RtI & PBIS: Braiding Initiatives

George SugaiOSEP Center on PBIS

Center for Behavioral Education & Research

University of ConnecticutNovember 19, 2008

www.pbis.org www.cber.org www.swis.org

George.sugai@uconn.edu

PURPOSE

Provide some thoughts about

braiding initiatives by

establishing integrated

continuum of behavior support

that reflects RtI framework

• Context RtI & Braiding Initiatives• PBIS Basics• RtI-PBIS Applications & Examples

Braiding InitiativesWayne Gretzky Wisdom

“Most players skate to

where the puck is, but I

skate to where the

puck is going”

Key point #1

“Braiding Initiatives” Guiding Principles

Is Student Affected Directly

Continuous Regeneration

Key point #2

Responsiveness-to-Intervention

RtI: Good “IDEiA” PolicyApproach or framework for redesigning

& establishing teaching & learning environments that are effective,

efficient, relevant, & durable for all students, families & educators

• NOT program, curriculum, strategy, intervention

• NOT limited to special education

• NOT new

Key point #3

RtI

Response to Intervention

Quotable Fixsen

“Policy is allocation of limited resources for unlimited needs

– Opportunity, not guarantee, for good action”

“Training does not predict action”

– “Manualized treatments have created overly rigid & rapid applications”

Specialized Individual Interventions(Individual StudentSystem)

Continuum of Effective BehaviorSupport

Specialized GroupInterventions(At-Risk System)

Universal Interventions (School-Wide SystemClassroom System)

Studentswithout SeriousProblemBehaviors (80 -90%)

Students At-Risk for Problem Behavior(5-15%)

Students withChronic/IntenseProblem Behavior(1 - 7%)

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Tertiary Prevention

All Students in SchoolCirca 1994

1-5% 1-5%

5-10% 5-10%

80-90% 80-90%

Intensive, Individual Interventions•Individual Students•Assessment-based

•High Intensity

Intensive, Individual Interventions•Individual Students•Assessment-based

•Intense, durable procedures

Targeted Group Interventions•Some students (at-risk)

•High efficiency•Rapid response

Targeted Group Interventions•Some students (at-risk)

•High efficiency•Rapid response

Universal Interventions•All students

•Preventive, proactive

Universal Interventions•All settings, all students•Preventive, proactive

Designing School-Wide Systems for Student Success

Academic Systems Behavioral Systems

Circa 1996

Responsiveness to Intervention

Academic+

Social Behavior

Primary Prevention:School-/Classroom-Wide Systems for

All Students,Staff, & Settings

Secondary Prevention:Specialized Group

Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior

Tertiary Prevention:Specialized

IndividualizedSystems for Students

with High-Risk Behavior

~80% of Students

~15%

~5%

CONTINUUM OFSCHOOL-WIDE

INSTRUCTIONAL & POSITIVE BEHAVIOR

SUPPORT

ALL

SOME

FEW

Key point #4

All

Some

FewRTI

Continuum of Support for

ALL

Dec 7, 2007

School-wide Positive

Behavioral Supports

PBIS Logic!Successful individual student support is linked to host environments or school climates that are effective, efficient, relevant, integrated, durable, & scalable for all students(Zins & Ponti, 1990)

Key point #5

SYST

EMS

PRACTICES

DATASupportingStaff Behavior

SupportingStudent Behavior

OUTCOMES

Supporting Social Competence &Academic Achievement

SupportingDecisionMaking

IntegratedElements

SYST

EMS

PRACTICES

DATASupportingStaff Behavior

SupportingStudent Behavior

OUTCOMES

Supporting Social Competence &Academic Achievement

SupportingDecisionMaking

IntegratedElements

SWPBS outcomes

SYST

EMS

PRACTICES

DATASupportingStaff Behavior

SupportingStudent Behavior

OUTCOMES

Supporting Social Competence &Academic Achievement

SupportingDecisionMaking

IntegratedElements

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

94-95 95-96 96-97 97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06

To

tal O

DR

s

Academic Years

FRMS Total Office Discipline Referrals

SUSTAINED IMPACTPre

Post

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

Mea

n P

ropo

rtio

n of

S

tude

nts

Met SET (N = 23) Not Met SET (N =12)

Central Illinois Elem, Middle SchoolsTriangle Summary 03-04

6+ ODR

2-5 ODR

0-1 ODR

84% 58%

11%

22%

05%20%

SWPBS schools are more preventive

National ODR/ISS/OSS July 2008

K-6 6-9 9-12# Sch 1756 476 177# Std 781,546 311,725 161,182# ODR 423,647 414,716 235,279

