russian m&a review h1 2015h1 2011 h1 2012 h1 2013 h1 2014 h1 2015 28.4 33.9 36.9 43.4 52.9 22.2...

16
Russian M&A Review H1 2015 July 2015

Upload: others

Post on 24-May-2020

21 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Russian M&A Review H1 2015h1 2011 h1 2012 h1 2013 h1 2014 h1 2015 28.4 33.9 36.9 43.4 52.9 22.2 128 151 179 123 397 217 2010 q1 2010 q2 2010 q3 2010 q4 2011 q1 2011 q2 2011 q3 2011

Russian M&A Review H1 2015

July 2015

Page 2: Russian M&A Review H1 2015h1 2011 h1 2012 h1 2013 h1 2014 h1 2015 28.4 33.9 36.9 43.4 52.9 22.2 128 151 179 123 397 217 2010 q1 2010 q2 2010 q3 2010 q4 2011 q1 2011 q2 2011 q3 2011

HeadlinesRussian M&A fell 58% to USD22.2 billion in H1 2015; the lowest level for six years

Headline value of M&A flattered by USD7 billion Stroygazconsulting acquisition

Activity virtually halved to 217 deals yet still well above H1 2010–2013 levels

Average transaction size fell by 30% to USD131 million

81% of all deals were valued at less than USD100 million

Indications suggest that M&A may only reach USD32–43 billion in 2015

2 | Russian M&A Review H1 2015

© 2015 JSC “KPMG”. All rights reserved.

Page 3: Russian M&A Review H1 2015h1 2011 h1 2012 h1 2013 h1 2014 h1 2015 28.4 33.9 36.9 43.4 52.9 22.2 128 151 179 123 397 217 2010 q1 2010 q2 2010 q3 2010 q4 2011 q1 2011 q2 2011 q3 2011

Domestic M&A particularly weak with ENR industries

falling to a new H1 low

Innovation & technology was a hot sector, albeit with low

absolute M&A investment

Inbound M&A stable at USD5 billion but influx of Asian investment yet to

materialise

North America and Europe remained no.1 destinations for outbound

investment

Private Equity activity remains high with DST Global and AFK Sistema key players

Headlines

Russian M&A Review H1 2015 | 3

© 2015 JSC “KPMG”. All rights reserved.

Page 4: Russian M&A Review H1 2015h1 2011 h1 2012 h1 2013 h1 2014 h1 2015 28.4 33.9 36.9 43.4 52.9 22.2 128 151 179 123 397 217 2010 q1 2010 q2 2010 q3 2010 q4 2011 q1 2011 q2 2011 q3 2011

Russian M&A totalled just USD22.2 billion in H1 2015, 58% lower than the prior year. Activity was down by 45% to 217 deals, although this was still well above the level seen in 2010-2013

Q1 2015 saw the value of deals announced fall to the lowest since level since Q3 2010 as confidence in Russia’s economy weakened

With activity levels on a downward quarter-on-quarter trend since Q4 2014 it remains to be seen if the slowdown in activity continues into the normally quieter summer months

H1 2015 M&A fell to its lowest level for six years as activity almost halved

4 | Russian M&A Review H1 2015

© 2015 JSC “KPMG”. All rights reserved.

H1 deal value and volume (2010 to 2015)

Source: KPMG analysis

Quarterly deal value (2010 to 2015) (USDbn)

Source: KPMG analysis

Quarterly deal volume (2010 to 2015)

Source: KPMG analysis

H1 2010

Deal value, USDbn Number of deals

H1 2011 H1 2012 H1 2013 H1 2014 H1 2015

28.4 33.9 36.9 43.4 52.9 22.2

128151

179

123

397

21720

10 Q

120

10 Q

220

10 Q

320

10 Q

420

11 Q

120

11 Q

220

11 Q

320

11 Q

420

12 Q

120

12 Q

220

12 Q

320

12 Q

420

13 Q

120

13 Q

220

13 Q

320

13 Q

420

14 Q

120

14 Q

220

14 Q

320

14 Q

420

15 Q

120

15 Q

2

10.1 18

.35.2

63.9

21.2

12.7

14.0 24

.912

.824

.019

.180

.216

.227

.322

.150

.422

.3 30.6

18.8

8.8 7.115

.1

2010

Q1

2010

Q2

2010

Q3

2010

Q4

2011

Q1

2011

Q2

2011

Q3

2011

Q4

2012

Q1

2012

Q2

2012

Q3

2012

Q4

2013

Q1

2013

Q2

2013

Q3

2013

Q4

2014

Q1

2014

Q2

2014

Q3

2014

Q4

2015

Q1

2015

Q2

48

8063

79 75 76 74 83 8297

7386

56 67 72

131

193 204

113134 126

91

Page 5: Russian M&A Review H1 2015h1 2011 h1 2012 h1 2013 h1 2014 h1 2015 28.4 33.9 36.9 43.4 52.9 22.2 128 151 179 123 397 217 2010 q1 2010 q2 2010 q3 2010 q4 2011 q1 2011 q2 2011 q3 2011

Market transparency further improved, although average deal size declined

Deals valued above USD500 million accounted for 61% of total Russian M&A (H1 2014: 68%) but just 5% of deal volume with values disclosed (H1 2014: 8%)

Transactions of less than USD100 million accounted for 81% of deals with values disclosed in H1 2015, up from 74% in the prior year

Market transparency continued its improving trend with transaction values disclosed for 78% (169) of all deals in H1 2015, up from 71% (282) in the prior year

However, as the market contracted amongst a small number of large deals, the average transaction value fell by 30% to USD131 million

Russian M&A Review H1 2015 | 5

© 2015 JSC “KPMG”. All rights reserved.

Source: KPMG analysis

H1 2015H1 2014Number of deals with undisclosed valueNumber of deals with disclosed value

29% 22%

71% 78%

Market transparency Average transaction value

(USDm)188

131

H1 2015H1 2014

M&A by transaction value (USDbn)

Deal volume by transaction value

2bn<10bn 500m<2bn 250m<500m 100m<250m 25m<100m ≥5m<25m

H1 2015

H1 2014

H1 2015

H1 2014

Source: KPMG analysis

1.12.5

2.5

2.6

6.5

18.1

5.1

5.5

4.61.4

18.17.0

1

3

7

198

1517

36117

86

50 92

–30%

Page 6: Russian M&A Review H1 2015h1 2011 h1 2012 h1 2013 h1 2014 h1 2015 28.4 33.9 36.9 43.4 52.9 22.2 128 151 179 123 397 217 2010 q1 2010 q2 2010 q3 2010 q4 2011 q1 2011 q2 2011 q3 2011

The ten largest deals accounted for 65% of total Russian M&A in H1 2015, compared to 52% in the previous year, as the market was weighted toward a small number of larger deals

April saw the largest deal announced, Gazprombank and United Capital Partners USD7.0 billion acquisition of Stroygazconsulting

The oil and gas sector accounted for five of the ten largest deals in H1 2015, including Schlumberger’s proposed acquisition of Eurasia Drilling which has yet to be approved by FAS

Yuri Milner’s Digital Sky Technologies was involved in USD0.9 billion of investment into the innovation & technology sector in H1 2015

