research designs & reading and writing with apa style psych 231: research methods in psychology
TRANSCRIPT
Research Designs &Reading and Writing
with APA Style
Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology
Announcements
Today’s office hours shortened (2-2:30)
Exam 1 is 1½ weeks away
This week’s labs: Download and read the Assefi & Garry (2003) article before
labs Bring the article to labs
Types of research designs
Case studies Intensive study of a small set of individuals and their
behaviors
Correlational Looking for a co-occurrence relationship between two
(or more) variables
Experimental Investigating the cause-and-effect relationship between
two (or more) variables through the manipulation of variables
Quasi-experimental• Experimental designs with one or more non-random variables
Case Histories
This view has a number of disadvantages There may be poor generalizabilty There are typically a number of possible confounds and
alternative explanations
Intensive study of a single person, a very traditional method. Typically: Descriptive (and non-experimental). Interesting (and often rare) case. Fits well with clinical work.
See: Oliver Sacks’ books for some other great examples
Phineas Gage Sept 13, 1848 Explosion propelled a
railroad tamping rod through his brain Changed personality
Correlational Methods
Measure two (or more) variables for each individual and see if the variables co-occur (suggesting that they are related)
Used for: Predictions Establishing Reliability and Validity Evaluating theories
Problems: Shouldn’t make casual claims
? or or
Causal claims
We’d like to say:
To be able to do this: There must be co-variation between the two variables
The causal variable must come first Directionality problem
• Happy people sleep well
• Or is it that sleeping well when you’re happy? Need to eliminate plausible alternative explanations
Third variable problem• Do Storks bring babies?
• Neyman (1952) reported a strong positive correlation between number of babies and stork sightings
causes
or
Storks and babies
r = 0.63
Source: Kronmal (1993)
• Do Storks bring babies?• Neyman (1952) reported a strong positive correlation
between number of babies and stork sightings
Theory 1: Storks deliver babies
• Is killing storks and effective method of controlling birth rates?
Theory 2: Underlying third variable
The experimental method
Manipulating and controlling variables in laboratory experiments
Must have a comparison At least two groups (often more) that get compared One groups serves as a control for the other group
Variables Independent variable - the variable that is manipulated
• Allows for the testing of causal hypotheses Dependent variable - the variable that is measured Control variables - held constant for all participants in the
experiment
The experimental method
Advantages
Precise control possible Precise measurement
possible Theory testing possible Can make causal claims
Disadvantages
Artificial situations may restrict generalization to “real world”
Complex behaviors may be difficult to measure
Manipulating and controlling variables in laboratory experiments
Reading and Writing with Style (APA)
The Literature Why Review it? What is it? How do you read it? How do you write it?
Why review the literature
What are the underlying motivations for doing a review of the literature? Getting ideas. What has been done? (what has not been done?) Understanding the relevant theories. What variables are important? What methodologies have been used? Avoid past mistakes.
What is the literature?
Primary Sources - essentially reading the original report Journal articles Edited books (sometimes) Professional meetings Electronic publishing (fairly new, pluses and minuses) Faculty members & other personal communications
Secondary Sources - reading a report of the report Literature Reviews
Psychological Bulletin, Annual Review of Psychology Text books Citations in books and articles
What is the literature?
Primary Sources - essentially reading the original report Journal articles Edited books (sometimes) Professional meetings Electronic publishing (fairly new, pluses and minuses) Faculty members & other personal communications
Secondary Sources - reading a report of the report
Advantages• Good starting place• Often reviews a lot of
relevant literature• Relatively brief descriptions
Disadvantages• Somebody else’s description
• May be incorrect • May be biased
• Not enough detail
Reading a research article
What are the goals of a research article? For the reader to:
Know about the research Understand what was done
Allow further testing & replication Be convinced by the research (hopefully)
Standardization of research report format APA style Organization and content reflects the logical thinking in
scientific investigation Standardization helps with clarity
Read with a critical eye Write with clarity in mind
Misconceptions about Scientific writing
Writing the paper is the routine part of the research process Forces you to commit to your evidence and conclusions
Just the facts The facts are just part of the argument that the author is
making
What you say is all that is important, how you say it isn’t important Good writing leads to higher chance of accomplishing your
goals
Writing style
Psychological writing tends to differ from other academic writings
• Not a creative writing exercise• Presenting an argument based on data and logical
reasoning
• Try to avoid using direct quotes, restate things in your own words.
