Reference 22 Page 1SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION

Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete em 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. rint your name and address on the reverse

so that we can return the card to you. • Attach this can:! to the back of the , .. Ji,1 f.'.'!'~;_.,;.•

or on the front if space permits.

1. Article Addressed to:

66-20-2 DJC/mfewis Mr. Lee Rish .Jim's Cleaners 2605 West 16'" Street Indianapolis, Indiana 46222

0 Registered 0 Insured Mail

0 Express Mail 0 Return Receipt for Merchandise 0 C.O.D.

4. Restricted Deliver-y? (Extra Fee) 0 Yes

2. Article Number((;opy f:o~rv:1;e labey- ,£J . . . . , ,

'7al>Qib?,O .~3 v6TL,32~1·· 1\ I t.

PS Form 3811, July 1999 Domestic Return Receipt

Reference 22 Page 2

• Send p .. .,.,. cJ 1 " 'vi --~·- · · er: lease priht,your , ~ " - -~ - ---- ···--.:.:~e, address and ZIP+4-·- .... :--···· __ . '··-- .. !~JDIS bOX.!~ -- ---·-INDIANA OEPARTMENli

OF I:_N\IIRONMENTAL MAN~GEMEtnj OFFICE OF L,.ANO QUALIT'{,

P.O. eo)( 6015 tNOIANAPO\.JS. \ND\~NA 46206-6015'

::+~·-............ :.~,.:~~~~~-----.......;....,.... ____ -:---:------J -·..::.•.):::·"tc:::·Oi!S I I I II .

I " I ... ~r~m""lf' .. ll"ll""""l'l'"""l'l'';l"."

/

/

Reference 22 Page 3~Q_,o INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT

We make Indiana a cleaner, healthier place to live

Frank 0 'Bannon Governor

Lori F. Kaplan Commissioner

1 00 North Senate Avenue P.O. Box 6015 Indianapolis, Indiana 46206-6015 (31 7) 232-8603 (800) 451-6027 www.state.in.us/idem

VIA CERTIFIED MAIL 7000 0520 0023 5041 3743 October 23, 2001

Ms. Lee Rish Jim's Cleaners 2605 W. 16th Street Indianapolis, Indiana 46222

Dear Ms. Rish:

Re: Inspection Results Industrial Waste Management Compliance Evaluation

ftlilil!§l<!ll~at\l@i EPA I.D. NWJDW:ID1iJJI)])g@Il[(!)k}~IJ Indianapolis, tf/ilr0a(@]f4.t-

Representatives of the Department of Environmental Management (Department) are conducting inspections of facilities in Indiana that are engaged in the generation, transportation, treatment, storage, or disposal of industrial waste. Facilities are being inspected to determine compliance with, but not limited to,"Environmental Management Act"; IC 13, "Indiana Administrative Code"; 329 lAC 3.1, "Hazardous Waste Management Permit Program and Related Hazardous Waste Management Requirements"; 329 lAC 3.1, "Solid Waste Land Disposal Facilities"; 329 lAC 10, 11 and 12,"Used Oil Management"; 329 lAC 13, and rules promulgated pursuant to those statutes. These inspections and record reviews are also being conducted pursuant to the requirements of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), Public Law 94-580, as amended, for authorized state hazardous waste management programs.

This is to inform you that on September 20, 2001, I conducted an inspection of Jim's Cleaners, located at 2605 W. 16th Street in Indianapolis. You represented your firm. For your information, a summary of the inspection report is provided below:

Type of Inspection: ..x_ Complete Industrial Waste Inspection Limited Industrial Waste Inspection Special Waste Landfill Inspection Complaint Other: ____________ _

.. Rt•!'ycfnl Paper $ An Equal Opportunity Employer Plnut' Rt'cyclt' '-l

Reference 22 Page 4

Jim's Cleaners Inspection Results Page 2

Results oflnspection: _

• . .

Additional information is required to evaluate overall compliance before you will receive a completed report. In compliance, no violations observed. In compliance, violations were observed but were corrected during the inspection. See inspection report. Violations were observed and require a follow-up inspection. See inspection report. Re-inspection will be conducted after ___ _ Violations were observed and require a submittal. See inspection report. Submittal is due-----------!. Violations were observed and are being referred to our Office of'Enforcement. See inspection report.

Please direct any response to this letter and any questions to me at 317-308-3118.

