scopus, sciencedirect and mendeley

46
| 1 Elizabeth Dyas Senior Product Marketing Manager, Scopus Scopus, ScienceDirect and Mendeley June 12, 2014

Upload: nulibrary

Post on 06-May-2015

444 views

Category:

Education


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Scopus, ScienceDirect and Mendeley

| 1

Elizabeth Dyas

Senior Product Marketing Manager, Scopus

Scopus, ScienceDirect and Mendeley

June 12, 2014

Page 2: Scopus, ScienceDirect and Mendeley

| 2

Agenda of the Scopus presentation

• Scopus content coverage

• Scopus coverage of Kazakhstan content

• How does Scopus select journal content?

• How does Scopus select non-serial content (books and conferences)

• What content expansion programs are ongoing?

• What features are new in Scopus?

Page 3: Scopus, ScienceDirect and Mendeley

| 3

Elsevier helps support the research cycle that turns research into knowledge and innovation

Input(Usage &

application)

Process

Discover/Read

Cite/Share

Scientific Outputs

Disseminate

Direct Outcomes

Get Read

Get Cited

Page 4: Scopus, ScienceDirect and Mendeley

| 4

Scopus content coverage

Page 5: Scopus, ScienceDirect and Mendeley

| 5

What content does Scopus include?

Scopus is ideal compared to other products because it has the broadest coverage of global, curated, relevant research, with smart, simple tools to help track, analyze and visualize research.

53.3M records from 21,912 serial titles and 36,000 books21.3M pre 1996 records | 32.0M post 1995 records

• Content from > 5,000 publishers• “Articles in Press” from > 3,750 titles• Titles from 105 different countries in all

geographical regions• 40 “local” languages covered• More than 2,800 Gold Open Access journals

indexed

Page 6: Scopus, ScienceDirect and Mendeley

| 6

Scopus covers different source types for a reason

JOURNALS

• Timely• Peer-reviewed

(formal research)

CONFERENCES

• Preliminary research (can be a bit less formal)

• Newer ideas

BOOKS

• Thorough analysis of a specific topic

All subject fields, but typical fields with high

ratio of journal publication: chemical,

biological, health sciences etc.

Mainly of importance in Computer Science and

Engineering-related subject fields

Mainly of importance in Social Sciences and the

Arts & Humanities

Different source types are added to ensure that coverage, discoverability, profiles and impact measurement for research in all subject fields is accounted for in Scopus.

Page 7: Scopus, ScienceDirect and Mendeley

| 7

CONFERENCES

17k events5.5M records (10%)

Conf. expansion:1,000 conferences6,000 conf. events400k conf. papers5M citations

Mainly Engineering and Physical Sciences

BOOKS

421 book series- 28K Volumes- 925K items

34,485 books- 356K items

Books expansion:75K books by 2015- Focus on Social Sciences and A&H

PATENTS

24M patents from 5 major patent offices

JOURNALS

20,874 peer-reviewed journals367 trade journals

- Full metadata, abstracts and cited references (pre-1996)- >2,800 fully Open Access titles- Going back to 1823- Funding data from acknowledgements

Physical Sciences6,600

Health Sciences6,300

SocialSciences6,350

LifeSciences4,050

What content does Scopus include?

Page 8: Scopus, ScienceDirect and Mendeley

| 8

Scopus article growth over last 10 years

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

500,000

1,000,000

1,500,000

2,000,000

2,500,000

3,000,000

3,500,000

Physical Sciences Health Sciences Life Sciences Social Sciences

Page 9: Scopus, ScienceDirect and Mendeley

| 9

Ratio of journals per Publisher in Scopus10%

8%

5%

5%

2%

1%

1%

1%

1%

1%

1%

1%1%1%

Other60%

Source: Scopus title list (May 2014)

Page 10: Scopus, ScienceDirect and Mendeley

| 10

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 20140

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

1,800

Documents

432 445 549

812

Documents with Kazakhstan country affil. 2009–2013

214 active journals from Russia in Scopus.+ 118 Russian titles published by international publishers (332 active titles total)

Kazakh coverage in Scopus

Source: Scopus data ,10 June 2014

1 active journal from Kazakhstan in Scopus.

