russian roulette—the swine flue vaccinations - hubert_luns

8/3/2019 Russian RouletteThe Swine Flue Vaccinations - Hubert_Luns

1/13

- 1 -

- Russian Roulette -(Autopsy report on the Swine Flue Vaccinations)

1 A series of abuses

With a great deal of panicky information, a worldwide vaccination campaign against theMexican or swine flu virus was started up in 2009 with a vaccine (Pandremix) against theH1N1 virus. Some countries like Belgium refused to be panicked wheres the pande-mic? but the Netherlands opted for a double dose (1) costing an extra-budgetary 700million. (2) This came in the wake of the largely ineffective and sometimes seriouslydangerous vaccine against cervical cancer, designed for the sexually active and promis-cuous woman and therefore (!) all 12-year-olds were vaccinated. (3)

Because the thalidomide scandal is once more the object of public interest, at the end of this article I present a case history of the government activities, the activities of an arro-gant and conscience-less government, which does not exist for us but for itself. Thescandal dates from the 1960s. Deformed children were born after their mothers had takenthe thalidomide pill. Many of these mothers most of whom are no longer alive suf-fered a severe guilt complex because they thoughtlessly swallowed an easily obtainable

pill, blaming themselves that they had not been extra cautious and had failed to followtheir instincts according to thalidomide child Martine Olivier, whose mother took only asingle pill during her pregnancy! (4) Accepting responsibility, thats what its all about. Agovernment that allows the most innocent and most helpless beings to be torn from thewomb, as if it were the most normal thing in the world, cannot and may not be trusted. Itis our duty to be critical.

In France in the 1980 s there was the drama in which transfusion blood contaminated with

the AIDS virus was administered to patients because it was thought to be a pity to throwaway the old untreated stocks to the value of 34 million francs (about 10 million euros).The French state had to pay damages of a half million to two million francs per case


2/13

- 2 -

(1991 legislation). No problem. The cash was raised by in-creasing the tax on petrol. In 1994 the four people respon-sible for the scandal at the national transfusion centre, theCNTS, were handed down jail sentences varying from oneto four years. Director Michael Garretta was accused of fraud. The judge accepted the entire accusation levelled atEdmond Herv, the minister responsible (Secretary of State for Health), which amounted to severe negligence. This was in 1999. The judgereckoned that he did not have to be punished because well, you know it had allhappened so long ago. Herv spoke the immortal words: Responsible, yes. Guilty, no. The thalidomide mothers felt the opposite: responsible, no; guilty, yes.

2 A gross scandal

Because of the lack of information regarding the Mexican flu vaccine, the Stralingsarm Nederland foundation (SAN) submitted a request under the WOB legislation (WetOpenbaarheid van Bestuur legislation on government transparency) in order to

examine all the documentation on the acquisition of the H 1 N1 vaccines by the Ministry of Health (VWS) and the CBG (College ter Beoordeling van Geneesmiddelen Medi-cines Evaluation Board). Only after the request was refused did SAN take out an injunc-tion against VWS and CBG on 22 nd October (the vaccination campaign was to start on22 nd November). The trial brief showed that both these bodies are completely oversha-dowed by the European Commission and the EMEA (European Medicines Agency),which gets two-thirds of its financing from the pharmaceutical industry and is thus far from being objective. The vaccines were approved by the EMEA via a central proce-dure and thus obtained a European trading licence.

The injunction showed that the role and authority of the Dutch government was lackingeven though the government pretended otherwise. It carried out no separate testing. Mi-nister Ab Klink, a sociologist and not a doctor, merely purchased the vaccine and had itinjected. Our rulers turned out to be mere serving hatches for what had been decided atEuropean level. Belgium withdrew. Poland, EU member since 2004, even forbade thePadremix vaccine. The Polish Minister of Health, Eva Kopacz, herself a GP, addressedthe parliament on 5 th November: The governments of Western Europe have entered into

secret agreements with the pharmaceutical industry. () There is a great deal of secrecy surrounding the components in the vaccines. In France only 8.5 % of the populationagreed to be vaccinated in spite of a massive government campaign, according to the

parliamentary report released on 17 July 2010 that talks of a formidable crisis of trust of the French people who do not believe any more in the precautionary messages of thehealth authority. It follows from this that there was no compulsion. Minister Ab Klink istherefore completely responsible for & guilty of any adverse effects that might haveoccurred! According to the Dutch professional journal Nursin g half of the nurses haverefused to be vaccinated. Bravo!

