satellite communication
DESCRIPTION
Satellite CommunicationTRANSCRIPT
Satellite CommunicationSatellite Communication
Lecturers:Morteza TahzibiAli Reza KataniAdvisor:Dr. Golestani
1
OverviewOverviewSatellite is a microwave repeater
in the space.There are about 750 satellite in
the space, most of them are used for communication.
They are:◦ Wide area coverage of the earth’s surface.◦ Transmission delay is about 0.3 sec.◦ Transmission cost is independent of
distance.
2
Satellite MissionsSatellite Missions
3
Satellite History CalendarSatellite History Calendar 1957
◦ October 4, 1957: - First satellite - the Russian Sputnik 01◦ First living creature in space: Sputnik 02
1958◦ First American satellite: Explorer 01◦ First telecommunication satellite: This satellite broadcast a taped message: Score
1959◦ First meteorology satellite: Explorer 07
1960◦ First successful passive satellite: Echo 1◦ First successful active satellite: Courier 1B◦ First NASA satellite: Explorer 08
April 12, 1961: - First man in space- Boctok voyager 1962
◦ First telephone communication & TV broadcast via satellite: Echo 1◦ First telecommunication satellite, first real-time active, AT&T: Telstar 1◦ First Canadian satellite: Alouette 1◦ On 7th June 1962 at 7:53p the two-stage rocket; Rehbar-I was successfully launched from Sonmiani Rocket Range. It
carried a payload of 80 pounds of sodium and soared to about 130 km into the atmosphere. With the launching of Rehbar-I, Pakistan had the honour of becoming the third country in Asia and the tenth in the world to conduct such a launching after USA, USSR, UK, France, Sweden, Italy, Canada, Japan and Israel.
◦ Rehbar-II followed a successful launch on 9th June 1962 1963
◦ Real-time active: Telstar 2 1964
◦ Creation of Intelsat◦ First geostationary satellite, second satellite in stationary orbit: Syncom 3◦ First Italian satellite: San Marco 1
4
Satellite History CalendarSatellite History Calendar 1965
◦ Intelsat 1 becomes first commercial comsat: Early Bird◦ First real-time active for USSR: Molniya 1A
1967◦ First geostationary meteorology payload: ATS 3
1968◦ First European satellite: ESRO 2B
July 21, 1969: - First man on the moon
1970◦ First Japanese satellite: Ohsumi◦ First Chinese satellite: Dong Fang Hong 01
1971◦ First UK launched satellite: Prospero◦ ITU-WARC for Space Telecommunications ◦ INTELSAT IV Launched ◦ INTERSPUTNIK - Soviet Union equivalent of INTELSAT formed
1974◦ First direct broadcasting satellite: ATS 6
1976 ◦ MARISAT - First civil maritime communications satellite service started
1977 ◦ EUTELSAT - European regional satellite ◦ ITU-WARC for Space Telecommunications in the Satellite Service
1979◦ Creation of Inmarsat
5
Satellite History CalendarSatellite History Calendar 1980
◦ INTELSAT V launched - 3 axis stabilized satellite built by Ford Aerospace 1983
◦ ECS (EUTELSAT 1) launched - built by European consortium supervised by ESA 1984
◦ UK's UNISAT TV DBS satellite project abandoned ◦ First satellite repaired in orbit by the shuttle: SMM
1985◦ First Brazilian satellite: Brazilsat A1◦ First Mexican satellite: Morelos 1
1988◦ First Luxemburg satellite: Astra 1A
1989 ◦ INTELSAT VI - one of the last big "spinners" built by Hughes◦ Creation of Panamasat - Begins Service
1990 ◦ IRIDIUM, TRITIUM, ODYSSEY and GLOBALSTAR S-PCN projects proposed - CDMA designs more popular ◦ EUTELSAT II
1992 ◦ OLYMPUS finally launched - large European development satellite with Ka-band, DBTV and Ku-band
SS/TDMA payloads - fails within 3 years 1993
◦ INMARSAT II - 39 dBW EIRP global beam mobile satellite - built by Hughes/British Aerospace 1994
◦ INTELSAT VIII launched - first INTELSAT satellite built to a contractor's design ◦ Hughes describe SPACEWAY design ◦ DirecTV begins Direct Broadcast to Home
1995◦ Panamsat - First private company to provide global satellite services.
