risk management project survey’s preliminary results face to face meeting mcofe warsaw 28 may 2015...
TRANSCRIPT
Risk Management ProjectSurvey’s preliminary results
Face to face meeting MCOFE
Warsaw 28 May 2015
Fabrizio Rotundi
Page 2
Nov ‘14 Dec ‘14
Mar ‘15
May ‘15
Sep ‘15
ANALYSIS DESIGN
QUALITY & REPLICATION
CRITERIA SETTING
RISK MANAGEMENT PRACTICE SURVEY
DATA ANALYSIS & COMPARISON
« BEST PRACTICE » PROCESSING
GUIDELINES MAKE UP
Template
Framework
Survey output
Benchmark analysis
Best practice
Guidelines
DEADLINE STEPS OUTPUTS
QU
ALIT
YR
EP
LIC
AB
ILIT
YA
NA
LYS
IS
Nov ‘15
Road map proposal for developing Risk Management among NSIs
Page 3
Reading-key Criteria
Project’s subdivisions and links between output’s variables
3 READING-KEY CRITERIA
To analyse the experiences
2 PARAMETERS To elaborate the questionnaire
SEVERAL FACTORS describing each parameter To set the questions
Page 4
Track 1 - Defining the Template’s Reading-Key Criteria
The Reading-Key Criteria are the lens to analyze the experiences through
2. The “Uncertainty experts” dimension refers to the actors, roles, organizational units or
structures to which the organization assigns the responsibility to conceptualize and
control uncertainty and, consequently, the responsibility for Risk Management.
3. The “Technologies” dimension reveals the extent to which the Risk Management
System becomes embedded or decupled in the organization and refers to the practices,
procedures and tools adopted by an organization to implement Risk Management.
1. The “Risk rationalities” dimension
reflects the main purpose which any
organization grounds its own risk
strategy on (i.e. compliance,
performance, company value, etc.).
The Template
Page 5
Track 2 – Describing the Parameters which guide the Questionnaire
a) Level of effectiveness in context analysis and of consistency with identified risks
b) Cost planning levelc) Level of consistency with the statistics
production Quality modeld) Thoroughness level in implementing a
Risk Management practicee) Etc. etc.
Qualitya) Accordance level with international
standardsb) Financial sustainabilityc) Detection of key steps resulting from
a thorough and methodical application of Risk Management
d) Etc. etc.
Replication
Questionnaire
Page 6
Integrated Common Framework
From the Model
General Overarching Processes
To the Standardized process
GSBPM 5.0
By the Tool
Risk Management System
The organisational Risk Management encourages practices based on the early planning of activities, anticipating possible obstacles in achieving objectives, instead of the logic of urgency.
Page 7
Survey’s statistical analysis
Range of responses Sect. 1 Sect. 2 Sect. 3 Sect. 4 TOTAL
100% 14,7% 0,0% 0,0% 8,8% 0,0%
75% - 99,9% 52,9% 20,6% 2,9% 38,2% 29,4%
50% - 74,9% 0,0% 35,3% 35,3% 20,6% 38,2%
25% - 49,9% 0,0% 11,8% 29,4% 0,0% 0,0%
0,1% - 24,9% 32,4% 0,0% 2,9% 0,0% 32,4%
0% - 0,09% 0,0% 32,4% 29,4% 32,4% 0,0%
TOTAL 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
Involved Institutes and Organizations 64
Respondents 34
Overall Redemption 53,1%
Anonymous 5
Double responses 2
Total of valid responses 29
Redemption of valid responses 45,3%
Countries recognizable 27
Redemption of countries recognizable 42,2%
Page 8
Survey’s statistical analysis
Page 9
Survey’s statistical analysis
Page 10
Survey’s statistical analysis
Page 11
Survey’s statistical analysis
Page 12
Survey’s statistical analysis
Page 13
Survey’s statistical analysis
Page 14
Strategy
Page 15
Experiences
Page 16
Governance
Page 17
Impacts on organization
Page 18
Communication
Page 19
Functions and Accountabilities
Page 20
Stakeholders Involvement
Page 21
Treatment and monitoring
Page 22
Internal Environment
Page 23
Growth and training
Page 24
Mapping Organization
Page 25
Resources
Page 26
Example of conceptual map: Rationalities
Page 27
Example of conceptual map: Uncertainty Experts
Page 28
Example of conceptual map: Technologies
Page 29
The expected outcomes
1. Building and sharing questionnaire (2nd half of February)
2. Survey (8th of April)
3. Collecting data (15th of May)
4. Data Analysis & Report processing (end of June 2015)
5. Program implementation case studies (max 3) analysis (July-Sept)
6. Development of guidelines (September)
7. Sharing of Guidelines final draft (End of October)
Page 30
Thank you for your attention !!!
Fabrizio ROTUNDI
Alessandro HINNA