role of entrepreneurship in economic developmentirjcjournals.org/ijmssr/jan2017/4.pdf · role of...
TRANSCRIPT
International Journal of Management and Social Sciences Research (IJMSSR) ISSN: 2319-4421 Volume 6, No. 1, January 2017
Impact Factor: 4.954 www.irjcjournals.org
16
Role of Entrepreneurship in Economic Development
Dr. B. Sasikumar, Assistant Professor of Department of Economics, Arumugam Pillai Seethai
Ammal College, Thiruppattur, Sivagangai District, Tamilnadu, India
ABSTRACT
The word Entrepreneur is derived from the French word
‘Entreprendre’ meaning to undertake. Richard Cantillon,
an Irish man living in France, was the first economist who
introduced the term ‘entrepreneur’ referring to the risk-
taking function of establishing a new venture. Generally
speaking, entrepreneur refers to a person who establishes
his own business or industrial undertaking with a view to
making profit. Adam smith the foremost classical
economist assigned no significance to entrepreneurial role
in economic development in his monumental work’ An
Enquiry into the Nature and Cause of the Wealth of
Nations’ published in 1776. Smith extolled the rate of
capital formation as an important determinant of
economic development. The economic history of the
presently developed countries, for example, America,
Russia and Japan tends to support the fact that the
economy is an effect for which entrepreneurship is the
cause. The crucial role played by the entrepreneurs in the
development of the western countries has made the people
of underdeveloped countries too much conscious of the
significance of entrepreneurship for economic
development.
The role of entrepreneurship in economic development
varies from economy to economy depending upon its
material resources, industrial climate and the
responsiveness of the political system to the
entrepreneurial function. Every country is very keen in
promoting its economic development. Economic
development implies development of agriculture and
industry resulting in an increase in the per capita income
of the country. It is clear that economic development
cannot occur spontaneously. The economic development
largely depends on human resources. The entrepreneur
really acts as a hero in the drama of economic
development. The crucial role being played by
entrepreneur in the economic development of a country
can be studied under the following heads. Coordinating
role, Agents role, Role of innovation, Risk assumption
role, imitating role, Capital formation role, Balance role,
status transformation role, Employment generation role
and Export promotion role etc. Thus it is clear that
entrepreneurship in economic development of a country
can best be put as an economy is the effect, for which
entrepreneurship is the cause.
Keywords Role of entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurship in economic
development
INTRODUCTION
The word Entrepreneur is derived from the French word
Entreprendre meaning to undertake. In fact, in the 16th
century, the Frenchmen who undertook military
expeditions were referred to as Entrepreneurs. Later on, in
the 18th
century, this term got associated with persons who
started their own enterprises. Richard Cantillon, an Irish
man living in France, was the first economist who
introduced the term „entrepreneur‟ referring to the risk-
taking function of establishing a new venture.
Generally speaking, entrepreneur refers to a person who
establishes his own business or industrial undertaking with
a view to making profit. An entrepreneur is considered to
be an originator of a business venture. He takes the role of
an organizer in the process of production. The word
development is used in so many ways that it‟s precise
connotation often baffling. Nevertheless, economic
development essentially means a process over a long
period of time. Then, a simple but meaningful question
arises: what causes economic development? This question
has absorbed the attention of scholars of socio-economic
change for decades. In this section, we shall attempt to
shed light on an important aspect of that larger question,
i.e. the phenomenon of entrepreneurship. The one major
issue we shall address here is: what is the significance of
entrepreneurship for economic development? Does it add
an important independent influence to that of other factors
widely agreed to promote economic development of a
country like India.
Adam smith the foremost classical economist assigned no
significance to entrepreneurial role in economic
development in his monumental work‟ An Enquiry into the
Nature and Cause of the Wealth of Nations’ published in
1776. Smith extolled the rate of capital formation as an
important determinant of economic development. The
problem of economic development was ergo largely the
ability of the people to save more and invest more in any
country. According to him, ability to save is governed by
improvement in productivity to the increase in the
dexterity of every worker due to division of labor. Smith
regarded every person as the judge of his own advantage.
