Resourcing Graduate Qualities Through PDP

Sharon MilnerMichaela Black

Greg Kelly14th Feb 2012

2

Outline of Discussion

• Resources developed and rationale: – UMAP, ‘PDP at a Glance’, PDP website

• Links between PDP, GA, HEAR, KIS• Examples of practice and challenges

3

‘PDP at a Glance’

4

GEL A Generic Tool for

Game Enhanced LearningMichaela BlackDave BustardMartin McKinneyAdrian MoorePeter Moffett – Placement Student

6

Background

• Research from PhD student Therese Charles “Enhanced eLearning Engagement using

Game Absorption Techniques”producing a Framework and 3 years positive results

• University funded placement for CIE to develop cost effective tool to easily implement framework

7

GOLF: Game-Orientated Learning Framework

• SIX factors contributing to effective engagement in digital games

• FUN: engagement is easier if the experience is enjoyable• SOCIAL: engagement is reinforced by the social support of others

going through the same experience• IDENTITY: engagement can be encouraged if everyone has a visible

role in the learning environment• CHALLENGE: engagement can build on human competitive drive,

enhanced by social pressure• STRUCTURE: engagement is more likely if objectives and constraints

are clear and acceptable• FEEDBACK: engagement is reinforced by making achievement

explicit and timely

8

GEL: Game Enhanced Learning Tool• Simplifies the ‘gamification’ of a module• Web based system for staff and students• Supports Group or Individual games• Basic Steps:

– Create a course– Add a module

• Upload students to module from Banner– Add a challenge to module with point allocation

• Most basic game is attendance– Record points– Students receive automatic feedback– Leaderboard creates competition

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

Student Feedback: Gauges• Each challenge will have feedback in form of a

gauge

• Students can also view their own group members

• Staff can view groups or individual students

16

COM135 Challenges

Wee

k

1.

Atte

ndan

ce

2.

Ass

ignm

ent

3.

Tuto

rial Q

uiz

4.

Con

trib

utio

n

5.

Cla

ss T

est

6.

Gro

up

Dyn

amic

s 7.

Pr

esen

tatio

ns

8.

Rev

isio

n Q

uizz

es

9.

CV

1 1000 500 200

50

2 1000 500 200 3 1000 500 500 200 4 1000 500 200 5 1000 500 200 6 500 500 7 1000 500 200

50

1200

800

1000

8 250 500 100 9 1000 500 200 10 1000 500 200 11 12

Total (19050)

8750 500 4500 1700 500 100 1200 800 1000

Dynamic Structural Elements to Challenges