semiochemical “control” for bark...

26
Christopher J. Fettig 1 , Leif A. Mortenson 1 , Robert A. Progar 1 , A. Steven Munson 2 , Beverly M. Bulaon 2 , Daniel R. Cluck 2 , Monica L. Gaylord 2 , Sandra Kegley 2 , Cynthia L. Snyder 2 , Lia Spiegel 2 , Brytten E. Steed 2 , and Agenor Mafra-Neto 3 1 Research and Development, USDA Forest Service 2 Forest Health Protection, USDA Forest Service 3 ISCA Technologies Inc. California Forest Pest Council McClellan, CA, 2015 SPLAT ® Verb: A New Player in the Field of Semiochemical “Control” for Bark Beetles

Upload: others

Post on 27-Sep-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Semiochemical “Control” for Bark Beetlescaforestpestcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/2015-CFPC-11.4.15-Fettig.pdfSPLAT® Verb – Zone of Inhibition (Lodgepole, UT, 2013)

Christopher J. Fettig1, Leif A. Mortenson1, Robert A. Progar1, A. Steven Munson2, Beverly M. Bulaon2, Daniel R. Cluck2, Monica L.

Gaylord2, Sandra Kegley2, Cynthia L. Snyder2, Lia Spiegel2, Brytten E. Steed2, and Agenor Mafra-Neto3

1Research and Development, USDA Forest Service 2Forest Health Protection, USDA Forest Service

3ISCA Technologies Inc.

California Forest Pest Council McClellan, CA, 2015

SPLAT® Verb: A New Player in the Field of Semiochemical “Control” for Bark Beetles

Page 2: Semiochemical “Control” for Bark Beetlescaforestpestcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/2015-CFPC-11.4.15-Fettig.pdfSPLAT® Verb – Zone of Inhibition (Lodgepole, UT, 2013)

A “matrix-type” diffusion controlled-release device. As such, the release of active ingredients is determined by Fick’s First Law of Diffusion, which states that molecules move from regions of high concentration to regions of low concentration at a rate that is directly proportional to its concentration gradient.

Biodegradable. Inerts have been determined by USEPA to be suitable

for food use. SPLAT products are certified for organic use.

Specialized Pheromone & Lure Application Technology

Page 3: Semiochemical “Control” for Bark Beetlescaforestpestcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/2015-CFPC-11.4.15-Fettig.pdfSPLAT® Verb – Zone of Inhibition (Lodgepole, UT, 2013)

Verbenone (4,6,6-trimethylbicyclo[3.1.1]hept-3-en-2-one)

Principle antiaggregant of several bark beetles. Produced in small amounts by autoxidation of the monoterpene α-pinene, but primarily through metabolic conversion by bark beetles of inhaled and ingested α-pinene to cis- and trans-verbenol, which are metabolized by yeasts in the alimentary system and beetle galleries to verbenone (Progar et al. 2014). Inhibits additional beetles from infesting the target tree, presumably limiting the number of beetles to a density that increases the likelihood of brood survival.

C. F

ett

ig, U

SD

A F

orest

Serv

ice

A 5-g pouch was first registered by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 1999 for southern pine beetle.

Page 4: Semiochemical “Control” for Bark Beetlescaforestpestcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/2015-CFPC-11.4.15-Fettig.pdfSPLAT® Verb – Zone of Inhibition (Lodgepole, UT, 2013)
Page 5: Semiochemical “Control” for Bark Beetlescaforestpestcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/2015-CFPC-11.4.15-Fettig.pdfSPLAT® Verb – Zone of Inhibition (Lodgepole, UT, 2013)

Mountain Pine Beetle (MPB)

• Throughout BC, AB, most of the western U.S., and northern Mexico.

• Primary hosts are pines, most notably lodgepole, ponderosa, sugar, and whitebark. • Recent outbreaks have been severe, long-lasting and well-documented. • >27 million ha affected; >11 smallest U.S. states (≥SC) combined.