6
Satellite History CalendarSatellite History Calendar 1996
◦ INMARSAT III launched - first of the multi-beam mobile satellites (built by GE/Marconi) ◦ Echostar begins Direct Broadcast Service
1997 ◦ IRIDIUM launches first test satellites ◦ ITU-WRC'97
1999 ◦ AceS launch first of the L-band MSS Super-GSOs - built by Lockheed Martin ◦ Iridium Bankruptcy - the first major failure?
2000 ◦ Globalstar begins service ◦ Thuraya launch L-band MSS Super-GSO
2001◦ XM Satellite Radio begins service◦ Pakistan’s 2nd Satellite, BADR-B was launched on 10 Dec 2001 at 9:15a from Baikonour Cosmodrome,
Kazakistan 2002
◦ Sirius Satellite Radio begins service◦ Paksat-1, was deployed at 38 degrees E orbital slot in December 2002, Paksat-1, was deployed at 38
degrees E orbital slot in December 2002 2004
◦ Teledesic network planned to start operation 2005
◦ Intelsat and Panamsat Merge ◦ VUSat OSCAR-52 (HAMSAT) Launched
2006◦ CubeSat-OSCAR 56 (Cute-1.7) Launched◦ K7RR-Sat launched by California Polytechnic University
2007◦ Prism was launched by University of Tokyo
2008◦ COMPASS-1; a project of Aachen University was launched from Satish Dawan Space Center, India. It
failed to achieve orbit.
7
Satellite-Related TermsSatellite-Related TermsEarth Stations : antenna systems on or
near earth.Uplink : transmission from an earth station
to a satellite.Downlink : transmission from a satellite to
an earth station.Transponder : electronics in the satellite
that convert uplink signals to downlink signals.
8
Geometry TermsGeometry TermsElevation angle : the angle from the
horizontal to the point on the center of the main beam of the antenna when the antenna is pointed directly at the satellite
Minimum elevation angle
Coverage angle : the measure of the portion of the earth's surface visible to the satellite
9
10
Minimum Elevation AngleMinimum Elevation AngleReasons affecting minimum
elevation angle of earth station’s antenna (>0o)◦ Buildings, trees, and other terrestrial
objects block the line of sight◦ Atmospheric attenuation is greater at low
elevation angles◦ Electrical noise generated by the earth's
heat near its surface adversely affects reception
11
Satellite Link Performance FactorsSatellite Link Performance Factors
Distance between earth station antenna and satellite antenna
For downlink, terrestrial distance between earth station antenna and “aim point” of satellite◦ Displayed as a satellite footprint (Next
Figure) Atmospheric attenuation
◦ Affected by oxygen, water, angle of elevation, and higher frequencies
12
Satellite FootprintSatellite Footprint
13
Atmospheric LossesAtmospheric Losses
Different types of atmospheric losses can disturb radio wave transmission in satellite systems:◦ Atmospheric absorption◦ Atmospheric attenuation◦ Traveling ionospheric disturbances
14
15
Atmospheric AbsorptionAtmospheric Absorption Energy absorption by atmospheric
gases, which varies with the frequency of the radio waves.
Two absorption peaks are observed (for 90º elevation angle):◦ 22.3 GHz from resonance absorption in
water vapor (H2O)◦ 60 GHz from resonance absorption in
oxygen (O2)
16
Atmospheric AttenuationAtmospheric Attenuation Rain is the main cause of atmospheric attenuation
(hail, ice and snow have little effect on attenuation because of their low water content).
