school finance update
DESCRIPTION
School Finance Update. South Plains TASBO February 12, 2008. 2007-08 Summary of Finances. Updated recently to reflect revised CPTD values received from the Comptroller’s office in December CPTD values changed due to property tax relief for over-65 folks (frozen levy) - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
School Finance Update
South Plains TASBOFebruary 12, 2008
2007-08 Summary of Finances Updated recently to reflect revised
CPTD values received from the Comptroller’s office in December
CPTD values changed due to property tax relief for over-65 folks (frozen levy)
Updated SOF only 1st step
2007-08 Summary of Finances Next step is to determine the amount of
frozen levy lost
Gain in state aid resulting from revised CPTD values will be measured against the loss
If gain does not offset loss, additional state aid will make up the difference (yet another “hold harmless”)
Not sure when all this will be completed
2007-08 Summary of Finances Other Changes
Tax rates updated Tax collections updated Comp Ed enrollments updates Target revenue has been adjusted to reflect
changes in Transportation and NIFA allotments from base year to 2007-08
EDA/IFA, charge for selling WADA, and gain from selling WADA also updated
2007-08 Summary of Finances Student counts (other than Comp Ed
enrollment) have not yet been updated
Will change DPE column probably in March
TEA will take historical ratio between PEIMS Fall enrollment and end-of-year ADA and apply ratio to this past PEIMS Fall enrollment
2008-09 Rollback Rate Lesser of:
1) ($1.50 x .6667) + $.04 = $1.04005 + any voter-approved pennies adopted in 2007-08; OR
2) Effective M&O Tax Rate + $.04
The 2 Additional “Golden” Pennies – Election Required??
Level 2 of Tier II applies to “…the first six cents by which the district’s maintenance and operations tax rate exceeds the rate equal to the product of the state compression percentage…multiplied by the maintenance and operations tax rate adopted by the district for the 2005 tax year;…”(TEC 42.302(a-1)(2))
The 2 Additional “Golden” Pennies – Election Required??
If district’s M&O rate was $1.50 in 2005-06, then election will (probably) be required
$1.50 x .6667 = $1.00005 compressed rate
Rollback rate would (in all probability) be $1.04005, so to get to $1.06005 (to get to the 2 “golden” pennies), you would need voter approval
The 2 Additional “Golden” Pennies – Election Required??
If district’s M&O rate was below $1.50 in 2005-06, then election may not be required
$1.45 x .6667 = $.9667 compressed rate
If Effective M&O Tax Rate is $1.03 and district adopts $1.03, then there would be $.0633 ($1.03 - $.9667 = $.0633) above the compressed rate...so you would get the 2 “golden” pennies without having to go to the voters
The 2 Additional “Golden” Pennies – Election Required??
The break point
2005-06 M&O Rate:$1.46 x .6667 = $.97338 + $.04 + $.02 = $1.03338$1.47 x .6667 = $.98005 + $.04 + $.02 = $1.04005$1.48 x .6667 = $.98672 + $.04 + $.02 = $1.04672$1.49 x .6667 = $.99338 + $.04 + $.02 = $1.05338$1.50 x .6667 = $1.0001 + $.04 + $.02 = $1.06010
2006-07 “Near Final” Data
73 districts have “S1” as greater of705 districts have “S2” as greater of248 districts have “S3” as greater of
Numbers may change when “final” 2006-07 SOFs are generated in March/April
“Greater of” amounts will change when “final” 2006-07 SOFs are generated in March/April
"Greater of" Revenue per WADA -- All Districts
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Average
New Equity Issue? Part of Supreme Court’s ruling from
Edgewood IV and TEC 42.001
“…substantially equal access to similar revenue per student at similar tax effort…”
The so-called “$600 gap” was deemed “substantially equal” by the Supreme Court
"Greater of" Revenue per WADA (Districts With 2005-06 M&O Tax Rates From $1.485 to $1.50)
(584 Districts)
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
"Greater of" Revenue per WADA (Ch 42 Districts With 2005-06 M&O Tax Rates From $1.485 to $1.50)
(505 Districts)
$4,003
$4,878 $4,775
$6,571
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
"Poorest"Ch 42 District
"Richest" Ch 42 District
Average Ch 42 District
Median Ch 42 District
"Greater of" Revenue per WADA (Ch 41 Districts With 2005-06 M&O Tax Rates From $1.485 to $1.50)
(75 Districts)
$4,768
$6,202$5,934
$9,235
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
10,000
"Poorest" Ch 41 District
Average Ch 41 District
"Richest" Ch 41 District
Median Ch 41 District
"Greater of" Revenue per WADA: Ch 42 & 41 Districts - Poorest to Richest (M&O Tax Rates
From $1.485 to $1.50)
$4,003$4,768
$6,571
$9,235
$0
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
$5,000
$6,000
$7,000
$8,000
$9,000
$10,000
1
Poorest Ch 42 District
Poorest Ch 41 District
Richest Ch 42 District
Richest Ch 41 District
New Equity Issue? The point of all the previous graphs is to
show that, up to the compressed rate, there might be a new equity issue that may have to be addressed
The Template Still on Release 2 of the 07-08/08-09
template
Should not be a multitude of releases this time around
New interpretations/rules would cause new versions to be released
A New “Alternative” Template An 8-Step Path to Enlightenment
Requires only 8 data entry items
The result should give the user a total state/local general revenue amount that is in the ballpark of the result using the regular template