RODRIGUEZODONNELLGONZALEZWILLIAMSPCATTORNEVSANDCOUNSELLORSAiLAWWASHINGSONCHICAGONEWYORKCARLOSRODRIGUEZESQDIRECTDIAL2029732999rodriguez@rofewcAdmittedinNewJerseyendDCREPLYTO1250CONNECiICUTAVENUENWSUITE200WASHINGTONDC20036TELEPNONE2022933300FACSIMILE2022933307July92010ViaEMailandAandDeliveryMsKazenGregorySecretaryFederalMaritimeCommissionOfficeoftheSecretary800NCapitolStreetNWWashingtonDC205730001REMitsuiOSKLinesLtdvGlobalLinkLogisticsIncetalDocketNo09O1DearMsGregoryCITICORPPLAZA8930WBRYNMAWRAVECHICAGOILLINOIS60611TELEPHONE7733I43000FACSIMILE773I4171993ROCKEFELLERPLAZANewYORKNY10111TELEPHONE2123328136FACSIMILe2I23323101iNcoCLr711C7rcWeattachheretofifteen15copiesofCJRWORLDENTERPRISESINCandCHADJROSENBERGsAnswerandAffirmativeDefensestoMitsuiOSKLinesLtdsAmendedComplaintintheabovereferencedactionDuetotheoutofstatebusinesslocationandtravelscheduleofRespondentChadJRosenbergtheoriginalsignatureofMrRosenbergcouldnotbesubmittedaspartoftheattacheddocumentsInaccordancewithRule11146CFR502111wewillforwardthedocumentbearingMrRosenbergsoriginalsignatureonceweobtainsameIfyouhaveanyquestionsregardingtheaforementionedmaterialspleasecontactCarlosRodriguezat2029732999VerytrulyyoursByRODRIGUEZODONNELLGONZALEZWILLIAMSPCCarlosRodriguezEsqZhengXieEsqBERMANFINKVANHORNPCBenjaminIFinkEsqNealFWeinrichEsq

MsKarenGregoryJuly92010Page2of2CcMarcJFinkEsqAnneEMickeyEsqHeatherMSpringEsqSherBlackwellLLP1850MStreetNWSuite900WashingtonDC20036AttorneysforMitsuiOSKLinesLtdDavidPStreetEsqBrendanCollinsEsqGallandKharaschMorseGarrnklePC1054ThirtyFirstStreetNWWashingtonDC20007AttorneysforGlobalLinkLogisticsIncWarrenLDeanJrEsqRobertAShaprioEsqSeanMcGowanEsqRyanKManagerEsqThompsonCoburnLLP1909KStreetNWWashingtonDC20006AttorneysforOlympusGrowthFundIIILPOlympusExecutiveFundLPLouisJMischiantiDavidCardenasKeithHeffernan

BEFORETHEFEDERALMARITIMECOMMISSIONcamslORGlRfcZlLil3P41MITSUIOSKLINESLTDComplainantDOCKETNO0901vGLOBALLINKLOGISTICSINCOLYMPUSPARTNERSLPOLYMPUSGROWTHFUNDIIILPOLYMPUSEXECUTIVEFUNDLPLOUISJMISCHIANTIDAVIDCARDENASKEITHHEFFERNANCJRWORLDENTERPRISESINCANDCHADJROSENBERGRespondentsCJRWORLDEF7TERPRiSESINCANDCHADROSENBERGSVERIFIEDANSWERANDAFFIRMATIVEDEFENSESTOMITSUIOSKLINESLTDSAMENDEDCOMPLAINTRespondentsCJRWORLDENTERPRISESINCCJRandCHADJROSENBERGRosenbergbyandthroughtheirattorneysRodriguezODonnellGonzalezWilliamsPCandBermanFinkVanHornPCsubmittheirVerifiedAnswerandAffirmativeDefensestoMitsuiOSKLinesLtdsAmendedComplaintasfollowsIComplainantAComplainantMitsuiOSKLinesLtdMOLisacorporationorganizedandexistingunderthelawsofJapanMOLisavesseloperatingcommoncarrieroperatingintheUSforeigntrades