Eurasian Chemico-Technological Journal (since 2007)

1,654

848

Page 11: Scopus, ScienceDirect and Mendeley

| 11

11

Subject areas of Kazakhstan documents

Page 12: Scopus, ScienceDirect and Mendeley

| 12

Comparison with nearest peer

Scopus24,169

Web of Science12,491

Scopus7,410 (+78%)

WoS4,188

Scopus6,740 (+97%)

WoS3,415

Scopus4,436 (+50%)

WoS2,954

Scopus7,684 (+90%)

WoS4,016

Physical Sciences Health Sciences Life Sciences Social Sciences

~12K titles

~3,300 publishers

Updated weekly

~24K titles

>5,000 publishers

Updated daily

Source: Web of Science Real Facts, Web of Science title list and Scopus’ own data (April 2014)

Page 13: Scopus, ScienceDirect and Mendeley

| 13

Facts about Scopus and Web of Science

~12 thousand titles

54 million records*

3,300 publishers*

“100 years of abstracts”*

6.5 million conference records*

760 million+ cited references*

Updated weekly

Since 1955*

More than 5,600 customers*

~24thousand titles

53 million records

>5,000 publishers

Going back to 1823

5.5 million conference records

700(?) million+ cited references

Updated daily

Since 2004

Around 3,000 customers

* Source: Web of Science Real Facts, Scopus Data

Page 14: Scopus, ScienceDirect and Mendeley

| 14

How does Scopus select journals?

Page 15: Scopus, ScienceDirect and Mendeley

| 15

How does Scopus select serial content?

• Titles are selected by the independent Content Selection & Advisory Board (CSAB)

• The CSAB is chosen for their expertise in specific subject areas; many will have previously been (journal) Editors

Focus on quality through content selection by the independent CSAB, because:

• Provide accurate and relevant search results for users• No dilution of search results by irrelevant or low quality content• Support that Scopus is recognized as authoritative• Support confidence that Scopus “reflects the truth”

Page 16: Scopus, ScienceDirect and Mendeley

| 16Transparent title evaluation process by an independent Content Selection & Advisory Board

Publisher or Editor

Suggest title

Check Min. criteria

“Enrich” titles

Review titles

CSAB

Externalreviewer

and make decision

Continuous review process using online Scopus Title Evaluation Platform (STEP)Online suggestion form: http://suggestor.step.scopus.com/index.cfm

Page 17: Scopus, ScienceDirect and Mendeley

| 17

Peer-review English abstracts

Regular publication

Roman script references

Pub. ethics statement

How does Scopus select serial content?

Journal Policy Quality of Content Journal Standing Regularity Online Availability

All titles should meet all minimum criteria in order to be considered for Scopus review:

Eligible titles are reviewed by the Content Selection & Advisory Board according to a combination of 14 quantitative and qualitative selection criteria:

• Convincing editorial concept/policy

• Type of peer-review

• Diversity geographic distribution of editors

• Diversity geographic distribution of authors

• Academic contribution to the field

• Clarity of abstracts

• Quality and conformity with stated aims & scope

• Readability of articles

• Citedness of journal articles in Scopus

• Editor standing

• No delay in publication schedule

• Content available online

• English-language journal home page

• Quality of home page

Info: http://www.elsevier.com/online-tools/scopus/content-overview Questions: [email protected]

Page 18: Scopus, ScienceDirect and Mendeley

| 18

How does Scopus select non-serial content?

Page 19: Scopus, ScienceDirect and Mendeley

| 19

Selection of non-serial Book and Conference contentBooksBook selection is via a publisher-based approach (no individual suggestions accepted). All books from selected publishers deemed “in scope” will be selected for coverage. Priority and selection of publisher’s book lists depends on:• Reputation and impact of the publisher• Size and subject area of the books list• Availability and format of the book content• Publication policy and editorial mission• Quality of published book content

ConferencesEngineering related conferences 2005 going forward included on various vetted lists (no individual suggestions accepted). • Australian Research Council: ARC-A, ARC-B • “MIT” Conferences• DBLP Computer Science Bibliography (orig. db logic program bibliography)• Microsoft Academic Science – Computer Science, Engineering• INSPIRES – high-energy physics (Stanford)• Web of Science – selected engineering-focused/related• OnePetro – Oil & Gas industries (society conferences from API, SPE, NACE, SEG, etc.)• OneMine – mining and minerals (society conferences from SME, TMS, AIME, AusIMM, ...)