What now follows is largely based on the report published by a Benedictine nun, Teresa Forcades iVila, of the Sant Benet monastery in Montserrat. Shehas a doctorate in public health from the Universityof Barcelona and is specialised in Internal Medicineat the State University of New York. Her story has

been on YouTube since September 2009. Her spea-king voice is distant and businesslike, but this makes

her even more convincing. She measures out in de-tail the problem with the current vaccines. The core


3/13

- 3 -

of her report is that the usual clinical tests were not carried out, tests that would otherwisehave been applied to judge the effectiveness and the side effects of the new additions tothe vaccines, the so-called adjuvants, that serve to help realise more vaccines with lessviral material. According to the pharmaceutical industry that results in a less natural sti-mulus to the immune system, whereby the shortage of antibodies in the production of thevaccines is compensated.

French nurses have declared that the adjuvants in the H1N1 vaccine stimulate the immunesystem to produce ten times more antibodies than normal. Thanks to the over-dosing,nobody knows to what degree this artificial stimulation leads to immune diseases, inclu-ding auto-immune illnesses and allergies.

Totally unacceptable tests, carried out by the manufacturers themselves to check theworking of the vaccine, were based on observations after 21 and 45 days. Tests still to becarried out had been programmed (5) and it was admitted that there were practically noscientific data on possible effects on pregnant women. Vaccine manufacturer Novartissummarises in its American patient information folder as follows: It is not known if the

vaccine can damage the foetus in pregnant women. Safety and effectiveness in childrenbelow the age of four years are uncertain. For this reason in France, Spain and Luxem- bourg an adjuvant-free vaccine was made available for pregnant women.

Dutch policy is completely at odds with the precautionary principle. It is staggering thatthe government should have advised that pregnant women and children from the age of six months should have themselves injected with this vaccine that contained large quan-tities of the adjuvant known as squalene, in emulsion form, together with the effect-rai-sing glycoprotein 120, an HIV-1 protein fragment that prefers to take up abode in the

brain (HIV is the cause of the AIDS auto-immune disease). Squalene oil is a substancefound naturally in the body, but in emulsive form it can cause immune diseases (moreabout this later). (6) This government recommendation therefore is an attack on the foetus

and the infant, whose immune system is still developing and is therefore extremelyvulnerable. Thiomersal, which contains mercury, is also added to the vaccine. From 2004thiomersal has been banned from use in vaccines in the Netherlands, (7) , the reason beingthat the body should not be challenged with poisonous mercury. Despite this, the vaccinewas accepted for the Netherlands without this being the subject of discussion.

Forcades starts her story by explaining that swine flu is not a new type of virus, althoughit is related to the Spanish flu (1918-1919), that is estimated to have cost 20 million lives,

but against which human beings have now built up sufficient resistance. The new thingabout the swine flu is the appearance of a viral chain (S-OIV), unknown until April 2009,that subsequently went round the countries of the southern hemi-sphere in what is usually known as the Austrian Winter. This had amuch lower death rate than normal flu fewer than 3,600 dead.For this Forcades quotes a member of the French Health Counciland refers to the President of the umbrella Spanish MedicalAssociation to underline that the new virus is much milder thannormal flu and seasonal viruses. The ECDC (European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control) states that in the years of amoderate flu epidemic in Europe approximately 40,000 people die, often people alreadysick or elderly people, of consequences directly linked to flu. In the years that flu took onmore severe forms the number of deaths has been estimated at 220,000 such as in 1957(Asian flu) and in 1968 (Hong Kong flu). How then can it be that in the Press andcirculars it is stated that we have a pandemic on our hands? This has to do with the defini-tion maintained by the World Health Organisation since 2009, according to which thenumber of deaths by infection is not important. A pandemic is now described as a simul-taneous outbreak in different countries due to an infection focus with new characteristics.

H1N1 virus


4/13

- 4 -

Normal flu with one new facet is therefore a pandemic. In such a case, proclaiming thenext to highest alarm phase is absurd.

3 Not the first time

The current vaccination campaign has a previous history, explains Forcades. In 1976 inthe United States 46 million people were vaccinated with the untested X53A vaccine because of the fear that a flu epidemic would break out, caused by the same H1N1 virusas now, but the epidemic never happened. In August 2009 the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) carried a report on the history of flu viruses. The article confirms thatthe H1N1 virus, descended from the Spanish flu, appeared again in 1977 after having

been constructed in a laboratory. The fact that such a thing can escape from a laboratorycannot be a coincidence, in view of the security protocols in force.