ANSWERCJRandRosenbergarewithoutknowledgeorinformationsufficienttoformabeliefastothetruthoftheallegationscontainedinparagraphIAoftheComplaintandthereforedenythesameBMOLsmailingaddressis11Toranomon2chomeMinatokuTokyoJapanANSWERCJRandRosenbergarewithoutknowledgeorinformationsullcienttoformabeliefastothetruthoftheallegationscontainedinparagraphIBoftheComplaintandthereforedenythesameIIRespondentsARespondentGlobalLinkLogisticsIncGlobalLinkisacorporationorganizedunderthelawsofDelawareGlobalLinksmailingaddressisLakesideCenter1990LakesideParkwaySuite300TuckerGeorgia30084GlobalLinkisalicensedoceantransportationintermediaryOTIthatoperatesasanonvesseloperatingcommoncarrierNVOCCANSWERCJRandRosenbergdenytheallegationscontainedinparagraphIIAoftheComplaintasstatedCJRandRosenbergadmitthatGlobalLinkisacorporationorganizedunderthelawsofDelawareandthatitsmailingaddressisLakesideCenter1990LakesideParkwaySuite300TuckerGeorgia30084CJRandRosenbergarewithoutknowledgeorinformationsufficienttoformabeliefastothetruthoftheremainingallegationscontainedinparagraphIIAoftheComplaintandthereforedenythesameBRespondentOlympusGrowthFundIIILPOGFisaDelawarelimitedpartnershiphavingaregisteredagentatTheCorporationTrustCompanyCorporationTrustCenter1209OrangeStreetWilmingtonDE19801anditsprincipalplaceofbusinessatMetroCenterOneStationPlaceStamfordCT06902OGFwasanowneroftherespondentGlobalLinkduringperiodsrelevanttothiscomplaintANSWERCJRandRosenbergdenytheallegationscontainedinparagraphIIBoftheComplaintasstatedCJRandRosenbergadmitthatOGFisaDelawarelimited2

partnershiphavingaregisteredagentatTheCorporationTrustCompanyCorporationTrustCenter1209OrangeStreetWilmingtonDE19801andaprincipalplaceofbusinessatMetroCenterOneStationPlaceStamfordCT06902CJRandRosenbergadmitthatOGFwasanownerofGlobalLinkfromMay92003throughJune72006AnsweringfurthergiventhatMOLwasawareofthepracticeofreroutingatGlobalLinkwhichisthesubjectmatteroftheComplaintandinfactapprovedofandencouragedthepracticeandsinceMOLfiledtheComplaintonMay52009theonlyperiodoftimeinwhichOGFwasanownerofGlobalLinkwhichispossiblyrelevanttotheComplaintistheperiodfromMay62006throughJune72006See46CFR50263xCRespondentOlympusExecutiveFundLPOEFisaDelawarelimitedpartnershiphavingaregisteredagentatTheCorporationTrustCompanyCorporationTrustCenter1209OrangeStreetilmingtonDE19801anditsprincipalplaceofbusinessatMetroCenterOneStationPlaceStamfordCT06902OEFwasanowneroftherespondentGlobalLinkduringperiodsrelevanttothiscomplaintANSWERCJRandRosenbergdenytheallegationscontainedinparagraphIICoftheComplaintasstatedCJRandRosenbergadmitthatOEFisaDelawarelimitedpartnershiphavingaregisteredagentatTheCorporationTrustCompanyCorporationTrustCenter1209OrangeStreetWilmingtonDE19801andaprincipalplaceofbusinessatMetroCenterOneStationPlaceStamfordCT06902CJRandRosenbergadmitthatOEFwasanownerofGlobalLinkfromMay92003throughJune72006AnsweringfurthergiventhatMOLwasawareofthepracticeofreroutingatGlobalLinkwhichisthesubjectmatteroftheComplaintandinfactapprovedofandencouragedthepracticeandsinceMOLfiledtheComplaintonMay52009theonlyperiodoftimeinwhichOEFwasanownerofGlobalLinkwhichispossiblyrelevantto3

theComplaintistheperiodfromMay62006throughJune72006See46CFR50263aDRespondentOlympusPartnersOlympusPartnersisaConnecticutgeneralpartnershiphavingitsprincipalplaceofbusinessatMetroCenterOneStationPlaceStamfordCT06902OlympusPartnersisaprivateequityfirmafTliatedwithOGFandOEFANSWERCJRandRosenbergdenytheallegationscontainedinpazagraphIIDoftheComplaintERespondentsLouisJMischiantiDavidCardenasandKeithHeffernanarepartnersinOlympusPartnerswithabusinessaddressatMetroCenterOneStationPlaceStamfordCT06902andwereofficersanddirectorsofGlobalLinkduringperiodsrelevanttothiscomplaintANSWERCJRandRosenbergdenytheallegationscontainedinparagraphIIEoftheComplaintasstatedCJRandRosenbergadmitthatLouisJMischiantiDavidCardenasandKeithHeffernanarepartnersinOlympusPartnerswitiabusinessaddressatMetroCenterOneStationPlaceStamfordCT06902CJRandRosenbergadmitthatMrMischiantiMrCardenasandMrHeffernanwereofficersanddirectorsofGlobalLinkduringtheperiodoftimeinwhichOGFandOEFwereownersAnsweringfurthergiventhatMOLwasawareofthepracticeofreroutingatGlobalLinkwhichisthesubjectmatteroftheComplaintandinfactapprovedofandencouragedthepracticeandsinceMOLfiledtheComplaintonMay52009theonlyperiodoftimeinwhichMrMischiantiMrCardenasandMrHeffernanwereofficersanddirectorsofGlobalLinkwhichispossiblyrelevanttotheComplaintistheperiodfromMay62006throughJune72006See46CFR50263aFRespondentCJRWorldEnterprisesIncCJRisaFloridacorporationhavingaregisteredagentatFloridaFilingandSearchServicesInc155OfficePlazaDriveSuiteATallahasseeFL32301anditsprincipalplaceofbusinessat4