International Journal of Management and Social Sciences Research (IJMSSR) ISSN: 2319-4421 Volume 6, No. 1, January 2017
Impact Factor: 4.954 www.irjcjournals.org
17
According to him, each individual is led by an „Invisible
hand‟ in pursuing his/her interest. He always advocates the
policy of laissez-faire in economic affairs.
In his theory of economic development, David Ricardo
identified only three factors of production, namely,
machinery, capital and labor, among whom the entire
produce is distributed as rent, profit and wages
respectively. Ricardo appreciated the virtues of profit in
capital accumulation. According to him, profit leads to
saving of wealth which ultimately goes to capital
formation.
Thus, in both the classical theories of economic
development, there is no room for entrepreneurship. And,
economic development seems to be automatic and self-
regulated. Thus, the of classical economists was very cold
towards the role of entrepreneurship in economic
development. They took the attitude: “the firm is shadowy
entity and entrepreneur even shadowed or at least is shady
when he is not shadowy”
The economic history of the presently developed
countries, for example, America, Russia and Japan tends
to support the fact that the economy is an effect for which
entrepreneurship is the cause. The crucial role played by
the entrepreneurs in the development of the western
countries has made the people of underdeveloped
countries too much conscious of the significance of
entrepreneurship for economic development. Now, people
have begun to realize that for achieving the goal of
economic development, it is necessary to increase
entrepreneurship both qualitatively and quantitatively in
the country it is only active and enthusiastic entrepreneurs
who fully explore the potentialities of the country‟s
available resources – labour, technology and capital
Schumpeter visualized the entrepreneur as the key figure
in economic development because of his role in
introducing innovations. Parson and Smelser described
entrepreneurship as one of the two necessary conditions
for economic development, the other being the increased
output of capital. Harbison includes entrepreneurs among
the prime movers of innovations, and sayigh simply
describes entrepreneurship as a necessary dynamic force.
It is also opined that development does not occur
spontaneously as a natural consequence when economic
conditions are in some sense „right‟: a catalyst or agent is
always needed, and this requires an entrepreneurial ability.
It is the ability that he perceives opportunities which either
others do not see or care about. Essentially, the
entrepreneurs searches for change, see need and their
brings together the manpower, a material and capital
required to respond the opportunity what he sees. Also
Morita, the president of Sony who adopted the company‟s
products to create Walkman personal Stereo and India‟s
Gulshan Kumar of T-Series who skimmed the audio-
cassette starves vast Indian market are the clearest
examples of such able entrepreneurs.
The role of entrepreneurship in economic development
varies from economy to economy depending upon its
material resources, industrial climate and the
responsiveness of the political system to the
entrepreneurial function. The entrepreneurs contribute
more in favorable opportunity conditions than in the
economics with relatively less favorable opportunity
conditions.
Viewed from the opportunity conditions point of view the
underdeveloped regions due to the paucity of funds, lack
of skilled labor and non-existence of minimum social and
economic overheads, are less conductive to the emergency
particularly of innovative entrepreneurs. In such regions,
entrepreneurship does not emerge out of industrial
background with well developed institutions to support
and encourage it. Therefore, entrepreneurs in such regions
may not be an innovator but an imitator who would copy
the innovations introduced by the innovative entrepreneurs
of the developed regions. In these areas, according to Mc
Celland‟s concept of personality aspect of
entrepreneurship some people with high achievement
motivation come forward to behave in an entrepreneurial
way to change the stationary inertia, as they would not be
satisfied with the present status that they have in the
society.
Under the conditions of paucity of funds and the problem
of imperfect market in underdeveloped regions, the
entrepreneurs are bound to launch their enterprises on a
small-scale. As imitation requires lesser funds than
innovations, it is realized that such regions should have
more imitative entrepreneurs. And, it is also felt that
imitation of innovations introduced in developed regions
on a massive scale can brings about rapid economic
development in underdeveloped regions also. But, it does
not mean that such imitation requires in any way lesser
ability on the part of entrepreneurs.