Enclosure

·., Sincerely,

. l>btotz Ch£fu},\WL/ Debbie Chesterson Environmental Manager Industrial Waste Compliance Section Compliance and Response Branch Office of Land Quality

cc: Marion County Health Department

Reference 22 Page 5- INDIANADEPAAENTOF ( /)_/'

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT fV INDUSTRIAL/HAZARDOUS WASTE INSPECTION REPORT

Please type/Print II~Pii'S~maner~ Facilitv Name·

Location: ~ 2605 W. 16th St. ~ ./{ '

City: Indianapolis Counr'OOFar.i'&W ') Zip: 46222

Inspector's Name: II Debbie Chesterson \..___,/

EPA Hazardous Waste I.D. # Date(s) Time

8J:IDX!l:(lf(ff.~IDlf.IDli~ .. ] 09/20/2001 3:45pm

A. PRE-INSPECTION REVIEW

I. II

File Review

Notification Date: 1 04/1111994

Notification Activities: I Small quantity generator

Has a Part B Permit Been Issued? Yes/No I No I Permit Expiration Date: I Permitted n/a Units· Interim n/a Status l Jnits: Post Closure n/a T Tnits

II. II

Compliance History

Previous Inspection Date: Never inspected Complete Focused

Follow-up Complaint

List Unresolved Violations:

Comments:

Form Revised 112001 Industrial/Hazardous Waste Inspection Report Page I

Reference 22 Page 6

B. INSPECTION FINDINGS

I. II Type and Size of Operation, Products, Processes That Produce Waste (hazardous or non-hazardous).

Jim's Cleaners is a commercial dry cleaner operating one dry to dry machine. The primary waste stream generated is a F002 waste of lint and filters. ·

II. II Regulatory Status/Activity for Hazardous and Industrial Waste (Based on Inspection)

Jim's Cleaners notified as a small quantity generator of hazardous waste. Based on this inspection, it appears that they are operating as a conditionally exempt small quantity generator.

III. II Hazardous Waste Streams (including Universal Waste)

EPA #/Description Sources/Process Generation Rate Disposition

F002/Lint and filters Dry to dry machine 4 filters/yr. Solid waste dumpster

Revised 1/2001 Industrial/Hazardous Waste Inspection Report Page2

Reference 22 Page 7..

IV. Jl R .. ..l '~.-•· ..l ..l Hazardous Waste Streams or Units and Reason for Exemption

n/a

V. II Transporter(s) Used (Include both Industrial and Hazardous Waste Transporters)

Not inspected

VI. II Non-Hazardous Waste I Industrial Waste I Used Oil

Description Source/Process Generation Rate Disposition

Revised 11200 I Industrial/Hazardous Waste Inspection Report Page 3

Reference 22 Page 8

VII. /1 <;::ontainer Management Area(s) (including Used Oil) <90(180) Day Accumulation <90(180) Day Accumulation

Descrintion of unit Descrintion of Unit

Location: n/a Location:

Waste Code #/Size of Containers Waste code #/Size of Containers

<90(180) Day Accumulation Descrintion of unit

Location:

Waste Code #/Size of Containers

VIII. II Satellite Accumulation Area(s) I Universal Waste Accumulation Area(s)

Location Waste Code(s)/Process Comments

n/a

Revised I /200 I Industrial/Hazardous Waste Inspection Report Page4

Reference 22 Page 9

IX: II Hazardous Waste/Used Oil Tanks

Waste Codes/Location Type/Construction Size Quantity On-Site

n/a

X. II Other Regulated Unit(s) (i.e. Containment Building, Waste Piles, etc.)

Waste Codes/Location Type/Construction Size Quantity On-Site

n/a

Revised 112001 Industrial/Hazardous Waste Inspection Report Page 5

Reference 22 Page 10

XI. Company is subject to the following regulations

X 40 CFR 261.5 I 329 lAC 3.1-6 Conditionally Exempt Generator I 40 CFR 262 I 329 lAC 3.1-7 Generator Standards I 40 CFR Part 263 I 329 lAC 3.1-8 Transporter Standards I 40 CFR Part 2641265 I 329 IAC3.1-9 & 10 Facility Standards I

40 CFR Subpart I Container Standards I 40 CFR Subpart J Tank Standards I

• 40 CFR Subpart AA Air Emission- Process Vent I 40 CFR Subpart BB Air Emission - Equipment Leaks I 40 CFR Subpart CC Air Emission- Tanks, Surface Impoundments & Containers

Other (specify): I 40 CFR Part 266 I 329 lAC 1-11 (specify): I 40 CFR Part 273 I 329 lAC 3.1-16 & Universal Waste I 329 lAC 13 Used Oil Management I 327 lAC 2-10 Secondary Containment Rule

329 lAC 9 Underground Storage Tank Rule ' IC 13-20-7.5 Industrial Waste Law

Other (specify): I

XII. Additional Comments (Include Non-Program Violations) Include information regarding how the company is complying with the notification requirement of IC 13-20-7.5 for Industrial Waste.

