risk assessment hazard no. 1€¦ · risk assessment hazard no. the warehouse (glos) ltd....

34
Risk Assessment Hazard No. The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd. Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due Jeremy Chapman General Manager 7 th January 2017 6 th January 2018 1 Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed Master No. Reassessment Workplace Regulations. 1992 Entrance and steps in the building Hazard Description Slip and trip Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups Trip Fall All persons entering and leaving premises Risk Assessment (without control measures) Frequency 5 Constant Severity 3 Marginal Likelihood 3 Possible Initial Risk Rating 9 Medium Existing Controls Entrance and steps are soundly constructed and properly maintained. Entrance and steps are kept clear of obstructions, objects and spillages. Entrance and steps are swept daily of dirt and refuse and thoroughly cleansed at least weekly. A secure and substantial handrail is provided and maintained at least one side on every staircase. Emergency lighting is provided for all staircases Further Controls Deadline Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account) Frequency 5 Constant Severity 3 Marginal Likelihood 2Unlikely Residual Risk Rating 6 Medium priority action Notes

Upload: others

Post on 23-Apr-2020

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Risk Assessment Hazard No.

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman

General Manager

7th January 2017

6th January 2018

1

Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed Master No.

Reassessment Workplace Regulations. 1992

Entrance and steps in the building

Hazard Description Slip and trip

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups Trip Fall

All persons entering and leaving premises

Risk Assessment (without control measures) Frequency 5 – Constant

Severity 3 – Marginal

Likelihood 3 – Possible

Initial Risk Rating 9 – Medium

Existing Controls Entrance and steps are soundly constructed and properly maintained. Entrance and steps are kept clear of obstructions, objects and spillages. Entrance and steps are swept daily of dirt and refuse and thoroughly cleansed at least weekly. A secure and substantial handrail is provided and maintained at least one side on every staircase. Emergency lighting is provided for all staircases

Further Controls Deadline

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account) Frequency 5 – Constant

Severity 3 – Marginal

Likelihood 2– Unlikely

Residual Risk Rating 6 – Medium priority action

Notes

Risk Assessment Hazard No.

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman

General Manager

7th January 2017

6th January 2018

2

Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed Master No.

Reassessment Workplace Regulations. 1992

Condition of Floors and traffic routes Hard surface

Hazard Description Slip and trip

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups Trip Fall

All persons on site

Risk Assessment (without control measures) Frequency 5 – Constant

Severity 2 – Marginal

Likelihood 3 – Probable

Initial Risk Rating 6 – Medium

Existing Controls Floors and walkways are soundly constructed and properly maintained. Floors and walkways are kept clear of obstructions, objects and spillages. Wet areas are suitably drained Yellow Signs are used when cleaning to warn people. Floors and walkways are swept daily of dirt and refuse and thoroughly cleansed at least weekly. No unprotected cables trail across floor Gangways and other areas used for evacuation or fire point access are clearly marked

Further Controls Deadline

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account) Frequency 5 – Constant

Severity 1 – Negligible

Likelihood 2– Unlikely

Residual Risk Rating 2 – Low priority action

Notes

Risk Assessment Hazard No.

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman

General Manager

7th January 2017

6th January 2018

3

Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed Master No.

Reassessment Workplace Regulations. 1992

Condition of Floors Carpets and mats

Hazard Description Slip and trip

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups Trip Fall

All persons on site

Risk Assessment (without control measures) Frequency 5 – Constant

Severity 3 – Marginal

Likelihood 3 – Probable

Initial Risk Rating 6 – Medium

Existing Controls Floors and walkways are soundly constructed and properly maintained. Floors and walkways are kept clear of obstructions, objects and spillages. Floors and walkways are cleared of refuse daily and thoroughly cleansed at least weekly. Carpets and mats are maintained in good condition, securely fixed and do not have curling edges. No unprotected cables trail across floor. Regular floor walks of the building are carried out to check for dangers.

Further Controls Deadline

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account) Frequency 5 – Constant

Severity 1 – Minor

Likelihood 2– Unlikely

Residual Risk Rating 2 – Low priority action

Notes

Risk Assessment Hazard No.

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman

General Manager

7th January 2017

6th January 2018

4

Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed Master No.