ISS # Evnt 6 38 38avg/100 # Day 12 49 61OSS # Evnt 6 30 24avg/100 # Day 10 74 61  # Expl 0.03 0.29 0.39

24091,254,4531,073,642

100,000 schools ~ 45,000,000 ODRs

July 2, 2008

ODR rates vary by level

July 2, 2008

www.swis.org

SYST

EMS

PRACTICES

DATASupportingStaff Behavior

SupportingStudent Behavior

OUTCOMES

Supporting Social Competence &Academic Achievement

SupportingDecisionMaking

IntegratedElements

VIOLENCE PREVENTION

• Surgeon General’s Report on Youth Violence (2001)

• Coordinated Social Emotional & Learning (Greenberg et al., 2003)

• Center for Study & Prevention of Violence (2006)

• White House Conference on School Violence (2006)

• Positive, predictable school-wide climate

• High rates of academic & social success

• Formal social skills instruction

• Positive active supervision & reinforcement

• Positive adult role models

• Multi-component, multi-year school-family-community effort

Classroom

SWPBSPractices

Non-classroom Family

Student

School-w

ide

• Smallest #• Evidence-based

• Biggest, durable effect

Key point #6

1. Leadership team

2. Behavior purpose statement

3. Set of positive expectations & behaviors

4. Procedures for teaching SW & classroom-wide expected behavior

5. Continuum of procedures for encouraging expected behavior

6. Continuum of procedures for discouraging rule violations

7. Procedures for on-going data-based monitoring & evaluation

School-wide

Teaching Matrix

SETTING

All Settings

Hallways Playgrounds CafeteriaLibrary/

Computer Lab

Assembly Bus

Respect Ourselves

Be on task.Give your best effort.

Be prepared.

Walk. Have a plan.

Eat all your food.Select healthy foods.

Study, read,

compute.

Sit in one spot.

Watch for your stop.

Respect Others

Be kind.Hands/feet

to self.Help/share

with others.

Use normal voice

volume.Walk to

right.

Play safe.Include others.Share

equipment.

Practice good table manners

Whisper.Return books.

Listen/watch.Use

appropriate applause.

Use a quiet voice.

Stay in your seat.

Respect Property

Recycle.Clean up after self.

Pick up litter.

Maintain physical space.

Use equipment properly.

Put litter in garbage can.

Replace trays &

utensils.Clean up

eating area.

Push in chairs.Treat books

carefully.

Pick up.Treat chairs appropriately

.

Wipe your feet.Sit

appropriately.

Exp

ecta

tions 1. S

OCIAL SKILL2. NATURAL

CONTEXT

3. BEHAVIOR

EXAMPLES

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

94-95 95-96 96-97 97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06

To

tal O

DR

s

Academic Years

FRMS Total Office Discipline Referrals

SUSTAINED IMPACTPre

Post

Elementary School

Suspension Rate

Elementary School

Trends in Suspension Rates for PBS Schools Implementing w/ Fidelity & Maturity

Trends in Black & Hispanic Suspension Rates for PBS Schools Implementing w/ Fidelity & Maturity

• Positive expectations & routines taught & encouraged

• Active supervision by all staff– Scan, move, interact

• Precorrections & reminders

• Positive reinforcement

Non-classroom

Franzen, K., & Kamps, D. (2008).

“Good morning, class!”

Teachers report that when students are greeted by an adult in morning, it takes less time to complete morning routines & get first lesson started.

Active Supervision & Dismissal

McCormick Elementary School, MD

Name______________________________ Date_____________

Setting □ Hallway □ Entrance □ Cafeteria

□ Playground □ Other_______________Time Start_________

Time End _________

Tally each Positive Student Contacts Total #

Ratio of Positives to Negatives: _____: 1Tally each Negative Student Contacts Total #

Non-Classroom Management: Self-Assessment

1. Did I have at least 4 positive for 1 negative student contacts? Yes No

2. Did I move throughout the area I was supervising? Yes No

3. Did I frequently scan the area I was supervising? Yes No

4. Did I positively interact with most of the students in the area? Yes No

5. Did I handle most minor rule violations quickly and quietly? Yes No

6. Did I follow school procedures for handling major rule violations? Yes No

7. Do I know our school-wide expectations (positively stated rules)? Yes No

8. Did I positively acknowledge at least 5 different students for displaying our school-wide expectations?

Yes No

Overall active supervision score:

7-8 “yes” = “Super Supervision”

5-6 “yes” = “So-So Supervision”

<5 “yes” = “Improvement Needed”

# Yes______

• Classroom-wide positive expectations taught & encouraged

• Teaching classroom routines & cues taught & encouraged

• Ratio of 6-8 positive to 1 negative adult-student interaction

• Active supervision• Redirections for minor, infrequent behavior errors• Frequent precorrections for chronic errors• Effective academic instruction & curriculum

Classroom

Typical Contexts/ Routines

Classroom-Wide Rules/ExpectationsRespect Others Respect Property Respect Self

AllUse inside voice.