Total attenuation from rain can be determined by:◦ A = L [dB]◦ where [dB/km] is called the specific attenuation, and can
be calculated from specific attenuation coefficients in tabular form that can be found in a number of publications
◦ where L [km] is the effective path length of the signal through the rain; note that this differs from the geometric path length due to fluctuations in the rain density.
17
Traveling Ionospheric DisturbancesTraveling Ionospheric Disturbances
Traveling ionospheric disturbances are clouds of electrons in the ionosphere that provoke radio signal fluctuations which can only be determined on a statistical basis.
Scintillation◦ variations in the amplitude, phase, polarization, or
angle of arrival of radio waves, caused by irregularities in the ionosphere which change over time.( time-varying model)
◦ The main effect of scintillations is fading of the signal.
18
What is PolarizationWhat is Polarization??Polarization is the property of electromagnetic
waves that describes the direction of the transverse electric field.
Since electromagnetic waves consist of an electric and a magnetic field vibrating at right angles to each other.
it is necessary to adopt a convention to determine the polarization of the signal.
Conventionally, the magnetic field is ignored and the plane of the electric field is used.
19
Types of PolarizationTypes of Polarization Linear Polarization
(horizontal or vertical):◦ the two orthogonal
components of the electric field are in phase;
◦ The direction of the line in the plane depends on the relative amplitudes of the two components.
Circular Polarization:◦ The two components are
exactly 90º out of phase and have exactly the same amplitude.
Elliptical Polarization:◦ All other cases.
Linear Polarisation Circular Polarisation Elliptical Polarisation
20
Satellite CommunicationsSatellite Communications Alternating vertical and
horizontal polarization is widely used on satellite communications
This reduces interference between programs on the same frequency band transmitted from adjacent satellites (One uses vertical, the next horizontal, and so on)
Allows for reduced angular separation between the satellites.
21
Classification of Satellite Classification of Satellite OrbitsOrbits
Circular or elliptical orbit Circular with center at earth’s center Elliptical with one foci at earth’s center
Orbit around earth in different planes Equatorial orbit above earth’s equator Polar orbit passes over both poles Other orbits referred to as inclined orbits
Altitude of satellites Geostationary orbit (GEO) Medium earth orbit (MEO) Low earth orbit (LEO)
22
OrbitsOrbits LEO: Low Earth Orbit. Low power, Low latency, More Satellites, Small
Footprint MEO: Medium Earth Orbit High bandwidth, High power, High latency GEO: Geostationary Earth Orbit 36000 Km = 22300 Miles, equatorial, High latency
23
LEO Satellite CharacteristicsLEO Satellite Characteristics
Circular/slightly elliptical orbit under 2000 km
Orbit period ranges from 1.5 to 2 hoursDiameter of coverage is about 8000 kmRound-trip signal propagation delay less than
20 msMaximum satellite visible time up to 20 minSystem must cope with large Doppler shifts
24
LEO CategoriesLEO CategoriesLittle LEOs
◦ Frequencies below 1 GHz ◦ 5MHz of bandwidth ◦ Data rates up to 10 kbps◦ Aimed at paging, tracking, and low-rate
messagingBig LEOs
◦ Frequencies above 1 GHz ◦ Support data rates up to a few megabits
per sec◦ Offer same services as little LEOs in
addition to voice and positioning services
25
MEO Satellite CharacteristicsMEO Satellite Characteristics
Circular orbit at an altitude in the range of 5000 to 12,000 km
Orbit period of 6 hoursDiameter of coverage is 10,000 to
15,000 kmRound trip signal propagation delay
less than 50 msMaximum satellite visible time is a few
hours
26
GEO OrbitGEO OrbitAdvantages of the GEO orbit
◦No problem with frequency changes◦Tracking of the satellite is simplified◦High coverage area
Disadvantages of the GEO orbit◦Weak signal after traveling over
35,000 km◦Polar regions are poorly served◦Signal sending delay is substantial
27
At the Geostationary orbit the satellite covers 42.2% of the earth’s surface.
