24% 22.0% 20.6% 77.7 12,032
Windsor, Town of North Coast 16% 25.4% 23.8% 79.0 27,486
California Water Service Company Redwood Valley North Coast 16% 35.9% 25.9% 81.9 3,198
Healdsburg City of North Coast 24% 28.6% 30.8% 102.9 11,687
Humboldt Bay Municipal Water District North Coast 4% -5.5% -2.7% 104.2 602
Yreka, City of North Coast 32% 17.9% 6.5% 124.6 7,840
South Tahoe Public Utilities District North Lahontan 20% 22.6% 15.8% 85.3 33,124
Truckee-Donner Public Utilities District North Lahontan 28% 31.4% 18.3% 107.5 32,776
* Cumulative savings is used to assess supplier compliance with mandatory 25 percent statewide conservation.
Data pulled 16 October 2015 Page 2 of 14
September 2015 Water Conservation Report by Supplier (by hydro region, then R-GPCD)
389 suppliers reporting for September
Conservation
Standard
Cumulative
Percent Saved (as compared
to 2013)
Monthly
Percent Saved(as compared
to Sep-13)
Estimated
Monthly
R-GPCD
Total
Population
Served
Supplier Name Hydrologic Region
Cumulative Savings
(June 2015 - September 2015)*Monthly Savings (September 2015)
Tahoe City Public Utilities District North Lahontan 20% 35.1% 27.5% 120.7 8,347
North Tahoe Public Utility District North Lahontan 28% 27.7% 24.5% 125.4 7,500
Susanville City of North Lahontan 36% 20.5% 1.2% 231.6 8,978
California Water Service Company Oroville Sacramento River 28% 28.2% 20.6% 74.1 10,777
Del Oro Water Company Sacramento River 24% 44.5% 45.1% 84.7 9,615
California Water Service Company Dixon, City of Sacramento River 28% 33.3% 28.4% 100.1 9,984
California-American Water Company Sacramento District Sacramento River 20% 38.1% 30.2% 100.4 201,418
California Water Service Company Marysville Sacramento River 24% 29.8% 23.0% 102.9 12,222
Woodland City of Sacramento River 24% 34.5% 29.2% 103.8 57,223
West Sacramento City of Sacramento River 28% 38.0% 30.4% 109.1 50,836
Elk Grove Water Service Sacramento River 28% 37.4% 31.0% 111.9 44,255
Fairfield City of Sacramento River 20% 25.3% 19.8% 112.5 107,540
Davis City of Sacramento River 28% 28.1% 18.2% 113.7 68,315
Sacramento City of Sacramento River 28% 32.5% 26.5% 114.9 480,155
California Water Service Company Willows Sacramento River 28% 34.4% 27.8% 115.0 7,130
Roseville City of Sacramento River 28% 36.8% 30.4% 118.4 122,946
Sacramento County Water Agency Sacramento River 32% 38.5% 33.1% 124.9 173,848
Sacramento Suburban Water District Sacramento River 32% 34.9% 32.7% 126.7 174,847
Shasta Lake City of Sacramento River 28% 36.9% 35.4% 129.7 10,293
Yuba City City of Sacramento River 32% 30.6% 26.8% 130.3 68,379
Fruitridge Vista Water Company Sacramento River 36% 38.9% 41.9% 132.3 21,441
California Water Service Company Chico District Sacramento River 32% 41.5% 35.9% 140.4 102,947
Olivehurst Public Utility District Sacramento River 36% 44.6% 54.9% 141.7 19,509
Vacaville City of Sacramento River 32% 35.9% 31.7% 142.1 86,893
Linda County Water District Sacramento River 32% 36.2% 27.5% 143.4 18,808
Red Bluff City of Sacramento River 36% 32.1% 29.1% 146.4 14,076
Georgetown Divide Public Utilities District Sacramento River 32% 33.2% 17.4% 150.8 9,864
Lincoln City of Sacramento River 32% 34.8% 26.4% 152.9 45,837
Placer County Water Agency Sacramento River 32% 31.9% 26.0% 161.9 95,717
* Cumulative savings is used to assess supplier compliance with mandatory 25 percent statewide conservation.