C. Fettig, USDA Forest Service

Page 6: Semiochemical “Control” for Bark Beetlescaforestpestcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/2015-CFPC-11.4.15-Fettig.pdfSPLAT® Verb – Zone of Inhibition (Lodgepole, UT, 2013)

Prototype 1 – Individual Tree (Lodgepole, WY, 2011)

• 21 PICO treated with SPLAT® formulated with (−)-verbenone by applying four equally-sized dollops to the tree bole at ~3 m in height with a pneumatic system. • 15 PICO (26.2 ± 1.3 cm) received 32 g of (−)-verbenone tree−1 (533 g of SPLAT® Verb tree−1) • 6 PICO (26.4 ± 2.3 cm) received 39.3 g of (−)-verbenone tree−1 (655 g of SPLAT® Verb tree−1). • 30 PICO (32.0 ± 0.8 cm) served as untreated controls.

C. F

ett

ig, U

SD

A F

orest

Serv

ice

SPLAT® is biologically inert and biodegradable. All trees baited with exo-brevicomin and trans-verbenol.

Page 7: Semiochemical “Control” for Bark Beetlescaforestpestcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/2015-CFPC-11.4.15-Fettig.pdfSPLAT® Verb – Zone of Inhibition (Lodgepole, UT, 2013)

A. M

afra

-Neto

, IS

CA

Tech

nolo

gies

Inc.

Page 8: Semiochemical “Control” for Bark Beetlescaforestpestcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/2015-CFPC-11.4.15-Fettig.pdfSPLAT® Verb – Zone of Inhibition (Lodgepole, UT, 2013)

Prototype 1 – Individual Tree (Lodgepole, MT, 2011)

B. Steed, USDA Forest Service

Page 9: Semiochemical “Control” for Bark Beetlescaforestpestcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/2015-CFPC-11.4.15-Fettig.pdfSPLAT® Verb – Zone of Inhibition (Lodgepole, UT, 2013)

Prototype 2 – Individual Tree (Lodgepole, WY, 2012)

• 30 PICO (27.1 ± 0.8 cm) treated with SPLAT® Verb applied at 7.0 g of (−)-verbenone/tree (70 g of SPLAT® Verb/tree) as 4 ~17.5-g dollops (~5.5 cm diam. X 1.2 cm ht.) to the tree bole (at cardinal directions) with a caulking gun. • 30 PICO (32.3 ± 1.2 cm) served as untreated controls.

A. M

afra

-Neto

, IS

CA

Tec

hno

logi

es

Inc.

Page 10: Semiochemical “Control” for Bark Beetlescaforestpestcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/2015-CFPC-11.4.15-Fettig.pdfSPLAT® Verb – Zone of Inhibition (Lodgepole, UT, 2013)

Prototype 2 – Individual Tree (Lodgepole, MT, 2012)

Fettig, C.J. et al. 2015. J Econ Entomol 108:173–182. .

Page 11: Semiochemical “Control” for Bark Beetlescaforestpestcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/2015-CFPC-11.4.15-Fettig.pdfSPLAT® Verb – Zone of Inhibition (Lodgepole, UT, 2013)

SPLAT® Verb – Individual Tree (Lodgepole, MT, 2013)

Fettig, C.J. et al. 2015. Crop Protection, in review.

C. Fettig, USDA Forest Service

Page 12: Semiochemical “Control” for Bark Beetlescaforestpestcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/2015-CFPC-11.4.15-Fettig.pdfSPLAT® Verb – Zone of Inhibition (Lodgepole, UT, 2013)

Prototype 2 – Area Wide (Lodgepole, ID, 2012)

• SPLAT® Verb was applied at 350.0 g of (−)-verbenone/plot to tree boles (both host and nonhosts) at ~2 m in height on the northern aspect in appropriate dollop sizes (~17.5 g) to achieve adequate (~5−6 m, depending on tree distributions) coverage. • 7-g (−)-verbenone pouches stapled to the tree bole at ~2 m in height on the northern aspect along a ~9.1 by 9.1-m grid (125 U/ha; 350.0 g of (−)-verbenone/plot) • Untreated control.