Theoretically 3 geostationary satellites provides 100% earth coverage
28
29
Satellite OrbitsSatellite Orbits
30
Ways to CategorizeWays to CategorizeCommunications SatellitesCommunications Satellites
Coverage area◦Global, regional, national
Service type◦Fixed service satellite (FSS)◦Broadcast service satellite (BSS)◦Mobile service satellite (MSS)
General usage◦Commercial, military, amateur,
experimental
31
Frequency Bands Available for Frequency Bands Available for Satellite CommunicationsSatellite Communications
32
NetworkingNetworking
33
What is the problemWhat is the problem??
HOW can we divide a common source between some users?◦ TDMA / FDMA
wasting channel resource large delay at low loads
◦ Statistical Multiplexing Low delay at low load wasting channel resource at collisions.
34
What is the best choice for satelliteWhat is the best choice for satellite
Large BDP (bandwidth delay product).◦ there will be much resource waste when
collision resolution.◦ TDM or SM◦ A reservation system!
a combined version of TDM and statistical Multiplexing.
35
RESERVATION SYSTEMSRESERVATION SYSTEMSThe most widely used method for satellite communication
36
Reservation systemReservation system
A reservation system with 4 users
37
Reservation systemReservation system Throughput is
1. Reservation contain no data:
2. Reservation carry some portion of data:
38
1 2 3 1 2 3 1
Transmission interval for user 1
Arrival interval for user 1 in an exhaustive system
Arrival interval for user 1 in a partially gated system
Arrival interval for user 1 in a gated system
Packets arriving in the arrival interval shown are transmitted in the transmission interval shown
Reservation systemReservation system
39
}{}{}{}{ )(iliiii VENEREWE
Single user reservation systemSingle user reservation system
40
Multiuser reservation systemMultiuser reservation system
}{}{}{}{ iiiii YENEREWE
41
Delay formulas for reservation Delay formulas for reservation systemsystem
A multiuser reservation system
•A single user reservation system
42
How to use reservation system in How to use reservation system in satellite networkssatellite networks??
43
Is the above relation true?
NO
44
Disadvantages of the proposed Disadvantages of the proposed algorithmalgorithm
If any error happen in feedback signal received from channel by user synchronization will lost.
Violating of fairness.
What to do now??
• Fix the frame time slot to a specified value larger than channel propagation delay.
• Using a separate frequency channel for sending reservation.(to obtain a closed form expression for delay)
45
Analyzing Delay formulaAnalyzing Delay formula
46
Additional pointsAdditional pointsWe can not increase number of usersIncreasing users mean wasting
bandwidth!(γ=mν/2β)
What is the solution?
Use the below system!
47
IINTERLEAVED NTERLEAVED FFRAME RAME FFLUSH LUSH OOUTUT
Is suitable and can be general for satellite use
48
IFFO-System considerationIFFO-System considerationGEO satelliteTime is normalized to 22.5 millisecond
(one slot duration)M users with infinite buffer capacityArrival process is Bernoulli with
parameter λEach frame duration is at least 12 slot
49
Interleaved Frame Flush OutInterleaved Frame Flush Out
50
How this protocol workHow this protocol work??
51
Different kinds of IFFODifferent kinds of IFFO!!PR-IFFO: Pure Reservation IFFOF-IFFO: Fixed Contention IFFOC-IFFO: Controlled Contention IFFO
52
F-IFFOF-IFFO
53
C-IFFOC-IFFO
54
Performance evaluationPerformance evaluationPR-IFFO
• Infinite Markov chain
55
• F-IFFO
PDF of not transmitted packets
Performance evaluationPerformance evaluation
56
Performance evaluation
• F-IFFO
57
Performance evaluation• F-IFFO
58
Performance evaluation
• C-IFFO
The main issue in C-IFFO is obtaining the optimum set for sending probabilities
59
SOME NEWER SOME NEWER PROTOCOLSPROTOCOLS
They all have the same basics for transmitting data
60
What is the problemWhat is the problem??the kind of traffic that we should pass
through satellite is bur sty.◦Web based traffic.◦Position reporting or other signaling
information in mobile networks.DAMA (demand assignment multiple
access protocols) is not a suitable choice for this kind of traffic.
