september 18, 2006

23
1 September 18, 2006 Hurricane Katrina - Immediate Response & Immediate Response & Long Term Challenges Long Term Challenges Joel Whitehead Joel Whitehead Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard Eighth District Commander Eighth District Commander

Upload: todd

Post on 14-Jan-2016

34 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Hurricane Katrina - Immediate Response & Long Term Challenges Joel Whitehead Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard Eighth District Commander. September 18, 2006. Key Topics. Summary of Coast Guard Katrina Response - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: September 18, 2006

1

September 18, 2006

Hurricane Katrina -Immediate Response &Immediate Response &Long Term ChallengesLong Term Challenges

Joel WhiteheadJoel Whitehead Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast GuardRear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard Eighth District CommanderEighth District Commander

Page 2: September 18, 2006

2

Key Topics

Summary of Coast Guard Katrina Response

Managing Risk in Areas Supplying Response Assets to Incidents of National Significance

Maritime Recovery Initiatives

Development of a Coast Guard Deployable Operations Group (DOG)

Page 3: September 18, 2006

3

Katrina – Response

Page 4: September 18, 2006

4

Mission PreparednessDistrict 8District 8

St. Louis, MO

Sector New OrleansSector New Orleans

Alexandria, LA

Sector MobileSector Mobile

Maxwell AFB, AL

Atlantic AreaAtlantic Area

Supporting Air StationsSupporting Air StationsCuttersCutters

District 8District 8

Sector New OrleansSector New Orleans

Evacuated Command & Control Node

Temporary Command & Control Node

Sector MobileSector Mobile

Page 5: September 18, 2006

5

Initial Response• Saving lives in distress first priority

– First rescues made at sea and on land as the storm was still coming ashore

• Pre-positioned air and sea assets around perimeter of Katrina’s projected destruction zone

• Rapidly surged additional assets to affected zone after landfall

Page 6: September 18, 2006

6

Surged Response

AssetIn theater

Normal Ops (LA, AL, MS)

Land fall plus 12 hours

Land fall plus 24 hours

Land fall plus 48 hours

Cutter 16 24 26 26

Helicopter 15 28 30 38Fixed-Wing Aviation 4 8 11 14

Page 7: September 18, 2006

7

Katrina Search & Rescue Results29-30 Aug 31 Aug 1 Sep 2 Sep 3 Sep Total Rescues

RESCUED 1,256 1,600 1,141 5,000 6,655 24,135

HOSPITALEVACUATIONS         9,400 9,409

TOTAL 1,259 2,859 4,000 9,000 25,055 33,544

Page 8: September 18, 2006

8

Katrina Pollution Response Results

•Pacific, Atlantic, & Gulf Strike Teams responded•Coordinated response to 2,300 pollution cases•Recovered approximately 2-million gallons of oil

Page 9: September 18, 2006

9

Summary of Response ForcesForces assisting in SAR and environmental response (not all inclusive):• DHS:

– USCG: 3,900 active and reserve personnel– CBP: 500 personnel & 20 fixed/rotary wing aircraft– ICE: 725 personnel– FEMA: 87 National Disaster Medical System Teams & 23 Urban SAR

Teams• FBI: Provided rescue boats• DoD: Aircraft, troops, ships, salvage, command/control & logistics support• EPA/NOAA• Forest Service• National Guard: Deployed 50,000 troops • State/Local:

- NOLA police/fire/emergency, LA State police & Ramsey County Sheriff- Firefighters/emergency workers from various States

Page 10: September 18, 2006

10

Managing Risk in Areas Supplying Response Assets to Incidents of National Significance

Page 11: September 18, 2006

11

National Response Posture AffectedSearch and Rescue:

• Nationwide deepwater & coastal zone missions impacted

• National response readiness degraded Canada covered NW Atlantic search and rescue

• All aviation training flights deferred until completion of Katrina response

Page 12: September 18, 2006

12

National Response Posture Affected

Environmental Response:

• National Strike Force Teams provided assets from around the country

• Commercial pollution response personnel and equipment deployed to support Katrina & Rita cleanups

• Certain facilities in unaffected areas forced to reduce transfer operations due to lack of resources from their contract Oil Spill Removal Organizations (OSROs)

Page 13: September 18, 2006

13

OSRO Policy Currently Under Revision

• Coast Guard exploring options to address pollution response shortfalls when resources are responding to Spills or Incidents of National Significance.

• Possible alternatives include:– Allowing companies to temporarily contract with alternate OSROs

– Temporarily relaxing equipment requirements for low probability events (e.g. worst case or maximum probable discharge scenarios)

– Expand Coast Guard’s role to include strategic placement of available response resources when shortages are identified

– In extreme cases where commercial coverage is not available, the Coast Guard may direct its own remaining assets to act as an alternate OSRO

Page 14: September 18, 2006

14

Maritime Recovery Initiatives

Page 15: September 18, 2006

15

Coast Guard Katrina Priorities

1. Save and Sustain Lives

2. Secure and Restore Ports, Waterways & Infrastructure

3. Oil, Chemical and Hazardous Material Response

4. Sustain Coast Guard Operations

Page 16: September 18, 2006

16

Damage to Offshore Facilities

PLATFORM MARS

BEFORE & AFTER

KATRINA

PLATFORM TYPHOON BEFORE &

AFTER RITA

Page 17: September 18, 2006

17

Open

Restricted, butoperational

Closed, or Substantially impacted

LegendCorpusChristi

Port O’Connor

Freeport, open to 28 ft, daylight only

Galveston

Houston

Port Arthur

Lake Charles

Morgan City

Texas Louisiana

Brownsville

As of 26 Sep 05

USACE, NOAA, and Kirby Marine coordinating major port surveys & the GICW

New OrleansHouston Ship Channel open

to 35ft, daylight only

GICW closed from Sabine Pass to the LMR

GICW open from Freeport to Brownsville

PORT & WATERWAY STATUSPORT & WATERWAY STATUS

Page 18: September 18, 2006

18

Ports, Waterways, & Infrastructure

• Katrina aftermath exposed need for integrated government and industry recovery plan

• Lack of communications led to additional incidents during restoration phase

• Implications of port closures not fully understood

• Alternate paths for cargo flow not identified in advance

Page 19: September 18, 2006

19

Actions to Improve Recovery

• Coast Guard held 1st National Maritime Recovery Symposium in August 2006

• Need for several initiatives identified:– Integrated government / industry recovery management org– Integrated government / industry communications system for

recovery– National Logistics Support Plan for cargo diversion during a

national emergency– Integrated government / industry Business Continuity Planning

System– Funding mechanism to support local, state, and national recovery

preparedness– Raised awareness of interconnection / interdependency of ports

with the national transportation system.

Page 20: September 18, 2006

20

Actions to Improve Recovery (cont)

• Commence meetings with members of the Business Roundtable (Fortune 200) to further explore concepts for recovery and restoration coordination.

• Lead the coordination with industry to form a Maritime Sector Coordinating Council

• Capitalize on existing forums and partner with other DHS agencies to develop a maritime concept of operations.

Page 21: September 18, 2006

21

Development of a Coast Guard Deployable Operations Group (DOG)

Page 22: September 18, 2006

22

Deployable Operations Group (DOG)

• Developing deployable command to supplement existing shore and deepwater assets

• First command will stand up in summer of 2007

• Deployable forces will include security, law enforcement, and environmental responders

Page 23: September 18, 2006

23

Questions