rogelio chavez-rubio, a205 656 470 (bia jan. 30, 2014)

8/13/2019 Rogelio Chavez-Rubio, A205 656 470 (BIA Jan. 30, 2014)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rogelio-chavez-rubio-a205-656-470-bia-jan-30-2014 1/5

EDWRD CIUENES ESQ

Executve Oe r Iigraon Revew

Bard Immigratin pealsOce the Clerk

57 Leburg Pike. Sute Fas Chc, Vrgna

760 WST SMPE ROD SUIE 10POMPNO EACH F 33064

HS ICE Oic of Cif Couns TC3900 Powr Li RodPompo c FL 33072

Nm: CHVEZRUBIO, ROGEIO 205-656470

D of is oic 1/ 30/ 2014

losed s a copy of he Bod's deon d orde he above-eeed ase.

lose

P MbAdkins-Blach, Chares KManue EseGuenelsberger Joh

Seey,

CwDo Ca

Chef ek

Docket

For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished

Cite as: Rogelio Chavez-Rubio A205 656 470 (BIA Jan 30 2014)



CHAVEZ-RUBIO, ROGELOA20565670B.T.C.3900 N POWERLINE RDOMPANO BEACH FL 33073

Name: CHAVEZ-RUBIO, ROGEIO

Execuive Oce Imiain eview

Bard Imgratn ppealOce the Clerk

5107 ebug ke, Sue 2000Fl Chh, gna 20530

HS/ ICE Oice of Chie Counsl - C3900 ower ine oadPmpano Beach, FL 33072

A 205656- 70

Dt of hs oce 1 30 201

ce a cpy e a' ec he abveeence cae Th cpy i begpve yu a a curey Yu aey r epeeave ha been eve wih hecin puua 8 CF § 1292(a) he aache eciin er ha yu beremve m he Ue ae am a mgain Juge ecii reg ha yue emve, any pe revew e aache eciin mu be e wi receivey he appprae cu appea w ay he ae he eciin

cre

MbAslach Chae K

Mae seGeelege Joh

cerey

D c tDa arCe Cerk

w: k

Cite as: Rogelio Chavez-Rubio, A205 656 470 (BIA Jan. 30, 2014)



U.S Dement of JiceEx�cutive Oce r Immaon Reew

Decso of he Bord o mgaon Apeal

Fas Cc, Vrgna 0530

le: A205 656 470 Pompo Beach FL

In re: OGLIO CHAVEZRB

ROA PROCEDS

APA

Date

ON BAL OF PODNT Edwa Cees, quire

O BEA O DHS ober D'AoAssit Cef Cose

APICATION Coice; vouy depare

JAN 30 214

Te reponde a tive itzen of Meo as apee om e migrtio Judgesdecson ate eptember 20, 213 he Immigraon Judge un te respoet reovaea ordered reove. Te record e remane

s or revews mgrton Juge dng o c incuding ings as o thecredibiit of temon uder te cey eoneou" san. See 8 C.F § 103. ()(3)();Matter ofRS-H 23 &N Dec. 29 (BA 203) Mae fSH, 23 & Dec 62 (BIA 2002). Board revews uesons of law, creton, an jugmet al oter es rased i an

mmgrtio Judge decon de novo. See 8 C.F § 1003(d)(3)()

he deed respoent ws ae n reova roceeg on Augut 2 23 (x ) isrst ering wa o Augut 2, 23 (Tr at I). e was gre wo hot continuaces o dan atoey (Tr at 3, 8-9). e apee on Seeber 2, 23 (Tr t He to theImmtio dge ht e had re aoey an ha to that attoey of te herg te.However e aoe not apear he heag or le a otce o Appee (Tr at 23).At t o te Immtio Juge dd ot qure of te reponde whether e sed tocontnue proeedng to nd out wh the aoe had no apered or to n anoter attoeyNor e mmigraon Juge as te respone wheher e wed to waive s rgt oounse Inste, he to ge proeede wt e remova eag (r a 3)Peg were tke he respoet admie he cu legto n he oice to Apearad oede reovilt r eing preent he Unite te wthou auorzo n heImmgrao Juge un m removbe s arge (r t 4)

Te igraon Jdge he aked te reone qetios o deerne wether he wasstauorly elgbe r reief. Because e respodent s umrie, has no chre, n spre eman i Meico the Imgrao uge coe tat the resodent was otatutori eigibe r cceltion of reov (r at 5-6 Because e respoen i hed no r of ret to exco, e graon Judge oncuded ta e w no tautorleigbe r aum ioing of reoval, or protecon der te Convento Agast ote(Tr a 6 ecaue e repode h bee convite of a ony te Imgrato Judgecolded hat te respoent ws ot egbe r Dee Ato r Cdood Arvals

Cite as: Rogelio Chavez Rubio A205 656 470 (BIA Jan 30 2014)



A205 656 470

(DACA) (Tr at 16) The Immgation Judge asked the respondet f he wshe to apply rvounty depe, and the respondent sad "no (Tr at 1617)