Data pulled 16 October 2015 Page 3 of 14
September 2015 Water Conservation Report by Supplier (by hydro region, then R-GPCD)
389 suppliers reporting for September
Conservation
Standard
Cumulative
Percent Saved (as compared
to 2013)
Monthly
Percent Saved(as compared
to Sep-13)
Estimated
Monthly
R-GPCD
Total
Population
Served
Supplier Name Hydrologic Region
Cumulative Savings
(June 2015 - September 2015)*Monthly Savings (September 2015)
Citrus Heights Water District Sacramento River 32% 38.3% 29.1% 164.0 67,333
Galt City of Sacramento River 32% 35.2% 30.2% 168.0 24,289
Golden State Water Company Cordova Sacramento River 36% 36.2% 29.1% 175.6 43,767
Paradise Irrigation District Sacramento River 36% 43.0% 31.4% 175.9 26,032
Nevada Irrigation District Sacramento River 36% 32.9% 18.5% 183.6 44,761
Rio Vista, city of Sacramento River 36% 31.5% 22.5% 186.0 8,324
Folsom City of Sacramento River 32% 30.2% 21.3% 186.4 63,376
Redding City of Sacramento River 36% 30.0% 23.9% 187.0 91,207
Rio Linda - Elverta Community Water District Sacramento River 36% 35.9% 24.4% 199.4 11,013
Carmichael Water District Sacramento River 36% 34.8% 25.5% 205.6 38,354
Fair Oaks Water District Sacramento River 36% 36.2% 25.2% 213.7 36,226
El Dorado Irrigation District Sacramento River 28% 29.5% 19.4% 223.8 118,500
Orange Vale Water Company Sacramento River 36% 37.8% 27.2% 242.0 14,283
Bella Vista Water District Sacramento River 36% 54.5% 51.4% 281.3 17,619
San Juan Water District Sacramento River 36% 38.8% 29.9% 310.0 32,779
North Coast County Water District San Francisco Bay 8% 32.3% 30.9% 38.1 39,000
California Water Service Company South San Francisco San Francisco Bay 8% 22.8% 19.2% 40.6 61,590
San Francisco Public Utilities Commission San Francisco Bay 8% 15.6% 13.2% 42.8 846,601
Hayward City of San Francisco Bay 8% 26.7% 3.4% 42.9 152,889
Coastside County Water District San Francisco Bay 8% 20.5% 10.6% 44.9 16,668
East Palo Alto, City of San Francisco Bay 8% 25.4% 36.8% 46.7 29,143
Westborough Water District San Francisco Bay 8% 24.8% 29.6% 47.0 14,050
Golden State Water Company Bay Point San Francisco Bay 12% 28.9% 24.5% 56.7 22,258
Milpitas City of San Francisco Bay 12% 26.3% 24.5% 57.8 70,817
Daly City City of San Francisco Bay 8% 10.1% 0.1% 57.8 105,810
Estero Municipal Improvement District San Francisco Bay 12% 17.3% 13.1% 61.6 37,165
Mountain View City of San Francisco Bay 16% 32.8% 25.0% 62.6 76,210
Burlingame City of San Francisco Bay 16% 32.9% 29.8% 64.2 30,282
Redwood City City of San Francisco Bay 8% 29.1% 16.5% 64.6 87,696
* Cumulative savings is used to assess supplier compliance with mandatory 25 percent statewide conservation.
Data pulled 16 October 2015 Page 4 of 14
September 2015 Water Conservation Report by Supplier (by hydro region, then R-GPCD)
389 suppliers reporting for September
Conservation
Standard
Cumulative
Percent Saved (as compared
to 2013)
Monthly
Percent Saved(as compared
to Sep-13)
Estimated
Monthly
R-GPCD
Total
Population
Served
Supplier Name Hydrologic Region
Cumulative Savings
(June 2015 - September 2015)*Monthly Savings (September 2015)
Sunnyvale City of San Francisco Bay 16% 33.6% 24.5% 65.7 148,028
California Water Service Company Mid Peninsula San Francisco Bay 16% 28.4% 27.6% 66.3 134,929
Dublin San Ramon Services District San Francisco Bay 12% 42.4% 39.6% 67.4 79,593
Great Oaks Water Company Incorporated San Francisco Bay 20% 35.2% 33.0% 71.6 99,199
Vallejo City of San Francisco Bay 16% 23.3% 18.2% 71.7 124,000
Menlo Park City of San Francisco Bay 16% 49.7% 55.7% 71.8 16,066
Millbrae City of San Francisco Bay 16% 28.3% 30.3% 72.4 21,532
American Canyon, City of San Francisco Bay 20% 26.5% 24.2% 72.9 20,080
East Bay Municipal Utilities District San Francisco Bay 16% 27.9% 22.5% 74.0 1,390,000
Alameda County Water District San Francisco Bay 16% 33.4% 26.9% 74.1 346,000
Santa Clara City of San Francisco Bay 16% 23.8% 10.9% 74.2 120,973
San Jose Water Company San Francisco Bay 20% 35.1% 30.8% 76.2 990,000
Petaluma City of San Francisco Bay 16% 26.5% 22.2% 78.8 61,258
Suisun-Solano Water Authority San Francisco Bay 28% 28.2% 29.1% 80.4 28,549
Pittsburg City of San Francisco Bay 20% 24.6% 20.4% 83.4 66,183
Mid-Peninsula Water District San Francisco Bay 20% 30.6% 27.5% 83.6 26,730
San Jose City of San Francisco Bay 20% 32.2% 24.7% 85.0 117,576
Benicia City of San Francisco Bay 20% 35.0% 31.6% 86.0 28,086
North Marin Water District San Francisco Bay 24% 36.3% 40.4% 88.2 61,299
Valley of the Moon Water District San Francisco Bay 20% 29.7% 22.1% 90.2 23,478
Palo Alto City of San Francisco Bay 24% 30.7% 20.4% 94.6 64,403
Marin Municipal Water District San Francisco Bay 20% 21.8% 18.3% 96.9 188,200
Napa City of San Francisco Bay 20% 25.6% 19.4% 97.2 86,051
California Water Service Company Livermore San Francisco Bay 24% 44.5% 39.3% 97.4 58,651
Livermore City of Division of Water Resources San Francisco Bay 20% 38.0% 31.5% 101.6 27,588
Contra Costa Water District San Francisco Bay 28% 40.4% 41.1% 102.7 199,680
Pleasanton City of San Francisco Bay 24% 43.3% 37.5% 107.6 73,067
California Water Service Company Los Altos/Suburban San Francisco Bay 32% 37.6% 33.9% 120.3 68,191
Sonoma City of San Francisco Bay 28% 30.5% 16.7% 129.5 11,579
* Cumulative savings is used to assess supplier compliance with mandatory 25 percent statewide conservation.
