roma 17 maggio 2005tilecal 1 tilecal status report stato dell’esperimento responsabilita’ di...
TRANSCRIPT
Roma 17 Maggio 2005 TileCal 1
Tilecal Status report
Stato dell’esperimento
Responsabilita’ di Pisa
Attivita’ in corso: commissioning, calibrazioni, analisi difisica
Richieste
Roma 17 Maggio 2005 TileCal 2
Commissioning is being done by all Institutes: F/E electronics, bus, HV, LV etc. Move to z=0 +final alignment based on survey data for tiles+LAR ~25 Aug. 05.
Barrel installation completed on 10/12/2005
10 Dec 2004
Roma 17 Maggio 2005 TileCal 3
F/E electronics tests with Mobidick
September 2004
Concerns last certification tests of the individual FE Drawers,before Commissioning (using the local portable Test Bench MobiDICK).All elements are tested, including cooling circuitry + fibers (with pulse LED)
All drawers installed in the Barrel, few channels still to be fixed. Still on the critical side: LV.
Roma 17 Maggio 2005 TileCal 4
Use MOBIDAQ:-on truck + temporary cables-At Z=0 with final cables
MOBIDAQ in USA15
TTC & GLINK fibers
CANbus patch panelMobiDAQ
Row 16 Row 19
12
3
F/E electronics tests with MobiDAQ
USA15
Tests of the complete system on 8 modules at time: SD, buses, CIS, Laser, HV, LV... Use of the online Monitor for immediate diagnostic and offline analysis
MobiDAQ is also used for preliminary Cosmic Runs.
Roma 17 Maggio 2005 TileCal 5
Fingers and drawers
Roma 17 Maggio 2005 TileCal 6
Fix a drawer
Roma 17 Maggio 2005 TileCal 7
Trigger boards QDC for the trigger
CCT with S-links for the digital readout
TTC modulesMobiDAQ
Roma 17 Maggio 2005 TileCal 8
MobyDAQ: sample of results
Pedestal rms (noise)
CIS scan (gain)
Roma 17 Maggio 2005 TileCal 9
Cosmic Ray Tests (preliminary now at 185)
Tile Barrel lower modules
Special 9U VME, FPGA programmable6 Super Drawer/unit
Use MobiDAQ and temporary trigger logic, Online Monitoring + Offline analysis
Roma 17 Maggio 2005 TileCal 10
AT
LA
NT
IS
Geo
Mod
el
Allows: -Check for dead-channels -HV-Cesium equalization- Compare with Tbeam data
Cosmics: first results
Rates in UX15: 130 /h (TileCal)
Roma 17 Maggio 2005 TileCal 11
Cosmics Runs, Energy (pC) for the B-Cells(Check dead channels)
Roma 17 Maggio 2005 TileCal 12
Main steps for barrel:
•until end Aug: Installation and commissioning WPs standalone in USA15/UX15
•7-29 September: cables/fibers/pipes installation to the fingers rotating in sectors every 2 days (8 fingers/day) with several teams (TC contractor, Protvino, CF, LIP, tile techs pool+…..
•9 Sept->16 November : install LV, commission 8 fingers at the time rotating in sectors every 6 days (2.7 fingers/day) with MOBIDAQ,ROD DAQ (if available) and MOBIDICK when needed.
•16 Nov-7 Dec: commission the 2 barrel partitions (~5000 channels) with ROD DAQ
•The EBC and EBA will follow during end 2005, first half of 2006
Overall commissioning scenario
Roma 17 Maggio 2005 TileCal 13
Organization
We have started a reorganization of TileCal defining things to be done (Work Packages) and responsabilities, hopefully to improve on the efficiency.This process has now converged.
In this scheme Pisa is well represented at all levels.
Roma 17 Maggio 2005 TileCal 14
TileCal Organization (1)
Roma 17 Maggio 2005 TileCal 15
TileCal Organization (2)
Roma 17 Maggio 2005 TileCal 16
TileCal Organization (3)
Roma 17 Maggio 2005 TileCal 17
TileCal Organization (4)
Roma 17 Maggio 2005 TileCal 18
Activities in Pisa
•Laboratory tests (PMT)•Simulation•Analysis
Roma 17 Maggio 2005 TileCal 19
Tests in Pisa: PMT long run tests (G. Usai)
Test of stability of PMT operating in LHC environement for 1-2 years at full luminosity.