Page 20: Scopus, ScienceDirect and Mendeley

| 20

What content expansion projects are ongoing?

Page 21: Scopus, ScienceDirect and Mendeley

| 21

Conference Expansion ProgramA special project, designed to ensure Scopus (and Compendex) customers have access to highly regarded conferences from specific respected/authoritative lists of conferences held worldwide.

Coverage years

• Backfill from 2005 – 2012 (8 years)

Number of conferences

• Around 1,000 new conference titles, 6,000 conference events, 400K conference papers and 5M references

Which conferences

• Serial and one-off conferences from authoritative, respected lists. Focus on engineering and engineering-related subject fields

Project started in

2011

Expected project end date: June

2014

Titles pro-

cessed 832

In process;

143

Waiting for permission

384

No permission, 194

Page 22: Scopus, ScienceDirect and Mendeley

| 22

Books expansion program

Coverage years

• Back to 2005 (2003 for A&H)

Number of books

• 75,000 over three years; 10,000 each year thereafter

Book types

• Monographs, edited volumes, major reference works, graduate level text books

All chapter titles and links

Book title Chapter title

Abstract Citation count

May-1

3

Jul-1

3

Sep-

13

Nov-1

3

Jan-

14

Mar-1

4

May-1

4

Jul-1

4

Sep-

14

Nov-1

40

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,000

Already in Scopus:

Elsevier, Springer, Wiley, Brill, De Gruyter, Woodhead, Karger, Oxford University Press, Edward Elgar, Maney, Intellect, IOS Press, Pan Stanford, University of California Press, Princeton University Press, Edinburgh University Press, Delft University Press, Duke University Press, McGill Queens University Press, Project Muse (60+ UPs), OECD and more…

Books target in Scopus

Actual books in Scopus

Metadata

Author data

(plus ~28K book Volumes from series)

Cited references

Page 23: Scopus, ScienceDirect and Mendeley

| 23

Scopus cited references expansion program

Scopus will add cited references to 8 Million pre-1996 articles going back to 1970.

Page 24: Scopus, ScienceDirect and Mendeley

| 24

Why?- Improve the completeness and coverage of back files in Scopus- Enhance the relevancy and visibility of archival content in Scopus- Measure the impact of pre-1996 – for both individual assessment and (historical) trend analysis.- Increase the accuracy of Scopus Author Profiles for older researchers and decision makers.

Pre-1996 cited references expansion program

Coverage years

• Pre-1996, going back to 1970

Number of articles

• We estimate 8M+ articles will be (re-) processed to include cited references

Which Archives

• Archives from all major publishers that have digital archives available

• All subject areas included

What?

Development of required systems

and processes has already started

The first content with pre-1996

cited references will be visible in

Q4 2014

Completed by 2016 when >8M articles

from all major publishers have been

loaded

When?

Page 25: Scopus, ScienceDirect and Mendeley

| 25January 2014, redesign of Author Profiles

Page 26: Scopus, ScienceDirect and Mendeley

| 26May 2014, redesign of Author Profiles

Page 27: Scopus, ScienceDirect and Mendeley

| 27

Summary

Scopus has broad coverage providing the most accurate view of the global research landscape.

Scopus has a transparent content selection process executed by the independent Scopus Content Selection & Advisory Board.

Scopus is flexible and we work with you and the research community to ensure that most relevant sources are covered.

Scopus is working on content expansion programs to ensure that coverage, discoverability, profiles and impact measurement for research in all subject fields is accounted for in Scopus.

Page 28: Scopus, ScienceDirect and Mendeley

| 28

ScienceDirect

Page 29: Scopus, ScienceDirect and Mendeley

| 29

Agenda of the ScienceDirect presentation

• What problems do researchers have and how does ScienceDirect help?

• What are some features in ScienceDirect to be aware of?

• ScienceDirect mobile article page

Page 30: Scopus, ScienceDirect and Mendeley

| 30

Which broad research problems does ScienceDirect

address?