XIII. Please list guidance materials provided to facility:

To be mailed along with this checklist: Handler Identification form Understanding the Hazardous Waste Rules

Revised 1/2001 Industrial/Hazardous Waste Inspection Report Page 6

Reference 22 Page 11

XIV.// . Narrative I Description of Violations

Facility Name: Jim's Cleaners ID#: IN0000204065

Address: 2605 W. 16th Street Indianapolis, IN 46222 Inspection Date: 09/20/01

The Indiana Hazardous Waste Rules, 329 lAC 3.1, incorporates by reference federal standards, which have been published in the Code of Federal Regulations as 40 CFR 260 through 40 CFR 270. Citations reference the federal rules as incorporated, except where the State rule substitutes full text language, in which case the specific 329 lAC 3.1 citation will be used. If the facility has been issued a permit, specific permit conditions may be cited.

Regulatory Citation Violation Observed/Suggested Correction and Compliance Date

On September 20, 2001, a compliance evaluation inspection was conducted at Plainfield Quality Cleaners. The facility was found to be in compliance with the hazardous waste regulations. This facility notified as a small quantity generator of hazardous waste. However, based on this inspection it appears that they are operating as a conditionally exempt small quantity generator. A Handler Update Form is included with this checklist which should be completed and mailed to this office in order to rectify this matter.

**ATTACH FACILITY MAP WITH LOCATION OF HAZARDOUS WASTE ACTIVITY INDICATED

Revised 1/2001 Industrial/Hazardous Waste Inspection Report Page 7

Reference 22 Page 12Indiana De.ment of Environmental Manaianent

Multimedia Screening Checklist for Air, Water, Industrial Waste, Underground Storage Tanks and Toxic Release Inventory

Facility Name Plainfield Cleaners Address 2605 W. 16th Street

SIC Codes for Facility (Primary and Others) 7216 Description of Major Processes and Estimated Production Commercial dry cleaner operating a dry to dry machine.

Facility Contact Interviewed Name Lee E. Rish Position Owner

Facility Contact Lee E. Rish Phone 317-686-1860 Zip 46222

Date of Inspection 09/20/01

Inspector Name(s) Debbie Chesterson

Certified Stack Reader No

County Marion

Final 8/28/00

1. Does the facility have an air permit? D Yes ~ No If YES, specify: A) Permit Type: Choose One Other: B) Permit #(s), including amendments and modification #(s):

2. Were any visible emissions (except steam) from any stack or vent observed? D Yes [gj No

If YES, specify: A) Process (boiler, paint booth, grinders, etc.):

Boiler: emissions darker than light gray (approximately 20% opacity) indicate potential problem with the operation. Start-up/shutdown exempted Spray booth stacks: generally there should be no visible emissions.

B) Control device (baghouse, scrubber, etc.) or lack of control:

C) Description of emissions (color, duration, constant vs. intermittent, time of day):

IF YOU ARE A CERTIFIED STACK READER, ATTACH VISIBLE EMISSIONS (VE) READINGS. IF VE READINGS NOT TAKEN, SPECIFY VE SOURCE AND PROVIDE ESTIMATION OF OPACITY.

Reference 22 Page 13

3. Was any dust (not from a stack) observed being generated? D Yes No

If YES, specify: A) Location: (in-plant roads, doors, windows, roof openings, coal piles, waste storage areas, etc.):

B) Activity: (vehicle traffic, vehicle dumping, leaks in duct work or storage bins, wind generated, etc.):

C) Was the dust visible crossing the property line (excluding steam)? D Yes D No If YES, at ground level? D Yes D No Describe:

4. Was any evidence of open burning observed? D Yes 1:8:1 No

If YES, TAKE PHOTOGRAPH and specify: A) Location:

B) Type of material (tree limbs, plastic, rubber, office paper, rags/wipes, coal pile, etc.):

C) Does the facility have a written variance to burn from OAM (e.g., fire training)?

5. Was any asbestos removal or demolition activity observed (removal of load supporting structure)? If YES, specify location within the facility:

6) For wood furniture facilities: A) Were observed solvent containers closed when not in use? B) Are filters securely in place when spray booth is in operation?