C. Fettig, USDA Forest Service

Page 13: Semiochemical “Control” for Bark Beetlescaforestpestcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/2015-CFPC-11.4.15-Fettig.pdfSPLAT® Verb – Zone of Inhibition (Lodgepole, UT, 2013)

Prototype 2 – Area Wide (Lodgepole, ID, 2012)

Fettig, C.J. et al. 2015. J Econ Entomol 108:173–182. .

Page 14: Semiochemical “Control” for Bark Beetlescaforestpestcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/2015-CFPC-11.4.15-Fettig.pdfSPLAT® Verb – Zone of Inhibition (Lodgepole, UT, 2013)

Fettig, C.J. et al. 2015. J Econ Entomol 108:173–182. .

Page 15: Semiochemical “Control” for Bark Beetlescaforestpestcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/2015-CFPC-11.4.15-Fettig.pdfSPLAT® Verb – Zone of Inhibition (Lodgepole, UT, 2013)

SPLAT® Verb – Zone of Inhibition (Lodgepole, UT, 2013)

• Seventy g of SPLAT® Verb [7 g of (−)-verbenone] were applied as four ~17.5-g dollops at ~2.5 m in height to the bole of one PICO (mean dbh ± SEM = 36.7 ± 1.2 cm) at the center of each of eight blocks. • One 16-unit multiple-funnel trap baited with a commercially-available trap lure was placed at 1, 2, 4, 8 and 16 m from the SPLAT® Verb-treated tree at a randomly-selected bearing of 0, 72, 144, 216 or 288º.

C. F

ett

ig, U

SD

A F

orest

Serv

ice

Page 16: Semiochemical “Control” for Bark Beetlescaforestpestcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/2015-CFPC-11.4.15-Fettig.pdfSPLAT® Verb – Zone of Inhibition (Lodgepole, UT, 2013)

There was no significant distance X gender interaction (P = 0.46), and therefore results relate equally to both male and female responses. This is of practical importance as females initiate host selection and therefore inhibition of females is critical to preventing colonization and tree mortality. No differences were observed among captures at 1, 2 or 4 m from the point of release of SPLAT® Verb, but significantly fewer MPB were collected at 1 and 2 m compared to 8 m.

Fett

ig, C

.J. et

al. 2

015

. J

Eco

n E

ntom

ol 1

08

:17

3–1

82

. .

Page 17: Semiochemical “Control” for Bark Beetlescaforestpestcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/2015-CFPC-11.4.15-Fettig.pdfSPLAT® Verb – Zone of Inhibition (Lodgepole, UT, 2013)

Individual Tree (Lodgepole, WY, 2012)

Significantly fewer PICO (percentage of trees) were killed on 0.041-ha circular plots surrounding PICO treated with SPLAT® Verb compared to the untreated control, suggesting attraction was disrupted at levels sufficient to cause tree protection within 11 m of the point of release of SPLAT® Verb.

Fett

ig, C

.J. et

al. 2

015

. J

Eco

n E

ntom

ol 1

08

:17

3–1

82

. .

B. Steed, USDA Forest Service

Page 18: Semiochemical “Control” for Bark Beetlescaforestpestcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/2015-CFPC-11.4.15-Fettig.pdfSPLAT® Verb – Zone of Inhibition (Lodgepole, UT, 2013)

SPLAT® Verb - Chemical Composition

• 17.5 g dollops were analyzed by gas chromatography (GC) to estimate release rates, and GC and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) to determine chemical identity and composition.

• Average release during a 30-d

period was 28.6 mg/d. Assuming release plateaus at ~15 mg/d (i.e., mean release was 14.7 mg/d for days 10–30) and continues at this rate the reservoir of verbenone would be sufficient to cover most of the flight activity period.

• Only after dollops were aged for >12

mo were trace amounts of chrysanthenone found. C. Fettig, USDA Forest Service

Fettig, C.J. et al. 2015. J Econ Entomol 108:173–182. .

Page 19: Semiochemical “Control” for Bark Beetlescaforestpestcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/2015-CFPC-11.4.15-Fettig.pdfSPLAT® Verb – Zone of Inhibition (Lodgepole, UT, 2013)

SPLAT® Verb – Individual Tree (Lodgepole, MT, 2014)

Fettig, C.J. et al. unpubl.