Page 31: Scopus, ScienceDirect and Mendeley

| 31

Problem area 1: reducing the amount of time spent finding and consuming relevant research

Average time spent searching for

research information per week:

3 hours 6 minutes

Average time spent reading research articles per week:

4 hours 39 minutes

Average number of research articles

read per week: 5.1 articles

• Indexing agreements with all relevant web search engines, A&I DBs and knowledge platforms

• Customer holding information• Access options• Scopus citation• Author information • Article recommender

• Interactive and highly structured article (outline), workspace

• Optimised article layout incl. article outline• Unique content enrichments such as rich

visualization tools, interactive data viewers, audio commentaries, and executable papers

• Links to Data sets and supplementary content

Page 32: Scopus, ScienceDirect and Mendeley

| 32

Problem area 2: keeping up to date with information & developments in my field

Project set-up; 10%

Authoring; 44%

Extend knowledge;

8%

Keeping up to date;

21%

General; 17%

Thinking about the last time that you searched for or accessed information related to research, what was the main reason for conducting the search?

Page 33: Scopus, ScienceDirect and Mendeley

| 33

Problem area 3: finding the relevant research at the right time

Compared to 5 years ago I now spend more time reading and analyzing research articles rather than finding them

Se-ries1

14%

50%

22%

12%

1%

Strongly agree Agree Neither agree nor disagree Disagree Strongly disagree

Page 34: Scopus, ScienceDirect and Mendeley

| 34

Problem area 4: collaboration with other researchers

Other research we performed in August 2013 showed us that:Updates from colleagues on social networking websites offer a way to learn on a regular basis from people with similar interests and a similar background

• LinkedIn• Twitter• ResearchGate• Facebook

Page 35: Scopus, ScienceDirect and Mendeley

| 35

Let’s take a look at the product

And also review platform developments

Page 36: Scopus, ScienceDirect and Mendeley

| 36

Page 37: Scopus, ScienceDirect and Mendeley

| 37

Introducing the new ScienceDirect enhanced article page for mobile devices

• Friendly, inviting, hospitable• Focused, legible, clear• Fast, direct, intuitive

Page 38: Scopus, ScienceDirect and Mendeley

| 38

Some initial customer feedback

‘Showing the search results in this way certainly brings with it a lot of

additional value’

Professor Els Boshuizen, Open University of The Netherlands

Search results

Overall experience

Performance

Legibility

‘The response time is very good!’

Nynke Kramer, Universiteit Utrecht

‘Overall a very clear, pleasant experience! It reads like a book

on an eReader’

Katja J Teerds PhD, Associate Professor,

Wageningen University

‘The display is very readable, the font size makes for easy reading,

and the navigation buttons are simple to use!’

Nynke Kramer, Universiteit Utrecht

Page 39: Scopus, ScienceDirect and Mendeley

| 39

Mendeley

Page 40: Scopus, ScienceDirect and Mendeley

| 40

What is Mendeley?

Page 41: Scopus, ScienceDirect and Mendeley

| 41

41

Mendeley is a free reference manager and academic social network that can help organize your research, collaborate with others online, and discover the latest research.

• Automatically generate bibliographies• Collaborate easily with other researchers online• Easily import papers from other research software• Find relevant papers based on what you’re reading• Access your papers from anywhere online• Read papers on the go, with new iPhone app

www.mendeley.com

About Mendeley

Page 42: Scopus, ScienceDirect and Mendeley
Page 43: Scopus, ScienceDirect and Mendeley

Mendeley extracts data and fulltext from

PDFs, ..

..share and discuss their research in

groups, ..

..lets researchers organize and annotate

papers, ..

Page 44: Scopus, ScienceDirect and Mendeley

..and aggregates everything in the cloud

..share and discuss their research in

groups, ..

Page 45: Scopus, ScienceDirect and Mendeley

Reference manager

Research Database & API

Social Network &Groups

Enable Collaboration

Drive Productivity

Create Insight & Build Apps

Mendeley key components

Page 46: Scopus, ScienceDirect and Mendeley

| 46

www.elsevier.com/scopus

Thank you & Questions

http://blog.scopus.com/http://www.twitter.com/scopus http://blog.sciencedirect.comhttp://www.twitter.com/sciencedirect.com

Watch for more developments: