rural urban migrant poverty (rump) role of infrastructure in poverty eradication

14
Rural-urban Migrant Poverty (RUMP) Opportunities for using Infrastructure Development as a poverty alleviation strategy Mthokozisi Sidambe November 2010

Upload: mthokozisi-sidambe

Post on 09-May-2015

3.464 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Poverty knows no boundaries! It is transient

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Rural urban  migrant poverty (rump)  role of infrastructure in poverty eradication

Rural-urban Migrant Poverty (RUMP)

Opportunities for using Infrastructure Development

as a poverty alleviation strategy

Mthokozisi Sidambe

November 2010

Page 2: Rural urban  migrant poverty (rump)  role of infrastructure in poverty eradication

PURPOSE OF THE PRESENTATION

• To examine dynamics of rural-urban migrant poverty (RUMP).

• Identify implications of RUMP and gaps in development policy and practice.

• Identify further focus areas - for research, debate and policy consideration.

• Challenge development practitioners to reconsider/formulate poverty alleviation strategies that address RUMP.

Page 3: Rural urban  migrant poverty (rump)  role of infrastructure in poverty eradication

INTRODUCTION

• Its been observed that, in extreme conditions, the poor “vote with their feet” – they migrate from rural to urban areas and vice-versa.

• The link between poverty and rural-urban migration (RUM) is not always clearly articulated or embedded into development strategies.

• Rural-urban dichotomy disguises the realities of rural-urban migrant poverty = development strategies continue to treat the rural & urban as distinct spaces & ignore the continuum of poverty.

• SA’s internal rural-urban migration (RUM) takes place within a context of intensifying rural development efforts, shrinking urban-based employment opportunities and poor (urban) service delivery.

Page 4: Rural urban  migrant poverty (rump)  role of infrastructure in poverty eradication

INTRODUCTION (Cont…)

• The effect of rural-urban migration on total urban poverty needs thorough examination. Poverty, measured in terms of current income, may not capture current living conditions and the long term poverty of rural migrant households.

• Issues of rural-urban migration have not been properly treated by/through current development strategies, e.g. urban housing challenges are hardly linked to rural development. On the other hand, lack of a holistic rural development approach continues = rural development biased towards agriculture.

• Knowledge of rural-urban interface and the extent to which migrant workers currently live under poverty is vital for development and poverty alleviation targeting.

Page 5: Rural urban  migrant poverty (rump)  role of infrastructure in poverty eradication

Source: CSIR 2007; www.csir.co.za

URBAN AND RURAL LINKAGES AND INTERDEPENDENCIES

Urban & Rural Linkages & InterdependenciesUrban Rural

Agric. TradeTransport centre

Agric. Production

Agric. Support Services• Production inputs• Repair services

• Information on production• Methods (innovation)

Agriculture Intensification• Rural infrastructure

• Production incentives• Education and capacity to

• adopt• And adapt innovation

Non-Agric. Consumer Markets• Processed agric. Products

• Private services• Public services (health, educ & admin)

Rural income and demandFor non-agriculture goods

And services

Agro-based industry

Non- agro-based Employment

Cash crop production And agricultural

diversification

All of the Above

Page 6: Rural urban  migrant poverty (rump)  role of infrastructure in poverty eradication

POSITIVE RURAL-URBAN INTERFACE

Rural Side

• Access to farming assets (including land)

• Market for rural produced goods and services

• Diversification of rural livelihoods (to non-farm activities,

e.g. sand abstraction, rural tourism, etc)

• Remittances

Urban side

• Increase in labour pool and non-farm employment

opportunities

• Expanded markets

• Economies of scale in production and provision of goods

and services

Inte

rlinke

d fo

rtun

es

Page 7: Rural urban  migrant poverty (rump)  role of infrastructure in poverty eradication

NEGATIVE RURAL-URBAN INTERFACE

Rural Side

• Export-oriented farming activities

• Limited opportunities for non-farm livelihood diversification

• Decline in small-farm production

• Environmental externalities (e.g. uncontrolled land abstraction)

Urban side

• Increased influx of migrants from poor rural areas

• Increase in “free riders” = overstretching of services

• Social and economic vices e.g. crime leading to low investment

• Exclusion/marginalisation of poor rural-urban migrants

Page 8: Rural urban  migrant poverty (rump)  role of infrastructure in poverty eradication

HSRC’s social need index• Population/ health facilities• Road length/ km2

• Population density• Electricity and water provision• Dependency ratio• Pupil/ teacher ratio• Unemployment• Poverty gap• Etc.