Deal value was further concentrated amongst a few large deals in H1 2015

Russian M&A largest deals in H1 2015

# Target Sector Acquirer Vendor % acquired

Value USDm

1 Stroygazconsulting T&IGazprombank & United Capital Partners Advisory

Ruslan Baysarov & Ziyad Manasir 100.0% 7,000

2 Eurasia Drilling Company O&G Schlumberger

Limited Not disclosed 45.7% 1,474

3 Uralkali Chem Uralkali Not disclosed 11.6% 1,086

4 Orsknefteorgsintez O&G Mikhail Gutseriev & Forteinvest

Sermules Enterprises, Igor Shkolnik, & Cipation Holdings

77.2% 1,000

5 RussNeft NK O&G Glencore PLC Mikhail Gutseriev 49.0% 900

6 Tatneft O&G Not disclosed Not disclosed 6.1% 801

7 Taas-Yuriakh Neftegazodobycha O&G BP PLC Rosneft Oil

Company 20.0% 750

8 Wish I&T DST Global Not disclosed 16.7% 500

9 Mobile TeleSystems C&M Lazard Ltd Not disclosed 4.7% 439

10 ANI Technologies I&T Investor group1 Not disclosed 16.7% 400

Ten largest transactions total 14,350

As a % of total Russian M&A 64.7%

Note: (1) DST Global; Tiger Global Management; Falcon Edge Capital; Softbank Corp; GIC Pte Ltd; Accel Partners; Rahul Mehta; Yuri Milner; Steadview Capital Management HK Ltd.

6 | Russian M&A Review H1 2015

© 2015 JSC “KPMG”. All rights reserved.

H1 2015H1 2014

Other deal valueTop 10 deal value

48%35%

52%65%

Market concentration

Source: KPMG analysis

Page 7: Russian M&A Review H1 2015h1 2011 h1 2012 h1 2013 h1 2014 h1 2015 28.4 33.9 36.9 43.4 52.9 22.2 128 151 179 123 397 217 2010 q1 2010 q2 2010 q3 2010 q4 2011 q1 2011 q2 2011 q3 2011

M&A was focused on the transport & infrastructure, and oil and gas sectors

The transport & infrastruc-ture, and oil & gas, sectors accounted for 61% of Russian M&A in H1 2015 however, investment was highly concentrated in a small number of large deals:n The acquisition of

Stroygazconsulting accounted for 91% of transport & infrastructure M&A; while

n The five largest deals in the sector accounted for 85% of oil & gas M&A

Real estate & construction remained the most active sector with 52 deals, less than half the H1 2014 volume

Innovation & technology saw a 36% increase in activity, with a total of 34 transactions

Russian M&A Review H1 2015 | 7

© 2015 JSC “KPMG”. All rights reserved.

M&A by sector (USDbn) Deal volume by sector

H1 2015

H1 2014

H1 2015

H1 2014

Source: KPMG analysis

0.7

0.60.4

0.50.81.0

1.4

1.9

2.1

5.8

7.76.28.4

2.02.81.8

3.31.7

6.4

19.5

25

911

15

17

1718 19

34

52

118

2535

132938

28

37

18

56

Transport and infrastructureOil and gasReal estate and constructionInnovations and technologyChemicalsMetals and miningConsumer marketsCommunications and mediaBanking and insuranceAgricultureOther markets

Page 8: Russian M&A Review H1 2015h1 2011 h1 2012 h1 2013 h1 2014 h1 2015 28.4 33.9 36.9 43.4 52.9 22.2 128 151 179 123 397 217 2010 q1 2010 q2 2010 q3 2010 q4 2011 q1 2011 q2 2011 q3 2011

Although domestic M&A continued to account for two thirds of deal value, the total invested declined by 58% to USD15.0 billion as concerns over the economic outlook mounted and activity fell by over half to 144 deals

Although the number of inbound deals declined by 36%, activity returned to the H1 2011 to H1 2013 level, and encouragingly the value of M&A remained broadly stable at USD4.8 billion

Outbound activity declined by 21% as the value of M&A returned to 2013 levels after the peak of capital outflows in H1 2014 (USD12.1 billion)

Inbound M&A remained stable despite a decline in deal volume

8 | Russian M&A Review H1 2015

© 2015 JSC “KPMG”. All rights reserved.