Further, India which itself is an underdeveloped country
aims at decentralized industrial structure to militate the
regional imbalances in levels of economic development,
small-scale entrepreneurship in such industrial structure
plays an important role to achieve balanced regional
development It is unequivocally believed that small-scale
industries provide immediate large-scale employment,
ensure a more equitable distribution of national income
and also facilitate an effective resource mobilization of
capital and skill which might otherwise remain unutilized.
Lastly, the establishment of entrepreneurship development
institutes and alike by the Indian Government during the
last decades is a good testimony to her strong realization
about the premium mobile role of entrepreneurship plays
in economic development of the country.
International Journal of Management and Social Sciences Research (IJMSSR) ISSN: 2319-4421 Volume 6, No. 1, January 2017
Impact Factor: 4.954 www.irjcjournals.org
18
Every country is very keen in promoting its economic
development. Economic development implies
development of agriculture and industry resulting in an
increase in the per capita income of the country. It is clear
that economic development cannot occur spontaneously.
The economic development largely depends on human
resources. Again, human resources alone cannot produce
economic development. It requires an agent who is
nothing but a dynamic entrepreneur. The entrepreneur
really acts as a hero in the drama of economic
development. The crucial role being played by
entrepreneur in the economic development of a country
can be studied under the following heads.
Coordinating Role:
The essential function of an entrepreneur is to coordinate
the various factors of production. Co ordination involves
selection of the right type of factors, employment of each
factor in the right quantity, use of the best of best
technology, division of labour etc. He must also see that
the best combination of factors is making available for the
production process. Schumpeter feels that economic
development will be a reality if new combinations of
factors of production are undertaken. In the absence of
this coordination role, the factors of production will
remain idle in the country thus; entrepreneurs enhance
economic growth by coordinating and integrating the
resources available in the country.
Agent’s Role:
Entrepreneurs are aptly called agents of change.
Entrepreneurs act as catalyst or agent of economic
development by perceiving opportunities, set up business
undertakings and industries and thereby make economic
transformation. Thus, economic development is an effect
for which entrepreneurship is the cause.
Role of Innovation:
Innovation is a key to entrepreneurship innovation
implies the commercial application of an invention. As an
innovator the entrepreneur assumes the role of a pioneer
and an industrial leader. Entrepreneurs have contributed
May innovation is developing new products and in the
existing products and services. All these have resulted in
economic development by providing more employment
more income etc. In fact the intentional activity raises the
productive efficiency of the economy resulting in greater
output and income. Schumpeter finds the secret of
economic development in this rising productivity. Thus,
innovating entrepreneurship can alter the production
function of nations and bring about rapid development.
Risk Assumption Role:
The most important function of an entrepreneur is the
assumption of risk. Every productive venture involves
risks and production cannot take place if people do not
come forward to bear risks. They economic reward for
risk bearing is profit. The quantum of profit depends upon
the quantum of risks undertaken. Profit leads to saving of
wealth which ultimately goes to capital formation which is
the basic ingredient for economic development. Thus,
entrepreneurs promote economic development by coming
forward to assume risks of productive ventures.
Imitating Role:
Entrepreneurs in developing countries take the role of
imitators who generally copy the innovations introductive
by the innovative entrepreneurs of the developed
countries. They copy the organization technology and the
products of innovation from other developed regions.
They are capable of adopting the innovative technology to
the local conditions prevailing in the country and establish
business enterprises. Imitative entrepreneurship seems to
be the best medicine for underdeveloped countries to
overcome their entrepreneurial ills and bring about
substantial economic development. They constitute the
main spring of development of underdeveloped regions.