Reassessment Workplace Regulations. 1992

Temperature

Hazard Description Extremes of temperature

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups Hypothermia Excessive heat

All people on site

Risk Assessment (without control measures) Frequency 5 – Constant

Severity 4 – Serious

Likelihood 1 – Almost Impossible

Initial Risk Rating 4 – Low priority action

Existing Controls Heating is provided to maintain a reasonable temperature Doors and windows are kept closed whenever possible Cooling can be achieved by opening windows and roof vents Water is available free to the public in the bar Employees have access to refreshments at all times. Mechanical fans are provided to achieve increased air movement. Air conditioning available on level 3

Further Controls Deadline New Air conditioning planned for the main bouldering floor due to be completed in early 2017. New Air conditioning fitted to The Cave in December 2016

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account) Frequency 5 – Constant

Severity 1 – Negligible

Likelihood 1– Almost impossible

Residual Risk Rating 1 – No further action

Notes

Risk Assessment Hazard No.

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman

General Manager

7th January 2017

6th January 2018

5

Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed Master No.

Reassessment Workplace Regulations. 1992

Lighting

Hazard Description Inability to move about safely

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups Contact with hard object Trip and fall

All employees and public

Risk Assessment (without control measures) Frequency 5 – Constant

Severity 2 – Minor

Likelihood 4 – Probable

Initial Risk Rating 8 – Medium priority action

Existing Controls Suitable and sufficient lighting is provided throughout the premises. Where natural light is used, windows and skylights are cleaned Where artificial light is used lights are repaired, cleaned or replaced as necessary. Where emergency lighting is necessary for reasons of safety it is powered by a separate energy source. Emergency lighting is tested on full test yearly and monthly visual checks.

Further Controls Deadline EAP (emergency Action plan) in place

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account) Frequency 5 – Constant

Severity 1 – Negligible

Likelihood 1– Almost impossible

Residual Risk Rating 1 – No further action

Notes

Risk Assessment Hazard No.

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman

General Manager

7th January 2017

6th January 2018

6

Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed Master No.

Reassessment Workplace Regulations. 1992

Cleanliness and waste materials

Hazard Description Accumulation of waste materials

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups Trip and fall Pest infestations

All employees and public

Risk Assessment (without control measures) Frequency 5 – Constant

Severity 2 – Minor

Likelihood 4 – Probable

Initial Risk Rating 8 – Medium priority action

Existing Controls . Floors and walkways are kept clear of obstructions, objects and spillages. Floors and walkways are swept daily of dirt and refuse and thoroughly cleansed at least weekly. Interior walls, ceilings and work surfaces are cleaned at suitable intervals. Surface treatments are renewed when they can no longer be kept clean. Cleaning is carried out by an effective and suitable method that does not expose anyone to a health and safety risk. Action pest control are contracted to control pests

Further Controls Deadline

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account) Frequency 5 – Constant

Severity 2 – Minor

Likelihood 2– Unlikely

Residual Risk Rating 4 – Low priority action

Notes

Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed Master No.

Risk Assessment Hazard No.

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman

General Manager

7th January 2017

6th January 2018

7

Reassessment Workplace Regulations. 1992

Workstations and seating

Hazard Description Difficult movement, stooping, cramped conditions, repetitive movement

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups Musculoskeletal

Persons at workstations

Risk Assessment (without control measures) Frequency 5 – Constant

Severity 4 – Serious

Likelihood 2 – Unlikely

Initial Risk Rating 8 – Medium Priority Action

Existing Controls Administration and Management have offices with correct office chairs and space. Any requests for better controls are reviewed as requested. Reception provided with a raised seat for periods of inputting data

Further Controls Deadline

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account) Frequency 5 – Constant

Severity 3 – Serious

Likelihood 1– Unlikely

Residual Risk Rating 3 – Medium priority action

Notes

Risk Assessment Hazard No.

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman

General Manager

7th January 2017

6th January 2018

8

Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed Master No.