M&A market by region M&A market volume by region

Source: KPMG analysis

Domestic Inbound Outbound

H1 2015

H1 2014

H1 2015

H1 2014

2.5

12.1

4.8

5.0

35.815.0

4456

29

296144

44

Page 9: Russian M&A Review H1 2015h1 2011 h1 2012 h1 2013 h1 2014 h1 2015 28.4 33.9 36.9 43.4 52.9 22.2 128 151 179 123 397 217 2010 q1 2010 q2 2010 q3 2010 q4 2011 q1 2011 q2 2011 q3 2011

Domestic M&A in the normally strong ENR industries reached a new low

The acquisition of Stroygazconsulting accounted for almost half of all domestic M&A in H1 2015

M&A in the ENR industries (metals & mining, oil & gas, and power & utilities) fell by 81% to USD3.3 billion, the lowest level in a decade

Uralkali’s USD1.1 billion share buy-back, the largest deal in the chemicals sector, saw Onexim, free-float and treasury shareholders reduce their holding in the company

Mikhail Gutseriev’s USD1 billion acquisition of a 77.19% stake in refinery operator Orsknefteorgsintez was the largest in the oil & gas sector

Real estate & construction remained the most active domestic sector, accounting for almost a third of all deals

Russian M&A Review H1 2015 | 9

© 2015 JSC “KPMG”. All rights reserved.

Domestic M&A by sector (USDbn)

Domestic volume by sector

H1 2015

H1 2014

H1 2015

H1 2014

Source: KPMG analysis

Transport and infrastructureOil and gasReal estate and constructionInnovations and technologyChemicalsMetals and miningConsumer marketsCommunications and mediaBanking and insurancePower and utilitiesOther markets

0.6

0.3 0.2

0.8

1.4

1.97.5

2.2

5.6 6.2

5.0

11.8

5.1

0.60.80.7

22

7

8

8

10

12 15

16

4659

14

27

2415 22

236

106

Page 10: Russian M&A Review H1 2015h1 2011 h1 2012 h1 2013 h1 2014 h1 2015 28.4 33.9 36.9 43.4 52.9 22.2 128 151 179 123 397 217 2010 q1 2010 q2 2010 q3 2010 q4 2011 q1 2011 q2 2011 q3 2011

Schlumberger (Eurasia Drilling), Glencore (RussNeft NK) and BP’s (Taas-Yuriakh Neftegazodobycha) acquisitions accounted for all but USD0.1 billion of inbound M&A in the oil & gas sector

Although the real estate & construction, and innovation & technology sectors saw the same number of deals as the oil & gas sector, the level of investment was far smaller

North America and Europe accounted for 85% and 55% of inbound M&A and deal volume respectively

The long-awaited influx of investment from Asia Pacific has yet to materialise, with M&A at USD0.1 billion

Inbound M&A remained in line with the recent historic trend

10 | Russian M&A Review H1 2015

© 2015 JSC “KPMG”. All rights reserved.

Inbound M&A by sector (USDbn)

Inbound volume by sector

Source: KPMG analysis

Oil and gasConsumer marketsCommunications and mediaTransport and infrastructureReal estate and construction

H1 2015

H1 2014

H1 20150.1

0.20.2

0.2

0.5

0.5

3.2

0.3

1.0

0.20.3

0.13.1

H1 2014

5

5

53

2

36

5

2

24

76

14

2 3

Inbound M&A by region (USDbn)

Inbound volume by region

Source: KPMG analysis

North America EuropeCISAsia-PacificOther

H1 2015

H1 2014

H1 2015

H1 2014

Innovations and technologyAgricultureBanking and insuranceOther markets

0.30.10.3

1.9

2.2

0.81.5

0.1

1.6

1.0

5

5

3

6

10

61

7

8

23

Page 11: Russian M&A Review H1 2015h1 2011 h1 2012 h1 2013 h1 2014 h1 2015 28.4 33.9 36.9 43.4 52.9 22.2 128 151 179 123 397 217 2010 q1 2010 q2 2010 q3 2010 q4 2011 q1 2011 q2 2011 q3 2011

Outbound M&A was focused on the innovation & technology sector

Outbound M&A returned to H1 2013 levels in the absence of large deals seen during H1 2014 such as LetterOne’s USD7.1 billion acquisition of RWE Dea (Europe), and Polymetal’s USD1.1 billion acquisition of Altynalmas Gold (CIS)

Innovation & technology sector attracted the largest share of outbound M&A, driven by private equity investors who account for all but three deals in the sector

North America and Europe remained the primary destinations for outbound M&A, with investment into Asia Pacific remaining six times greater than the level of inbound M&A

Russian M&A Review H1 2015 | 11

© 2015 JSC “KPMG”. All rights reserved.

