Seekyt changing revenue sharing rules

Irene said:

I just don't obtain it why these people insist which the one that should obtain compensated a lotmore may become the individual who spends a shorter period working plus more occasion"networking". Just Like creating "OMGAWD Ihttp://www.getjealous.com/decisivephobia178/journal/3153945/the-key-reasons-why-you-should-consider.html loved the article" 50 occasions can be likely to assist Seekyt help make much more money.

They ought to encourage individuals to generate external traffic, which could be the actual trafficthat will click on ads as well as amke these money.

Hi Irene,

I just wanted to consider this chance to clarify about Seekyt's ambitions since this really is certainly1 of the initial forum threads about the subject.Â

If the user did absolutely nothing on Seekyt except write articles, they can increase their incomesharing score through an additional 35%. When their articles are really, really good, people followsthem. This may add approximately 6% with their score. Remarks add an additional 2%. Referralsmay add one more 6%. This indicates 85% of the income reveal is actually awarded pertaining toarticles, and in addition the remaining 14% can be reliant on your abilities to draw in followers.Comments, referrals, followers and more most use a monetary value for you to me. They Willcontribute to the general profitability associated with any offered user's articles.Â

People that just follow a ton of people in Seekyt don't typicallyhttp://apps.irs.gov/app/understandingTaxes/index.jsp get your self a lot of followers within return.That functions just like Digg.com or even Twitter.com - should you want more followers, you've inorder to create better articles.Â

A individual that has written 500+ articles and contains simply no followers or even offers left zerocomments probably includes a pretty stale library associated with content. a person together withten articles along with 200 followers probably writes killer content material all the time. That Willperson deserves a new reward. This specific is the logic I'm utilizing for most of the actual revenuesharing bonuses.Â

I am not in all intending to influence individuals to not necessarily use our site regarding producingcontent. in fact, I'm hoping to influence people to submit much more compared to end up being ableto they ever have. The Majority Of members who're regular authors tend to be obtaining the decentboost inside their revenue discuss from this change.Â

I hope this clears up the particular confusion.Â

http://www.infobarrel.com/forum-topic.php?id=10484