resource prospector - nasa
TRANSCRIPT
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Resource Prospector(RP)
Mission Concept Overview
December 2014
Title_Design Editor SBU / NO-ITAR Pre-Decisional 12/16/2014 2
Why do we care about Space Resources?
• Mission Mass Savings
– Apollo concept can only support missions to cis-lunar space
– Apollo concept requires huge rockets and/or multiple launches of mid-
sized rockets.
– Apollo approach to exploration results in high costs per mission
– Apollo approach does not allow for long duration surface missions due
to resupply costs.
– Scaling up the Apollo approach for human missions to Mars is not
practical
• 89% of the mass of the Saturn V at liftoff was propellant!
– The ability to obtain propellant in space can reduce the initial launch
mass of an exploration mission by a factor of 5!
Schematic representation of the scale of an Earth launch system for scenarios to land
an Apollo-size mission on the Moon, assuming various refueling depots and an in-
space reusable transportation system. Note: Apollo stage height is scaled by
estimated mass reduction due to ISRU refueling
Each Apollo
mission utilized
Earth-derived
propellants (Saturn V liftoff
mass = 2,962
tons)
What if lunar lander was refueled
on the Moon’s surface?
73% of Apollo mass (2,160 tons)
Assume refueling at L1 and on
Moon: 34% of mass (1,004 tons)
Assume refueling at
LEO, L1 and on Moon:
12% of mass (355 tons)
+Reusable lander
(268 tons)
+Reusable upper
stage & lander (119
tons)
Propellant from the Moon will revolutionize our current space transportation approach
B. Blair, et. al.,
Space Resource
Roundtable VI,
November 2004
What’s the Next Step?• A source of water in space would
allow the production of hydrogen and oxygen for propellant and the establishment of fuel depots in space
• We now know from LCROSS that there is water ice at one spot on the moon.
• Comparison’s of LRO’s orbital instrument data with the LCROSS plume seem to suggest that the water ice is not evenly distributed.
• Until we know the distribution and accessibility of the water ice we don’t really know if we have a usable resource.
• A “Ground Truth” surface mission is the next logical step.
• The RESOLVE payload being developed for Resource Prospector is designed to answer these questions
Title_Design Editor SBU / NO-ITAR Pre-Decisional 12/16/2014 5
Resource Prospector Mission Requirements
Verify the existence of and characterize the constituents and
distribution of water and other volatiles in lunar polar
surface materials
– Map the distribution of hydrogen rich materials– Neutron Spectrometer, Near-IR Spectrometer
– Acquire subsurface samples from a depth of 1 m with minimal loss of volatiles – Drill /Auger Subsystem
– Heat these samples to ~500°F to drive off volatiles for analysis – OVEN Subsystem
– Determine the composition and quantity of the volatiles released– LAVA Subsystem
Hope to find and quantify H2, He, CO, CO2, CH4, H2O, N2, NH3, H2S, SO2
Survive limited exposure to HF, HCl, and Hg
Title_Design Editor SBU / NO-ITAR Pre-Decisional 12/16/2014 6
RESOLVE (Regolith & Environment Science and Oxygen and Lunar Volatile Extraction)
Sample Acquisition –Auger Drill [Provider TBD]
• Auger up to 1 m of depth
• Lifts cuttings up to surface to observation and
transfer to OVEN
• Low mass/power (<15 kg)
• Wide variation in regolith/rock/ice
characteristics for penetration and sample
collection
• Wide temperature variation from surface to
depth (300K to <100K)
Resource Localization –Neutron Spectrometer (NS)