Outbound M&A by sector (USDbn)

Outbound volume by sector

Source: KPMG analysis

H1 2015

H1 2014

H1 2015

H1 2014

Outbound M&A by region (USDbn)

Outbound volume by region

Source: KPMG analysis

North America EuropeCISAsia-PacificOther

H1 2015

H1 2014

H1 2015

H1 2014

Innovations and technologyOil and gasReal estate and constructionMetals and miningConsumer markets

Healthcare and pharmaceuticalsBanking and insuranceCommunications and mediaOther markets

0.10.10.2

0.2

0.41.6

1.1

1.0

0.5 0.9 0.8

7.4

0.20.2

3

3

6

11

1

4

6

19

69

7

3

10 6

4

3

8

0.1

0.6

0.8

0.90.2

9.4

0.40.61.5

5

4

17

1826

8

3

13

6

Page 12: Russian M&A Review H1 2015h1 2011 h1 2012 h1 2013 h1 2014 h1 2015 28.4 33.9 36.9 43.4 52.9 22.2 128 151 179 123 397 217 2010 q1 2010 q2 2010 q3 2010 q4 2011 q1 2011 q2 2011 q3 2011

Private Equity (PE) M&A increased by 62% in H1 2015 to USD10.4 billion due largely to the Stroygazconsulting acquisition – with a small increase in deal activity

The underlying value of PE M&A, excluding the Stroygazconsulting deal, fell by 47% to USD3.4 billion

Acquisitions accounted for 89% of PE deals, up from 71% in H1 2014. Over half (24) of acquisitions were in the innovation & technology sector, of which two thirds (16) were outbound deals

Yuri Milner’s DST Global (6) and AFK Sistema (5) were the most active PE investors during the period

Private Equity M&A was flattered by the Stroygazconsulting acquisition

12 | Russian M&A Review H1 2015

© 2015 JSC “KPMG”. All rights reserved.

Source: KPMG analysis

H1 Private Equity deal value and volume (2010 to 2015)

Private Equity M&A by deal type (USDbn)

H1

2010

Deal value, USDbn Number of deals

H1

2011

H1

2012

H1

2013

H1

2014

H1

2015

2.0

16

5.8 4.3 9.4 6.4 10.4

22

30

19

4953

H1 2014 H1 2015

53

49

Aquisition Exit

Number of dealsSecondary

3.6 10.3

0.7

2.0

0.1

Private Equity M&A by sector (USDbn)

Private Equity volume by sector

H1 2015

H1 2014

H1 2015

H1 2014

0.10.10.10.40.4

0.5

1.7

7.2

2.00.7

0.8

1.40.21.00.2

322

3

4

4

56

24

8

3

10

82

6

8

4

Transport and infrastructureInnovations and technologyConsumer marketsCommunications and mediaReal estate and construction

Source: KPMG analysis

Power and utilitiesBanking and insuranceHealthcare and pharmaceuticalsOther markets

Page 13: Russian M&A Review H1 2015h1 2011 h1 2012 h1 2013 h1 2014 h1 2015 28.4 33.9 36.9 43.4 52.9 22.2 128 151 179 123 397 217 2010 q1 2010 q2 2010 q3 2010 q4 2011 q1 2011 q2 2011 q3 2011

Indications suggest that M&A may only reach USD32-43 billion in 2015

The market cap of Russia’s largest companies fell by 31% in the last year, while analysts expect predicted forward P/E and net debt/EBITDA ratios to decline by 8% in the coming year

Monthly deal volumes have fallen sharply, and appear to be heading toward the 2010 to 2013 trend in H2 2015

The number of rumoured deals was 38% lower in H1 2015 than the previous year. Between 2010 and 2014, the ratio of H2 announced to H1 rumoured deals averaged 2:3

At least one deal in excess of USD2 billion has been announced in H2 since 2009

Our analysis indicates that Russian M&A may fall to USD32–43 billion in 2015; below our previous estimate of USD40–50 billion

Russian M&A Review H1 2015 | 13

© 2015 JSC “KPMG”. All rights reserved.