It has to be admitted: virus leakages happen, as in 1978 during the Plum Island Lab in-cident in New York State. This centre studied biological warfare and had as one of itsfounders Erich Traub, a Nazi expert in the field of biological warfare. In 1978 some kind

of leak occurred in the next terrain. Later in 1991 a bio-meltdown occurred when hurri-cane Bob raced by. Enormous numbers of bacteria and viruses escaped that day. (8) Butthat sort of accident always comes unexpectedly!

How was it possible in 1976 to forecast a new outbreak of Spanish flu (H1N1), known popularly as swine flu? According to the NEJM this flu was around for the last time in1976! It appears, according to Forcades, that the first sample of the original Spanish fluvirus was obtained after an Eskimo woman, who had died of Spanish flu in 1918, had

been exhumed. A documentary on the subject was transmitted on many television chan-nels. Her body had been conserved in the permafrost ground, which made it possible totake tissue samples together with the elements necessary to produce the virus syntheti-cally. Thus from 1977 the H1N1 flu virus was again part of the seasonal mix of mild viru-ses.


5/13

- 5 -

In 1976 it was barely possible to estimate that the world population would still have suffi-cient resistance. It is not too difficult to make a relationship between the pandemic alarmof 1976 and the reappearance on the scene of the H1N1-alias-Spanish-flu virus. Indeed, inhis television speech in which he announced the pandemic, President Ford referred to theagreement with the Spanish flu. (9)

Ten weeks after the start, the American vaccina-tion programme was stopped because 25 peoplehad died as a result and more than 500 were suf-fering from serious symptoms of paralysis, typi-fied as the Guillain-Barr syndrome. The num-

bers rose to approximately 300 dead and 3,000with paralysis. You could call it Russian rou-lette There are now lawsuits being pursuedagainst the American government with claimstotalling 3.5 billion dollars.

Finally there is the Gulf War syndrome caused by the anthrax vaccine that the Americanmilitary fighting in the Gulf War were given in 1990-1991. It is certain that this vaccinecontained squalene, possibly in higher doses such as in Pandremix, although the FederalDrug Administration denied vigorously that the anthrax vaccine contained squalene (10) :

Squalene has been used extensively as an adjuvant in animal models to induceauto-immune diseases. Recent research into Gulf War Syndrome () showed that95% of overtly ill troops who were deployed, and 100% of those who wereimmunized but not deployed, had antibodies to squalene. Antibodies to squalenewere not detectable in the general public, or in Gulf War Veterans who were not ill.Two control subjects who volunteered to participate in a vaccine trial at the UnitedStates National Institutes of Health developed a multisystem disorder similar to thatof Gulf War Syndrome. The trial involved the use of a squalene-containing adjuvant. (Thesis by Arlette Mercae, University of Tasmania 2003, pp. 83-84: FromImmunology to Social Policy: excerpt / book )

The anthrax vaccinations caused adverse effects in the form of serious paralytic symp-toms and arthritis, as also fibromyalgia and lymphadenopathy which by no means ex-hausts the list of illnesses contracted. (11) Because of the drop-like solution of squalene(emulsion) no equal distribution in the blood occurs after injection. The molecules, as itwere, stick together and act like swarms of bees in attacking mode, against which the bo-dy produces antibodies through which the bodys own squalene is adversely affected,with all the deleterious consequences of such. An excellently documented book that pro-vides insight into how it came about that squalene was adopted as an adjuvant and why it

is so dangerous is Vaccine-A The Covert Government Experiment that's killing our soldiers and why GIs are only the first victims by Gary Matsumoto (2004, BasicBooks). At the end of the book are extensive references regarding the scientific researchinto squalene (see Squalene References ). I would now like to quote from pp. 156-57:

Although, under normal circumstances, the body will not react to its ownmolecules a phenomenon that immunologists called tolerance tolerance can be

broken. This is the essence of auto-immunity. Antibodies against self, or auto-antibodies, are associated with debilitating and sometimes fatal auto-immunediseases.