61
What is the problemWhat is the problem??
RA are robust to this kind of traffic.RA is not suitable for satellite links.RA use in initial network logging and the
transmission of capacity requests in contention mini slot.
Solution is the combination of RA and DAMA.
62
SOME NEW PROTOCOLSSOME NEW PROTOCOLSthese protocols will work well
under bursty traffic generated by large population of users
CRDSACRDSA++E-SSA
63
CRDSACRDSADiversity Slotted ALOHA has used
in TDMA systems with low efficiency and reliability typically for logging into the network.◦It has very low throughput.
Contention Resolution DSA.◦Diversity such as DSA but with
additional signaling to indicate the twin packet location.
64
CRDSACRDSAContention Resolution DSA.
◦ In successful packet reception allows to locate the twin packet within the frame and to accurately cancel it in addition to the one successfully decoded.
◦ By iterating the process a number of times some of the initially lost packets can be recovered and the DSA performance enhanced.
65
Enhancement of DSA with additional signaling information indicating the location of twin packet in CRDSA
Throughput versus load
66
Throughput is not so highThroughput is not so high!!CRDSA++
◦Increased number of packet repetitions(3-5)
◦exploitation of the received packets power unbalance to further boost the RA performance.
67
The increased diversity allow to better clean
up the collisions through iterative
processingThroughput versus load
68
CRDSACRDSACRDSA++ performance are
further enhanced by power unbalance.◦Successive interference cancellation
is inherently enhanced by the received packet power unbalance allowing to resolve collisions that were destructive otherwise.
69
Questions without Questions without answersanswers!!
How to combine CRDSA with DAMA?
Adjusting the coding rate and transmit energy in a fading environment for CRDSA.
Power control issues for SSA protocols
Interference cancelation for E-SSA
70
LEO PROTOCOLSLEO PROTOCOLSSome simple sample protocols
71
LEO ProtocolsLEO Protocols◦ SALOHA
Is relatively simple to realize. It can not adapt well to dynamic traffic pattern.
◦ VCR-SALOHA(varying call rate SALOHA) Can adapt to load changes. Its maximum efficiency is 38%. Its reservation period length is fixed.
◦ AP-SALOHA(adaptive polling and SALOHA)(is for terrestrial stations). Variation of reservation interval adaptively with
respect to load. 19% improvement over VCR-SALOHA.
72
SALOHASALOHA1993 in PACSAT time = channel reservation period(SALOHA) +message
delivery period.An invitation frame is broadcast by the satellite to start a
reservation period of N request slot longA station waits a random number (between 0 and N -1) of time
slots before it sends its request.Main problem is: N is constant but M (the number of users)
and traffic are time varying
73
Success probability is heavily dependent on M and N
Success probability versus M the number of users
74
Reservation period
Gnd1-TX
Gnd1-RX
Sat-TX
Sat-RX
Gnd2-TX
Gnd2-RX
invitation
invitation
invitation
(1)U/D Req
(1)U/D Req
Request slot-1 Request slot-N
(2)U/D Req
Back off N-1 slot(2)U/D Req
75
VCR-SALOHAVCR-SALOHAImprovement with respect to SALOHA:
◦ Sending invitation packet is adjusted by change of station request traffic.
◦ Adjust the calling rate to maintain the maximum 38% throughput.