Reassessment Workplace Regulations. 1992

Windows Fall

Hazard Description Fall from height

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups Contact with hard surface

All persons on premises

Risk Assessment (without control measures) Frequency 5 – Constant

Severity 3 – Marginal

Likelihood 3 – Possible

Initial Risk Rating 9 – Medium

Existing Controls All openable windows, skylights and ventilators can be operated safely. Openable windows operate in a manner which will not expose any other person in the workplace to danger. All windows can be cleaned in a safe manner. Metal Safety bars fitted to low level windows in the bouldering room

Further Controls Deadline

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account) Frequency 5 – Constant

Severity 3 – Marginal

Likelihood 2– Unlikely

Residual Risk Rating 6 – Medium priority action

Notes

Risk Assessment Hazard No.

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman

General Manager

7th January 2017

6th January 2018

9

Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed Master No.

Reassessment Workplace Regulations. 1992

Sanitary conveniences

Hazard Description Lack of availability and/or unsanitary conditions

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups Stress Infection

All persons

Risk Assessment (without control measures) Frequency 5 – Constant

Severity 3 – Marginal

Likelihood 4 – Probable

Initial Risk Rating 12 – High priority action

Existing Controls Rooms containing sanitary conveniences are adequately ventilated and lit The facilities and the rooms containing them are kept in clean and orderly condition Separate rooms are provided for men and women, except where and so far as each convenience is in a separate room the door of which is capable of being secured from the inside Water closets are connected to a suitable drainage system and are provided with an effective means for flushing with water Toilet paper and coat hooks are provided For water closets used by women suitable means for the disposal of sanitary dressings is provided. Sufficient numbers of facilities are provided for the maximum number of people likely to be in the workplace The introduction of a nappy bin in the disabled toilets in the cafebar due to the mini mice toddler group service.

Further Controls Deadline

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account) Frequency 5 – Constant

Severity 3 – Marginal

Likelihood 1– Almost impossible

Residual Risk Rating 3 – Low priority action

Notes Sanitary conveniences are set on a contract and therefore maintained on a two week basis.

Risk Assessment Hazard No.

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman

General Manager

7th January 2017

6th January 2018

10

Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed Master No.

Reassessment Workplace Regulations. 1992

Washing facilities

Hazard Description Contamination of the skin by harmful or offensive materials

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups Infection

All persons

Risk Assessment (without control measures) Frequency 5 – Constant

Severity 3 – Marginal

Likelihood 3 – Probable

Initial Risk Rating 9 Medium action

Existing Controls Rooms containing washing facilities are adequately ventilated and lit The facilities and the rooms containing them are kept in clean and orderly condition Separate rooms are provided for men and women, except where and so far as each convenience is in a separate room the door of which is capable of being secured from the inside Washing facilities include a supply of clean hot and cold, or warm running water, soap, towels or other drying means The facilities are arranged to ensure adequate privacy for the user Sufficient numbers of facilities are provided for the maximum number of people likely to be in the workplace

Further Controls Deadline

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account) Frequency 5 – Constant

Severity 3 – Marginal

Likelihood 1– Almost Impossible

Residual Risk Rating 3 – Low priority action

Notes Washing facilities are cleaned daily

Risk Assessment Hazard No.

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman

General Manager

7th January 2017

6th January 2018

11

Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed Master No.

Reassessment Workplace Regulations. 1992

Drinking water

Hazard Description Contaminated water

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups Gastric Infection

All persons

Risk Assessment (without control measures) Frequency 5 – Constant

Severity 2 – Minor

Likelihood 4 – Probable

Initial Risk Rating 8 – High priority action

Existing Controls Drinking water is obtained from a public supply by means of a tap connected directly to the water main or a cistern that complies with the requirements of the UK Water Bye-Laws Drinking water taps are installed in sanitary conditions Cups or beakers are provided. Drinking water supplies are marked as such if people may otherwise drink from supplies that are not meant for drinking.

Further Controls Deadline

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account) Frequency 5 – Constant

Severity 1 – Negligible

Likelihood 1– Almost Impossible

Residual Risk Rating 1 – No further action

Notes

Risk Assessment Hazard No.

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman

General Manager

7th January 2017

6th January 2018

12

Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed Master No.