When Pam Asa first suggested that Gulf War Syndrome might be due to anti-squalene antibodies, many scientists balked. They said it couldnt happen: the

immune system could not form antibodies to a lipid or fat like squalene becausethese molecules were too small. On the face of it, this was foolish because, for


6/13

- 6 -

decades, anti-phospholipid antibodies had been a key test for lupus. The scientistswho didnt know this were probably going by something presumed to be truedecades ago that only relatively large molecules like proteins could induce the

production of an antibody.There is at least one other reason why many smart, impressively credentialed

scientists presumed that the immune system would not produce antibodies tosqualene. For the better part of the 20 th century, scientists have believed thatadjuvants stimulate a non-specific immune response. In other words, theysupposedly activated a robust immune response to everything but themselves.Scientists conceived this idea before they knew where antibodies came from or howthey worked (in detail), and then clung to that idea as scientific gospel. () Asmolecules go, squalene was relatively light; it was small and it was an adjuvant -qualities that theoretically added up to no immune response or a non-specificresponse. But if the human immune system made antibodies specific to squalene [asit does] if squalene activated the immune systems whole cellular repertoire thenit would be undeniably dangerous [and cause HAD or Human Adjuvant Disease].

4 The government is looking for willing sheep

The above indicates that this was all according to a plan. A plan that, even if orchestratedwith bad intentions, does not mean that all the players were informed. A major factor ismoney billions! But there is more at stake: the ghosts of the 1920s and 1930s are reap-

pearing. It would be too much to go further into this aspect and that is not needed inorder to demonstrate the criminal nature of the vaccination circus.

It recalls the obligatory fluoridation of drinking water as medication against toothdecay. On 22 nd June 1973, this was forbidden by the Dutch Supreme Court. It turned outthat the figures used in a comparative study of the towns of Tiel and Culemborg demon-strating the benefits of fluoridation had been falsified or, in the words of Dr. Jansma,were dubious and almost amateuristic . (12) Just to clarify: fluoride-rich regions havecertain clear illnesses; fluoride-poor regions not; there are certainly fluoride sicknesses,

but no sicknesses caused by lack of fluoride, not even in the teeth. Dr. William Hirzy putit this way: If this stuff gets out into the air, its a pollutant; if it gets into the river, its a

pollutant; if it gets into the lake, its a pollutant; but if it goes right straight into your drinking water system, its not a pollutant. Thats amazing! (13) The extremely reactivesubstance known as fluoride discourages the formation of glutamine and acetylcholine.This leads to a lowering of the mental resistance and makes the subject more susceptibleto manipulation; the subject becomes stupid and obedient. Which is why prisoners under the Communist and Nazi regimes were given fluoride in their drinking water. As regardsthe Nazis, that was done at the time on the recommendation of I.G Farben. (14) Here pa-

rallels can be drawn with the Pandremix adjuvants, which have an effect long after injec-tion a useful property since a self-serving government is looking for willing sheep. (15) The advantage of low concentrations of fluoride is that you dont die of them imme-diately, while this is not beyond the imagination in the case of squalene.

Dr. J. R. Jansma closed his book (12) with the memorable remark: It is time that the editor of the Maandblad tegen de Kwakzalverij (Monthly Journal against Quackery) should aim his sharp pen at fluoridation. If we can ever speak of pathetic quackery, then it is here. This remark also applies to the trashy doctorsof the World Health Organisation and company such as Ab Klink who havepushed Pandremix down our throats.


7/13

- 7 -

5 The Thalidomide Scandal

The morning sickness drug thalidomide (softenon) caused malformations with pregnantwomen who could give birth to babies without arms and legs, and sometimes internalorgans were missing. The substance was first developed by the Nazis as part of their che-mical weapons programme. Two separate academics revealed the discovery of documentsindicating that the drug did not originate with Chemie Grnenthal, the post-war Germanchemical firm, as has always been claimed. Dr Martin Johnson, director of the Thalido-mide Trust, providing help for the surviving victims in the UK, has written a paper de-tailing evidence proving that the drug existed before Grnenthal secured a patent for it in1954. The company has always maintained that thalidomide was created by chance in1953 by researchers who had tried to create an antihistamine but ended up with a tranquil-liser. Johnson suspects that it was actually first produced as a possible antidote to nervegases such as sarin, which was discovered by Otto Ambros and three other scientists. This