6025SandySpringsCircleAtlantaGeorgiaCJRwasanownerofGlobalLinkduringperiodsrelevanttothiscomplaintANSWERCJRandRosenbergdenytheallegationscontainedinparagraphIIFoftheComplaintasstatedCJRandRosenbergadmitthatCJRisaFloridacorporationhavingaregisteredagentatFloridaFilingandSearchServicesInc155OfficePlazaDriveSuiteATallahasseeFL32301CJRandRosenbergadmitthatCJRwasanownerofGlobalLinkfromMay92003throughJune72006AnsweringfurthergiventhatMOLwasawareofthepracticeofreroutingatGlobalLinkwhichisthesubjectmatteroftheComplaintandinfactapprovedofandencouragedthepracticeandsinceMOLfiledtheComplaintonMay52009theonlyperiodoftimeinwhichCJRwasanownerofGlobalLinkwhichispossiblyrelevanttotheComplaintistheperiodfromMay62006throughJune72006See46CFR50263aGRespondentChadRosenberghasabusinessaddressat6025SandySpringsCircleAtlantaGeorgiaChadRosenbergistheownerofCJRandwasanofficeranddirectorofGlobalLinkduringperiodsrelevanttothiscomplaintANSWERCJRandRosenbergdenytheallegationscontainedinparagraphIIGoftheComplaintasstatedCRandRosenbergadmitthatRosenbergistheownerofCJRCJRandRosenbergadmitthatRosenbergwasanofficeranddirectorofGlobalLinkduringtheperiodoftimeinwhichCJRwasanownerofGlobalLinkAnsweringfurthergiventhatMOLwasawareofthepracticeofreroutingatGlobalLinkwhichisthesubjectmatteroftheComplaintandinfactapprovedofandencouragedthepracticeandsinceMOLfiledtheComplaintonMay52009theonlyperiodoftimeinwhichCJRwasanownerofGlobalLinkwhichispossiblyrelevanttotheComplaintistheperiodfromMay62006throughJune72006See46CFR50263a5

IIIJurisdictionThisComplaintisbeingfiledpursuanttoSection11aoftheShippingAct46USC41301MOLisseekingreparationsforinjuriescausedtoitbyGlobalLinkOGFOEFOlympusPartnersLouisJMischiantiDavidCardenasKeithHeffernanCJRandChadRosenbergcollectivelytheRespondentsasaresultoftheirviolationsofSections10a1and10d1oftheShippingAct46USC41102a41102cAsmoreparticularlyallegedbelowtheRespondentsknowinglyandwillfullyengagedinaschemetofraudulentlyobtainoceantransportationforpropertyforlessthantheratesandorchargesthatwouldotherwiseapplyMoreoverasdemonstratedbythesepracticesincludingthepreparationoffalsedocumentsandprovisionoffalseinformationtoMOLinviolationof46CFR51531etheRespondentsfailedtoestablishobserveandenforcejustandreasonableregulationsandpracticesrelatingtoarconnectedwithreceivinghandlinganddeliveringpropertyTheactivitiesgivingrisetothiscomplaintfirstcametoMOLsattentionin2008whenMOLwascontactedinconnectionwithanarbitrationproceedingbetweenRespondentGlobalLinkandRespondentsOlympusPartnersOEFOGFMischiantiCardenasHeffernanCJRRosenbergandothersANSWERTotheextenttheparagraphsinsectionIIIpurporttocharacterizethenatureoftheactionnoresponseisrequiredTotheextenttheparagraphsinSectionIIIcontainallegationsoffactastowhicharesponseisrequiredfromCJRandRosenbergCRandRosenbergdenytheallegationscontainedinsectionIIIoftheComplaintCJRandRosenbergalsodenythatMOLisentitledtothereliefdiscussedinsectionIIIIVStatementofFactsandMattersComplainedOfAMOLbegandoingbusinesswithGlobalLinkonoraboutMay112004ANSWERCJRandRosenbergadmittheallegationinparagraphIVABSinceMayof2004MOLhasenteredinto5servicecontractswithGlobalLinkhavingthefollowingservicecontractnumbers5159351A045159351A055159351A065159351A07and5159351A08ANSWERCJRandRosenbergdenytheallegationscontainedinparagraphIVBoftheComplaintasstatedCJRandRosenbergshowthattheservicecontractsidentifiedinparagraphIVBoftheComplaintspeakforthemselvesandarethebestevidenceoftheir6