Roma 17 Maggio 2005 TileCal 20
Sample of results being obtained
Stability (Am)
GainI-dark
Quantum eff.
We are still debugging. Most of the problem solved.• Am source is “old” • Poor room temp. conditioning• Some channels look “weird”
One measurement lasts 12 h light is setting: Qpmt = 50 CIncrease light to MB at LHC
Time
Roma 17 Maggio 2005 TileCal 21
Other ongoing activities:•On Line Monitor (Chiara, Andrea, Paolo); Chiara Roda coordinates the effort of a group of physicists from various subdetectors. The work started as an OnLine monitor for TileCal TB, evolved as “GNAM” at the CTB and now looks as a promising approach to a “low level” monitor for many sub detectors for ATLAS. GNAM is now a package of the standard TDAQ software. Chiara participates to the monitor working group of ATLAS.•monitor snapshot•TileMuId (G. Usai); the work continues in collaboration with muon community. The method of tagging muons with TileCal is a standard and well debugged tool in Athena and HLT and is evolving as a method for
•Isolation of muons in the calorimeters•Recovery of muons large energy losses
•Comparison G4/CTB (Andrea, Anna) has made large progresses and should be near to the end.•“Real Detector Simulation” in G4 (Anna)
Roma 17 Maggio 2005 TileCal 22
Comparison CombinedTB - Geant4 (A. Dotti)
pions in LArg+Tile
• Pions at= 0.35, Ebeam =20 - 350 GeV
• Data calibrated at e.m. scale• Tested some methods of energy reconstruction in LArg • Fixed few little bugs (now in Athena version 10.0.2)• Now agreement in energy reconstruction is within 5%
(Ebeam = 20 - 350 GeV).
• Works on shower shape still going on.
Roma 17 Maggio 2005 TileCal 23
Energy distribution Ebeam = 180 GeV
180 GeV =0.35
LArg
TileCal
LArg + TileCal
E (MeV)
E (MeV)
E (MeV)
Ent
ries
(A
.U.)
Ent
ries
(A
.U.)
Ent
ries
(A
.U.)
Roma 17 Maggio 2005 TileCal 24
Mean reconstructed energy
G4 DATA
Rec
o E
(G
eV)
Eda
ta /
EG
4
±5%
E Beam (GeV)
E Beam (GeV)
Roma 17 Maggio 2005 TileCal 25
20 Gev 50 Gev
100 Gev 200 Gev
We can do better! Using weighting techniques on CTB data (Chiara, Iacopo, Andrea)
i
iiii E
baEw )(
The energy of cell i is weighted:
a, b are obtained by minimizing:
e beam
beamii
E
EEw2
Linearity Resolution
RawCorrected
Roma 17 Maggio 2005 TileCal 26
This activity comes along with the Jet Energy reconstruction/calibration (Chiara, Iacopo).
Calibration of DC1 dijet (QCD) sample has been done, in progress the work on the “Rome-layout” production.
Few methods of jets reconstruction (cone, kt, topojet) and then recalibration.
Results of our method: linearity +-2% (0.02-4 TeV) resolution improves by 15%
The package is now a standard method in Athena.
Roma 17 Maggio 2005 TileCal 27
Physics analysis.Two analyis to check the possible use of a LVL2 “b-tagger” (FASTRACK a la CDF or battery of CPUs).
•pp->j+Z+X with Z->bb (b-tagged jets); if possible to trigger on this channel it would be the ideal way of calibrating the b-jets.
•pp->bb+A/H with A/H->bb (3/4 b-tagged Jets); this is a standard discovery channel of the supersymmetric Higgs.
In both studies the b is assumed to decay hadronically and be identified by impact parameter.
The advantage is the BR, the disadvantage is the tag efficiency, mistags.
•pp->Hqq +X with H->
Roma 17 Maggio 2005 TileCal 28
Signal QCD
LVL1 RateKHz
- 4.9
LVL2 RateHz
- 98-10
Kin. Sel+2bfb
1098 195000
80<Mbb<100
fb
551 21100
Jet+Z->bb (V. Cavasinni and I. Vivarelli)
S/B S/√B30 fb-1
2.5% 20.6
Needs to lower the jet thresholds to have sidebands for bknd subtraction, hence reduce the rates at LVL2 by fast tagging b-quarks.