Nazi scientist joined Grnenthal after the war. It is now appearing increasingly likelythat thalidomide was the last war crime of the Nazis, said Johnson. The Argentineanauthor Carlos De Napoli, a writer of books on Nazis and the war, claims to have a copy of a document written in November 1944 by a director of I.G. Farben, which refers to thedevelopment of a substance, the chemical formula of which matches thalidomide. I.G.Farben, whose bosses, including Ambros, were convicted of war crimes such as slaveryand mass murder, ran the synthetic rubber and petrol processing plant at Auschwitz-Monowitz that drew its labour from theextermination camp. The patents suggest that thalidomide was probably one of anumber of products developed at Dyhern-

furth [a chemical laboratory] or Auschwitz- Monowitz in the course of nerve gas research. (16) Grnenthal was founded in

1946 by the soap manufacturers Alfred andHerman Wirtz, twins who were both former members of the Nazi party. Their chief scientist was Dr Heinrich Mckter, a fledg-ling pharmacologist who had carried outwartime experiments on Polish prisoners tofind a cure for typhus. He caused the deathof hundreds in the process. According toGrnenthal, Mckter was one of those res-

ponsible for inventing thalidomide. (17)

Fifty years after the thalidomide scandal, at-

tention is once again focused on the drug.Recently [that is to say: in December 2009]the governments of Sweden, Canada, Ireland and Italy decided to provide the victims world-wide 6,000, half of the original number with financial support. Currently inAustria discussions are being held, and last month Laurette Onkelinx, the Belgian Minis-ter of Health, received a number of victims and promised them a solution within veryshort notice. (She indeed kept promise: Four months later a new law was promulgated inBelgium that gave total compensation for important damages due to medical practice,irrespective of the cause, without requirement to go first to court. Onkelinx has expressedthe desire at the presentation of the law that victims should get indemnisation from thefund, established for the purpose, within one year after the deposition of their case.)

What is the heart of the matter? First, that Grnenthal carried out the tests themselves todetermine whether the product was safe. This was no simple matter since the negative


8/13

- 8 -

effects only occur within a two-week period during pregnancy. Chemie Grnenthalannounced that the product was safe in every respect and in September 1957 it was laun-ched with a great deal of publicity. However, the first thalidomide child had already been

born in 1956 to an employee of the company. In that period, before the launch of the pro-duct on the market, anxious employees addressed some hundreds of letters to manage-ment without any effect whatsoever.

Thalidomide was launched onto the market amidst a huge publicity campaign that fo-cused particularly on the fact that the product had not a single contra-indication: therewas no question of habituation and an overdose was impossible; it was the ideal substitutefor barbiturates (sedatives or sleeping pills). The commercial success was enormous andthe drug was sold in forty-six countries. Very soon thalidomide or what passed for it gained the third place in the league of the most sold indications in Europe. It was on salein Belgium from February 1959. And it was reaping rich rewards in profits: everyone wasswallowing it, often admixed with products such as aspirin and quinine.

Almost every country accepted the drug without question. But in the United States

permission was never given because themanufacturer was unable to provide re-search data showing that thalidomide washarmless. In France too there was greatcaution: it was allowed for sale for justone day! Despite such bans, it was spreadthroughout those countries by means of free samples, so that there too malformedchildren were born.

Because of its widespread use the causeof the problems brought about by thalido-

mide was difficult to determine. So it took time. During a convention of neurologists inDsseldorf in May 1960 the multiple nerve inflammation suffered by some patients was

pointed out, but it was not until September 1961 that the remarkable increase in thenumber of malformed babies was connected to this. When the Journal of the AmericanMedical Association and the renowned Lancet blew the whistle this was at first denied byGrnenthal because of the huge sums of money involved. But on 15 th November of thatyear a study was published by Dr. Widukind Lenz, which meant that it was no longer

possible to deny that thalidomide was implicated. Grnenthal gave up the fight and saleswere stopped in England as early as December. In Belgium however a temporary ban wasnot brought in until May 1962, under pressure of a gigantic scandal. A few days earlier

parents in Namur had killed their thalidomide child. During the court case it was statedthat the German Minister of Health had informed his Belgian counterpart of the dangersof thalidomide! The temporary ban meant that the existing stocks could be sold, and itwas not until 1963 that a definitive ban on sales was announced. And in that year toosome thalidomide babies were born

This heart-rending tale witnesses to one thing: the government is not there for us but for itself. And still is. What I have tried to show here is that what has happened with theswine flu vaccination was not an isolated case. A pattern, a frightening pattern, emerges.If it were not for my belief in God, in his salvific power, I would by now have lost allhope. The night is black. How my soul sighs for the dawn!