• Low mass/low power for flight
• Water-equivalent hydrogen > 0.5 wt% down
to 1 meter depth at 0.1 m/s roving speed
Sample Evaluation –Near Infrared Spectrometer (NIR)
• Low mass/low power for flight
• Mineral characterization and ice/water
detection before volatile processing
• Controlled illumination source
Volatile Content/Oxygen Extraction –Oxygen & Volatile Extraction Node (OVEN)
• Temperature range of <100K to 900K
• 50 operations nominal
• Fast operations for short duration missions
• Process 30 to 60 gm of sample per operation
(Order of magnitude greater than TEGA & SAM)
Operational Control –[NASA KSC]
• Custom power and data
acquisition design
Surface Mobility/Operation [NASA JSC]
• Low mass/large payload capability
• Tele-operated using stereo-cameras and sensors
• Ground communications and thermal
management
RESOLVE Instrument Suite Specifications• Nom. Mission Life = 4+ Cores, 12+ days• Mass = 60-70 kg• Dimensions = w/o rover: 68.5 x 112 x 1200 cm• Ave. Power; 200 W
Volatile Content Evaluation –Lunar Advanced Volatile Analysis (LAVA)
• Fast analysis, complete GC-MS
analysis in under 2 minutes
• Measure water content of regolith
at 0.5% (weight) or greater
• Characterize volatiles of interest
below 70 AMU
• On-board calibration and sweep gases @
2000psi
Title_Design Editor SBU / NO-ITAR Pre-Decisional 12/16/2014 7
RESOLVE 3rd Generation PrototypeNear Flight Mass, Volume and Power
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA Resource Prospector
Design Reference Mission*
* The following charts describe the current Design Reference Mission (DRM)
for Resource Prospector. Plans are preliminary and subject to discussions
with candidate partners
Title_Design Editor SBU / NO-ITAR Pre-Decisional 12/16/2014 9
Getting there… (NASA notional plan)
• Cruise Phase:
– 5-day direct Earth to Moon transfer w/DSN S-band
– Spin up to 1 rpm using Attitude Control System (post-TLI)
• No de-spin during TCMs
– Perform system checkout
– Perform two TCMs (nom.)
– Perform two Neutron Spec calibrations (nom.)
• Contingency / Off nominal
– Allows for two (2) additional TCMs
– Propellant margin for spin / de-spin for thermal anomalies
Earth Departure
TLI
Moon Arrival(Direct Descent)
TCM
TCM
Neutron
Spectrometer
Calibration 1
Neutron
Spectrometer
Calibration 2
System
Checkout
Title_Design Editor SBU / NO-ITAR Pre-Decisional 12/16/2014 10
Landing there… (NASA notional plan)
Cruise
Landed Surface
Operations
Descent & Landing
TCMs w/Spin
stabilized attitude
perpendicular to Sun
DTE Comm via omni
antenna
During cruise, comm
link is used for
payload calibration &
bake-out operations
Assume power up
post separation (after
shroud jettison)
Lander power down upon landing
Rover DTE
comm. during
surface ops
Payload & rover
checkout + NS cal,
prior to release &
roll-off of rover.
Payload/rover
powered on
during descent
Landing images
captured during
descent
Title_Design Editor SBU / NO-ITAR Pre-Decisional 12/16/2014 11
Prospecting… (NASA notional plan)
1. While roving, Near IR Spectrometer searches for
surface H2O/OH, and the Neutron Spectrometer
searches for subsurface hydrogen-bearing
compounds
Title_Design Editor SBU / NO-ITAR Pre-Decisional 12/16/2014 12
Prospecting… (NASA notional plan)
1. While roving, Near IR Spectrometer searches for
surface H2O/OH, and the Neutron Spectrometer
searches for subsurface hydrogen-bearing
compounds
2. When elevated levels of hydrogen are found a
decision is made to either auger and observe tailings
with NIR Spec or to capture a sample and evaluate
using OVEN/LAVA.