Page 20: Semiochemical “Control” for Bark Beetlescaforestpestcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/2015-CFPC-11.4.15-Fettig.pdfSPLAT® Verb – Zone of Inhibition (Lodgepole, UT, 2013)

SPLAT® Verb – Area Wide (Lodgepole, MT, 2014)

B. Steed, USDA Forest Service

Page 21: Semiochemical “Control” for Bark Beetlescaforestpestcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/2015-CFPC-11.4.15-Fettig.pdfSPLAT® Verb – Zone of Inhibition (Lodgepole, UT, 2013)

SPLAT® Verb – Diffuse/Chemical Composition (7.5 g, 12.5 g, 17.5 g, 35 g, @ three elevations, 2015)

R. Progar, USDA Forest Service

Gas chromatography to estimate release rates, and GC-MS to determine chemical identity and composition

Page 22: Semiochemical “Control” for Bark Beetlescaforestpestcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/2015-CFPC-11.4.15-Fettig.pdfSPLAT® Verb – Zone of Inhibition (Lodgepole, UT, 2013)

SPLAT® Verb – Individual Tree (Sugar pine, CA, 2014)

Fettig, C.J. et al. 2015. Crop Protection, in review.

Page 23: Semiochemical “Control” for Bark Beetlescaforestpestcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/2015-CFPC-11.4.15-Fettig.pdfSPLAT® Verb – Zone of Inhibition (Lodgepole, UT, 2013)

Rim Fire: treated 86 trees (121.9 ± 4.3 cm dbh, max = 223.1 cm) w/ 10.0 g a.i.

Page 24: Semiochemical “Control” for Bark Beetlescaforestpestcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/2015-CFPC-11.4.15-Fettig.pdfSPLAT® Verb – Zone of Inhibition (Lodgepole, UT, 2013)

SPLAT® Verb – Five-needle Pines (Whitebark, CA, OR and MT, 2015)

(SWWP, AZ, 2015)

R. Progar, USDA Forest Service

C. Fettig, USDA Forest Service R. Progar, USDA Forest Service

Page 25: Semiochemical “Control” for Bark Beetlescaforestpestcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/2015-CFPC-11.4.15-Fettig.pdfSPLAT® Verb – Zone of Inhibition (Lodgepole, UT, 2013)

“SPLAT® Verb Plus” (Ponderosa, CA and OR, 2014)

Fett

ig, C

.J. et

al. un

publ.

Page 26: Semiochemical “Control” for Bark Beetlescaforestpestcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/2015-CFPC-11.4.15-Fettig.pdfSPLAT® Verb – Zone of Inhibition (Lodgepole, UT, 2013)

Christopher J. Fettig [email protected]

Fettig, C.J., A.S. Munson, M. Reinke, and A. Mafra-Neto. 2015. A novel semiochemical tool for protecting lodgepole pine from mortality attributed to mountain pine beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). J Econ Entomol 108:173–182. Fettig, C.J., B.E. Steed, B.M. Bulaon, R.A. Progar, A.S. Munson, and A. Mafra-Neto. 2015. The efficacy of SPLAT® Verb for protecting individual Pinus contorta, Pinus ponderosa, and Pinus lambertiana from colonization by Dendroctonus ponderosae. Crop Protection, in review. Mafra-Neto, A., F.M. de Lame, C.J. Fettig et al. 2013. Manipulation of insect behavior with Specialized Pheromone & Lure Application Technology (SPLAT®). Natural Products for Pest Management. ACS Publications, Washington, p. 31–58. Mafra-Neto, A., C.J. Fettig, A.S. Munson, and L.L. Stelinski. 2014. The use of repellents formulated in Specialized Pheromone and Lure Application Technology (SPLAT®) for effective insect pest management. Insect Repellents Handbook, Second Edition. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, p. 291–314. Mafra-Neto, A., C.J. Fettig, A.S. Munson, et al. 2015. Development of specialized pheromone and lure application technologies (SPLAT®) for management of coleopteran pests in agricultural and forest systems. Biopesticides: State of the Art and Future Opportunities. ACS Publications, Washington, p. 211-242.

C. Fettig, USDA Forest Service