Hubert Luns

[Published in the Brandende Lamp, Winter 2009 No. 120]


9/13

- 9 -

Trafalgar Square London, thalidomide Memorial

Notes:

(1) The World Health Organisation insisted that the H1N1 vaccine should be given intwo doses, thereby increasing the risk of complications. This is the first time that a vac-cine has had to be repeated shortly after the first administration.

(2) The Dutch daily Nederlands Dagblad , 14 th August 2009: The cost of vaccinating theentire Dutch population against the swine flu amounts to a maximum of 700 millioneuros. Statement by Minister of Health Ab Klink on Friday following the meeting of the

ministers council. Finally 340 million was spent of which 252 million for vaccins andsyringes and the remainder for overhead.

(3) From March 2009 a fresh vaccination programme was started for girls aged 13 to 16.From September 2009 the human papilloma virus vaccine (Cervarix) against cervicalcancer has been included in the State Vaccination Programme for all 12-year-old girls.

(4) Interview Paris Match 2 nd December 2009: Les Survivants Belges du thalidomide(The Belgian survivors of thalidomide).

(5) It would appear from European Medicines Agency documents that the clinical testsrequired will only be performed subsequently, not by an independent body but by themanufacturers themselves, and then with the first target groups who have allowed them-selves to be vaccinated voluntarily. It has been revealed in Germany that members of thegovernment and the army were vaccinated with an adjuvant-free vaccine (press releasedated 14 th October 2009, following a court injunction taken out in Zwolle by SAN againstthe Dutch Ministry of Health and the CBG).

(6) Squalene is a precursor of cholesterol. Humans cannot live without squalene, be-cause it is an essential building block to make hormones and other substances. It alsopromotes a cell-mediated or Th1-type immune response. (Allison 1997) Squalene is alsofound in a variety of foods. Squalene is a naturally occurring substance found in plants,animals, and humans. It is manufactured in the liver of every human and circulates in our bloodstreams. The concentration naturally present in human blood is 250 parts per bil-lion. Based on research, it is clear that whether squalene causes harm or not is related toselected conditions of concentration, dose, route of application, and other factors likeemulsive or liquid state. (Benisek et al, 2004) The Pandremix vaccine contained 10.68 mgof squalene per 0.5 ml. This corresponds to 22 million parts per billion, which is on a to-tally different scale.


10/13

- 10 -

(7) In 2007 Minister J.M. Cramer requested Royal Haskoning to investigate the use inthe Netherlands of biocides forbidden by virtue of the legislation on pesticides. The study showed that the only substance permitted is 1,2-benzisothiazool-3-on. Thiomersal istherefore excluded. (Report 8-11-2007, ref. 9S4280.01/R0004/Nijm)

(8) See Lab 257 the disturbing story of the governments secret Plum Island Germ

Laboratory by Michael Christopher Carroll - William Morrow (an imprint of Harper-Collins), New York # 2004.

(9) During his nation-wide television speech in 1976 President Gerald Ford said literally:This virus was the cause of a pandemic in 1918 and 1919 that resulted in over half a mil-lion deaths in the United States, as well as twenty million deaths around the world. See President Ford's declaration on Swine Flue.1976.mov .

(10) FDA-tested batches of the vaccine at its production site in Michigan revealed tracesof squalene in several of the lots. These batches are being administered today (in 2003),under the current program. The Pentagon dismissed the finding, saying the levels found were so low as to be impossible to cause autoimmune reactions. What they failed to say was that squalene is subject to oxidation and peroxidation over time, so levels found afterseveral years would by definition be lower than original levels. Also, according to congres-sional testimony by Dr. Robert Garry of Tulane University on January 24, 2002, theanthrax bacillus is incapable of producing squalene because anthrax lipid chains are nomore than 17 carbons and monounsaturated, while squalene contains 30 carbons and ishighly polyunsaturated. In other words, it didnt just appear in the vaccine out of nowhere it was deliberately added. Complicating the matter, not every lot has squalene, and notevery manufactured group has been tested, so in a sense, the vaccine recipient is playingRussian Roulette with his or her life. (Source: Weve Got Those WMDs Right Here by Brian Cohn - LewRockwell.com # June 28, 2003)

