review forum meetings

14
AIRM Review Forum #2 Monday 12 th September 2011 Eurocontrol, Brussels Welcome by Joe Gorman, NATMIG/SINTEF, Norway CCB Chairman 1

Upload: arne

Post on 05-Feb-2016

44 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

AIRM Review Forum #2 Monday 12 th September 2011 Eurocontrol, Brussels Welcome by Joe Gorman, NATMIG/SINTEF, Norway CCB Chairman. Review Forum Meetings. Agenda. What is AIRM Governance?. * Information Model * Consolidated Logical Data Model * Supporting documents. AIRM. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Review Forum Meetings

AIRM Review Forum #2

Monday 12th September 2011Eurocontrol, Brussels

Welcome

by Joe Gorman,NATMIG/SINTEF, Norway

CCB Chairman

1

Page 2: Review Forum Meetings

Review Forum Meetings

Review Forum #1 Review Forum #2

Date 11th April 2011 12th September 2011

Number of participants

18 (attended) 54 (registered)

Focus: AIRM

• What it is, purpose • Overview of changes• Details of key parts

Focus: Governance

• Overview• Role of AIRM Review

Forum

• Brief overview• Role of AIRM Review

Forum

2

Page 3: Review Forum Meetings

Agenda

3

Page 4: Review Forum Meetings

What is AIRM Governance?

4

AIRM

Governance: Procedures todecide changes to

* Information Model* Consolidated Logical Data Model

* Supporting documents

Page 5: Review Forum Meetings

Scope of Governance

Procedures to change models Procedures to change governance Notations to express models Practical tools, storage etc. issues Technical judgments about what domain

information needs to be modelled Procedures used within domain-specific modelling

projects

5

In Scope

Page 6: Review Forum Meetings

CRs (Change Requests):core of Governance

6

Change Request (CR)A proposal to add a new model,

modify the AIRM to fulfill some perceived need ormodify governance

Change ProposalA CR that contains specific

details for exactly howto meet the need expressed

in the CR

FastTrack:true/false

Status:CR approved,

Reject,CR implemented,

…….

Page 7: Review Forum Meetings

Working in CCB Meetings

Synchronous:Face-to-face

Asynchronous:Online discussion forum

Duration < 1 day Several weeks

# Participants Probably a subset of CCB members, partially depending on which CRs to be discussed

Probably most members (since offline format does not require constant participation – easier to attend)

Scope Any CRs, but especially the controversial ones

Only CRs, with status “FastTrack” (urgent or uncontroversial)

7

Page 8: Review Forum Meetings

AIRM Review Forum: Role in Governance

8

AIRMCCBMeetings

CCBS

CCBMembers

AIRM Review Forum

CCB = Change Control BoardCCBS = Change Control Board Secretariat (from 8.1.3)

8.1.* Projects

Disseminateinformation on

Periodicreviews of

AIRM

Submit CRs on behalf of parties outside CCB

Submit CRs

Check that changes made as planned

Implement Changes

Organise and prepare inputs to

FormalDecisions

Page 9: Review Forum Meetings

Issues for “Open Floor Discussion”

9

“Open” It’s up to

you!

Questions: seek better

understanding of AIRM status and plans

Questions & Suggestions:

AIRM development approach / governance

process

Possible CRs (Change Requests):

Indicate areas where CRs may be needed

Frequency of AIRM Review Forum

meetings + date of next meeting

Page 10: Review Forum Meetings

Step 1 and Step 2 model should be separate? Level of detailing Relationship with FIXM/AIXM/WXXM and ICAO Link to services Link to SWIM Action Plan A meta-rulebook? Parallel sessions in future meetings Validation against operational requirements e.g.

by operational experts

Page 11: Review Forum Meetings

ReserveSlides

11

Page 12: Review Forum Meetings

AIRM Change Control Board (CCB):Direct Involvement in Governance

12

Page 13: Review Forum Meetings

Before submitting a CR

Check existing CRs – may already be (partially) covered by an existing CR• Possible to modify an existing CR (e.g. to add some

details)

Is the CR large/complex? Consider split into several smaller

Is it likely that the CR will have major impact on other projects? Contact them and cooperate efforts to submit a combined CR

13

Page 14: Review Forum Meetings

Decision Process

14