rnao.owl colin batchelor royal society of chemistry, uk 2009-01-05
Post on 20-Dec-2015
216 views
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: RnaO.owl Colin Batchelor Royal Society of Chemistry, UK 2009-01-05](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d415503460f94a1c7cb/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
RnaO.owl
Colin Batchelor
Royal Society of Chemistry, UK
2009-01-05
![Page 2: RnaO.owl Colin Batchelor Royal Society of Chemistry, UK 2009-01-05](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d415503460f94a1c7cb/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Outline
• RnaO and OBO
• RnaO and BFO
• Simple use cases for the ontology
• Relations for RnaO
• How far can we go?
![Page 3: RnaO.owl Colin Batchelor Royal Society of Chemistry, UK 2009-01-05](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d415503460f94a1c7cb/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
RnaO and OBO
Commitment to common upper ontology (BFO)
Commitment to dividing responsibilities between ontologies:
• ChEBI for molecular parts (and relations?)• SO for sequences• GO for RNA function
Leaving RnaO to concentrate on RNA…
![Page 4: RnaO.owl Colin Batchelor Royal Society of Chemistry, UK 2009-01-05](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d415503460f94a1c7cb/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Basic Formal Ontology (1)http://www.ifomis.org/bfo
Object:• “An independent continuant that is spatially
extended, maximally self-connected and self-contained (the parts of a substance are not separated from each other by spatial gaps) and possesses an internal unity. The identity of substantial object entities is independent of that of other entities and can be maintained through time.”
![Page 5: RnaO.owl Colin Batchelor Royal Society of Chemistry, UK 2009-01-05](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d415503460f94a1c7cb/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Basic Formal Ontology (2)http://www.ifomis.org/bfo
Fiat Object Part:
• “An independent continuant that is part of an object but is not demarcated by any physical discontinuities.”
![Page 6: RnaO.owl Colin Batchelor Royal Society of Chemistry, UK 2009-01-05](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d415503460f94a1c7cb/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Basic Formal Ontology (3)http://www.ifomis.org/bfo
Site:• “An independent continuant consisting of a
characteristic spatial shape in relation to some arrangement of other continuant entities and of the medium which is enclosed in whole or in part by this characteristic spatial shape. Site entities are entities that can be occupied by other continuant entities.”
![Page 7: RnaO.owl Colin Batchelor Royal Society of Chemistry, UK 2009-01-05](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d415503460f94a1c7cb/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
RNA and BFOhttp://www.ifomis.org/bfo
Objects:• RNA moleculesFiat Object Parts:• Nucleotides, ribose rings, phosphate
groups, nucleobases, nucleosidesSites:• Backbone segments and their
conformers
![Page 8: RnaO.owl Colin Batchelor Royal Society of Chemistry, UK 2009-01-05](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d415503460f94a1c7cb/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Simple use cases
• Classify base pairs according to the Leontis-Westhof scheme (easy)
• Identify motifs in 3d structures (hard)
• (Vaguer, but really the most important) Provide bridge between different representations
![Page 9: RnaO.owl Colin Batchelor Royal Society of Chemistry, UK 2009-01-05](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d415503460f94a1c7cb/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
![Page 10: RnaO.owl Colin Batchelor Royal Society of Chemistry, UK 2009-01-05](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d415503460f94a1c7cb/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Relations for RnaO (1)
Base pairing:
• pairsWith, pairsWithWW, pairsWithCWW
Backbone bonding:
• fivePrimeTo, threePrimeTo, etc.
![Page 11: RnaO.owl Colin Batchelor Royal Society of Chemistry, UK 2009-01-05](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d415503460f94a1c7cb/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Relations for RnaO (2)
Then:
Family1BasePair = hasPart some Nucleobase and (pairsWithCWW some Nucleobase)
(this works and classifies base pairings satisfactorily within the LW scheme)
![Page 12: RnaO.owl Colin Batchelor Royal Society of Chemistry, UK 2009-01-05](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d415503460f94a1c7cb/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Relations for RnaO (3)
And:
GNRA TetraloopMotif = hasPart some ( Nucleobase and fivePrimeTo some (G and fivePrimeTo some (Nucleobase and fivePrimeTo some (Nucleobase and fivePrimeTo some (A and fivePrimeTo some (Nucleobase and pairsWithCWW some Nucleobase) and pairsWithTHS some G))) and pairsWithTSH some A) and pairsWithCWW some
Nucleobase)
This is underdetermined and will find false positives. But how many?
![Page 13: RnaO.owl Colin Batchelor Royal Society of Chemistry, UK 2009-01-05](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d415503460f94a1c7cb/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
How far can we go?
• We have a rudimentary ontology with many of the classes we will need for the full ontology.
• We have an alignment with BFO.
• We have a test case where reasoning works.• But… we also have an appreciation of the
limitations of OWL.