Reassessment Noise at Work Regulations 1989

Noise

Hazard Description High noise levels

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups Hearing Damage

All Employees Neighbours (Nuisance)

Risk Assessment (without control measures) Frequency 5 – Constant

Severity 4– Serious

Likelihood 4 – Probable

Initial Risk Rating 16 – High priority action

Existing Controls Daily personal noise exposure is kept below the first action level of 85dB(A) Ipod docks on party rooms are restricted to a set level so cannot harm. Music level is monitored by staff on floorwalking duties

Further Controls Deadline

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account) Frequency 5 – Constant

Severity 2 – Minor

Likelihood 2– Unlikely

Residual Risk Rating 4 – Low priority action

Notes

Risk Assessment Hazard No.

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman

General Manager

7th January 2017

6th January 2018

13

Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed Master No.

Reassessment Workplace Regulations 1992

Stress Organisational

Hazard Description Being unable to cope with sustained or continual challenges such as, trying to meet unrealistic time pressures or working in a hostile environment.

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups Distress/Exhaustion/Breakdown

All employees

Risk Assessment (without control measures) Frequency 5 - Constant

Severity 4 – Serious

Likelihood 3 – Possible

Initial Risk Rating 12 – High priority action

Existing Controls The company creates a climate in which employees have the confidence to seek assistance and discuss their work-related problems. Policies covering discrimination, aggression, bullying and harassment are in place. Possible work-related stressors are identified and monitored by managers. Work related environmental, organisational and people stressors are reduced as far as reasonably practicable. Where appropriate, training will be provided in communication, time management and handling difficult situations. Employees experiencing work-related stress are treated the same as those with any other occupationally induced health problem. Appropriate support is provided for distressed employees. Adequate rehabilitation is ensured for employees returning to work.

Further Controls Deadline

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account) Frequency 5 - Constantly

Severity 4 – Serious

Likelihood 1– Almost Impossible

Residual Risk Rating 4 – Low priority action

Notes The Warehouse has clear policies covering discrimination, aggression, bullying and harassment.

Risk Assessment Hazard No.

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman

General Manager

7th January 2017

6th January 2018

14

Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed Master No.

Reassessment Electricity at Work Regulations

Electricity

Hazard Description Electric shock due to faulty electrical system or equipment

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups Electric shock

All Employees

Risk Assessment (without control measures) Frequency 5 – Constant

Severity 4– Serious

Likelihood 4 – Probable

Initial Risk Rating 16 – High priority action

Existing Controls New installations and modifications to existing system are undertaken by a competent electrician in accordance with the IEEW Regulations. A completion certificate is routinely obtained. The electrical system is examined by a competent electrician every 5 years. An inspection certificate is routinely obtained. Regular inspection is undertaken of electrical equipment. Particularly equipment that is subject to vibration or corrosion, isolator boxes, socket outlets, plugs, flexible conduits and cables. Annual inspection of portable and transferable electrical equipment is undertaken Inspection and testing are routinely undertaken whenever there is reason to suspect equipment may be defective, after any repair or modification, in accordance with the manner and frequency of use and environment.

Further Controls Deadline .

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account) Frequency 5 – Constant

Severity 3 – Marginal

Likelihood 2– Unlikely

Residual Risk Rating 6 – Medium priority action

Notes

Risk Assessment Hazard No.

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman

General Manager

7th January 2017

6th January 2018

15

Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed Master No.

Reassessment Electricity at Work Regulations

Extension cables

Hazard Description Electric shock due to fault or damaging cable.

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups Electric shock

All Employees

Risk Assessment (without control measures) Frequency 5 – Constant

Severity 4– Serious

Likelihood 4 – Probable

Initial Risk Rating 16 – High priority action

Existing Controls Extension cables are only used on a temporary basis Cables are situated to avoid physical damage or hot surfaces Pat testing takes place yearly

Further Controls Deadline Extension cables need to be checked quarterly

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account) Frequency 5 – Constant

Severity 3 – Marginal

Likelihood 2– Unlikely

Residual Risk Rating 6 – Medium priority action

Notes

Risk Assessment Hazard No.

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman

General Manager

7th January 2017

6th January 2018

16

Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed Master No.