Data pulled 16 October 2015 Page 5 of 14
September 2015 Water Conservation Report by Supplier (by hydro region, then R-GPCD)
389 suppliers reporting for September
Conservation
Standard
Cumulative
Percent Saved (as compared
to 2013)
Monthly
Percent Saved(as compared
to Sep-13)
Estimated
Monthly
R-GPCD
Total
Population
Served
Supplier Name Hydrologic Region
Cumulative Savings
(June 2015 - September 2015)*Monthly Savings (September 2015)
California Water Service Company Bear Gulch San Francisco Bay 36% 35.7% 29.0% 151.8 70,035
California Water Service Company Stockton San Joaquin River 20% 25.5% 18.8% 73.3 170,703
Calaveras County Water District San Joaquin River 16% 35.5% 28.8% 78.7 48,630
Amador Water Agency San Joaquin River 24% 32.2% 28.2% 78.9 23,347
Patterson City of San Joaquin River 28% 28.7% 43.1% 93.1 21,094
Diablo Water District San Joaquin River 28% 33.8% 30.2% 100.2 38,194
Lathrop, City of San Joaquin River 20% 32.5% 28.4% 101.8 19,831
Ceres City of San Joaquin River 28% 24.4% 18.9% 104.5 47,639
Brentwood City of San Joaquin River 32% 42.1% 36.5% 104.6 56,493
Tuolumne Utilities District San Joaquin River 24% 37.7% 31.4% 104.8 28,997
Antioch City of San Joaquin River 28% 35.0% 31.4% 108.1 108,298
Mountain House Community Services District San Joaquin River n/a 27.8% 27.8% 111.9 14,675
Stockton City of San Joaquin River 28% 32.4% 25.4% 113.7 177,808
Groveland Community Services District San Joaquin River 24% 32.5% 25.6% 123.9 3,400
Manteca City of San Joaquin River 32% 31.6% 28.7% 126.2 75,408
Tracy City of San Joaquin River 28% 30.7% 24.0% 128.8 85,146
City of Newman Water Department San Joaquin River 24% 26.0% 19.0% 130.1 10,668
Livingston City of San Joaquin River 32% 10.8% 14.3% 131.1 14,898
Los Banos, City of San Joaquin River 28% 25.8% 24.2% 134.1 37,168
Madera City of San Joaquin River 28% 29.7% 21.7% 134.9 63,961
Lodi City of Public Works Department San Joaquin River 32% 28.1% 22.4% 135.5 63,651
Turlock City of San Joaquin River 32% 27.1% 26.3% 142.8 71,181
Winton Water & Sanitary District San Joaquin River 36% 23.9% 16.3% 149.2 8,500
Riverbank City of San Joaquin River 32% 15.3% 27.3% 149.4 23,298
Oakdale City of San Joaquin River 32% 40.6% 31.7% 155.4 22,058
Modesto, City of San Joaquin River 36% 28.6% 16.4% 159.4 220,916
Merced City of San Joaquin River 36% 41.3% 36.8% 176.6 83,400
Atwater City of San Joaquin River 36% 35.5% 32.5% 187.3 29,500
Ripon City of San Joaquin River 36% 28.3% 22.5% 218.7 14,915
* Cumulative savings is used to assess supplier compliance with mandatory 25 percent statewide conservation.