contentsAnsweringfurtherCJRandRosenbergarewithoutinformationorknowledgesufficienttoformabeliefastothetruthofanyallegationsconcerningGlobalLinksconductactivitiesorbusinesswithMOLduringtheperiodoftimefromJune82006throughthepresentwhenCJRwasnotanownerofandRosenbergwasnotanofficerordirectorofGlobalLinkalthoughCJRandRosenbergazeawarethatGlobalLinkcontinuedthepracticeofreroutingfollowingtheperiodoftimeinwhichCJRwasanownerofGlobalLinkintothemiddleof2007CTheservicecontractsprovidedbothporttoportratesandporttodoororthroughratestoinlanddestinationsintheUnitedStatesAtthetimeeachservicecontractwasnegotiatedGlobalLinkhadanopportunitytonegotiateratestoanyinlanddestinationrequiredbyitscustomersTheservicecontractscouldalsobeamendedtoaddnewratesifadditionaldestinationswererequiredatanytimeIndeedthecontractswereamendedonnumerousinstancesMorespecificallySC5159351A04wasamended32timesSC5159351A05wasamended33timesSC5159351A06wasamended19timesSC5159351A07wasamended24timesandSC5159351A08wasamended6timesANSWERCJRandRosenbergdenytheallegationscontainedinparagraphIVCoftheComplaintasstatedCJRandRosenbergshowthattheservicecontractsbetweenMOLandGlobalLinkaswellastheamendmentstheretospeakforthemselvesandarethebestevidenceoftheircontentsAnsweringfurtherCJRandRosenbergazewithoutinformationorknowledgesufficienttoformabeliefastothetruthofanyallegationsconcerningGlobalLinksconductactivitiesorbusinesswithMOLduringtheperiodoftimefromJune82006throughthepresentwhenCJRwasnotanownerofandRosenbergwasnotanofficerordirectorofGlobalLinkalthoughCJRandRosenbergareawarethatGlobalLinkcontinuedthepracticeofreroutingfollowingtheperiodoftimeinwhichCJRwasanownerofGlobalLinkintothemiddleof2007DTheservicecontractsenteredintobetweenMOLandGlobalLinkweresubjecttovarioustariffrulesincludingtherulesrelatingtodiversiondefinedasa7

changeintheoriginalbilleddestinationAtalltimesrelevanttothiscomplaintMOLstariffrulesrequiredshipperstorequestanydiversionofcargoinwritingandrequiredthepaymentofadiversionchargeaswellasthedifferenceinpricebetweentheoriginalandnewdestinationsANSWERCJRandRosenbergdenytheallegationscontainedinparagraphIVDoftheComplaintasstatedCJRandRosenbergshowthattheservicecontractsbetweenMOLandGlobalLinkspeakforthemselvesandarethebestevidenceoftheircontentsCJRandRosenbergshowfurtherthatpazagraphNDoftheComplaintcontainsconclusionsoflawastowhichnoresponseisrequiredAnsweringfurtherCJRandRosenbergazewithoutinformationorknowledgesufficienttoformabeliefastothetruthofanyallegationsconcerningGlobalLinksconductactivitiesorbusinesswithMOLduringtheperiodoftimefromJune82006throughthepresentwhenCJRwasnotanownerofandRosenbergwasnotanofficerordirectorofGlobalLinkalthoughCJRandRosenbergareawazethatGlobalLinkcontinuedthepracticeofreroutingfollowingtheperiodoftimeinwhichCJRwasanownerofGlobalLinkintothemiddleof2007EFrom2004throughatleast2006GlobalLinkengagedinaschemetodefraudMOLandobtainoceantransportationatrateslowerthantheapplicableservicecontractortariffratesbybookingcargotofalseinlanddestinationswhileintendingtodeliverthecargotodifferentinlanddestinationsGlobalLinkreferredtothispracticewithvariousnamesincludingsplitroutingmisbookingandreroutingANSWERCJRandRosenbergdenytheallegationscontainedinpazagraphIVEoftheComplaintasstatedCJRandRosenbergadmitthatGlobalLinksometimesengagedinabusinesspracticecalledreroutingwhichiscommonintheindustryandwhichisalsosometimesreferredtoassplitshippingCJRandRosenbergshowfurtherthatMOLwasawarethatGlobalLinkengagedinthispracticeapprovedofthepracticeandencouragedGlobalLinktocontinuethepracticeduetotheimpracticalityofand8