Source: KPMG analysisScenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3

2.0

7.6

22.2

3.89.6

22.2

7.4

13.6

22.2

Actual H1Run-rate H2Huge deal H2

Source: KPMG analysis

Private Equity M&A by sector (USDbn)

Monthly deal volume (2010–2015)

June 2014

June 2015

+12% +13%+5%

–31%

–8% –8%

MARKET CAP Largest companies

APPETITE (Forward P/E ratios)

CAPACITY (Net debt/EBITDA)

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

2010 2011 20122013 2014 2015

Note: (1) June 2014 reflects 16 companies, and June 2015 11 companies – see methodology

Average 165 deals (H2 2010–2013)

91314

16

16

1721

26

27

41

258292 276

322

200210

142 157 159 247 1362032010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Average 2 announced to 3 rumoured deals

H1 rumoured H2 announced

Telecoms, media & technologyConsumer marketsInnovations and technologyReal estate and construction

Energy, mining & utilitiesFinancial servicesTransport & leisureAgricultureBusiness servicesPharmaceutical, medial & biotechnology

Source: KPMG analysis

H1 rumoured versus H2 anounced deals

2015 forecast M&A outturn

Note: (a) 2015 indicative announced deals based on average ratio of announced to rumoured deals between 2010-2014Source: (1) Rumoured deals per mergermarket Intelligence Heat Chart of companies

for sale between 1st January and 30th June, and deals announced between 1st July and 31st December per the KPMG deals database in each year

Note: (1) See methodology for details of individuals scenarios (2) KPMG Russian M&A Review 2014

Page 14: Russian M&A Review H1 2015h1 2011 h1 2012 h1 2013 h1 2014 h1 2015 28.4 33.9 36.9 43.4 52.9 22.2 128 151 179 123 397 217 2010 q1 2010 q2 2010 q3 2010 q4 2011 q1 2011 q2 2011 q3 2011

KPMG Russian M&A databaseThis report is based on the KPMG Russian M&A database which includes

transactions where either the target (inbound) or acquirer (outbound) or both (domestic) are Russian.

All data is based on transactions completed between 1st January and 30th June 2015, or announced during this period but pending at 30th June.

Historical data may differ from earlier versions of this report as the KPMG Russian M&A database is updated retrospectively for lapsed deals and

information subsequently made public.

Data includes transactions valued in excess of USD5 million, as well as transactions with undisclosed deal values where the target’s turnover exceeds

USD10 million. Deal values are based on company press releases as well as market estimates disclosed in the public domain.

The KPMG Russian M&A database has been complied over a number of years based on information included in the Mergermarket M&A deals and

EMIS DealWatch, together with KPMG desktop research of other sources.

Allocation of deals to industry sectors may involve using our judgement and is therefore subjective. We have not extensively verified all data within

the KPMG Russian M&A database, and cannot be held responsible for its accuracy or completeness.

Analysis of different databases and information sources may yield deviating results from those presented in this report.

Methodology

14 | Russian M&A Review H1 2015

© 2015 JSC “KPMG”. All rights reserved.

Page 15: Russian M&A Review H1 2015h1 2011 h1 2012 h1 2013 h1 2014 h1 2015 28.4 33.9 36.9 43.4 52.9 22.2 128 151 179 123 397 217 2010 q1 2010 q2 2010 q3 2010 q4 2011 q1 2011 q2 2011 q3 2011

METHODOLOGY

KPMG M&A PredictorKPMG’s M&A Predictor is a forward-looking tool that looks at the appetite and capacity for M&A deals by tracking and projecting important indicators 12 months forward. The rise or fall of forward P/E (price/earnings) ratios offers a good guide to the overall market confidence, while net debt to EBITDA (earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization) ratios helps gauge the capacity of companies to fund future deals.