Data pulled 16 October 2015 Page 6 of 14
September 2015 Water Conservation Report by Supplier (by hydro region, then R-GPCD)
389 suppliers reporting for September
Conservation
Standard
Cumulative
Percent Saved (as compared
to 2013)
Monthly
Percent Saved(as compared
to Sep-13)
Estimated
Monthly
R-GPCD
Total
Population
Served
Supplier Name Hydrologic Region
Cumulative Savings
(June 2015 - September 2015)*Monthly Savings (September 2015)
Madera County San Joaquin River 36% 33.7% 29.3% 242.6 14,326
California Water Service Company East Los Angeles South Coast 8% 17.1% 17.2% 44.3 158,993
Vernon City of South Coast 8% 3.8% 6.6% 45.3 112
Huntington Park City of South Coast 8% 15.4% 16.3% 46.6 64,219
El Monte City of South Coast 8% 16.6% 18.8% 51.9 22,968
Golden State Water Company Florence Graham South Coast 8% 12.8% 12.7% 53.3 65,492
Oxnard City of South Coast 12% 20.0% 19.6% 54.4 196,720
Golden State Water Company Bell-Bell Gardens South Coast 8% 16.0% 16.5% 54.5 57,934
Seal Beach City of South Coast 8% 22.9% 27.1% 57.4 25,561
Compton City of South Coast 8% 13.5% 8.3% 59.2 81,963
Orchard Dale Water District South Coast 12% 20.8% 24.3% 59.6 25,605
California-American Water Company San Diego District South Coast 8% 27.7% 27.5% 59.6 95,358
Fountain Valley City of South Coast 20% 25.5% 27.0% 59.8 59,227
Sweetwater Authority South Coast 12% 25.4% 24.0% 60.7 191,500
Valley County Water District South Coast 16% 25.3% 26.2% 62.0 71,003
Inglewood City of South Coast 12% 17.7% 17.0% 62.3 86,418
Golden State Water Company Southwest South Coast 12% 15.1% 15.6% 62.4 271,677
Santa Ana City of South Coast 12% 20.4% 21.3% 62.6 332,005
San Gabriel Valley Water Company South Coast 16% 34.5% 23.8% 63.3 271,817
Golden State Water Company S San Gabriel South Coast 12% 15.0% 17.5% 64.1 27,656
City of Big Bear Lake, Dept of Water & Power South Coast 16% 18.5% 12.6% 64.7 25,628
Pomona City of South Coast 20% 26.9% 28.8% 65.1 152,419
San Diego City of South Coast 16% 24.1% 21.7% 65.4 1,314,290
South Gate City of South Coast 12% 14.7% 21.9% 65.4 96,057
Golden State Water Company Norwalk South Coast 12% 20.2% 17.0% 65.8 44,466
Golden State Water Company West Orange South Coast 16% 26.0% 27.6% 66.7 111,904
Hawthorne City of South Coast 16% 10.9% 11.1% 66.9 44,537
Golden State Water Company Artesia South Coast 16% 18.0% 19.8% 68.6 47,978
Port Hueneme City of South Coast 8% 20.6% 18.0% 68.6 21,555
* Cumulative savings is used to assess supplier compliance with mandatory 25 percent statewide conservation.
Data pulled 16 October 2015 Page 7 of 14
September 2015 Water Conservation Report by Supplier (by hydro region, then R-GPCD)
389 suppliers reporting for September
Conservation
Standard
Cumulative
Percent Saved (as compared
to 2013)
Monthly
Percent Saved(as compared
to Sep-13)
Estimated
Monthly
R-GPCD
Total
Population
Served
Supplier Name Hydrologic Region
Cumulative Savings
(June 2015 - September 2015)*Monthly Savings (September 2015)
Irvine Ranch Water District South Coast 16% 16.6% 12.8% 69.2 387,773
Long Beach City of South Coast 16% 18.7% 18.6% 69.2 474,225
Golden State Water Company Culver City South Coast 16% 19.2% 20.5% 69.4 36,215
Montebello Land and Water Company South Coast 16% 18.7% 18.5% 69.6 32,219
Hemet City of South Coast 32% 24.8% 21.4% 70.3 29,982
Paramount City of South Coast 12% 18.6% 10.2% 71.0 55,051
La Palma City of South Coast 20% 26.8% 30.3% 72.1 15,896
Pico Rivera City of South Coast 16% 21.3% 21.6% 73.1 39,002
California Water Service Company Hermosa/Redondo South Coast 20% 19.9% 21.8% 73.3 95,853
San Buenaventura City of South Coast 16% 35.9% 25.4% 73.9 113,478
Santa Fe Springs City of South Coast 16% 25.9% 24.8% 74.5 18,199
Santa Monica City of South Coast 20% 22.6% 23.1% 76.0 93,283
Padre Dam Municipal Water District South Coast 20% 33.3% 34.8% 76.2 90,101
Big Bear City Community Services District South Coast 16% 19.9% 3.2% 76.6 12,411
Los Angeles Department of Water and Power South Coast 16% 19.0% 21.8% 77.0 4,016,064
California Water Service Company Dominguez South Coast 16% 15.9% 22.8% 77.7 142,283
Otay Water District South Coast 20% 27.3% 29.0% 78.1 217,800
Oceanside City of South Coast 20% 26.6% 27.3% 78.5 171,183
Helix Water District South Coast 20% 27.9% 28.0% 78.5 270,375
Mesa Water District South Coast 20% 23.6% 17.8% 78.7 108,000
Vista Irrigation District South Coast 20% 28.9% 29.4% 80.1 124,746
Rowland Water District South Coast 20% 18.3% 18.9% 80.4 62,106
Garden Grove City of South Coast 20% 24.3% 29.3% 80.4 177,020
Perris, City of South Coast 24% 27.2% 31.6% 80.4 9,000
El Segundo City of South Coast 20% 4.3% 3.0% 80.4 16,654
Manhattan Beach City of South Coast 20% 22.9% 23.2% 80.5 35,996
Lakeside Water District South Coast 20% 32.0% 33.6% 80.7 35,500
Bellflower-Somerset Mutual Water Company South Coast 20% 19.9% 20.7% 80.9 46,300
Westminster City of South Coast 20% 20.0% 20.1% 80.9 93,322
* Cumulative savings is used to assess supplier compliance with mandatory 25 percent statewide conservation.