administrativeburdenassociatedwithnegotiatingamultiplicityofcontractpointsCJRandRosenbergthusdenythatGlobalLinkengagedinaschemetodefraudMOLduringtheperiodinwhichCJRwasanownerofGlobalLinkAnsweringfurtherCJRandRosenbergarewithoutinformationorknowledgesufficienttoformabeliefastothetruthofanyallegationsconcerningGlobalLinksconductactivitiesorbusinesswithMOLduringtheperiodoftimefromJune82006throughthepresentwhenCJRwasnotanownerofandRosenbergwasnotanofficerordirectorofGlobalLinkalthoughCJRandRosenbergareawarethatGlobalLinkcontinuedthepracticeofreroutingfollowingtheperiodoftimeinwhichCJRwasanownerofGlobalLinkintothemiddleof2007FThisschemewascarriedoutwiththefullknowledgeandparticipationofRespondentsOlympusPartnersOEFOGFMischiantiCardenasHefTernanCJRandRosenbergANSWERCJRandRosenbergdenytheallegationscontainedinparagraphIVFoftheComplaintasstatedCJRandRosenbergadmitthatOEFOGFCardenasHeffernanCJRandRosenbergwereawarethatGlobalLinksometimesengagedinabusinesspracticecalledreroutingwhichiscommonintheindustryandwhichisalsosometimesreferredtoassplitshippingCJRandRosenbergdenyanyschemebyanyoftheRespondentstodefraudMOLGInordertocarryoutitsschemeGlobalLinkwouldprovideMOLwithfalseinformationregardingtheultimatedestinationofthecargoThethroughbillofladingissuedbyMOLwouldreflectthefalsedestinationprovidedbyGlobalLinkInlandtransportationbytruckwouldbearrangedbyMOLfromtheportofentryorrailcontaineryardtothefalsedestinationThethroughratefortransportationtothefalsedestinationwouldbebilledbyMOLandpaidbyGlobalLinkANSWERCJRandRosenbergdenytheallegationscontainedinpazagraphIVGasstatedCJRandRosenbergadmitthatwhenGlobalLinkengagedinthebusinesspracticecalledreroutingGlobalLinkwouldprovideMOLwithadestinationotherthanthe9

ultimatedestinationofthecargoCJRandRosenbergadmitthatthebillofladingissuedbyMOLwouldreflectthedestinationprovidedbyGlobalLinkCJRandRosenbergshowfurtherthatMOLwasawarethatGlobalLinkengagedinthispracticeapprovedofthepracticeandencouragedGlobalLinktocontinuethepracticeduetotheimpracticalityofandadministrativeburdenassociatedwithnegotiatingamultiplicityofcontractpointsAnsweringfurtherCJRandRosenbergazewithoutinformationorknowledgesufficienttoformabeliefastothetruthofanyallegationsconcerningGlobalLinksconductactivitiesorbusinesswithMOLduringtheperiodoftimefromJune82006throughthepresentwhenCJRwasnotanownerofandRosenbergwasnotanofficerordirectorofGlobalLinkalthoughCJRandRosenbergareawarethatGlobalLinkcontinuedthepracticeofreroutingfollowingtheperiodoftimeinwhichCJRwasanownerofGlobalLinkintothemiddleof2007HWithoutMOLsknowledgehoweverGlobalLinkwouldissueasecondbillofladingshowingthetrueinlanddestinationGlobalLinkwouldprovidethisbillofladingtothetruckingcompanyandtellthetruckingcompanytodisregardtheinstructionsreceivedfromMOLANSWERCJRandRosenbergdenytheallegationsinparagraphIVHIGlobalLinkwoulddivertthecargointhismannerwithoutsubmittingarequesttoMOLinaccordancewiththeservicecontractandapplicabletariffandwithoutpayingMOLthedifferenceinrateortheapplicablediversionchargesMOLwouldnotevenbenotifiedofthediversionorthetruedestinationofthecargoThusdespiteMOLsissuanceofathroughbillofladingMOLwouldhavenoinformationregardingtheactualdestinationsofthecargooritscontainersANSWERCJRandRosenbergdenytheallegationscontainedinparagraphIVIasstatedCJRandRosenbergadmitthatwhenGlobalLinkengagedinthebusinesspracticecalledreroutingGlobalLinkwouldtypicallynotsubmitarequesttoMOLandwouldnotpaythedifferenceinratetotheextenttherewouldhavebeenanywhichCJRand10

