role of librarians in digital scholarship
TRANSCRIPT
TITLE OF PRESENTATION |
Presented By
Date
Role of Librarians in Digital Scholarship
Pio Omana
2015 March
TITLE OF PRESENTATION |
Going Digital with ElsevierWhere can ELSEVIER help?
What is Digital Scholarship today?Defining what it is
Summary
How important are you?Help define the standards of digital scholarship
TITLE OF PRESENTATION |
What is Digital Scholarship ?
TITLE OF PRESENTATION |
is the use of digital evidence, methods of inquiry, research, publication and preservation to achieve scholarly and research goals.
Digital scholarship can encompass both scholarly communication using digital media and research on digital media.
An important aspect of digital scholarship is the effort to establish digital media and social media as credible, professional and legitimate means of research and communication.
TITLE OF PRESENTATION |
What are the general drivers for this movement?
• Knowledge synthesis • Publishing in electronic-only journals
(hyperlinked) • Desire for feedback on work• Need to connect/interact/collaborate with other
scholars• D.S. is less expensive and more flexible than
print publishing• Access • Ability to merge scholarship with teaching
TITLE OF PRESENTATION |
Current constraint / inhibitors?
• Digital can’t replace the human interactive experience• Lack of institutional recognition• Intellectual property concerns• Lack of trust in the future of technologies• Preservation/standards rollover/digital migration• Credibility and authenticity• Lack of literacy regarding digital information• Time • Technical knowledge• Worries about security
TITLE OF PRESENTATION |
Why digital scholarship?
TITLE OF PRESENTATION |
“I think that the digital media are interesting enough in their own right to be worth originating something in. Because, really, the moment you have any idea, the
second thought that enters your mind after the original idea is, "What is this? Is it a book, is it a
movie, is it a this, is it a that, is it a short story, is it a breakfast cereal?" Really, from that moment, your
decision about what kind of thing it is then determines how it develops. So something will be very, very different if it's developed as a CD-ROM
than if it's developed as a book. - Douglas Adams, Interview with The Onion A.V. Club
(1998)
TITLE OF PRESENTATION |
why digital scholarship?
○ - Bringing computing power to old humanities questions -
Working “with machines in ways and on scales that our
brains cannot” - Michelle Moravec
○ - Bringing different fields together
○ - Bringing students into research & original work
○ - Making scholarship broadly accessible
○ - Exploring relationships between culture and technology
○ - COLLABORATION
TITLE OF PRESENTATION || 10
Researchers are looking for a tool that will…
Help me to discover the relevant information
Keep me informed of the latest developments and news
Give me access to the detail
Make the process quick and easy
Source: Qualitative survey results “value of ScienceDirect A&G Researchers” June 2014
TITLE OF PRESENTATION || 11
Some types of DIGITAL Scholarship
TITLE OF PRESENTATION |
How important are YOU?
TITLE OF PRESENTATION |
Some questions you need to consider..
• What is driving Digital Scholarship? Is there a question of purpose or definitions?
• What are the current constraints and inhibitors? Time, money, tenure considerations?
• What are the success factors?• What has enabled you to engage in digital
scholarship?• What works? What kind of academic
support have you found useful?
TITLE OF PRESENTATION |
process | productdigital pedagogy & digital projects
TITLE OF PRESENTATION |
pedagogy (process)goal: exposes students to
the potential for technology to enhance or alter learning & research; includes reflection on the impact of the tech on learning
digital scholarship is either process or product or both
research project (product)goal: provides a long term
digital scholarly resource that takes advantage of the networked aspects of the Internet to further knowledge generation
TITLE OF PRESENTATION |
planning for a digital scholarship project
3.managing the project
4.sustaining the project
2.identifying the team
1.defining the goals
TITLE OF PRESENTATION |
define goals using design-thinking methodology
○ - interview potential end users● scholars, dh community, students, general public, etc.
○ - who is your audience for the project?
○ - how will it be used?
○ - how is it unique from other scholarly projects?