Data pulled 16 October 2015 Page 8 of 14
September 2015 Water Conservation Report by Supplier (by hydro region, then R-GPCD)
389 suppliers reporting for September
Conservation
Standard
Cumulative
Percent Saved (as compared
to 2013)
Monthly
Percent Saved(as compared
to Sep-13)
Estimated
Monthly
R-GPCD
Total
Population
Served
Supplier Name Hydrologic Region
Cumulative Savings
(June 2015 - September 2015)*Monthly Savings (September 2015)
Azusa City of South Coast 20% 24.6% 25.0% 81.1 110,000
Monterey Park City of South Coast 20% 18.7% 21.6% 81.2 62,183
San Gabriel County Water District South Coast 20% 25.0% 26.5% 81.7 45,000
Buena Park City of South Coast 20% 26.2% 31.5% 82.1 82,767
Golden State Water Company Placentia South Coast 24% 30.7% 29.9% 82.7 46,543
Glendale City of South Coast 20% 25.1% 24.5% 83.7 193,300
Downey City of South Coast 20% 24.6% 27.9% 83.9 111,931
Anaheim City of South Coast 20% 25.8% 23.7% 84.0 360,142
Lakewood City of South Coast 20% 29.1% 29.5% 84.3 59,081
Escondido City of South Coast 20% 33.1% 26.5% 84.6 134,053
Vallecitos Water District South Coast 24% 33.8% 39.6% 85.4 95,634
Lomita City of South Coast 20% 20.5% 17.2% 85.4 20,463
Colton, City of South Coast 20% 20.3% 22.0% 85.7 47,612
Golden State Water Company S Arcadia South Coast 24% 30.0% 29.9% 86.2 26,827
Huntington Beach City of South Coast 20% 25.5% 26.7% 86.6 196,041
Newport Beach City of South Coast 28% 22.1% 20.1% 87.9 66,219
Golden State Water Company Simi Valley South Coast 24% 37.1% 37.9% 88.1 43,351
Pico Water District South Coast 24% 24.8% 27.8% 88.4 25,284
San Bernardino County Service Area 70 South Coast 28% 28.1% 19.0% 88.6 11,407
Laguna Beach County Water District South Coast 24% 22.8% 24.5% 89.0 19,121
Sunny Slope Water Company South Coast 24% 29.4% 31.3% 89.5 30,611
Santa Paula City of South Coast 28% 30.0% 27.7% 90.0 30,009
Fullerton City of South Coast 28% 25.2% 27.1% 90.2 138,000
Norwalk City of South Coast 20% 18.3% 19.1% 92.1 18,361
San Clemente City of South Coast 24% 28.2% 30.0% 92.3 51,385
Chino City of South Coast 24% 24.3% 23.9% 93.3 78,073
San Fernando City of South Coast 24% 24.5% 27.3% 93.4 23,645
El Toro Water District South Coast 24% 26.6% 31.1% 93.8 48,628
South Coast Water District South Coast 24% 31.4% 30.0% 94.0 35,004
* Cumulative savings is used to assess supplier compliance with mandatory 25 percent statewide conservation.