7) Does this company chrome electroplate or anodize? If YES, specify: A) Number of hard chrome tanks: B) Number of decorative chrome tanks: C) Number of chrome anodizing tanks:

2

D Yes

D Yes

D Yes

D Yes

D Yes

D No

1:8:1 No

D No

D No

1:8:1 No

Reference 22 Page 14

1. Does the facility have a water permit? If YES, specify: A) Permit Type: Choose One B) Permit#:

C) Expiration Date:

2. Are any industrial process wastewaters being generated at this facility? If YES, specify: A) Description ofwastewaters:

B) Disposition of wastewaters: Process: Treated? D Yes D No If YES, specify:

i. Type of treatment: ii. Discharge location: Surface water? D Yes

If Yes, name of water: Municipal sewer system? D Yes

D No

D Yes 1:8:1 No

D Yes 1:8:1 No

Non-process: Non-contact cooling water: D No D Yes D No If YES, specify:

i. Recycled D Yes D No iii. Wastes stored/hauled off-site?

D Yes D No

3. Was any indication observed that process materials such as cleaners, solvents, paints, lubricants, etc. are escaping through floor drains?

If YES, specify: A) Description of materials:

B) Specify where .floor drain leads: D Treated/discharged to receiving stream. Name of receiving stream: D Municipal collection system (sanitary, combined or storm): D Recycled/returned flow: D Stored/hauled off-site: D Other (explain): D Undetermined (explain):

3

D Yes 1:8:1 No

Reference 22 Page 15

1. Do the facility's SIC codes require application for Rule 6 permit coverage pursuant to 327 lAC 15-6 (Storm Water Associated With Industrial Activity)?

If YES, specify: A) Has the facility applied for Rule 6 permit coverage? B) Has the facility prepared and fully implemented a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ursuant to Rule 6?

2. Does the facility have any ongoing or proposed land disturbing activities greater than five (5) acres?

If YES, specify:

D Yes

D Yes

D Yes

D Yes

A) Has the facility applied for Rule 5 permit coverage under 327 lAC 15-5 D yes (Storm Water Associated with Construction Activity)? B) Were any signs of erosion into waters of the state from construction sites observed? D Yes

~

D D

D

D 3. Describe the general appearance of any observed discharge of wastewater or storm water from discharge pipes.

A) Outfalls observed? D Yes D If YES, note any discharges with foam, oily sheen, solids and floatables, color or odor:

DOCUMENT WITH A PHOTOGRAPH

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

4. Does the facility have any industrial materials and/or activities exposed to storm water? D Yes ~ No If YE note outdoor materials and/or activities observed:

!. , . . .·· .. ,· < ..... · . . ~~E~~~~~~:r~~~I{N~~a!w~«F~~~o~sr~~,~~~~~~~t:'ir ~p ~ ·· :o6~e:rva~ions for.thfs s~ctio•f.oi4NI~*'s~cr~e·ning:clle'c~usljcom·pleteH'f·\\'·' :, · , . D 'Tiiis ~ection1ofMM!r~ci~enirig'fclleCimitc'q\t co~pJete&13).. . s,. ~*'/~>· ·. . :· I '

D 'Refer to regular1~ingle7m~:<Ii~+inspC'ction'.rep~ort otJiiiltp~ctf()n;s~rl;i.IIJary lette,r~·:·f> ;,~r. :. -·y;.«,l~''"' A '<, ,",',_,";i\· ,''·'·,,·,~~:,, ,';"~;, ::(.::_) < -~~;;~- •":ttL- :.,<.:~;,·,,'J."'•".i::-:\<·~ --;-.' ;?;«<<'~ J}<_,.;y,·'L._.-;0--~-- ''<'

1. Is the facility's drinking water (drinking water, showers, cafeteria, etc.) supplied by a municipal (public or private) water system? ~ Yes D No

A) If NO, does the facility have its own drinking water system for employees (drinking water, showers, cafeteria, etc.)? D D Yes No

Explain: B) If answer to l.A) is YES, is the source of the water supply surface water or ground water?

D Surface Water D Ground Water

C) What is the number of employees at the facility?