Title_Design Editor SBU / NO-ITAR Pre-Decisional 12/16/2014 13
Evaluating… (NASA notional plan)
1. While roving, Near IR Spectrometer searches for
surface H2O/OH, and the Neutron Spectrometer
searches for subsurface hydrogen-bearing
compounds
2. When elevated levels of hydrogen are found a
decision is made to either auger and observe tailings
with NIR Spec or to capture a sample for detailed
analysis
3. If a sample is acquired it is processed and evaluated
by OVEN/LAVA
Title_Design Editor SBU / NO-ITAR Pre-Decisional 12/16/2014 14
Mapping… (NASA notional plan)
Mapping of volatiles and samples continue across
a variety environments, testing theories of
emplacement and retention, and constraining
economics of extraction.
Title_Design Editor SBU / NO-ITAR Pre-Decisional 12/16/2014 15
Polar landing site based on meeting the
following four criteria
1. Surface/Subsurface Volatiles
− High hydrogen content
(LRO LEND instrument)
− Constant <100 K temperatures
10 cm below surface
(LRO Diviner instrument)
− Surface OH/H2O (M3, LRO LAMP &
Diviner)
2. Reasonable terrain for traverse
3. Direct view to Earth for communication
4. Sunlight for duration of mission for power
Subsurface volatiles
Sun illumination
Traversable
terrain
Direct to
Earth (DTE)
comm
RPM Landing Site Selection
Title_Design Editor SBU / NO-ITAR Pre-Decisional 12/16/2014 16
SA
SB
SC
Red labels indicate examples of candidate landing sites
considered so far
Cabeus
Shoemaker
Landing Site Possibilities(South Pole)
Haworth
NH
NN
Title_Design Editor SBU / NO-ITAR Pre-Decisional 12/16/2014 17
Study Site for MCR: NW Haworth (S6)
Site ID: S6
Latitude: -86.33
Longitude: -14.192
Altitude (km): 0.468
Haworth
HW
Sunrise/Landing Date: 4/30/2018
Sunrise/Landing Time: 5:46
Sundown Date: 5/6/2018
Sundown Time: 11:52
Sunlit Surface Duration: 6.3 Days
Title_Design Editor SBU / NO-ITAR Pre-Decisional 12/16/2014 18
Nominal Surface Traverse
Minimum Success Full Success
643
1. Landing Site & Check Out
2. Minimum Success achieved
3. Auger. Drive-Prospecting
4. Reach PSR. Evaluate and checkout
5. Prospecting inside shadowed area
6. Evaluation of shadow data, plan PSR
campaign and recharge battery for next entry
7. Re-enter PSR. Do detailed science
evaluation, auger, core, samples
8. Depart PSR, do data evaluation, regolith
oxygen extraction (ROE) test. Full Mission
Success achieved. Stretch mission begins.
2 5 7 8
Title_Design Editor SBU / NO-ITAR Pre-Decisional 12/16/2014 19
Notional Mission Animation
Title_Design Editor SBU / NO-ITAR Pre-Decisional 12/16/2014 20
Mission Status
• Payload continues in development with an integrated demonstration
including the Rover scheduled for September 2015 at JSC.
• International partner contributions will be finalized by the end of 2015.
• Flight Payload Development begins in FY16 and payload is delivered for
integration with rover and spacecraft in Spring 2019.
• Launch tentatively scheduled for Spring 2020.
