september 1, 2010, brussels epp hearing the swedish universities perspective on simplifying the...

6
September 1, 2010, Brussels EPP Hearing The Swedish universities’ perspective on Simplifying the implementation of the research framework programmes Pam Fredman Chairman SUHF - the Association of Swedish Higher Education Vice-chancellor, University of Gothenburg

Upload: victoria-egan

Post on 27-Mar-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: September 1, 2010, Brussels EPP Hearing The Swedish universities perspective on Simplifying the implementation of the research framework programmes Pam

September 1, 2010, Brussels

EPP Hearing

The Swedish universities’ perspective on

Simplifying the implementation of the research framework programmes

Pam Fredman

Chairman SUHF - the Association of Swedish Higher Education

Vice-chancellor, University of Gothenburg

Page 2: September 1, 2010, Brussels EPP Hearing The Swedish universities perspective on Simplifying the implementation of the research framework programmes Pam

The key roles of the universities:

• High quality education

• Independent research

www.gu.se

Page 3: September 1, 2010, Brussels EPP Hearing The Swedish universities perspective on Simplifying the implementation of the research framework programmes Pam

Recommendations:

Scientific excellence as the key driver in all research projects• further emphasis on bottom-up research projects within all

thematic programmes

• peer review system with scientific excellence as the main criteria

Move towards full-costing and a trust-based approach for the universities’ own accounting systems

www.gu.se

Page 4: September 1, 2010, Brussels EPP Hearing The Swedish universities perspective on Simplifying the implementation of the research framework programmes Pam

Strand 1 “Streamlining proposal and grant management under the existing rules”

• reduce the number of scientific and financial reports to 1-2 per project and minimize the details on the use of resources

• ensure a uniform interpretation of rules and regulations in all research funding programmes

• reduce time to contract

www.gu.se

Page 5: September 1, 2010, Brussels EPP Hearing The Swedish universities perspective on Simplifying the implementation of the research framework programmes Pam

Strand 2 “Adapting the rules under the current cost-based system”

Harmonize and simplify the participant rules & financial regulations

• a variety of funding instruments is important, but should not lead to a complex structure of different rules on application, negotiation procedures, reimbursement rates, Intellectual Property Rights etc.

Move towards full-costing:

• consider all direct and indirect costs as eligible when registered in the official accounts of the beneficiary, compliant with national accounting and auditing standards

www.gu.se

Page 6: September 1, 2010, Brussels EPP Hearing The Swedish universities perspective on Simplifying the implementation of the research framework programmes Pam

Strand 3 “Moving towards result-based instead of cost-based funding”

Not supported: • could be detrimental and result in projects with lower risk and a lower degree of true scientific exploration

• greater risk for inducing conflicts in consortia which requires complex consortium agreements

Instead:

• funding should correspond to actual project costs

• high-trust approach for large public bodies and their financial accounting systems

www.gu.se