○ - how can others (scholars or general public)
participate/contribute?
○ - Pro activeness of Libraries
TITLE OF PRESENTATION |
digital scholarship projects: collaboration is key...
Faculty/ScholarsLibrary/IT Students
TITLE OF PRESENTATION |
developing a digital scholarship project is a networked process
library/IT○ copyright○ Metadata○ preservation○ project
management○ user experience
(UX) design○ tool identification○ upgrades○ training/support
faculty/scholars○ subject matter
expertise○ project goals○ shared authorship
students○ technical assistance○ research assistance○ prototype build/test
TITLE OF PRESENTATION |
Managing your digital scholarship project
○ - roles, responsibilities○ - timelines and dependencies○ - prototyping○ - testing/feedback/iteration
TITLE OF PRESENTATION |
Project Thinking
TITLE OF PRESENTATION |
Sustaining your digital scholarship project
○ - plan for regular upgrades and updates to your project (2-3 year life cycle)
○ - collaborate with IT on long term space, tool and support needs
○ - collaborate with library on preservation strategy & inclusion in institutional repository
○ - Keen consideration of your partners witihin the project
TITLE OF PRESENTATION |
Going digital with Elsevier!
TITLE OF PRESENTATION |
TITLE OF PRESENTATION |
TITLE OF PRESENTATION |
TITLE OF PRESENTATION |
3.93
3.43
2.92
2.86
2.70
2.52
2.51
Available on my mobile device
No digital rights management
Integrated with other online sources such…
Available to my students for free
Available when library is closed
Easier to find
Easier to searchAnswered question 1846
1750
1674
1766
1786
1765
1818
1790
Data Source: 2012 Elsevier global market research study; responses from 2815 teachers.
“…online books help in finding teaching material easily from contents; saves time, and provides all relevant topics in one place.” Hussein Abdalla Hussein, University of Bahri/ Khartoum/Sudan
Teachers Rank the Benefits of eBooks (over printed books) in the library
TITLE OF PRESENTATION |
28
E-books cost less than print books to maintain
Cost Element Print Electronic
Space High Much less
Cleaning Low Much less
Maintenance Medium Much less
Electricity/climate control Low Somewhat less
Staffing Low Somewhat less
Circulation/Access Low Much less
Source: Paul N. Courant and Matthew “Buzzy” Nielsen , On The Cost of Keeping A Book, The Idea of Order: Transforming Research Collections for 21st Century Scholarship, June 2010
TITLE OF PRESENTATION |
E-book cost per use is superior to Print
29
Amount Spent
TotalUses
Cost Per Use
2007 $185,991
2008 $224,047 151,089 $1.48
2009 $204,678 251,273 $0.81
2010 $383,167 563,871 $0.68
2011 $732,725 709,944 $1.05
E‐books vs. Print books
$18 lowest cost per use for Print books
compared to
$1 average cost per use for e‐books
$18 lowest cost per use for Print books
compared to
$1 average cost per use for e‐books
Source: The Value of E-books to Academic Libraries, A Study of the E-books Catalogue at the University of Illinois, Urbana Champaign, LIBVALUE, May 2011
Source: CARLI, 2008, A Domestic Monograph Collection Assessment in Illinois Academic Libraries: What are we buying and how is it used?
TITLE OF PRESENTATION |
Source: IDC report “Extracting Value from Chaos” 6/11
TITLE OF PRESENTATION |
TITLE OF PRESENTATION |
Choosing your partners..
○ - Information on demand○ - competencies inclined with needs○ - Support in advocacy○ - Provides data and information for
baseline needs
TITLE OF PRESENTATION |
Libraries in the Philippines..