Raise hand to answer/talk.

Recycle paper.Put writing tools inside

desk.

Do your best.Ask.

Morning MeetingEyes on speaker.

Give brief answers.

Put announcements in desk.

Keep feet on floor.

Put check by my announcements.

HomeworkDo own work.

Turn in before lesson.

Put homework neatly in box.

Touch your work only.

Turn in lesson on time.Do homework

night/day before.

TransitionUse inside voice.

Keep hands to self.Put/get materials first.

Keep hands to self.Have plan.Go directly.

“I Need Assistance”

Raise hand or show “Assistance Card”.

Wait 2 minutes & try again.

Have materials ready.Have plan.

Ask if unclear.

Teacher DirectedEyes on speaker.

Keep hands to self.Use materials as

intended.Have plan.

Ask.

Independent WorkUse inside voice.

Keep hands to self.

Use materials as intended.

Return with done.

Use time as planned.Ask.

Problem to SolveStop, Step Back,

Think, ActStop, Step Back,

Think, ActStop, Step Back,

Think, Act

1. SOCIAL SKILL2. N

ATURAL

CONTEXT

3. BEHAVIOR

EXAMPLES

Allday & Pakurar (2007)

Teacher__________________________ Rater_______________________

Date___________

Instructional Activity Time Start_______

Time End________

Tally each Positive Student Contacts

Total # Tally each Negative Student Contacts

Total #

Ratio of Positives to Negatives: _____ to 1

Classroom Management: Self-Assessment

Classroom Management Practice Rating

1. I have arranged my classroom to minimize crowding and distraction Yes No

2. I have maximized structure and predictability in my classroom (e.g., explicit classroom routines, specific directions, etc.).

Yes No

3. I have posted, taught, reviewed, and reinforced 3-5 positively stated expectations (or rules).

Yes No

4. I provided more frequent acknowledgement for appropriate behaviors than inappropriate behaviors (See top of page).

Yes No

5. I provided each student with multiple opportunities to respond and participate during instruction.

Yes No

6. My instruction actively engaged students in observable ways (e.g., writing, verbalizing) Yes No

7. I actively supervised my classroom (e.g., moving, scanning) during instruction. Yes No

8. I ignored or provided quick, direct, explicit reprimands/redirections in response to inappropriate behavior.

Yes No

9. I have multiple strategies/systems in place to acknowledge appropriate behavior (e.g., class point systems, praise, etc.).

Yes No

10. In general, I have provided specific feedback in response to social and academic behavior errors and correct responses.

Yes No

Overall classroom management score:

10-8 “yes” = “Super” 7-5 “yes” = “So-So” <5 “yes” = “Improvement Needed”# Yes___

• Behavioral competence at school & district levels

• Function-based behavior support planning

• Team- & data-based decision making

• Comprehensive person-centered planning & wraparound processes

• Targeted social skills & self-management instruction

• Individualized instructional & curricular accommodations

Individual Student

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100 BL CI/CO

CI/CO +75%

CI/CO +80%

CI/CO +90%

Helena

School Days

Per

cen

t of

Int

erva

ls E

nga

ged

in P

robl

em

B

ehav

ior

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Jade

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Farrell

Began meds.

Class B Results

GOALS 8:30 9:30 10:30 11:30 12:30 1:30

1. RESPECT OTHERS 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0

2. MANAGE SELF 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0

3. SOLVE PROBLEMS RESPONSIBLY

2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0

Name________________ Date ________

Rating Scale2 = Great1 = Ok0 = Goal Not Met

Goal _____Pts Possible _____Pts Received_____% of Pts _____Goal Met? Y N

Check In/Out Pt Card

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100 BL CI/CO

CI/CO +75%

CI/CO +80%

CI/CO +90%

Helena

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Jade

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Farrell

Began meds.