Reassessment Electricity at Work Regulations

Multi-adapter sockets

Hazard Description Fire from electrical overload

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups Burns

All Employees

Risk Assessment (without control measures) Frequency 5 – Constant

Severity 4– Serious

Likelihood 3 – Possible

Initial Risk Rating 12 – High priority action

Existing Controls Amperage of appliances is kept below safe operating level of adapter. Visual inspection of the sheath, plug casings and pins for damage or discolouration NO LONGER IN USE AT THE WAREHOUSE 2017 REVIEW JC ONLY EXTENSION CABLES IN USE.

Further Controls Deadline NO LONGER TO BE USED UNLESS FOR SHORT PERIODS AGREED BY THE GM

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account) Frequency 5 – Constant

Severity 2 – Minor

Likelihood 1– Unlikely

Residual Risk Rating 2 – Low priority action

Notes

Risk Assessment Hazard No.

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman

General Manager

7th January 2017

6th January 2018

17

Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed Master No.

Reassessment Pressure Systems and Transportable Gas Containers Regulations 1989/COSHH 1994

Compressed Gas Cylinders

Hazard Description Explosion and fire

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups Violent contact with hard surface Shock Fire

Persons in vicinity of discharge

Risk Assessment (without control measures) Frequency 5 – Constant

Severity 4 – Serious

Likelihood 4 – Probable

Initial Risk Rating 16 – High priority action

Existing Controls - CO2 and Mixed Gas used for beer and soft drinks is stored in the bar area and when in use is connected

through a pressure valve that is maintained annually - Only staff trained in the beer cellar duites can change a cylinder.

Further Controls Deadline Beer Gas no longer on site, reduced risk as less gas supply on site

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account) Frequency 5 – Constant

Severity 4 – Serious

Likelihood 2– Unlikely

Residual Risk Rating 8 – Medium priority action

Notes

Risk Assessment Hazard No.

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman

General Manager

7th January 2017

6th January 2018

18

Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed Master No.

Reassessment Provision and Use of Work Equipment

Steps & Ladders

Hazard Description Fall from height

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups Fracture/break/Incision wound

Users Passers by

Risk Assessment (without control measures) Frequency 2 - Monthly

Severity 4 – Serious

Likelihood 3 – Possible

Initial Risk Rating 12 – High priority action

Existing Controls An assessment is made to determine if the task can be undertaken safely with the steps or ladders available. A mobile tower or scaffolding is provided if steps or ladders are unsuitable. Steps and ladders meet the requirements of the British or European standards. Steps and ladders are long enough for the purposes for which they are required. Ladders are maintained in sound condition. Ladders are recorded in a register ( Papertrail ) and their condition is regularly checked.

Further Controls Deadline

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account) Frequency 2 - Monthly

Severity 4 – Serious

Likelihood 2 – Unlikely

Residual Risk Rating –8 Medium priority action

Notes

Risk Assessment Hazard No.

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman

General Manager

7th January 2017

6th January 2018

19

Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed Master No.

Reassessment Provision and Use of Work Equipment

Company Vehicles

Hazard Description Road accident as a result of unsafe vehicle or driver

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups Crush Injury

Company Vehicle Drivers

Risk Assessment (without control measures) Frequency 4 – Daily

Severity 4 – Serious

Likelihood 4 – Probable

Initial Risk Rating 16 – High priority action

Existing Controls The vehicle is serviced in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations. The vehicle is maintained to meet the requirements of transport legislation. The driver holds a suitable driving licence. The driver is not required or permitted to use a mobile phone while driving without a hands free kit The driver is not required to drive excessive distances at the end of a long tiring day.

Further Controls Deadline

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account) Frequency 4 – Daily

Severity 4 – Serious

Likelihood 2– Unlikely

Residual Risk Rating 8 – Medium priority action

Notes

Risk Assessment Hazard No.

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman

General Manager

7th January 2017

6th January 2018

20

Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed Master No.