Average Spending of E‐P
Institutions have Electronic Materials
Have infrastructure to gain electronic
content
TITLE OF PRESENTATION |
Promote research dissemination
Generate knowledge across priority sectors
Enhance research productivity
Support for Higher Education Reform
Improve research capability
National Higher Education Research Agenda 2; andRoadmap – Public Higher Education Reform
1. Knowledge and technologies to advance national development and competitiveness2. Develop globally competitive universities by investing in R&D and extension, and modern facilities
Publicly‐funded HEIs as main instruments to meet needs of industry, public service and civil society
Philippine Development Plan (2011‐2016)
“In pursuit of inclusive growth”
TITLE OF PRESENTATION |
Philippines vs South-east Asia Research Output – Malaysia’s spectacular growth
Singapore
12%
22%
15%
16%
13%
8%
TITLE OF PRESENTATION |
Steadily Improving Value despite slowing output…
Get cited Read
Publish Cite
Disseminate
Get cited share
Cite Trend
Investigate
Publication share
CertifyCertifyCertify
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Elsevier
CHED‐10
0100200300400500600700
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Elsevier
CHED‐10
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Elsevier
CHED 10
Case in point: Philippines – CHED 10Source: Scopus data 2009‐13Coverage: Approximately 5,000 publishers
TITLE OF PRESENTATION |
CHED 10 Contributing to National Research Growth
Source: Scopus
CHED 10 CHED 10
CHED 10 CHED 10
CHED 10
CHED 10CHED 10 CHED 10
Others
OthersOthers Others
‐
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
Yr 2010 Yr 2011 Yr 2012 Yr 2013
Philippines: Total Research Publications
CHED 10 Others
TITLE OF PRESENTATION |
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
‐
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
1,200,000
1,400,000
1,600,000
1,800,000
Yr 2010 Yr 2011 Yr 2012 Yr 2013
Citations
CHED 10 ScienceDirect Usage vs Citations
SD usage Citations
TITLE OF PRESENTATION |
‐
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
‐
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
1,200,000
1,400,000
1,600,000
1,800,000
Yr 2010 Yr 2011 Yr 2012 Yr 2013
Research Output
CHED 10 ScienceDirect Usage vs Research Output
SD usage Research output
TITLE OF PRESENTATION |
Universities: University of the Philippines, University of Sto. Tomas, De La Salle University, Ateneo de Manila University, and Mapua Institute of Technology
Jan‐AugJan‐Aug
Jan‐Aug
Jan‐Aug
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
0
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
1,200,000
1,400,000
1,600,000
Yr 2010 Yr 2011 Yr 2012 Yr 2013
Research Output
Research Output vs SD Usage for Leading Universities
SD usage Research output
TITLE OF PRESENTATION |
Universities: University of San Carlos, Silliman University, Central Luzon State University, Visayas State University, and Mindanao State University
Jan‐Aug
Jan‐Aug
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Yr 2010 Yr 2011 Yr 2012 Yr 2013
Research Output of Lower‐Tier Universities
TITLE OF PRESENTATION |
Source: Scopus
CHED 10 CHED 10
CHED 10 CHED 10
‐
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
Yr 2010 Yr 2011 Yr 2012 Yr 2013
Citations for CHED 10 Universities
Lower‐tier Universities Upper‐tier Universities
TITLE OF PRESENTATION |
CHED 10
CHED 10CHED 10 CHED 10
Others
Others Others Others
‐
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
Yr 2010 Yr 2011 Yr 2012 Yr 2013
Philippines: Total Research Publications
CHED 10 Others
Opportunity to Accelerate National Research Growth by Improving Capacity of Lower-Tier Universities
Source: Scopus
TITLE OF PRESENTATION |
TITLE OF PRESENTATION |
SUMMARY
Key takeaways :
1. Promote COLLABORATION - not just within the institution but think outside of the box.
2. Make a SHORT term and LONG term digitalization plan
3. YOU are very important, be capable and decide on the things you need
4. ACT together, same vision one GOAL5. BUDGET gap will always have a story to tell6. Take the INITIATIVE 7. INNOVATION opens up new possibilities
TITLE OF PRESENTATION |
Make information and research SEXY! – Dr. Nap Juanillo, CHED
TITLE OF PRESENTATION |
THANK [email protected]