Data pulled 16 October 2015 Page 9 of 14
September 2015 Water Conservation Report by Supplier (by hydro region, then R-GPCD)
389 suppliers reporting for September
Conservation
Standard
Cumulative
Percent Saved (as compared
to 2013)
Monthly
Percent Saved(as compared
to Sep-13)
Estimated
Monthly
R-GPCD
Total
Population
Served
Supplier Name Hydrologic Region
Cumulative Savings
(June 2015 - September 2015)*Monthly Savings (September 2015)
Valencia Water Company South Coast 24% 36.9% 38.1% 95.1 118,224
Suburban Water Systems San Jose Hills South Coast 24% 27.3% 28.3% 96.3 178,500
Camarillo City of South Coast 20% 24.3% 25.1% 97.2 47,389
Whittier City of South Coast 20% 21.1% 21.7% 97.6 49,954
Moulton Niguel Water District South Coast 20% 24.1% 26.2% 98.0 172,068
Alhambra City of South Coast 24% 26.8% 27.1% 98.3 85,068
Burbank City of South Coast 24% 28.2% 30.5% 98.8 106,084
Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District South Coast 28% 29.4% 38.9% 99.1 149,507
Carlsbad Municipal Water District South Coast 28% 26.7% 28.5% 99.4 84,838
San Gabriel Valley Fontana Water Company South Coast 28% 31.4% 35.1% 99.6 209,035
Monte Vista Water District South Coast 24% 28.3% 23.3% 99.7 56,039
La Habra City of Public Works South Coast 28% 24.3% 22.4% 101.3 63,118
Orange City of South Coast 28% 28.1% 29.7% 102.6 139,463
Eastern Municipal Water District South Coast 28% 21.0% 23.8% 102.9 539,410
Santa Margarita Water District South Coast 24% 29.3% 30.0% 103.6 156,949
Lincoln Avenue Water Company South Coast 28% 31.9% 32.3% 103.8 16,126
Rubidoux Community Service District South Coast 28% 22.7% 27.0% 104.3 32,000
Brea City of South Coast 24% 22.3% 32.6% 105.9 43,328
Suburban Water Systems Whittier/La Mirada South Coast 28% 27.1% 30.1% 106.4 115,000
San Juan Capistrano City of South Coast 28% 26.9% 27.7% 106.6 39,047
San Jacinto City of South Coast 32% 33.5% 33.3% 107.4 15,582
Pasadena City of South Coast 28% 24.2% 24.7% 107.5 166,482
Covina City of South Coast 28% 25.9% 27.8% 108.3 33,300
Ramona Municipal Water District South Coast 28% 33.8% 37.3% 108.4 36,564
South Pasadena City of South Coast 28% 31.5% 34.7% 108.8 25,899
Tustin City of South Coast 28% 30.0% 34.7% 109.2 67,700
Golden State Water Company San Dimas South Coast 28% 34.4% 33.9% 109.5 54,872
Lee Lake Water District South Coast 32% 35.2% 39.6% 111.5 15,543
Riverside City of South Coast 28% 26.1% 27.9% 114.1 299,626
* Cumulative savings is used to assess supplier compliance with mandatory 25 percent statewide conservation.
Data pulled 16 October 2015 Page 10 of 14
September 2015 Water Conservation Report by Supplier (by hydro region, then R-GPCD)
389 suppliers reporting for September
Conservation
Standard
Cumulative
Percent Saved (as compared
to 2013)
Monthly
Percent Saved(as compared
to Sep-13)
Estimated
Monthly
R-GPCD
Total
Population
Served
Supplier Name Hydrologic Region
Cumulative Savings
(June 2015 - September 2015)*Monthly Savings (September 2015)
San Bernardino City of South Coast 28% 30.7% 30.9% 115.2 198,163
Chino Hills City of South Coast 28% 29.1% 37.8% 115.2 77,596
Cerritos City of South Coast 28% 25.9% 26.8% 115.9 49,041
Ventura County Waterworks District No. 8 South Coast 28% 30.5% 32.8% 116.7 90,687
Thousand Oaks City of South Coast 28% 32.6% 33.7% 117.8 51,609
Rialto City of South Coast 28% 19.6% 22.5% 118.3 54,036
La Verne City of South Coast 32% 32.3% 34.0% 118.5 32,228
Rincon Del Diablo Municipal Water District South Coast 32% 34.1% 34.9% 119.5 29,955
Monrovia City of South Coast 28% 26.7% 34.0% 121.0 39,147
San Dieguito Water District South Coast 28% 22.3% 24.5% 121.2 37,168
Lake Hemet Municipal Water District South Coast 28% 41.0% 46.5% 121.5 52,914
Castaic Lake Water Agency Santa Clarita Water Division South Coast 32% 35.4% 37.6% 122.5 121,688
Triunfo Sanitation District / Oak Park Water Service South Coast 32% 38.1% 43.8% 124.9 12,200
Fallbrook Public Utility District South Coast 36% 28.1% 33.3% 125.6 34,894
Western Municipal Water District of Riverside South Coast 32% 29.2% 32.4% 127.4 96,139
Corona City of South Coast 28% 23.9% 27.9% 127.8 168,070
Jurupa Community Service District South Coast 28% 26.8% 30.9% 128.6 118,731
Trabuco Canyon Water District South Coast 28% 34.3% 37.0% 129.2 13,175
Fillmore City of South Coast 28% 27.0% 23.9% 129.3 15,222
Glendora City of South Coast 36% 35.7% 36.4% 129.6 51,463
Ventura County Waterworks District No 1 South Coast 32% 28.3% 29.2% 131.1 38,703
Sanger City of South Coast 28% 24.4% 21.6% 134.0 25,664
Golden State Water Company Claremont South Coast 32% 44.0% 42.3% 135.1 37,160
Loma Linda City of South Coast 32% 24.5% 25.8% 137.3 23,614
Casitas Municipal Water District South Coast 32% 29.3% 12.1% 138.1 9,603
Yorba Linda Water District South Coast 36% 41.6% 43.7% 139.6 72,500
Newhall County Water District South Coast 28% 31.7% 34.4% 139.7 45,036
Poway City of South Coast 32% 36.7% 35.7% 140.7 48,774
Olivenhain Municipal Water District South Coast 32% 32.9% 30.5% 142.3 78,713
* Cumulative savings is used to assess supplier compliance with mandatory 25 percent statewide conservation.