Disadvantages:◦ Additional control packet to adjust success
probability.◦ N is fixed. More overhead in bandwidth.◦ Maximum throughput is 38%
76
Question: Why we should change N Question: Why we should change N adaptively with respect to Madaptively with respect to M??
with decreasing N we can use channel in favor of sending more data than reservation packets but success probability will decrease and vice versa.
for every fix M there is an optimum value for N in which success probability is maximized.
77
AP-SALOHAAP-SALOHAWhen satellite is invisible there will be more packet
arrival in terminal. We will use this property in AP-SALOHA
Visible station are divided to ◦ High probability set.◦ Low probability set.
◦Station after viewing the satellite is in high probability set and after serving all waiting packets it go to low probability set.
◦If its probability of having data packets is higher than a threshold it goes to high probability set.
78
AP-SALOHAReservation interval is divided into polling
part and SALOHA part.
◦ Polling part is for stations in high probability set.◦ S-ALOHA part is for stations in low probability set
79
Advantages of Satellite Advantages of Satellite CommunicationCommunication
Can reach over large geographical areaFlexible (if transparent transponders) Easy to install new circuits Circuit costs independent of distance Broadcast possibilities Temporary applications (restoration) Niche applications Mobile applications (especially "fill-in") Terrestrial network "by-pass" Provision of service to remote or
underdeveloped areas
80
Disadvantages of Satellite Disadvantages of Satellite CommunicationCommunication
Large up front capital costs (space segment and launch)
Terrestrial break even distance expanding (now approx. size of Europe)
Interference and propagation delay Congestion of frequencies and orbits
81
When to use SatellitesWhen to use Satellites When the unique features of satellite
communications make it attractive When the costs are lower than terrestrial routing When it is the only solution Examples:
◦ Communications to ships and aircraft (especially safety communications)
◦ TV services - contribution links, direct to cable head, direct to home
◦ Data services - private networks ◦ Overload traffic ◦ 1 for N diversity
82
When to use TerrestrialWhen to use Terrestrial PSTN - satellite is becoming increasingly
uneconomic for most trunk telephony routes
but, there are still good reasons to use satellites for telephony such as: thin routes, diversity, very long distance traffic and remote locations.
Land mobile/personal communications - in urban areas of developed countries new terrestrial infrastructure is likely to dominate (e.g. GSM, etc.)
but, satellite can provide fill-in as terrestrial networks are implemented, also provide similar services in rural areas and underdeveloped countries
83
ReferencesReferences1. Satellite communications systems engineering, by Louis J.
Ippolito, 2008 JohnWiley & Sons Ltd.2. The Satellite Communication Applications Handbook, by Bruce
R. Elbert.3. Satellite Communications, by Dennis Roddy.4. Satellite Communications Tutorial, by John P. Silver,” RF,RFIC
and microwave theory, Design.5. Modeling the Effects of Ionospheric Scintillations on LEO
Satellite Communications, by Sheng-Yi Li and C. H. Liu, Fellow, IEEE, IEEE COMMUNICATIONS LETTERS, VOL. 8, NO. 3, MARCH 2004.
6. R. Gallager “Data network” Prentice Hall 1987.7. Simon Lam ,“Satellite Packet Communication-Multiple Access Protocols and
Performance” IEEE Trans On communication Oct 1979. 8. Baozhong Cheng Jeff Ward, Marting Sweeting“An Optimized Multiple Access Control
Protocol for a ‘little LEO’Satellite Store-and-Forward Global Data Network” IEEE 2003.9. Riccardo De Gaudenzi and Oscar del Rio Herrero, “Advances in Random Access Protocols
for Satellite Networks” IEEE 2009. 10. J. E. Wieselthier, A. Ephremides, “A New Class of Protocols for Multiple Access in
Satellite Networks” TRANSACTIONS ON Automatic control, VOL. AC-25, NO. 5, October 1980.
11. A. F. Canhoto, A. Anzaloni“Performance Evaluation of SSTP- a Transport Protocol for Satellite Channels” 2009 International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops.
12. Http://en.wikipedia.org
84