Capital Formation Role: Entrepreneurs promote capital formation by mobilizing the
idle savings of the public. Again, the profits they earn
lead to saving of wealth which ultimately goes to capital
formation. Entrepreneurs have been referred to as the
human agents‟ needed to mobilize capital to exploit
natural resources to create markets and to carry on trade.
Without capital formation economic development would
remain static.
Balancing Role:
Developing countries like India aims at decentralized
industrial structure to remove the regional imbalances in
the levels of economic development. Entrepreneurs play a
dominant role to achieve balanced regional development
by starting small-scale industries. Small-scale industries
provide immediate large-scale employment, ensure a more
equitable distribution on national income and thus
facilitate balanced regional development. Moreover, it
should be noted that from small enterprises, entrepreneurs
get inspiration to start large units which have a wider
impact on the economy as whole.
Status Transformation Role:
Entrepreneurs create wealth generate employment and
income and thereby they increase the standard of livings of
the people. People are able to have a better standard of
living by getting improved products and comforts
provided by entrepreneurs. Increase in the standard of
living automatically promotes and stimulates economic
development and it has the effect of reducing the wide
disparity in income levels. It also helps to reduce the
concentration of economic power.
International Journal of Management and Social Sciences Research (IJMSSR) ISSN: 2319-4421 Volume 6, No. 1, January 2017
Impact Factor: 4.954 www.irjcjournals.org
19
Employment Generation Role:
Entrepreneurs with high achievement motivation come
forward to establish business and industry venture which
provide immediate large-scale employment. Thus
entrepreneurs help to reduce the unemployment problem
in the country. In fact, unemployment problem is the root
cause of all socio-economic problems.
Export Promotion Role:
Entrepreneurs also promote a country‟s export trade which
is an important ingredient to economic development.
Thus, the entrepreneurs are always on the lookout of
making the economic system at its dynamic best. They
stimulate progress by means of their entrepreneurial
activities and act as mainspring of economic development.
They have the potential of transforming their
underdeveloped economies into developed one. Thus it is
clear that entrepreneurship in economic development of a
country can best be put as an economy is the effect for
which entrepreneurship is the cause
CONCLUSION
Development Economic development implies
development of agriculture and industry resulting in an
increase in the per capita income of the country. It is clear
that economic development cannot occur spontaneously.
The economic development largely depends on human
resources. Again, human resources alone cannot produce
economic development. It requires an agent who is
nothing but a dynamic entrepreneur. The entrepreneur
really acts as a hero in the drama of economic
development. The crucial role being played by
entrepreneur in the economic de Thus, the entrepreneurs
are always on the lookout of making the economic system
at its dynamic best. They stimulate progress by means of
their entrepreneurial activities and act as mainspring of
economic development. They have the potential of
transforming their underdeveloped economies into
developed one. Thus it is clear that entrepreneurship in
economic development of a country can best be put as an
economy is the effect for which entrepreneurship is the
cause development of a country can be studied under the
following heads.
REFERENCES
[1] Gordon E., (2013) Entrepreneurship
Development, Himalaya publishing House,
Chennai, p-1.
[2] Khanka S.S., (2008) Entrepreneurial
Development, Chand & Company, New Delhi, pp-
43-45.
[3] Khanka S. S. (1994) Industrial Development
Backward Areas, Himalaya Publishing House,
New Delhi, p-32.
[4] Kuchhal S.C. (1963) Industrial Economy of
India, Chaitanya Publishing House, Allahabad, p-
78.
[5] Malen W. (1962) Prospects of Indian
Development, The Free Press, Glance, Illinois,
p112.
[6] McCllent ,D.C, (1961) The Achieving Society,
The Free Press, New York, p-82.
[7] Person. T and N. J. Smelser (1956) Economy and
Society, The Free Press, New York, p-33.
[8] Schumpeter J.A., (1934) The Theory of Economic
Development, Harvard University Press,
Cambridge, p-27.
[9] Smith Adam., (1776) An Enquiry Into The Nature
and Causes of Wealth of Nation, GR sons Ltd,
London, p-123.