• Avoid digression• Footnotes are rare, they’re used to elaborate/clarify
a point. Try to do so in the text.• If long digressions, use the appendix
Writing resources
The ultimate resource for APA style is the APA Publication manual
Chapter 8 of your textbook is good too. Also websites to help too.
New 6th ed.
Writing resources
A great book for Psychological writing
Sternberg, R. J. (2003). The psychologist’s companion: A guide to scientific writing for students and researchers. Cambridge University Press, NY.
Why a structured format?
To ease communication of what was done Forces a minimal amount of information Provides a logical framework (for argument) Provides consistent format within a discipline
• People know what to expect• Where to find the information in the article
Allows readers to cross-reference your sources easily
Major goal: Clarity
Communicate with clarity
Major goal: Clarity
Communicate with clarity
Major goal: Clarity
Communicate with clarity Write for the reader
• Think about your audience, what do they already know, what don’t they know
Avoid overstatements• Be conservative in your claims
Emphasize the positive• Focus on how the data supports a theory not just on
how it refutes another theory
Major goal: Clarity
Communicate with clarity Avoid
• Jargon when possible• Slang and colloquialisms• Sexist and biased language
Try to be concise • Don’t use a whole paragraph when two sentences will do• Longer papers don’t mean better papers• Eliminate unnecessary redundancy• Use simple words (sentences) rather than complicated
words (sentences)
Major goal: Clarity
Use concrete words and examples Check your work!
• Read it over, make sure that you say what you mean to say
Use a consistent format (APA style)• It helps your reader understand your arguments and
the sources they’re built on. • It also helps you keep track of your sources as you
build arguments
Communicate with clarity
APA style: Parts of a research report
• Title Page
Adolescent Depression 1
Running Head: ADOLESCENT DEPRESSION
Adolescent Depression and Attachment
Ima G. Student and Soyam Eye
Purdue University
• Abstract
Adolescent Depression 2
We explored attachment in a family context by applying family systems principles to the investigation of multiple attachment relationships within families. This study focused on maternal adult attachment with respect to family of origin experiences. We examined associations between maternal adult attachment and three levels of family functioning including individual maternal depression symptoms, dyadic marital satisfaction and family unit functioning. We found that attachment security with respect to particular relationships was differentially associated with different levels of family functioning.
• Body
• References• Authors Notes• Footnotes• Tables• Figure Captions• Figures
Adolescent Depression 29
References
Barnett, P. A., & Gotlib, I. H. (1988). Psychosocial functioning and depression: Distinguishing among antecedents, concomitants, and consequences. Psychological Bulletin, 104. Beck, A. T. (1978). Beck Depression Inventory. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation. Benoit, D., Vidovic, D., & Roman, J. (1991, April). Transmission of attachment across three generations. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development. Benoit, D., Zeanah, C. H., & Barton, M. L. (1989). Maternal attachment disturbances in failure to thrive. Infant Mental Health Journal, 3, 185-202. Benoit, D., Zeanah, C. H., Boucher, C., & Minde, K. (1989). Sleep disorders in early childhood: Association with insecure maternal attachment. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 31, 86-93.
The anatomy of a research article
The basic parts of a research article: Title and authors - gives you a general idea of
the topic and specifically who did it Abstract - short summary of the article
Title Page
Running Head: ADOLESCENT DEPRESSION 1
Adolescent Depression and Attachment
Ima G. Student and Soyam Eye
Topnotch University
Published title pages will look a bit different, but you’ll find these pieces of information. Typically the body of the article will begin as well.
Title should be maximally informative while short
(10 to 12 words recommended)
Running head – will go on each page of published article,
no more than 50 characters
Affiliation – where the bulk of
the research was done
Order of Authorship sometimes
carries meaning
Abstract
Abstract: Short summary of entire paper• 100 to 120 words • The problem/issue• The method• The results• The major conclusions
Recommendation: write this after you’ve finished the rest of the paper
Good first contact, but remember that it is short on detail Shows up in PsycInfo Gets skimmed before reading the article
Body
Hourglass shape
BackgroundLiterature Review
Start broad
Body
Hourglass shape
Statement of purposeSpecific hypotheses (at least at conceptual level)
Narrow focus
Body
Hourglass shape
- Methods- Results
Most focused
Body
Hourglass shape
DiscussionConclusionsImplications
Broaden
Body
Introduction - gives you the background that you need Issue and Background
• What is it? Why is it interesting/important? Literature Review
• What has been done? What theories are out there? Statement of purpose
• What are you going to do and why? Specific hypotheses (at least at conceptual level)
• What do you predict will happen in your research?