(11) The Pentagons mandatory anthrax vaccine program was halted in October 2004 when Washington, D.C. federal Judge Emmet Sullivan cited the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) for failing to follow FDA medical licensing regulations. He issued a per-manent injunction directing DOD (Department of Defense) to stop giving the experimen-tal anthrax vaccine to military personnel without their voluntary, informed consent. InDecember 2005, the FDA issued a new Final Order declaring the vaccine safe and effec-tive, but failed to provide evidence the vaccine was effective against inhalation (weapo-nized) anthrax, and failed to address published research studies and 5,000 adverseevents reports received by the FDA demonstrating that the anthrax vaccine iscausing serious health problems. (Source: Gulf War Vets Home Page - National Vac-cine Information Center, Oct. 16, 2006: Vaccine safety advocates oppose Pentagon)Data from the militarys Defense Medical Surveillance System have shown that vaccinatedservice members had significantly elevated rates of heart attacks, several cancers, asthma,diabetes, Crohns Disease, psychoses, depression and blood clots, compared to prevacci-nation rates. A GAO Communication (U.S. Government Accountability Office) in July 2009 cited on p. 4 below CDC (U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) and mili-tary Vaccine Healthcare Center officials in the U.S.A., who said that 1 to 2 % of anthrax vaccine recipients may experience potentially disabling side effects or death. The Assis-tant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs concurred with the report.

The list of illnesses is far from being exhausted. The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Anthony Principi, admitted in August 1991 that the soldiers who had been vaccinated in1990 and 1991 had an increased risk of developing the fatal illness ALS (amyotrophic late-ral sclerosis), also known as Lou Gehrigs disease. Soldiers also suffered from polyarteritisnodosa, multiple sclerosis, lupus, transversal myelitis (an inflammation of the spine), en-docarditis (inflammation within the heart), optical neuritis and glomerulonephritis (akidney disease).

(12) Het Fiasco van de Fluoridering (The fiasco of fluoridation) by Dr. J.R. Jansma Published by De Driehoek # 1973 (p. 66). With regard to the nutritional pattern it can benoted that in Culemborg where there was no fluoride in the drinking water muchmore sugared yoghurt was eaten by the children than in Tiel. The study neglected thelong-term effects on teeth and general health. Twenty years after the study was closed, the


11/13

- 11 -

bad results for general public health in Tiel have been noted, made public in the media on5th November 1994. See: More news from Tiel and Culemborg .

(13) The Fluoride Deception by Christopher Bryson - Seven Stories Press, New York #2004 (p. 225).

(14) It is a little known fact that fluoride compounds were added to the drinking waterof prisoners to keep them docile and inhibit questioning of authority, both in Nazi prisoncamps in World War II and in the Soviet gulags in Siberia. This was said on CanadasConsumer Watchdog in a program called Marketplace, broadcast by the Canadian Broad-cast Company or the CBC (the national public radio and television broadcaster), Novem- ber 24, 1992, by Robert Carlton, Ph. D., a former scientist of the EPA (U.S. EnvironmentalProtection Agency). See The Fluoride Deception by Christopher Bryson # 2004. Seealso: Sodium Fluoride Obedience Drug , as well as: Fluoride Conspiracy . It was alsomentioned in the Address in Reply to the Governor's Speech to Parliament, as recordedin the Hansard of the state of Victoria (Australia) of 12 th August 1987, by Harley RiversDickinson, Liberal Party Member of the Victoria Parliament for South Barwon.

Scientists in the camps of both opponents and proponents of fluoride have alwaysdismissed this story as mere poppycock [says Hans Moolenburgh M.D. in the

Netherlands], but it had a life of its own and reared its head time and again. It fed thesuspicions of many people that there was more to fluoridation than meets the eye. At the time every Dutch doctor has a medical reference book for 1984. One of thechapters is entitled Tranquillisers. Looking at the Minor Tranquillisers I find twenty-four substances: their chemical formulae do not show any connection with fluoride.However, there is also a heading Major Tranquillisers. Of those there are 27, and 7 of them are a fluoride compound. One of these is semap. It is one of the strongest anti-psychotic substances we know. This means that 25% of the major tranquillisers areconnected with fluoride. I do not draw any conclusions. The only thing one can say atthis point is, with Alice: curiouser and curiouser! From an Article in NexusMagazine of Aug./Sept. 1995: Fluoridation - Mind Control of the Masses .