– Exact launch date will be driven by final site selection
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Backups
Title_Design Editor SBU / NO-ITAR Pre-Decisional 12/16/2014 22
Robotic Lunar Lander
Reference Configuration
Cruise Configuration
Power •Solar Array Power lunar day
•Secondary Batteries for peak power needs
•Power System Electronics
Propulsion •Bi-Propellant (MMH / MON1)
•70 lbf Descent Engines RS34 (16)
•5 lbf ACS Engines (12)
•4 custom metal diaphragm tanks
•Star 48 for braking
Avionics •Integrated Flight Computer and PDU
(LADEE)
RF •S-band Transponder
•Antenna on lander, RF equipment on rover
GN&C • Star Tracker (dual)
• Sun Sensors
• IMU (LN200)
• Radar Altimeter
• Landing Cameras (2)
Structure • Riveted sheet metal aluminum primary
structure
•No deployable ramps
•Wide base, low CG
Star 48
Descent
Engines RS34
ACS Engines
Riveted Structure
Star Tracker
Avionics
Dish Antenna
Omni Antenna
Omni Antenna
Lander Element
Title_Design Editor SBU / NO-ITAR Pre-Decisional 12/16/2014 23
RPM “Who’s Who” - NASA
AES: Advanced Exploration Systems
ARC: Ames Research Center
FPO: Flight Project Office
GRC: Glenn Research Center
HEO: Human Exploration & Operations Mission Directorate
HQ: Headquarters
JPL: Jet Propulsion Lab
JSC: Johnson Space Center
KSC: Kennedy Space Center
LSP: Launch Services Program
MSFC: Marshall Spaceflight Center
ARC
Instruments
LSP
LV
KSC
Payload
MSFC
Gov’t Lander concept
APL
Gov’t Lander
Support
JSC
Gov’t Lander concept
JPL
Gov’t Lander
Support
GRC
Payload Support
ARC
PM, MSE, SMA, PS, Ops,
I&T, EPO
HQ/HEO
AES
JSC
Instruments
JPL
Instrument
Title_Design Editor SBU / NO-ITAR Pre-Decisional 12/16/2014 24
RPM “Who’s Who” – Int’nl Partners
NASA (USA)
RPM Payload, LV, Ops, I&T
CSA (Canada)
Rover?
NASA (USA)
Rover?
CSA (Canada)
Drill?
NSPO (Taiwan)
Lander?
KARI (S Korea)
Drill?
JAXA (Japan)
Lander?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA RPM System Elements
The following charts reveal the notional system elements supportin the
NASA DRM for RPM.
Title_Design Editor SBU / NO-ITAR Pre-Decisional 12/16/2014 26
Resource Prospector Mission Segments
Launch Vehicle
Launch Support Services
Payload Processing
Launch Segment
Hardware
Software
Facilities
Ground Segment
ARC MMOC
OC Connectivity
Ground Data System
DSN 34m
Networks
Mission OC – ARC
Rover OC – CSA
Payload OC – KSC
Lander OC - MSFC
Operation(s) Centers
Space Segment
Space Vehicle
Subsystems
Lander
RESOLVE
Instrument
Suite
Rover
Surface Segment
RESOLVE
Instrument
Suite
Rover
Title_Design Editor SBU / NO-ITAR Pre-Decisional 12/16/2014 27
ETU Reference Design
Base 660 mm x 850 mm
Payload Element
• The Neutron Spectrometer Subsystem will be used to verify
the presence of hydrogen rich materials and then map the
distribution of these materials to assist in sample site selection.
• The Near Infrared (NIR) Spectrometer Subsystem will be used
to scan the immediate vicinity of the drill site before and during
drill/auger operations to look for near real-time changes in the
properties of the materials exposed during the drilling process.
• The Drill Subsystem includes the hardware to physically
excavate/extract regolith from the lunar surface to a depth of 1 m
and deliver the sample to one or more reactor chambers for
further processing by the OVEN Subsystem.
• The Oxygen and Volatile Extraction Node (OVEN) Subsystem
will accept samples from the Drill Subsystem and will evolve the
volatiles contained in the sample by heating the regolith in a
sealed chamber and will also extract oxygen from the remaining
regolith sample.
• The Lunar Advanced Volatile Analysis (LAVA) Subsystem
will accept the effluent gas/vapor from the OVEN Subsystem and
will analyze that effluent gas using gas chromatograph and/or
mass spectrometer sensor technologies.