Reassessment Workplace Regulations 1992

Lone Working Securing Premises

Hazard Description Serious injury prevents lone worker summoning help. Security of a lone person

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups Treatment delayed Safety relating to Security

Last person leaving premises

Risk Assessment (without control measures) Frequency 4 – Daily

Severity 3 – Marginal

Likelihood 2 – Unlikely

Initial Risk Rating 6 – Medium priority action

Existing Controls Means of access and/or egress are kept clear. Responsible Person is physically fit. Responsible Person is fully trained in safe lock-up procedures and what to do if something goes wrong. Responsible Person has access to first aid supplies. On closing down the premises the Responsible person leaves at the same time as the Bar person so two members of staff are on the premises to lock up. On reviews from recent Health and Safety in the climbing centre. It was agreed that working on the back of the wall for safety checks needs to be reported to another team member who can check on the worker from time to time.

Further Controls Deadline

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account) Frequency 1 – Rare

Severity 2 – Minor

Likelihood 1– Almost Impossible

Residual Risk Rating 2 – Low priority action

Notes No member of staff should lock up or be left in the building on their own.

Risk Assessment Hazard No.

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman

General Manager

7th January 2017

6th January 2018

21

Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed Master No.

Reassessment Management of Health & Safety at Work Regulations 1992

Young Persons (work experience included)

Hazard Description Lack of experience, potential for games and practical jokes

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups All hazards

All persons

Risk Assessment (without control measures) Frequency 5 – Constant

Severity 4 – Serious

Likelihood 4 – Probable

Initial Risk Rating 16 – High priority action

Existing Controls Young persons are only permitted to work while under constant supervision of a responsible person. Additional training and instruction are provided until the young person has demonstrated a satisfactory level of competence. In addition to the specific training needed to carry out their assigned work tasks, further training is given in respect of :- All Work experience students must attend an interview before starting worl On day one an induction will take place and the student will be introduced to the person they will shadow - the inappropriateness of running, games and practical jokes in the workplace. - the need for tidiness, the hazards and precautions associated with chemicals, electricity and lifting/carrying. - the rules in respect of smoking, accident reporting and the arrangements for first aid.

Further Controls Deadline

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account) Frequency 5 - Constant

Severity 4 – Serious

Likelihood 2 – Unlikely

Residual Risk Rating 8 – Medium priority action

Risk Assessment Hazard No.

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman

General Manager

7th January 2017

6th January 2018

22

Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed Master No.

Reassessment Fire (Places of Work)

Smoking Designated

Hazard Description Ignition of flammable materials by cigarette ends

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups Burns Crush

All staff

Risk Assessment (without control measures) Frequency 5 - Constantly

Severity 4 – Serious

Likelihood 3 – Possible

Initial Risk Rating 12 – High priority action

Existing Controls SMOKING IS NOT PERMITTED IN ANY AREA OF THE BUILDING. No Smoking signs are in place on the windows. E Cigarettes are seen as coming under the same strict rules as part of our company policy. Staff are asked not to smoke near the outside of the building or in uniform.

Further Controls Deadline

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account) Frequency 5 - Constant

Severity 3 – Marginal

Likelihood 1 – Unlikely

Residual Risk Rating 3– Medium priority action

Notes

Risk Assessment Hazard No.

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman

General Manager

7th January 2017

6th January 2018

23

Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed Master No.

Reassessment Fire (Places of Work)

Emergency Evacuation

Hazard Description Emergency lighting failure impedes escape

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups Burns

All staff , visitors & contractors

Risk Assessment (without control measures) Frequency

Severity 4 – Serious

Likelihood 2 – Unlikely

Initial Risk Rating 8 – Medium priority action

Existing Controls Emergency lighting is tested at Quarterly intervals These are now recorded on Papertrail. Together with replacements and repairs.

Further Controls Deadline

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account) Frequency 5 - Constantly

Severity 2 – Minor

Likelihood 1 – Almost Impossible

Residual Risk Rating 2 – No action

Notes

Risk Assessment Hazard No.

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman

General Manager

7th January 2017

6th January 2018

24

Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed Master No.

Reassessment Fire (Places of Work)

Safety of staff in event of fire

Hazard Description Malfunction of fire alarm failing to alert persons present

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups Suffocation Burns Crushing

All staff , visitors & contractors

Risk Assessment (without control measures) Frequency

Severity 4 – Serious

Likelihood 2 – Unlikely

Initial Risk Rating 8 – Medium priority action

Existing Controls Alarm is tested weekly by operation of call points Alarm panel shows fault conditions

Further Controls Deadline Test alarm at a set time each week to aid recognition Alarm is examined by a competent engineer at least once a year

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account) Frequency 5 - Constantly

Severity 2 – Minor

Likelihood 1 – Almost Impossible

Residual Risk Rating 2 – No action

Notes

Risk Assessment Hazard No.