RosenbergdenyoranydiversionchargessameCJRandRosenbergshowfurtherthatMOLwasawarethatGlobalLinkengagedinthispracticeapprovedofthepracticeencouragedGlobalLinktocontinuethepracticeduetotheimpracticalityofandadministrativeburdenassociatedwithnegotiatingamultiplicityofcontractpointsanddidnotobjecttothefactthatGlobalLinkwouldnotsubmitarequesttoMOLwhenitreroutedshipmentsAnsweringfurtherCJRandRosenbergarewithoutinformationorknowledgesufficienttoformabeliefastothetruthofanyallegationsconcerningGlobalLinksconductactivitiesorbusinesswithMOLduringtheperiodoftimefromJune82006throughthepresentwhenCJRwasnotanownerofandRosenbergwasnotanofficerordirectorofGlobalLinkalthoughCJRandRosenbergareawarethatGlobalLinkcontinuedthepracticeofreroutingfollowingtheperiodoftimeinwhichCJRwasanownerofGlobalLinkintothemiddleof2007JThetruedestinationsthatwerehiddenfromMOLwereeitherpointswithhighernegotiatedcontractratesthanthetruedestinationsorpointswithnonegotiatedratesthatGlobalLinkdidnotseektoaddtothecontractsIneitherinstancetheratespaidtoMOLfortransportationtotheshamdestinationswerelessthantheratesthatwereapplicabletotheactualdestinationsandthatshouldhavebeenpaidtoMOLbyGlobalLinkObtainingthelowerrateswasthereasonforthepracticeandfortheconcealmentofGlobalLinksactivitiesfromMOLANSWERCJRandRosenbergdenytheallegationscontainedinparagraphIVJoftheComplaintasstatedCJRandRosenbergadmitthatinsomeinstancesinwhichGlobalLinkreroutedshipmentstheratespaidtoMOLfortransportationtothelocationprovidedtoMOLwerelowerthantheratestotheactuallocationwheretheshipmentwasdeliveredandinotherinstancestherateswerehigherCJRandRosenbergfurtheradmitthatinsomebutnotallinstancesinwhichGlobalLinkreroutedshipmentsthelocationwheretheshipmentwasdeliveredwasapointwithnonegotiatedrateintheservice11

contractandwhichGlobalLinkdidnotseektoaddtothecontractCJRandRosenbergdenythatoneofthereasonsforreroutingwastoreduceGlobalLinkscostsCJRandRosenbergshowfurtherthatMOLwasawarethatGlobalLinkengagedinthispracticeapprovedofthepracticeandencouragedGlobalLinktocontinuethepracticeduetotheimpracticalityofandadministrativeburdenassociatedwithnegotiatingamultiplicityofcontractpointsAnsweringfurtherCJRandRosenbergarewithoutinformationorknowledgesufficienttoformabeliefastothetruthofanyallegationsconcerningGlobalLinksconductactivitiesorbusinesswithMOLduringtheperiodoftimefromJune82006throughthepresentwhenCJRwasnotanownerofandRosenbergwasnotanofficerordirectorofGlobalLinkCJRandRosenbergdenytheremainingallegationscontainedinparagraphIVJoftheComplaintKInordertoconcealthetruedestinationsfromMOLGlobalLinkemployeescreatedfalseinvoicesaddressesandbillsofladingGlobalLinkemployeeswereoftentrainedandremindednottotellrepresentativesofMOLofthetruedestinationofgoodsthatweredivertedandinfacttheyweretrainedtolieiftheywereaskedMoreoverGlobalLinkemployeesweretaughthowtofindrealaddressesinthefalsedestinationcitiestoavoidtippingoffcarriersthatthedestinationsprovidedtothecarrierswerephonyANSWERCJRandRosenbergdenytheallegationscontainedinparagraphIVKoftheComplaintasstatedAnsweringfurtherCJRandRosenbergarewithoutinformationorknowledgesufTcienttoformabeliefastothetruthofanyallegationsconcerningGlobalLinksconductactivitiesorbusinesswithMOLduringtheperiodoftimefromJune82006throughthepresentwhenCJRwasnotanownerofandRosenbergwasnotanofficerordirectorofGlobalLinkLThepurposeandresultofGlobalLinksfalsebookingpracticewastoobtainshippingservicesfromoceancarriersincludingMOLatratesbetterthantherateswhichGlobalLinkwasotherwiserequiredtopayGlobalLinksschemeresultedin12

MOLbeingunderpaidbyhundredsofdollarspercontainerforthousandsofcontainerscausingMOLtosufferdamagesofnolessthan45millionANSWERCJRandRosenbergdenytheallegationscontainedinparagraphIVLMInAugustof2008MOLreceivedasubpoenafromGlobalLinkseekingtestimonyaboutthesplitroutingpracticesinconnectionwithGlobalLinksarbitrationwithOlympusPartnersOEFOGFMischiantiCardenasHeffernanCJRRosenbergandothersAtthattimeMOLspokewithcounselforGlobalLinkaboutthepracticesandMOLadvisedGlobalLinkthatifsuchpracticesoccurredtheywouldhavebeenatMOLsexpenseMOLaccordinglyrequestedafullaccountingoftheamountsthatwereimproperlybilledandrecoveryofsameGlobalLinkhasnotprovidedsuchanaccountingandhasnotcompensatedMOLforitsdamagesANSWERCJRandRosenbergarewithoutknowledgeorinformationsufficienttoformabeliefastothetruthoftheallegationscontainedinpazagraphPJMoftheComplaintandthereforedenythesameVViolationsoftheShiaainaActof1984AAsdescribedinPartIVabovetheRespondentsengagedinawillfulanddeliberatefraudulentschemetoobtainoceantransportationforpropertyforlessthantheratesandorchargesthatwouldotherwiseapplyinviolationofSection10a1oftheShippingAct46USC41102aANSWERCJRandRosenbergdenytheallegationscontainedinparagraphVAoftheComplaintBTheRespondentsfraudulentactionsandwillfuleffortstoconcealinformationfromMOLinanefforttoobtainbetterratesconstitutedafailuretoestablishobserveandenforcejustandreasonableregulationsandpracticesrelatingtoorconnectedwithreceivinghandlinganddeliveringpropertyinviolationofSection10d1oftheShippingAct46USC41102cANSWERCJRandRosenbergdenytheallegationscontainedinpazagraphVBoftheComplaintCRespondentsfraudulentpracticesincludingtheprovisionoffalseinformationanddocumentstoMOLviolated46CFR51531ewhichprohibitsthemakingorprovisionoffalseorfraudulentclaimsorfalseinformation13