Roma 17 Maggio 2005 TileCal 29
pp-> bb+A/H->4b (3/4 tagged) (V. Cavasinni and I. Vivarelli)
Selection εS εB S(30 fb-1)
B(30 fb-1)
S/B S/√B
Official ATLAS HLT menu
0.11% 1.6 10-9 140 4630 3.0% 2.0
Improved multijet trigger
1.1% 1.3 10-8 1380 36850 3.7% 7.2
The proposed trigger allows to have a factor 10 more statistics.
To avoid too large QCD rate it needs fast b-tagging.
It is a counting experiment where the new scheme of triggering can improve the significance over the standard trigger menu.
Roma 17 Maggio 2005 TileCal 30
ATLAS light HIGGS discovery potential at 30 fb-1
• Vector boson fusion qqHat least one decaying leptonically) fundamental at masses 120-140 GeV.
Roma 17 Maggio 2005 TileCal 31
HVBF hhF.Sarri, V. Cavasinni, I.Vivarelli)
In this channel we have an additional huge background from QCD:
fbhhBRHBRVBFsig 125)()(
11103.1 QCD
sig
Fundamental the algorithm to identify ’s/reject QCD jetsUse the results of the Milan,Freiburg groups: D. Cavalli, M. Heldmann
Roma 17 Maggio 2005 TileCal 32
“Hard” cuts
HVBF hh signal vs QCD backgroundpreliminary
Roma 17 Maggio 2005 TileCal 33
“Soft” cuts
HVBF hh signal vs QCD backgroundpreliminary
Roma 17 Maggio 2005 TileCal 34
Richieste
• Un nuovo dottorando: Paolo Adragna
• Richieste MI: 5 KE per riunioni ATLAS-It, riunioni per Monitor, Roma Wshp etc.
• Avuto 8KE speso ad Aprile 3KE.
• Richieste ME: 12 mu.
•Avuto 90KE speso ad Aprile 37KE ma:
• 7mu (30KE) di installazione (tecnici), promessi alla collaborazione saranno utilizzati a Settembre. Ci rimane per metabolismo 20KE.
• Ci viene richiesto di mantenere un fisico sempre al CERN per il commissioning. Vivarelli e’ al CERN con resonsabilita’ di test finali del Barrel (MobiDAQ). Al commissioning dovremo partecipare anche con altri fisici.
Roma 17 Maggio 2005 TileCal 35
Test procedure with MobiDAQStep Task Description for commissioning in sectors (8 SD at the time) Duration
0 Connecting cables (With temporary cables & local LVPS takes several hours…) 30 min
1 Running diagnostic package in DVS
• Tests using CANbus done successively for each SD
• Other tests can run in parallel for 8 SD
• Errors displayed automatically and stored in logbook.
• In case of errors check : LV, disconnected cables, etc...
• If no success, use Mobidick near finger for repair and retest.
• Meanwhile bypass daisy chain+ go to Step 2 for other SDs.
30 min
2 long term stability runs “a la test beam”
• 3 independent runs for: pedestal, CIS, laser
• On-line Monitoring provide summary histograms
• More detailed histograms available if problems detected
• Histograms saved locally (which database?)
• Runs can be analyzed offline using Athena
Several hours (if needed)
FE electronics tests with MobiDAQ
Roma 17 Maggio 2005 TileCal 36
Back
Energy in a cone around a tagged muon (G. Usai)
Cone radius
Roma 17 Maggio 2005 TileCal 37
1) Mean value for CIS signal as PMT function2) Distribution (48 PMTs) of mean value for CIS signal3) Distribution (48 PMTs) of rms for CIS signal4) Signal Timing as PMT function (no corrections applied)
1
2
3
4
BackBack
Roma 17 Maggio 2005 TileCal 38
Tile Muon Trigger Set-Up (june 2005)
• The tile muon trigger will take advantage of the output of the trigger towers (used later for LVL1, sum of the signals of all cells in one tower).
• One trigger tower covers ∆ηx∆φ=0.1x0.1, readout for the tile muon trigger via Chicago coincidence boards (see later) up to η<0.8.
– For 0.8<η<1.0 there are still some cells in the first samplings. They could be included into the trigger by changing a patch panel (now the Chicago trigger boards read only 8 towers in 1 mod.)
• Each trigger tower will provide a signal. Coincidence with back to back tower. NIM signal. • 4 boards will be produced to read out 24 modules (12 on the top and 12 on the bottom)
Expected rate:130/hTest equalization, timing,...