sap upgrade questionnaire

TCS Questionnaires

SAP GRC Access Control1 10

Can you provide GRC Landscape?

2 10

3 10

4 10

5 10

6 10

Ques. No

Page No

RFP Section

Statement of Work

Statement of Work

Which GRC Access Control modules are to be implemented

Statement of Work

How many number of Back end system to be connected to GRC AC

Statement of Work

How many number of instance per system to be brought under the preview of GRC AC

Statement of Work

How many number of clients per system to be brought under the preview of GRC AC

Statement of Work

How many Users and what are roles per system

DWA Response

Yes, we can provide it to the successful bidder

All

SAP only for now

3

3 (what is the difference between question 4 and 5)

5000 users, I need clarity for the second part of the question

RFP Section TCS Questionnaires

SAP Technical Upgrade1 6

Technical Upgrade

2 6

Technical Upgrade

3 6

Technical Upgrade

4 6Technical Upgrade

5 6

Technical Upgrade




9 6

Technical Upgrade

10 6

Technical Upgrade

11 6

Technical Upgrade

12 6Technical Upgrade Are you using customized role or SAP std?

Ques. No

Page No

One TCS Tool(Used over many client locations) ACE+ can be utilized to better estimate the efforts needed for Upgrade. This tool will extract us the details of Z Programs, Objects , Utilization of System patches and other details. This will reduce manual efforts . This tool can be run in production replication environment(Staging or Quality) . Will WTA be open for this exercise ? If not, TCS will go ahead and put assumption based response from below answers provided by WTA.Estimation of Remidiation, Design Phases need a thorough understanding of level of customization , this helps in estimations as well as risk managemnet and downtime.It's very critical to know below information for response.Can you please provide the details Total number of Custom repository ( Z,Y Programs ) - Total Number of BDCs - Total Number of Clone Program

Are you using customer name space or additional (partner, 3rd party ) name space?

Please provide inputs on SAP system Landscape? - Number of Systems involved in the landscape - Development, Test, Training, Quality, Production, etc. for all SAP Systems. - Current OS / DB with its Version.

Did WTA already installed additional Code Pages to have additional language supportPl provide DB Size and hardware details for following systems - Dev, QA, PRD

What is current system status ? Is it Unicode or Non-Unicode ? If Non-Unicode , WTA open for Unicode conversion ?

Unicode conversion , Upgrade to Higher version might need a change in the current Server Size, DB sizes and might need more Application Servers . Is this been considered during your primary assessment ?

Does WTA have test scripts available for all the business processes implemented? What percentage of business processes are covered by these scripts? Please provide total number of Test scripts.

How is WTA's readiness on testing requirements during upgrade and Rollout ? - Availability of test script - Testing strategy

13 6 Technical Upgrade Does WTA has Role based Authorizations?14 6

Technical Upgrade

15 6

Technical Upgrade

16 6 Technical Upgrade What is the IT team composition at DWA?

SAP ERP Implementation1 10

Statement of Work

2General

3

General

4

General

5

General

6General

7General

8General

9General

10 83.2.2 Eloborate fleet management requirements

11 114.1 Eloborate EC&O requirements

12 114.1

13 114.1 Eloborate MII requirements

14 83.3.2

15 93.4.2

Please provide interface architecture detailing which legacy systems communicates with R/3 system?How many interfaces are build (inbound plus out bound) around SAP?

Are documents like Blueprint, Configuration, Functional Specifications, Technical Specifications, Training Material, etc available and can be provided at later point?On scale of 1-10, what is the quality of this documentation in terms of coverage of implemented business processes. 10 being "everything is well covered"?

Enterprise Master Data Management, is WTA looking for SAP MDM implementation?Request to provide SAP license Bill of Material for new modules in scope of this RFPTCS Assumes that WTA would perform SAP server sizing and provide required infrastructure for performing system upgrade. Pl. confirm our understanding

Can we have exact scope / detailed business requirement of implementation for new modules/SAP Components for the list mentioned in RFP?

Is the re-implementation option is explored instead of technical/functional approach. Pros/Cons of both the approachs need to be doneNumber of total SAP users. If possible, please also share module / function wise SAP usersNumber of locations (with names) where SAP is being usedPost Go-live SAP Support required from central location, or locally at the major locationsTraining Scope - is it for the key users (train the trainer) or also required for the end users

Eloborate Portfolio and Project Mgmt (PPM) requirements

Eloborate Sap Auto ID Enterprise requirementsEloborate SRM requirements, what subcomponents of SRM are required

16 10

3.6.2

17 103.7.2

18 103.7.2

19 104.1

Eloborate treasury operations of WTE,

204.1

21 114.1

22 11

4.1

23 114.1

24 114.1

25General

26General

27

General

What sub component of CO (mgmt Acconting) is required - Internal order a/c, Activity based costing, profitability analysis, profit center accounting, etc

Eloborate Hire to retire requirements - what sub modules are required like PA, OM, Time Mgmt etcData migration from Persal to SAP - only balances to be migrated to SAP, or historical data is also required, if yes please eloborate

Business Objects - Number of dashboards / KPIs to be developedEloborate SAP BPC requirements, how many companies are involved WTE/WTA, and the structureEloborate Enterprise MDM requirements - is it gioing to be a central MDM server linking ERP, CRM, SRM and any other system for Master Data. How many Masters are required to be managed using MDM

Please provide the list of Interfaces currently in places. Please also provide functionalaties implemented within each systemEloborate ARCGIS interfacing requirements, If integration engine available with WTAIs DWA is in favor of using train the trainer concept for end user training?TCS recommends onsite - offshore models for implementation and post live support. Does DWA is in favor of this models?

How is the current enviroment maintained today (Maintain here includes same scope as defined for application maintenance and operational support - service desk, support, medium+minor development,monitoring, incident mgmt etc.).In the RFP only 3 months support is mentioned.Does DWA has any plan of long term maintenance support after the system is stable.

DWA Response

This project includes reimplementation of old modules therefore there is no need to concentrate on old mudules and the functionality included in them.



This project includes reimplementation of old modules therefore there is no need to obtain old documents.

The department does not have a testing for the upgrade and test scripts will be developed in line with ASAP metholodology

We are planning to have minimal customisation where necessary and SAP standard functionality

Yes

Yes

As per TOR

Bidders are required to develop strategy as per TOR

This project includes reimplementation of old modules therefore there is no need to obtain old documents. Refer to the TOR for systems that can interface with SAP.

This project includes reimplementation of old modules therefore there is no need to obtain old documents.

No, the implementor will have to perform server sizing and the WTE willl provide the infrastructure

±5000 users

In all the 9 provinces including 4 clusters and 4 construction sites

Centrally with first line of support (internal) at major locations

The module should support WTE business as presented in the briefing session





All sub modules


The training strategy should be documented by the successful bidder

sap upgrade questionnaire

Documents