Data pulled 16 October 2015 Page 11 of 14
September 2015 Water Conservation Report by Supplier (by hydro region, then R-GPCD)
389 suppliers reporting for September
Conservation
Standard
Cumulative
Percent Saved (as compared
to 2013)
Monthly
Percent Saved(as compared
to Sep-13)
Estimated
Monthly
R-GPCD
Total
Population
Served
Supplier Name Hydrologic Region
Cumulative Savings
(June 2015 - September 2015)*Monthly Savings (September 2015)
California-American Water Company Los Angeles District South Coast 28% 31.2% 34.0% 143.1 102,889
California-American Water Ventura District South Coast 32% 28.4% 31.8% 143.1 62,144
East Valley Water District South Coast 28% 31.2% 24.2% 145.4 101,733
West Valley Water District South Coast 32% 22.7% 26.0% 154.5 73,836
Upland City of South Coast 36% 32.0% 33.0% 157.6 75,670
Beverly Hills City of South Coast 32% 20.4% 20.5% 161.0 42,157
Arcadia City of South Coast 36% 30.1% 33.5% 161.6 57,639
Rancho California Water District South Coast 36% 31.2% 35.7% 164.9 168,978
Valley Center Municipal Water District South Coast 36% 42.1% 49.3% 166.1 25,458
Rainbow Municipal Water District South Coast 36% 43.0% 55.3% 166.7 19,495
Norco City of South Coast 36% 27.4% 32.6% 167.0 25,891
Riverside Highland Water Company South Coast 36% 34.4% 36.6% 167.5 14,949
Las Virgenes Municipal Water District South Coast 36% 34.0% 36.2% 177.1 75,384
California Water Service Company Palos Verdes South Coast 36% 32.0% 34.8% 184.4 69,937
Rubio Canyon Land and Water Association South Coast 36% 30.0% 25.8% 186.4 9,600
Sierra Madre City of South Coast 32% 23.0% 19.3% 188.0 11,094
East Orange County Water District South Coast 36% 39.6% 41.8% 192.6 3,247
Yucaipa Valley Water District South Coast 36% 25.0% 23.3% 202.6 44,656
Beaumont-Cherry Valley Water District South Coast 36% 27.0% 31.1% 203.1 43,111
California Water Service Company Westlake South Coast 36% 35.4% 39.0% 218.8 19,447
Golden State Water Company Cowan Heights South Coast 36% 38.7% 39.7% 232.2 7,254
Redlands City of South Coast 36% 25.1% 30.2% 235.4 77,852
Los Angeles County Public Works Waterworks District 29 South Coast 36% 24.2% 25.0% 247.4 22,216
Valley Water Company South Coast 36% 31.8% 34.7% 267.2 9,900
Serrano Water District South Coast 36% 43.2% 43.6% 271.2 6,641
Santa Fe Irrigation District South Coast 36% 39.9% 38.0% 357.8 19,839
Crestline Village Water District South Lahontan 8% 24.0% 25.8% 52.1 7,565
San Bernardino County Service Area 64 South Lahontan 32% 35.2% 39.8% 53.4 14,031
Lake Arrowhead Community Services District South Lahontan 16% 34.1% 35.9% 62.0 21,052
* Cumulative savings is used to assess supplier compliance with mandatory 25 percent statewide conservation.