ANSWERCJRandRosenbergdenytheallegationscontainedinparagraphVCoftheComplaintVIIniurvtoMOLAAsadirectresultoftheviolationsofthe1984ActbytheRespondentsMOLwasunderpaidbyhundredsofdollarspercontainercausingMOLtosufferdamagesofnolessthan45millionThefullextentofdamagescanonlybedeterminedafterobtainingdiscoveryandtherebysecuringinformationaboutthecontainersdestinationsandratesinvolvedANSWERCJRandRosenbergdenytheallegationscontainedinparagraphVIAoftheComplaintVIIPraverforReliefAStatementRegardingADRProceduresAlternativedisputeresolutionprocedureswerenotusedpriortofilingthecomplaintandcomplainanthasnotconsultedwiththeCommissionDisputeResolutionSpecialistaboututilizingalternativedisputeresolutionANSWERCJRandRosenbergadmitthatMOLdidnotuseanyalternativedisputeresolutionprocedureswithrespecttotheirpurportedclaimsagainstCJRandRosenbergpriortofilingtheComplaintCJRandRosenbergarewithoutknowledgeorinformationsufficienttoformabeliefastothetruthoftheremainingallegationscontainedinparagraphVIIAoftheComplaintandthereforedenythesameBWHEREFOREMOLpraysthattheRespondentsberequiredtoanswerthechargesinthisComplaintthatafterduehearingandinvestigationanorderbemadecommandingtheRespondentstoceaseanddesistfromtheaforementionedviolationsoftheShippingActandCommissionregulationsandtoestablishandputinforcesuchpracticesastheCommissiondeterminestobelawfulandreasonablethatanorderbemadecommandingRespondentstopayMOLreparationsforviolationsoftheShippingActplusinterestcostsandattorneysfeesandanyotherdamagestobedeterminedandthatsuchotherandfurtherreliefbegrantedastheCommissiondeterminestobeproperfairandjustinthecircumstancesANSWERCJRandRosenbergdenythatMOLisentitledtoanyofthereliefsetforthinparagraphVIIBoftheComplaint14

CMOLrequestsahearingonthismatterandfurtherrequeststhatthehearingbeheldinWashingtonDCANSWERParagraphVIICoftheComplaintdoesnotrequirearesponsefromCJRandRosenbergAFFIRMATIVEDEFENSES1TheComplaintfailstostateaclaimforwhichreliefcanbegrantedinthatinallegingviolationsofSection10aoftheShippingAct46USC41102aMOLhasallegedviolationsgroundedinfraudwithparticularityandtheComplaintfailstoallegefraudwithparticularityastoRespondentsCJRandRosenbergasrequiredbyFedRCivP9bapplicablepursuantto46CFR502122TheComplaintfailstostateaclaimforwhichreliefcanbegrantedinthattheComplaintfailstoallegewithparticularityhowCJRanallegedownerofGlobalLinkduringpartoftherelevantperioddominatedandcontrolledGlobalLinkunderthetestforpiercingthecorporateveilasrequiredbyFedRCivP9bwhenfraudisanecessaryelementoftheallegedviolations3TheComplaintfailstostateaclaimforwhichreliefcanbegrantedinthattheComplaintfailstoallegewithparticularityhowRosenbergduringtherelevantperioddominatedandcontrolledGlobalLinkunderthetestforpiercingthecorporateveilasrequiredbyFedRCivP9bwhenfraudisanecessaryelementoftheallegedviolations4SplitroutingorreroutingisacommonpracticeintheNVOCCindustryandisnotaviolationofSection10a1oftheShippingAct46USC41102aasalleged5TotheextentthattheAdministrativeLawJudgefindsthatanyallegedconductbyCJRRosenbergortheotherRespondentswouldconstituteaviolationofSection10a1oftheShippingAct46USC41102atheComplaintisbarredbyillegalityinthatMOLsknowledgeofparticipationinandencouragementofsaidconductwouldconstituteaviolationofSections1061and2AoftheShippingAct46USC411041and2AandalsowouldconstituteanunjustandunreasonablepracticeinviolationofSection10d1oftheShippingAct46USC41102c6TheComplaintisbarredbyillegalityinthatMOLsfailuretohavesuitabletariffratesonfileforGlobalLinksshipmentsconstitutesanunfairandunjustdiscriminatorypracticeinviolationofSection1064oftheShippingAct46USC411044andanundueandunreasonableprejudiceordisadvantageinviolationofSection1068oftheShippingAct48USC41104815