On appeal, the esponent says e was consed by the proceedins wnte a continuace,ad wnted to appy r DACA d ount depaure

Respondents in immigration proceedings have the statutor and eguator prviege obeng represented, at no expense to the Goveent, b counse o te choosng secions240(b)4)(A), 292 o the Act; 8 USC §§ 1229a(b)4A), 1362 also 8 CFR§§ 1003.16(b, 12403 1240(a), 12401 (c)(); Mattr ofCB, 25 I&N Dec 888, 88990BI 2012) Where the stautoy and eglatory pivege o e representation is not expresslywaved, as s the case ee, n order to eannglly eectuate the privlege, e Immiratonudge must ant a reasonabe and eaistic amont of time and prode a ir opporunty r arespondent to seek, spea th, and retain counse Te ount o tme that s approprate wldepend on the speccs o the nddual case Mat of CB upra. C Hnaz Gl vGonzas 47 3d 803, 805808 9h Cr 2007) Iigation Jude denied aen's statutor

rght to consel n dening contnuance when alens aoe ied to appe at reovalheg) In light o te ct that te respondent eeve e had contacted wth an aoey torepresent hm in reoval proceeings the Iigraton udge shoud have consered therespondents reqest r adtiona contnuce 8 CFR §§ 1003298, 12406 CMatr ofRajah 25 I& Dec 127 (BIA 2009; Mattr of Hahmi 24 l& Dec 785 BIA 2009

Had he ad te benet of conse, te espondent a have to the Iigration Jude thathe wished to be anted vontary depaure Conseqent, the appea w be sstaned, and erecod wl be remaded to the Imigration Judge r a nw hean On reand, the respondentshoud e alowed to app r ounty depe nd an oter eie r whic he s sautorelgbe

Accordn, the owi ordes wil be entered

ORDE: The appeal s sstained

RR ORDR The record s emanded to he Imgrato dge rherproceedings consistet w the reoing opon ad entry o a new decson

In order r a waver to e vaid, an Immigraton udge must eea (1) nqre specicas to whether a respondent wshes to contnue without a lawyer and (2) receive a kowng andoluny aave resonse Mattr fCB supra, at 890 1

2

Cite as: Rogelio Chavez-Rubio, A205 656 470 (BIA Jan. 30, 2014)



In the Matter of:CHVEZ-RUBIO ROGELIO

ESPONDNT

. , •

a�u

U.S DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICEEXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW

IIGATION COURT3900 POWERLINE ROAD

POMPANO BEACH, 3073

Case No: A20565640

IN REMOVA PROCEEDINGS WRITTEN ECISION AN

ORDER OF TE IMMIGATION UDGE

Upon the bass of espondent's adssons, I have detemned that the

espondent s subject to emoval on the chage{s) n the otice to Appea

Respondent s nelgble fo elef fom emoval The espondet appeaedtoday fo hs thrd hearng The respondent was gven to contnuaces toappea wth counsel The espondent contended that he ha an attorneyhoweve no apeaance was enteed and the Court wated 40 nutes beyon hs

scheduled hearng tme and no one appeaed on hs behalf The Coutpoceeded See Secton 239 (a) (1) (F) IN Te responent then adtted theallegatons on the NTA and desgnated Mexco as hs country of eoval Whlethe espondent has been n the Unted States fo 14 eas, he has noqualfyng relatve (s} fo 2B Cancellaton of Reoval The espondentexpessed no fea of ha o totue f etuned to hs Couny Theespondent was offee Volutnay Depatue, howeve dd not wsh to qualfyfo that form of elef The espondent s nelgble fo DACA based on hsfeony concton (Ex 3, 4 & 5} Hee, the esondent has no elef foemoval avalable to h Accodngl

It s EREBY ORDERED tat te espondent be emoved fo the Unted Statesto EXICO on the chage(s contaned n the Notce to

Appea

ny alen aganst ho a fnal ode of emoval s outstandng by reason ofbeng a ebe of any of the classes descbed n INA secton 2(a) whowlfully fals or refuses to pesent hself o heself for reoval at thete and place equed by the Attoney General shall be fned and/ompsoned fo up to ten yeas Futhe, any alen who wllfully fals oefuses to depat fo the Unted States pusuant to a fnal removal odeo pesent fo emoval at the tme and place equed by the Attoney Genealshall pay a cvl penalt of not moe than $500 to the Cossone fo eachday the alen s n volaton of ths secton

Appeal Appeal D� 013

REX FORDImmgaton udgeDate: e 20 1

CERTIFICTE OF SERVICETHIS DOCjNT WAS SERVED B: AIL {) PERSONA SERVIC TO: [ AL 3 ALIEN co Custodal Offcer �Alien s ATT/REP [vHSDATE: fL BY: COURT STAFF /

rogelio chavez-rubio, a205 656 470 (bia jan. 30, 2014)

Documents