School Days

Per

cen

t of

Int

erva

ls E

nga

ged

in P

robl

em

Beh

avi

or

Class B Results + Composite Peers

Peer

Peer

Peer

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Ben

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Marcellus

BL CI/CO

CI/CO75%

CI/CO80%

FB plan

FB plan 2

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Blair

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Olivia

Per

cen

t of

Int

erva

ls E

nga

ged

in P

robl

em

Beh

avi

or

Study 2 Results

School Days

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Olivia

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Marcellus

BL CI/CO

CI/CO75%

CI/CO80%

FB plan

FB plan 2

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Ben

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Blair

School Days

Per

cen

t of

Int

erva

ls E

nga

ged

in P

robl

em

Beh

avi

or

Peer

Peer

Peer

Peer

Study 2 Results + Composite Peer

• Continuum of positive behavior support for all families

• Frequent, regular positive contacts, communications, & acknowledgements

• Formal & active participation & involvement as equal partner

• Access to system of integrated school & community resources

Family

Family Teaching

Matrix

SETTING

At homeMorning Routine

HomeworkMeal

TimesIn Car Play Bedtime

Respect Ourselves

Respect Others

Respect Property

Exp

ecta

tions 1. S

OCIAL SKILL

2. NATURAL

CONTEXT

3. BEHAVIOR

EXAMPLES

www.pbis.orgHorner, R., & Sugai, G. (2008). Is school-wide positive behavior support an evidence-based practice? OSEP Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Support.

http://www.pbis.org/files/101007evidencebase4pbs.pdf.

SYST

EMS

PRACTICES

DATASupportingStaff Behavior

SupportingStudent Behavior

OUTCOMES

Supporting Social Competence &Academic Achievement

SupportingDecisionMaking

IntegratedElements

Agreements

Team

Data-based Action Plan

ImplementationEvaluation

GENERAL IMPLEMENTATION

PROCESS: “Getting Started”

Initiative, Project,

Committee

Purpose Outcome Target Group

Staff Involved

SIP/SID/etc

Attendance Committee

Character Education

Safety Committee

School Spirit Committee

Discipline Committee

DARE Committee

EBS Work Group

Working Smarter

Initiative, Committee

Purpose Outcome Target Group

Staff Involved

SIP/SID

Attendance Committee

Increase attendance

Increase % of students attending daily

All students Eric, Ellen, Marlee

Goal #2

Character Education

Improve character

Improve character All students Marlee, J.S., Ellen

Goal #3

Safety Committee

Improve safety Predictable response to threat/crisis

Dangerous students

Has not met Goal #3

School Spirit Committee

Enhance school spirit

Improve morale All students Has not met

Discipline Committee

Improve behavior

Decrease office referrals

Bullies, antisocial students, repeat offenders

Ellen, Eric, Marlee, Otis

Goal #3

DARE Committee

Prevent drug use High/at-risk drug users

Don

EBS Work Group Implement 3-tier model

Decrease office referrals, increase attendance, enhance academic engagement, improve grades

All students Eric, Ellen, Marlee, Otis, Emma

Goal #2

Goal #3

Sample Teaming Matrix

Are outcomes

measurable?Key point #8

~80% of Students

~15%

~5%

ESTABLISHING CONTINUUM of SWPBS

SECONDARY PREVENTION• Check in/out

• Targeted social skills instruction• Peer-based supports

• Social skills club•

TERTIARY PREVENTION• Function-based support

• Wraparound• Person-centered planning

• •

PRIMARY PREVENTION• Teach SW expectations• Proactive SW discipline• Positive reinforcement

• Effective instruction• Parent engagement

•

SECONDARY PREVENTION• • • • •

TERTIARY PREVENTION• • • • •

PRIMARY PREVENTION• • • • • •

~80% of Students

~15%

~5%

ESTABLISHING A CONTINUUM of SWPBS

SECONDARY PREVENTION• Check in/out• Targeted social skills instruction• Peer-based supports• Social skills club•

TERTIARY PREVENTION• Function-based support• Wraparound/PCP• Specialized individualised supports•

PRIMARY PREVENTION• Teach & encourage positive SW expectations• Proactive SW discipline• Effective instruction• Parent engagement•

Audit

1.Identify existing practices by tier

2.Specify outcome for each effort

3.Evaluate implementation accuracy & outcome effectiveness

4.Eliminate/integrate based on outcomes

5.Establish decision rules (RtI)

Practice Selection

•Evidence-based

•Measurable outcome aligned with need & student

•Rules for data-based decisions

•Integrated with related practices based on outcomes, need, student

•Implementation fidelity

•Continuous monitoring

PBS Implementation Blueprint www.pbis.org

Funding Visibility PoliticalSupport

Training Coaching Evaluation

Local School Teams/Demonstrations

PBS Systems Implementation Logic

Leadership TeamActive & Integrated Coordination

ValuedOutcomes

ContinuousSelf-Assessment

Practice Implementation

EffectivePractices

Relevance

Priority Efficacy

Fidelity

BRAIDING INITIATIVES:

SUSTAINABLE IMPLEMENTATION & DURABLE RESULTS

George.sugai@uconn.edu

Robh@uoregon.edu

www.pbis.org