Title_Design Editor SBU / NO-ITAR Pre-Decisional 12/16/2014 28
Rover Element
Requirement Value
Volume Envelope 2m x 1.4m x 1.6m (H x L x W)
3m X 1.6m X 1.6m under review in
rover/lander ICD
Mass ~300 Kg (180 kg rover, 110kg payload) (TBC)
Speed 10 cm/s (nominal) .. 30 cm/s (max),
Power & Energy 3.7Kwhr battery, static solar panel avg. 200 W
Maximum Range 3 Km max traverse
Maximum Gradient/Side Slope 15 degrees / 10 degrees
Localization 5 m over 100m traverse (To be met w/ Mission
Ops)
Ground Clearance/Obstacle
Crossing
35 cm / 30 cm
Payload Bay Payload to be integrated, and then to rover
Bandwidth Limits ~2 kbits/s (low rate), ~400 kbits/s (high rate)
Shadow Operations 6 hours (repeatable)
Lunar Night Survivability Under investigation
Title_Design Editor SBU / NO-ITAR Pre-Decisional 12/16/2014 29
Lander Element
• Purpose
Deliver Payload (Rover with RESOLVE instruments) from TLI to lunar surface– Provide thermal and power to rover during cruise phase
– Soft landing with 100 meter radius landing accuracy.
– Allow rover egress
– Rover w/ payload mass 325 kg
– Design to lowest cost (for lander partner)
– Fit on Falcon 9 V1.1 launch vehicle
Title_Design Editor SBU / NO-ITAR Pre-Decisional 12/16/2014 30
Payload/Rover/Lander Element Assembly
Space Segment
Lander / Space Vehicle
Surface Segment
Rover
Science Payload
Title_Design Editor SBU / NO-ITAR Pre-Decisional 12/16/2014 31
Sampling
Prospecting
NIR Volatiles Spectrometer
System (NIRVSS)• Surface H2O/OH identification
• Near-subsurface sample
characterization
• Drill site imaging
• Drill site temperatures
The RPM Tool Box (NASA notional plan)
Auger / Core Drill• Subsurface sample acquisition
• Auger for near-surface assay
• Core for detailed subsurface
assay
Neutron Spectrometer System
(NSS)• Water-equivalent hydrogen > 0.5
wt% down to 1[m] depth
MobilityRover• Mobility system
• Cameras
• Surface interaction
Processing &
Analysis
Oxygen & Volatile Extraction
Node (OVEN)• Volatile Content/Oxygen
Extraction by warming
• Total sample mass
Lunar Advanced Volatile
Analysis (LAVA) • Analytical volatile identification
and quantification in delivered
sample with GC/MS
• Measure water content of
regolith at 0.5% (weight) or
greater
• Characterize volatiles of
interest below 70 AMU
Title_Design Editor SBU / NO-ITAR Pre-Decisional 12/16/2014 32
Mass Budget Notional Assumptions
Maximum Landed Mass: 1,084.8 kgMaximum Landed Mass = Lander / Rover / Payload Mass – Propellants
Mass Allocation
(kg)
Lander Dry Mass 737.8
Inerts * 22.0
Propellants 307.2
Lander Wet Mass 1,067.0
Science Payload 105.0
Rover 220.0
Lander / Rover / Payload Mass 1,392.0
Braking Stage & Hardware 2,194.0
Interstage Adapters 84.0
Spacecraft Mass at TLI 3,670.0
Project Mgmt Reserve** 183.5
Launch Vehicle Reserve*** 6.6
LV Max Throw at TLI 3,860.1
** Calculated as 5% of "Spacecraft Mass at TLI"
*** Calculated as "LV Max Throw at TLI" minus "Spacecraft Mass at TLI" minus "Project Mgmt Reserve"
32
* Residual propellants, pressurants in the tanks and lines
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA Landing Site & Operations
The following charts reveal the notional landing site, conditions and
mission surface plans
Title_Design Editor SBU / NO-ITAR Pre-Decisional 12/16/2014 34
Cabeus
Shoemaker
Lunar South Pole Context
Title_Design Editor SBU / NO-ITAR Pre-Decisional 12/16/2014 35
RPM Example Traverse