Body
Introduction - gives you the background that you need
Writing checklist• Be cohesive
• Be relevant (why are the reviewed studies relevant?)• Work on the transitions (make the flow logical)
Reading checklist1) What is the author's goal?2) What are the hypotheses?3) If you had designed the study, how would YOU have done it?
Method - tells the reader exactly what was done Enough detail that the reader could actually replicate the
study. Subsections:
Participants - who were the data collected from How many, where they were selected from, any special
selection requirements, details about those who didn’t complete the experiment
Apparatus/ Materials - what was used to conduct the study Design
Suggested if you have a complex experimental design, often combined with Materials section
Procedure What did each participant do? Other details, including the
operational levels of your IV(s) and DV(s), counterbalancing, etc.
The basic parts of a research article :
Body
Method - tells the reader exactly what was done Reading checklist
1 a) Is your method better than theirs? b) Does the authors method actually test the hypotheses? c) What are the independent, dependent, and control
variables? 2) Based on what the authors did, what results do YOU expect?
• Writing checklist• Is it clear why the procedures were selected?• Are any assumptions explicit and defended?• Is the level of detail sufficient for replication?
The basic parts of a research article :
Body
Body
Results (state the results but don’t interpret them here) Verbal statement of results Tables and figures
• These get referred to in the text, but actually get put into their own sections at the end of the manuscript
Statistical Outcomes• Means, standard deviations, t-tests, ANOVAs, correlations, etc.
Body
Results (state the results but don’t interpret them here)
Reading checklist1) Did the author get unexpected results?
2 a) How does the author interpret the results?
b) How would YOU interpret the results?
c) What implications would YOU draw from these results?
• Writing checklist• Is it clear how the hypotheses are tested by the analyses?• Would a graph or table help clarify the results?• What questions might the reader still have, and how could
I answer them in this section?
Body
Discussion (interpret the results) Relationship between purpose and results Theoretical (or methodological) contribution Implications Future directions (optional) Reading checklist
1 a) Does YOUR interpretation or the authors' interpretation best represent the data?
b) Do you or the author draw the most sensible implications and conclusions?
• Writing checklist• Have you stated your most convincing argument?
• Do the conclusions follow straightforwardly from the results?
The rest
References Author’s name Year Title of work Publication information
• Journal• Issue• Pages
Adolescent Depression 29 References
Barnett, P. A., & Gotlib, I. H. (1988). Psychosocial functioning and depression: Distinguishing among antecedents, concomitants, and consequences. Psychological Bulletin, 104. Beck, A. T. (1978). Beck Depression Inventory. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation. Benoit, D., Vidovic, D., & Roman, J. (1991, April). Transmission of attachment across three generations. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development. Benoit, D., Zeanah, C. H., & Barton, M. L. (1989). Maternal attachment disturbances in failure to thrive. Infant Mental Health Journal, 3, 185-202. Benoit, D., Zeanah, C. H., Boucher, C., & Minde, K. (1989). Sleep disorders in early childhood: Association with insecure maternal attachment. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 31, 86-93.
When something odd comes up, don’t guess. Look it up!
The rest
References Authors Notes (new guidelines put these on
title page) Footnotes Tables Figure Captions Figures
Figures and tables
These are used to supplement the text.
To make a point clearer for the reader.
Typically used for: The design Examples of stimuli Patterns of results
Checklist - things to watch for
Clarity Acknowledge the work of others (avoid
plagiarism) Active vs. passive voice
Active: Summers and Jordan (2009) hypothesized that speakers use to much passive voice
Passive: It was hypothesized by Summers and Jordan (2009) that speakers use to much passive voice
Checklist - things to watch for
Avoid biased language APA guidelines:
• Accurate descriptions of individuals (e.g., Asian vs. Korean)• Be sensitive to labels (e.g., “Oriental”)
Appropriate use of headings Correct citing and references Good grammar
APA style checklist