D) If more than 25 employees, does the facility have a PWSID#? D Yes D No If YES, specify PWSID#:

2. If the facility is a public water supply and has a PWSID#, is the well D head on-site?

A) If YES, was the well head area observed? D B) If answer to 2.A) is YES, was the area within a 200 foot radius of D

the well head free of visible contamination sources? C) If answer to 2.B) is NO, please describe: DOCUMENT WITH A PHOTOGRAPH

4

Yes D No

Yes D No Yes D No

Reference 22 Page 16

1. EPA ID Number: 2. Was the accumulation of facility waste in units other than containers or tanks observed?

If YES, specify: A) How the waste is accumulated:

B) Waste description:

C) Source of the waste:

DOCUMENT WITH A PHOTOGRAPH

3. Were any containers and/or tanks that accumulate waste observed to be in poor condition?

If YES, please indicate: A) Tank or container:

B)Howmany:

C) Waste description:

D) Type of problem:

DOCUMENT WITH A PHOTOGRAPH

4. Was evidence observed ofwaste being released to the environment or disposed on-site? (Stained soil, dead vegetation, waste piles, excavations, etc.)

If YES, please indicate: A) Nature of evidence:

B) Waste description:

C) Source of the waste:

D) Dimensions of the area:

DOCUMENT WITH A PHOTOGRAPH

5. -Are there wastes the company cannot identify? If YES, please explain:

DOCUMENT WITH A PHOTOGRAPH

5

0 Yes 0 No

D Yes D No

D Yes D No

D Yes D No

Reference 22 Page 17

1. Are there any regulated underground storage tanks on-site? D Yes I:8J No

If YES, please indicate: A) How many:

B) Are they registered? D Yes D No If YES, list facility identification number:

C) List materials stored in the USTs:

2. Have there been any UST removals (closures)? D Yes I:8J No

If YES, when?

1. Does the facility submit Toxic Release Inventory Form R or Form A? D Yes I:8J No

A) If NO, does the facility's SIC code potentially require the facility to D Yes I:8J No report to TRI? B) If answer to l.A) is YES, does the facility have more than ten (10) full- D Yes D No time employees on an annual basis? C) If answer to l.B) If YES, does the facility manufacture, process, or use any TRI Listed Chemicals above established thresholds (i.e., 25,000 D Yes D No pounds/year for manufacture and process; 10,000 pounds/year for otherwise ?

6

Reference 22 Page 18IndiA Department of Environmental MaAement

•vERIFICATION OF INSPECTIO~

This is to verify that on ~ o-o 0 an inspection of ~ I hi 'r CJ e a nr£5 was conducted by the undersigne repre entative of the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Land Quality.

Type of Inspection:

V'complete Industrial/Hazardous Waste Inspection __ Limited Industrial/Hazardous Waste Inspection __ Industrial Waste Landfill Inspection

__ Complaint __ Multi-Media Screening Evaluation

Other _____ _

Inspection Findings:

V. In compliance, no violations observed.

__ In compliance, violations were observed but corrected during the inspection. See inspection report.

__ Violations were observed and require a submittal and/or follow-up inspection. See inspection report.

__ Violations were observed and are being referred to our Office of Enforcement. See inspection report.

__ Additional information/review is required to evaluate overall compliance.

Other ______________________ __

Multi-Media Screening Checklist Finding:

/'~o potential problems or areas of possible non-compliance were observed and noted on the multi-media screening checklist. __ Potential problems or areas of possible non-compliance were observed and noted on the multi-media screening checklist, but

corrected during the inspection. Refer to the final single-media inspection report and multi-media screening checklist. __ Potential problems or areas of possible non-compliance were observed and noted on the multi-media screening checklist, and

will be referred to the Office(s) of for further investigation and response. Refer to the final single-media inspection report and multi-media screening checklist.

If non-compliance is determined or additional information/review is required to evaluate overall compliance, the Office(s) of will be the lead IDEM Office(s) in pursuing these matters.

Pollution Prevention:

Pollution prevention is the preferred means of environmental protection in Indiana. The goal of pollution prevention is to promote changes in business and commercial operation, especially manufacturing processes, so that less environmental wastes are generated. Your participation in Indiana's pollution prevention program is entirely voluntary. Would your company like to be contacted by IDEM's Office ofPollution Prevention and Technical Assistance? _LYes __ No

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

A summary of violations and concerns noted during the inspection were verbally communicated to the undersigned company representative during the inspection. The company is encouraged to correct any deficiencies noted as soon as possible. Corrections made and verified during the inspection may still be cited as violations; however, prompt action may be taken into consideration in determining the resolution to any enforcement action, which may be taken.

__ Written report provided at the conclusion of the inspection. ~ritten report will be provided within 45 days.

Phone Number

3/l- 5o~- 311 Com resentative:

Phone Number

·"31 7 · (0 g l9 -1 Bwo Ownershi

VJ,