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman

General Manager

7th January 2017

6th January 2018

25

Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed Master No.

Reassessment Fire (Places of Work)

Safety of staff in event of fire

Hazard Description Lack of training impedes escape

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups Suffocation Burns Crushing

All staff, visitors & contractors

Risk Assessment (without control measures) Frequency

Severity 4 – Serious

Likelihood 2 – Unlikely

Initial Risk Rating 8 – Medium priority action

Existing Controls Fire drills are held for the team every January and at intervals when new staff join the team. All shifts are included in drill arrangements

Further Controls Deadline

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account) Frequency 5 - Constantly

Severity 2 – Minor

Likelihood 1 – Almost Impossible

Residual Risk Rating 2 – No action

Notes

Risk Assessment Hazard No.

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman

General Manager

7th January 2017

6th January 2018

26

Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed Master No.

Reassessment Fire (Places of Work)

Safety of staff in event of fire

Hazard Description Spread of small fire

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups Suffocation Burns Crushing

All staff , visitors & contractors

Risk Assessment (without control measures) Frequency

Severity 4 – Serious

Likelihood 2 – Unlikely

Initial Risk Rating 8 – Medium priority action

Existing Controls Fire fighting equipment appropriate to the task is provided at specific locations throughout the premises The fire fighting equipment is serviced annually by a competent fire extinguisher engineer. Only staff who have been trained, to assess the risk and make the correct selection and use of the equipment available, are allowed to tackle a fire.

Further Controls Deadline

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account) Frequency 5 - Constantly

Severity 2 – Minor

Likelihood 1 – Almost Impossible

Residual Risk Rating 2 – No action

Notes

Risk Assessment Hazard No.

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman

General Manager

7th January 2017

6th January 2018

27

Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed Master No.

Reassessment Fire (Places of Work)

Escape routes

Hazard Description Blocked exit routes and fire exits

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups Suffocation Burns Crushing

All staff , visitors & contractors

Risk Assessment (without control measures) Frequency

Severity 4 – Serious

Likelihood 2 – Unlikely

Initial Risk Rating 8 – Medium priority action

Existing Controls Staff are trained to keep exit routes clear Staff are trained to keep exit doors clear of obstacles Building check daily by staff carried out.

Further Controls Deadline

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account) Frequency 5 - Constantly

Severity 2 – Minor

Likelihood 1 – Almost Impossible

Residual Risk Rating 2 – No action

Notes

Risk Assessment Hazard No.

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman

General Manager

7th January 2017

6th January 2018

28

Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed Master No.

Reassessment

Maintenance

Hazard Description Changing Flu tubes and Bulbs

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups Falling / Electric Shock

Employees

Risk Assessment (without control measures) Frequency Monthly

Severity 4 – Serious

Likelihood 3 – Possible

Initial Risk Rating 12 – High Priority action

Existing Controls Use correct Equipment Isolate Supply

Further Controls Deadline

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account) Frequency 2 – Monthly

Severity 2 – Minor

Likelihood 2 – Unlikely

Residual Risk Rating 4 – Low Priority action

Notes

Risk Assessment Hazard No.

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman

General Manager

7th January 2017

6th January 2018

29

Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed Master No.

Reassessment

Maintenance

Hazard Description Window Cleaning / Painting at heights / Working at heights

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups Falling

Employees

Risk Assessment (without control measures) Frequency Monthly

Severity 4 – Serious

Likelihood 3 – Possible

Initial Risk Rating 12 – High Priority action

Existing Controls Use correct Equipment Ladders provided

Further Controls Deadline

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account) Frequency 2 – Monthly

Severity 4 – Serious

Likelihood 1 – Unlikely

Residual Risk Rating 4– Medium Priority action

Notes

Risk Assessment Hazard No.

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman

General Manager

7th January 2017

6th January 2018

30

Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed Master No.