Data pulled 16 October 2015 Page 12 of 14
September 2015 Water Conservation Report by Supplier (by hydro region, then R-GPCD)
389 suppliers reporting for September
Conservation
Standard
Cumulative
Percent Saved (as compared
to 2013)
Monthly
Percent Saved(as compared
to Sep-13)
Estimated
Monthly
R-GPCD
Total
Population
Served
Supplier Name Hydrologic Region
Cumulative Savings
(June 2015 - September 2015)*Monthly Savings (September 2015)
Mammoth Community Water District South Lahontan 20% 38.8% 31.2% 64.7 16,739
Phelan Pinon Hills Community Services District South Lahontan 32% 18.5% 23.0% 90.3 25,160
Golden State Water Company Barstow South Lahontan 24% 25.9% 18.9% 96.1 31,209
Adelanto City of South Lahontan 20% 14.7% 18.2% 97.4 28,723
Apple Valley Ranchos Water Company South Lahontan 28% 32.5% 32.9% 102.6 62,602
Rosamond Community Service District South Lahontan 28% 31.8% 33.8% 116.9 17,700
Palmdale Water District South Lahontan 32% 29.6% 30.2% 120.1 116,183
Victorville Water District South Lahontan 28% 27.8% 24.7% 126.9 125,896
Hesperia Water District City of South Lahontan 32% 24.9% 23.0% 133.1 91,627
California Water Service Company Antelope Valley South Lahontan 36% 45.0% 54.2% 135.3 3,391
Los Angeles County Public Works Waterworks District 40 South Lahontan 32% 36.6% 27.4% 148.6 207,304
Indian Wells Valley Water District South Lahontan 36% 24.7% 18.8% 202.7 31,120
Quartz Hill Water District South Lahontan 36% 38.4% 35.2% 211.1 20,352
Lemoore City of Tulare Lake 32% 23.2% 34.6% 79.0 25,281
Delano City of Tulare Lake 24% 22.8% 18.0% 81.4 54,318
Reedley City of Tulare Lake 24% 23.4% 22.4% 87.5 24,194
Arvin Community Services District Tulare Lake 28% 32.3% 23.1% 90.3 20,499
Wasco City of Tulare Lake 36% 24.8% 22.1% 114.4 26,159
Tehachapi, City of Tulare Lake 28% 30.0% 26.3% 117.5 8,839
California Water Service Company Kern River Valley Tulare Lake 28% 18.8% 21.5% 117.6 5,595
West Kern Water District Tulare Lake 28% 18.2% 1.6% 122.8 21,181
Lamont Public Utility District Tulare Lake 28% 27.9% 23.5% 127.8 20,009
California Water Service Company Selma Tulare Lake 32% 40.7% 39.6% 127.8 25,065
Pinedale County Water District Tulare Lake 36% 27.6% 26.0% 128.1 16,735
Porterville City of Tulare Lake 32% 35.0% 34.5% 130.3 61,946
Fresno City of Tulare Lake 28% 28.0% 22.3% 137.4 520,159
California Water Service Company Bakersfield Tulare Lake 32% 34.6% 36.3% 140.3 279,143
California Water Service Company Visalia Tulare Lake 32% 25.1% 21.6% 144.8 139,027
Kerman, City of Tulare Lake 32% 26.0% 21.4% 155.2 14,359
* Cumulative savings is used to assess supplier compliance with mandatory 25 percent statewide conservation.
Data pulled 16 October 2015 Page 13 of 14
September 2015 Water Conservation Report by Supplier (by hydro region, then R-GPCD)
389 suppliers reporting for September
Conservation
Standard
Cumulative
Percent Saved (as compared
to 2013)
Monthly
Percent Saved(as compared
to Sep-13)
Estimated
Monthly
R-GPCD
Total
Population
Served
Supplier Name Hydrologic Region
Cumulative Savings
(June 2015 - September 2015)*Monthly Savings (September 2015)
Exeter City of Tulare Lake 36% 32.3% 27.9% 155.4 10,572
Hanford City of Tulare Lake 28% 11.0% 15.5% 155.5 57,050
Coalinga City of Tulare Lake 32% 31.8% 19.2% 168.7 16,529
Shafter City of Tulare Lake 36% 29.1% 23.8% 177.2 19,100
Clovis City of Tulare Lake 36% 32.0% 27.6% 180.6 108,227
Bakman Water Company Tulare Lake 36% 31.9% 25.8% 186.9 16,756
East Niles Community Service District Tulare Lake 36% 30.7% 26.0% 189.6 31,772
Corcoran, City of Tulare Lake 36% 31.8% 25.5% 191.5 24,154
Oildale Mutual Water Company Tulare Lake 36% 30.6% 33.8% 192.1 33,163
Kingsburg, City of Tulare Lake 36% 40.1% 44.5% 194.0 11,685
Bakersfield City of Tulare Lake 36% 31.5% 29.0% 207.9 143,148
Vaughn Water Company Tulare Lake 36% 28.9% 24.2% 359.0 30,861
* Cumulative savings is used to assess supplier compliance with mandatory 25 percent statewide conservation.
Data pulled 16 October 2015 Page 14 of 14