The Predictor covers the world by sector and region. It is produced twice a year, using data comprising 1,000 of the largest companies in the world by market capitalization. The August 2014 edition included data for 16 Russian companies, and the August 2015 edition 11. The financial services and property sectors are excluded from our analysis, as net debt/EBITDA ratios are not considered relevant in these industries. All the raw data within the Predictor is sourced from S&P Capital IQ. Where possible, earnings and EBITDA data is on a pre-exceptionals basis.

Mergermarket Intelligence Heat ChartThe Intelligence Heat Chart is based on ‘Companies for Sale’ tracked by mergermarket in Russia between 1st January and 30th June, each year. Opportunities are captured according to the dominant geography and sector of the potential target company, with predicted deal flow based on the intelligence collected in mergermarket’s database relating to companies rumoured to be up for sale, or officially up for sale in Russia.

It is therefore is indicative of areas that are likely to be active in the months to come. The intelligence comes from a range of sources, including press reports, company statements and mergermarket’s own team of journalist gathering proprietary intelligence from M&A practitioners aacross the region. The data does not differentiate between small and large transactions nor between deals that could happen in the short or long-term.

Data for Russia was extracted from mergermarket’s Deal Drivers EMEA half year edition for 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015.

2015 forecast M&A outturnDuring H1 2015, the underlying average transaction value was USD70.3 million (excluding the USD7 billion acquisition of Stroygazconsulting).

Since 2009, 23 huge Russian M&A deals, those valued at >USD2 billion and <USD10 billion, have been announced during H2, with at least one in each year. Over this period, 4 mega Russian M&A deals, those valued at >USD10 billion, were announced. For the purposes of our analysis, mega deals are considered to be exceptional and have therefore been excluded.

We have forecast Russian M&A for H2 2015 based on the following three scenarios:

• Scenario 1: run-rate of USD7.6 billion based on the minimum ratio of H2 announced to H1 rumoured deals between 2010 and 2014(2011: 53.8%) multiplied by H1 2015 rumoured deals (200), multipled by the underlying H1 2015 average transaction value (USD70.3 million), plus one huge deal based on the smallest H2 huge deal (USD2 billion) between 2010 and 2014

• Scenario 2: run-rate of USD9.6 billion based on the average ratio of H2 announced to H1 rumoured deals between 2010 and 2014 (68%) multiplied by H1 2015 rumoured deals (200), multipled by the underlying H1 2015 average transaction value (USD70.3 million), plus one huge deal based on the average transaction value of H2 huge deals (USD3.8 billion) between 2010 and 2014

• Scenario 2: run-rate of USD13.6 billion based on the maximum ratio of H2 announced to H1 rumoured deals between 2010 and 2014(2013: 96.7%) multiplied by H1 2015 rumoured deals (200), multipled by the underlying H1 2015 average transaction value (USD70.3 million), plus one huge deal based on the largest H2 huge deals (USD7.4 billion) between 2010 and 2014

Russian M&A Review H1 2015 | 15

© 2015 JSC “KPMG”. All rights reserved.

Page 16: Russian M&A Review H1 2015h1 2011 h1 2012 h1 2013 h1 2014 h1 2015 28.4 33.9 36.9 43.4 52.9 22.2 128 151 179 123 397 217 2010 q1 2010 q2 2010 q3 2010 q4 2011 q1 2011 q2 2011 q3 2011

The information contained herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavour to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation.

© 2015 JSC “KPMG”, a company incorporated under the Laws of the Russian Federation, a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. Printed in Russia.

The KPMG name, logo and “cutting through complexity” are registered trademarks or trademarks of KPMG International.

Contact us

Sean TiernanHead of Advisory PartnerT: + 7 495 937 4477 E: [email protected]

Lydia PetrashovaHead of Deal AdvisoryPartnerT: + 7 495 937 4477 E: [email protected]

Peter LatosHead of Private EquityDirectorT: + 7 495 937 4477 E: [email protected]

www.kpmg.ru