Reassessment

Maintenance

Hazard Description Window Cleaning / Painting at heights / Working at heights/ Route setting

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups Dropping items

Employees & Customers

Risk Assessment (without control measures) Frequency Monthly

Severity 3 – Marginal

Likelihood 4 – Probable

Initial Risk Rating 12 – High Priority action

Existing Controls Cordon off area below Safety equipment used. Helmets to be worn in the area below. Tools to be secured with back up rope. Specific bags designed to work at height used for raising Contractor used for high level windows.

Further Controls Deadline

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account) Frequency 2 – Monthly

Severity 3 – Marginal

Likelihood 2 – Unlikely

Residual Risk Rating 6 – Medium Priority action

Notes

Risk Assessment Hazard No.

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman

General Manager

7th January 2017

6th January 2018

31

Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed Master No.

Reassessment

Maintenance

Hazard Description Floor Mopping

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups Slipping Fractures / Bruises

Employees & Customers

Risk Assessment (without control measures) Frequency Daily

Severity 2 – Minor

Likelihood 4 – Probable

Initial Risk Rating 8 – Medium Priority action

Existing Controls Cordon off area Restricted to quiet /off peak hours

Further Controls Deadline

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account) Frequency 4 – Daily

Severity 2 – Minor

Likelihood 2 – Unlikely

Residual Risk Rating 4 – Low Priority action

Notes

Risk Assessment Hazard No.

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman

General Manager

7th January 2017

6th January 2018

32

Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed Master No.

Reassessment

Maintenance

Hazard Description Vacuuming

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups Trip Hazard Fractures / Bruises

Employees & Customers

Risk Assessment (without control measures) Frequency Daily

Severity 2 – Minor

Likelihood 4 – Probable

Initial Risk Rating 8 – Medium Priority action

Existing Controls Vigilant and put away after use Limited to Off peak hours

Further Controls Deadline

Risk Assessment (taking control measures into account) Frequency 4 – Daily

Severity 2 – Minor

Likelihood 2 – Unlikely

Residual Risk Rating 4 – Low Priority action

Notes

Risk Assessment Hazard No.

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman

General Manager

7th January 2017

6th January 2018

33

Reason for Assessment Area(s) Assessed Master No. Reassessment

Disabled access to The Warehouse

Hazard Description The Warehouse is an old building set on 4 floors. The access in some areas is restrictive due to the design and restrictions of the structure.

Hazard Category(ies) Risk Groups Access Access and facilties on all levels Fire evacuation procedures The Climbing Activity itself

Members of the Public with disabilities

Risk Assessment (without control measures) Frequency

Constantly

Severity

2 – Marginal

Likelihood

4 – Probable

Initial Risk Rating

8 – High Priority action

Existing Controls Entrance to the building. Access via the Cafebar allows full access to the centre A disabled toilet is available on the ground floor in the cafebar. The cafebar count has a lower level for serving From the cafebar there is a lift to all levels of the building. Level 1 where the main climbing arena is located There is one small step up onto safety matting on level 1 this can be fitted with a ramp to gain access. The corridors from the lift to the main arena are narrow. The corridors are kept clear to allow access Staff working with groups have had previous experience with groups. Full body harnesses are used to give extra support Helmets are provided for all groups and helpers Areas can be sectioned off to restrict access and keep equipment such as chairs safe while the activity takes place. Additional staff members are given to the group to assist with climbing All the staff are qualified and trained climbers All Climbing staff are trained in first aid All climbing staff are trained in rescue procedures on the walls. In the case of a fire the staff are trained to stay with the group they are teaching to assist with evacuation. Head counts, and safe evacuation is followed. Level 3 has the Digital wall which is another facility which has proved popular with groups. Access is via the lift There is plenty of room on this level. The use of the digital wall would need to be out of chairs as the matting in front of the wall would restrict movement and is unsuitable for wheelchairs. The games which can be played on the wall can develop team work and are good for warm up activities. The wall is 2 metres high so

Risk Assessment Hazard No.

The Warehouse (Glos) Ltd.

Assessor’s Name Job Title Signature Date Review Due

Jeremy Chapman

General Manager

7th January 2017

6th January 2018

34

some of the higher holds would not be accessable. Therefore the games would need to be adapted for this.

Further Controls Deadline