HighMed-highMediumMed-lowLow

POVERTY & SPATIAL MOBILITY; SA

Source: CSIR 2007; www.csir.co.za

Page 9: Rural urban  migrant poverty (rump)  role of infrastructure in poverty eradication

RUMP IMPLICATIONS

The mobile Poor

More risk If young,

single & female

Social &Economic

marginalisation&/or exclusion

Asset poverty

= Poor housing,Infrastructure &

services

Social capital dependency

Income poverty = result of 3G jobs (disgraceful, dirty, and dangerous).

Page 10: Rural urban  migrant poverty (rump)  role of infrastructure in poverty eradication

EMERGING CHALLENGES FROM CURRENT DEVELOPMENT PRAXIS

1. Strategies meant to better rural areas usually have the opposite effects,

e.g. better education leads to rural out-migration in search of better

economic/job opportunities.

2. The effectiveness of current rural and urban development strategies (e.g.

ISRDP and URP) in addressing RUMP is doubtful and needs to be

addressed.

- The provision of social infrastructure is only a partial solution

- Sub-prime LED interventions, e.g. gardening projects, scratch the surface of economic aspirations of the rural poor

3. Rural areas lose the strong, “brightest and most promising” who are

relegated to informality in urban areas.

4. The poorest ruralites are the least likely to migrate = resource constraints.

5. The rural-urban continuum of poverty is poorly addressed by policy and in

development practice.

Page 11: Rural urban  migrant poverty (rump)  role of infrastructure in poverty eradication

UR

BA

N G

RO

WT

H

RU

RA

L G

RO

WT

H

Primary and Non-primary Employment

1 Processing/ Manufacturing

2 Demand for Inputs

3

Increased Household Incomes

4

Rising Demand for Health, Welfare and

Leisure Services

Growth of Centers for Consumer

Shopping

5

7

Growing Sales of Inputs/Producer

Services

Expanding Marketing of Regional

'Exports'

6

8

TOWNS/CITIESE

Favorable international commodity prices/ Localization and diversification of foreign investment

INTERNATIONAL ECONOMY

NATIONAL GOVERNMENTAdequate provision of infrasturcture and basic services/ Support of local economic initiatives and organization

RURAL REGION

C

A

B

INVESTMENT IN BASIC/LEADING

SECTORS

D

Economic Diversification/

Increasing Productivity

Renewal of Resource Base/ Environment/

Ecology

Broad-based Increases in Income and

Welfare

GF H

VIR

TU

OU

S C

YC

LE

OF

RE

GIO

NA

L D

EV

EL

OP

ME

NT

& R

UR

AL

-UR

BA

N L

INK

AG

ES

Page 12: Rural urban  migrant poverty (rump)  role of infrastructure in poverty eradication

RURAL REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROCESS: STRUCTURES, FLOWS AND POLICY INTERVENTIONS

RURAL-URBAN LINKAGES/FLOWS

POLICY INTERVENTIONS • Agrarian reform • Agriculture intensification/ diversification • Cooperatives • Enviromental programs • Irrigation, storage facilities and Other rural infrastructure

• Roads/transportation • Electricity • Communications • Seaports/airports

• market centers • commercial outlets • urban services • banking/credit • urban infrastructure • communications services

• Non-agricultural employment • Urban services • Production supplies • Non-durable and durable goods • Markets for selling rural products • Processing/ manufacturing • Information on employment, production, prices, welfare services

URBAN FUNCTIONS/

ROLES

RURAL STRUCTURE/

STRUCTURAL CHANGE

• Socio-economic Structure/ Relations • Rural Economy (Sectors) • Rural Production Regimes • Natural Environment & Resources • Infrastructure Built Environment

PRODUCTION • upstream linkages (inputs) • downstream linkages (processing, manufacturing)

PEOPLE • labor commuting/migration • other migration (e.g., education) • shopping/visiting/selling

CAPITAL/INCOME • value added • savings/credit • migrant remittances

COMMODITIES • inputs • consumer non-durables/durables • rural products

INFORMATION • production/sales/prices • welfare/social/political • employment

4

3

2

1

5

Page 13: Rural urban  migrant poverty (rump)  role of infrastructure in poverty eradication

FURTHER AREAS FOR CONSIDERATION

A number of key issues need further examination, viz:

1. Implications of rural-urban migration and counter-urbanisation on land and agrarian reform.

2. The Gender dimensions of RUMP.

3. Provision of robust social infrastructure to meet rural-urban migration and demographic changes.

4. Social and economic capital value and costs of rural-urban migration.

5. The implications/impact of globalisation on RUM

6. Where is Best/Good Practice in addressing RUMP – Can SA follow and adapt the development path of the North?

Page 14: Rural urban  migrant poverty (rump)  role of infrastructure in poverty eradication

Thank you …

Mthokozisi Sidambe

Email address: [email protected]

Acknowledgements:

For the sterling contributions and insight from James Chakwizira, with whom I originally did the research on the

presented work in 2008.

Email address: [email protected]