(15) You do not need to study conspiracies to discover what drives government and big

business. Instructive books, which do not mention the words conspiracy and Free-masonry are: War Against the Weak by Edwin Black # 2003; The Myth of the Good War by Jacques Pauwels # 2002; Seeds of Destruction by William Engdahl # 2007; asalso La dictature medico scientifique by Sylvie Simon from 1997.

(16) Thalidomide was developed as an experimental antidote to sarin poisoning. Sarin is anerve gas for use in warfare that is 500X more powerful than cyanide. But that does not yet prove that thalidomide could not be a good medication; there have been applicationsfound for it, such as against certain complications of leprosy. This is the way it is. In orderto test the effectiveness, Jewish victims were exposed to the deadly poison and then weregiven an effective (perhaps) antidote.

(17) The whole section with some minor changes is from TIMESONLINE, Febr. 8, 2009

under Thalidomide was created by the Nazis by Daniel Foggo and Declan McGar- vey. Ambros was convicted to only eight years for his participation in the decision to useZyklon B to kill the Jews in the gas chambers. He was soon released to serve as advisor inthe US Army Chemical Corps.


12/13

- 12 -

APPENDIX

FROM IMMUNOLOGY TO SOCIAL POLICY: EPISTEMOLOGY

AND ETHICS IN THE CREATION AND ADMINISTRATION OF

PAEDIATRIC VACCINES

BY

ARLETTE MERCAE B.A. (HONS.) Dip. Ed.

Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements

for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy

University of Tasmania

April 2003


13/13

- 13 -

Excerpt on the use of squalene (pp. 83-84)

Recently much attention has been paid to the use of emulsions, in water, of squalene or squalane. Squalene is a naturally occurring precursor of cholesterol, while squalane is asaturated and more stable form that occurs naturally in sebaceous secretions. They arethought to have a similar effect to that of liposomes, and appear to promote a cell media-ted or Th1 type immune response. (Allison 1997) They are the basis of adjuvants such asSAF, Ribi adjuvant, and MF59. (Allison 1995)

Of these, MF59 and SAF have appeared promising for human use. (Gellin 1998)

MF59 is a safe, practical, and potent adjuvant for use with human vaccines. Theformulation is easily manufactured . . . and is both compatible and efficacious withall antigens to date. MF59 has been shown to be a potent stimulator of cellular andhumoral responses to subunit antigens in both animal models and clinical studies.Toxicology studies in animal models and Phase I-III studies in humans havedemonstrated the safety of MF59 (Ott et al 1998, p 294)

However, squalene has been used extensively as an adjuvant in animal models to induceautoimmune diseases. (Asa, Cao & Garry 2000, p 61) Recent research into Gulf War Syndrome, a multisystemic illness affecting many Gulf War-era veterans (Asa, Cao &Garry 2000) showed that 95% of overtly ill troops who were deployed, and 100% of those who were immunized but not deployed, had antibodies to squalene. Antibodies tosqualene were not detectable in the general public, or in Gulf War Veterans who were notill.

Two control subjects who volunteered to participate in a vaccine trial at the United States National Institutes of Health developed a multisystem disorder similar to that of Gulf War Syndrome. The trial involved the use of a squalene-containing adjuvant.

One person:

received a single injection and became ill within 3 weeks, with signs andsymptoms including arthritis, fibromyalgia, lymphadenopathy, photosensitive rashes,fatigue, headaches and fasciculations. This patient had lower than normalacetylcholinesterase and histological evidence of IgG-mediated demyelinization. The

NIH vaccine study code was broken; only adjuvant containing squalene had beenadministered as a placebo [The second person] went through the completeexperimental vaccination protocol before manifesting a similar set of signs andsymptoms and was +3 for ASA [antisqualene antibodies]. (Asa, Cao & Garry2000, p 62)

The study therefore suggests evidence of an immune factor based upon the adjuvancy of squalene (p. 62) in the aetiology in these cases of multisystemic illness, and this wouldindicate that great care needs to be taken with the use of even apparently natural adju-vants. This is for two reasons. Firstly there are considerable variations in individual im-mune responses, and secondly adjuvants are designed to stimulate the immune system,and in such a complex system it is possible, that in some individuals, an adjuvant may actto upset the balance of various mechanisms which regulate autoimmune responses, thusleading to autoimmune disease. (Nakamura & Nakamura 1992; Shoenfeld & Aron-Maor 2000)

russian roulette—the swine flue vaccinations - hubert_luns

Documents