7TheComplaintisbarredbecauseMOLhassufferednodamagesasaresultofanyconductallegedagainstCJRRosenbergortheotherRespondentsandsuchclaimsazeinviolationofSection10d1oftheShippingAct46USC41102c8TheComplaintisbarredbytheapplicablestatuteoflimitationandorthedoctrineoflathes9TheComplaintisbarredbyestoppelandorwaiverinthatMOLknowinglyparticipatedinapprovedoffailedtoobjecttoandencouragedthepracticeofreroutingatGlobalLink10TheComplaintisbarredbyMOLsuncleanhandsandorthedoctrineofirrparidelictointhatMOLknowinglyparticipatedinapprovedoffailedtoobjecttoandencouragedthepracticeofreroutingatGlobalLink11CJRandRosenbergreservetherighttoadoptandrelyuponanyaffirmativedefensesandmattersofavoidancewhichmaybeassertedbyotherRespondentsinthismatter12CJRandRosenbergalsoreservetherighttoassertandrelyuponanyadditionalaffirmativedefensesandmattersofavoidanceasmaybedisclosedduringthecourseofadditicnalinvestigationanddiscoveryAhearingisherebyrequestedinWashingtonDCtoadduceevidencefromwitnessesasmaybecomeapparentduringdiscoveryRespectfullysubmittedByCarlosRodriguezEsqZhengXieEsqRODRIGUEZODONNELGONZALEZWILLIAMS1250ConnecticutAveNWSuite200WashingtonDC200362029732999Telephone2022933307FacsimileBenjaminIFinkEsqNealFWeinrichEsqBERMANFINKVANHORNPC3423PiedmontRdNESuite20016

AtlantaGeorgia303054042617711Telephone4042331943FacsimileAttorneysforRespondentsCJRWORLDENTERPRISESINCandCHADJROSENBERGDatedinWashingtonDCthisninthdayofJuly201017

VERIFICATIONRespondentChadRosenbergdeclazesandstatesthatheisthePresidentofRespondentCJRWorldEnterprisesIncinthisproceedingandthattheforegoingVerifiedAnsweraretruetothebestofhisinformationandbeliefandthatthegroundsofhisbeliefastoallmattersnotuponhisownpersonalknowledgeisinformationwhichhasotherwisebeenprovidedtoRespondentsChadRosenbergandCJRWorldEnterprisesIncIdeclazeandstateunderpenaltyofperjurythattheforegoingistrueandcorrectExecutedonJulyQ2010StateofCountyofKohSSCbeingfastdulyswornonoathdeposesandsaysthatheisthePresidentofCJRWorldEnterprisesIncandisthepersonwhosignedtheforegoingverificationthathehasreadtheVerifiedAnswerandthatthefactsstatedthereinuponhisowninformationanduponinformationreceivedfromothersafliantbelievestobetrueSubscribedandsworntobeforemeanotarypublicinandfortheStateofountyofthisdayyjeaAD2010PQNotaryPublicyloFueecMyCommissionExpires2I1Gsrliliiee

CERTIFICATEOFSERVICEIherebycertifythatIhavethisdayservedtheforegoingdocumentuponthefollowingindividualssviaamailandfirstclassmailpostageprepaidMarcJFinkAnneEMickeyHeatherMSpringSherBlackwellLLP1850MStreetNWSuite900WashingtonDC20036AttorneysforMitsuiOSKLinesLtdDavidPStreetBrendanCollinsGKGLawPC105431stStreetNWSuite200WashingtonDC20007AttorneysforGlobalLinkLogisticsIncWarrenLDeanJrRobertAShaprioSeanMcGowanRyanKManagerThompsonCoburnLLP1909KStreetNWSuite600WashingtonDC20006AttorneysforOlympusPartnersLPOlympusGrowthFundIIILPOlympusExecutiveFundLPLouisJMischiantiDavidCardenasKeithHeffernanZhengXieEsqRODRIGUEZODONNELGONZALEZWILLIAMSPC1250ConnecticutAveNWSuite200WashingtonDC200362029732981Telephone2022933307FacsimileAttorneysforRespondentsCJRWORLDENTERPRISESINCandCHADJROSENBERGDatedinWashingtonDCthisninthdayofJuly2010